+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

Date post: 18-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: beverly-leslie-greer
View: 216 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
17
Overview of MnDOT’s Highway Capital Program Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012
Transcript
Page 1: Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

Overview of MnDOT’s Highway Capital Program

Transportation Finance Advisory CommitteeMay 18, 2012

Page 2: Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

141,482 Miles

20,146 Bridges

56.8 billion VMT

The Minnesota Highway System

Page 3: Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

1. What does Minnesota’s highway system look like?

2. How does Minnesota compare to other states?

3. How does Minnesota fund the state highway system?

Agenda

Page 4: Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

1. What does Minnesota’s highway system look like?

Page 5: Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

Minnesota’s Road System

141,482 miles 56.8 billion

Page 6: Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

MnDOT 24% 4,580 Bridges*

Local System 76% 14,786 Bridges*

Other Structures◦ Railroad over Roadway 366 Bridges◦ Pedestrian over Highway 370 Bridges◦ Other 44 Structures

* 10 feet or over, roadway on bridge

Minnesota’s Bridges

Page 7: Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

2. How does Minnesota compare to other states?

Page 8: Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

Total Centerline Miles – 5th Most◦ Minnesota Land Area – 12th Largest◦ Minnesota Population – 21th Largest (2010 Census)

State “Owned” Centerline Miles – 20th Most

State “Owned” Share of Total – 43rd Highest

MnDOT – System Comparison

Page 9: Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

Safety – 2nd Best◦ Fatality rate/100 million vehicle miles traveled

Bridge Condition – 4th Best◦ Percent of bridges rated structurally deficient or

functionally obsolete

Pavement Condition – 44th Best◦ Interstate pavement in poor condition

MnDOT – System Comparison

Page 10: Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

Urban Highway Congestion – 16th Worst◦ Out of 101 metro areas◦ Ratio of peak to free-flow travel time

Urban Traffic Management– 10th Best◦ Out of 101 metro areas◦ Elimination of hours of delay using traffic

management (e.g., ramp meter, incident response, signal coordination, access management, and HOV lanes)

MnDOT – System Comparison

Page 11: Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

3. How does Minnesota fund the state highway system?

Page 12: Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

Federal Fund

Fuel Tax Tire Tax Truck & Trailer

Sales Tax Heavy Vehicle Use

Tax

General Funds

MnDOT – Funding SourcesState Funds

Fuel Tax Vehicle Registration

(License Fees) Motor Vehicle Sale

Tax (MVST) Interest

Bonds

Page 13: Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

14

Page 14: Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

MnDOT – 2005 to 2015 FundingFunding by Source (millions)

482 420

728

353

617488

726 716 677765 759

414

199

72114

258

267 253 262174 148

273

33 2

165 167

21

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

FY2005

FY2006

FY2007

FY2008

FY2009

FY2010

FY2011

FY2012

FY2013

FY2014

FY2015

ARRA

35W EmergencyRelief

TH Bonds

BAP (Bonds andFF)

Regular Programs

Page 15: Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

MnDOT – 2016 to 2032 FundingFunding by Source (millions)

Shown in Nominal / Year of Construction Dollars

Page 16: Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

MnDOT – Revenue Forecast

Page 17: Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

Questions?Mark Gieseke

MnDOT Office of Capital Programs and Performance Measures

(651)[email protected]

MnDOT – Highway Capital Program


Recommended