+ All Categories
Home > Documents > TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

Date post: 02-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: lucas-lee-collins
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
25
TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010
Transcript
Page 1: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE

2006–2010

Page 2: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

CORE DATA SERVICE (CDS) RESPONDENTS

Year DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA

2006 121 62 262 109 76 1632007 115 69 280 113 89 1782008 115 65 259 121 77 1482009 114 62 245 115 84 1492010 106 55 204 98 63 130

Page 3: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

IT REPORTING RELATIONSHIPS, 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Highest academic officerHighest administrative officer President, chancellor, or CEO

Highest business officer

Perc

enta

ge o

f Ins

tituti

ons

2006 20102008 2006 20102008 2006 201020082006 20102008 2006 20102008 2006 20102008

Page 4: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

EXECUTIVE CABINET MEMBERSHIP, 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2006 20102008

Perc

enta

ge o

f Ins

tituti

ons

2006 20102008 2006 20102008 2006 201020082006 201020082006 20102008

Page 5: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

CENTRALIZED IT STAFF (QUARTILES), 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Staff

FTE

s

2006 20102008 2006 201020082006 20102008 2006 201020082006 201020082006 20102008

Note: Bottom of bar = 25th percentile, line in bar = 50th percentile/median, top of bar = 75th percentile.

Page 6: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

CENTRALIZED STUDENT WORKER FTES (QUARTILES), 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Stud

ent W

orke

r FTE

s

2006 20102008 2006 201020082006 20102008 2006 201020082006 201020082006 20102008

Note: Bottom of bar = 25th percentile, line in bar = 50th percentile/median, top of bar = 75th percentile.

Page 7: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

STUDENT FTES SERVED PER CENTRALIZED IT STAFF FTES (QUARTILES), 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Stud

ent F

TEs

Serv

ed p

er S

taff

FTE

2006 20102008 2006 201020082006 20102008 2006 201020082006 201020082006 20102008

Note: Bottom of bar = 25th percentile, line in bar = 50th percentile/median, top of bar = 75th percentile.

Page 8: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

CENTRALIZED IT STAFF AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL IT STAFF (QUARTILES), 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Perc

enta

ge o

f IT

Staff

Cen

tral

ized

2006 20102008 2006 201020082006 20102008 2006 201020082006 201020082006 20102008

Note: Bottom of bar = 25th percentile, line in bar = 50th percentile/median, top of bar = 75th percentile.

Page 9: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

SEPARATE SALARY SCALES FOR IT STAFF, 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

2006 20102008

Perc

enta

ge o

f Ins

tituti

ons

2006 20102008 2006 20102008 2006 201020082006 201020082006 20102008

Page 10: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

SEPARATE JOB TITLES FOR IT STAFF, 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2006 20102008

Perc

enta

ge o

f Ins

tituti

ons

2006 20102008 2006 20102008 2006 201020082006 201020082006 20102008

Page 11: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

STAND-ALONE AND INSTITUTIONAL STRATEGIC PLANS, 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2006 20102008 2006 20102008

Stand-alone and institutional plansInstitutional plan only

Stand-alone plan only

Perc

enta

ge o

f Ins

tituti

ons

2006 20102008 2006 20102008 2006 20102008 2006 20102008

Page 12: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

CENTRALIZED IT FUNDING, ADJUSTED FOR INFLATION (QUARTILES), 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

US

Dol

lars

(Mill

ions

)

2006 20102008 2006 201020082006 20102008 2006 201020082006 201020082006 20102008

Note: Bottom of bar = 25th percentile, line in bar = 50th percentile/median, top of bar = 75th percentile.

Page 13: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

CENTRALIZED IT FUNDING PER STUDENT FTES, ADJUSTED FOR INFLATION (QUARTILES), 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

US

Dol

lars

per

Stu

dent

FTE

2006 20102008 2006 201020082006 20102008 2006 201020082006 201020082006 20102008

Note: Bottom of bar = 25th percentile, line in bar = 50th percentile/median, top of bar = 75th percentile.

Page 14: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

OPERATING APPROPRIATION, ADJUSTED FOR INFLATION (QUARTILES), 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA0

5

10

15

20

25

US

Dol

lars

(Mill

ions

)

2006 20102008 2006 201020082006 20102008 2006 201020082006 201020082006 20102008

Note: Bottom of bar = 25th percentile, line in bar = 50th percentile/median, top of bar = 75th percentile.

Page 15: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

OPERATING APPROPRIATION, ADJUSTED FOR INFLATION PER STUDENT FTE (QUARTILES), 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

2,000

2006 20102008 2006 201020082006 20102008 2006 201020082006 201020082006 20102008

Note: Bottom of bar = 25th percentile, line in bar = 50th percentile/median, top of bar = 75th percentile.

US

Dol

lars

per

Stu

dent

FTE

Page 16: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

STAFF COMPENSATION AS PERCENTAGE OF CENTRALIZED IT FUNDING (QUARTILES), 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Perc

enta

ge o

f Cen

tral

ized

IT F

undi

ng

2006 20102008 2006 201020082006 20102008 2006 201020082006 201020082006 20102008

Note: Bottom of bar = 25th percentile, line in bar = 50th percentile/median, top of bar = 75th percentile.

Page 17: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

STAFF COMPENSATION PER FTE, ADJUSTED FOR INFLATION (QUARTILES), 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

US

Dol

lars

(Tho

usan

ds)

2006 20102008 2006 201020082006 20102008 2006 201020082006 201020082006 20102008

Note: Bottom of bar = 25th percentile, line in bar = 50th percentile/median, top of bar = 75th percentile.

Page 18: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

STUDENT WORKER COMPENSATION PER FTE, ADJUSTED FOR INFLATION (QUARTILES), 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA0

5

10

15

20

25

US

Dol

lars

(Tho

usan

ds)

2006 20102008 2006 201020082006 20102008 2006 201020082006 201020082006 20102008

Note: Bottom of bar = 25th percentile, line in bar = 50th percentile/median, top of bar = 75th percentile.

Page 19: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

CHARGING OF STUDENT TECHNOLOGY FEES, 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA I BA LA BA GEN AA0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2006 20102008

Perc

enta

ge o

f Ins

tituti

ons

2006 20102008 2006 20102008 2006 201020082006 201020082006 20102008

Page 20: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

BASIS FOR STUDENT TECHNOLOGY FEE, 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Flat fee per year, semester, or quarterFlat fee per credit hour or percentage of tuition

Perc

enta

ge o

f Ins

tituti

ons

2006 20102008 2006 20102008 2006 20102008 2006 20102008 2006 20102008 2006 20102008

Page 21: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

COMPUTERS OWNED/LEASED BY THE INSTITUTION PER STUDENT FTE (QUARTILES), 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

Com

pute

rs p

er S

tude

nt F

TE

2006 20102008 2006 201020082006 20102008 2006 201020082006 201020082006 20102008

Note: Bottom of bar = 25th percentile, line in bar = 50th percentile/median, top of bar = 75th percentile.

Page 22: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

PLANNED REPLACEMENT CYCLE FOR INSTITUTIONAL COMPUTERS, 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

More than four yearsFour years Less than three years

Three to four years

Perc

enta

ge o

f Ins

tituti

ons

2006 20102008 2006 20102008 2006 20102008 2006 20102008 2006 201020082006 20102008

Page 23: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

HOURS OF HELP DESK AVAILABILITY (QUARTILES), 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Hou

rs

Note: Bottom of bar = 25th percentile, line in bar = 50th percentile/median, top of bar = 75th percentile.

2006 20102008 2006 201020082006 20102008 2006 201020082006 201020082006 20102008

Page 24: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

STUDENT COMPUTER POLICY, 2006–2010

DR EXT DR INT MA BA LA BA GEN AA0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Recommended for all studentsRecommended in some departments Required in some departments

Required for all students

Perc

enta

ge o

f Ins

tituti

ons

2006 20102008 2006 20102008 2006 20102008 2006 20102008 2006 20102008 2006 20102008

Page 25: TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010.

EDUCAUSE Core Data Service www.educause.edu/coredata


Recommended