+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

Date post: 12-Sep-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
24
European Parliament, Committee on International Trade Hearing on Trade and Food Security, 10 July 2013 Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence? Jonathan Hepburn Programme Manager, Agriculture
Transcript
Page 1: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

European Parliament, Committee on International TradeHearing on Trade and Food Security, 10 July 2013

Trade and food security:Towards greater policy coherence?

Jonathan HepburnProgramme Manager, Agriculture

Page 2: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

1. Food security: how does it relate to trade?

ICTSD

Page 3: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

Ensuring food security requires coordinated action:on equity, the environment - and also trade

Source: FAO, Oct 2012. ICTSD

Undernourishment in the developing world

Photo: IPRD: http://iprd.org.uk/?p=6577

Page 4: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

Access and availability:trade policies must help reduce poverty

Source: ICTSD adaptation of graph based on FAO 2236data in Konandreas, P. (2012), “Trade Policy Responses to Food Price Volatility in Poor Net Food-Importing Countries”. http://ictsd.org/i/publications/134356/ ICTSD and FAO. ICTSD

19611963

19651967

19691971

19731975

19771979

19811983

19851987

19891991

19931995

19971999

20012003

20052007

1600

1800

2000

2200

2400

2600

2800World food supply (calories / person / day)

Foo

d:

Ca

lori

es

/ p

ers

on

/ d

ay

Average Dietary Energy Requirement at world level for 2005-07: 2236Kcal/person/day

"Food security existswhen all people, at all times,have physical, social and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food which meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life."

World Food Summit, 1996.

Page 5: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

Trade measures can affect different groups and individuals differently

ICTSD

For example:

* rural / urban

* net producer / consumer

* landowner, tenant farmer, landless labourer

Page 6: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

2. New food security challenges in global markets

ICTSD

Page 7: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

High and volatile prices: new challenges

Source: FAO food price index (real prices), May 2013

1/1

99

0

3/1

99

1

5/1

99

2

7/1

99

3

9/1

99

4

11

/19

95

1/1

99

7

3/1

99

8

5/1

99

9

7/2

00

0

9/2

00

1

11

/20

02

1/2

00

4

3/2

00

5

5/2

00

6

7/2

00

7

9/2

00

8

11

/20

09

1/2

01

1

3/2

01

2

5/2

01

3

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180FAO Food Price Index. 2002-04 = 100

ICTSD

Page 8: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

Projections: price trends set to continue

Source: OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook, 2012-2021 ICTSD

Page 9: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

Poor food-importing countriesespecially vulnerable

Source: Konandreas, P. (2012), “Trade Policy Responses to Food Price Volatility in Poor Net Food-Importing Countries”. http://ictsd.org/i/publications/134356/ ICTSD and FAO. Adapted by ICTSD from analysis by the author, based on FAO data. ICTSD

Net food importing developing countries (NFIDCs)

Least developed countries (LDCs)0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0

160.0

180.0

200.0

%

Share of food imports as % of total merchandise exports (1990-99)

Average 30%

Average61%maximum

maximum

minimum

minimum

Page 10: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

Biofuel blending mandates:Pushing up prices when yields are low

Source: Babcock, B (2011), "The Impact of US biofuel policies on agricultural price levels and volatility”. ICTSD, Geneva. http://ictsd.org/i/publications/108947/ ICTSD

Page 11: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

Food export restrictions:exacerbating shortages on world markets

Source: Headey, D, “Rethinking the global food crisis: the role of trade shocks”. IFPRI discussion paper 00958, March 2010

The effects of export restrictions on rice prices

ICTSD

Page 12: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

Climate change: trade can only partially offset growing food insecurity

Source: Adapted from Nelson et al, (2009), “The Role of International Trade in Climate Change Adaptation”. ICTSD and IPC. http://ictsd.org/i/publications/66988/Note: Assuming no carbon fertilisation under NCAR and CSIRO climate change scenarios. Figures given are to the nearest million.

Latin America and the Caribbean

Middle East and North Africa

Europe and Central Asia

East Asia and the Pacific

South Asia

Sub-Saharan Africa

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Increased no. of malnourished children by 2050 due to climate change

millions of additional malnourished under-5 children by 2050

ICTSD

Page 13: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

3. Boosting farm productivity: can trade policy help?

ICTSD

Page 14: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

Sustainable farm productivity growth needed to raise rural incomes and match growing demand

Source: The State of the World's Land and Water Resources for Food and Agriculture: Managing Systems at Risk (2011)

Southern America

South Asia

Northern Africa

Sub-Saharan Africa

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Actual crop yield (2005) as % of potential yield

ICTSD

Page 15: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

China: reporting rapid increase in minimally trade-distorting farm subsidies

Source: China's subsidy notifications to the WTO; ICTSD compilation. Domestic support in 2008 was RMB688bn (USD99bn), green box was RMB593bn. ICTSD

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 20080

100000

200000

300000

400000

500000

600000

700000

800000

'De minimis' trade-distorting support

Regional assistance programmes

Environmental programmes

Investment aids

Resource retirement programmes

Producer retirement programmes

Natural disaster relief

Income insurance / safety-nets

Decoupled income support

Domestic food aid

Food security stockholding

General services

RM

B y

uan (

mn)

Page 16: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

India: also rapidly increasing farm subsidies

Source: India's official notifications to the WTO; ICTSD compilation ICTSD

1998-9

9

1999-2

000

2000-0

1

2001-0

2

2002-0

3

2003-0

40

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

Environmental programmes

Investment aids

Natural disaster relief

Food security stockholding

General services

Input + investment subsidies for low-income, resource-poor producers

Support

, m

illio

n U

S$

Page 17: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

Aid to agriculture falls as share of total aid

Source: OECD. In Konandreas, P. (2012), “Trade Policy Responses to Food Price Volatility in Poor Net Food-Importing Countries”. ICTSD and FAO. http://ictsd.org/i/publications/134356/ ICTSD

Page 18: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

Support to farmers in the OECD: despite reforms, still around US$250bn p.a.

ICTSD

19861988

19901992

19941996

19982000

20022004

20062008

2010-50,000

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

OECDEuropean Union-27ChinaJapanUnited States

USD

(m

n)

Source: OECD data, adapted by ICTSD

Producer support estimate (USD): transfers to producers from taxpayers and consumers

Page 19: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

4. Strengthening global governance on trade and food security

ICTSD

Page 20: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

Improving coordination: domestically and internationally

ICTSD

* UN HLTF, revitalised CFS, G-20... some improvement in international coordination on trade + food security

* Still need to ensure policy coherence for development at domestic level, in developed and developing countries

Photo: Wikimedia commons, Presidency of the Nation of Argentina.G-20 summit, Cannes 2011.

Page 21: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

Bali MC9: an opportunity to ensure trade rules support food security?

ICTSD

Bali 'low ambition' - but ministers could seek to identify ways forward on trade and food security at 3 levels:

1). in the 'small package'

2). in the unresolved Doha agenda

3). in the new trade policy environment

Photo: Ammad Bahalim, ICTSD

Page 22: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

Towards more equitable and sustainable global markets

ICTSD

Beyond the trading system, effective regulatory frameworks are needed to:

1). internalise costs of maintaining environmental public goods (e.g. climate)

2). sustainably boost farm productivity in developing countries

3). provide targeted consumer subsidies to the poorest and most vulnerable people

Photo: UN News Centre. http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=39927#.UdWOmM5_4p8

Page 23: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

References:

Babcock, B. (2011), "The Impact of US biofuel policies on agricultural price levels and volatility”. ICTSD, Geneva. http://ictsd.org/i/publications/108947/

Clay, E. (2012), “Trade Policy Options for Enhancing Food Aid Effectiveness”. ICTSD, Geneva. http://ictsd.org/i/publications/133713/

FAO, (2011), “The State of the World's Land and Water Resources for Food and Agriculture: Managing Systems at Risk”. Routledge / Earthscan.

FAO, (2012), “The State of Food and Agriculture 2012”. FAO, Rome.

Headey, D. (2010), “Rethinking the global food crisis: the role of trade shocks”. IFPRI discussion paper 00958, March 2010

Hepburn, J (2012), “Food security and the multilateral trading system”. In Meléndez-Ortiz, Bellmann and Rodriguez Mendoza (eds), The Future and the WTO: Confronting the Challenges. 2012. http://ictsd.org/i/publications/138578/

Josling, T. (2011), “Global Food Stamps: An Idea Worth Considering?”. ICTSD, Geneva. http://ictsd.org/i/publications/111809/

Konandreas, P. (2012), “Trade Policy Responses to Food Price Volatility in Poor Net Food-Importing Countries”. ICTSD and FAO. http://ictsd.org/i/publications/134356/

Nelson et al, (2009), “The Role of International Trade in Climate Change Adaptation”. ICTSD and IPC. http://ictsd.org/i/publications/66988/

---------

More ICTSD analysis on trade and food security is online at: www.ictsd.org/programmes/agriculture/

ICTSD

Page 24: Trade and food security: Towards greater policy coherence?

Thank you.Jhepburn [at] ictsd.ch


Recommended