+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Transport of amino acids from milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action of...

Transport of amino acids from milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action of...

Date post: 30-Dec-2016
Category:
Upload: rubens
View: 218 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
9
Transport of amino acids from milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action of gastrointestinal enzymes Antonio J. Goulart a, , Juliana C. Bassan a , Ozeni A. Barbosa a , Daniela P. Marques a , Carolina B. Silveira a , Andréa F. Santos c , Saulo S. Garrido c , Flávia A. Resende b , Jonas Contiero d , Rubens Monti a, a Departamento de Alimentos e Nutrição, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, 4 Rod. Araraquara-Jaú, Km 1, CEP 14801-902 Araraquara, SP, Brazil b Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Rod. Araraquara-Jaú, Km 1, CEP 14801-902 Araraquara, SP, Brazil c Departamento de Bioquímica e Química Tecnológica, Instituto de Química, UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Rua Prof. Francisco Degni, 55, CEP 14800-900 Araraquara, SP, Brazil d Departamento de Bioquímica e Microbiologia, Instituto de Biociências, UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Avenida 24-A, CEP 13506-900 Rio Claro, SP, Brazil abstract article info Article history: Received 21 June 2013 Received in revised form 9 December 2013 Accepted 13 January 2014 Available online xxxx Keywords: Amino acid bioavailability Caco-2 cell culture Hydrolysate production Whey protein hydrolysis The bioavailability of amino acids from milk whey protein hydrolysates was evaluated using diffusion of the sub- stances through semi-permeable membranes (dialyzability) and transport by Caco-2 cell cultures. The hydroly- sates with low degree of hydrolysis (LDH) and high degree of hydrolysis (HDH) were obtained after 120 min of reaction time at 50 °C after the initial addition of pepsin, followed by the addition of trypsin, chymotrypsin and carboxypeptidase-A. The proteins and hydrolysates were further subjected to in vitro digestion with pepsin plus pancreatin. HPLC was used to determine the concentrations of dialyzable amino acids (48.4% of the non- hydrolyzed proteins, 63.2% of the LDH sample and 58.3% of the HDH sample), demonstrating the greater dialyzability of the hydrolysates. The LDH and HDH whey protein hydrolysates prepared with pepsin, trypsin, chymotrypsin and carboxypeptidase-A showed only 14.7% and 20.8% of dialyzable small peptides and amino acids, respectively. The efciency of absorption was demonstrated by the preferential transport of Ile, Leu and Arg through a layer of cells. In the LDH hydrolysate, Tyr was also transported. Prior high- and low-degree hydro- lysis of the whey provided transport by 5.7% and 6.6%, respectively, in comparison with 2.3% for non-hydrolyzed proteins, considering the total amount of these amino acids that was applied to the cells. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Bovine cheese whey, a greenish-yellow aqueous phase that appears after the separation of casein coagulated by the action of the enzyme rennin, is a dairy byproduct of cheese and casein manufacturing (Smithers, 2008). The world production of whey increases in proportion to the growth of the dairy industry, approximately 42% per year on av- erage (Thivend, 1978). The whey contains approximately 50% of total milk solids, and 20% of the total milk solids consist of protein (Smithers, 2008). β-Lactoglobulin and α-lactalbumin are among the most abundant proteins; they have outstanding nutritional value (high content of essential amino acids) and are important providers of bioactive peptides (Clare & Swaisgood, 2000; Pihlanto-Leppälä, Rokka, & Korhonen, 1998; Shah, 2000). Of all protein sources, bovine cheese whey protein contains the highest concentration of the branched- chain amino acids L-leucine, L-valine and L-isoleucine (Walzem, 2004). Whey protein hydrolysis has been proposed as a process to recover the highly nutritive content of this waste material (Custódio et al., 2005; Galvão, Silva, Custódio, Monti, & Giordano, 2001; Guadix, Guadix, Páez-Dueñas, González-Tello, & Camacho, 2000; Monti & Jost, 1978). There are historical references to the use of whey for medicinal purposes, such as the treatment of sepsis, wound healing and stomach diseases and to the existence of prosperous whey housesin Europe in the 17th and 18th centuries. Many nutritional and therapeutic prop- erties of whey have been reported (Smithers, 2008). The main methods for the analysis of protein hydrolysates have been described by Silvestre (1997), and the biological properties of whey proteins and peptides have been described by Madureira, Pereira, Gomes, Pintado, and Malcata (2007), and Madureira, Tavares, Gomes, Pintado, and Malcata (2010). Sinha, Radha, Prakash, and Purnima (2007) described the functional properties and nutritional quality of whey hydrolysates, which exhibit greater in vitro digestibility than un- hydrolyzed whey. The in vitro assessment of bioavailability involves mimicking gastrointestinal digestion with commercially available en- zymes, followed by the diffusion of the substances through a semi- permeable membrane to represent their dialyzability (after a period of equilibrium) (Chiplonkar, Agte, Tarwadi, & Kavadia, 1999; Luten et al., 1996; Miller, Schricker, Rasmussen, & Van Campen, 1981). In recent years, the absorption and bioavailability of dietary supplements and drugs have also been evaluated with Caco-2 cell cultures (Pinto, Robine-Leon, Appay, & Kedinger, 1983; Herold, Besemer, & Rogler, 1994; Au & Reddy, 2000; Rubio & Seiquer, 2002; Chang-Shu, Glahn, & Food Research International xxx (2014) xxxxxx Corresponding authors. Tel.: +55 16 3301 6934; fax: +55 16 3301 6920. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (A.J. Goulart), [email protected] (R. Monti). FRIN-05035; No of Pages 9 0963-9969/$ see front matter © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.01.037 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Food Research International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foodres Please cite this article as: Goulart, A.J., et al., Transport of amino acids from milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action of gastrointestinal enzymes, Food Research International (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.01.037
Transcript
Page 1: Transport of amino acids from milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action of gastrointestinal enzymes

Food Research International xxx (2014) xxx–xxx

FRIN-05035; No of Pages 9

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Food Research International

j ourna l homepage: www.e lsev ie r .com/ locate / foodres

Transport of amino acids frommilk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer afterhydrolytic action of gastrointestinal enzymes

Antonio J. Goulart a,⁎, Juliana C. Bassan a, Ozeni A. Barbosa a, Daniela P. Marques a, Carolina B. Silveira a,Andréa F. Santos c, Saulo S. Garrido c, Flávia A. Resende b, Jonas Contiero d, Rubens Monti a,⁎a Departamento de Alimentos e Nutrição, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, 4 Rod. Araraquara-Jaú, Km 1, CEP 14801-902 Araraquara, SP, Brazilb Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Rod. Araraquara-Jaú, Km 1, CEP 14801-902 Araraquara, SP, Brazilc Departamento de Bioquímica e Química Tecnológica, Instituto de Química, UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Rua Prof. Francisco Degni, 55, CEP 14800-900 Araraquara, SP, Brazild Departamento de Bioquímica e Microbiologia, Instituto de Biociências, UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Avenida 24-A, CEP 13506-900 Rio Claro, SP, Brazil

⁎ Corresponding authors. Tel.: +55 16 3301 6934; fax:E-mail addresses: [email protected] (A.J. Goula

(R. Monti).

0963-9969/$ – see front matter © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.01.037

Please cite this article as: Goulart, A.J., et agastrointestinal enzymes, Food Research Inte

a b s t r a c t

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history:Received 21 June 2013Received in revised form 9 December 2013Accepted 13 January 2014Available online xxxx

Keywords:Amino acid bioavailabilityCaco-2 cell cultureHydrolysate productionWhey protein hydrolysis

The bioavailability of amino acids frommilkwhey protein hydrolysates was evaluated using diffusion of the sub-stances through semi-permeable membranes (dialyzability) and transport by Caco-2 cell cultures. The hydroly-sates with low degree of hydrolysis (LDH) and high degree of hydrolysis (HDH) were obtained after 120 min ofreaction time at 50 °C after the initial addition of pepsin, followed by the addition of trypsin, chymotrypsin andcarboxypeptidase-A. The proteins and hydrolysates were further subjected to in vitro digestion with pepsinplus pancreatin. HPLC was used to determine the concentrations of dialyzable amino acids (48.4% of the non-hydrolyzed proteins, 63.2% of the LDH sample and 58.3% of the HDH sample), demonstrating the greaterdialyzability of the hydrolysates. The LDH and HDH whey protein hydrolysates prepared with pepsin, trypsin,chymotrypsin and carboxypeptidase-A showed only 14.7% and 20.8% of dialyzable small peptides and aminoacids, respectively. The efficiency of absorption was demonstrated by the preferential transport of Ile, Leu andArg through a layer of cells. In the LDH hydrolysate, Tyr was also transported. Prior high- and low-degree hydro-lysis of the whey provided transport by 5.7% and 6.6%, respectively, in comparison with 2.3% for non-hydrolyzedproteins, considering the total amount of these amino acids that was applied to the cells.

© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction

Bovine cheese whey, a greenish-yellow aqueous phase that appearsafter the separation of casein coagulated by the action of the enzymerennin, is a dairy byproduct of cheese and casein manufacturing(Smithers, 2008). Theworld production ofwhey increases in proportionto the growth of the dairy industry, approximately 42% per year on av-erage (Thivend, 1978). The whey contains approximately 50% of totalmilk solids, and 20% of the total milk solids consist of protein(Smithers, 2008). β-Lactoglobulin and α-lactalbumin are among themost abundant proteins; they have outstanding nutritional value(high content of essential amino acids) and are important providers ofbioactive peptides (Clare & Swaisgood, 2000; Pihlanto-Leppälä, Rokka,& Korhonen, 1998; Shah, 2000). Of all protein sources, bovine cheesewhey protein contains the highest concentration of the branched-chain amino acids L-leucine, L-valine and L-isoleucine (Walzem, 2004).Whey protein hydrolysis has been proposed as a process to recoverthe highly nutritive content of this waste material (Custódio et al.,2005; Galvão, Silva, Custódio, Monti, & Giordano, 2001; Guadix,

+55 16 3301 6920.rt), [email protected]

ghts reserved.

l., Transport of amino acids frnational (2014), http://dx.do

Guadix, Páez-Dueñas, González-Tello, & Camacho, 2000; Monti & Jost,1978). There are historical references to the use of whey for medicinalpurposes, such as the treatment of sepsis, wound healing and stomachdiseases and to the existence of prosperous “whey houses” in Europein the 17th and 18th centuries. Many nutritional and therapeutic prop-erties of whey have been reported (Smithers, 2008).

Themainmethods for the analysis of protein hydrolysates have beendescribed by Silvestre (1997), and the biological properties of wheyproteins and peptides have been described by Madureira, Pereira,Gomes, Pintado, and Malcata (2007), and Madureira, Tavares, Gomes,Pintado, and Malcata (2010). Sinha, Radha, Prakash, and Purnima(2007) described the functional properties and nutritional quality ofwhey hydrolysates, which exhibit greater in vitro digestibility than un-hydrolyzed whey. The in vitro assessment of bioavailability involvesmimicking gastrointestinal digestion with commercially available en-zymes, followed by the diffusion of the substances through a semi-permeable membrane to represent their dialyzability (after a period ofequilibrium) (Chiplonkar, Agte, Tarwadi, & Kavadia, 1999; Luten et al.,1996; Miller, Schricker, Rasmussen, & Van Campen, 1981). In recentyears, the absorption and bioavailability of dietary supplements anddrugs have also been evaluated with Caco-2 cell cultures (Pinto,Robine-Leon, Appay, & Kedinger, 1983; Herold, Besemer, & Rogler,1994; Au & Reddy, 2000; Rubio & Seiquer, 2002; Chang-Shu, Glahn, &

rom milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action ofi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.01.037

Page 2: Transport of amino acids from milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action of gastrointestinal enzymes

2 A.J. Goulart et al. / Food Research International xxx (2014) xxx–xxx

Rui Hai, 2004; Perales, Barberá, Lagarda, & Farré, 2005; Argyri et al.,2009; Kotake-Nara, Yonekura, & Nagao, 2010). Caco-2 cells, derivedfrom a human colorectal adenocarcinoma, have been extensively usedfor over 30 years as a model for the study of absorption, metabolismand toxicity; they can differentiate into monolayers with a phenotypewith many functions of the small intestinal villus epithelium, withmany of the brush border enzymes and transport proteins mediatingthe active transport or efflux of molecules (Artursson, Palm, &Luthman, 2012; Ferruzza, Rossi, Scarino, & Sambuy, 2012; Hubatsch,Ragnarsson, & Artursson, 2007).

The present study differs from previous investigations because thewhey proteins used were obtained from fresh whey. This involvesavoiding protein denaturation or the variability due to differentmethods of concentration, heating or procedures for isolation and frac-tionation (Schmidt, Packard, &Morris, 1984), seeking thereby to use theprotein in itsmore native formas possible and give a destination ecolog-ically correct to the whey, producing high value-added materials.

The aims of the present studywere to determine the best treatmentsfor the low-degree and high-degree hydrolysis of whey proteins withcommercially available proteolytic enzymes and the bioavailability ofthe released amino acids inwhey hydrolysates by two in vitromethods,dialyzability and transport by Caco-2 cells.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Bovine cheesewhey production and analysis of pH, reducing sugars andprotein content

Cheese whey was prepared by adding 0.6% (v/v) animal rennin and0.3% CaCl2 solution (0.5mol L−1) to bovinemilk and incubating at 37 °Cfor one hour. The insoluble portion (caseins) wasfiltered offwith gauze,and the whey filtrate was dialyzed for 12 h against distilled water, andthen filtered through kaolin (20 g L−1). The pH was read on a MettlerToledo FiveEasy pH meter. Protein concentration (Hartree, 1972) andreducing sugars (Miller, 1959) were analyzed with an Ultrospec 3100Pro spectrophotometer (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, USA).

2.2. Hydrolytic enzymes

Stock solutions of 0.5 mg.mL−1 of pepsin (1290 units mg−1 pro-tein), chymotrypsin (55 units mg−1 protein) and trypsin (1300 BAEEunits mg−1 solid) were prepared. Carboxypeptidase-A (50 units mg−1

protein) was prepared at a concentration of 0.025 μL mL−1. All enzymeswere purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and dissolvedin deionized water.

2.3. Cheese whey hydrolysis

The whey was subjected to five hydrolysis treatments. For treat-ments 1 and 2, the whey was adjusted with 1% (w/v) ascorbic acid toa final pH of 3.0. The temperature was 37 °C in treatment 1 and 50 °Cin treatment 2. At the start of hydrolysis, 0.666mL stock pepsin solutionwas added to 10 mL of whey. After 20 min, the pH was adjusted to 9.5with 0.1 mol L−1 sodium hydroxide and the enzymes trypsin, chymo-trypsin and carboxypeptidase A were then added in sequence in thesame volumetric ratio as the pepsin (0.666mL). The hydrolysis reactioncontinued for an additional 120 min.

In treatment 3, the whey was adjusted to pH 3.0, as above, and thehydrolysis temperature was set to 50 °C. When this temperature wasreached, the pepsin was added, starting the reaction. After 20 min, thesuspension (whey + pepsin) was heated for 2 min at 100 °C to inacti-vate the pepsin, then cooled to 37 °C and buffered to pH 9.5. Theenzymes trypsin, chymotrypsin and carboxypeptidase (0.666 mLeach)were then added in sequence as described for treatments 1 and 2.

Treatments 4 and 5 followed the same temperature pattern astreatments 1 and 2, respectively, and hydrolysis with pepsin occurred

Please cite this article as: Goulart, A.J., et al., Transport of amino acids fgastrointestinal enzymes, Food Research International (2014), http://dx.do

during the first 20 min of the reaction. After buffering to pH 9.5, theother enzymes were added as follows: trypsin at 20 min of reaction,chymotrypsin at 30 min of reaction and carboxypeptidase at 40 min ofreaction. Hydrolysis was stopped after the reaction had proceeded fora total of 120 min.

2.4. Characterization of hydrolysates

The McDonald and Chen (1965) method was used to estimate thetotal amount of the reaction product released by the enzymes. Thismethod permits the determination of peptide bonds and tyrosine andtryptophan in the reaction medium. Aliquots were taken at 10, 20, 40,60, 90 and 120 min and analyzed. The absorbance was read at700 nm. The calibration curve was generated using tyrosine (Sigma)as the standard. The absorptivity was taken as 0.511 (μmol mL−1) cm−1.

2.5. HPLC analysis of whey hydrolysis products

For all treatments, samples were taken after 120 min of reaction,boiled for 3 min to inactivate the enzymes and frozen for subsequentanalysis by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Aliquotsof 20 μL were injected into a Varian ProStar or Shimadzu LC 10Aemploying a Nucleosil C18 reversed-phase column (25 × 0.46 in.;5 μm particle size; 300 Å pore size) with a 5 to 95% linear gradient ofsolvent B (A: water, 0.045% trifluoracetic acid (TFA); B: acetonitrile(ACN), 0.036% TFA) as the mobile phase, flowing 1.0 mL min−1 for30 min. UV detection was performed at 220 nm.

Amino acid analyses were performed by post-columnfunctionalization with o-phthalaldehyde (OPA) in automatic ana-lyzer Shimadzu model LC-10A/C-47A with fluorescence detector,equipped with ion-exchange column Shimadzu model Shim-packfor amino acid analysis. The flow rate used was 0.6 mL min−1 andthe mobile phase consisted of:

- Mobile phase A: sodium citrate 19.6 g, 99.5% ethanol 140 mL, 60%perchloric acid 16.7 mL, final volume 1 L, pH 3.1;

- Mobile phase B: sodium citrate 58.8 g, boric acid 12.4 g, 4.0 M sodi-um hydroxide solution 30 mL; final volume 1 L, pH 10.0;

- Mobile phase C: 0.2 M sodium hydroxide solution, pH 13.5.

The system was calibrated with a standard mixture of amino acids,yielding a value for the elution time of each amino acid and the conver-sion factor between the area of each peak and the sample concentration.

2.6. Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)

At various time intervals (10, 20, 40, 60, 90 and 120 min),aliquots of 200 μL were removed from the enzymatic assay, and anequal volume of sample preparation buffer (Tris-glycine, glycerol,SDS, β-mercaptoethanol and bromophenol blue)was added and samplesheated for 3 min at 100 °C, then stored at 4 °C until electrophoresis. SDS-PAGE (12%) was performed by Laemlli (1970) method. Aliquots of 25 μLwere loaded on the gel in sample wells, one of which carried 10 μL of astandard molecular weight ladder (GE Healthcare) consisting of phos-phorylase b (97 kDa), bovine serum albumin (66 kDa), ovalbumin(45 kDa), carbonic anhydrase (30 kDa), trypsin inhibitor (20.1 kDa)and α-lactalbumin (14.4 kDa). The gel plate was run for 2 h at 40 mA,and then stained with silver (Blum, Beier, & Gross, 1987) and colloidalBrilliant Blue G (Neuhoff, Stamm, & Eibl, 1988).

2.7. In vitro gastrointestinal digestion of whey proteins and hydrolysates

The in vitro digestion method was previously described by Milleret al. (1981) and modified by Luten et al. (1996). Prior to digestion,0.48 g of commercial pepsin (Sigma) of specific activity 1290 U mgprot−1 was dissolved in 3 mL of 0.1 mol.L−1 HCl. The pH of 95 mLsamples of whole whey proteins and their various hydrolysates was

rom milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action ofi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.01.037

Page 3: Transport of amino acids from milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action of gastrointestinal enzymes

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Treatment 1

Treatment 2

Treatment 3

Treatment 4

Treatment 5

and

try

pto

ph

anU

nit

s o

f p

epti

des

an

d/o

r ty

rosi

ne

Fig. 1. Total units of amino acids released after bovinewhey protein hydrolysis by five dif-ferent enzymatic hydrolysis treatments. Treatments conditions are described in Materialsand methods. Values are the mean ± standard deviation of three experiments.

3A.J. Goulart et al. / Food Research International xxx (2014) xxx–xxx

adjusted to 2.0 by adding 6.0 mol.L−1 HCl. After pH stabilization, 3mLofthe pepsin solution was added, and the volumewas adjusted to 100mLwith Milli-Q water. The suspension was incubated in a shaking waterbath at 37 °C for 2 h. Following enzymatic digestion, 20 mL aliquots ofthe digestswere adjusted to pH7.5with 0.5mol L−1 NaHCO3. Segmentsof pretreatedmembrane tubes containing 25mL of 0.5mol L−1 NaHCO3

solution were carefully immersed in beakers containing the enzymaticdigest, followed by the addition of 5.0 g of a pancreatin-bile extractcontaining 20 mg of pancreatin and 125 mg of bile extract (Sigma) in5mL of 0.5mol L−1 NaHCO3 solution. The suspensionwas then incubat-ed in a shakingwater bath at 37 °C for 2 h to complete the digestion andfacilitate the diffusion of small peptides and amino acids. The solutionoutside, the external digest (Dext), and the solution inside the mem-brane, the internal digest (Dint) were stored separately at −18 °C forsubsequent experiments.

2.8. Caco-2 cell culture

Caco-2 cells were kindly provided by Dr. Rosário Dominguez CrespoHirata of the Department of Clinical Analyses and Toxicology at theSchool of Pharmaceutical Science, University of São Paulo, Brazil. Thecells were maintained in DMEM minimal essential medium (Sigma)with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (South American cod. 12657029),1% (v/v) non-essential amino acids (MEN non-essential amino acids,Sigma, lot RNBB 3743), 1% (v/v) glutamine (L-glutamine solutionBioxtra, 200 mmol L−1, SO, lot RNBB 2939, Sigma) and 1% (v/v)antibiotic-antimycotic solution 100× (lot BCBB 8363, Sigma), atpH 7.2 to 7.4, and incubated at 37 °C at 5% CO2 and constant humidity.The culturemediumwas replaced every two days. Cells at approximately80% confluence were recovered with a trypsin-EDTA solution (2.5 g L−1

of trypsin and 0.2 g L−1 of EDTA, Sigma) and used for new transfers orseeded in cell culture flasks with a growth area of 25 cm2 or 75 cm2

(Corning Incorporation), at a density of approximately 6000 cells/cm2

for continuous growth or 20,000 cells/insert in the absorptionexperiments.

2.9. Cytotoxicity assay

Cell viability was measured by the sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay.Cells were added to 96-well plates (6 × 103 cells/well), and the culturewasmaintained at 37 °C under 5% CO2. The cells were allowed to attachfor 24 h, and test compounds [non-hydrolyzed (NH)whey proteins andhydrolysates with a low degree of hydrolysis (LDH) or high degree ofhydrolysis (HDH)] underwent gastrointestinal digestion in the absenceof a membrane. These samples were added to DMEM supplementedwith 10% fetal bovine serum. In the wells of the first row, 10 μL of thetest compounds at an initial concentration 60 μg μL−1 was dispensedand serial dilutions from 600 to 18.8 μg/well, as described by Oliver,Harrison, Bishop, Cole, and Laurent (1989). The assay was terminatedafter 24 h by removing the medium from the well.

For the SRB assay, cells were then washed twice with ice-cold phos-phate buffered saline (PBS), prior to fixation with 10% TCA (100 μL perwell) at 4 °C for 30 min. Each well was washed with tap water five tosix times and dried. SRB (0.4%) dissolved in 1% acetic acid was addedand incubated for 30 min. The wells were washed five to six timeswith 1% acetic acid and dried. Tris base (10 mmol L−1, pH 10.5) wasadded to each dried well. The optical density was measured at 530 nmwith a microplate reader (Molecular Device, Versa Max, USA).

2.10. Bioavailability studies in Caco-2 cells

For each experiment, Caco-2 cells were seeded and grown for 21days in culture platewell inserts to obtain confluent, highly differentiat-ed cell monolayers. At the beginning of each experiment, the cell mono-layers were washed with 0.5 mL PBS and treated with 10 μL of the testcompounds at an initial concentration of 6 μg μL−1 in transport buffer

Please cite this article as: Goulart, A.J., et al., Transport of amino acids fgastrointestinal enzymes, Food Research International (2014), http://dx.do

(Perales et al., 2005) containing 130 mmol L−1 NaCl, 10 mmol L−1 KCl,1 mmol L−1 MgSO4, 5 mmol L−1 glucose and 50 mmol L−1 HEPES,pH 7.0, at 37 °C. After 2 h of incubation at 37 °C in 5% CO2, media fromthe upper and lower chambers were harvested and separately analyzedby HPLC.

3. Results

3.1. Production of whey protein hydrolysates under various conditions ofhydrolysis

Five different treatments were investigated for the production ofhydrolysates from whey proteins. As shown in Fig. 1, treatment 5(50 °C; initial hydrolysis with pepsin for 20 min, followed by thesequential addition of trypsin, chymotrypsin and carboxypeptidase-Aat ten-minute intervals) resulted in the greatest hydrolysis of theproteins after 120 min, as evidenced by a greater quantity of peptidesand/or tyrosine and tryptophan units than that in other treatments(temperature, sequence of enzyme addition, boiling to inactivatepepsin). The improved efficiency of treatment 5 may have been due tothe separate addition of the enzymes, which could lead to enhancedhydrolytic activity, because the enzymes employed show specificity toparticular amino acids sequences in the polypeptide chain. Treatment3 produced the second largest amount of peptides. Therefore, for subse-quent experiments, these two treatments were employed to producehydrolysates that were termed LDH [sample with a lower degree ofhydrolysis (treatment 3)] and HDH [sample with a higher degree ofhydrolysis (treatment 5)].

3.2. HPLC and SDS-PAGE analysis of LDH and HDH

The SDS-PAGE and HPLC analysis of the samples obtained underhydrolysis treatments 3 and 5 confirmed the greater catalytic efficiencyof the latter treatment. Fig. 2 (lanes 2 to 7) shows the SDS-PAGE analysisof LDH, which demonstrates that some proteins were not completelyhydrolyzed and a number of small peptides were observed near thebottom of the gel. Under treatment 5, these small peptides completelydisappeared after 60 min of hydrolysis (Fig. 2, lanes 8 to 13).

The analysis of the HPLC chromatograms confirmed the SDS-PAGEfindings. Due to their structural characteristics, the hydrophobicportions of the proteins are exposed in the polar medium, enhancingits interaction with the reverse phase of the matrix. Under typicalconditions, the proteins are desorbed from the reverse phase of thegel matrix as the polarity of the solvent in the mobile phase is reduced,resulting in longer retention times than for small peptides, which are

rom milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action ofi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.01.037

Page 4: Transport of amino acids from milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action of gastrointestinal enzymes

Fig. 2. SDS-PAGE of whey proteins hydrolyzed under treatment 3 (lanes 2 to 7) and treatment 5 (lanes 8 to 13). Lane 1: molar mass standard (GE Healthcare). Lanes 2 to 7 and 8 to 13:products after reaction for 10, 20, 40, 60, 90 and 120 min.

4 A.J. Goulart et al. / Food Research International xxx (2014) xxx–xxx

generally in a random coil state. The best chromatographic results indi-cated that more efficient enzymatic hydrolysis occurred after 120 minunder treatment 5 than under treatment 3. A greater number of peaksrepresenting adsorbed peptides was observed under treatment 3(LDH) at retention times greater than 20 min, demonstrating thepresence of hydrophobic peptides and a lower degree of hydrolysis(Fig. 3A), whereas no peptide links were observed under treatment 5(HDH) at the retention time, demonstrating greater catalytic efficiency(Fig. 3B).

3.3. Gastrointestinal digestion and dialyzability of proteins and hydrolysates

The dialyzability of proteins and their hydrolysates produced withthe commercial proteinases pepsin, trypsin, chymotrypsin andcarboxypeptidase-A was tested after digestion with pepsin, pancreatinand bile salts. Table 1 displays the analysis of proteins, peptides and ty-rosine and tryptophan after gastrointestinal digestion of the integralwhey proteins and their hydrolysates. A total of 4.41 ± 0.16 g L−1 ofprotein was determined in the external digest of the non-hydrolyzedwhey, whereas this amount was reduced by 52.4% in the LDH and60.5% in the HDH digests, demonstrating that the latter hydrolysis facil-itated the action of gastrointestinal enzymes on the whey proteins. Theresults also revealed a small amount of peptides and/or tyrosine andtryptophan (0.038 total U) in the non-hydrolyzed whey. After gastroin-testinal digestion, however, the amount of peptides and/or tyrosine andtryptophan increased by 894.7% to 0.34 total U, of which 38.2% (0.13total U) was dialyzable, indicating satisfactory diffusion of these reac-tion products, in agreement with findings reported in the literature(Argyri et al., 2009; Bermejo et al., 2002; Romarís-Hortas et al., 2011).The LDHhydrolysate contained 0.384 total U of peptides and/or tyrosineand tryptophan (1010.5% greater), ofwhich 29.7%wasdialyzable (0.114

Fig. 3. HPLC profile of cheese whey hydrolysis products after a 120 min r

Please cite this article as: Goulart, A.J., et al., Transport of amino acids fgastrointestinal enzymes, Food Research International (2014), http://dx.do

total U). The HDH hydrolysate contained 0.542 total U of peptides and/or tyrosine and tryptophan (1426.3% greater), of which 31.7% (0.172 U)was dialyzable.

Fractions of the external and internal predicted gastrointestinaldigests of the non-hydrolyzed whey proteins (DextNH and DintNH,respectively) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (results not shown) andHPLC, which revealed a high degree of hydrolysis based on the presenceof dialyzable peptides and amino acids, demonstrating satisfactoryagreement with the levels determined by the method described byMcDonald and Chen (1965), (Table 1). The results are displayed in theaminograms (Fig. 4), which indicate 16 amino acids in the DextNH and17 in the DintNH. High concentrations of leucine and lysinewere detectedin the DintNH (339.67 and 314.15 nmol L−1, respectively).

The SDS-PAGE analysis of the fractions of the gastrointestinal digestsof the LDH and HDH hydrolysates is shown in Fig. 5. The disappearanceof protein bands in the DintLDH lane indicates protein hydrolysis,whereas the proteins were not completely hydrolyzed in the DextLDH(lane 3). Moreover, a greater reduction in polypeptides was observedin DextHDH (lane 5) than that in DextLDH, and no protein bands wereobserved in the DintHDH (lane 6). Thus, even after prior hydrolysis ofproteins and gastrointestinal digestion, resistant polypeptides (largerthan 12 kDa) remained on the external side of the membrane.

Aliquots were analyzed by reverse phase HPLC to investigate thecomposition and concentration of amino acids in the fractions of theLDH and HDH gastrointestinal digests. Fig. 6 displays the aminogramsresulting from the LDH and HDH fractions recovered inside the mem-brane, demonstrating the presence of 14 amino acids. The comparisonof relative concentration of the dialyzable amino acids after enzymaticdigestion of cheese whey proteins (internal NH digest) and LDHhydrolysates (internal LDH digest) indicated greater dialyzability forAsp, Thr, Glu, Pro, Gly and Arg from internal LDH digest and reduced

eaction. A: condition 3 (sample LDH); B: condition 5 (sample HDH).

rom milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action ofi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.01.037

Page 5: Transport of amino acids from milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action of gastrointestinal enzymes

Table 1Total analysis of the whey proteins, peptides and amino acids before and after in vitro gastrointestinal digestion.

Steps Proteins (g L−1)a Peptides and/or tyrosine and tryptophanb

External gastrointestinal digest (DextNH) 4.41 ± 0.16 0.210 ± 0.012Internal gastrointestinal digest (DintNH) 2.14 ± 0.06 0.130 ± 0.005External gastrointestinal digest (DextLDH) 2.10 ± 0.04 0.270 ± 0.011Internal gastrointestinal digest (DintLDH) 0.68 ± 0.02 0.114 ± 0.055External gastrointestinal digest (DextHDH) 1.74 ± 0.03 0.370 ± 0.004Internal gastrointestinal digest (DintHDH) 0.55 ± 0.01 0.172 ± 0.006

a Protein determined by method of Hartree 26.b Peptides and/or tyrosine and tryptophan determined bymethod of McDonald & Chen 28. DextNH: non-hydrolyzed proteins external digest; DintNH: non-hydrolyzed proteins internal

digest; DextLDH: low degree of hydrolysis external digest; DintLDH: low degree of hydrolysis internal digest; DextHDH: high degree of hydrolysis external digest; DintHDH: high degree ofhydrolysis internal digest.

5A.J. Goulart et al. / Food Research International xxx (2014) xxx–xxx

dialyzability for Ala, Val, Met, Leu, Tyr, Phe, His and Lys (Table 2). Ser,Cys and Ile were not detected in the LDH digest. Comparing the resultsof the internal NH digest and internal HDH digest, greater dialyzabilitywas found for Asp, Thr, Glu, Pro, Gly, Ala, Leu, Tyr, Phe, Lys and Argfrom the HDH digest, and reduced dialyzability for Val, Met and His.As for LDH, Ser, Cys and Ile were not detected in the HDH digest. Thus,for the internal LDH and HDH samples, the dialyzability of the majorityof amino acids (Asp, Thr, Glu, Pro, Gly, Ala, Val, Met, Leu, Phe, His, Lysand Arg) was greater than that with the internal NH sample (Table 2,lane % Internal of each sample), suggesting that gastrointestinal diges-tion enhanced the dialyzability of the amino acids in the hydrolysates:63.2% of the internal LDH and 58.3% of the internal HDH sample weredialyzed, compared to only 48.4% of the internal NH sample. Thesefindings demonstrate the importance and efficiency of the prior

Fig. 4. Cheese whey protein aminograms after gastrointestinal digestion. A:

Please cite this article as: Goulart, A.J., et al., Transport of amino acids fgastrointestinal enzymes, Food Research International (2014), http://dx.do

hydrolysis of whey proteins for the enhanced permeation of smallpeptides and amino acids. The LDH andHDHwhey protein hydrolysatesprepared with pepsin, trypsin, chymotrypsin and carboxipetidade-Aand without subsequent gastrointestinal digestion treatment, showedonly 14.7% and 20.8% of dialyzable small peptides and amino acids,respectively.

3.4. Transport of amino acids through a monolayer of Caco-2 cells

For the absorption and transport studies, 100-μL fractions of samplesNH, LDH and HDH (6.0 μg of supplements per 1.0 μL of transport buffer)were added to the apical side of a monolayer of Caco-2 cells. Afterincubation for 2 h, the material remaining on the apical side and thattransported to the basal side were analyzed by HPLC. Fig. 7 displays

DextNH; B: DintNH. Conditions are described in Materials and methods.

rom milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action ofi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.01.037

Page 6: Transport of amino acids from milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action of gastrointestinal enzymes

Fig. 5. SDS-PAGE of the cheese whey proteins and their hydrolysates before and afterdialyzability. Lanes: 1 —molecular mass standard; 2 — NH (whey proteins); 3 — DextLDH(external gastrointestinal digest); 4 — DintLDH (internal gastrointestinal digest); 5 —

DextHDH (external intestinal digest); 6 — DintHDH (internal intestinal digest).

6 A.J. Goulart et al. / Food Research International xxx (2014) xxx–xxx

the concentrations of the preferentially transported amino acids, dem-onstrating that the previous treatments of the whey protein samplesaffected the types of amino acids produced and transported throughthe monolayer of Caco-2 cells. In all three samples tested, the mainamino acids that permeated the monolayer were Ile, Leu and Arg.Tyrosine was also transported but only in the LDH sample. Consideringthe relative concentrations of amino acids Ile, Leu, Tyr and Argdetermined in the samples (490,0 nM, 307,8 nM and 895,7 nM for

Fig. 6. Aminograms of cheese whey protein hydroly

Please cite this article as: Goulart, A.J., et al., Transport of amino acids fgastrointestinal enzymes, Food Research International (2014), http://dx.do

LDH, HDH e NH, respectively), the cell culture exerted selectivity, andtransported 6.6% of these amino acids from the LDH sample, followedby the HDH sample (5.7%) and finally the NH sample (2.3%) (Fig. 7).Thus, as observed with regard to dialyzability, previous hydrolysis ofwhey proteins also enhanced the transport of amino acids. Moreover,the SRB assays demonstrated that the whey proteins and thehydrolysates produced were not cytotoxic to Caco-2 cells under theconditions employed in the present study.

4. Discussion

Numerous investigations have been conducted in recent decadesand how tomake use of whey, a dairy byproduct composed of multipleproteins (Clare & Swaisgood, 2000; Custódio et al., 2005; Galvão et al.,2001; Ha & Zemel, 2003; Liu, Zhu, & Zhao, 2008; Madureira et al.,2010). Most of these studies have been performed on dry whey proteinconcentrate or whey protein isolates, which are less soluble comparedto the fresh milk whey used in this work. These proteins have a widerange of applications due to their considerable biological value. Biologicalvalue is a measure of the percentage of a given nutrient used by the bodyand is related to the extent with which the body uses the proteinconsumed. The biological value of whey proteins is exceptional andexceeds that of egg proteins by approximately 15%. The present studydiffers from previous investigations because the whey proteins usedwere in a more native state because they were obtained from freshwhey, thereby avoiding extra new processes such as separation or con-centration. After two hydrolysates were produced, with the enzymespepsin, trypsin, chymotrypsin and carboxypeptidase-A, gastrointestinal

sates after dialyzability. A: DintLDH; B: DintHDH.

rom milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action ofi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.01.037

Page 7: Transport of amino acids from milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action of gastrointestinal enzymes

Table2

Relative

conc

entrations

ofthedialyzab

leam

inoacidsde

term

ined

afteren

zymaticdige

stionof

chee

sewhe

yproteins

andhy

drolysates.

Relative

conc

entration(n

mol

L−1 )

NHa

LDHa

HDHa

AA

External

Internal

External

+Internal

%Externa

l%Interna

lEx

ternal

Internal

External

+Internal

%Externa

l%Interna

lEx

ternal

Internal

External

+Internal

%Externa

l%Interna

l

Non

-essen

tials

Asp

39.211

51.511

90.722

43.2

56.8

47.142

78.160

125.30

237

.662

.455

.908

105.71

616

1.62

434

.665

.4Se

r85

.671

61.385

147.05

658

.341

.70

00

0.0

0.0

00

00.0

0.0

Glu

93.789

87.489

181.27

851

.748

.365

.758

115.46

718

1.22

536

.363

.784

.500

203.79

428

8.29

429

.370

.7Pro

06.82

46.82

40.0

100.0

017

.096

17.096

0.0

100.0

017

.567

17.567

0.0

100.0

Gly

60.530

62.841

123.37

149

.150

.949

.337

78.581

127.91

838

.661

.464

.129

126.83

919

0.96

833

.666

.42

Ala

155.06

311

5.60

327

0.66

657

.342

.761

.552

96.296

157.84

839

.061

.010

7.45

415

7.82

326

5.27

740

.559

.49

Cys

31.409

13.729

45.138

69.6

30.4

00

00.0

0.0

00

00.0

0.0

Tyr

71.898

121.37

719

3.27

537

.262

.812

4.70

110

7.47

623

2.17

753

.746

.323

6.65

028

1.11

651

7.76

645

.754

.3Arg

80.445

78.573

159.01

850

.649

.410

8.07

610

7.66

521

5.74

150

.149

.917

3.75

818

2.21

735

5.97

548

.851

.2Essentials

Val

144.41

810

1.17

224

5.59

058

.841

.234

.565

56.246

90.811

38.1

61.9

91.674

100.28

719

1.96

147

.852

.2Met

46.330

43.079

89.409

51.8

48.2

010

.712

10.712

0.0

100.0

20.000

21.966

41.966

47.7

52.3

Ile12

7.63

370

.169

197.80

264

.535

.40

00

0.0

0.0

00

00.0

0.0

Leu

281.82

433

9.66

862

1.49

245

.454

.717

9.07

531

4.57

749

3.65

236

.363

.751

5.87

662

9.37

61,14

5.25

245

.055

.0Th

r18

7.00

811

4.92

830

1.93

661

.938

.173

.625

131.63

020

5.25

535

.964

.114

9.37

321

0.59

135

9.96

441

.558

.5Ph

e86

.028

140.17

022

6.19

838

.062

.074

.689

132.03

620

6.72

536

.163

.913

1.53

228

5.84

441

7.37

631

.568

.5His

44.409

34.098

78.507

56.6

43.4

9.26

722

.099

31.366

29.5

70.5

25.201

28.753

53.954

46.7

53.3

Lys

339.55

931

4.15

465

3.71

351

.948

.119

.513

189.65

220

9.16

59.3

90.7

257.67

232

4.62

058

2.29

244

.355

.8To

tal(%)

b18

75.225

1756

.770

3631

.995

847.30

014

57.693

2304

.993

1913

.726

2676

.509

4590

.236

48.4

66.2

58.3

aNH:n

on-hyd

rolyzedwhe

yproteins

;LDH:low

degree

ofhy

drolysis;H

DH:h

ighde

gree

ofhy

drolysis.

bPe

rcen

tage

ofdialysed

aminoacids(con

centration

ofinternal

aminoacidsin

relation

totheEx

ternal

+Internal).

7A.J. Goulart et al. / Food Research International xxx (2014) xxx–xxx

Please cite this article as: Goulart, A.J., et al., Transport of amino acids fgastrointestinal enzymes, Food Research International (2014), http://dx.do

digestion was simulated in vitro, and two methods (dialyzability andtransport across a Caco-2 cell culture) were used to determine the diffu-sion and transport potential of the amino acids released.

In the present study, several sets of conditions for the production ofthe hydrolysates were investigated; a reaction time of 120 min at 50 °Cyielded the best catalytic efficiency. Another important condition wasinitial hydrolysis with pepsin for 20 min, at 50 °C, followed by thesequential addition of the other enzymes at 10-min intervals, whichenhanced hydrolysis and amino acid release.

The proteins found in whey have high contents of essential aminoacids, sulfated amino acids and branched-chain amino acids in theirpolypeptide chains; these amino acids are involved in the synthesis ofproteins, the homeostasis of glucose and lipid metabolism (Ha &Zemel, 2003; Smithers, 2008). For this reason, whey proteins aretypically used to supplement diets that are low in protein (Volpi,Kobayashi, Sheffield-Moore, Mittendorfer, & Wolfe, 2003). Since thequality of whey proteins and their ability to be rapidly metabolizedand absorbed are widely recognized (Jakubowicz & Froy, 2013), alarge number of studies have been performed to optimize the use ofthese products for nutritional and functional purposes, as well as toinvestigate their interactions with other compounds (Smithers, 2008).

Among these studies, enzymatic hydrolysis is widely employed forthe release of biologically active substances and free amino acids(Sinha et al., 2007) and, given their nutritional quality and functional ca-pacity, hydrolysates of whey proteins have attracted considerable inter-est from the food, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries. However,despite progress in the production of whey protein hydrolysates withvarious enzymes, the antigenicity of these products needs to be studiedfurther (Liu et al., 2008). Methods simulating gastrointestinal digestionhave been widely used to generate diverse hydrolytic products by theaction of digestive enzymes and to determine the behavior of theseproducts in vitro. Among such methods, cell culture (particularly ofCaco-2 cells) and dialyzability assays are frequently employed becausethesemethods are carried out in conditions similar to physiological gas-trointestinal digestion,with regard to temperature, pHand the digestiveenzyme complex, and allow prediction of the diffusion and absorptionrates of bioactive components of foods and pharmaceutical drugs(Hur, Lim, Decker, & McClements, 2011). A dialyzability assay is anin vitro method that involves a two-phase digestive process. This tech-nique simulates gastric and intestinal digestion by dialysis through asemi-permeable membrane with controlled pores. Dialyzability assaysoffer the advantages of fast results, low cost and significant correlationwith in vivo studies, with respect to the total fraction of test substancethat is available for absorption (Sandberg, 2005).

It's necessary to remember that these models are just predictivemodels andwhat happens in the gastrointestinal tract may be different.In the present study, the dialyzability assay was used to determine thebehavior of whey proteins and LDH and HDH hydrolysates under simu-lated gastrointestinal conditions, with respect to the release of aminoacids and their diffusion through a semi-permeable membrane. Whenthe NH (non-hydrolyzed) sample was subjected to gastrointestinal di-gestion, the subsequent dialyzability assay revealed that all essentialamino acids were released. The same result was obtained with theLDH and HDH hydrolysates, with the exception of isoleucine. Analysisof the percentage of dialysis of the detected essential amino acids(Table 2) demonstrated that Leu, Lys and Thr in the LDH hydrolysatewas released in slight greater concentration than that from HDH,whereas Phe concentration was virtually the same in the LDH andHDH samples. Essential branched-chain amino acids, such as Leu, Ileand Val, which are involved in protein synthesis, glucose homeostasisand lipid metabolism, were detected in at least one sample. The samewas true for the S-containing amino acids Cys and Met, which play cru-cial roles as antioxidants and precursors of glutathione and are also in-volved in themetabolism of carbon (Ha& Zemel, 2003; Smithers, 2008).

LHD sample showed higher amount of dialyzable peptides andamino acid than that of HDH sample. One hypothesis for the greater

rom milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action ofi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.01.037

Page 8: Transport of amino acids from milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action of gastrointestinal enzymes

57.1

30.9

13.9 16.1

3.6 2.2 05.110

2030405060708090

100

Ile Leu Tyr Arg

Rel

ativ

e p

erce

nta

ge

*NH

Apical (upper) Basal (lower)

76.6

41.1

20.326.9

8.1 4.1 0

21.8

102030405060708090

100

Ile Leu Tyr Arg

Rel

ativ

e p

erce

nta

ge

*

HDH

Apical (upper) Basal (lower)

22.714.1 15.8

26.7

6.7 4.4 6.116.8

102030405060708090

100

Ile Leu Tyr Arg

Rel

ativ

e p

erce

nta

ge

*

LDH

Apical (upper) Basal (lower)

100.0 100.0 100.0

25.016.9

35.3

2.3 6.6 5.70

20

40

60

80

100

120

NH LDH HDH

Rel

ativ

e p

erce

nta

ge*

*

Total of Ile, Leu, Tyr and Arg applied and transported by Caco-2 cells

Applied Apical side Basal side

Fig. 7.Amino acids transported through a Caco-2 cellmonolayer. *In relation to the total of each applied amino acids. **In relation to the total applied amino acids (Ile+ Leu+Tyr+ Arg).Values are the mean of three experiments and standard deviation b5%.

8 A.J. Goulart et al. / Food Research International xxx (2014) xxx–xxx

diffusion of the LDH sample amino acids is the presence of peptides larg-er than 12 kDa, which can't cross the membrane, however exercising ahigh osmotic pressure, offset by the greater diffusion of these aminoacids until equilibrium. Amino acids in hydrolysate HDH are in greaterconcentration than those in the hydrolysate LDH, but the peptides aresmaller, exerting lower osmotic pressure. This effect occurs becausein vitro systems are closed, with fixed time of two hours (in ourexperiments), without continuous removal of the amino acids diffused,as in a living system.

On the basis of the present experiments, whey proteins (whetherhydrolyzed or not) constitute a considerable source of amino acidswhen subjected to gastrointestinal digestion and possess significantdialyzability. However, diffusion through themembrane was not corre-lated with the relative concentrations of the amino acids detected; de-spite the relatively lower concentrations of methionine, histidine andasparagine, these amino acids diffused to the interior of the membraneat rates exceeding 40%.

The literature includes an increasing number of reports on assessingthe bioavailability of nutrients with cell cultures. Monolayers of cellsfromhuman colon carcinoma line (Caco-2 cells) are themostwidely ac-cepted predictive model of human intestinal absorption in many indus-trial labs and are even cited by the US Food and Drug Administration(Argyri et al., 2009; Fraga, Serrão, & Soares-da-Silva, 2002; Hur et al.,2011; Natoli et al., 2011). The present study is in line with theseinvestigations and, moreover, the whey proteins used were in themost natural form possible for the production of hydrolysates, ratherthan using protein concentrates or isolates.

Leu, Ile and Arg were transported by the monolayer from all threesamples, whereas Tyr was only transported from the LDH sampleunder the conditions of the experiment (Fig. 7). In contrast to the resultsof the dialyzability experiment, in which all amino acids applied werefound inside of the membrane, the cells demonstrated selectivity orpreference in the transport of amino acids. Among the amino acids

Please cite this article as: Goulart, A.J., et al., Transport of amino acids fgastrointestinal enzymes, Food Research International (2014), http://dx.do

evaluated, Leu was one of the most easily dialyzed and also transportedthrough the monolayer of Caco-2 cells in the present study.

The amino acid Leu is of particular interest because it has beenreported to play a crucial role inmetabolism and the regulation of proteinsynthesis, has been identified as a key activator of the mTOR signalingpathway and is involved in the reversible phosphorylation of proteinsthat control the bonding of mRNA to the 40S subunit of ribosomes (Ha& Zemel, 2003). Leu has also been identified as a pharmaconutrientwith the potential to promote muscle hypertrophy, thereby preventingor minimizing sarcopenia (progressive loss of muscle mass and strengthstemming from the aging process) (Katsanos, Kobayashi, Sheffield-Moore, Aarsland, & Wolfe, 2006; Leenders & van Loon, 2011; Volpiet al., 2003). It is estimated that muscle mass is reduced by 3 to 8% perdecade after reaching the age of 30 years, sarcopenia resulting in a greaterthan 30% loss of muscle mass in individuals aged 60 years or older and50% loss of muscle mass in those aged 80 years or older (Paddon-Janes& Rasmussen, 2009). Moreover, sarcopenia leads to the functional capac-ity loss predisposing to the development of chronic metabolic disease,such as obesity or type 2 diabetes (Leenders & van Loon, 2011). Wheyhas a 50 to 75% greater Leu content than that of other protein sources;this high Leu content would likely promote the synthesis of muscle pro-tein and a possible thermogenic effect (Jakubowicz & Froy, 2013). Inpatients with type 2 diabetes, the addition of whey to a meal containingfast-absorbing carbohydrates led to the stimulation of a greaterconcentration of insulin (57% greater after lunch) and the reduction ofpostprandial blood sugar by 21% after 120 min (Jakubowicz & Froy,2013).

5. Conclusions

The milk whey protein hydrolysates obtained after treatment withpepsin, trypsin, chymotrypsin and carboxypeptidase-A showed highbioavailability of essential and non-essential amino acids compared to

rom milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action ofi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.01.037

Page 9: Transport of amino acids from milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action of gastrointestinal enzymes

9A.J. Goulart et al. / Food Research International xxx (2014) xxx–xxx

non-hydrolysed whey proteins. The high percentage of amino acidsdialyzed from LDH and HDH samples suggests that the digestion ofthe cheese whey proteins is better after a prior hydrolysis. The in vitroexperiment with Caco-2 cells indicated the preferential transport ofamino acids Ile, Leu and Arg from whey proteins (NH), LHD and HDHdigest samples through a layer of cells, and possible effects of thesehydrolysates in the reduction of the sarcopenia in aged rats are beingevaluated.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from FAPESP, PNPD-CAPES,FUNDUNESP and PADC-FCFar. The authors thank CAPES (D.P. Marques),CNPq (J.C. Bassan) and PNPD-CAPES (A.J. Goulart) for financial support.Rubens Monti is a Research Fellow of CNPq.

References

Argyri, K., Tako, E., Miller, D.D., Glahn, R. P., Komaitis, M., & Kapsokefalou, M. (2009). Milkpeptides increase iron dialyzability in water but do not affect DMT-1 expression inCaco-2 cells. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57, 1538–1543.

Artursson, P., Palm, K., & Luthman, K. (2012). Caco-2 monolayer in experimental and the-oretical predictions of drug transport. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 64, 280–289.

Au, A. P., & Reddy, M. B. (2000). Caco-2 cells can be used to assess human iron bioavail-ability from a semipurified meal. Journal of Nutrition, 130, 1329–1334.

Bermejo, P., Peña, E. M., Domínguez, R., Bermejo, A., Cocho, J. A., & Fraga, J. M. (2002). Ironand zinc hydrolised fractions of human milk and infant formulas using an in vitromethod. Food Chemistry, 77, 361–369.

Blum, H., Beier, H., & Gross, H. J. (1987). Improved silver staining of plant protein, RNAand DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis, 81, 93–99.

Chang-Shu, Liu, Glahn, R., & Rui Hai, Liu (2004). Assessment of carotenoid bioavailabilityof whole foods using a Caco-2 cell model coupled with an in vitro digestion. Journal ofAgricultural and Food Chemistry, 52, 4330–4337.

Chiplonkar, S. A., Agte, V. V., Tarwadi, K. V., & Kavadia, R. (1999). In vitro dialyzabilityusing meal approach as an index for zinc and iron absorption in humans. BiologicalTrace Element Research, 67, 249–256.

Clare, D. A., & Swaisgood, H. E. (2000). Bioactive milk peptides: A prospectus. Journal ofDairy Science, 83, 1187–1195.

Custódio, M. F., Goulart, A. J., Marques, D. P., Giordano, R. C., Giordano, R. L. C., & Monti, R.(2005). Hydrolysis of cheese whey proteins with trypsin, chymotrypsin and carboxy-peptidase A. Alimentos e Nutrição, 16, 105–109.

Ferruzza, S., Rossi, C., Scarino, M. L., & Sambuy, Y. (2012). A protocol for in situ enzymeassays to access the differentiation of human intestinal Caco-2 cells. Toxicology inVitro, 26, 1247–1251.

Fraga, S., Serrão, M. P., & Soares-da-Silva, P. (2002). L-type amino acid transporters in twointestinal epithelial cell lines function as exchangers with neutral amino acids. Journalof Nutrition, 132, 733–738.

Galvão, C. M., Silva, A. F. S., Custódio, M. F., Monti, R., & Giordano, R. L. C. (2001). Con-trolled hydrolysis of cheese whey proteins using trypsin and alpha-chymotrypsin.Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 91–93, 761–776.

Guadix, A., Guadix, E. M., Páez-Dueñas, M. P., González-Tello, P., & Camacho, F. (2000).Procesos tecnológicos y métodos de control en la hidrólisis de proteínas. ArsPharmaceutica, 41, 79–89.

Ha, E., & Zemel, M. B. (2003). Functional properties of whey, whey components, and es-sential amino acids: mechanisms underlying health benefits for active people.Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 14, 251–258.

Hartree, E. F. (1972). Determination of protein: A modification of the Lowry method thatgives a linear photometric response. Analytical Biochemistry, 48, 422–427.

Herold, G., Besemer, F., & Rogler, D. (1994). Morphology of CaCo-2 cells varies in differentcell batches. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology, 30A, 289–291.

Hubatsch, I., Ragnarsson, E. G. E., & Artursson, P. (2007). Determination of drug perme-ability and prediction of drug adsorption in Caco-2 monolayer. Nature Protocols, 2,2111–2119.

Hur, S. J., Lim, B. O., Decker, E. A., & McClements, D. J. (2011). In vitro human digestionmodels for food applications. Food Chemistry, 125, 1–12.

Jakubowicz, D., & Froy, O. (2013). Biochemical and metabolic mechanisms by which die-tary whey protein may combat obesity and Type 2 diabetes. Journal of NutritionalBiochemistry, 24, 1–5.

Katsanos, C. S., Kobayashi, H., Sheffield-Moore, M., Aarsland, A., & Wolfe, R. R. (2006). Ahigh proportion of leucine is required for optimal stimulation of the rate of muscleprotein synthesis by essential amino acids in the elderly. American Journal ofPhysiology, 291, E-381–E-387.

Please cite this article as: Goulart, A.J., et al., Transport of amino acids fgastrointestinal enzymes, Food Research International (2014), http://dx.do

Kotake-Nara, E., Yonekura, L., & Nagao, A. (2010). Effect of glycerophospholipid class onthe b-carotene uptake by human intestinal Caco-2 cells. Bioscience, Biotechnology,and Biochemistry, 74, 209–211.

Laemlli, U. K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head ofbacteriophage T4. Nature, 227, 680–685.

Leenders, M., & van Loon, L. J. (2011). Leucine as a pharmaconutrient to prevent and treatsarcopenia and type 2 diabetes. Nutritional Reviews, 69, 675–689.

Liu, Li-jun, Zhu, Chuan-he, & Zhao, Zheng (2008). Analyzing molecular weight distribu-tion of whey protein hydrolisates. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 86, 1–6.

Luten, J., Crews, H., Flynn, A., Van Dael, P., Kastenmayer, P., Hurrel, R., et al. (1996).Interlaboratory trial on the determination of the in vitro iron dialysability fromfood. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 72, 415–424.

Madureira, A.R., Pereira, C. I., Gomes, A.M. P., Pintado, M. E., &Malcata, F. X. (2007). Bovinewhey proteins—Overview on their main biological properties. Food ResearchInternational, 40, 1197–1211.

Madureira, A.R., Tavares, T., Gomes, A.M. P., Pintado, M. E., & Malcata, F. X. (2010).Physiological properties of bioactive peptides obtained from whey proteins. Journal ofDairy Science, 93, 437–455.

McDonald, C. E., & Chen, L. L. (1965). The Lowry modification of the Folin reagent fordetermination of proteinase activity. Analytical Biochemistry, 10, 175–177.

Miller, G. L. (1959). Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducingsugar. Analytical Chemistry, 31, 426–428.

Miller, D.D., Schricker, B. R., Rasmussen, R. R., & Van Campen, D. (1981). An in vitrometh-od for estimation of iron availability frommeals. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition,34, 2248–2256.

Monti, J. C., & Jost, R. (1978). Solubilization of cheese whey protein by trypsin and a pro-cess to recover the active enzyme from the digest. Biotechnology and Bioengineering,20, 1173–1185.

Natoli, M., Leoni, B.D., D'Agnano, I., D'Onofrio, M., Brandi, R., Arisi, I., et al. (2011). Cellgrowing density affects the structural and functional properties of Caco-2 differenti-ated monolayer. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 226, 1531–1543.

Neuhoff, V., Stamm, R., & Eibl, H. (1988). Improved staining of proteins in polyacrylamidegels including isoelectric focusing gels with clear background at nanogram sensitivityusing Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 and R-250. Electrophoresis, 9, 255–262.

Oliver, M. H., Harrison, N. K., Bishop, J. E., Cole, P. J., & Laurent, G. J. (1989). A rapid andconvenient assay for counting cells cultured in microwell plates: Application for as-sessment of growth factors. Journal of Cell Science, 92, 513–518.

Paddon-Janes, D., & Rasmussen, B. B. (2009). Dietary protein recommendations and theprevention of sarcopenia: Protein, amino acid metabolism and therapy. CurrentOpinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, 12, 86–90.

Perales, S., Barberá, R., Lagarda, M. J., & Farré, R. (2005). Bioavailability of calcium frommilk-based formulas and fruit juices containing milk and cereals estimated byin vitro methods (solubility, dialyzability, and uptake and transport by Caco-2cells).Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53, 3721–3726.

Pihlanto-Leppälä, A., Rokka, T., & Korhonen, H. (1998). Angiotensin I converting enzymeinhibitory peptides derived from bovine milk proteins. International Dairy Journal, 8,325–331.

Pinto, M., Robine-Leon, S., Appay, M.D., & Kedinger, M. (1983). Enterocyte-like differenti-ation and polarization of the human colon carcinoma cell line Caco-2 in culture.Biology of the Cell, 47, 323–330.

Romarís-Hortas, V., García-Sartal, C., Barciela-Alonso, M. C., Domínguez-González, R.,Moreda-Piñero, A., & Bermejo-Barrera, P. (2011). Bioavailability study using an in-vitro method of iodine and bromine in edible seaweed. Food Chemistry, 124,1747–1752.

Rubio, L. A., & Seiquer, I. (2002). Transport of amino acids from in vitro digested legumeproteins or casein in Caco-2 cell cultures. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,50, 5202–5206.

Sandberg, A. S. (2005). Methods and options for in vitro dialyzability; benefits and limita-tions. International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research, 75, 395–404.

Schmidt, R. H., Packard, V. S., & Morris, H. A. (1984). Effect of processing on whey proteinfunctionality. Journal of Dairy Science, 67, 2723–2733.

Shah, N.P. (2000). Effects of milk-derived bioactives: An overview. British Journal ofNutrition, 84, 3–10.

Silvestre, M. P. C. (1997). Review of methods for the analysis of protein hydrolysates. FoodChemistry, 60, 263–271.

Sinha, R., Radha, C., Prakash, J., & Purnima, K. (2007). Whey protein hydrolysate: Func-tional properties, nutritional quality and utilization in beverage formulation. FoodChemistry, 101, 1484–1491.

Smithers, G. W. (2008). Whey and whey proteins–From “gutter-to-gold”. InternationalDairy Journal, 18, 695–704.

Thivend, P. (1978). Use of whey in feeding ruminants with particular reference to pollutionproblems. Ruminant nutrition: selected articles from the World. Animal Review. FAO(bhttp://www.fao.org/docrep/004/x6512e/X6512E09.htm N Accessed in 10/05/2013)

Volpi, E., Kobayashi, H., Sheffield-Moore, M., Mittendorfer, B., &Wolfe, R. R. (2003). Essen-tial amino acids are primarily responsible for the amino acid stimulation of muscleprotein anabolism in healthy elderly adults. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition,78, 250–258.

Walzem, R. L. (2004). Nutritional properties of whey products. In J. Page, D. Meyer, B.Haines, V. Lagrange, & W. S. ClarkJr. (Eds.), Reference manual for U.S. whey and lactoseproducts (pp. 53–57). Arlington: USDEC.

rom milk whey by Caco-2 cell monolayer after hydrolytic action ofi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.01.037


Recommended