+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Trademarks IV Domain Names & Trademarks

Trademarks IV Domain Names & Trademarks

Date post: 02-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: charisse-lennox
View: 85 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Trademarks IV Domain Names & Trademarks. Class 23 Notes Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2004 Professor Wagner. Today’s Agenda. Domain Names & Trademarks The ACPA The UDRP Marks & ‘Net Governance. Domain Names & Trademarks. Quick overview of Domain Names - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
13
Trademarks IV Trademarks IV Domain Names & Trademarks Domain Names & Trademarks Class 23 Notes Class 23 Notes Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2004 Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2004 Professor Wagner Professor Wagner
Transcript

Trademarks IVTrademarks IVDomain Names & TrademarksDomain Names & Trademarks

Class 23 NotesClass 23 Notes

Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 20042004

Professor WagnerProfessor Wagner

22/11/11

Today’s AgendaToday’s Agenda

1.1. Domain Names & TrademarksDomain Names & Trademarks

a) The ACPA

b) The UDRP

c) Marks & ‘Net Governance

33/11/11

Domain Names & TrademarksDomain Names & Trademarks

Quick overview of Domain NamesQuick overview of Domain Names

1.1. Domain Names are an overlay to the Domain Names are an overlay to the internet networkinternet networka)They correspond to an “IP Address”

www.law.upenn.edu = 130.91.144.50

b)They are not necessary to use the ‘net; typing the ip address works just fine

c) When you type a domain name, your computer seeks to ‘resolve’ the name by querying ‘DNS servers’

44/11/11

55/11/11

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

66/11/11

Domain Names DisputesDomain Names Disputes

1.1. Why are there disputes over domain Why are there disputes over domain names?names?• Lack of namespace? (more than 96-characters

allowed)• Inability to find desired web sites?• Inability to determine desired from undesired

web sites?• Desire for short, easily-remembered name

(for marketing purposes)?• Control over references to your

goods/services?

2.2. What is What is cybersquattingcybersquatting? Should there be ? Should there be anything wrong with it?anything wrong with it?

77/11/11

Domain Names DisputesDomain Names Disputes

Three Basic ApproachesThree Basic Approaches1.1. Federal trademark lawsuit (typically dilution Federal trademark lawsuit (typically dilution

claim)claim)• Con: Required a series of awkward ‘stretches’

2.2. The ACPA (15 USC § 1125)The ACPA (15 USC § 1125)1. Allows claims for ‘bad faith registration’2. Cons:

• Jurisdictional problems• Federal litigation is expensive, time consuming• Federal courts are sensitive to 1st Amendment issues

3.3. The UDRPThe UDRP• Allows transfer when ‘bad faith’ exists• Cheaper and quicker than ACPA• No jurisdictional problems

88/11/11

The ACPAThe ACPA

Shields v ZuccariniShields v Zuccarini (3rd Cir. 2001) (3rd Cir. 2001)• What is it that Zuccarini did? (Is that really so

bad?)• What happened when someone visited Z’s sites?• What are the requirements for an ACPA claim?• Do you agree with the court that joecartoon.com

is famous?• Are misspellings ‘identical or confusingly

similar’?• Why is Z found to be acting in ‘bad faith’? Do

you agree? (Should a commercially-motivated use of the domain name really be an element of bad faith?)

99/11/11

The ACPAThe ACPA

PETA v DoughneyPETA v Doughney (4th Cir. 2001) (4th Cir. 2001)• Note the peta.org tagline: “A resource

for those who enjoy eating meat, wearing fur and leather, hunting, and the fruits of scientific research (and more!).”

• How did Doughney act in ‘bad faith’?

• Any practice tips (both for trademark holders and domain name holders) here?

1010/11/11

The UDRPThe UDRP

1.1. How does the UDRP become effective How does the UDRP become effective against all domain names?against all domain names?

2.2. Overview of the UDRP process:Overview of the UDRP process:• Trademark owner files a ‘complaint’ with

an approved dispute resolution provider, alleging ‘bad faith’ in registering the mark

• The respondent has a short period of time to respond (a majority do not)

• One (or sometimes three) ‘panelists; decide the case on the basis of the submissions

1111/11/11

The UDRPThe UDRPElements of a UDRP claim:Elements of a UDRP claim:

1. Identical/confusingly similarity between mark and domain name

2. No ‘legitimate rights’ in the domain name3. Registration and use in bad faith

Bad faith:Bad faith:1. Primary purpose of reselling domain name to the

complainant or a competitor of complainant2. Registration to prevent mark-holder from using the

name3. Registration to disrupt the business of a competitor4. Attempts to attract ‘net users, for commercial gain, by

creating a likelihood of confusion

Legitimate rightsLegitimate rights1. Use of domain name in bona fide business2. You have been known by the domain name3. Legitimate noncommercial fair use

1212/11/11

Marks and ‘Net GovernanceMarks and ‘Net Governance

1.1. How does the dispute over trademarks How does the dispute over trademarks and domain names implicate ‘net and domain names implicate ‘net governance?governance?

2.2. Are there other ways to deal with the Are there other ways to deal with the issue, aside from establishing a issue, aside from establishing a complex dispute-resolution process?complex dispute-resolution process?• Domain name inalienability• Repetitive domain name auctions• Massive reallocation of domain names• Domain name ‘reservation’ processes• Do nothing

1313/11/11

Next ClassNext Class

Intellectual Property & the Intellectual Property & the Constitution I Constitution I

Structural LimitationsStructural Limitations


Recommended