+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis...

Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis...

Date post: 19-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: doanthu
View: 223 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
80
Final Report Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development 635 Erb Street West, Waterloo, ON Prepared for L & B Canada Inc. by IBI Group October 11, 2017
Transcript
Page 1: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Final Report

Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development

635 Erb Street West, Waterloo, ON

Prepared for L & B Canada Inc. by IBI Group October 11, 2017

Page 2: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

Document Control Page

October 11, 2017

CLIENT: L & B Canada Inc.

PROJECT NAME: 635 Erb Street West

REPORT TITLE: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development

IBI REFERENCE: 102225

VERSION: 2.0

DIGITAL MASTER:

\\caneast.ibigroup.com\J\WT\102225_L&B_635ErbSt\5.9 Drawings\Traffic Study\Report\OUTBOUND\2017-10-11 Final\TTR_635 Erb St TIS_2017-10-11.docx

ORIGINATOR: Hugo Chan Quentin Ng

REVIEWER: Scott Johnston

AUTHORIZATION: Scott Johnston

CIRCULATION LIST:

HISTORY: 1.0 – Draft Report 2.0 – Final Report

Page 3: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

Table of Contents

October 11, 2017 i

1  Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 

2  Study Area ........................................................................................................................... 1 

2.1  Road Network .......................................................................................................... 2 

2.2  Transit Facilities ....................................................................................................... 3 

2.3  Proposed Land Use on Site ..................................................................................... 4 

3  Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................ 1 

3.1  Turning Movement Counts ...................................................................................... 1 

3.2  Existing Traffic Volumes .......................................................................................... 1 

3.3  Existing Traffic Operations ....................................................................................... 5 

4  2023 Future Background Conditions ................................................................................ 6 

4.1  Other Developments within Study Area ................................................................... 6 

4.2  2023 Future Background Traffic Operations ........................................................... 6 

5  Site-Generated Traffic ........................................................................................................ 9 

5.1  Site Access .............................................................................................................. 9 

5.2  Trip Generation ........................................................................................................ 9 

5.3  Trip Distribution ...................................................................................................... 10 

5.4  Site Trip Assignment .............................................................................................. 10 

6  2023 Future Total Traffic Conditions .............................................................................. 12 

7  Parking Review ................................................................................................................. 15 

8  Non-Auto Modes, Transit, Pedestrians, Bicycles .......................................................... 16 

9  Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 16 

Appendix A – Turning Movement Counts

Appendix B – Existing Traffic Conditions: Synchro Outputs

Appendix C – Region of Waterloo Erb Street West AADT Data

Appendix D – 2023 Future Background Traffic Conditions: Synchro Outputs

Page 4: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

Table of Contents (continued)

October 11, 2017 ii

Appendix E – 2023 Future Total Traffic Conditions: Synchro Outputs

Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams

Appendix G – Signal Warrant for Erb Street West / Westhaven Street Intersection

List of Exhibits

Exhibit 2-1: Study Area ...................................................................................................... 1 

Exhibit 2-2: Existing Lane Configuration ........................................................................ 2 

Exhibit 2-3: Transit Service Frequency ........................................................................... 3 

Exhibit 2-4: Study Area Transit Service Coverage ......................................................... 3 

Exhibit 2-5: Site Plan ......................................................................................................... 1 

Exhibit 3-1: Turning Movement Count Data .................................................................... 1 

Exhibit 3-2: Existing Traffic Volumes .............................................................................. 2 

Exhibit 3-3: Existing Truck Volumes ................................................................................ 3 

Exhibit 3-4: Existing Pedestrian Volumes ....................................................................... 4 

Exhibit 3-5: Existing Traffic Operations – Signalized Intersections ............................. 5 

Exhibit 3-6: Existing Traffic Operations – Unsignalized Intersections......................... 6 

Exhibit 4-1: Erb Street Annual Traffic Growth Rate........................................................ 6 

Exhibit 4-2: 2023 Future Background Traffic Volumes .................................................. 7 

Exhibit 4-3: 2023 Future Background Traffic Operations – Signalized Intersections . 8 

Exhibit 4-4: 2023 Future Background Traffic Operations – Unsignalized Intersections ..................................................................................................... 8 

Exhibit 5-1: Trip Generation Summary ............................................................................ 9 

Exhibit 5-2: Trip Distribution ........................................................................................... 10 

Exhibit 5-3: Site Traffic Volume Assignment ................................................................ 11 

Exhibit 6-1: 2023 Future Total Traffic Volumes ............................................................. 13 

Exhibit 6-2: 2023 Future Total Traffic Operations – Signalized Intersection Results 14 

Exhibit 6-3: 2023 Future Total Traffic Operations – Unsignalized Intersection Results ............................................................................................................ 15 

Page 5: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 1

1 Introduction

IBI Group was retained by L & B Canada to complete a traffic impact study (TIS) for a proposed development consisting of 297 apartment units and 38 stacked townhouse units, to be located at 635 Erb Street West (hereinafter referred to as the “subject site”, in Waterloo, Ontario. The nature of the application involves an official plan amendment and zoning by-law amendment.

The purpose of this report is to analyze potential traffic impacts to the study area caused by trips generated by the subject site, and evaluate the subject site’s proposed parking supply.

2 Study Area

Upon consultation with the Region of Waterloo and City of Waterloo, the following intersections were selected for analysis in this TIS:

Erb Street West / Westhaven Street (one-way stop controlled); and

Erb Street West / Erbsville Crescent (signal controlled).

The proposed development location and the study area intersections are illustrated in Exhibit 2-1. The site will have two accesses, one to West Hill Drive and a second to Westhaven Street.

Exhibit 2-1: Study Area

Legend Stop Sign Traffic Signal

Subject Site

Page 6: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 2

2.1 Road Network The roadways adjacent to study area are Erb Street West, West Hill Drive, Westhaven Street, and Erbsville Crescent.

Erb Street West is an east-west regional road with two lanes in each direction with a posted 60 km/hr speed limit. There is one signalized intersection within the study area, where Erb Street West and Erbsville Crescent intersects. Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the street, as well as marked curbside bicycle lanes in both directions. Erb Street West is served by Grand River Transit (GRT) iXpress Route 202 bus service.

West Hill Drive is a north-south local road with one lane in each direction. The north end of the road terminates south of Erb Street West, and intersects Ira needles Boulevard to the south. There are no sidewalk provisions and speed limits are not posted.

Westhaven Street is a north-south local road with one lane in each direction. The north end intersects with Erb Street West, and the south end terminates south of Westcroft Drive. Speed limits are unposted, and sidewalks are provided on the east side.

Erbsville Crescent is a north-south local road with one lane in each direction. The south end intersects with Erb Street West and is signal controlled with crosswalk markings. The posted speed limit is 50 km/hr, with sidewalks provided on both sides.

The existing lane configuration is shown in Exhibit 2-2.

Exhibit 2-2: Existing Lane Configuration

Page 7: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 3

2.2 Transit Facilities The subject site is located in an area served by Grand River Transit (GRT), with bus stops within walking distance at the Erb Street West / Erbsville Crescent intersection and the Erb Street West / Erbsville Road / Ira Needles Boulevard intersection. Exhibit 2-3 presents the service frequency obtained from the GRT website, and Exhibit 2-4 illustrates the GRT bus stop locations within the immediate study area. As noted below, transit service is frequent and accessible during the weekday peak hours.

Exhibit 2-3: Transit Service Frequency

Bus Route Peak Hour

Service Frequency Off Peak

Service Frequency Grand River Transit (GRT) iXpress – Route 202 (The

Boardwalk – Conestoga Mall) 10 minutes 30 minutes

Grand River Transit (GRT) iXpress – Route 29 (Keats

Way) 30 minutes 30 minutes

Exhibit 2-4: Study Area Transit Service Coverage

Legend

GRT Route 15

GRT Route 29

Subject Site

Page 8: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 4

2.3 Proposed Land Use on Site The subject site currently contains a vacant lot. The proposed layout of the site is for two apartment buildings with a total of 297 units, three stacked townhouse blocks providing 38 units, and 422 parking spaces (237 underground, 185 surface).

Access to the site is proposed via two driveways, located west to connect with the Westhill Drive northern roundabout, and east to connect with Westhaven Street. Both driveways will be configured to permit full movement operations. Surface and underground parking space access / egress will be possible via the two driveways using internal ramps. The current site plan is presented in Exhibit 2-5.

The subject site is to be completed and fully occupied under one phase, by the year 2023.

Page 9: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 1

Exhibit 2-5: Site Plan

Page 10: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 1

3 Existing Conditions

3.1 Turning Movement Counts Turning movement count data was provided by the Region of Waterloo for the study area intersections. This report’s studied peak hours were chosen to coincide with weekday AM and PM peak hours of traffic activity on the adjacent road, which is 8:00 AM – 9:00 AM for the AM peak hour, and 4:45 PM – 5:45 PM for the PM peak hour.

Due to the age of the data, a 4.4% growth rate obtained via AADT data provided by the Region of Waterloo (discussed in detail in Section 4.1) was used to determine 2017 current year volumes.

Exhibit 3-1 summarizes the dates of the turning movement counts collected for analysis.

Turning movement count data can be found in Appendix A.

Exhibit 3-1: Turning Movement Count Data

Intersection Date

Erb St W / Ira Needles Blvd / Erbsville Rd

Thursday, March 23, 2017 7:30 AM -10:00 AM 3:00 PM - 6:00 PM

Erb St W / Westhaven St Thursday, May 15, 2014

7:30 AM -10:30 AM 3:00 PM - 6:00 PM

Erb St W / Erbsville Crt Thursday, May 15, 2014

7:30 AM -10:30 AM 3:00 PM - 6:00 PM

3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes IBI Group used the turning movement counts detailed within Section 3.1 in order to establish a 2017 existing traffic conditions model. Exhibit 3-2 illustrates the weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes for the study area intersections. Exhibit 3-3 illustrates the truck specific volumes, while Exhibit 3-4 illustrates the pedestrian volumes.

Page 11: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 2

Exhibit 3-2: Existing Traffic Volumes

Page 12: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 3

Exhibit 3-3: Existing Truck Volumes

Page 13: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 4

Exhibit 3-4: Existing Pedestrian Volumes

Page 14: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 5

3.3 Existing Traffic Operations The intersections were analyzed using the Synchro 9.1 analysis package for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Levels of service (LOS) were calculated using the HCM methodology contained in Synchro for the studied intersections. LOS evaluation uses a six-letter grade scale (A to F) to rank vehicle delay at intersections. LOS ‘A’ indicates excellent traffic operations with minimal delays, while LOS ‘F’ represents conditions with long delays. Criteria for identifying critical intersections and movements are based on the Region of Waterloo Transportation Impact Study Guidelines (September 2013).

Exhibit 3-5 details existing traffic operations at the signalized Erb Street West / Erbsville Crescent intersection for the AM and PM peak hours. Synchro outputs are found in Appendix B. Note that for the analysis of the existing conditions, the peak hour factors (PHF) were calculated for each approach and carried forward to the future background and future total analysis.

Based on the analysis of the AM and PM peak hours, the intersection was observed to have overall acceptable operations during both peak periods.The queues did not exceed the storage length and all movements in the study area operate at an acceptable LOS with no critical movements.

Exhibit 3-5: Existing Traffic Operations – Signalized Intersections

LOS DelayV/C

RatioMovement LOS Delay (s) V/C Ratio

95th Percentile Queue (m)

Storage Capacity

(m)

EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50

EBT A 6.6 0.34 42 -

WBT A 5.8 0.21 21 -

SBL D 54.0 0.79 42 55

SBR C 32.5 0.07 12 -

EBL A 4.3 0.16 7 50

EBT A 3.5 0.19 17 -

WBT A 4.8 0.43 43 -

SBL D 50.0 0.59 18 55

SBR D 38.0 0.03 10 -

Erb St W & Erbsville Ct

A 6.7 0.44

Movement

PM Peak Hour

AM Peak Hour

Intersection

Intersection

Erb St W & Erbsville Ct

B 12.9 0.41

Page 15: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 6

Exhibit 3-6 displays the existing traffic operations at the Westhaven Street / Erb Street West unsignalized intersection for the AM and PM peak hours. For both peak periods, overall traffic operations are acceptable. No queues exceed the storage length and all movements in the study area operate at an acceptable LOS with no critical movements.

Exhibit 3-6: Existing Traffic Operations – Unsignalized Intersections

4 2023 Future Background Conditions

In accordance with the City of Waterloo TIS Guidelines and after a pre-consultation meeting with the City of Waterloo and the Region of Waterloo, the City of Waterloo has requested a horizon year of five from the date of the TIS (i.e. 2023).

4.1 Other Developments within Study Area Upon consultation with the Region of Waterloo, existing 2017 and forecasted 2027 AADT values pertaining to Erb Street were provided to IBI Group (Exhibit 4-1), with the raw data provided in Appendix C. It was determined by the Region that the annual traffic growth rate, 4.4%, calculated using the AADT values, will account for future development traffic and growth in the study area.

Exhibit 4-1: Erb Street Annual Traffic Growth Rate

On Erb Street (Ira Needles Blvd to Westhaven St)

Year AADT Annual Traffic Growth

2017 13600 4.4%

2027 20900

4.2 2023 Future Background Traffic Operations To provide a basis for comparison with existing conditions, the 2023 future background traffic operation analysis will consist of corridor traffic growth discussed in Section 4.1. Exhibit 4-2 illustrates 2023 future background traffic volumes into the study area during the weekday AM and PM peak hours.

Intersection Delay (s) LaneLane LOS

Control Delay (s)

Approach LOS

V/C Ratio

Queue, 95th (m)

Storage Length

(m)

WBL A 9.6 0.3 0.02 1 45.0

NBL/R C 18.7 C 0.18 5 -

WBL A 8.6 - 0.04 1 45.0

NBL/R C 17.8 C 0.14 4 -

AM Peak Hour

PM Peak Hour

Westhaven St & Erb St W

1.2

Westhaven St & Erb St W

0.8

Page 16: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 7

Exhibit 4-2: 2023 Future Background Traffic Volumes

Page 17: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 8

The exhibits below detail 2023 future background traffic operations at the study area intersections. Specifically, Exhibit 4-3 summarizes signalized intersection operations in the study area during the AM and PM peak hours. Synchro outputs are provided in Appendix D.

Similar to the existing conditions, the signalized intersection in the study area will operate well with LOS B or better during both peak hours. Additionally, there are no critical movements anticipated, as all movements operate at LOS D or better.

Exhibit 4-3: 2023 Future Background Traffic Operations – Signalized Intersections

Regarding unsignalized operations at the Westhaven Street / Erb Street West intersection under 2023 future background conditions, Exhibit 4-4 summarizes unsignalized operations. Overall and individual movement LOS is anticipated to be acceptable, with no critical operations observed. All queue lengths are anticipated to be within storage capacity.

Exhibit 4-4: 2023 Future Background Traffic Operations – Unsignalized Intersections

LOS DelayV/C

RatioMovement LOS Delay (s) V/C Ratio

95th Percentile Queue (m)

Storage Capacity

(m)

EBL A 6.2 0.18 13 50

EBT A 7.5 0.45 59 -

WBT A 6.2 0.28 29 -

SBL D 54.0 0.79 42 55

SBR C 32.5 0.07 12 -

EBL A 5.7 0.23 8 50

EBT A 3.8 0.24 23 -

WBT A 5.8 0.55 63 -

SBL D 50.0 0.59 18 55

SBR D 38.0 0.03 10 -

Erb St W & Erbsville Ct

A 7 0.55

Erb St W & Erbsville Ct

B 12.2 0.5

Movement

AM Peak Hour

PM Peak Hour

Intersection

Intersection

Intersection Delay (s) LaneLane LOS

Control Delay (s)

Approach LOS

V/C Ratio

Queue, 95th (m)

Storage Length

(m)

WBL B 10.7 - 0.03 1 45.0

NBL/R D 27.1 D 0.28 9 -

WBL A 9.1 - 0.05 1 45.0

NBL/R C 23.8 C 0.20 6 -

AM Peak Hour

PM Peak Hour

Westhaven St & Erb St W

1.3

Westhaven St & Erb St W

0.8

Page 18: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 9

5 Site-Generated Traffic

The proposed residential development will consist of 297 apartment units and 38 stacked townhouse units. Two full movement site connections are proposed on the west and east sides of the lot.

5.1 Site Access Access to the site will be via two full movement stop controlled driveways, intersecting with Westhill Drive to the west, and Westhaven Street to the east, illustrated in Exhibit 2-5.

Surface and underground parking space access / egress will be possible via the two driveways using internal ramps.

5.2 Trip Generation The ITE Trip Generation manual was used to estimate vehicle trips generated during the weekday AM and PM peak hours of the adjacent street, summarized below in Exhibit 5-1. Trip generation consisted of the proposed apartment (ITE land use code 220) and townhouse (ITE land use code 230) units.

Exhibit 5-1: Trip Generation Summary

Land Use Unit Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak HourIN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL

Apartment 297 units

(Land Use ITE Code 220)

Trips/Unit 0.78 3.14 3.92 3.09 1.67 4.76% 20% 80% 100% 65% 35% 100%

Trips 30 119 149 118 63 181

Townhouse 38 units

(Land Use ITE Code 230)

Trips/Unit 0.11 0.52 0.63 0.48 0.23 0.71% 17% 83% 100% 67% 33% 100%

Trips 4 20 24 18 9 27

Total Trips 34 139 173 136 72 208

During the AM peak hour and PM peak hour, a total of 300 and 375 site trips are estimated, respectively.

Page 19: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 10

5.3 Trip Distribution To distribute the trips forecasted to be generated by the subject site, the existing traffic patterns during the weekday AM and PM peak hours were analyzed using the adjacent road network (i.e. Erb Street West / Ira Needles Boulevard / Erbsville Road four legged roundabout). Using this method, Exhibit 5-2 summarizes the trip distribution to apply to the new subject site trips.

Exhibit 5-2: Trip Distribution

Origin / Destination % Distribution

AM Peak PM Peak To / From North: via Erbsville Rd

31% 25%

To / From South: via Ira Needles Blvd

29% 32%

To / From East: via Erb St W

13% 22%

To / From West: via Erb St W

27% 21%

Total 100% 100%

5.4 Site Trip Assignment Based on the proposed site connectivity and the placement of the resident parking spaces, the assignment of site traffic is provided below in Exhibit 5-3 .

Page 20: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 11

Exhibit 5-3: Site Traffic Volume Assignment

Page 21: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 12

6 2023 Future Total Traffic Conditions

IBI Group added the 2023 future background traffic volumes to the forecasted trips generated by the subject site to establish 2023 future total traffic volumes. This is to correlate with the opening year (assumed to be five years from the date of this report). The 2023 future total volumes shown in Exhibit 6-1.

This analysis is based on the assumption that the existing one-way stop control will be maintained at the unsignalized Erb Street West / Westhaven Street intersection, such that no traffic signal will be installed and left turn movements will be occur when there is sufficient gaps in traffic.

Page 22: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 13

Exhibit 6-1: 2023 Future Total Traffic Volumes

Page 23: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 14

The exhibits below summarize 2023 future total traffic operations at the studied intersections. Exhibit 6-2 summarizes AM and PM peak operations at the signalized Erb Street West / Erbsville Crescent intersection. Synchro outputs are provided in Appendix E. Queuing comparisons of existing and future total traffic operations are illustrated in Appendix F.

For the weekday AM and PM peak hours, it is anticipated that the intersection will operate well for both peak periods with overall LOS B or better, with no critical operations observed for individual movements. Site related traffic impacts to the intersection operations will be marginal and all queues are anticipated to be comparable to 2023 future background conditions, with a increase of up to four metres for individual movements.

Exhibit 6-2: 2023 Future Total Traffic Operations – Signalized Intersection Results

Unsignalized operations for the Westhaven Street / Erb Street West intersection are summarized below in Exhibit 6-3.

During the AM peak hour, following is noted:

For the northbound approach is anticipated to operate with up to 71 seconds of delay (LOS F) due to higher outbound site traffic. For a stop controlled intersection, such delays are considered typical at busier roadways. When observing the anticipated residual capacity (V/C ratio of 0.78) and 95th percentile queue length (40 metre), queues are not expected to spill past Westhaven Street, located 45 metres south. Therefore, operations are deemed acceptable in this context.

In response to potential capacity constraints for the northbound left movement, drivers can choose to exit via the subject site’s western driveway, which would involve making an eastbound right turn onto Ira Needles Boulevard, then west on Erb Street West via the roundabout.

During the PM peak hour, acceptable overall intersection and specific movement operations are anticipated, with no capacity constraints.

As a sensitivity analysis, a signal warrant was conducted for this intersection using the OTM Book 12 Section 4.10 Justification 7 (Projected Volumes) methodology. Via this method, calculations required in Table 19 of the book are summarized in Appendix G. Based on the results of the signal warrant, both Justification 1 (98% compliance) and

LOS DelayV/C

RatioMovement LOS Delay (s) V/C Ratio

95th Percentile Queue (m)

Storage Capacity

(m)

EBL A 6.2 0.18 13 50

EBT A 7.6 0.46 61 -

WBT A 6.2 0.28 30 -

SBL D 54.0 0.79 42 55

SBR C 32.5 0.07 12 -

EBL A 6.0 0.24 8 50

EBT A 3.8 0.25 23 -

WBT A 6.0 0.56 66 -

SBL D 50.0 0.59 18 55

SBR D 38.1 0.05 10 -

Erb St W & Erbsville Ct

A 7.0 0.56

Erb St W & Erbsville Ct

B 12.2 0.51

MovementIntersection

AM Peak Hour

PM Peak Hour

Intersection

Page 24: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 15

Justification 2 (84% compliance) do not meet the 120% fulfillment criteria. It is also noted that OTM Book 12 Section 3.7 (Signal spacing) suggests a distance of 215 metres between signalized intersections at a posted speed of 60 km/hr for motorists to recognize and react to each device.

Exhibit 6-3: 2023 Future Total Traffic Operations – Unsignalized Intersection Results

7 Parking Review

A review of City of Waterloo By-law parking requirements was conducted to determine if the proposed parking provisions are compliant. The following documents were referenced:

City of Waterloo Existing Zoning By-law Parking Standards;

City of Waterloo Draft New Zoning By-law (April 18, 2017)1; and

City of Waterloo Draft Parking Overlay – Parking Rate Adjustments Schedule A1 (March 20, 2017)2.

The subject property is currently zoned Multiple Residential Twelve (MR-12) by the City of Waterloo’s Zoning By-Law (in-effect). The Zoning By-Law requires a minimum parking provision of 1.25 parking spaces per residential unit. Given this standard, a minimum of 419 parking spaces would be required to accommodate the proposed development concept. As the development proposes 422, the parking requirements of the Zoning By-law are met.

It is also noted that the City of Waterloo is currently undertaking a review of its Zoning By-law, and although not yet in effect, it is prudent to consider future changes to the site’s zoning. Specifically, the City has proposed new “Residential Mixed Use 40” zoning for the site. This RMU zoning requires a minimum of 1.25 parking spaces per dwelling unit, which equates to 419 spaces. In addition to this, 0.10 visitor parking spaces per dwelling unit is to be required (34 visitors spaces), leading to an overall total parking requirement of 453 spaces.

Furthermore, the City’s draft Zoning By-law includes a Draft Parking Overlay (Schedule A1), which provides for as-of-right parking reductions. The subject site resides in Parking Area F, where 90% of the existing By-law’s minimum required parking spaces is deemed sufficient.

1 City of Waterloo, “Draft Zoning Map”, (April 18, 2017), http://www.waterloo.ca/en/contentresources/resources/business/ZBR2_schedule-A.pdf 2 City of Waterloo, “Draft Parking Overlay – Parking Rate Adjustments Schedule A1”, (March 20 2017), http://www.waterloo.ca/en/contentresources/resources/business/ZBR2_scheduleA1.pdf.

Intersection Delay (s) LaneLane LOS

Control Delay (s)

Approach LOS

V/C Ratio

Queue, 95th (m)

Storage Length

(m)

WBL B 10.8 - 0.03 1 45.0

NBL/R F 60.7 F 0.73 36 -

WBL A 9.4 - 0.09 2 45.0

NBL/R D 30.9 D 0.40 14 -

AM Peak Hour

PM Peak Hour

Westhaven St & Erb St W

4.8

Westhaven St & Erb St W

1.6

Page 25: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 16

Therefore, a reduced supply of 377 and 31 residential and visitor parking spaces, totaling 408 spaces, would be required. With a proposed supply of 422 parking spaces proposed, the proposed supply also meets the minimum requirements of the draft new Zoning By-Law.

8 Non-Auto Modes, Transit, Pedestrians, Bicycles

Based on the traffic data obtained, the study area road network and facilities, as well as the proposed site plan, the roadway is anticipated to be able accommodate additional non-auto modes of travel in the study area. The assessment is based on the following:

Sidewalks facilities: Erb Street West and the surrounding road network has sidewalks that residents of the subject site can utilize to reach transit services and nearby amenities. Traffic data collected indicates minimal pedestrian activity in the study area. Pedestrian connections to the subject site are proposed via two doorways facing Erb Street West, and one pathway facing the Westhill Drive roundabout. Erb Street West crossing opportunities are present via the Erbsville Crescent signalized intersection to the east, and the roundabout to the west.

Bicycle facilities: Erb Street West has curbside painted bicycle lanes in both directions that residents can utilize. Existing traffic data indicate there is currently no bicycle activity in the study area. The subject site will contain bicycle storage in the basement level on the west side of the property, which residents can access via a basement entry point facing the Westhill Drive roundabout.

Transit facilities: Residents are within walking distance of GRT Bus Route #15, as mentioned in Section 2.1.

9 Conclusions

This report examined the potential impacts to the study area caused by the proposed development consisting of 297 apartment units and 38 stacked townhouse units, located at 635 Erb Street West.

Background traffic analysis under existing conditions shows that all study area intersections are anticipated to operate with acceptable LOS with no critical movements. This is seen throughout all future background analysis as all intersections operate with overall LOS B or better.

Site traffic for the proposed development was calculated based on the ITE trip generation manual rates. The development generates 173 trips (34 entering, 139 exiting) in the AM peak hour and 208 trips (136 entering, 72 exiting) in the PM peak hour.

In the horizon year of 2023, acceptable traffic operations are expected at the Erb Street West / Erbsville Court signalized intersection during both weekday AM and PM peak hours with no critical movements. During the AM peak hour at the unsignalized intersection of Erb Street West at Westhaven Street, the northbound approach is anticipated to operate with LOS F due to the site generated outbound traffic. However, the movement has sufficient residual capacity, and alternative routes for exiting site traffic, operations here are considered acceptable.

Page 26: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared for L & B Canada Inc.

October 11, 2017 17

A parking review was also conducted to determine if the proposed parking provisions are compliant with the City’s By-law parking requirements. According to the Draft Zoning Map, the subject site resides in an area designated as mixed-use residential (RMU), specifically labelled as “RMU-40”. A minimum of 419 residential parking spaces and 34 visitor parking spaces is required, totalling 453 spaces. However, based on the Draft Parking Overlay Schedule A1, the subject site is eligible for a 10% required parking space reduction. Therefore, with a proposed supply of 422 parking spaces, the proposed supply meets the minimum By-law required supply of 408 spaces.

Based on a review of the study area road network, facilities, and the proposed site plan, the roadway is anticipated to be able accommodate additional non-auto modes of travel generated by the subject site within in the study area.

Page 27: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Appendix A – Turning Movement Counts

Page 28: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Count Period Peak HourFrom: From:

To: To:

Municipality:Intersection: GeoID:

Count Date:Major Road:

356 % Trks 1% 0% 0% Heavys 1 1,049239 Heavys 1 0 0 1 Trucks 0 33912 Trucks 0 0 0 0 Cars 116 1

Cars 92 0 146 238 Total 117

Total 93 0 146

Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks

15 3 377 395 37 37 0 0 0%302 285 3 14 6%0 0 0 0 0%

322 3 14W E

% Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total

1% 1 0 79 803% 13 4 547 5640% 0 0 0 0 Cars Trucks Heavys Total

14 4 626 693 4 13 710

Total 0 0 07 Heavys 0 Cars 0 0 0 0 0

644 Trucks 0 Trucks 0 0 0 0 01,039 Cars 0 Heavys 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 % Trks 0% 0% 0%

To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during morning peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total enteringTherefore, total vehicles entering intersection =

Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turnTherefore, vehicles entering from the west =

North Peds:

Morning Peak Diagram

WaterlooErb St & Erbsville CrtSignalizedControl:

West Entering:

West leg Total:

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Erb St

West Peds:

644

S

Erbsville Crt

Comments

1,222

North Leg Total:

North Entering:

8:15 AM9:15 AM

Thursday, 15-May-14

East Leg Total:

Weather conditions:4405

7:30 AM10:30 AM

Rain

Peds Cross:

South leg Total:

Peds Cross:

Peds Cross:

N/A

Erb St

N

East Entering:

East Peds:

ATPerson(s) who counted:

South Peds:

South Entering:

Peds Cross:

Erb St

Page 29: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Count Period Peak HourFrom: From:

To: To:

Municipality:Intersection: GeoID:

Count Date:Major Road:

83 % Trks 0% 0% 0% Heavys 0 82247 Heavys 0 0 0 0 Trucks 0 4342 Trucks 0 0 0 0 Cars 36 0

Cars 21 0 26 47 Total 36

Total 21 0 26

Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks

14 6 411 431 24 24 0 0 0%410 390 6 14 5%0 0 0 0 0%

414 6 14W E

% Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total

0% 0 0 12 126% 14 6 342 3620% 0 0 0 0 Cars Trucks Heavys Total

14 6 354 368 6 14 388

Total 0 0 01 Heavys 0 Cars 0 0 0 0 0

374 Trucks 0 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0805 Cars 0 Heavys 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 % Trks 0% 0% 0%

To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during mid-day peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total enteringTherefore, total vehicles entering intersection =

Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turnTherefore, vehicles entering from the west =

Mid-day Peak Diagram

Control:

North Entering:

North Leg Total:

Erb St

Erbsville Crt

Erb St

Peds Cross:

374

South Entering:

855

AT

S

Waterloo

Signalized

Weather conditions:

East Entering:

East Peds:

West Entering:

West leg Total:

West Peds:

South leg Total:

N

North Peds:

4405Erb St & Erbsville Crt RainThursday, 15-May-14

Person(s) who counted:

Peds Cross:

South Peds:

East Leg Total:

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

12:00 PM2:00 PM

12:30 PM1:30 PM

Peds Cross:

Peds Cross:

N/A

Erb St

Comments

Page 30: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Count Period Peak HourFrom: From:

To: To:

Municipality:Intersection: GeoID:

Count Date:Major Road:

185 % Trks 0% 0% 0% Heavys 1 1,23487 Heavys 0 0 0 0 Trucks 0 8247 Trucks 0 0 0 0 Cars 97 0

Cars 44 0 43 87 Total 98

Total 44 0 43

Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks

5 2 813 820 48 47 0 1 2%776 769 2 5 1%0 0 0 0 0%

816 2 6W E

% Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total

0% 0 0 50 503% 8 2 357 3670% 0 0 0 0 Cars Trucks Heavys Total

8 2 407 400 2 8 410

Total 0 0 03 Heavys 0 Cars 0 0 0 0 0

417 Trucks 0 Trucks 0 0 0 0 01,237 Cars 0 Heavys 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 % Trks 0% 0% 0%

To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during afternoon peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total enteringExample 1: Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection =

Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turnTherefore, vehicles entering from the west = 417

1,328

Peds Cross:

Erbsville Crt

S

North Entering:

Person(s) who counted:

Erb St

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Control:

South Peds:West Peds:

East Peds:

3:00 PM

North Leg Total:

Afternoon Peak Diagram6:00 PM

Erb St & Erbsville CrtSignalized

4:45 PM

AT

Rain

North Peds:

Comments

Peds Cross: Peds Cross:

Peds Cross:

West leg Total:

West Entering:

Thursday, 15-May-14

South leg Total:

South Entering:

East Leg Total:

Weather conditions:

Erb St

N

N/A

Erb St

Waterloo

East Entering:

5:45 PM

4405

Page 31: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Municipality:Intersection: GeoID:

Count Date:Major Road:

North Leg Total: 1,407 East Leg Total: 7,511North Entering: 839 % Trks 2% 0% 0% Heavys 7 East Entering: 3,858

North Peds: 43 Heavys 7 0 2 9 Trucks 3 East Peds: 3Trucks 1 0 0 1 Cars 558 Peds Cross:

Bicycles Entering: 1 Cars 384 0 445 829 Total 568 Bicycles Entering: 1Buggies Entering: 0 Total 392 0 447 Buggies Entering: 0

Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks

97 41 3,840 3,978 272 268 1 3 1%3,586 3,456 40 90 4%

0 0 0 0 0%3,724 41 93

W E

% Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total

2% 4 2 290 2965% 107 45 3,054 3,2060% 0 0 0 0 Cars Trucks Heavys Total

111 47 3,344 3,499 45 109 3,653

Total 0 0 0 Peds Cross:

27 Heavys 0 Cars 0 0 0 0 South Peds: 03,502 Trucks 0 Trucks 0 0 0 0 South Entering: 07,480 Cars 0 Heavys 0 0 0 0 South leg Total: 0

Bicycles Entering: 3 Total 0 % Trks 0% 0% 0% Bicycles Entering: 0Buggies Entering: 0 Buggies Entering: 0

To determine total vehicles entering the intersection, add all leg totals entering. Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total entering

Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection =Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turn

Therefore, vehicles entering from the west =

Notes:

8,199

Person(s) who counted:

S

Signalized

WaterlooErb St & Erbsville Crt

None

AT

3,502

West leg Total:

N/A

Peds Cross:

Erb St

Comments

Erb St

Rain

Erb St

Peds Cross:

Control:4405

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Total Count Diagram

West Entering:

West Peds:

N

Erbsville Crt

Thursday, 15-May-14

Weather conditions:

Page 32: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Total Factor = Monthly Factor 1 x Daily Factor 1 x 24 Hour Factor 1.74 =

Municipality:Intersection: GeoID:

Count Date:Major Road:

2,448 % Trks 2% 0% 0% Heavys 12 13,0691,460 Heavys 12 0 3 16 Trucks 5 6,713N/A Trucks 2 0 0 2 Cars 971 N/A

Cars 668 0 774 1,442 Total 988

Total 682 0 778

Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks

169 71 6,682 6,922 473 466 2 5 1%6,240 6,013 70 157 4%

0 0 0 0 0%6,480 71 162

W E

% Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total

2% 7 3 505 5155% 186 78 5,314 5,5780% 0 0 0 0 Cars Trucks Heavys Total

193 82 5,819 6,088 78 190 6,356

Total 0 0 0N/A Heavys 0 Cars 0 0 0 0 N/A

6,093 Trucks 0 Trucks 0 0 0 0 013,015 Cars 0 Heavys 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 % Trks 0% 0% 0%

To determine the EDT (Estimated Daily Traffic), add all four leg totals and divide by two. This will give you the approximate number of vehicles entering and exiting the intersection in a 24-hour period

Example: (West leg total + South leg total + East leg total + North leg total)

East Leg Total:

Waterloo

Control:

1.740000

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Weather conditions:

ATPerson(s) who counted:

RainErb St & Erbsville CrtSignalized

South Peds:

West Entering: South Entering:

S

Peds Cross:

EDT = 14,266

East Peds:

Peds Cross:

West leg Total: South leg Total:

Comments

2

West Peds:

North Entering:

Erbsville Crt

East Entering:

N

N/A

Erb StErb St

Estimated Daily Traffic

North Peds:

North Leg Total:

Erb St

4405Thursday, 15-May-14

Peds Cross: Peds Cross:

Page 33: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Municipality:Intersection: GeoID:

Count Date:Major Road:

AM Peak: 0.87 AM Peak: 0.80Mid-day Peak: 0.69 Mid-day Peak: 0.94

PM Peak: 0.75 PM 0.61 0.00 0.67 PM Peak: 0.98MID 0.75 0.00 0.54

AM 0.89 0.00 0.83

AM AM Peak HourMID Mid-day Peak Hour AM MID PM

PM PM Peak Hour 0.77 0.86 0.800.79 0.92 0.990.00 0.00 0.00

W E

PM MID AM

0.74 0.50 0.560.98 0.85 0.850.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 AMAM Peak: 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 MID AM Peak: 0.00

Mid-day Peak: 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 PM Mid-day Peak: 0.00PM Peak: 0.97 PM Peak: 0.00

West Approach PHF

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

East Approach PHF

Control:

Waterloo

Mo

vem

en

t

Erb St & Erbsville CrtSignalized Thursday, 15-May-14Erb St

4405Weather conditions:

Rain

South Approach PHF

Movement

Mo

vem

en

t

ATPerson(s) who counted:

North Approach PHF

Erbsville Crt

Movement

N/A

Comments

Erb St

N

Erb St

S

Peak Hour Factor By Movement

Page 34: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Intersection: Intersection Control:GeoID: Date:

Municipality: Name: ATMajor Road: Weather: Rain

Approach Control Signalized Signalized N/A SignalizedMovement LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT

Approach Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 < 0 0 0 1 0 1 TOTAL

7:30 to 7:45 1 96 0 0 36 4 0 0 0 7 0 8 1527:45 to 8:00 8 133 0 0 66 5 0 0 0 10 0 15 2378:00 to 8:15 7 152 0 0 46 9 0 0 0 24 0 25 2638:15 to 8:30 12 166 0 0 58 4 0 0 0 29 0 18 2878:30 to 8:45 28 145 0 0 68 12 0 0 0 31 0 24 3088:45 to 9:00 36 147 0 0 96 10 0 0 0 42 0 26 3579:00 to 9:15 4 106 0 0 80 11 0 0 0 44 0 25 2709:15 to 9:30 6 89 0 0 68 6 0 0 0 15 0 6 1909:30 to 9:45 2 107 0 0 81 4 0 0 0 8 0 1 2039:45 to 10:00 5 97 0 0 84 4 0 0 0 4 0 2 196

10:00 to 10:15 1 82 0 0 71 4 0 0 0 6 0 6 17010:15 to 10:30 0 80 0 0 83 7 0 0 0 8 0 2 180

8:15 to 9:15 80 564 0 0 302 37 0 0 0 146 0 93 1,222# of trucks in peak 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7

# of heavies in peak 1 13 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29% heavies (Total) 1% 3% 0% 0% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 3%

12:00 to 12:15 6 82 0 0 90 3 0 0 0 8 0 6 19512:15 to 12:30 9 96 0 0 108 8 0 0 0 3 0 7 23112:30 to 12:45 2 98 0 0 98 6 0 0 0 3 0 2 20912:45 to 13:00 6 73 0 0 104 7 0 0 0 12 0 5 20713:00 to 13:15 3 85 0 0 97 7 0 0 0 6 0 7 20513:15 to 13:30 1 106 0 0 111 4 0 0 0 5 0 7 23413:30 to 13:45 4 66 0 0 94 5 0 0 0 4 0 5 17813:45 to 14:00 8 93 0 0 100 4 0 0 0 2 0 11 218

12:30 to 13:30 12 362 0 0 410 24 0 0 0 26 0 21 855# of trucks in peak 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12

# of heavies in peak 0 14 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28% heavies (Total) 0% 6% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5%

15:00 to 15:15 13 86 0 0 125 10 0 0 0 4 0 15 25315:15 to 15:30 16 80 0 0 127 17 0 0 0 12 0 17 26915:30 to 15:45 15 99 0 0 139 16 0 0 0 35 0 27 33115:45 to 16:00 14 99 0 0 133 9 0 0 0 24 0 21 30016:00 to 16:15 13 107 0 0 141 14 0 0 0 27 0 20 32216:15 to 16:30 6 93 0 0 164 2 0 0 0 14 0 12 29116:30 to 16:45 14 90 0 0 177 14 0 0 0 8 0 17 32016:45 to 17:00 12 94 0 0 196 15 0 0 0 10 0 12 33917:00 to 17:15 17 90 0 0 193 10 0 0 0 11 0 18 33917:15 to 17:30 8 90 0 0 191 12 0 0 0 16 0 6 32317:30 to 17:45 13 93 0 0 196 11 0 0 0 6 0 8 32717:45 to 18:00 6 86 0 0 165 18 0 0 0 9 0 11 295

16:45 to 17:45 50 367 0 0 776 48 0 0 0 43 0 44 1,328# of trucks in peak 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

# of heavies in peak 0 8 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 14% heavies (Total) 0% 3% 0% 0% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1%

WaterlooErb St

NORTHBOUNDWESTBOUNDEASTBOUND

1,289

1,233

SOUTHBOUND

1,3211,328

1,215

1,1251,020859

1,222

842

759

1,284

Erb St & Erbsville Crt SignalizedThursday, 15-May-14

PM Peak Hour

749

4405

852855

AM Peak Hour

Midday Peak Hour

824835

939

1,153

1,2441,222

1,095

1,272

TOTALHOUR

Page 35: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Intersection: Intersection Control:GeoID: Date:

Municipality: Name: ATMajor Road: Weather: Rain

7:30 to 7:457:45 to 8:008:00 to 8:158:15 to 8:308:30 to 8:458:45 to 9:009:00 to 9:159:15 to 9:309:30 to 9:459:45 to 10:00

10:00 to 10:1510:15 to 10:30

8:15 to 9:15

12:00 to 12:1512:15 to 12:3012:30 to 12:4512:45 to 13:0013:00 to 13:1513:15 to 13:3013:30 to 13:4513:45 to 14:00

12:30 to 13:30

15:00 to 15:1515:15 to 15:3015:30 to 15:4515:45 to 16:0016:00 to 16:1516:15 to 16:3016:30 to 16:4516:45 to 17:0017:00 to 17:1517:15 to 17:3017:30 to 17:4517:45 to 18:00

16:45 to 17:45 100730

116

0

0

2 103 100 3 0

0

1

6

0 80

173

4

0 8

2

163 190

02 1

0 1 2 0

1 1 1

015

0 4 0 0 4 91

2 8 0

00

1010 1 0

9

234

0000

0 1

7

0

0

1716

70

0

0

00

0 3 4

7

0 3

0

0 0 0 0

0 1 1

0

0

0

0 1 2

0

0

AM Peak Hour

Midday Peak Hour

0 0

1

PM Peak Hour

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

00 0 0

1 0

3

4 5

0 0

1 2

12

0 1

0 0

2 00 1 0

0

2

00

0

10 2

0

01

20

0 2 0 2 60

0 411

3

0 1

0

0 1 1

TimeTOTALEast App. West App. North App. South App.

12

Thursday, 15-May-14

0

TOTAL HOUR

20

0

0

00

0

0

0

0

00

Crossing Approach

Erb St & Erbsville Crt

WaterlooErb St

Signalized

1

0

4405

00

0

0 2

1

00

0

0

0

0

1

4

0 2

20

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING

Page 36: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Count Period Peak HourFrom: From:

To: To:

Municipality:Intersection: GeoID:

Count Date:Major Road:

0 % Trks 0% 0% 0% Heavys 0 1,0420 Heavys 0 0 0 0 Trucks 0 3470 Trucks 0 0 0 0 Cars 0 0

Cars 0 0 0 0 Total 0

Total 0 0 0

Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks

14 2 349 365 0 0 0 0 0%332 317 2 13 5%15 15 0 0 0%

332 2 13W E

% Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total

0% 0 0 0 03% 15 4 637 6568% 1 0 11 12 Cars Trucks Heavys Total

16 4 648 676 4 15 695

Total 33 0 390 Heavys 1 Cars 32 0 39 71 1

668 Trucks 0 Trucks 0 0 0 0 721,033 Cars 26 Heavys 1 0 0 1 99

Total 27 % Trks 3% 0% 0%

To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during morning peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total enteringTherefore, total vehicles entering intersection =

Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turnTherefore, vehicles entering from the west =

North Peds:

Morning Peak Diagram

WaterlooErb St & Westheaven StNon SignalizedControl:

West Entering:

West leg Total:

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Erb St

West Peds:

668

S

N/A

Comments

1,087

North Leg Total:

North Entering:

8:00 AM9:00 AM

Thursday, 15-May-14

East Leg Total:

Weather conditions:32463

7:30 AM10:30 AM

Rain

Peds Cross:

South leg Total:

Peds Cross:

Peds Cross:

Westheaven St

Erb St

N

East Entering:

East Peds:

ATPerson(s) who counted:

South Peds:

South Entering:

Peds Cross:

Erb St

Page 37: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Count Period Peak HourFrom: From:

To: To:

Municipality:Intersection: GeoID:

Count Date:Major Road:

0 % Trks 0% 0% 0% Heavys 0 8050 Heavys 0 0 0 0 Trucks 0 4310 Trucks 0 0 0 0 Cars 0 0

Cars 0 0 0 0 Total 0

Total 0 0 0

Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks

14 6 424 444 0 0 0 0 0%424 404 6 14 5%7 7 0 0 0%

411 6 14W E

% Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total

0% 0 0 0 05% 14 6 345 3659% 0 1 10 11 Cars Trucks Heavys Total

14 7 355 354 6 14 374

Total 20 0 90 Heavys 0 Cars 20 0 9 29 0

376 Trucks 1 Trucks 0 0 0 0 29820 Cars 17 Heavys 0 0 0 0 47

Total 18 % Trks 0% 0% 0%

To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during mid-day peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total enteringTherefore, total vehicles entering intersection =

Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turnTherefore, vehicles entering from the west =

Mid-day Peak Diagram

Control:

North Entering:

North Leg Total:

Erb St

N/A

Erb St

Peds Cross:

376

South Entering:

836

AT

S

Waterloo

Non Signalized

Weather conditions:

East Entering:

East Peds:

West Entering:

West leg Total:

West Peds:

South leg Total:

N

North Peds:

32463Erb St & Westheaven St RainThursday, 15-May-14

Person(s) who counted:

Peds Cross:

South Peds:

East Leg Total:

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

12:00 PM2:00 PM

12:30 PM1:30 PM

Peds Cross:

Peds Cross:

Westheaven St

Erb St

Comments

Page 38: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Count Period Peak HourFrom: From:

To: To:

Municipality:Intersection: GeoID:

Count Date:Major Road:

0 % Trks 0% 0% 0% Heavys 0 1,2370 Heavys 0 0 0 0 Trucks 0 8200 Trucks 0 0 0 0 Cars 0 0

Cars 0 0 0 0 Total 0

Total 0 0 0

Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks

5 2 806 813 0 0 0 0 0%781 774 2 5 1%39 39 0 0 0%

813 2 5W E

% Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total

0% 0 0 0 03% 8 2 390 4000% 0 0 24 24 Cars Trucks Heavys Total

8 2 414 407 2 8 417

Total 32 0 170 Heavys 0 Cars 32 0 17 49 0

424 Trucks 0 Trucks 0 0 0 0 491,237 Cars 63 Heavys 0 0 0 0 112

Total 63 % Trks 0% 0% 0%

To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during afternoon peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total enteringExample 1: Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection =

Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turnTherefore, vehicles entering from the west = 424

1,293

Peds Cross:

N/A

S

North Entering:

Person(s) who counted:

Erb St

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Control:

South Peds:West Peds:

East Peds:

3:00 PM

North Leg Total:

Afternoon Peak Diagram6:00 PM

Erb St & Westheaven StNon Signalized

4:45 PM

AT

Rain

North Peds:

Comments

Peds Cross: Peds Cross:

Peds Cross:

West leg Total:

West Entering:

Thursday, 15-May-14

South leg Total:

South Entering:

East Leg Total:

Weather conditions:

Erb St

N

Westheaven St

Erb St

Waterloo

East Entering:

5:45 PM

32463

Page 39: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Municipality:Intersection: GeoID:

Count Date:Major Road:

North Leg Total: 0 East Leg Total: 7,461North Entering: 0 % Trks 0% 0% 0% Heavys 0 East Entering: 3,956

North Peds: 2 Heavys 0 0 0 0 Trucks 0 East Peds: 0Trucks 0 0 0 0 Cars 0 Peds Cross:

Bicycles Entering: 0 Cars 0 0 0 0 Total 0 Bicycles Entering: 2Buggies Entering: 0 Total 0 0 0 Buggies Entering: 0

Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks

97 36 3,874 4,007 0 0 0 0 0%3,819 3,689 35 95 3%137 136 0 1 1%

3,825 35 96W E

% Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total

0% 0 0 0 05% 111 42 3,218 3,3714% 4 2 129 135 Cars Trucks Heavys Total

115 44 3,347 3,350 43 112 3,505

Total 188 0 134 Peds Cross:

0 Heavys 5 Cars 185 0 132 317 South Peds: 83,506 Trucks 2 Trucks 1 0 1 2 South Entering: 3227,513 Cars 265 Heavys 2 0 1 3 South leg Total: 594

Bicycles Entering: 3 Total 272 % Trks 2% 0% 1% Bicycles Entering: 2Buggies Entering: 0 Buggies Entering: 0

To determine total vehicles entering the intersection, add all leg totals entering. Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total entering

Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection =Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turn

Therefore, vehicles entering from the west =

Notes:

7,784

Person(s) who counted:

S

Non Signalized

WaterlooErb St & Westheaven St

None

AT

3,506

West leg Total:

Westheaven St

Peds Cross:

Erb St

Comments

Erb St

Rain

Erb St

Peds Cross:

Control:32463

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Total Count Diagram

West Entering:

West Peds:

N

N/A

Thursday, 15-May-14

Weather conditions:

Page 40: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Total Factor = Monthly Factor 1 x Daily Factor 1 x 24 Hour Factor 1.74 =

Municipality:Intersection: GeoID:

Count Date:Major Road:

0 % Trks 0% 0% 0% Heavys 0 12,9820 Heavys 0 0 0 0 Trucks 0 6,883

N/A Trucks 0 0 0 0 Cars 0 N/ACars 0 0 0 0 Total 0

Total 0 0 0

Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks

169 63 6,741 6,972 0 0 0 0 0%6,645 6,419 61 165 3%238 237 0 2 1%

6,656 61 167W E

% Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total

0% 0 0 0 05% 193 73 5,599 5,8664% 7 3 224 235 Cars Trucks Heavys Total

200 77 5,824 5,829 75 195 6,099

Total 327 0 233N/A Heavys 9 Cars 322 0 230 552 N/A

6,100 Trucks 3 Trucks 2 0 2 3 56013,073 Cars 461 Heavys 3 0 2 5 1,034

Total 473 % Trks 2% 0% 1%

To determine the EDT (Estimated Daily Traffic), add all four leg totals and divide by two. This will give you the approximate number of vehicles entering and exiting the intersection in a 24-hour period

Example: (West leg total + South leg total + East leg total + North leg total)

East Leg Total:

Waterloo

Control:

1.740000

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Weather conditions:

ATPerson(s) who counted:

RainErb St & Westheaven StNon Signalized

South Peds:

West Entering: South Entering:

S

Peds Cross:

EDT = 13,544

East Peds:

Peds Cross:

West leg Total: South leg Total:

Comments

2

West Peds:

North Entering:

N/A

East Entering:

N

Westheaven St

Erb St Erb St

Estimated Daily Traffic

North Peds:

North Leg Total:

Erb St

32463Thursday, 15-May-14

Peds Cross: Peds Cross:

Page 41: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Municipality:Intersection: GeoID:

Count Date:Major Road:

AM Peak: 0.00 AM Peak: 0.74Mid-day Peak: 0.00 Mid-day Peak: 0.91

PM Peak: 0.00 PM 0.00 0.00 0.00 PM Peak: 0.97MID 0.00 0.00 0.00

AM 0.00 0.00 0.00

AM AM Peak HourMID Mid-day Peak Hour AM MID PM

PM PM Peak Hour 0.00 0.00 0.000.74 0.91 0.970.75 0.58 0.98

W E

PM MID AM

0.00 0.00 0.000.97 0.87 0.880.55 0.55 0.75

0.75 0.00 0.61 AMAM Peak: 0.87 0.50 0.00 0.75 MID AM Peak: 0.67

Mid-day Peak: 0.89 0.80 0.00 0.61 PM Mid-day Peak: 0.60PM Peak: 0.95 PM Peak: 0.82

West Approach PHF

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

East Approach PHF

Control:

Waterloo

Mo

vem

en

t

Erb St & Westheaven StNon Signalized Thursday, 15-May-14Erb St

32463Weather conditions:

Rain

South Approach PHF

Movement

Mo

vem

en

t

ATPerson(s) who counted:

North Approach PHF

N/A

Movement

Westheaven St

Comments

Erb St

N

Erb St

S

Peak Hour Factor By Movement

Page 42: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Intersection: Intersection Control:GeoID: Date:

Municipality: Name: ATMajor Road: Weather: Rain

Approach Control Free Flow Free Flow Stop Control N/AMovement LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT

Approach Lanes 0 2 < 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 TOTAL

7:30 to 7:45 0 94 2 1 39 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 1427:45 to 8:00 0 143 3 1 82 0 8 0 2 0 0 0 2398:00 to 8:15 0 145 1 3 69 0 9 0 11 0 0 0 2388:15 to 8:30 0 169 3 3 69 0 6 0 5 0 0 0 2558:30 to 8:45 0 155 4 4 82 0 11 0 16 0 0 0 2728:45 to 9:00 0 187 4 5 112 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 3229:00 to 9:15 0 101 1 4 101 0 7 0 9 0 0 0 2239:15 to 9:30 0 91 4 4 69 0 7 0 4 0 0 0 1799:30 to 9:45 0 104 4 2 79 0 6 0 5 0 0 0 2009:45 to 10:00 0 97 4 3 84 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 198

10:00 to 10:15 0 81 2 4 73 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 16610:15 to 10:30 0 77 1 1 84 0 5 0 3 0 0 0 171

8:00 to 9:00 0 656 12 15 332 0 33 0 39 0 0 0 1,087# of trucks in peak 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6

# of heavies in peak 0 15 1 0 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 30% heavies (Total) 0% 3% 8% 0% 5% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3%

12:00 to 12:15 0 84 5 3 93 0 7 0 4 0 0 0 19612:15 to 12:30 0 104 4 3 112 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 22712:30 to 12:45 0 98 5 3 97 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 21512:45 to 13:00 0 77 5 2 107 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 19713:00 to 13:15 0 85 0 1 103 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 19613:15 to 13:30 0 105 1 1 117 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 22813:30 to 13:45 0 68 10 4 95 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 18413:45 to 14:00 0 98 1 3 108 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 216

12:30 to 13:30 0 365 11 7 424 0 20 0 9 0 0 0 836# of trucks in peak 0 6 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13

# of heavies in peak 0 14 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28% heavies (Total) 0% 5% 9% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5%

15:00 to 15:15 0 95 5 3 136 0 5 0 3 0 0 0 24715:15 to 15:30 0 91 9 7 136 0 8 0 5 0 0 0 25615:30 to 15:45 0 107 10 5 159 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 29115:45 to 16:00 0 107 8 7 147 0 5 0 4 0 0 0 27816:00 to 16:15 0 118 1 5 155 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 28616:15 to 16:30 0 98 4 4 172 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 28316:30 to 16:45 0 103 5 7 187 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 30716:45 to 17:00 0 101 4 10 198 0 10 0 5 0 0 0 32817:00 to 17:15 0 100 11 10 201 0 8 0 7 0 0 0 33717:15 to 17:30 0 96 4 9 188 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 30417:30 to 17:45 0 103 5 10 194 0 9 0 3 0 0 0 32417:45 to 18:00 0 89 5 5 171 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 279

16:45 to 17:45 0 400 24 39 781 0 32 0 17 0 0 0 1,293# of trucks in peak 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

# of heavies in peak 0 8 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13% heavies (Total) 0% 3% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1%

WaterlooErb St

NORTHBOUNDWESTBOUNDEASTBOUND

1,255

1,154

SOUTHBOUND

1,2761,293

1,087

996924800

1,072

835

743

1,244

Erb St & Westheaven St Non SignalizedThursday, 15-May-14

PM Peak Hour

735

32463

835836

AM Peak Hour

Midday Peak Hour

805824

874

1,072

1,1381,111

1,004

1,204

TOTALHOUR

Page 43: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Intersection: Intersection Control:GeoID: Date:

Municipality: Name: ATMajor Road: Weather: Rain

7:30 to 7:457:45 to 8:008:00 to 8:158:15 to 8:308:30 to 8:458:45 to 9:009:00 to 9:159:15 to 9:309:30 to 9:459:45 to 10:00

10:00 to 10:1510:15 to 10:30

8:00 to 9:00

12:00 to 12:1512:15 to 12:3012:30 to 12:4512:45 to 13:0013:00 to 13:1513:15 to 13:3013:30 to 13:4513:45 to 14:00

12:30 to 13:30

15:00 to 15:1515:15 to 15:3015:30 to 15:4515:45 to 16:0016:00 to 16:1516:15 to 16:3016:30 to 16:4516:45 to 17:0017:00 to 17:1517:15 to 17:3017:30 to 17:4517:45 to 18:00

16:45 to 17:45 00000

00

0

0

0 00 00 0 0

0

0

0

0 00

00

0

0 0

0

00 00

00 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0

01

0 0 0 0 0 00

0 0 1

00

100 0 0

1

000

0100

0 0

0

0

0

21

00

1

0

00

0 0 0

0

0 0

0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0

0

0

0

0 0 0

0

0

AM Peak Hour

Midday Peak Hour

0 0

0

PM Peak Hour

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

00 0 0

0 0

0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0

0 0

0 0

0 00 0 0

0

4

00

0

00 0

0

00

2

0 2 1 3 60

1 13

0

0 0

0

0 0 0

TimeTOTALEast App. West App. North App. South App.

2

Thursday, 15-May-14

0

TOTAL HOUR

00

0

0

20

0

2

0

0

10

Crossing Approach

Erb St & Westheaven St

WaterlooErb St

Non Signalized

1

0

32463

00

0

0 0

0

00

1

0

0

0

0

3

1 6

1

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING

Page 44: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Count Period Peak HourFrom: From:

To: To:

Municipality:Intersection: GeoID:

Count Date:Major Road:

1,693 % Trks 5% 3% 1% Heavys 17 1,124909 Heavys 1 13 2 16 Trucks 8 3660 Trucks 2 5 1 8 Cars 759 10

Cars 52 606 227 885 Total 784

Total 55 624 230

Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks

11 6 347 364 107 104 0 3 3%146 139 3 4 5%113 107 2 4 5%

350 5 11W E

% Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total

3% 2 2 140 1442% 3 5 388 3962% 4 1 223 228 Cars Trucks Heavys Total

9 8 751 742 6 10 758

Total 163 533 1323 Heavys 21 Cars 156 515 127 798 7

768 Trucks 8 Trucks 1 6 0 7 8281,132 Cars 936 Heavys 6 12 5 23 1,793

Total 965 % Trks 4% 3% 4%

To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during morning peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total enteringTherefore, total vehicles entering intersection =

Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turnTherefore, vehicles entering from the west =

AT06-NSPerson(s) who counted:

South Peds:

South Entering:

Peds Cross:

Erb St

Ira Needles Blvd

East Entering:

East Peds:

Peds Cross:

South leg Total:

Thursday, 23-Mar-17

East Leg Total:

Peds Cross:

Peds Cross:

Weather conditions:29541

7:30 AM10:30 AM

Sunny

8:00 AM9:00 AM

768

S

Erbsville Rd

Comments

N

West Entering:

West leg Total:

North Peds:

2,871

Morning Peak Diagram

WaterlooErb St & Ira Needles Blvd/Erbsville RdNon SignalizedControl:

North Leg Total:

North Entering:

Erb St

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Erb St

West Peds:

Page 45: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Count Period Peak HourFrom: From:

To: To:

Municipality:Intersection: GeoID:

Count Date:Major Road:

1,403 % Trks 1% 3% 1% Heavys 23 1,123710 Heavys 0 8 0 8 Trucks 6 5900 Trucks 1 7 1 9 Cars 664 4

Cars 79 449 165 693 Total 693

Total 80 464 166

Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks

13 9 737 759 101 97 1 3 4%340 327 6 7 4%149 142 3 4 5%

566 10 14W E

% Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total

4% 5 2 170 1774% 2 10 260 2728% 13 10 281 304 Cars Trucks Heavys Total

20 22 711 515 12 6 533

Total 339 415 950 Heavys 25 Cars 331 397 90 818 4

753 Trucks 20 Trucks 2 3 1 6 8491,512 Cars 872 Heavys 6 15 4 25 1,766

Total 917 % Trks 2% 4% 5%

To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during mid-day peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total enteringTherefore, total vehicles entering intersection =

Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turnTherefore, vehicles entering from the west =

Peds Cross:

Peds Cross:

Ira Needles Blvd

Erb St

Comments

12:45 PM1:45 PM

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

12:00 PM2:00 PM

East Leg Total:

West Peds:

South leg Total:

N

North Peds:

Peds Cross:

South Peds:

Thursday, 23-Mar-1729541Erb St & Ira Needles Blvd/Erbsville Rd Sunny

2,902

AT06-NS

S

East Entering:

East Peds:

West Entering:

West leg Total:

Person(s) who counted:

Waterloo

Non Signalized

Weather conditions:

North Entering:

North Leg Total:

Mid-day Peak Diagram

Control:

Erb St

Erbsville Rd

Erb St

Peds Cross:

753

South Entering:

Page 46: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Count Period Peak HourFrom: From:

To: To:

Municipality:Intersection: GeoID:

Count Date:Major Road:

2,190 % Trks 1% 2% 2% Heavys 12 1,4541,011 Heavys 1 10 1 12 Trucks 3 856

0 Trucks 1 3 2 6 Cars 1,164 3Cars 149 661 183 993 Total 1,179

Total 151 674 186

Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks

3 9 1,004 1,016 141 140 0 1 1%528 522 5 1 1%187 180 2 5 4%

842 7 7W E

% Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total

1% 0 2 217 2190% 1 0 267 2683% 3 8 336 347 Cars Trucks Heavys Total

4 10 820 589 3 6 598

Total 337 819 14410 Heavys 18 Cars 333 807 139 1,279 8834 Trucks 13 Trucks 3 1 1 5 1,300

1,850 Cars 1,177 Heavys 1 11 4 16 2,508Total 1,208 % Trks 1% 1% 3%

To determine total vehicles entering the intersection during afternoon peak hour, add all leg totals entering.

Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total enteringExample 1: Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection =

Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turnTherefore, vehicles entering from the west =

Erb St

N

Ira Needles Blvd

Erb St

Waterloo

East Entering:

5:15 PM

29541Weather conditions:

South Entering:

East Leg Total:

Comments

Peds Cross: Peds Cross:

West leg Total:

West Entering:

North Peds:

South leg Total:

South Peds:West Peds:

4:15 PM

AT06-NS

SunnyThursday, 23-Mar-17Control:

3:00 PM

North Leg Total:

Afternoon Peak Diagram6:00 PM

Erb St & Ira Needles Blvd/Erbsville RdNon Signalized

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Peds Cross:

Erbsville Rd

S

North Entering:

Person(s) who counted:

East Peds:

Peds Cross:

834

4,001

Erb St

Page 47: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Municipality:Intersection: GeoID:

Count Date:Major Road:

North Leg Total: 13,124 East Leg Total: 8,887North Entering: 6,703 % Trks 2% 3% 2% Heavys 125 East Entering: 4,458

North Peds: 3 Heavys 7 82 8 97 Trucks 61 East Peds: 43Trucks 13 31 13 57 Cars 6,235 Peds Cross:

Bicycles Entering: 2 Cars 801 4,401 1,347 6,549 Total 6,421 Bicycles Entering: 1Buggies Entering: 0 Total 821 4,514 1,368 Buggies Entering: 0

Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks

81 100 5,469 5,650 838 823 4 11 2%2,480 2,414 39 27 3%1,140 1,095 9 36 4%

4,332 52 74W E

% Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total

3% 17 20 1,344 1,3813% 17 38 2,056 2,1114% 40 44 2,186 2,270 Cars Trucks Heavys Total

74 102 5,586 4,307 57 65 4,429

Total 2,349 4,202 950 Peds Cross:

42 Heavys 158 Cars 2,254 4,068 904 7,226 South Peds: 505,762 Trucks 84 Trucks 48 37 6 91 South Entering: 7,50111,412 Cars 7,682 Heavys 47 97 40 184 South leg Total: 15,425

Bicycles Entering: 0 Total 7,924 % Trks 4% 3% 5% Bicycles Entering: 0Buggies Entering: 0 Buggies Entering: 0

To determine total vehicles entering the intersection, add all leg totals entering. Example 1: Total Entering = West leg total entering + South leg total entering + East leg total entering + North leg total entering

Therefore, total vehicles entering intersection =Example 2: Total vehicles entering from the west = eastbound left turn + eastbound through + eastbound right turn

Therefore, vehicles entering from the west =

Notes:

Weather conditions:

West Peds:

N

Erbsville Rd

Thursday, 23-Mar-17Sunny 29541

Erb StControl:

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

Total Count Diagram

West leg Total:

Ira Needles Blvd

Erb St

Peds Cross:

West Entering:

Peds Cross:

Erb St

Comments

5,762

24,424

Person(s) who counted:

S

Non Signalized

WaterlooErb St & Ira Needles Blvd/Erbsville Rd

None

AT06-NS

Page 48: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Total Factor = Monthly Factor 1 x Daily Factor 1 x 24 Hour Factor 1.74 =

Municipality:Intersection: GeoID:

Count Date:Major Road:

22,836 % Trks 2% 3% 2% Heavys 218 15,46311,663 Heavys 12 143 14 169 Trucks 106 7,757

N/A Trucks 23 54 23 99 Cars 10,849 N/ACars 1,394 7,658 2,344 11,395 Total 11173

Total 1,429 7,854 2,380

Heavys Trucks Cars Total Total Cars Trucks Heavys % Trks

141 174 9,516 9,831 1,458 1,432 7 19 2%4,315 4,200 68 47 3%1,984 1,905 16 63 4%

7,538 90 129W E

% Trks Heavys Trucks Cars Total

3% 30 35 2,339 2,4033% 30 66 3,577 3,6734% 70 77 3,804 3,950 Cars Trucks Heavys Total

129 177 9,720 7,494 99 113 7,706

Total 4,087 7,311 1,653N/A Heavys 275 Cars 3,922 7,078 1,573 12,573 N/A

10,026 Trucks 146 Trucks 84 64 10 158 13,05219,857 Cars 13,367 Heavys 82 169 70 320 26,840

Total 13,788 % Trks 4% 3% 5%

To determine the EDT (Estimated Daily Traffic), add all four leg totals and divide by two. This will give you the approximate number of vehicles entering and exiting the intersection in a 24-hour period

Example: (West leg total + South leg total + East leg total + North leg total)

Peds Cross: Peds Cross:

N

Ira Needles Blvd

Erb StErb St

Estimated Daily Traffic

North Peds:

North Entering:

Erbsville Rd

East Entering:

S

Peds Cross:

West leg Total: South leg Total:

Comments

2

West Peds: South Peds:

West Entering: South Entering:

North Leg Total:

Non SignalizedErb St

EDT = 42,498

East Peds:

Peds Cross:

East Leg Total:

Waterloo Weather conditions:

AT06-NSPerson(s) who counted:

SunnyErb St & Ira Needles Blvd/Erbsville Rd

1.740000

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

29541Thursday, 23-Mar-17Control:

Page 49: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Municipality:Intersection: GeoID:

Count Date:Major Road:

AM Peak: 0.88 AM Peak: 0.87Mid-day Peak: 0.89 Mid-day Peak: 0.93

PM Peak: 0.93 PM 0.84 0.92 0.86 PM Peak: 0.85MID 0.77 0.86 0.86

AM 0.86 0.86 0.87

AM AM Peak HourMID Mid-day Peak Hour AM MID PM

PM PM Peak Hour 0.72 0.84 0.730.83 0.91 0.880.81 0.85 0.87

W E

PM MID AM

0.93 0.89 0.690.81 0.93 0.870.86 0.88 0.90

0.87 0.92 0.69 AMAM Peak: 0.84 0.83 0.93 0.88 MID AM Peak: 0.95

Mid-day Peak: 0.94 0.85 0.93 0.77 PM Mid-day Peak: 0.90PM Peak: 0.88 PM Peak: 0.92

Peak Hour Factor By Movement

Erb St

N

Erb St

S

Ira Needles Blvd

Comments

South Approach PHF

Movement

AT06-NS

29541

North Approach PHF

Weather conditions:

Erbsville Rd

Non Signalized Thursday, 23-Mar-17Erb St Person(s) who counted:

Mo

vem

en

t

Sunny

Mo

vem

en

t

Erb St & Ira Needles Blvd/Erbsville Rd

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT

East Approach PHF

Control:

Waterloo

Movement

West Approach PHF

Page 50: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Intersection: Intersection Control:GeoID: Date:

Municipality: Name: AT06-NSMajor Road: Weather: Sunny

Approach Control Yield Control Yield Control Yield Control Yield ControlMovement LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT

Approach Lanes > 2 < > 2 < LANES 1 1 LANES 1 1 TOTAL

7:30 to 7:45 31 53 56 16 20 17 30 101 18 26 122 21 5117:45 to 8:00 32 80 68 22 28 19 31 137 36 54 158 21 6868:00 to 8:15 31 94 62 25 28 22 36 145 25 50 131 13 6628:15 to 8:30 52 114 63 29 34 37 42 137 33 52 158 13 7648:30 to 8:45 33 99 50 24 40 22 47 118 26 62 182 13 7168:45 to 9:00 28 89 53 35 44 26 38 133 48 66 153 16 7299:00 to 9:15 25 57 72 36 42 24 43 87 19 46 127 20 5989:15 to 9:30 20 46 46 28 42 26 57 104 12 38 150 28 5979:30 to 9:45 22 54 47 31 47 12 51 78 21 57 99 14 5339:45 to 10:00 17 47 42 24 50 17 73 79 27 33 100 24 533

10:00 to 10:15 30 45 63 26 53 23 72 63 20 26 124 20 56510:15 to 10:30 37 39 69 30 51 11 86 81 32 30 113 25 604

8:00 to 9:00 144 396 228 113 146 107 163 533 132 230 624 55 2,871# of trucks in peak 2 5 1 2 3 0 1 6 0 1 5 2 28

# of heavies in peak 2 3 4 4 4 3 6 12 5 2 13 1 59% heavies (Total) 3% 2% 2% 5% 5% 3% 4% 3% 4% 1% 3% 5% 3%

12:00 to 12:15 52 41 60 39 68 20 100 125 36 43 100 12 69612:15 to 12:30 55 53 83 39 87 17 82 100 27 52 127 13 73512:30 to 12:45 44 63 61 30 75 10 100 99 22 28 130 16 67812:45 to 13:00 50 65 86 40 87 27 63 112 23 38 116 16 72313:00 to 13:15 42 73 73 35 77 22 89 92 26 48 103 14 69413:15 to 13:30 47 67 69 44 93 22 102 106 27 40 135 24 77613:30 to 13:45 38 67 76 30 83 30 85 105 19 40 110 26 70913:45 to 14:00 57 65 66 34 57 27 83 91 27 42 103 26 678

12:45 to 13:45 177 272 304 149 340 101 339 415 95 166 464 80 2,902# of trucks in peak 2 10 10 3 6 1 2 3 1 1 7 1 47

# of heavies in peak 5 2 13 4 7 3 6 15 4 0 8 0 67% heavies (Total) 4% 4% 8% 5% 4% 4% 2% 4% 5% 1% 3% 1% 4%

15:00 to 15:15 53 57 69 57 72 35 89 132 24 52 134 29 80315:15 to 15:30 68 73 63 35 99 28 80 148 38 36 148 35 85115:30 to 15:45 51 69 95 46 91 29 94 133 35 34 184 31 89215:45 to 16:00 46 73 88 46 119 33 104 125 38 31 177 25 90516:00 to 16:15 37 56 83 34 107 30 88 179 41 47 162 25 88916:15 to 16:30 59 73 91 37 131 39 72 211 44 39 170 35 1,00116:30 to 16:45 54 83 101 45 128 28 79 193 34 54 141 45 98516:45 to 17:00 51 57 80 51 119 26 99 195 19 44 179 32 95217:00 to 17:15 55 55 75 54 150 48 87 220 47 49 184 39 1,06317:15 to 17:30 48 65 87 38 144 31 91 195 28 30 175 56 98817:30 to 17:45 55 61 96 34 119 37 61 197 43 39 150 44 93617:45 to 18:00 61 78 77 46 95 43 95 181 35 42 169 50 972

16:15 to 17:15 219 268 347 187 528 141 337 819 144 186 674 151 4,001# of trucks in peak 2 0 8 2 5 0 3 1 1 2 3 1 28

# of heavies in peak 0 1 3 5 1 1 1 11 4 1 10 1 39% heavies (Total) 1% 0% 3% 4% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% 1% 2%

AM Peak Hour

Midday Peak Hour

2,828

3,827

2,8302,871

3,451

3,6873,537

2,235

29541

2,9022,857

3,959

Erb St & Ira Needles Blvd/Erbsville R Non SignalizedThursday, 23-Mar-17

PM Peak Hour

TOTALHOUR

2,623

4,001

3,780

SOUTHBOUND

3,9883,939

2,871

2,6402,4572,261

2,807

2,832

2,228

NORTHBOUNDWESTBOUNDEASTBOUND

WaterlooErb St

Page 51: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Intersection: Intersection Control:GeoID: Date:

Municipality: Name: AT06-NSMajor Road: Weather: Sunny

7:30 to 7:457:45 to 8:008:00 to 8:158:15 to 8:308:30 to 8:458:45 to 9:009:00 to 9:159:15 to 9:309:30 to 9:459:45 to 10:00

10:00 to 10:1510:15 to 10:30

8:00 to 9:00

12:00 to 12:1512:15 to 12:3012:30 to 12:4512:45 to 13:0013:00 to 13:1513:15 to 13:3013:30 to 13:4513:45 to 14:00

12:45 to 13:45

15:00 to 15:1515:15 to 15:3015:30 to 15:4515:45 to 16:0016:00 to 16:1516:15 to 16:3016:30 to 16:4516:45 to 17:0017:00 to 17:1517:15 to 17:3017:30 to 17:4517:45 to 18:00

16:15 to 17:15

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING

0

3301

0

20

1

29541

21

0

2 3

TimeTOTALEast App. West App. North App. South App.

Crossing Approach

TOTAL HOUR

60 3 0

Erb St & Ira Needles Blvd/Erbsville Rd

WaterlooErb St

Non SignalizedThursday, 23-Mar-17

30 0

0

9

32

1

207

622

22

01

1 5

17

16

2

0 0

23

1 1 2 10 210

0 0

0

0 0

3

0 0 0

2 0 0

0 0

0 0

0

0 0

AM Peak Hour

Midday Peak Hour

0 0

10

1 2 0

0

0

1

1

2

0

1

0

1

0

3

5 0 0

PM Peak Hour

0

5

0

0

106

4 1

1

3

00 1

4 0 0 5

03

11

2

4 0 0 4 8

798

1321

1 2

0

1920

76

5

4 183

6 2 0

7

2

10 0

1331 0 27

290 1 0 0 1 170

0 0 0 30

3224 0

1 6

4

203 16

421

10 5 0 3

5

5 202 190 0 2

0

0

6 211

148

6

2180103

Page 52: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Appendix B – Existing Traffic Conditions: Synchro Outputs

Page 53: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis AM Peak Period1: Westhaven St & Erb St W Existing Conditions

Synchro 9 9/30/2017EXAM.syn Page 1

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 746 12 15 432 33 39Future Volume (Veh/h) 746 12 15 432 33 39Sign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90Hourly flow rate (vph) 829 13 17 480 37 43Pedestrians 1Lane Width (m) 3.5Walking Speed (m/s) 1.1Percent Blockage 0Right turn flare (veh) 1Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (m) 161pX, platoon unblocked 0.99vC, conflicting volume 843 1110 422vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 843 1091 422tC, single (s) 4.1 6.9 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 98 82 93cM capacity (veh/h) 801 201 585

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1Volume Total 553 289 17 240 240 80Volume Left 0 0 17 0 0 37Volume Right 0 13 0 0 0 43cSH 1700 1700 801 1700 1700 435Volume to Capacity 0.33 0.17 0.02 0.14 0.14 0.18Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 5.1Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 9.6 0.0 0.0 18.7Lane LOS A CApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 18.7Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.2Intersection Capacity Utilization 32.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 54: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Queues AM Peak Period2: Erb St W & Erbsville Ct Existing Conditions

Synchro 9 9/30/2017EXAM.syn Page 2

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 80 705 354 146 93Future Volume (vph) 80 705 354 146 93Lane Group Flow (vph) 89 783 434 162 103Turn Type Perm NA NA Prot PermProtected Phases 4 8 6Permitted Phases 4 6Detector Phase 4 4 8 6 6Switch PhaseMinimum Initial (s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0Minimum Split (s) 46.0 46.0 46.0 27.0 27.0Total Split (s) 56.5 56.5 56.5 27.0 27.0Total Split (%) 67.7% 67.7% 67.7% 32.3% 32.3%Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lost Time Adjust (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Total Lost Time (s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Lead/LagLead-Lag Optimize?Recall Mode C-Max C-Max C-Max None Nonev/c Ratio 0.16 0.34 0.21 0.79 0.39Control Delay 7.2 7.3 6.1 60.2 11.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 7.2 7.3 6.1 60.2 11.2Queue Length 50th (m) 4.7 25.2 11.8 25.4 0.0Queue Length 95th (m) 12.5 41.7 21.4 42.0 12.4Internal Link Dist (m) 137.1 255.9 210.4Turn Bay Length (m) 50.0 55.0Base Capacity (vph) 570 2271 2061 359 388Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.34 0.21 0.45 0.27

Intersection SummaryCycle Length: 83.5Actuated Cycle Length: 83.5Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBT, Start of GreenNatural Cycle: 75Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated

Splits and Phases: 2: Erb St W & Erbsville Ct

Page 55: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis AM Peak Period2: Erb St W & Erbsville Ct Existing Conditions

Synchro 9 9/30/2017EXAM.syn Page 3

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 80 705 354 37 146 93Future Volume (vph) 80 705 354 37 146 93Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1775 1900 1775 1775 1775 1750Lane Width 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Total Lost time (s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1640 3438 3109 1668 1427Flt Permitted 0.50 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 862 3438 3109 1668 1427Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90Adj. Flow (vph) 89 783 393 41 162 103RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 0 90Lane Group Flow (vph) 89 783 427 0 162 13Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 12 1 7Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 3% 6% 0% 0% 1%Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 0 4 0 0Turn Type Perm NA NA Prot PermProtected Phases 4 8 6Permitted Phases 4 6Actuated Green, G (s) 58.2 58.2 58.2 13.3 13.3Effective Green, g (s) 55.2 55.2 55.2 10.3 10.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.12 0.12Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 569 2272 2055 205 176v/s Ratio Prot c0.23 0.14 c0.10v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.01v/c Ratio 0.16 0.34 0.21 0.79 0.07Uniform Delay, d1 5.3 6.2 5.6 35.6 32.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.4 0.2 18.4 0.2Delay (s) 5.9 6.6 5.8 54.0 32.5Level of Service A A A D CApproach Delay (s) 6.6 5.8 45.7Approach LOS A A D

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 12.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service BHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.41Actuated Cycle Length (s) 83.5 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.0% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 56: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis PM Peak Period1: Westhaven St & Erb St W Existing Conditions

Synchro 9 9/30/2017EXPM.syn Page 1

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 455 24 39 889 32 17Future Volume (Veh/h) 455 24 39 889 32 17Sign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90Hourly flow rate (vph) 506 27 43 988 36 19PedestriansLane Width (m)Walking Speed (m/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh) 1Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (m) 171pX, platoon unblocked 0.90vC, conflicting volume 533 1100 266vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 533 882 266tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 96 86 97cM capacity (veh/h) 1045 249 738

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1Volume Total 337 196 43 494 494 55Volume Left 0 0 43 0 0 36Volume Right 0 27 0 0 0 19cSH 1700 1700 1045 1700 1700 381Volume to Capacity 0.20 0.12 0.04 0.29 0.29 0.14Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.8Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 8.6 0.0 0.0 17.8Lane LOS A CApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.4 17.8Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.8Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.6% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 57: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Queues PM Peak Period2: Erb St W & Erbsville Ct Existing Conditions

Synchro 9 9/30/2017EXPM.syn Page 2

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT SBL SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 56 469 1035 48 49v/c Ratio 0.15 0.18 0.41 0.42 0.34Control Delay 5.3 3.8 5.0 48.5 18.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 5.3 3.8 5.0 48.5 18.1Queue Length 50th (m) 2.3 10.3 28.3 7.6 0.0Queue Length 95th (m) 6.9 16.9 43.1 17.6 9.9Internal Link Dist (m) 147.1 255.9 210.4Turn Bay Length (m) 50.0 55.0Base Capacity (vph) 370 2650 2523 359 350Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.15 0.18 0.41 0.13 0.14

Intersection Summary

Page 58: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis PM Peak Period2: Erb St W & Erbsville Ct Existing Conditions

Synchro 9 9/30/2017EXPM.syn Page 3

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 50 422 884 48 43 44Future Volume (vph) 50 422 884 48 43 44Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1775 1900 1775 1775 1775 1750Lane Width 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Total Lost time (s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1665 3438 3270 1668 1448Flt Permitted 0.27 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 480 3438 3270 1668 1448Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90Adj. Flow (vph) 56 469 982 53 48 49RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 3 0 0 47Lane Group Flow (vph) 56 469 1032 0 48 2Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 7 3Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 1% 2% 0% 0%Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 0 4 0 0Turn Type Perm NA NA Prot PermProtected Phases 4 8 6Permitted Phases 4 6Actuated Green, G (s) 64.4 64.4 64.4 7.1 7.1Effective Green, g (s) 61.4 61.4 61.4 4.1 4.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.05 0.05Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 352 2528 2404 81 71v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 c0.32 c0.03v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.00v/c Ratio 0.16 0.19 0.43 0.59 0.03Uniform Delay, d1 3.3 3.4 4.3 38.9 37.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 0.2 0.6 11.1 0.2Delay (s) 4.3 3.5 4.8 50.0 38.0Level of Service A A A D DApproach Delay (s) 3.6 4.8 43.9Approach LOS A A D

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 6.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service AHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.44Actuated Cycle Length (s) 83.5 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.2% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 59: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Appendix C – Region of Waterloo Erb Street West AADT Data

Page 60: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

635 Erb Street West2027 AADT Forecast

September 12th, 2017

1. Development/Location

2. Current AADT (2017) 13,600

3. Forecast AADT (2027) 20,900

4. Commercial Vehicle Rates 0.8%2.6%

5. Posted Speed Limit 60 Km/h

6. Day/Night Splits

7. Expiry Date

8. NotesThis forecast is intended for the purpose of carrying out a noise study at 635 Erb Street West only. It represents the AADT volumes along Erb Street West (Ira Needles Boulevard - Westhaven Street) and remains valid up to the date indicated above. The Region of Waterloo should be contacted for an update if there are plans to use this forecast beyond the above validity period.

Region of Waterloo AADT Forecast for Noise Studies

635 Erb Street West

% Medium Trucks% Heavy Trucks

Regional Standard 90/10 Day/Night Split

December 31st, 2018

DOCS # 2399552-v2 Prepared by: Tabot Eneme

Page 61: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

635 Erb Street West2027 AADT Forecast

September 12th, 2017

1. Development/Location

2. Current AADT (2017) 14,500

3. Forecast AADT (2027) 19,400

4. Commercial Vehicle Rates 0.7%3.8%

5. Posted Speed Limit 60 Km/h

6. Day/Night Splits

7. Expiry Date

8. Notes

Region of Waterloo AADT Forecast for Noise Studies

635 Erb Street West

% Medium Trucks% Heavy Trucks

Regional Standard 90/10 Day/Night Split

December 31st, 2018

This forecast is intended for the purpose of carrying out a noise study at 635 Erb Street West only. It represents the AADT volumes along Ira Needles Boulevard (Erb Street West to Westhill Drive) and remains valid up to the date indicated above. The Region of Waterloo should be contacted for an update if there are plans to use this forecast beyond the above validity period.

DOCS # 2399552-v2 Prepared by: Tabot Eneme

Page 62: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Appendix D – 2023 Future Background Traffic Conditions: Synchro Outputs

Page 63: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis AM Peak period1: Westhaven St & Erb St W Future Background 2023

Synchro 9 9/30/2017FBAM.syn Page 1

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 966 12 15 559 33 39Future Volume (Veh/h) 966 12 15 559 33 39Sign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90Hourly flow rate (vph) 1073 13 17 621 37 43Pedestrians 1Lane Width (m) 3.5Walking Speed (m/s) 1.1Percent Blockage 0Right turn flare (veh) 1Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (m) 161pX, platoon unblocked 0.96vC, conflicting volume 1087 1425 544vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1087 1355 544tC, single (s) 4.1 6.9 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 97 72 91cM capacity (veh/h) 649 130 488

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1Volume Total 715 371 17 310 310 80Volume Left 0 0 17 0 0 37Volume Right 0 13 0 0 0 43cSH 1700 1700 649 1700 1700 281Volume to Capacity 0.42 0.22 0.03 0.18 0.18 0.28Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 8.7Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 10.7 0.0 0.0 27.1Lane LOS B DApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 27.1Approach LOS D

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.0% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 64: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Queues AM Peak period2: Erb St W & Erbsville Ct Future Background 2023

Synchro 9 9/30/2017FBAM.syn Page 2

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT SBL SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 89 1028 575 162 103v/c Ratio 0.18 0.45 0.28 0.79 0.39Control Delay 7.6 8.2 6.7 60.2 11.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 7.6 8.2 6.7 60.2 11.2Queue Length 50th (m) 4.8 36.6 17.0 25.4 0.0Queue Length 95th (m) 12.9 59.1 29.4 42.0 12.4Internal Link Dist (m) 137.1 255.9 210.4Turn Bay Length (m) 50.0 55.0Base Capacity (vph) 497 2271 2064 359 388Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 0.45 0.28 0.45 0.27

Intersection Summary

Page 65: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis AM Peak period2: Erb St W & Erbsville Ct Future Background 2023

Synchro 9 9/30/2017FBAM.syn Page 3

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 80 925 481 37 146 93Future Volume (vph) 80 925 481 37 146 93Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1775 1900 1775 1775 1775 1750Lane Width 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Total Lost time (s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1642 3438 3118 1668 1427Flt Permitted 0.44 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 753 3438 3118 1668 1427Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90Adj. Flow (vph) 89 1028 534 41 162 103RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 5 0 0 90Lane Group Flow (vph) 89 1028 570 0 162 13Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 12 1 7Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 3% 6% 0% 0% 1%Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 0 4 0 0Turn Type Perm NA NA Prot PermProtected Phases 4 8 6Permitted Phases 4 6Actuated Green, G (s) 58.2 58.2 58.2 13.3 13.3Effective Green, g (s) 55.2 55.2 55.2 10.3 10.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.12 0.12Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 497 2272 2061 205 176v/s Ratio Prot c0.30 0.18 c0.10v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.01v/c Ratio 0.18 0.45 0.28 0.79 0.07Uniform Delay, d1 5.4 6.8 5.9 35.6 32.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.7 0.3 18.4 0.2Delay (s) 6.2 7.5 6.2 54.0 32.5Level of Service A A A D CApproach Delay (s) 7.4 6.2 45.7Approach LOS A A D

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 12.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service BHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50Actuated Cycle Length (s) 83.5 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.0% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 66: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis PM Peak Period1: Westhaven St & Erb St W Future Background 2023

Synchro 9 9/30/2017FBPM.syn Page 1

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 589 24 39 1151 32 17Future Volume (Veh/h) 589 24 39 1151 32 17Sign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90Hourly flow rate (vph) 654 27 43 1279 36 19PedestriansLane Width (m)Walking Speed (m/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh) 1Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (m) 171pX, platoon unblocked 0.83vC, conflicting volume 681 1393 340vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 681 1061 340tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 95 80 97cM capacity (veh/h) 921 176 661

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1Volume Total 436 245 43 640 640 55Volume Left 0 0 43 0 0 36Volume Right 0 27 0 0 0 19cSH 1700 1700 921 1700 1700 268Volume to Capacity 0.26 0.14 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.20Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 5.7Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 9.1 0.0 0.0 23.8Lane LOS A CApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 23.8Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.8Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.8% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 67: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Queues PM Peak Period2: Erb St W & Erbsville Ct Future Background 2023

Synchro 9 9/30/2017FBPM.syn Page 2

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT SBL SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 56 618 1326 48 49v/c Ratio 0.22 0.23 0.52 0.42 0.34Control Delay 6.9 4.0 6.0 48.5 18.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 6.9 4.0 6.0 48.5 18.1Queue Length 50th (m) 2.4 14.2 41.8 7.6 0.0Queue Length 95th (m) 8.1 22.6 63.4 17.6 9.9Internal Link Dist (m) 147.1 255.9 210.4Turn Bay Length (m) 50.0 55.0Base Capacity (vph) 256 2650 2528 359 350Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.22 0.23 0.52 0.13 0.14

Intersection Summary

Page 68: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis PM Peak Period2: Erb St W & Erbsville Ct Future Background 2023

Synchro 9 9/30/2017FBPM.syn Page 3

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 50 556 1146 48 43 44Future Volume (vph) 50 556 1146 48 43 44Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1775 1900 1775 1775 1775 1750Lane Width 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Total Lost time (s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1666 3438 3277 1668 1448Flt Permitted 0.19 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 333 3438 3277 1668 1448Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90Adj. Flow (vph) 56 618 1273 53 48 49RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 2 0 0 47Lane Group Flow (vph) 56 618 1324 0 48 2Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 7 3Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 1% 2% 0% 0%Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 0 4 0 0Turn Type Perm NA NA Prot PermProtected Phases 4 8 6Permitted Phases 4 6Actuated Green, G (s) 64.4 64.4 64.4 7.1 7.1Effective Green, g (s) 61.4 61.4 61.4 4.1 4.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.05 0.05Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 244 2528 2409 81 71v/s Ratio Prot 0.18 c0.40 c0.03v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.00v/c Ratio 0.23 0.24 0.55 0.59 0.03Uniform Delay, d1 3.5 3.6 4.9 38.9 37.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.2 0.2 0.9 11.1 0.2Delay (s) 5.7 3.8 5.8 50.0 38.0Level of Service A A A D DApproach Delay (s) 4.0 5.8 43.9Approach LOS A A D

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 7.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service AHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55Actuated Cycle Length (s) 83.5 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.2% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 69: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Appendix E – 2023 Future Total Traffic Conditions: Synchro Outputs

Page 70: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis AM Peak period1: Westhaven St & Erb St W Future Total 2023

Synchro 9 9/30/2017FTAM.syn Page 1

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 966 22 19 559 74 57Future Volume (Veh/h) 966 22 19 559 74 57Sign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90Hourly flow rate (vph) 1073 24 21 621 82 63Pedestrians 1Lane Width (m) 3.5Walking Speed (m/s) 1.1Percent Blockage 0Right turn flare (veh) 1Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (m) 161pX, platoon unblocked 0.96vC, conflicting volume 1098 1438 550vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1098 1369 550tC, single (s) 4.1 6.9 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 97 35 87cM capacity (veh/h) 643 126 484

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1Volume Total 715 382 21 310 310 145Volume Left 0 0 21 0 0 82Volume Right 0 24 0 0 0 63cSH 1700 1700 643 1700 1700 198Volume to Capacity 0.42 0.22 0.03 0.18 0.18 0.73Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 36.1Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 10.8 0.0 0.0 60.7Lane LOS B FApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.4 60.7Approach LOS F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 4.8Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.4% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 71: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Queues AM Peak period2: Erb St W & Erbsville Ct Future Total 2023

Synchro 9 9/30/2017FTAM.syn Page 2

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT SBL SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 89 1048 580 162 103v/c Ratio 0.18 0.46 0.28 0.79 0.39Control Delay 7.6 8.3 6.7 60.2 11.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 7.6 8.3 6.7 60.2 11.2Queue Length 50th (m) 4.8 37.5 17.2 25.4 0.0Queue Length 95th (m) 12.9 60.7 29.6 42.0 12.4Internal Link Dist (m) 137.1 255.9 210.4Turn Bay Length (m) 50.0 55.0Base Capacity (vph) 495 2271 2064 359 388Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 0.46 0.28 0.45 0.27

Intersection Summary

Page 72: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis AM Peak period2: Erb St W & Erbsville Ct Future Total 2023

Synchro 9 9/30/2017FTAM.syn Page 3

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 80 943 485 37 146 93Future Volume (vph) 80 943 485 37 146 93Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1775 1900 1775 1775 1775 1750Lane Width 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Total Lost time (s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1642 3438 3118 1668 1427Flt Permitted 0.43 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 749 3438 3118 1668 1427Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90Adj. Flow (vph) 89 1048 539 41 162 103RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 5 0 0 90Lane Group Flow (vph) 89 1048 575 0 162 13Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 12 1 7Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 3% 6% 0% 0% 1%Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 0 4 0 0Turn Type Perm NA NA Prot PermProtected Phases 4 8 6Permitted Phases 4 6Actuated Green, G (s) 58.2 58.2 58.2 13.3 13.3Effective Green, g (s) 55.2 55.2 55.2 10.3 10.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.12 0.12Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 495 2272 2061 205 176v/s Ratio Prot c0.30 0.18 c0.10v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.01v/c Ratio 0.18 0.46 0.28 0.79 0.07Uniform Delay, d1 5.4 6.9 5.9 35.6 32.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.7 0.3 18.4 0.2Delay (s) 6.2 7.6 6.2 54.0 32.5Level of Service A A A D CApproach Delay (s) 7.5 6.2 45.7Approach LOS A A D

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 12.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service BHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.51Actuated Cycle Length (s) 83.5 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.0% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 73: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis PM Peak Period1: Westhaven St & Erb St W Future Total 2023

Synchro 9 9/30/2017FTPM.syn Page 1

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 589 55 69 1151 49 32Future Volume (Veh/h) 589 55 69 1151 49 32Sign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90Hourly flow rate (vph) 654 61 77 1279 54 36PedestriansLane Width (m)Walking Speed (m/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh) 1Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (m) 171pX, platoon unblocked 0.82vC, conflicting volume 715 1478 358vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 715 1153 358tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 91 63 94cM capacity (veh/h) 895 146 645

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1Volume Total 436 279 77 640 640 90Volume Left 0 0 77 0 0 54Volume Right 0 61 0 0 0 36cSH 1700 1700 895 1700 1700 227Volume to Capacity 0.26 0.16 0.09 0.38 0.38 0.40Queue Length 95th (m) 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 13.5Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 9.4 0.0 0.0 30.9Lane LOS A DApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.5 30.9Approach LOS D

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.6Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.8% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 74: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Queues PM Peak Period2: Erb St W & Erbsville Ct Future Total 2023

Synchro 9 9/30/2017FTPM.syn Page 2

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT SBL SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 56 634 1360 48 49v/c Ratio 0.23 0.24 0.54 0.42 0.34Control Delay 7.2 4.0 6.1 48.5 18.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 7.2 4.0 6.1 48.5 18.6Queue Length 50th (m) 2.4 14.7 43.6 7.6 0.2Queue Length 95th (m) 8.3 23.3 66.3 17.6 10.0Internal Link Dist (m) 147.1 255.9 210.4Turn Bay Length (m) 50.0 55.0Base Capacity (vph) 246 2650 2528 359 349Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.23 0.24 0.54 0.13 0.14

Intersection Summary

Page 75: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis PM Peak Period2: Erb St W & Erbsville Ct Future Total 2023

Synchro 9 9/30/2017FTPM.syn Page 3

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 50 571 1176 48 43 44Future Volume (vph) 50 571 1176 48 43 44Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1775 1900 1775 1775 1775 1750Lane Width 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Total Lost time (s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1666 3438 3278 1668 1448Flt Permitted 0.18 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 318 3438 3278 1668 1448Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90Adj. Flow (vph) 56 634 1307 53 48 49RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 2 0 0 46Lane Group Flow (vph) 56 634 1358 0 48 3Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 7 3Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 1% 2% 0% 0%Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 0 4 0 0Turn Type Perm NA NA Prot PermProtected Phases 4 8 6Permitted Phases 4 6Actuated Green, G (s) 64.4 64.4 64.4 7.1 7.1Effective Green, g (s) 61.4 61.4 61.4 4.1 4.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.05 0.05Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 233 2528 2410 81 71v/s Ratio Prot 0.18 c0.41 c0.03v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 0.00v/c Ratio 0.24 0.25 0.56 0.59 0.05Uniform Delay, d1 3.6 3.6 5.0 38.9 37.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.4 0.2 1.0 11.1 0.3Delay (s) 6.0 3.8 6.0 50.0 38.1Level of Service A A A D DApproach Delay (s) 4.0 6.0 44.0Approach LOS A A D

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 7.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service AHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.56Actuated Cycle Length (s) 83.5 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.2% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 76: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams

Page 77: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34
Page 78: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34
Page 79: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Appendix G – Signal Warrant for Erb Street West / Westhaven Street Intersection

Page 80: Traffic Impact Study for Residential Development - waterloo.ca · Appendix F – Queuing Analysis Diagrams ... Site Traffic Volume Assignment ... EBL A 5.9 0.16 13 50 EBT A 6.6 0.34

Traffic Signal Justification for Future DevelopmentOTM Book 12 (November, 2007) Section 4.10 - Table 19 - Justification 7 - Projected Volumes

Justification 1: 120% met? (Existing Intersection) [Y/N] NJustification 2: 120% met? (Existing Intersection) [Y/N] N

Restr flow = urban conditions, < 70km/hr posted speedFree Flow = rural case, 70km/hr or greater posted speed

Free Flow Restr. Flow Free Flow Restr. Flow Numerical %

480 720 600 900 911 152%

120 170 120 170 53 44%

480 720 600 900 858 143%

50 75 120 170 31 26%

Average Hourly Volume Formula:AHV = (AmPHV+PmPHV)/4

Where:AHV = Average Hourly Volume AM Peak HourAmPHV = AM Peak Hourly Volume WBT 559PmPHV = PM Peak Hourly Volume Erb St W WBL 19

966 EBT NBL NBR

22 EBR 74 57

PM Peak Hour WesthavenWBT 1151

Erb St W WBL 69

589 EBT NBL NBR

55 EBR 49 32

Warranted only if Justification 1 & 2 are fullfilled to % criteria.

A. Vehicle volume, major street (avg hour)

B. Combined vehicle and pedestrian volume crossing artery from minor streets (avg hour)

98%

84%

Entire %2 or more lanes

Minimum RequirementMinimum RequirementSectional

ComplianceDescription

1. Minimum Vehicular Volume

Justification

2. Delay to cross traffic

1 Lane Highways

Westhaven St

Westhaven St

Scenario 2: 2023 Horizon Year

A. Vehichle volume, all approaches (avg hour)B. Vehicle volume, along minor streets (avg hour)


Recommended