+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Trans Sys Chap04

Trans Sys Chap04

Date post: 30-May-2018
Category:
Upload: dr-ir-r-didin-kusdian-mt
View: 221 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 27

Transcript
  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    1/27

    Introduction toTransportation

    Systems

    1

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    2/27

    PART I:CONTEXT,

    CONCEPTS ANDCHARACTERIZATION

    2

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    3/27

    Chapter 4: The Customer andLevel-of-Service

    3

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    4/27

    The Customer u The customers of the transportation

    system, be it the air passenger or the

    coal executive who is deciding which

    railroad to use to service his

    transportation needs, is fundamentalto the transportation enterprise.

    u Thinking about what is important tothe customer, from the perspective ofwhat services transportation

    organizations provide, is fundamental.

    4

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    5/27

    The Customer u Hamel and Prahalad, in Competing

    for the Future, define the market

    opportunity as fundamental to the

    transportation enterprise.u Drucker talks about allresults being

    externalto the organization, and the

    purpose of the business being thecreation of customers.

    5

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    6/27

    Two Kinds of TransportationCustomers

    u Freight Transportation Customersu Traveler Transportation Customers

    6

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    7/27

    Supply Chain ManagementThe transportation provider -- the

    railroad, for example -- becomes an

    integral part of the customers

    logistics system, providing reliable

    delivery and pick-up of goods asthey progress through the supply

    chain.

    7

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    8/27

    Different Kinds of FreightRequiring DifferentLevels-of-Service

    u High-value manufactured goods......

    u Bulk commodities (e.g., coal, agriculturalproducts)

    8

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    9/27

    Level-of-Service Variablesfor Freight

    FPRICEFTRAVEL TIMEFSERVICE RELIABILITYFAVAILABILITY OF SPECIALIZED

    EQUIPMENTFPROBABILITY OF LOSS AND

    DAMAGE

    9

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    10/27

    Modes, Services andCustomers

    Different Customers

    Different ServicesRequired by

    a Single Customer

    Different Modes/CarriersProviding DifferentLevels-of-Service

    Figure 4.210

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    11/27

    U.S. Freight Transportationin 1993MODE % of

    TON-MILESRAILROAD 34.8

    TRUCK 24.5

    WATER 21.9

    PIPELINE 18.5

    AIR 0.3

    But this may differ substantially from

    country to country.

    11

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    12/27

    Traveler TransportationCustomers

    u Urban traveler transportationu Intercity traveler transportationu International transportation

    12

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    13/27

    Trip Purposesu Schoolu Jobu Social Activitiesu Medical needs

    .

    .

    .

    13

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    14/27

    ModesuAutomobile/Highwayu Bus/Highwayu RailroadsuAiru Ships/Ferries

    14

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    15/27

    Level-of-Service Variablesfor Travelers

    u Priceu Travel Timeu Service Frequencyu Comfortu Reliability

    15

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    16/27

    Customer Choice Customers (freight or traveler)

    have choices of modes.

    They make these choices based

    on the level-of-service provided bycompetitors.

    16

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    17/27

    Level-of-service (LOS) is a

    complex, multidimensionalconcept. The transportation

    provider needs to understand LOS,

    as his/her customer perceives it.

    17

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    18/27

    Level-of-Service asDynamic

    The level-of-service provided bythe carrier will change as a

    function of the volume being

    carried by that carrier.

    18

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    19/27

    But, do customers drive service

    decisions? We would hope so, but

    not always.

    An old joke: We would be better

    able to keep our buses on

    schedule if we didnt have to stopfor passengers.

    19

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    20/27

    u Federal Express determined thatpeople put a high value oninformation about their shipment.

    u People want to buy the reliability andthe travel time, but they also want to

    buy information.u Knowing when their parcel is going to

    get there and knowing if it has goneastray is valuable information to thecustomer. (Its also valuable toFederal Express!)

    20

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    21/27

    Reducing Multi-DimensionalLevel-of-Service to aUni-Dimensional Variable

    variables unitsTRAVEL TIME tt MINUTES

    ACCESS TIME t MINUTESaWAITING TIME t MINUTESwFARE F $

    COMFORT H HUGS

    21

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    22/27

    UtilityLets define a variable V, which is

    the utility of a traveler choice inutils:

    V= a0 + a1tt + a2t + a3t + a4F + a5Ha wNow, if high utility is superior, what

    is the sign ofa1, a2, a3, a4 and a5? Iseach one positive or negative?

    22

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    23/27

    Mode Choice

    Suppose we have three possible modes of travel

    from Boston to New York -- air, train, auto -- and

    you could measure each of the level-of-service

    variables for each mode. We could compute the

    utility of each mode,

    Vair, V

    train, V

    autoand you could assume that the mode with the

    highest utility is the one you would choose.

    23

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    24/27

    Mode Choice

    However, much modern literature in utility theory uses a

    probabilistic approach. For example, the probability a traveler

    selects the air mode is as follows:

    VairP(air) =Vair+ Vtrain+ Vauto

    or perhaps:

    Vair

    eP(air) =

    eVair+ eVtrain + eVauto

    Mode Choice

    This probabilistic approach is intended to reflect the fact that:

    1) people have different utilities, and 2) perhaps we have notcaptured all the level-of-service variables in our formulation.

    If we know the overall size of the market, we can approximate

    the mode volumes by multiplying market size by the probability

    a particular mode is selected.24

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    25/27

    variability

    time

    Average time =

    Figure 4.6

    (time)

    Charlestown Route

    time

    Average time =

    25Figure 4.7

    Travel Time Reliability

    This depends on the in travel time

    between origin and destination.

    Tunnel Route

    30 minutes

    (time)

    40 minutes

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    26/27

    u Now, comparing these two distributions, theaverage travel time going through the

    tunnel is lower than the average travel time

    avoiding the tunnel. If we were making thedecision based on average travel time, we

    would pick the tunnel route.

    u But if we had a plane to catch we mightsay, If I am virtually assured of getting tothat plane by taking the higher average but

    lower variation route, that is what Im going

    to do.

    u So, I chose the more reliable -- lowervariation route -- higher average travel time

    route, because it virtually assures me

    making my air connection.26

  • 8/9/2019 Trans Sys Chap04

    27/27

    Reliability

    We will call variability in travel time

    servicereliability. In particular systems,service reliability in travel time can be as

    important as average travel time.

    Railroad and truck systems for moving

    freight differ both on a reliabilitydimension and on an average travel time

    dimension.

    27


Recommended