+ All Categories
Home > Documents > TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II AXLE LOAD AND ESAL.

TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II AXLE LOAD AND ESAL.

Date post: 04-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: randell-taylor
View: 217 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
17
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II AXLE LOAD AND ESAL
Transcript
Page 1: TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II AXLE LOAD AND ESAL.

TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II

AXLE LOAD AND ESAL

Page 2: TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II AXLE LOAD AND ESAL.

AXLE LOADS

• One of the primary functions of a pavement is its load distribution. Therefore, in order to adequately design a pavement something must be known about the expected loads it will carry during its design life. Loads, the vehicle forces exerted on the pavement (e.g., by trucks, heavy machinery, airplanes), can be characterized by the following parameters:  – Tire loads – Axle and tire configurations – Repetition of loads – Distribution of traffic across the pavement – Vehicle speed

Page 3: TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II AXLE LOAD AND ESAL.

• Damage caused to the pavements increases sharply with the axle loading. Vehicle loads of private cars and vans contributes very little to structural deterioration. For the purpose of pavement thickness design, only commercial traffic is considered.

Page 4: TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II AXLE LOAD AND ESAL.

STANDARD AXLE LOAD

• Different tests were performed to calculate the thickness of pavement, in relation to the no. of vehicles passing over various portions of roads. Statistical analysis of the data collected showed that relative damaging effect of an axle was approximately proportional to the fourth power of the load which it carries, irrespective of the type or thickness of the pavement.

Page 5: TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II AXLE LOAD AND ESAL.

• An axle carrying a load of 18,000 lbs (8160 kg) was arbitrarily defined in the AASHO road test as a Standard Axle, with a damaging effect of unity.

• The damaging effects of lighter and heavier axles were expressed as equivalence factors as shown in Table. The equivalence factor of .0002 for the 910-kg axle load means that 5000 a passes of such an axle would do the same damaging effect as one pass of standard axle.

Page 6: TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II AXLE LOAD AND ESAL.

DAMAGING EFFECT OF DIFFERENT AXLE LOADS (AASHO ROAD TEST)

AXLE LOADEQUIVALENCE FACTOR

AXLE LOADEQUIVALENCE FACTORKG LBS KG LBS

910 2000 0.0002 9980 22000 2.3

1810 4000 0.0025 10890 24000 3.2

2720 6000 0.01 11790 26000 4.4

3630 8000 0.03 12700 28000 5.8

4540 10000 0.09 13610 30000 7.6

5440 12000 0.19 14520 32000 9.7

6350 14000 0.35 15420 34000 12.1

7260 16000 0.61 16320 36000 15

8160 18000 1* 17230 38000 18.6

9070 20000 1.5 18140 40000 22.8

*Standard axle

Page 7: TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II AXLE LOAD AND ESAL.

EQUIVALENT STANDARD AXLE LOAD

• This approach converts wheel loads of various magnitudes and repetitions ("mixed traffic") to an equivalent number of "standard" or "equivalent" loads based on the amount of damage they do to the pavement. The commonly used standard load is the 18,000 lb. Equivalent Single Axle load. Using the ESAL method, all loads (including multi-axle loads) are converted to an equivalent number of 18,000 lb. single axle loads, which is then used for design. A "load equivalency factor" represents the equivalent number of ESAL’s for the given weight-axle combination.

Page 8: TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II AXLE LOAD AND ESAL.

Generalized Fourth Power Law

• A rule-of-thumb, the damage caused by a particular load is roughly related to the load by a power of four (for reasonably strong pavement surfaces). For example,

• A 18,000 lb (80 kN) single axle, LEF =1.0 • A 30,000 lb (133 kN) single axle, LEF = 7.6 • Comparing the two, the ratio is: 7.6/1.0 = 7.6 Using the fourth power rule-of-thumb:

Thus, the two estimates are approximately equal

Page 9: TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II AXLE LOAD AND ESAL.
Page 10: TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II AXLE LOAD AND ESAL.
Page 11: TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II AXLE LOAD AND ESAL.
Page 12: TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II AXLE LOAD AND ESAL.

Traffic Loads Characterization

Pavement Thickness Design Are Developed To Account For The Entire Spectrum Of Traffic Loads

Cars Pickups Buses Trucks Trailers

Page 13: TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II AXLE LOAD AND ESAL.

Failure = 10,000 Repetitions

13.6 Tons

Failure = 100,000 Repetitions

11.3 Tons

Failure = 1,000,000 Repetitions

4.5 Tons

Failure = 10,000,000 Repetitions

2.3 Tons

11.3 TonsFailure = Repetitions ?

13.6 Tons4.5

Tons

2.3 Tons

Page 14: TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II AXLE LOAD AND ESAL.

Equivalent

Standard ESAL

Axle Load

18000 - Ibs

(8.2 tons)

Damage per Pass = 1

• Axle loads bigger than 8.2 tons cause damage greater than one per pass

• Axle loads smaller than 8.2 tons cause damage less than one per pass

• Load Equivalency Factor (L.E.F) = (? Tons/8.2 tons)4

RELATIVE DAMAGE CONCEPT

Page 15: TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II AXLE LOAD AND ESAL.

Consider two single axles A and B where:

A-Axle = 16.4 tons

Damage caused per pass by A -Axle = (16.4/8.2)4 = 16

This means that A-Axle causes same amount of damage per pass as caused by 16 passes of standard 8.2 tons axle i.e,

8.2 Tons Axle

16.4 Tons Axle

=

Page 16: TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II AXLE LOAD AND ESAL.

B-Axle = 4.1 tons

Damage caused per pass by B-Axle = (4.1/8.2)4 = 0.0625

This means that B-Axle causes only 0.0625 times damage per pass as caused by 1 pass of standard 8.2 tons axle.

In other works, 16 passes (1/0.625) of B-Axle cause same amount of damage as caused by 1 pass of standard 8.2 tons axle i.e.,

Consider two single axles A and B where:

=4.1 Tons

Axle 8.2 Tons

Axle

Page 17: TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II AXLE LOAD AND ESAL.

AXLE LOAD & RELATIVE DAMAGE

1.0

1.1 2.3 3.3

4.7 6.5 8.

7 11.5 14

.9 18.9 23

.8 29.5 36

.3 44.1 53

.163

.4 75.2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80D

AM

AG

E P

ER

PA

SS

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

SINGLE AXLE LOAD (Tons)


Recommended