+ All Categories
Home > Documents > TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M...

TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M...

Date post: 22-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
31
TR Assessments – Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads Randy Wyble, MS, CTRS Roy H. Olsson, Jr., Ph.D., CTRS
Transcript
Page 1: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

TR Assessments – Moving From Paper & Pencil to

iPads

Randy Wyble, MS, CTRS

Roy H. Olsson, Jr., Ph.D., CTRS

Page 2: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

A copy of this presentation can be found at:

www.gvsu.edu/tr

About>Faculty/Staff and then scroll down to Randy’s profile

Page 3: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Learning Objectives

• Identify the different domains of the Recreation Profile Inventory (RPI) assessment app

• Administer and retrieve results using the RPI assessment app

• Identify three ways in which the app could be redesigned for future use

• Identify one example of the role the app could play in their own assessment process

Page 4: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Session Overview

• Development of the Recreational Profile Inventory and relevant research

• Development of the RPI app

• Hands on experience with provided iPads (or download onto your own from the App store)

• Generated report

• Further development….we need your input!

Page 5: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Development of the Recreational Profile Inventory and Relevant Research

Page 6: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Functional Living Skills

Assessment Parameters

M

SD

COTES

Parameters

M

SD

Statistical Relationship

r T p

I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning 2.3 0.97 0.87 8.5 <0.001

2. Organization of

time and material

2.7

1.0

2. Complexity and

organization of task

2.9

1.0

0.91

10.8

<0.001

3. Following directions 3.3 0.88 3. Following directions 3.2 0.85 0.93 12.4 <0.001

4. Decision making 1.8 1.8 4. Decision making 2.0 1.6 0.98 23.8 <.001

5. Problem solving 2.5 1.3 5. Problem solving 2.2 1.2 0.94 13.3 <0.001

6. Reality orientation 1.0 0.99 6. Reality orientation 1.1 0.89 0.91 10.8 <0.001

7. Attention span 1.3 1.6 7. Concentration 1.6 1.5 0.97 18.3 <0.001

8. Motor performance 1.7 1.5 8. Coordination 1.8 1.4 0.94 12.9 <0.001

9. Self-esteem 0.58 0.56 9. Appearance + negative

response from others + self-asserting

(X = total number/3)

0.45

0.44

0.94

13.6

<0.001

10. Motivation 1.2 0.68 10. Punctuality + engagement

+ activity neatness + attention to detail + interest in activity + interest or accomplishment

(X = total number/6)

1.3

0.52

0.88

9.0

<0.001

11. Frustration tolerance

1.1 1.6 11. Frustration tolerance 0.96 1.4 0.97 21.7 <0.001

12. Nonproductive

behavior

0.46 0.50 12. Nonproductive behavior 0.46 0.50 1.0 IO.I <0,001

TABLE 1

Criterion-Related Validity: Functional Living Skills Assessment to

Comprehensive Occupational Therapy Evaluation Scale on Select Parameters

Study 3; CVA and TBI

N = 21

Page 7: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Functional skills

Study 1

(N = 39)

Study 2

(N = )

Short-term visual memory 1.0 0.966

Organization of time and materials 0.895 0.915

Following directions 0.946 0.952

Long-term memory 0.991 1.0

Decision making 1.0 0.990

Money management 1.0 1.0

Reality orientation 1.0 1.0

Short-term verbal memory 0.986 0.994

Attention span 0.998 0.951

Motor performance 0.989 0.978

Behavior skills

Appearance 1.0 1.0

Motivation 0.948 0.979

Frustration tolerance 0.977 1.0

Nonproductive behavior 0.943 0.977

Social/Communication skills

Verbal communication 1.0 1.0

Interaction skills 1.0 0.988

Attention seeking 1.0 1.0

Nonverbal communication 1.0 1.0

Self-assertion 1.0 1.0

Study I: Moderate to mild MR and CP

Study 2: CVA and Alzheimer's long-term care

TABLE 2

Interrater Reliability for Select Parameters

from the Functional Living Skills Assessment

Page 8: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Parameter

Observer 1 Observer 2 Statistical Analyses

M SD M SD r T SD

1. New learning

2.

3.0 0.43 3.1 0.79 0.97 10.9 <0.001

2. Organization of time and material 2.7 1.0 2.8 1.1 0.97 18.7 <0.001

3. Following directions 3.3 0.88 3.3 0.88 1.0 10.1 <0.001

4. Old learning 2.2 1.3 2.3 1.3 0.99 33.7 <0.001

5. Decision making 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 0.99 44.7 <0.001

6. Problem solving 2.5 1.3 2.4 1.5 0.98 23.9 <0.001

7. Money management 3.2 0.90 3.3 0.92 0.98 22.5 <0.001

8. Reality orientation 1.0 0.99 1.0 0.99 1.0 10.1 <0.001

9. Retention span 3.0 0.87 2.9 1.0 0.93 12.6 <0.001

10. Attention span 1.3 1.6 1.3 1.6 0.99 10.l <0.001

11. Motor performance 1.7 1.5 1.7 1.5 1.0 72.3 <0.001

12. Self-esteem 0.58 0.50 0.58 0.50 1.0 10.1 <0.001

13. Motivation 1.2 0.68 1.1 0.75 0.93 12.5 <0.001

14. Frustration tolerance 1.1 1.6 1.0 1.6 0.98 23.3 <0.001

15. Nonproductive behavior 0.46 0.50 0.46 0.50 1.0 10.1 <0.001

TABLE 3

Interrater Reliability for Select Parameters from the

Functional Living Skills Assessment

Study 3; CVA and TBI

N = 21

Page 9: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Parameters

Cognitive Behavior

ORG FD OL DM PS MM RO RS AS MP MOT FT NP

Cognitive

New learning

Organization of

time and materials

Following directions

Old learning Decision

making Problem

solving Money

management Reality

orientation Retention

span Attention span

Behavior

Self-esteem

Motivation Frustration

tolerance

.65

.78

.75

.48

.80

.66

.56

.68

.43

.74

.72

.55

.70

.74

.70

.65

.40

.42

.82

.69

.66

.68

.71

.31

,68

.73

.53

.70 .42 .68 .64 .61 .41 .56

.43 .73 .44 .52 .48 .61

.56 .51 .60 .39 .72

.33 .66 .51 .53

.40 .50 .37

.61 .67

.43

.59 .63 .61

.68 .52

.56

TABLE 4

Intercorrelations of Functional Parameters

ORG = organization of time and materials, FD = following directions, OL = old learning, DM = decision making,

PS = problem solving, MM = money management, RO = reality orientation, RS = retention span, AS = attention span, MP =

motor performance, MOT = motivation, FT = frustration tolerance, NP = nonproductive behavior

Page 10: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

RLP Mirenda

rho = 1.0

p <0.01

Interest Area RLP Interest Area Mirenda X Rank X Rank

Sports Sports 30.6 5 35.1 5

Games Games 22.3 2 30.3 2

Crafts Crafts 14.0 1 28.1 1

Expression Art and music 24.5 3 31.1 3

Community Education/entertainment/

culture and nature

divided by 2

27.3

4

34.1

4

TABLE 5

Validity Correlation between the Recreation and Leisure Profile

and the Mirenda for Select Activity Interest Areas

N = 60 adults, male subjects = 27, female subjects = 33, age range 27-61, n = 44

High scores/ranges indicate highest interest

Page 11: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

RLP Mirenda

rho = 1.0

p <0.01

Interest Area RLP Interest Area Mirenda X Rank X Rank

Sports Sports 32.5 5 36.8 5

Games Games 23.4 3 30.0 3

Crafts Crafts 9.4 1 24.1 1

Expression Art and music 22.6 2 27.8 2

Community Education/entertainment/

culture and nature

divided by 2

31.2

4

30.7

4

TABLE 6

Validity Correlation between the Leisure Profile Inventory

and the Mirenda for Select Activity Interest Areas

N = 38 high school juniors and seniors, male subjects = 20, female subjects = 18, age range 16-18, X = 17

High scores/ranges indicate highest interest

Page 12: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Motivational

Attitude Areas

RLP

Leisure Value Areas

Leisure

Satisfaction

Areas

LPI

X

Values

X

Satisfaction

X

r

T

P

Emotional release Relaxation

2.3 18.3

0.59 3.0 <0.01

Physical enhancement Physical development

2.7 14.8

0.75 13.9 <0.001

Self-expression Self-expression

2.4 12.8

0.53 2.6 <0.05

Social interaction

enhancement

Social +

social recognition

divided by 2

2.2

10.6

0.76

5.0

<0.001

Sense of control Self-dependence

1.9 13.8

0.49 2.4 <0.001

Sense of accomplishment Accomplishment

2.6 14.6

0.80 5.7 <0.001

Intellectual enhancement Intellectual development

2.3 13.8

0.62 3.3 <0.01

Creative enhancement

Creativity 2.0

13.8 0.83 6.5 <0.001

TABLE 7

Validity Correlations between the Recreation and Leisure Profile and the

Leisure Values and Satisfaction Scales for Motivational Attitude Areas

N = 60 adults, male subjects = 27, female subjects = 33, age range 27-61, X = 44

Page 13: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Style Areas

RLP

Style Areas

LDB Style Areas

Mirenda

LPI

X

I.DB

X

Mirenda

X

r

T

p

Participating/spectating Active/passive

3.5 6.3

0.81 6.2 <0.001

Myself/group Group/individual

2.7 7.9

-0.83 -6.1 <0.001

Nonrisk/risk Risk/non risk

3.7 3.1

-0.72 -4.4 <0.001

Competitive/

noncompetitive

Competitive/

noncompetitive

2.9

16.0

0.72

4.3

<0.001

N = 60 adults, male subjects = 27, female subjects = 33, age range 27-61, X = 44

TABLE 8

Validity Correlations between the Recreation and Leisure Profile and the

Leisure Diagnostic Battery and Mirenda for Styles Areas

Page 14: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

TABLE 9

Validity and Correlations between the Recreation and Leisure Profile

and the Leisure Diagnostic Battery for Barriers Scales

Barriers

RLP

Barriers

LDB

LPI

X

LDB

X

r

T

P

Lack of time Time 2.6 9.4 0.67 3.8 <0.01

Lack of money Money 2.0 6.8 0.58 2.9 <0.01

Fear of failure Ability l.5 6.0 0.50 2.4 <0.01

Lack of recreation skills Ability 1.6 6.0 0.67 3.8 <0.01

Lack of transportation Opportunity

1.1 5.8 0.46 2.1 <0.05

Lack of motivation Motivation 1.8 7.2 0.86 7.1 <0.001

Lack of social skills Social

1.4 6.6 0.78 5.2 <0.001

Lack of decision-making skills Decision making 1.4 6.5 0.78 5.2 <0.001

Lack of problem-solving skills

Decision making 1.4 6.5 0.83 6.3 <0.001

Lack of physical mobility Ability 1.8 6.0 0.59 3.1 <0.01

N = 60 adults, male subjects = 27, female subjects = 33, age range 27-61, X = 44

Page 15: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Interest Areas

Test 1 Test 2

X Rank X Rank

Sports Area

Team sports 8.7 10 9.2 10

Adventure sports 10.5 13 10.2 13

Individual/dual sports 11.8 14 11.5 14

Games Area

Table games 7.2 7 7.7 7

Solitary games 8.5 9 8.7 9

Physical skill games 6.4 5 6.4 5

Expression Area

rho = 0.99

Music 9.6 11 9.6 11.5 P < 0.001

Art 6.9 6 7.1 6

Dance/drama 7.9 8 7.8 8

Crafts Area

Wood/tooling 5.0 2 4.7 2

Clay 3.8 1 3.8 1

Stitchery 5.2 3 5.3 3

Community

Entertainment 9.7 12 9.6 11.5

Pets 6.0 4 5.5 4

Outdoor recreation 12.8 15 12.8 15

TABLE 10

Reliability Correlations for the Recreation and Leisure Profile:

Leisure Interest Section B

N = 60 adults, male subjects = 27, female subjects = 33, age range 27-61, X = 44

High scores/ranks indicate highest interest

Page 16: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Interest Areas

Test 1 Test 2

X Rank X Rank

Sports Area

Team sports 12.1 14 12.4 14

Adventure sports 11.3 12 11.3 12

Individual/dual sports 11.7 13 11.4 13

Games Area

Table games 6.8 6 7.3 6

Solitary games 6.5 5 6.6 5

Physical skill games 8.2 9 7.6 8

Expression Area

rho = 0.99

Music 9.6 10 9.6 10 P < 0.001

Art 5.5 4 5.5 4

Dance/drama 7.4 7 7.5 7

Crafts Area

Wood/tooling 3.6 3 3.3 3

Clay 2.7 1 2.6 1

Stitchery 2.9 2 3.0 2

Community

Entertainment 12.7 15 12.7 15

Pets 7.7 8 8.2 9

Outdoor recreation 11.0 11 10.8 11

TABLE 11

Reliability Correlations for the Leisure Profile Inventory:

Leisure Interest Section B

N = 38 high school juniors and seniors, male subjects = 20, female subjects = 18, age range 16-18, X = 17

High scores/ranges indicate highest interest

Page 17: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Motivational attitudes

Study 1: N = 60

Adults

Study 1: N = 38

High School Students

Test 1

X

Test 2

X

r

T

P Test 1

X

Test 2

X

r

T

P

Emotional release 2.3 2.3 0.89 8.4 <0.001 2.5 2.7 0.71 4.2 <0.001

Physical enhancement 2.7 2.5 0.81 6.0 <0.001 2.7 2.7 0.92 10.2 <.001

Self-expression 2.4

2.3 0.80 5.7 <0.001 2.5 2.6 0.93 10.2 <0.001

Creative enhancement 2.0 1.8 0.79 5.5 <0.001 2.4 2.5 0.89 8.2 <0.001

Social interaction enhancement 2.2 2.2 0.96 15.3 <0.001 2.9 2.9 0.87 7.1 <0.001

Sense of control 1.9 2.1 0.88 7.7 <0.001 2.5 2.6 0.81 5.7 <0.001

Sense of accomplishment 2.6 2.6 1.0 8.8 <0.001 3.2 3.2 0.93 11.0 <0.001

Intellectual enhancement 2.3 2.4 0.91 9.6 <0.001 2.3 2.4 0.94 11.8 <0.001

TABLE 12

Reliability Correlations for Recreation and Leisure Profile:

Leisure Motivational Attitudes Section E

Page 18: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Style

Study 1: N = 60

Adults

Study 2:N = 38

High School Students

Test 1

X

Test 2

X

r

T

P Test 1

X

Test 2

X

r

T

P

Participating/spectating 3.5 3.5 0.98 23.0 <0.001 4.3 4.5 0.89 8.0 <0.001

Myself/group 2.7 2.7 0.85 10.0 <0.001 2.6 2.7 0.98 19.8 <0.001

Competitive/noncompetitive 2.9 2.9 0.91 7.2 <0.001 3.9 3.9 0.97 15.8 <0.001

Nonrisk/risk 3.7 3.6 0.95 13.3 <0.001 2.9 2.9 0.95 12.8 <0.001

TABLE 13

Reliability Correlations for Recreation and Leisure Profile:

Leisure Participation Style Section D

Page 19: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Barriers

Study 1: N = 60

Adults

Study 1: N = 38

High School Students

Test 1

X

Test 2

X

r

T

P Test 1

X

Test 2

X

r

T

P

Lack of:

Time

2.6

2.7

0.80

5.7

<0.001

2.3

2.3

0.96

13.4

<0.001

Money 2.0 2.0 0.82 6.1 <0.001 2.2 2.2 0.92 9.4 <.001

Recreation skills 1.6 1.6 0.89 8.3 <0.001 1.5 1.5 0.85 6.7 <0.001

Transportation 1.1 1.1 0.79 5.5 <0.001 1.6 1.7 0.95 13.1 <0.001

Motivation 1.7 1.7 0.91 9.6 <0.001 1.9 1.8 0.74 11.6 <0.001

Social skills 1.4 1.4 0.90 9.0 <0.001 1.4 1.4 0.83 6.1 <0.001

Decision-making skills 1.5 1.4 0.88 7.8 <0.001 1.7 1.8 0.94 12.2 <0.001

Problem-solving skills 1.4 1.6 0.88 8.0 <0.001 1.4 1.5 0.81 5.7 <0.001

Physical mobility 1.7 1.7 1.0 8.8 <0.001 1.5 1.5 0.93 10.4 <0.001

Fear of failure 1.4 1.5 0.90 9.0 <0.001 1.5 1.6 0.86 7.0 <0.001

TABLE 14

Reliability Correlations for Recreation and Leisure Profile Inventory:

Leisure Barriers Section F

Page 20: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Parameter

QFST

FLSA

r

T

SD M SD M SD

Verbal communication 0.18 0.39 0.18 0.39 1.0 8.0 <0.001

Nonverbal communication 0.18 0.53 0.18 0.53 1.0 8.0 <0.001

Retention span 0.26 0.50 0.26 0.50 1.0 8.0 <0.001

Motor performance 0.29 0.47 0.29 0.47 1.0 8.0 <0.001

Attention span 0.35 0.70 0.38 0.68 0.98 22.0 <0.001

Money management skills 0.06 0.24 0.06 0.24 1.0 8.0 <0.001

Self-esteem l.2 0.97 l.2 0.97 1.0 8.0 <0.001

Frustration tolerance 0.53 0.80 0.53 0.87 0.92 8.7 <0.001

Attention-seeking behavior 0.06 0.24 0.06 0.24 1.0 8.0 <0.001

Motivation 0.65 0.99 0.65 0.99 1.0 8.0 <0.001

Nonproductive behavior 0.06 0.24 0.06 0.24 1.0 8.0 <0.001

Cooperation 0.18 0.53 0.18 0.53 1.0 8.0 <0.001

TABLE 15

A Validity Analysis between the QFST and the FLSA

Page 21: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Rater l Rater 2

r

T

SD Parameter M SD M SD

Verbal communication 0.18 0.39 0.18 0.39 1.0 8.0 <0.001

Nonverbal communication 0.18 0.53 0.12 0.33 0.94 10.9 <0.001

Retention span 0.26 0.50 0.26 0.50 1.0 8.0 <0.001

Motor performance 0.29 0.47 0.29 0.47 1.0 8.0 <0.001

Attention span 0.35 0.70 0.38 0.70 1.0 22.0 <0.001

Money management skills 0.06 0.24 0.06 0.24 1.0 8.0 <0.001

Self-esteem 1.2 0.97 1.2 0.97 1.0 8.0 <0.001

Frustration tolerance 0.53 0.80 0.47 0.71 0.96 12.4 <0.001

Attention-seeking behavior 0.06 0.24 0.06 0.24 1.0 8.0 <0.001

Motivation 0.65 0.79 0.59 0.94 0.97 15.5 <0.001

Nonproductive behavior 0.06 0.24 0.06 0.24 1.0 8.0 <0.001

Cooperation 0.18 0.53 0.18 0.53 1.0 8.0 <0.001

TABLE 16

An Interrater Reliability Analysis of the QFST

Page 22: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Intervention Strategies

Test Retest

rho = 0.99

P < 0.001

X Rank X Rank

Team sports 7.6 5.5 7.6 6.5

Adventure sports 7.73 8 7.73 8

Individual/dual sports 9.73 13.5 9.73 14

Music 9.73 13.5 9.6 13

Art 9.13 11 9.13 12

Music/drama 7.86 9 8.0

9

Table games 7.53 7 7.46 6.5

Solitary games 7.46

5.5

7.40

5

Physical/skill games 6.6 4 6.6 4

Wood/tooling crafts 6.53 3 6.46 3

Clay crafts 6.53 3 6.46 3

Stitchery crafts 5.13 1 5.33 1

Entertainment 8.33 10 8.4 10

Pets 9.2 12 9.06 11

Outdoor recreation 11.33 15 11.33 15

TABLE 17

Rank Order Correlation of the Intervention Strategies

Page 23: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Development of the RPI App

Page 24: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Hands on experience

Page 25: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Please listen closely to the instructions I am about to give you. I will ask you to repeat them when I am finish. For this Activity, I would like you to: (1) select ”Activity Comparisons” from the menu, (2) review each of the activity groups as they appear on the screen, (3) select the one activity picture between the two groups on the screen that best represents your interest, and (4) continue the process until all the activity comparisons are complete. Please listen closely to the instructions I am about to give you. I will ask you to repeat them when I am finish. Now that you have completed your activity selection, I would like you to: (1) add the 3 numbers in the white boxes associated with each area and enter that number in the area yellow box, (2) enter the highest number from the five yellow area boxes in the yellow box associated with “High Score”, (3) enter the lowest number from the five yellow area boxes in the yellow box associated with “Low Score”, and (4) subtract the “Low Score” from the “High Score” and enter that number in the yellow box associated with “Activity Difference”.

Page 26: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Generated report

• How to generate a report• Sample report

Page 27: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Further development – we need your input!

• Update photos to represent activities that serve as good examples for each of the categories -based on different age ranges

Page 28: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

First steps….

• Divide in small groups (4-5) based on age• 35 and under

• 35-55

• 55 and over

• Within each group identify a writer

• Get ready as you will have 30 seconds to come up with activities your group thinks of as good examples for the given category

Page 29: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Categories

• Sports - Team

• Games – Table

• Expression – Music

• Crafts – Wood/Tooling

• Community Involvement-Entertainment

• Sports – Adventure

• Games – Solitary

• Expression – Art

• Crafts – Clay

• Community Involvement – Pets

• Sports – Individual/dual

• Games – Physical/Skill

• Expression – Dance

• Crafts – Stitchery

• Community Involvement – Outdoor Recreation

Page 30: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

Questions/Comments?Feel free to provide feedback after using the app to

Randy at [email protected]

Page 31: TR Assessments Moving From Paper & Pencil to iPads...Assessment Parameters M SD COTES Parameters M SD Stat is t ical Relatio nship r T p I. New learning 3.0 0.43 I. Initial learning

BACK

Recreational Assessment Results

Recreational Inventory Profile / Quick Functional Screening Test Roy H. Olsson Jr., PhD., CTRS, RTCR

Ruthie Kucharewski, PhD., CTRS

Date:

Client:

Client No.:

Assessment

and Plan:

9/8/2016

Randy

1

Cognitive / Communication Behavioral Skills

Attention Seeking Behavior 0

Attention Span 0

Cooperation Behavior 0

Frustration Tolerance 0

Money Management Skills 0

Motivation 0

Motor Performance 0

Non-Productive Behavior 0

Non-Verbal Communication 0

Retention Span (2 passes) N/A

Self-Esteem 0

Verbal Communication 0

O None

1 Mild 2 Moderate

3 Severe Dysfunction

4 to 5 Profound Dysfunction

Recreation Profile Intervention Strategies

Adventure 14

Assessment Indicators

Ability to Follow Directions

Decision Making Ability

Old Learning

No Problem

No Problem

No Problem

Team 13 Outdoor Recreation 12

Entertainment 11

Physical Skill 10

Table 8

Individual/Dual 7

Music 7

Pets 7

Art 6

Dance/Drama 3

Solitary 3

Wood/Tooling 3

Clay 1

Stitchery 0


Recommended