TRI-CITY DISPOSAL CO. KENTUCKY Prepared by · BROOKS, BULLITT COUNTY, KENTUCKY EPA ID: KYD981028350...

TRI-CITY DISPOSAL CO. BROOKS, BULLITT COUNTY, KENTUCKY

EPA ID: KYD981028350

Prepared by:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV Atlanta, GA

and

Earth Tech, Inc. 3033 Campus Drive North, Suite 1175

Minneapolis, MN 55441

April 2003

SUPERFUND FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT

TRI-CITY DISPOSAL CO. BROOKS, BULLITT COUNTY, KENTUCKY

EPA ID: KYD981028350

Prepared by:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV Atlanta, GA

and

Earth Tech, Inc. 3033 Campus Drive North, Suite 175

Minneapolis, MN 55441

April 2003

ROUTING SLIP

RE: SECOND FIVE YEAR REVIEW TRI-CITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE BROOKS, BULLITT COUNTY, KY

TO: HAROLD TAYLO

DAVID HARBIN.

+? 4hii& 44+3 FROM: FEMI AKINDELE ................. ............. ........... .. ................. .. ............

NOTE: This is to request the Waste Division Director's signature on the subject report. Please review, sign and date. Please return to sender or call 28809 for pickup. Thank you.

Five-Year Review Report Table of Contents

List of Acronyms Executive Summary Five-Year Review Summary Form I. Introduction 1 II. Site Chronology 2

III. Background 3 Physical Characteristics 3 Land and Resource Use 3 History of Contamination 4 Initial Response 4 Basis for Taking Action 5

IV. Remedial Action 5Remedial Action Objectives/Operable Units 5 Remedy Description 5Remedy Implementation 6System Operation/Operation and Maintenance (O&M) 9

V. Progress Since the Last Review 9

VI. Five-Year Review Process 10Administrative Components 10 Document Review 10Data Review 10Site Inspection 10

VII. Technical Assessment 11 Technical Assessment Summary 12

VIII. Issues 12

IX. Recommendations And Follow-Up Actions 13

X. Protectiveness Statement 13

XI. Next Review 13

i

Five-Year Review Report Table of Contents Cont’d.

Tables

Table l Chronology of'Site Events Table 2 Performance Standards Table 3 Operations and Maintenance Costs Table 4 Five-Year Review Follow Up Actions

Attachments

Attachment A Figures Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site Features Figure 3 Treatment System Schematic

Attachment B Long-Term and Performance Sampling Results Attachment C Monthly System Operation and Inspection Logs Attachment D Results of KDEP Soil Sampling Attachment E Community Involvement Interviews

ii

EPA Five-Year Review Signature Cover Preliminary Information

Site Name: Tri-City Disposal Co. EPA ID: KYD981028350

Region: 04 State: Kentucky City/County: Brooks/Bullitt County

LTRA: No Construction Completion Date: March 1996

Who conducted the review? (EPA Region, State, Federal Agency, Contractor) EPA REG 4, State and PRP’s Consultant, Earth Tech, Inc.

Dates Review Conducted: 11/02–04/03 Dates of Site Visit: 08/29/02 and 2/26/03

Whether first of successive review: Second Review

Type of Review: Statutory Due Date: April 2003

Trigger for this review: Last review signed 04/98

Recycling, reuse, redevelopment site: None

Deficiencies: None noted.

Recommendations: Recommendations are listed in Section IX of this report.

Protectiveness Statements:The remedy at the Tri-City Disposal Site has been in place for ten years and continues to protecthuman health and the environment. Remediation measures at the site continue to remove thecontaminants of concern from the three impacted springs. There have been infrequentexceedances of the performance standards but these exceedances have been insignificant and donot pose a threat to human health or the environment. Water has been provided through a watermain to the residents that were affected by the contaminated springs. Currently, the impactedsprings are not being used as a source of water in the area. The temporary groundwater userestrictions for the site are still in place. Performance and long-term samples continue to becollected as required by the ROD. The results of the long-term sampling show that theconcentrations of contaminants in the groundwater are, in general, declining with time,

Other Comments: None

iii

List of Acronyms

ARAR Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate RequirementERA Emergency Removal ActionGAC Granu1ar Activated CharcoalKDEP Kentucky Department of Environmental QualityKNREPC Kentucky Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet KPDES Kentucky Pollution Discharge Elimination SystemMCL Maximum Contaminant LevelMCLG Maximum Contaminant Level GoalsMW Monitoring WellNPL Nation Priorities ListOU Operable UnitO&M Operation and MaintenancePAH Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonPCE TetrachloroethenePCB Polychlorinated BiphenylPRP Potentially Responsible PartyRAO Remedial Action ObjectivesRI/FS Remedial Investigation/Feasibility StudyROD Record of DecisionSOW Statement of WorkSVOC Semivolatile Organic CompoundTCE TrichloroetheneUAO Unilateral Administrative Orderµg/l micrograms per literUSEPA United States Environmental Protection AgencyVOC Volatile Organic Compound

iv

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The remedy for the Tri-City Disposal Site near Brooks, Bullitt County, Kentucky, includestreating contaminated groundwater, providing drinkable water to affected residents, temporarilyrestricting groundwater usage, collecting confirmatory samples of site soils, sediment, and air toensure that all possible areas of contamination were investigated. The affected springs are stillundergoing treatment by the use of activated charcoal. Other components of the remedy includesampling of groundwater, sediment, and ecology to monitor site-related impacts.

Remedial Action construction began in June 1993 and the site achieved construction completionwith the signing of the Final Construction Inspection Report in March 1996. The first five-yearreview was issued in April 1998. This second review of pertinent documents and site inspectionhas found that the remedy continues to operate as required by the Record of Decision (ROD).The remedy is functioning well to protect human health and the environment.

However, because the concentrations of contaminants in the impacted springs still exceed theMCL or non-zero MCLG, operation and maintenance of the remediation system will continueuntil the site’s performance standards are met. Statutory five-year reviews will be conductedregularly to evaluate site conditions. The next review is scheduled for April 2008.

v

Five-Year Review Summary Form

SITE IDENTIFICATION

Site name (from WASTELan): Tri-City Disposal Co.

EPA ID (from WasteLAN): KYD981028350

Region: IV State: KY City/County: Brooks/Bullitt

SITE STATUS

NPL status: Final

Remediation status: In Progress

Multiple Operable Units (OUs*)? Yes Construction completion date: March 1996

Has site been put into reuse? No

REVIEW STATUS

Lead agency: USEPA Region IV North Site Management Branch

Author name: Carl Shaw and Femi Akindele

Author title: Project Managers Author Affiliation: Earth Tech, Inc. andUSEPA

Review period:** 12/31/97 to 03/31/03

Date of site inspection: 02/26/03

Type of review: Statutory

Review number: 2

Triggering action: 1st Five-Year Review Date

Triggering action date (from WASTELan): Apri1 3, 1998

Due date (five years after triggering action date): April 2003*[“OU” refers to operable unit] **[Review period should correspond to the actual start and end dates of the Five-Year Review in WastcLAN]

Issues:

Most of the requirements of the ROD have already been completed. The remaining itemsinclude:

• Continuing to operate the remediation system on Cox Spring, Unnamed Spring#1, and Klapper Spring;

vi

• Continuing to collect performance samples from the discharges of the remediationsystems; and

• Continuing to collect long-term monitoring samples from monitoring wellsMW-02 and MW-04 until they meet the MCLs or non-zero MCLGs for fiveconsecutive sampling events.

The Kentucky Department of Environmental Protection (KDEP) also has the followingadditional concerns:

• Detections of PCB and lead in surface soil samples that KDEP collected east and south ofI.he treatment building in 1998 and 1999;

• Detections of PCB and lead in surface and subsurface soil samples collected by KDEP inDecember 200l and March 2002 from the pasture located north of the treatment building;

• Lack of restrictions against excavation and building construction within close proximityof site by loca1 residents.

Recommendations and Follow-up Actions:

l. There are four monitoring wells at the site that are no longer used in the long-termmonitoring program. These wells should be plugged and abandoned in the near future.

2. Current levels of O&M monthly inspection, performance sampling, and annual long-termmonitoring at the site should be maintained.

3. Regarding the issues raised by KDEP, the potentially responsible parties (PRPs) willreview the KDEP soil sampling results to determine if they exceed USEPA standards.

4. In addition, the PRPs will review the institutional controls currently in place at the site toensure that they restrict excavation and construction activities near the site boundaries.

5. The PRPs will install signs at appropriate locations around the site to warn residentsagainst excavation and building construction close to the site.

Protectiveness Statement:

The remedy at the Tri-City Disposal Site continues to protect human health and the environment.Remediation system for the three impacted springs remains functional and well maintained.There have been infrequent exceedances of the performance standards, but these exceedances arenot considered to be a threat to human health or the environment. Water has been providedthrough the public water system to the residents that were affected previously by thecontaminated springs. The impacted springs are not currently being used as a source of water.The temporary groundwater use restrictions are still in place and there is no known use of thegroundwater in the affected area. Performance samples and long-term samples continue to becollected as required by the ROD. The results of the long-term sampling show that theconcentrations of contaminants in the groundwater are, in general, declining with time.

vii

TRI-CITY DISPOSAL CO. BROOKS, BULLIT COUNTY, KENTUCKY

FIVE-YEAR REVIEW

I. INTRODUCTION

This is the second five-year review for the Tri-City Disposal Superfund Site located near Brooksin Bullitt County, Kentucky. The purpose of the review is to determine whether the remedyimplemented at the site continues to be protective of human health and the environment,

This review is statutory pursuant to CERCLA (l21 and 40 CFR)300.430(f)(4)(ii) which requiresreviews every five years for those sites where hazardous substances remain on site after theremedial action construction is completed. The trigger date for the current five-year review is thedate of the last review which was signed in April 1998.

The review was conducted from August 2002 through March 3 l 2003, by Carl Shaw, ProjectManager, Earth Tech Inc. and contractor to the PRPs, Femi Akindele, USEPA Project Manager,Ken Logsdon, Project Manager for the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Jim Forney, ProjectManager for Waste Management, Inc., and Scott Hayes, O&M contractor. Community Relationsactivities were conducted by Dianne Barrett, USEPA Region IV. This review report wasprepared by Earth Tech and USEPA project managers.

The remedy implemented at the site involves cleaning contaminated water that flows from localsprings previously used by area residents. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in the springwater remain at levels above those required for unrestricted use. Therefore, a review will beconducted every five years in accordance with CERCLA and NCP requirements.

1

II. SITE CHRONOLOGY

The following table summarizes the dates of the important events in the chronology of theTri-City Disposal site. Further discussion of these events are included in Section III,Background.

Table 1 Chronology of Site Events

Tri-City Disposal Site, Brooks, Bullitt County, KentuckyEvent Date

Operation of the site as a landfill. l964-1967

Lawsuit filed against the landfill and its owners results in closing the landfill. November 1967

KNREPC conducts a preliminary assessment. September 11, l985

KNREPC conducts a site investigation. April 1987

USEPA conducts additional investigations and provides local residents withdrinking water.

May 1988

USEPA conducts an additional study to assess the site’s potential impact onarea residents from groundwater, dust, and direct contact.

June 1988

The site was proposed for inclusion on the Nation Priorities List (NPL). June 24, 1988

The site was placed on the NPL. March 3 l, 1989

USEPA conducted an Emergency Removal Action (ERA). Aug. & Sept. 1988

Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Stud (RI/FS) was published. August 28, 1991

Record of Decision (ROD) for Operab1e Unit (OU) #1 was issued. August 28, 1991

Unilateral Administrative Order (UAO) was issued. March 16, 1992

Remedial Design Work Plan was submitted August 1992

Remedial Design Report-OU #1 was submitted May 1993

Remedial Action Work Plan was submitted September 1993

Remedial Design Report-Unnamed Spring #1 was submitted March 1994

Remedial Action (construction) started June 22, 1993

Operation and Maintenance Plan was submitted November 1994

Final Construction Report was submitted November 1994

Pre-Certification Inspection was submitted May 1995

Final Construction Inspection Report was submitted March 1996

USEPA issued a no further action ROD for OU #2. March 29, 1996

First Five-Year Review was conducted April 3, 1998

2

Event Date

Klapper Spring remediation system (fence) was constructed May 1998

Lightning protection at the treatment system was installed December 2000

KDEP requested additional soil sampling December 11, 2000

Meeting involving KDEP and PRPs to discuss additional sampling April 26, 2001

KDEP indicated that the would conduct the additional sampling September 2001

Hooked-up the Klapper residences to the water main May 2002

III. BACKGROUND

The Tri-City Disposal Superfund Site is 1ocated in the community of Brooks in north-centralBullitt County, Kentucky, approximately l5 miles south of Louisville. The site consists ofapproximately 349 acres and it is located on the south side of State Highway l526 (also known asBrooks Hill Road), approximately four miles west of U.S. Interstate 65. The geographicalcoordinates for the site are 38" 2' 50.9" north latitude and 85º46' 06.1" west longitude. Thelocation of the site is shown on Figure 1 in Attachment A.

Physical Characteristics

The site is located within the Outer Bluegrass physiographic region of Kentucky. The OuterBluegrass Region is characterized by deep valleys with little flat land because it is developed ininterbedded limestones and shales. The easily eroded shales (Borden Formation) form valleysand the ridges between the valleys are capped by the more resistant limestones (HarrodsburghLimestone and Salem Limestone).

Land and Resource Use

The site is in an area of small farms, woodlands, and low-density residential housing. The site ison the top of a ridge (locally referred to as Brooks Hill) that is used for farming, grazing, andlow-density housing. The side of the ridge is very steep and wooded. Brushy Fork Creek islocated in the valley south of the ridge. There are three springs that emanate from the side of theridge south of the site that are impacted.

The site is currently owned by the Cox family who maintains two residences on the property. Inaddition, there are residences located on adjacent property to the north and west of the site.

Water service in the area is provided by the Louisville Water Company via a system of watermains. Wells are not used to provide domestic water in the area because the bedrock generallydoes not yield adequate water. Springs were formerly used by some of the local residents as awater source. Water service has been provided to all of the residences that were using impactedsprings.

3

History of Contamination

The site was an industrial waste landfill operated by Tri-City Industrial Services, Inc. from late1964 to late l967. Most of the waste disposed at the site was scrap lumber and fiberglassinsulation but there were also drummed liquid wastes and bulk liquids that were poured onto theground. There were many citizen complaints concerning odors, fires, explosions, deposition ofash on adjoining properties, eye irritation, and breathing difficulties. These complaints lead to alawsuit for creating a public nuisance and an indictment was served to Tri-City IndustrialServices, Inc. and others in November 1967. The company president, Mr. Harry Kletter, wasarrested and was released after an agreement was negotiated that the charges would be droppedif the company agreed to stop disposing of and burning waste at the site. A fire broke out at thesite at about the same time as the arrest. The fire burned for about two years.

Initial Response

USEPA became involved with the site in September 1985 at the request of the Kentucky NaturalResources and Environmental Protection Cabinet (KNREPC). The KNREPC conducted aPreliminary Assessment of the property in September l985 and conducted a Site Investigation inApril l987. The Site Investigation revealed that there were hazardous substances in the soil andwaste at the site and that Klapper Spring was impacted with tetrachloroethene (PCE) atconcentrations that exceeded the maximum contaminant level (MCL). The Klapper family wasusing Klapper Spring as a source of domestic water at that time.

USEPA conducted additional sampling and provided the Klapper family with an alternate watersupply in May l988. USEPA also discovered that the Cox family was using water from CoxSpring as a potable water source and immediately provided them with an alternative watersupply. USEPA conducted a survey of potable water sources within a radius of approximatelyone-half mile of the site. This survey again showed PCE in Klapper Spring and elevated levels ofPCE and trichloroethene (TCE) in Cox Spring. USEPA conducted an additional study to assessthe site’s potential impact on area residents from groundwater, dust, and direct contact in June l988. The site was placed on the NPL in March 1989 with a Hazard Ranking Score of 33.82.

USEPA conducted an Emergency Removal Action (ERA) in August and September 1988 froman area south of the Cox, Sr. residence. The ERA was initiated when the Cox family reportedthat a “black ooze” was emanating from their side yard. USEPA contractors investigated the“black ooze” and found elevated levels of xylene, toluene ethylbenzene, and lead. USEPAcontractors then conducted geophysical surveys and field analytical screening in August 1988and found that waste disposal was concentrated at the southern half of the site. The ERA wasconducted in August and September 1988 at the south side of the Cox, Sr. residence. The ERAinvolved excavating and removing approximately 165 drums, many crushed and empty drums,metal containers of various sizes, auto parts, 400 gallons of free liquids, and over 800 cubicyards of suspected contaminated soil. Several test trenches were also excavated in areas ofgeophysical anomalies that revealed empty drums and drums containing solids along withfiberglass insulation, wires, and ashes but no drums of liquid waste.

USEPA began a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) in July 1989 to characterizethe site and determine the nature and extent of contamination. The RI/FS was published in May1991.

4

Basis for Taking Action

The basis for taking action at the site was the use of the impacted spring water as a domesticwater source. The water in some of the springs on and around the site is impacted with VOCsincluding PCE and TCE at concentrations above the MCL or non-zero MCLGs.

IV. REMEDIAL ACTION

Remedial Action Objectives/Operable Units

Based on the results of the RI/FS and to expedite action, the site was divided into two operableunits (OUs). OU #1 included the remediation of contaminated groundwater and confirmatorysampling to identify any unacceptable levels of hazardous contaminants in areas of the propertynot previously addressed. OU #2 was proposed to address additional measures necessary tomitigate any threat to human health or the environment identified during the confirmatorysampling in OU #l.

The Record of Decision (ROD) for OU #I was issued in August 1991. The Remedial ActionObjectives (RAOs) for OU #1, as described in the Statement of Work (SOW), are:

• Treat groundwater having contaminant concentrations in excess of MCLs ornon-zero maximum contaminant level goals (MCLGs);

• Continue providing potable water to residents affected by groundwater containingcontaminant concentrations in excess of MCLs or non-zero MCLGs;

• Restrict usage of groundwater for domestic purposes until monitoring indicatesthat the water is of sufficient and consistent quality for human consumption;

• Conduct confirmatory sampling of site soils, sediment, and ambient air to ensurethat all possible areas of contamination as identified in the ROD are investigated;and

• Perform long-term monitoring of groundwater, surface water, sediment, andecology to identify additional site-related impacts.

The confirmatory samples were collected in 1992 for OU #1 and were evaluated by USEPA todetermine if there was a need for a second operable unit remedial action at the site. Based on theresults of the evaluation, USEPA determined that there was no need to initiate a second operableunit at the site. Therefore, a “No Action” ROD was issued for OU #2 in March 1996.

Remedy Description

Remedial action is currently being conducted at the site to address the requirements of the RODfor OU #1. These requirements are:

• Treating contaminated groundwater, • Continuing to provide drinkable water to affected residents, • Temporarily restricting groundwater usage, • Collecting confirmatory samples of site soils, sediment, and air to ensure that all possible

areas of contamination were investigated (completed in 1992), and

5

• Performing long-term monitoring of groundwater, sediment, and ecology to identifyadditional site-related impacts.

Groundwater or spring water is considered remediated if sampling shows the concentrations arebelow the MCL or non-zero MCLG for five consecutive rounds of sampling. Locations of thesampling points are shown on Figure 2 in Attachment A.

Remedy Implementation

Treatment of Contaminated Spring Water

Remedial action began in May l994, and is conducted to clean up impacted water from threesprings at the site. PCE concentrations in these springs have been consistently higher than theMCLs and non-zero MCLGs. Therefore, remediation is still in progress at this time. Cox Springand Unnamed Spring No. 1 have been undergoing treatment since May l994 and Klapper Springhas been undergoing treatment since April 1998. The treatment in Cox Spring and UnnamedSpring No. 1 involves collecting the spring water and pumping it through a granular activatedcharcoal (GAC) treatment system. Once treated, the water is returned to the springs. A schematicof the treatment process is included in Figure 3 in Attachment A.

Klapper Spring has had only sporadic detections of PCE that exceed the MCL or non-zeroMCLG. The remedial action involves enclosing Klapper Spring and an area approximately 50feet down-stream with a chain link fence to limit access to the impacted water. This remedialaction limits access to the impacted water for the short distance required for the PCE to naturallyair-strip from the water.

The discharge from the treatment systems is required to meet a performance standard that is thelower of the MCL/non-zero MCLG or Kentucky Pollution Discharge Elimination System(KPDES) standard. Discharge samples are collected monthly and are analyzed for selectedVOCs. The performance standards are shown in Table 2.

All results from the discharge of the treatment systems at Cox Spring and Unlimited Spring No lhave been within the performance standards. Klapper Spring has had six occasions over the pastfive years when the water discharging from the remediation system (fence) slightly exceeded theperformance standard for PCE. The performance sampling results for Cox Spring, UnnamedSpring No. 1, and Klapper Spring are included in Attachment B.

There have been times when the monthly inspection discovered that the treatment system wasnot operating. In each case, the cause of the problem was quickly identified and was corrected assoon as possible. The most common reason for the remediation system to be down was lightningstrikes to the system’s electrical controls. Lightning protection was installed in December 2000to help minimize the effects of the frequent lightning strikes. The Cox Spring system was alsodown in 2000 due to the property owner inadvertently cutting the pump controller line from thetreatment building to Cox Spring. Instead of fixing the controller line, a float switch wasinstalled in the holding tank at Cox Spring.

6

Table 2 Performance standards

Tri-City Disposal, Brooks, Bullitt County, Kentucky

Constituent MCL/non-zero MCLG (µg/L) KPDES (µg/L)

Chloroform 100 15.7

1,1-Dichloroethene 7 1.85

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 70 1.85

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 100 1.85

Tetrachloroethene 5 8.85

Toluene 1,000 424,000

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 1,300,000

Trichloroethene 5 80.7

Vinyl Chloride 2 525

Xylenes 10,000 no criteria

Provision of Potable Water

Potable water is continuing to be provided to the affected residents. The two Cox residences andthe two Klapper residences are connected to the Louisville Water Company water main. The Coxresidences were connected to the water main in 1995 and the two Klapper residences wereconnected to the water main in May 2002. Prior to connecting the two Klapper residences to thewater main, the residences were provided water via cisterns that were replenished with potablewater via tanker truck on an as-needed basis. The cost to connect the residences to the watermain and the cost of the potable water to the Klapper residences prior to connection to the watermain were paid by the PRPs.

Temporary Restriction of Groundwater Usage

Temporary restriction of groundwater usage is still in effect and site visits show that. the waterfrom the affected springs is not being used as a domestic water source. The collection systemused at Cox Spring to provide water to the Cox residences was dismantled to construct theremediation collection system so it is not possible for the water from Cox Spring to be used bythe Cox families. The Klapper Spring collection system has also been taken out of service and issurrounded by a chain link fence so it is not currently being used by the Klapper residences fordomestic use. The Unnamed Spring No. I was never used as a domestic water source and siteinspection confirms that it is not currently being used.

Confirmatory Sampling

Confirmatory samples were collected during an investigation conducted by Rust Environment &Infrastructure (now Earth Tech) in 1992. The confirmatory sampling involved collecting and

7

analyzing surface soil, subsurface soil, surface water, and sediment samples, The results of thesampling indicated that there was no unacceptable risk presented to human health or theenvironment from surface soil, subsurface soil, surface water, or sediment at the site

Long-Term Monitoring

Long-term monitoring is continuing at the site in accordance with the Field Sampling Plan, datedOctober l992. The plan calls for long-term monitoring of five springs and six groundwatermonitoring wells and ecological monitoring consisting of surface water, sediment, and toxicitytesting. The following provides a summary of the current status of the long-term monitoringprogram.

• Cox Spring, Unnamed Spring No. 1, and Klapper Spring – These springs arecurrently undergoing remediation and are not included in the long-termmonitoring program. However, long-term samples are also being collectedperiodically to track the concentrations of contaminants in the spring water. Sincethe concentrations exceed the MCL or non-zero MCLG at least some of the timein each of the springs, remediation is continuing. Plots of the long-termmonitoring data for PCE in these springs are included in Attachment B.

• Brading Spring No. 2 - Brading Spring No. 2 was sampled from l992 through1998. There were no exceedances of the MCLs or non-zero MCLGs since 1994.Therefore, the long-term monitoring of Brading Spring No. 2 is complete.

• Cattle Spring - Cattle Spring was sampled according to the long-term monitoringprogram from l992 through 1998. Since there were no exceedances of the MCLsor non-zero MCLGs, the long-term monitoring of Cattle Spring was discontinued.

• Groundwater Monitoring Wells - Groundwater samples have been collectedfrom six groundwater monitoring wells at the site. Monitoring well MW-02 hasshown detections of VOCs that exceed the MCLs or non-zero MCLGs each timeit has been sampled so it continues to be monitored on an annual basis.Monitoring well MW-04 has had periodic detections of VOCs that exceed theMCLs or non-zero MCLGs. Because this well has not had five sampling events ina row that do not exceed the MCLs or non-zero MCLGs, it continues to bemonitored on an annual basis. MW-05 has had no detections that exceed theMCLs or non-zero MCLGs since 1997 so long-term monitoring of MW-05 iscomplete. Monitoring wells MW-08, MW-11, and MW-12 had no exceedancesduring the five years that they were sampled so long-term monitoring is complete.For monitoring wells MW-02 and MW-04, monitoring will continue until therehave been five consecutive sampling events without an exceedance of the MCLsor non-zero MCLGs. Plots of the long-term monitoring data for PCE inmonitoring wells MW-02, MW-04, and MW-05 are included in Attachment B.

• Ecological Monitoring - Ecological monitoring was conducted fourth quarter1992 (baseline), third quarter 1993, and third quarter 1997. The monitoringinvolved collecting surface water and sediment samples for VOCs, semivolatileorganic compounds (SVOC), and metals analyses, and collecting water samples

8

for toxicity testing (water spider and flathead minnow survival and reproductiontests). The fifth year sampling event was conducted in July 1997 and the resultsshowed that there were no exceedances of the MCLs or non-zero MCLGs in thesurface water and sediment, and that the surface water was not toxic. Evaluationof these results indicates that the site does not pose an adverse effect on theecology of Brushy Fork Creek.

System Operation/Operation and Maintenance (O&M)

The PRPs are conducting O&M of the treatment systems, discharge monitoring of the treatmentsystem effluent, and long-term monitoring according to the O&M Plan. The primary activitiesinclude:

• Operating the treatment system for Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring No l; • Inspecting the treatment system (fencing) at Klapper Spring; • Collecting performance samples from the treatment systems on a monthly basis; • Conducting a monthly inspection of the site and the systems; • Conducting long-term monitoring; and • Recording O&M activities monthly on a system operation and inspection log.

The O&M costs incurred for the site include routine inspection and maintenance, granularactivated carbon drums, collecting and analyzing performance samples, collecting and analyzinglong-term monitoring samples, and reporting. The following table summarizes the O&M costsincurred at the site during the past five years.

Table 3 Operations and Maintenance Costs*

Tri-City Disposal, Brooks, Bullitt County, Kentucky

From To Total Cost**

l/1/981 2/31/98 $485,000

1/1/99 12/31/99 $68,000

1/0/00 12/31/00 $32,000

1/0/01 12/31/01 $55,000

1/0/02 12/31/02 $38,000*O&M costs also include the cost of water hookup and agency oversight..**Costs are rounded to the nearest $1,000.

V. PROGRESS SINCE THE LAST REVIEW

The following progress has been made at the site since the last five-year review;

• The remediation system (fence) was installed at Klapper Spring.

9

• The two Klapper residences were provided with potable water via extending thewater main. It is no longer necessary to truck water to fill the cisterns at theresidences.

• Lightning protection was installed at the building that houses the Cox Spring andUnnamed Spring #1 treatment systems.

• Long-term monitoring has been completed at monitoring well MW-05. • Discussions have been held by the PRPs and KDEP concerning additional soil

sampling at the site. A meeting was held to discuss KDEP’s concerns and severalsampling plans were submitted. KDEP rejected PRP’s proposals and opted toconduct the sampling. The sampling results have been recommended forevaluation and PRP follow-up in this report.

VI. FIVE-YEAR REVIEW PROCESS

Administrative Components

USEPA Region IV, the Commonwealth of Kentucky and the PRPs collaborated in conductingthis five-year review. The PRPs were represented by Waste Management Inc. and theircontractor, Earth Tech, Inc. Earth Tech completed the draft report in January 2002 and prepareda revised report after addressing comments from USEPA and the State in March 2003. This finalversion of the report was prepared by USEPA.

Document Review

The documents reviewed during this five-year review include:

• 1st Five-Year Review Report April 3, 1998• Record of Decision, OU #1 August l991• Remedial Action Statement of Work August 1991• Unilateral Administrative Order March 4, 1992• Record of Decision, OU #2 March 1996• Operation and Maintenance Plan November 1994• Monthly System Operation and Inspection Logs 1998-2002• Performance Sampling Results 1998-2002• Long-Term Sampling Results 1998-2002

Data Review

The data reviewed for this five-year review include the following. All of these items are includedin Attachment B.

• Monthly discharge monitoring results; and • Plots of PCE levels versus time for long-term sampling results.

Site Inspection

A joint inspection of the site was conducted by USEPA, KDEP, and Earth Tech on February 26,

10

2003, as part of this review. The following observations were made during the inspection.

• The remediation building for Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring #1 was properlysecured with a padlock.

• The remediation systems were both operating properly. • The lightning protection system was operating properly. • The building contained five virgin GAC drums and no spent GAC drums. • The fence surrounding Klapper Spring was secure. • The springs were not being used as a source of domestic water by local residents. • The three monitoring wells sampled periodically were secure and functional. • There are four monitoring wells at the site which are no longer used in the

monitoring program that should be abandoned.• The State representative provided a sample location map and sampling results for

soil samples collected at the site in December 2001 and March 2002.

Community Involvement Activities

In March 2003, USEPA announced that the remedy at the site was under review in the localnewspaper, conducted telephone interviews with local residents and invited comments onactivities related to the site. Responses to the interviews were mixed. Some people were pleasedoverall and some expressed displeasure with the method and extent of the cleanup implementedat the site. In any case, no one identified a specific problem to indicate that the objectives of theremedy at the site are not being met currently. Copies of the telephone interviews are inAttachment E.

Results of this review will be summarized and reported to the public in a fact sheet andpublished in the local newspaper by USEPA. Copies of the entire report will be placed in theUSEPA record center in Atlanta Georgia, the USEPA website and the repository for the site atRidgeway Memorial Library, l27 Walnut Street, Shepherdsville, Kentucky.

VII. TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT

Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents?

The review of documents, applicable or relevant and appropriate requirement (ARARs), riskassumptions, and the results of the site inspection indicate that the remedy is functioning asintended by the ROD. The remedial actions have achieved the objectives of minimizing exposureto affected spring water.

The remediation systems sometimes do not operate due to equipment problems. The mostcommon problems have been the result of lightning strikes that burn out the pump controllercircuitry. A lightning protection system was installed to minimize the outages due to lightningstrikes. Ln another case, Mr. Cox cut the controller line to Cox Spring while doing some gradingon his property. In both cases, the problems were fixed and the systems were back on line assoon as possible. In the case of Klapper Spring, the discharge at the fence line occasionallyexceeds the performance standard. There were six monthly performance samples from KlapperSpring that exceeded the performance standard over the five years of monthly monitoring

11

conducted at the spring. These exceedances are not considered a threat to human health or theenvironment because the VOCs quickly air strip from the water and the area is inaccessible dueto the rugged terrain.

Question B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, and remedialaction objectives (RAOs) used at the time of the remedy selection still valid?

There have been no changes to the physical conditions of the site or the adjacent land use thatwould affect the protectiveness of the selected remedy. The RAOs for the site are still valid andare in effect at the site.

Question C: Has any other information come to light that could call into question theprotectiveness of the remedy?

There has been no other information that has come to light that could call into question theprotectiveness of the remedy.

Technical Assessment Summary

Tn summary, no significant issues were noted during the five-year review of the remedial actioncomponents. Water continues to be provided to the affected residents and a water main wasinstalled to better ensure delivery of potable water. The long-term sampling shows that much ofthe site is no longer impacted and that long-term monitoring in those areas is complete.Long-term monitoring has also demonstrated that the concentrations of contaminants in theimpacted springs are generally decreasing with time. The treatment systems are effectivelycleaning up the water that discharges from the springs. Occasionally, the remediation systemshave encountered mechanical problems. These are usually repaired immediately to minimizedown-time. Concentrations of VOCs in the water samples sometimes exceed performancestandards. Nevertheless, concentration trends for the compounds have continued to decline sincethe last five-year review. Therefore, the remedy at the site is performing satisfactorily andcontinues to provide human health and environmental protection.

VIII. ISSUES

Most of the requirements of the ROD have already been completed. The remaining itemsinclude:

• Continuing to operate the remediation system on Cox Spring, Unnamed Spring #l,and Klapper Spring;

• Continuing to collect performance monitoring samples from the discharges of theremediation systems; and

• Continuing to collect long-term monitoring samples from monitoring wellsMW-02 and MW-04 until the results meet the MCLs or non-zero MCLGs for fiveconsecutive sampling events.

In addition, there are four wells (MW-05, MW-08, MW-11, and MW-l2) al the site that are nolonger used in the long-term sampling program and they should be abandoned.

12

KDEP raised three issues at the time of the site inspection. The issues are as follows:

• KDEP reiterated their concern about surface soil east and south of the treatmentbuilding based on samples collected by KDEP in 1998 and l999.

• KDEP provided the results of surface and subsurface soil samples that theycollected near the houses in December 2001 and from the pasture located north ofthe treatment building in March 2002. The results show that there are no concernsin the soil around the houses. The results are included in Attachment D.

• KDEP expressed concern about apparent lack of restrictions against excavatingand land disturbance within close proximity of the site by local property owners.

IX. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS

It is necessary to maintain the current O&M monthly inspection, monthly performancesamp1ing, and annual long-term monitoring at the site. In addition, there are four monitoringwells at the site that are no longer used in the long-term monitoring program that should beabandoned.

Regarding the issues raised by KDEP, the PRPs will review the KDEP soil sampling results todetermine if they exceed USEPA standards. In addition, the PRPs will review the institutionalcontrols currently in place at the site to ensure that they restrict excavation and constructionactivities within close proximity of the site and to maintain remedy integrity. The follow upactions recommended for the site are included in Table 4.

Table 4 Five-Year Review Follow Up Actions

Tri-City Disposal, Brooks, Bullitt County, KentuckyAction Responsible

Party Oversight

AgencyMilestone

DateAffects

Protectiveness

Current Future

Abandon unused wells PRPs USEPA Sept. 2003 No No

Continue O&M Inspections PRPs USEPA Ongoing No

Continue Performance Monitoring PRPs USEPA Ongoing No

Continue Long-Term Monitoring PRPs USEPA Ongoing No

Review KDEP Soil SamplingResults

PRPs USEPA Sept. 2003 No No

Review Institutional controls andaddress deficiencies as necessary

PRPs USEPA Sept. 2003 No No

X. PROTECTIVENESS STATEMENT

The remedy at the Tri-City Disposal Site currently protects human health and the environment.Remediation measures at the site continue to remove the compounds of concern from the three

13

impacted springs. There have been infrequent exceedances of the performance standards butthese exceedances are not considered to be a threat to human health or the environment. Waterhas been provided through a water main to the residents that were affected by the contaminatedsprings. The impacted springs are not currently being used as a source of water. The temporarygroundwater use restrictions are still in place and there is no known use of the groundwater inthe affected. area. Performance samples and long-term samples continue to be collected asrequired by the ROD. The results of the long-term sampling show that the concentrations ofcontaminants in the groundwater are, in general, declining with time.

XI. NEXT REVIEW

The next five-year review is scheduled for April 2008.

14

Attachment A

Figures

Attachment B

Long-Term and Performance Sampling Results

TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MONITORING RESULTS IN COX SPRING AND UNNAMED SPRING NO. 1

TRI-CITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL BROOKS, BULLITT COUNTY, KENTUCKY

TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE MONITORING RESULTS IN COX SPRING, UNNAMED SPRING NO. 1, AND

KLAPPER SPRING TRI-CITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL

BROOKS, BULLITT COUNTY, KENTUCKY

Dry Spring was dry and was not sampled J Estimated value below the method detection limit Bold Performance monitoring result exceeds the performance standard




J Estimated value below the method detection limit Bold Performance monitoring result exceeds the performance standard




- - n -

Cox - -

c1.0

- - :ay 19 - UN- #I -

c1 .o

- - J -

Cox - c1.0

June 1999 I . . . Units . :

Chloroform

1 , l -Dichloroethene

Cis-1.2-Dichloroethene

Trichloroethene

Vinyl Chloride p a I

XyIene I P&

NS Not saxmled Dry Spring was dry and was not sampled J Estimated value below the method detection limit Bold Perfonnance monitoring result exceeds the performance standard


KLAPPER SPFUNG TRI-CITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL





ANALYTE

Dry Spring was dry and was not sampled J Estimated value below the method detection limit Bold Performance monitoring result exceeds the performance standard




Dry Spring was dry and was not sampled J Estimated value below the method detection limit Bold PGrforrnance monitoring result exceeds the performance standard




Bold Performance monitoring result exceeds the performance standard




I I Nov. 20 ANALYTE Units

Chloroform pgn <1.0 c1.0

I I I

Tetrachloroethene

Toluene

I , I, l -Trichloroethane

Trichloroethene

Vinyl Chloride p g n a.0 a.0

Xylene ugIL Q.0 4.0

11 Dec. 2001 J

KIP COX KIP cox Iijy -- Dry 4.0 <1.0 11.0 4.0

Dry 0 <1.0 -4.0 4.0

Dry 4.0 c1.0 < I 0 4.0

4.5 c0.5 a.5 4 . 5

in. 2002 . - I Feb. 2002.

I KIP I Cox I UN I Klp #1

I I I I

- - 1 -

Cox - -=I ,o - <I .o - <I .o

ar. 2002 AD^. 2002

Klp Cox U#J Klp I I I I

NS Not sampled Dry Spring was dry and was not sampled J Estimated value below the method detection limit Bold Performance monitoring result exceeds the performance standard




NS Not sampled Dry Spring was dry and was not sampled J Estimated value below the method detection limit Bold Performance monitoring result exceeds the performance standard

PCE Long-Term Monitoring Results Cox Spring

+ PCE Result

-5 ug/L Objective

I I I I I I I I I I

Date Sampled I

Note: This spring is undergoing treament to remove PCE to below the performance standard.

PCE Long-Term Sampling Results Unnamed Spring #1

-5 ug/L Objective

I - +I

-

I I I I I I I I

Date Sampled I I Note: This spring is undergoing treament to remove PCE to below the performance standard.

PCE Long-Term Sampling Results Klapper Spring

120

A 100 \ m 3 - 80 CI - z V) 60 Q)

40 W

20 e

0

8 8 96 9% 8 Q 9% 9% 99 99 8 6 6 Q% Q! @' 0$ #' 08 8' *ci' @' o& +jQ oci' p-9 03 &' 08 6' 08

Date Sampled

Note: This spring is undergoing treament to remove PCE to below the performance standard.

- A

1 + PCE Result - 5 ug/L Objective

A

/"\ J

I I - 1 I

PCE Long-Term Sampling Results

Date Sampled

Note: This well has had detections that exceed the performance standard so long-term monitoring will continue in this well.


- + PCE Result

- 5 ug/L Objective

I Date Sampled I

Note: This well has had detections that slightly exceed the performance standard so long-term monitoring will continue in this well.


+ PCE Result -5 ug/L Objective

A A A * A A 1 - I 4 A - -

Date Sampled I

Note: This well has had five consecutive sampling events that are below the performance standard so long-term monitoring is completed for this well.

Attachment C

Monthly System Operation And Inspection Logs

T+C CONTRACTING, INC. 6301 PENDLETON ROAD P.O. BOX 72398 LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY 40272-0398

Mr. James Forney Waste Management Inc. 1725 Newburgh Rd., Suite #I 00 Livonia, MI. 49152

RE: Tri-City Disposal Site, Operation\Maintenance Report (1 -98).

Mr. Forney;

On 2-2-98, the operations and maintenance requirements were performed at the Tri-City disposal site according to the O&M plan.

a Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #I was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring #l. Samples were-taken from Klapper Spring, spring and stream were running. All samples sent for analysis.

a END OF REPORT

Please call should you have any questions regarding this or any other maintenance report.

Thank you,

Scott A Hayes '

Cc: Carl Shaw - RUST E&l

SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECTION LOG TRI-CITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE

OPERABLE UNIT #1 / '

I Ambient Temp. (OF)-- Weather Conditions: P C . I 1. Three-way valve position h/mfld - 2. Pressure gauge reading:

3. Flow meter reading: a?& gy gallons g,o -.

I Action Yes No Required

4. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and . Spring House is acceptable?

5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition?

6. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House?

7. Three!-way valve position or auxiliary): J3nmfl d' 8. Pressure gauge reading: b ‘L) psig

9. Flow meter reading: . /S 7749 galtons I?# A gpm

Action Yes No Required

10. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable? d o 1

12. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Collection Structure?

11. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? &'a

13. Number of spent carbon dnrms in building. 3 14. Number of virgin carbon dnrms in building. a4


15. General housekeepingldebris around Treatment Building is [Y 0 -, acceptable?

16. Building structure (roof, doom, paint) in acceptable condition?

17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves, equipment? n' El' 18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire exthgukher in

acceptable condition? v El-:

19. Heat tracing and d m heaters in acceptable condition? D" 0- 20. Level sensors functional?

2 1. Pressure switches/actuators functional?

22. Automatic dialerfphone line functional?

Item # /&P/ A ~ A ' A ~ ~ ~

C/

T+C CONTRACTING, INC. 6301 PENDLETON ROAD P.O. BOX 72398 LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY 40272-0398

Mr. James Fomey Waste Management Inc. 17250 Newburgh Rd., Suite #lo0 Livonia, MI. 481 52

RE: Tri-City Disposal Site, Operation\Maintenance Report (2-98).

Mr. Forney;

On 2-26-98, the operations and maintenance requirements were performed at the Tri-City disposal 'site according to the O&M plan.

Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #1 was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring #l. Samples were-taken from Klapper Spring, spring and stream were running. All samples sent for analysis. END OF REPORT


Thank you,

Scott A. Hayes


. SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECIlON LOG TRI-CI'W INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE UNIT #1

Date: a -*~, -9 r Time: In 7 A Operator: . rdh/ 1 Ambient Temp. (OF) 5-0 ' Weather Conditions: &!!n fi ./

e- or a m ) : 1. Tluee-way valve position

2. Pressure gauge reading: K C 3. Flow meter reading:


4. General housckeepingldebris around Collection Tank and Spring ~ o & e is acceptable? B/u: a.


6. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or u Spring House?

1 7. Three-way valve poritiod'@or auxiliary): 8. Pressure gauge reading: psig - . -

9. Flow meter reading: . -

./ vq o. f A gallons

Action .

10. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable? d'

1 1. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? B/u 0

12. Significant accumulation of solids in CoIlection Tank or Collection Structure?

13. Number of spent carbon drums in building.

14. Number of virgin carbon drums in building.

Action

15. General howekeeping/de~s around Treatment Building is - acceptable? 16. Building structure (roof, doors, paint) in acceptable

condition? 1 7. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves, equipment?

18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fiie extinguisher in acceptable condition?

19. Heat tracing and drum heaters in acceptable condition?

I 20. Level sensors functional?

I 2 1. Pressure switches/actuators functio~lal?

( 22. Automatic dider/phone line functional?

Comments Item #

T+C CONTRACTING, INC. 6301 PENDLETON ROAD RO. BOX 72398 LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY 40272-0398

Mr. James Forney Waste Management Inc. 17250 Newburgh Rd., Suite #I 00 Livonia, MI. 48152


Mr. Fomey; "


Treatment building was found in good condilion with no serious deficiencies - found. Cox Spring was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #1 was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring #1. Samples were-taken from Klapper Spring, spring and stream were running. All samples sent for analysis. END OF REPORT

Please call sliould you have any questions regarding this or any other maintenance report.

Thank you,

Scott A. Hayes


SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECXION LOG TRI-CITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE UNIT #1

2. Pressure gauge reading: 3. Flow meter reading:

4. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and .- Sprhg House is acceptable?


8. Presscue gauge reading:

9. Flow meter reading: P m

10. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collectfon Structure is acceptable?

1 1. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? ' d o 12. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

Collection Structure? akk3-0 O b -

14. Number of virgin carbon drum in building.

1 5. General housekeepingldebris around Treaiment Building is

16. Building structure (roof, doors, paint) in acceptable

17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves, equipment?

18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire extinguisher in acceptable condition?

19. Heat tracing and d m heaters in acceptable condition?

20. Level sensors functional?


Mr. James Fomey Waste Management Inc. 17250 Newburgh Rd., Suite #lo0 Livonia, MI. 48152

RE: Tri-City Disposal Site, OperationWaintenance Report (4-98).

Mr. Fomey;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no dd~ciencies found. Unnamed Spring #I was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the produdion discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring #I. Samples wre_taken from Mapper Spring, spring and stream were running. All samples sent for analysis. END OF REPORT


Thank you,

Scott A. Hayes


!3YSTEM OPERATION AND LNSPECI'ION LOG TRI-CITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE UNIT #1

Ambient Temp. ("F) ~ 3 s ~ ' Weather Conditions: & T& k%?rrr

1 I A

=y v b p , o n e - o r a-1: m%,,d -

2. Pressure gauge reading: //, J .

3. Flow meter reading: allots m -.

Action Y N o . l R e

4. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and . Spring House is acceptable? d~ U-

5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? d n: 6. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

Spring House?

Action Yes No 1 R e q M 1

- 7. Three-way valve position 60; a d q ) : A- ,, d

. . , General housekeeyingfdebris amuhd Collection Tank ahd ! ~ o ~ k t i o n ~tmcture is 1.cgptable? I

8. Pressure gauge reading: k, 3 psig 9. Flow meter reading: / ffd 3 ~2 pllons

A rn

1 1. ~ x ~ o s e d pipe insulation in acceptable condition? I I

I

* 12. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

Collection Structure?

1 13. Number of spent carbon drums in building. 14. Number of virgin carbon drums in building.

I I Action

15. General hausekeeping/debris around Treatment Building is acceptable?

16. Building structure (root doors, paint) in acceptable d t i o n ?


18. ' First aid kit, emergency eye wash, tke exhguhher in acceptable condition?



21. Pressure switches/actuators fbnctional? d nl 22. Automatic dialedphone Line functional? d my Comments Item #

T+C CONTRACTING, INC. 6301 PENDLETON ROAD - PO. BOX 72398 LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY 40272-0398

Mr. James Forney Waste Management Inc. 17250 Plewburgh Rd., Suite #I00 Livonia, MI. 481 52

RE: Tri-City Disposal Site, Operation\Maintenance Report (588).

Mr. Fomey;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. '-I> ..

- .+ Cox Spring was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #I was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring # l . Samples werejaken from Klapper Spring, spring and stream were running. Security fence had been constructed around Klapper Spring, samples will now be taken approximately 50' down stream outside the perimeter of the fenced area. Photos taken of area and sent to Carl Shaw, RUST E&l. All samples sent for analygs. END OF REPORT


Thank you,

Scott A. glayes

Cc: Carl Shaw - RUST E&I

SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECTION LOG TRI-CITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE UNIT fil

~qte:-f. Time: //3d . operator: ,$A ,L%&,b

Ambient Temp. (OF) Weather Conditions: %i*nfl,, /

- 1. Three-way valve poi I A ~

2. Pressure gauge reading: / / I # < ~ S i g .

3. Flow meter reading: 31 gallons X1 a gpm -.

Action " No lsquual 4. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and

Spring House is acceptable?

5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? d 0.1 a- 1 6. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

Svrina House?

7. Thm-way valve positio or auxiliary): 8. Pressure gauge reading: Y- .b psig 9. Flow meter reading: /fifbw gallons

8'6 A gpm

b

,

: , Yes No

10. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection Strucm is acceptable? g / n

11. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? Ga CI

12. Signtficant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Collection Structure?

CI

Action Required

13. Number of spent carbon chums in building. 14. Number of virgin carbon dnnns in buildmg.

Action yes No ( R e q w

15. G e n d housekeepmgldebris around Treatment Building is 0 - acceptable?

16. Building structure (roof, doors, paint) in acceptable condition?


18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire exthgukher in acceptable condition?

19. H@ tracing and d m heaters in acceptable condition?


21. P ~ u r e switches/actuators functional? u'o.1 22. Automatic dialer/phone line functional? .

fhlnmm Item #

Mr. James Fomey Waste Management Inc. 17250 Newburgh Rd., Suite #A00 Livonia, MI. 48152


Mr. Forney;

On 6-25-98, the operations and maintenance requirements were performed at the Tri-Cdy disposal site according to the O&M plan.

Treatment building was found in goad condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring meter was replaced, system up and operating adequately. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #1 was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring #I.

. Samples werelaken from Mapper Spring, spring and stream were running. All samples sent for analysis. END OF REPORT


Thank you,

Scott A Hayes \

Cc: Carl Shaw RUST E&l 1

. .. S Y d OPERATION AND INSPECITON LOG

. . TRI-Cl'I'Y INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SlTE -

OPERABLE UNIT #1

e n Operator:

~rnbient Temp. (OF) 74- Westhet Conditions:

1. b w a y valve positio

2. Presmre gauge reading: -

3. Flow meter reading:

4. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable?

5. Exposed pipe msulation in acceptable condition? n 6. Significant accumuiation of solids in Collection Tank or

Spring House? dh

p o s i t i o n or a : ,, 8. Pressure gauge reading: #k*b p i g

9. Flow meter reading: I ~ 6 0 4 ~ gallons T. b epm

, Yes No

10. General housekeepinddebqs around Collection Tank and

I Collection Stnrcnue is acceptable? d 11. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? d

Action Required


-.

13. Number of spent carbon d m in building. 14. Number of virgin carbon dnrms in building.

Action

15. G e n d houseke!eping/debris amlllld Treatment - - acceptable? 16. Building structure (mft doors, paint) in acceptable

condition? 17. Any lealcing pipes, fittings, valves, equipment?

18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire extugusher in acceptable condition?




22. Automatic dialedphone line hctionai?

Item #

. . .

&STEM OPERATION AND INSPECITON LOG TRI-CITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE UNIT #1

Ambient T e q . (OF) 8 d Weather Conditions: d/!hd I /

A

1. Three-way valve positi

2. Presswe gauge reading: 3. Flow meter reading:

Yes Ni 1 &% 4. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and

Spring House is acceptable? d U- U- ,"


6. Significant accumuiation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House?

\

position 6 or auxiliary): II A U M ~

8. Pressure gauge reading: -sig 9. Flow meter reading: I TBI4& gallons x O L ) gpm

Action yes No 1 muired 1,


10. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable?

12. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Collection S t r u m ?

' 13. Number of spent carbon dnmu in building.

14. Numkr of virgin carbon drums in building

Yes No

Is. Generai housekeepmgldebris around Treatment Buiiding is @ . acceptable?

/

16. Building strutme (root doors, paint) in acceptable condition?


18. First aid lrif emergency eye wash, lire extinguisher in acceptable condition?

d u-: 19. Heat tracing and d m heaters in acceptable condition? d / 0- 20. Level sensors functional?


22. Automatic diaierlphone line functional? d U- Item #

Ation Required -

::


OPERABLE UNIT #1

1. Three-way valve p o s i t i o e r auxiliary): 2. Pressure gauge reading: 3. Flow meter reading:

4. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable?



10. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable?

1 1. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition?



14. Number of virgin. carbon drums in building.

15. General housekeepingldebris around Treatment Building is


acceptable condition?



. .

*+ - a SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECI?ON LOG

.+ . TRI-CITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE ' OPERABLE UNIT #1

~ate :yg? qF . Ti: lzou

1 Ambient Temp. ("F) di C> Weather Conditions: b n r r

A

. . 1. Three-way valve positio (

2. Pressure gauge reading: f@i%e53: ** I sit3 . .

3. Flow meter reading: z 3 g33'Y g d o m m --


"

, .' 4. ' General housekeepmgldebris around Collection Tank and . - ,: S ~ M ~ House is acceptable? . . u - 0. . .

5. pipe insulation in acceptable condition? u a: 6. Sipficant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or 11 ' ' So&. House?

7. Three-way valve positio or auxiliary): WAZKV

8. Pressure gauge reading: 4 . b psig 9. Flow meter reading: 8) 87 171 gallons

9 . 0 p m - Action

Yes No I Required . .

10. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable? r d ~

12. Significant accumulation of soiids in Collection Tank or Collection Structure?

•

1 1. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? do

I Treatment -. 13. Number of spent carbon drums in building. 14. Number of virgin carbon drums in building.

Action

15. Generai housekccpingldebris around Treatment Building is accqtable?

16. Budding structure (rooE, doors, paint) in acceptable condition?

17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves, .quipmwt?

18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire exhgukher in acceptable condition?



2 1. Pressure switchedactuators functional?

22. Automatic dialer/phone line functional?

d o - I 0:

Comments

'""I"

Mr. James Fomey Waste Management Inc. 17250 Mewburgh Rd., Suite #I 00 Livonia, MI. 481 52


Mr. Fomey;

On 10-29-98, the operations and maintenance requirements w r e performed at the Tri-City disposal site according to the O W plan.

Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system up and operating in auxiliary. High psi readings for both normal and auxiliary positions. Apparent restriction in line suspect the 3-way valve. Will begin repairs ASAP. Unnamed Spring #1 was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge parts of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring # l . Samples were not taken from Klapper Spring, spring and stream were not running. Security fence around Klapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. END OF REPORT

Please dl should you have any questions regarding this or any other maintenance report.

Thank vou.

Cc: Carl Shaw - RUST €81

" SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECI'ION LOG TRI-CITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE UNIT #1

I

~ a . t e 4 d ~ z Y T i e : * ~~~ Ambient Temp. (OF) 7 r Weather Conditions: % h h h v ~

I

2. Presm gauge reading: 3. Flow meter reading:

Yes - No I Required *&On

4. General housekeepmgldebris around Collection Tank and . Spring House is acceptable? d U- a- 5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition?

6. SiMcant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House?

Z G i ~ - - i r auxiliary): n/n+nd 8. Pressure gauge reading: y p a 9. Flow meter readmg: allons

m

Action \ . Yes No I Required

10. General housekeepinddebris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable? I d a


12. Sigdicant acmmulation of solids in Collection Tank or Collection Stnrctrrre'?

-- 13. Number of spent car&m drums in building. 2, 14. Nlamber.of .virgin carbon drums ia building. 2

Action

IS. Generai housekeeping/debris around Treatment Building is @ - [rl acceptable? -+ 16. Building stnrcftrre (roo& doors, paint) in acceptable

condition? 17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves, equipment?





22. Automatic diaIer/phone line hctionai?

or.

T C CONTRACTING

SYSTEM OPERATION AND MSPECTXON LOG TRI4XlY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE -

- 1. Tkrcz+way valve position n d .

b s i g 3- low mera reading: -dons

l p m -.

Action

4. Generat housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceprable? d o - 0.

5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? a ' u - a- 6. Sig&cant accumulation of solids in Colldon Tank or

Spring House?

h

8. Pressure gauge reading: Ce Ob' P&

I 9, Flow mew reading:

Action

10. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable? [7

1 1. Exposed pipe insulation in asceptable condition?

I 12. Signifim a c d o n of solids in Collection Taak or Collection S-?

'I .- /. -\

14- Elumber of virgin carbon dnnns in btlilding.

15. General housekeqngldebris around T- Building is

16. Building strumre (roof, doors, paint) in acceptabIe

17. Any leaking pipes, Mngs, valves. equipment?

18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, 6re in acceptable rJlndin'an7

19. Heat wcing and drum hearers in acceptable condition?

20. Level sensors fuactional?

21. Pranae switches/- functional?

22. Automatic dialedphone line functional?

SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECITON LOG TRI-ClTY MDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE UKJT #1

. .

Date: /- // - 9 7 . Time:~Z:d8 c+-w Ambient Temp. ("q 35 Weather Conditions: -

I Cax- I. ~brrs-any valve p o & o n e r iwxiky): h ~ w d . 2. Pressure gauge reading: /S 3. ~l&mebarmdhg: _ n a l l o n s a-

Action

4. Oeneral houxkceping/debris around Collection Tank and Spring House is &le? ' d U- U-

I 5. Ekposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition?

6. Sigdicant achrmulation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House?

J' 4- 7. Three-way valve psitio or a-): l7-d

: 8 . Pressure gauge rradiag: a g g 9. FIow meter reading: gallons

7. d _gpm

Action Yes No Req-d

I 10. Genaal howkccping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection S t i u x m is acceptable? d n

I 11 . Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition?

12. Signific81t of solids in Collecdm Tank or

..- #

14- N u m b of virgin carbon dnrms in buikhg.

IS. G d housekeepingldebcis around Treatment Building is

17. Any leaking pipes, f i m valves, e q u i p x t ?

18. F i m a i d l & e m a g e n c y e y e ~ f i r e ~ e r i n accqtsb1e condition?

19. Hart tming and drum heakm in acceptable condition?

20- Level sensors hctional?

21. Pressme switehedactualon funetiod?

-

Mr. James Fomey Waste Management Inc. 17250 Newburgh Rd., Suite #I00 Livonia, MI. 48152

RE: Td-City Disposal Site, Operation\Maintenance Report (1-99).

Mr. Fomey;

On 2-1 -99, the operations and maintenance requirements \Mere performed at the Tri-City disposal site according to the O&M plan.

Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed. Electrical problem still remains with actuator, have contacted Chandler Electric for on-site diagnostic. Unnamed Spring #1 was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Noticed erratic tank level readings, possible problem with pressure sensor in pump, will monitor. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring #I. Samples were laken from Klapper Spring, spring and stream were running. Security fence around Klapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. END OF REPORT


Thank you,

Scott A. ~ a f e s



OPERABLE UNIT #1

Date: Z-\ - 75 , Time: 3 : d 3

Ambient Temp. (OO 9 D Weather Conditions: rvf'-\\ I

or a q ) : 1. Tlme-way valve position p L 4 d . J .

2. Pressure gauge reading: 15 P% 3. Flow meter reading: 't3 %/as gallons

h g m -.

Yes No Action 11

Required

4. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable? d a-

5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? d n. 6. Signdicant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

Spring House?

_....

p o s i t i o n -. a : i- m m d 8. Pressure gauge reading: (d-'i


Action 1 R,-d 1, 10. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and

Collection Strucnxe is acceptable? d o 1 1 . Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition?

12. SiNcant accumuiation of solids in Collectioa Tank or Collection Structure?

. _.--.'


15. General housekeepmgldebris around Treatment Building is

16. Building structure (roof, doors, paint) in acceptable


18. First aid kif emergency eye wash, fire extinguisher in acceptable condition?



21. Pressure switches/actuators functional?

Mr. James Fomey Waste Management Inc. 17250 Newburgh Rd., Suite # I 00 Livonia, MI. 48152

RE: Tri-City Disposal Site, OperationWlaintenance Report (02-99).

Mr. Fomey;

On 3,2,99 the operations and maintenance requirements were performed at the Tri-City disposal site according to the O&M plan.

Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system up and operating in auxiliary. High psi readings for both normal and auxiliary positions. Possible problem with 'Time Delay', have sent drawings to Chandler Electric for troubleshooting. Unnamed Spring #I was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring # l . Samples were taken from Klapper Spring, spring and stream were running. Security fence around Klapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. END OF REPORT


Thank you,

Scott A. Hayes



OPERABLE UNIT #1

Ambient Temp. ("F) Q Weather Conditions:

2. Pressure gauge reading: 3. FIow meter reading: urn -.

- -

4. General househeping/debris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable? d o -

5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? b 0

6. Signrficant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House? @&,

U.

0.

7. Three-wayvalveposition(o orauxlliary): F3 In. %bd 8. Pressure gauge reading: b, < psig

9. low meter reading: 168317 pallons 8 . 3 gpm

. Yes No

10. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable? D'o

1 1. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? d o

Action Required

0.

12. Sigdcant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or collection S tructurc?

-

. -

y -. +

, I

-

- -

4 - /I--

--

13. Number of spent carbon drums in building. a- 14. Number of virgin carbon drums in building. 2-

Yes No 15. General housekeepingldebris around Treatment Building is

acceptable? w n 16. Building structure (roof, doors, paint) in acceptable

condition? v n

, 17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves, equipment? n a ' 18. First aid kit emergency eye wash, dre cxtqmher in

acceptable condition? w 0--

19. Heat tracing and drum heaters in acceptable condition? m' 0- 20. Levei sensors functional? W U 2 1. Pressure switches/actuators fimcuonai? d o 22. Automatic dialer/phone line functional? d ' ~

Action Required

n-

n

U.

c!2Rmc& Item #

Mr. James Fomey Waste Management Inc. 17250 Newburg h Rd., Suite #I00 Livonia, MI. 48152

RE: Trl-City disposal Site, OperationWaintenance Report (3-99)

Mr. Forney;

On 4-1-99 the operations and maintenance requirements were performed at the Tri-City disposal site according to the O&M plan.

Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox spring system up and operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. (Please see attached report) Unnamed Spring #I was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring # l . Samples were taken from Klapper spring, 1 * sample from the spring, 2"d from normal testing area, and 3d from the stream intersection approx. 100 ft. downstream of the spring. Security fence around Klapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. END OF REPORT.


Thank you,

Scott A. Hayes Cc: Carl Shaw


OPERABLE UNIT #1

C Date: ?. / -5 7 , Time: ?: 6 b . operator: a h , n s

/ Ambient Temp. ("F),L Weather Conditions:

1. Three-way valve p ~ d t i ~ e or a d r y ) : nib d w

2. Pressure gauge mxhg: 3. Flow meter reading:

Action Yes No I Required

4. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable? U - El.

I 5. Exposed pipe W a t i o n in acceptable condition?

A 6. Sipiicant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House?

11 7. --w& valve p o o i t i o l y ( ~ r auxiliary): h ~ . - / e 8. Pressure gauge reading: w


b 1 C psig

b i gR33k gallons

a m

Action Yes No 1 Required


10. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable? wcl

12. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

•

A - - -L.-.r - ,- -"

14. N& of virgin carbon drums in building. 7

15. General housekeeping/debris around Treatment Building is

16. Building strucaae (roo& doors, paint) in acceptable


18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire extingwher in acceptable condition?



21. Pressure switches/actuators functional?


RE: Tri-City disposal Site, Operation\Maintenance Report (4-99)

Mr. Forney;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox spring system up and operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #1 was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring # I . Samples were taken from Klapper Spring, downstream of the security fence. Security fence around Klapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. END OF REPORT.


Thank you,


SYSTEM OPERATION AND I N S P E ~ ~ O N LOG TRI-Cm INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE UNIT #1

Ambient Temp. (OF) ii $ Weather Conditions: c*J,,,d i-i k % L h.

1. Three-way valve positio

2. Pressure gauge reading:

3. low meter reading:


E'' m-

5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? K'.' 6. Significant accumuIation of solids in Collection Tank or

spring House? W'O

.

CI

p o s i t i o 4 or aui~iary): h /~,m ;Q. P' 8. Pressure gauge reading: 6L psig 9. Flow meter reading: 1RBSb f qailons

7, c, -gm

. Yes No

1 0. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection Shucture is acceptable? d a

1 1. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? 8 / [ 7

Action Required

11.

12. Sipiiicant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Collection Stmcture?

. .. . - .- --'- .. ,,

..- /--

. . . 1 13. Number of spent carbon drums in buildmg. 14. Number of virgin carbon drums in building.



18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, iire extinguisher in acceptable condition?

19. Heat tracing and dnnn heaters in acceptable condition?

20. Level sensors functionai? W"U~

d o 2 1 . Pressure switches/actuators functional?

22. Automatic diaier/phone line functionai? U .

U . :

-.

Comrments Item #

- -

Mr. James Fomey Waste Management Inc. 1 7250 Newburgh Rd., Suite #I00 Livonia, MI. 481 52


Mr: Forney;

On 6-3-99 the operations and maintenance requirements were perfonned at the Tri-City disposal site according to the O&M plan.

Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox spring system up and operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #1 was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge parts of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring #l. Samples were taken from Klapper Spring, downstream of the security fence. Security fence around Klapper Spring in goad condition. All samples sent for analysis. END OF REPORT.


Thank you,



OPERABLE UNIT #1

3 -."o Datei'r- I 1 7 , rme:/'d ,.LJD

Ambient Temp. ('0 f.$ Weather Conditions: C/&/ /

1. Threeway valve positio A Tflm d 2. Pressure gauge reading: y.c> P@ 3. low meter reading: d o n s

Action Yes No / Required

4. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Spring House is accqtable?

Q7. u 0.


6. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Soring House?

I --

I

7. Three-way valve positi E n z ~ l d

8. Pressure gauge reading: (0 . 0 psig

9. FIOW meter reading: 6C' gallons F?, a gpm


# 11. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? d o 1 o

1 0. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable? d ' o

Y 12. Signdicant accumdation of solids in Collection Tank or Collection Structure?

-

> ..

I -

: j C

! :

: -

- -

& -

--.*. .-. - '

.- - -

13. Number of spent carbon drums in building. 14. Number of virgin carbon drums in building. 3 I..

Yes No

15. General housekeeping/debris around Treatment Building is acceptable?

16. Buikdmg structure (roo% doors, paint) in acceptable condition?

-+

: 17. Any Iealring pipes, fittings, valves, equipment? 0, d 18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fke extinguisher in

acceptable condition? do:

'19. Heat tracing and drum heaers in acceptable condition? '

20. Level sensors funcrionai? dh-. 2 1. Pressure switches/actuators functionai? d a . 22. Automatic diaierlphone line functional?, d m -

Action Required

n-

U- o 0. U.

Camments Item #


RE: Tri-Clty disposal Site, Operation\Maintenance Report (6-99)

Mr. Forney;

On 6-29-99 the operations and maintenance requirements were performed at the Tri-City disposal site according to the 08M plan.

Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox spring system up and operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #I was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring #I. Samples taken from Klapper Spring. Samples taken downstream of the security fence. Security fence around Klapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. END OF REPORT.


Thank you,

Scott A Hayes Cc: Carl Shaw

SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECI'ION LOG TRI-CITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE

OPERABLE UNIT #1

11 1. Threeway valve position @I&$ or auxiliary): p j-~,,,~;q 2 1;

7- . " J a Ambient Temp. (OF) 11 :J Weather Conditions: * c,!c~:,

n

w 2. Pressure gauge reading: 3. Flow meter reading:

-

Action Yes No 1 R q u x d

4. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable? 4." a''

6. Signrflcant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or S~rine House?

d ,la I

a- 5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? m 17

7. Three-way valve position or auxiliary): ~ ! ! i p % a). 8. Pressure gauge reading: LC psig

9. Flow meter reding: !' YJ uLL) gallons Y- >gm

U'

Yes No

11. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? n 1 a. I

Action Required

10. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable?

12. Sigdicant m u l a t i o n of solids in Collection Tank or cnllection ~tntcture? ~ " o U.

13. Number of spent carbon drums in buildmg. 3 (1 14. Number of virgin carbon drums in building. i.

Action

15. General housekeephgidebris around Treatment Building is acceptable?

I 16. Building structure (roofS doors, paint) in acceptable condition?

8/'a.- 17. Any leaking pipes, fillings, valves, equipment? 0 ' a' 0 . 18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire extinguisher in

acceptable condition? 19. Heat tracing and d m heaters in acceptable condition? a 0 . 1 20. Level sensors functional?

21. Pressure switches/acruators functional? 8'171 22. Automatic dialer/phone line functional? ~ ~ ' 1 7 . 1

I

Comwents Item #



Mr. Forney;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox spring system up and operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #1 was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring #1 Samples were not taken downstream of the security fence, spring not running. Security fence around Klapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. END OF REPORT.


Thank you,



OPERABLE UNIT #1

1. -way valve position 2. Pressure gauge reading:

3. Flow meter-:

4. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable? ' I3

5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? a- 6. Sigdicant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

Spring House? dim

0 -

8. Pressure gauge reading: b psig 9. Flow meter reading: / TBLj37 gallons

X Q b qpm

. Yes No

10. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable? d o

1 1 . Fxposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? 0

Action Required

0

12. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

13. Numk of spent carbon dnnns in buildmg. 14. Number of virgin wbon drums in building.

-- -- - . -


18. First aid kif emergency eye wash, lire exbqukher in acceptable condition?

20. Level sensors firnctional?

2 1. Pressure switches/actmtors functional?


SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECTION LOG TRI-CITY INDUSTRLAL DISPOSAL SITE

OPERABLE UNIT #1

Ambient Temp. (OF) m'' Weather Conditions: S w ~ r &/w

1. h - w a y valve position auxiliary):

2. Pressure gauge reading: -Mig






I 1. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition?

3. Number of spent carbon drums in building. 14. Number of virgin.carbon dnuns in building.




19. Heat tracing and drum 'heaters in acceptable condition? 611 20. Level sensors functional? El 17 2 1. Pressure switches/actuators functional? [81

22. Automatic dialedphone line functional? E l

.

El fl

Comments Item #

. .

. .

, .

Mr. ~ a m e s Forney Waste Management Inc. 17250 Newburgh Rd., Suite #lo0 Livonia, MI. 48152


Mr. Forney;

On 9-29-99 the operations and maintenance requirements were performed at the Tri-Crty disposal site according to the O&M plan.

Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox spring system up and operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #1 was found to be operating adequately, all system checks i

performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring # I Samples were not taken downstream of the security fence, spring not running. Secunty fence around Klapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis.

END OF REPORT.


. - .. - --. - - .-.. . Thank you,

Scott A. Hayes u

Cc: Carl Shaw


OPERABLE UNIT #1

~ a t e : $ - j ~ " f 7 , T i e : 3;@ Operator: S&/LI Ambient Temp. (OF) 7 6 Weather Conditions: d hrcq

A

I. h - w a y valve position a ) : k * d 2. Pressure gauge reading: 7. psig

3. low meter teading: ~allons gpm - -


Yes No Action

Required

6. Sigdicant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House?

5 . Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condiuon? d,

7. Three-way valve positio fl/& 8. Pressure gauge reading: psig




1 0. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable? d n


A ..- - , .... ..-

. .



Action . ,

-Yes ' ' No Required


d. a1 o- f l

16. Buiiding structure (roof, doors, paint) in acceptable condition?



19. Heat tracing and d m hearers in acceptable condition? d o - I 20. Level sensors functional?

2 1. Pressure switches/acruators functional?

22. Automatic dialedphone line functional? --

Comwents Item #

Mr. James Forney Waste Management Inc. 17250 Newburgh Rd., Suite #I 00 Livbnia, MI. 481 52

.RE: Tri-City disposal Site, Operation\Maintenance Report (10-99)

Mr. Forney;

On 11-1 0-99 the operations and maintenance requirements were performed at the Tri-City disposal site according to the O&M plan.

Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox spring system up and operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #1 was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring #1 Samples were not taken downstream of the security fence, spring not running. Security fence around Klapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis.

END OF REPORT.


Thank you,

Scott A. ~ a y & Cc: Carl Shaw


OPERABLE UNIT #1

Ambient Temp. ('F) 71) Weather Conditions:

a

1. Thret-way valve positio

2. Pressure gauge reading: 8.0 psi13 . 235706 3. Flow. meter reading: gallons A m -.

Action yes No / muinxj


il 5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? d n / a 6. Sigulicant accumulation of soiids in Collection.Tank or

Spring House?

7. Three-way valve position or auxiliary): 8. Pressure gauge reading: S* 6 psig

9. Flow meter reading: 1%s14r gallons 3, o gpm

Action Yes N o 1 ReqlYTrd

10. General houst3keeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable? d o

1 1 . Exposed pipe insuiation in acceptabie condition?

12. Simcant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Collection S tiwtme?

13. Number of spent carbon drums in building. & - 0 - . .



18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire exmguisher in acceptable condition?

19. Heat, tracing and dnan heaters in acceptable condition?

. . . Yes No 1 5. General housekeepingdebris around Treafment Building is

acceptable? d a'-

16. Building stmctme (roof, doors, paint) in acceptable condition?

a .


Y

Action Required

o- 17,


22. Automatic dialerfphone line functional?

. . 1 4

Item # 1"""""

Mr. James Forney Waste Management Inc. 17250 Newburgh Rd., Suite # I 00 Livonia, MI. 48152

RE: Tri-City disposal Site, Operation\Maintenance Report (I 1-99)

Mr. Forney;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox spring system up and operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #I was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring #I Samples were not taken downstream of the security fence, spring not running. Security fence around Klapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis.

END OF REPORT.


Thank you,

Scott A. Hayes ' Cc: Carl Shaw


OPERABLE UNIT #1

Date: /3-/-97 .

1 Ambient Temp (-9 Weather Conditions: 7151 L/I ~ r l I I 1

A

I . Three-way valve position no& or audliary): 6--. n rcm r*l/i .

2. Pressute gauge reading: 7 ~ s i g 3. Flow' meter reading: ~ 3 ? 7 1 $ gallons

l - j , 5- ~ p m -.




I 6. Signrficant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

Spring House?

7. Three-way valve positiorf$da or auxiliary): fl hK,.,,q ~4 L-/---

8. Pressure gauge reading: L s i g


Action ~r a (m-1

( I I . Exposed pipe innrlation in acceptable condition? d o 1

10. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection S t r u m is acceptable? W'O

12. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank-or . .

Collection Strucnae?

13. Number of spent carbar drums in building. 14. Number of virgin carbon drums in building.

Action . . . . . . . . . . . . - - . _ . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . .... - ........

15. General housekeepmgldebris around Treatment Building is acceptable?

16. Building s t r u m (roof) doors, paint) in acceptable . . . . . . .... . . condition? -

. . . .

17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves; equipment? .

18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire extmguher in acceptable condition?



2 1. Pressure switchdactuators functional?


Item #

Mr. James Forney Waste Management Inc. 19200 W. 8 Mile Rd. Southfield, MI. 48075


Mr. Forney;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox spring system up and operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #1 was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring #1 Samples were taken downstream of the security fence. Samples were taken from Klapper Spring. Security fence around Klapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis.

END OF REPORT.


Thank you,


SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECIlON LOG TRI-ClTY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE UNIT #1

Ambient Temp. (OF) Weather Conditions: f a $ , , 1

/

I. Three-way valve positio ?d-t/ tyl&

2. Pressure gauge reading: % P i g . ,

3 7y -n 3. Flow meter reading: -dons r- -.

Action Yes No / Pquua

4. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable? u'. U -

W 5 . Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition?

6. Sigdcan t accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House? "@Po

... . . 11 7. --way valve position,(Ghai or auxiliary): ' yw&.,,/S. ' " . . J 11 8. Pressm gauge reading: . psig

9. Flow meter reading: ig- 's: / gallons 'd : f3 k rn

Action YU No 1 Required

I 10. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable? d o / •


12. Simcant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

13. Number of spent carbon d m in building.. 14. Number of virgin carbon drums in budding.

Action . - . . .


16. Building structure (roo& doors, paint) in acceptable condition?


18. First aid kif emergency eye wash, fire ex-hguher in acceptabie condition?

19. He* tracing and drum heaters in acceptable condition? ' 0. I 20. Level sensors functional?

2 1. Pressure switches/actuatnrs functional?


11 Item #


RE: Tri-City dispo~al Site, Operation\Maintenance Report (0100)

Mr. Forney;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox spring system up and operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamea Spring #I was found to be operating adequately, all system checks

;>.- ,

- . . . . < peifo.h.&d .- and no deficiencies found. i 'samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and

Unnamed Spring #1 Samples were taken downstream of the security fence. Security fence around Klapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis.

END OF REPORT.


Thank you,

'( SYSTEM OPERATION AND 1NSPECnON LOG TRI-cITY ~ u ~ T R I A L DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE UNIT #I

Ambient Temp. ("F) 3-2 Weather Conditions: d&

- I. Tluewvay valve position 0 refi d 2. Pressure g,auge reading: 7 3. FIow' meter reading:

u

Action Yes No Requred

4. General howekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable? 3- &Y a'. a-

11 S. Exposed pipe M a t i o n in acceptable condition?

6. Signijicant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Stninn House?

7. Three-way valve position or auxiliary): ~&rmd

8. Pressure gauge reading: h. P&

9. Flow meter reading: } $fL,vb gallons 53 gpm

v

Action

12. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Callection Stmctwc?

. Yes No

10. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection S b u c t m is acceptable? d o

1 1 . Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? d u

Required

O

a.

13. Number of spent carbon dnnns in building.

14. Number of virgin carbon dnnns in building.

Action

15. General houselqingldebris around Treatment Building is acceptabie?



18. First aid kif emergency eye wash, fire extinguher in acceptable condition?

19. H d , tracing and d m heaters in acceptable condition?

20. Level sensors functional?.

2 1. Pressure switches/acmators funcrional?

22. Automatic dialerlphone line functional?

Comnaents Item #



Mr. Fomey;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox spring system up and operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #I was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring #1 Samples were taken downstream of the secunty fence. Samples were taken from the spring. Security fence around Klapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis.

END OF REPORT.



SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECTION LOG TRI-ClTY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE UNIT #1

Date: -/-//-dd , Tm: 3-0 OpeTam s. &!6f I Ambient Temp. (OF) 5-5 Weather Conditions: .I L n m t / I 1. ~~uee-way valve position ( 6-m: J Y L ~ ~

2. Pressure gaugereading:

3. Flow' meter reading:

1 .&on 1 Yes No Required


5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? W U I

6. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Suing House?

7. Three-way valve position or a ) : M!IYrmd

8. Pressure gauge reading: 7 . D psig


I .

x Yes No

10. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and Collection Strucnxe is acceptable?

11. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? €3'

12. Si@cant accumulaiion of soiids in Collection Tank or Collection smctwe? d o

Action Required

El

0.

a. k -

13. Number of spent carbon drums in building. , Ld 14. Number of virgin carbon drums in building. -0 -


15. G e d housekeeping/debris around Treatment Building is acceptable?



.18. First aid kif emergency eye wash, fire extinguisher in accepable condition?

19. He* tracing and dnnn heaters in.acceptable condition?



22. Automatic diaiedphone line functional?

Item # I-

Mr. James Fomey Waste Management Inc. 19200 W. 8 Mile Rd. Southfield, MI. 48075

RE: Tri-City disposal Site, OperationWlaintenance Report (04-00)

Mr. Forney;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox spring system up and operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #1 was found to be operating, adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring #1 Samples were taken downstream of the security fence. security fence around Klapper Spring in good wndition. All samples sent for analysis.

END OF REPORT.


Thank you,

Cc: Carl Shaw

- SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECTXON LOG

TRI-ClTY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE OPERABLE UNIT #1



5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? d m 6. S i m c a n t accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

Spring House? / n

7. Three-way valve position - 6 r auxiliary): 37- d 8. Pressure gauge reading: & d L ) psig

9. FIOW meter reading: /86CP03 p ~ o n s .a gpm

.. Yes No

10. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable? 8/0

Action Required

1 1 . Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? n 12. S i @ W accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

Colldon Structure?

- 13. Number of spent carbon drums in building. 14. Number of virgin carbon drums in building. -04

Action Yes , No /

15. General hous&eeping/debris around Treabnent Buildlag is / 0-. acceptable? /

16. Building structure (mot doors, paint) in acceptable condition?

17. Any lealung pipes, fittings, valves, equipment? \

18. First aid kif emergency eye wash, 6re exhguisher in acceptable condition?

19. He* e i n g and dnnn heaters in acceptable condition? d 0- 20. Level sensors functional?


22. Automatic diaIer/phone line functional?

Item # 0-


RE: Tri-City disposal Site, OperationWlaintenance Report (0580)

Mr. Forney;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. 'Cox spring system up and operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #I was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring #I. Samples were taken at Klapper Spring. Samples were taken downstream of the security fence. Security fence around Klapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis.

END OF REPORT.


Thank you,


SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPEcT'ION LOG TRI-CITY INDUSTRJAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE UNIT #1

Ambient Temp. (OF) f 5 Weather Conditions: ,74mmr I I

zway d v e p o d i o e r a-1: m d - 2. Pressure gauge reading: ~ s i g 3. Flow'meter reading: L~ZB'~"? gallon!

%'. u gpm -'

I Action Yes No Reauire

4. General housekeepmg/debris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable?

I . 5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition?

6. Sigruficant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House?

- -

--

position<- a d ~ ) : ex O W ~

8. Pressure gauge reading: -sig

9. Flow meter reading: --mbne- gallons B m

1 0. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection Stmcture is acceptable? d o

I 1 I . Exposed p i p iosuQtion in acceptable condition?

I 12. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Clnllection Structure?

./: ,.- . . - 1

- 13. Number of spent carbon drums in building. 14. Number of virgin carbon drums in building.

15. General housekeeping/debris around Treatment Building is acceptabie?

. II 16. Building structure (roo% doors, paint) in acceptable condition?

1 17. Any lealdng pipes, fittings, valves, equipment?

18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, iire exhgmher in acceptable condition?

1) 19. Heat tracing and drum heaters in acceptable condition?

Y 20. Level sensors functional?

) 21. Pressure ~WitdresiacNatOf~ functional?

11 22. Automatic dialalphone line functional?

cQnumis Item #

- -



Mr. Forney;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox spring system up and operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #I was found to be operating adequately, all system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring #I . Samples were taken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring. Security fence around Klapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis.

END OF REPORT.


Thank vou,


SYSTEM OPERATION AND I N S P E a O N LOG . TRI-CITy INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE .

OPERABLE UNIT #1



4. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and d a Spring House is acceptable?

5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? cbn 6. Sigdicant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

Spring House? k-fn

a.

7. Three-way valve position 6 or auxiliary):

8. Pressure gauge reading: .a

9. Flow meter reading: / Liim n k , b

. Yes No

10. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptabie? P o

1 1. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? d n

Action Required

12. Simcant a c c u m ~ o n of solids in Collection Tank or Collection Stnrcture?

13. Nmber of spent &n d m in building. 14. Number of virgin carbon drums in building.

15. General housekeeping/debris around Treaunent Building is acceptable?

Action

-

16. Building structure (roo& doors, paint) in acceptable condition?

d n.- 17. A.uy leaking pipes, fittings, valves, equipment? . 18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire extmguder in

acceptable condition? 19. Heat tracing and drum heaters in acceptable condition?




X A r DL.& N h

Item # $- ~h 4o#mzc/ /M< Mfl- 5-

A/ -& , 2



Mr. Forney;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox spring system was found down and not operating, all system checks performed by hand and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #I was found to be down and not operating, all system checks performed by hand and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring and Unnamed Spring #l. Samples were not taken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring, spring not running. . -.-

Security fence around Klapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis.

END OF REPORT.

Please call should you have any questions regarding this or any other maintenance report. I

Thank you,


SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECITON LOG TRI-cITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE UNIT #1

( Date: reP'oo . rime:a: lo Operator: 5 Me , . .

/ Ambient Temp. (OF) 7 3 Weather Conditions: d&t b. , &-

- 1 . Three-way valve position


m -

Action Y. No I Rq-


5 . Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition?

6. Signrficant accumuiation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House?

7. Three-way valve position or auxiliary): 8. Pressure gauge reading: h. psig 9. Flow meter reading: / n&?a gallons

8 gpm



1 1 . Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? / n o

12. Significant accumdation of solids in Collection Tank or Collection Structure?

- 13. Number of spent carbon drums in building. 14. Number of virgin carbon drums in building.

Action Yes,/ No R e q M

1 5 General housekeepinjdebns around Treatment Building is a: / - acceptable? / 16. Building s t r u m (roof; doors, paint) in acceptable

condition? d R.-L • 17. Any leaking pipes, fitiings, valves, equipment?

18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire extingusher in acceptable condition?

19. Heat tmchg and drum heaters in acceptable condition?


2 1. Pressure switches'actuators functional?


cQmmas Item #

SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECIlON LOG TRI-CITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE UNIT #1

Dak: q//?/m Time: //OD 0-r: Ca c/ &U w

Ambient Temp. (OF) BO Weather Conditions: PC hmf 2

A

I. Three-way vdve position (normal or auxiliary): dbrm4 / 2. Pressure gauge reading: 8 psi13 3. Flow meter midug: 238q623 d o n s . a k m -.

Action Yes NO / Requint

4. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable? a 0.


6. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Soring House?

7. Thne-way valve position (normal or auxiliary): / J ~ ~ m a (

8. Pressure gauge reading: 6 psig 9. Flow meter reading: 188722 gallons

a m

Action Yes NO / Required



12. Sigdcant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

1 13. Number of spent carbon d m in building. , 14. Number of virgin carbon drums in building.

Yes No Action I

15. General housekeeping/debris around Treatment Building is [7 . acceptable?


: 0.-

17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves, equipment? 0. 18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire exthgukher in

acceptable condition? 19. Heat, tracing and drum heaters in acceptable condition?

20. Level sensors functional? a: 2 1. Pressure switches/actuators functional? [El' a. 22; Automatic diaierlphone Iine fbctionai? El m. Comments Item # I



Mr. Forney;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox spring system was found down and not operating, all system checks performed by hand and no deficiencies found. Tank was emptied during maintenance process. Spring is not running. Unnamed Spring #I was found to be down and not operating, all system checks performed by hand and no deficiencies found. Tank was emptied during maintenance process. Spring is not running Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring. Samples were not taken-downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring, spring not running. Security fence around Klapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis.

END OF REPORT.


Thank you, / 1

Scott A. ~ a ~ e s "

Cad;

Update on situation at Tri-City Disposal Site #1

9-8-00 - On site with Chandler Electric to trouble shoot electrical system. Informed by EPG to remove and return level meter from Unnamed Spring and the barrier that is located in the electrical panel.

' 9-16-00 - On site and replaced repaired meter and barrier from EPG. Noticed irregular level readings on both systems. Replaced transducer in Cox's Spring and inspected Unnamed Spring. This did not improve the level meter readings. Pumped the holding tanks and cleaned out. Note that the springs are not running.

9-20-00 - On site for drum removal and replacement. Noticed incorrect level meter readings and placed a call to EPG to trouble shoot. Asked to return with additional tools and testing equipment.

9-26-00 - On site for routine testing, Unnamed Spring tank empty spring not running, Cox's Spring had enough to take samples but spring not running. Called EPG to trouble shoot level meter readings, followed instructions but situation did not improve. Asked by EPG to return with additional testing materials.

Please call should you have any questions.

Scott


OPERABLE UNIT #1

Ambient Temp. (OF) ~e,? Weather Conditions:jLM -r 1 /

L .-.

A

=way vdve , o , o ~ . alJxihy): 2. Pressure gauge reading:

3. Flow meter reading: moons 3, 0 gpm -.

Action -

I. No / Required 1 :'

6. Sigdicant accumuiation of solids in Collection Tank or Sorine House?



7. Three-way valve position or auxiliary): 8. Pressure gauge reading: ~ s i g 9. Flow meter reading: /'b'1770 gallons

gpm

Action Yes NO Requi=d 1)

a-

U'


i.

1 1 . Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition?

12. Si@cant a c c u m ~ o n of solids in Collection Tank or Collection structure? U .

Y .

I 13. Number of spent carbon dtums in buiidmg. A I

14. Number of virgin carbon drums in building. p ... .. Action

15. General housekeepingldebris around Treatment Building is acceptable?

16. Building structure (rooE, doors, paint) in acceptable condition?

17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves, equipment? • a// 0 . 18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fk extingusher in

acceptable condition? 19. Heat tracing and d m heaters in acceptable condition?


2 1. Pressure switcfieslactuaton functional?


Item # r&+p m f &nr).vl

/ d d /M 9-23.bD


RE: Tri-City disposal Slte, Operation\Maintenance Report (10-00)

Mr. Forney;

On 11 -07-00 the operations and maintenance requirements were performed at the Tri-City disposal site according to the O&M plan.

Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox spring system was found down and not operating, all system checks performed by hand and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #I was found to be down and not operating, all system checks performed by hand and no deficiencies found. Tank was emptied during maintenance process. Spring is not running. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring. Samples were not taken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring, spring not running. ,, Security fence around Klapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. END OF REPORT.


Thank you,


SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECTION LOG TRI-Cl'IY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE

OPERABLE UMT #I

~ w ~ / ' - ? - d O .~uoc::.;S..?~ ~paatoc<-

Ambient Temp. (OF) 7 W& Conditions: cy fi, MM t

a

1. Three-way valve position r awnhy): ntmd. 2. Pressure gauge reading: Y , O - ~ s i g 3. Flow meter reading: gallons

F.c) - gpm -.

Action

4. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Spring Home is acceptable?

I 5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition?

6. Sigtuficant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House?

. -

7. Three-way valve position @r auxi l iq) : 8. Pressure gauge reading: D s i g 9. Flow meter reading:

gpm

Action Yes No I Required

10. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and Collection S t r u m is acceptable?

11 . Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? . .

12. Significant accumWon of solids in CoIlection Tank or

13. Number of spent carban drums in building. 14. Number of virgin carbon dnrms in building. .. I Action

Yes No Required

15. General howkeepingldebris around Treatment Building is 'T acceptable?

16. Building stnrcture (roof, doors, paint) in acceptable condition?


18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire extingmher in acceptable condition?



2 1. Pressure switches/actuators functional? 0.1 22. Automatic diaier/phone line functional?

-- -

Item #


RE: Tri-City disposal Site, Operatlon\Maintenance Report (1 1-00)

Mr. Forney;

On 11 -25-00 the operations and maintenance requirements were performed at the Tri-City disposal site according to the O&M plan.

Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox spring system was found down and not operating. Replaced transducer according to manufacturer's recommendation and' have determined that further electrical problems exists. Have made arrangements to troubleshoot system. All system checks performed by hand and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #I was found to be down and not operating. Replaced transducer according to manufacturer's recommendation, system up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. ' Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring. Samples were taken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring. Securii fence around Klapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis.

END 0F.REPORT.


Thank you,



OPERABLE UNIT #1

Ambient Temp. ('F) 43 Weather Conditions: I

=y d v e p o s i t i o n e o r a e ) :


Action -

Yes No / Required 1 4. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and



6. Simcant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring ~ o u s e ? CI

...

7. Three-way valve position AYI

8. Pressure gauge reading: psig 9. low meter reading: / f l 7 f Y gailons

A m

Action Ye No lkqluny.

10. General housekeepiugldebris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable?

1 1 . E.uposed pipe i n d o n in acceptable condition?

12. SignScant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Collection S-?

L -

"

13. Number of spent carbon drums in building. 14. Number of virgin &n drums in building. A ;t

Action

IS. General housekeepingfdebris around Treatment Building is acceptable?

16. Building structure (root doors, paint) in acceptable condition?

1 17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, vdv& equipment? dl u. ' 18. First aid La, emergency eye wash, iire extmgukher in acceptabie condition? d~:l u

19. Heat tracing and drum heaters in acceptable condition? d o - 1 0. 20. Level sensors functional?

21. Pressure switches/actuators hctional?

22. Automatic dialerlphone line functional?

Item #



Mr. Forney;


.Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox spring system was found down and not operating. All system checks performed by hand and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #1 was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring. Samples were not taken downstream of the security fence at Mapper Spring, spring not running. Security fence around Mapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning.

END OF REPORT.


Thank you,

Scott A. Hayes " Cc: Carl Shaw


OPERABLE UNIT #1

7 7 d I' ~ a t s : i - ~ / - d / . -rime: 3 O ~ C 3 /4~d/k,f

/

Ambient Temp. ( O F ) 37 weather Conditions: JL. fi r I/ 1

1. Three-way valve position @ or a*): 0 .

2. Pressure gauge reading: 71 ?A P& 3. Flow meter reading: 2 3 7 0 b d gallons

f. i' gpm --

Action Yes No / Rquked


5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? o a 6. Si&cant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

Spring House?

7. Three-way valve positio or auxiliary): 7 ma & 8. Pressure gauge reading: psig

9. Flow meter reading: / k f w - . gallons m a - gpm

1 1 . Exposed pipe hsdaiion in acceptable condition? , .

12. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Collection Stnrcane?.

' :

. Yes No

10. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and ' Collection Structure is acceptable? d

Action Required

1 13. Number of npmt carbon drums in building.

1 14. Number of virgin carbon dnrms in building.

Action

15. General housckeeping/debris around Treatment Building is acceptable?

16. Building stnutme (roof, doors, paint) in acceptable condition?


18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire cxtmgukher in acceptable condition?





Comments Item #


RE: Tri-City disposal Site, Operation\Maintenance Report (0101)

Mr. .Forney;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox spring system was found down and not operating. All system checks performed by hand and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #1 was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring. Samples were taken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring, spring not running. Security fence around Klapper Spring in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning.

END OF REPORT.


Than you, GU~? Scott A. Hayes Cc: Carl Shaw

SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPEmON LOG TRI-ClTY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE UNIT #1

Date: /-d C-d 1 . he:' d 5 ;eJ operator:

Ambient Temp. (OF) fd Weather Conditions: SLn m i /

&

1. 'Three-way mive positio h m ~ A 2. Pressure gauge reading: (2 ~ s i g 3. Flow meter reading: allom

A m -

Action Yes No ) Required

4. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable? & a - U-

5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? CI

6. Sigmficant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House?

~ d x , . , . l d

8. Presswe gauge reading: 7 . 6 psig

9. Flow meter reading: I c3&383 gallons 9. a gpm

Action ye NO 1 R~~ 1,

10. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection ~trucnrre is acceptable? d o

(.

1 1 . Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? . . I f 0 0 .

12. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Collection Smcane? -'

- 13. Number of spent carbon drums in building. A 14. Number of virgin carbon drums in building. A

Action

15. G d housekaping/debds around Treatment Building is acceptable?

16. Building stntchrre (roo& doors, paint) in acceptable condition?

17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves; equipment?

18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, h extqukher in acceptable condition?




22. Automatic dialedphone line functional? d m 1 Comments Item #

Mr. dames-Forney Waste Management Inc. 19200 W. 8 Mile.Rd. Southfield, MI. 48075

RE: Tri-City disposal Site, OperationWntenance Report (0241.)

Mr. .Formy;

On 03-01-01 the operations and maintenance requirements were performed at the Tri-City disposal site m r d i n g to the O&M plan.

Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #I was up and, running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring #l. Samples were taken downstream of the security fence at KlapEr Spiing, sprlng rUnirihg. Security fence around Klapper Spring was found in good condition. At1 samptes sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning.

END OF REPORT.


Thank you,

Scott A. ayes Cc: Carl Shaw

SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECIlON LOG TRI-ClTY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE UNIT #1

I Ambient Temp. ("F) 4r Weather Conditions: pq Lt! r (dl! I:

7. Three-way valve positi f l 6 1 ~ t v \ d

8. Pressure gauge reading: h e < psig

9. Flow meter reading: gallons -z gpm

a

=way d v e ,,on ear a-1: r-d 2. Pressure gauge reading:

3. Flow meter reading: 7, L> gpm -

'

Yes No

4. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and $a- Spring House is acceptable?


, Yes No

1 0. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable? d o


Y . - - <-

z + - X 5

2 -

- -

' -

Action Required

n-

a

Action Required

6. S i d c a n t accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House?

12. Significant acam&on of solids in Collection Tank or Collection struchd



Action

15. G e n d houseknping/debris around Treabnent Building is m/ - [7 I acceptable? -k= 16. Building structure (roof, doors, paint) in acceptable

condition?


18. First aid k i ~ emergency eye wash, fire extinguisher in ac~eptabie condition?



2 1. Pressure switches/actuators hctional?

22. Automatic diaier/phone line functional?

u - 0. d o .

Item #



Mr. Fomey;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring # I was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring #l. Samples were nottaken downstream of the security fence at Klapper siring. spring not running. Security fence around Klapper Spring was found in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning.

END OF REPORT.


Thank you,

Scott A. ~ a y & Cc: Carl Shaw


OPERABLE UNIT #1

1 Ambient Temp. (OF) 76 Weather Conditions: vr M L/

A

1. Three-way valve 2. Pressure gauge reading:


Action - Yes No / Required 1 :


6. Sigdcant accumdation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House?

5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? d 0


I 9. Flow meter ;edng: .


0 j.


-- --


12. Significant accumulation of solids in CoUection Tank or Collection Structure?

•

- . . . - -

13. Number of spent carbon drums in buiidmg.


Action Y e s , No / Required

15. G e n d housekeepmg/debris around Treatment Building is d 0 1 - . .

acceptable? 1

16. Buiiding structure (roof, doors, paint) in acceptable condition?

17. Any Ieak~ng pipes, fittings, vaives, equipment?

18. First aid k% emergency eye wash, fire extiqukher in acceptable condition? u 0

19. Heat tracing and dnnn heaters in acceptable condition?

20. Level sensors fuactional?

2 1. Pnssure switches/acmabrs functional? d ~ . I 22. Automatic dialer/phone line functional?

I -- - --

Comments Item #



Mr. Fomey;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #1 was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the pmduction discharge ports of Cox Spring. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring #I. Samples were nottaken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring, spring not running. Security fence around Klapper Spring was found in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning. End of report.


Thank you,

Scott A. ~ a ~ e g Cc: Carl Shaw

SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECIlON LOG TRIXITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE

OPERABLE UNIT #1

bd" Ambient Temp. (OF)

r? +ad 1. Three-way valve a 2. Pressure gauge reading:

&0334 3. Flow meter reading:

Action -

Action Yes No 1 Required //

Yes No

4. General housekeping/debris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable? d EL

*.;, 5 . Exposed pipe insuiation in acceptable condition? dn

8. Pressure gauge reading: A s i g

I 9. Flow meter reading:

I

10. General housekeepinghiebris mund Collection Tank and, Collection Structure is acceptable?

1

1 1 . Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? . I 8


Required

0.

12. SignLficant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Collection S m ~ ?

-

i

:

7

- 13. Number of spent carbon drums in building.

14. Number of virgin carbon d m in building. .

Yes No

15. G e n d housekeeping/debris around Treatment Building is acceptable?

6 0.- 16. Building structure (roof, doors, paint) in acceptable

condition? d n . -

17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves, equipment? 0 ' Ga// 18. First aid kif emergency eye wash, fire exthgui&er in

acceptable condition? f l u :

19. Heat tracing and drum heaters in acceptable condition? w-- u- 20. Levei sensors functional? u 21. Pressure switches/actuators hctional? d o . 22. Automatic dialer/phone line functional? u

Action Required

0:

o- a. 17

0. O. • 0

Commcnts Item #

.


RE: Tri-City disposal Site, Operation\Maintenance-Report (05-01)

Mr. Forney;

On 05-29-01 the operations and maintenance requirements were performed at t6e Tri-City disposal site according to the O&M plan.

Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #1 was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring #l. Samples were taken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring, spring running. Security fence around Klapper Spring was found in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning. End of report.


Thank you,

Gu+ Scott A. Hayes Cc: Carl haw

SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPEC~ION LOG TRI-CITY INDUS'I'RIAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE LJNlT #1

// ~ a t e : s 4 . / . Time: L(/& Operator: r/ikr\*f I /I Ambient Temp. ('FJ Weather ~ o n d i t i o n s : ' ~

A

1. Three-way valve positio d n m d 2. Pressure gauge reading: f p i g 3. Flow meter reading: 313SL)du,,

4 P m -


4. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptabie? d a l U-

5 . Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition?

6. Sigmficant accumuiation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House?

7. '12uee-way valve position n m d 8. Pressure gauge reading:

9. Flow meter reading: m

. .

12. Sigdcant a m m u h i o n of solids in Collection Tank or Collection Structure? -

. Yes No Action

Required


11. Exposed pipe indation in acceptabie condition?

13. Nlrmber of spent carbon drums in building. I 14. Number of virgin carbon dnrms in building. a/


2 No 1 G&* acceptable? a- a-

16. Building structure (roof, doors, paint) in acceptabie condition?


18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire extinguisher in accqtable condition?



21. Pressure switcheslactuators functional?

22. Automatic diaier/phone line functionai?

w a- d n-. a" a.

CommentJ Item #


RE: Tri-City disposal Site,

Mr. Forney;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #1 was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring #1. Samples were not taken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring, spring not running. Samples were not taken from Klapper Spring, spring not running. Security fence around Klapper Spring was found in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning. End of report.


Thank you,


SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECTION LOG TRI-CITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE ' . .

OPERABLE UNIT #1

. .

4. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptabie? d a

5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? Q

0.

a-

: -

';:

6. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House?

m a

7. Three-way valve position r auxiliary): Thlcd? Le 8. Pressure gauge reading: psig

9. Flow meter reading: /%5f/7 p,allons EL3 >gpm

- _ . Yes No

10. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection Struchm is acceptable? 60

11. Exposed pipe insuiation in acceptable condition? . rn 12. Signtficant accmlldatipn of solids in Collection Tank or '%&& Collection S m c t u d .

Action Required

a:: / - \ .

*-

Treatment- . . U 13. Number of spent carbon drums in buildmg. I 14. Number of virgin wbon drums in buiiding.

15. General hounckeping/debris around Treabnent Building is 1 - acceptable?

16. Building strumxe (roof, doors, paint) in acceptable condition?

- 17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves, equipment?

18. First aid kif emergency eye wash, fire extmgukher in acceptable condition?

19. Heat tracing and dnrm heaters in acceptable condition? a. 0- 1 20. Level sensors functional?

2 1. Pressure switches/acNatOrs functional?

22. Automatic dialer/phone line functional? • [11

Item #

Mr. James Forney Waste Management Inc. 19200 W. 8 Mile Rd. Southfield. MI. 48075

RE: f ri-City disposal Site, Report

Mr. Fomey;

On 08-01-01 the operations andmaintenance requirements were performed at the Tri-City disposal site according to the O&M plan.

Treatment building was found in goad condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #l was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring #1. Samples were not taken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring, spring not running. Samples were not taken from Klapper Spring, spring not running. Security fence around Klapper Spring was found in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning. End of report.

Please call should you have any questioni regarding this or any other maintenance report.

Thank you,

Q Scott A. Hayes Cc: Carl Shaw

SYSTEM OPERATION AND LNSPECIlON LOG TRI-CITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE .

OPERABLE UNIT #1

1 ~ a t c : r -1-4 1 . 9 operator x k d I Ambient Temp. (OF)=. W+er Conditions: GnM LI

n m d 1. ThrePway valve position r aU)tijiSLIY): 7 2. Pressure gauge reading:

&1440/ 3. Flow meter reading:

Action - Yes No Required ..


5 Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition?

6. Sigmficant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House?

psig

9. Flow meter reading: A d o m iad < gpm

Action . 10. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and

Collection Structure is acceptable?

1 1. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? 4' n 12. Sigdlcant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

Collection Stntcane?

13. Number of spent carbon drums in building. 1 14. Number of virgin carbon d m in building. 3

Yes , No IS. Generai houwkaping/debris around Treabnmt Building is 'z

acceptable? / 16. Building structure (rooL doors, paht) in acceptable

condition? 1 7. Any leaking pipes, fittings, 'valves, equipment?

18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire exhguisher in ac4qtab1e condition?'

Action *

Resuired - u-

19. Heat tracing and d m heaters in acceptable condition? 0- 20. Levei sensors functional? u 0. 21. Pressure switches/actuators fimctional?

% . I 22. m ma tic dialerjphone line fimctional?

Comments

Y Item # I



Mr. Fomey;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #I was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge ports of Cox Spring. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring #I. Samples were taken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring, spring running. Samples were taken from Mapper Spring, spring running. Security fence around Mapper Spring was found in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning. End of report.


Thank you,

SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECTION LOG . . TRI-CITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL .SITE .

. OPERABLE UNIT #I

Ambient Temp. ("~)8(- Weather Conditions: 34 4 v I: .-. .I..'

.Y i;.

. .' a

&- -' 2,.

1. Three-way vaive position auxihry): T M ::

t - - --

2. Pressure gauge reading: psi13 . 3 3. Flow meter reading: &4?5-a& /-allom $

8 .a 5 gpm -. ':

Yes No 1 Required 1

4. G e n d housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable?


6. Sigmflcant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or i ..

Spring House?

=poaitio=i r d w l : n h d 8. Pressure gauge reading: 6 13- psig

9. Flow meter reading: 1 $ a l l o m gpm

Action

10. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection Structm is acceptable?

1 1 . Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? I 12. Si@cant accumMon of solids in Collection Tank or

Colleztion Structure? J

\.

1 13. Number of spmr carbon drums in building. 14. Number of virgin carbon drum in building.

Yes No 15. Genera3 housekeeping/debris around Treatment Building is

acceptable? 16. Building stmctm (rooE, doors, paint) in acceptable

condition? 17. Any ieidcing pipes, fittings, valves, equipment?

18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire exthgukher in acceptable condition? '




22; Automatic dialedphone line functional?

Action Resuind - 0:

Comments Item #



Mr. Fomey;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #I was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge port and pre-process port of Cox Spring. Samples taken from the production discharge port and pre-process port of Unnamed Spring # A . Samples were not taken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring, spring not running. Samples were not taken from Klapper Spring, spring not running. Security fence around Klapper Spring was found in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in and functioning. End of report.



SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECIlON LOG . TRI-CITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SlTE '

OPERABLE UNIT #1

Ambient Temp. (OF) 7 fl Weather Conditions: 5 MM L/

f

1. Three-way valve position f l m w d ' .

2. Pressure gauge rezding: I?# d 3. Flow meter reading: 2&&3 7 9 dons

. x k m a -.

Action Yes No 1 Required 1

4. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable? dm

o- ( 5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? I/: 6. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

Spring House?

7. Three-way valve4 positio &oradary): fldW,d 8. Pressure gauge reading: 7, s' psig

9. FIOW meter reading: / 9 f g 7 b gallons 7.c qpm

. ,Yes No

10. Generai housekeeping/debris around ColIection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable?

12. Signtficant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Collection Stnrcture?

Action Required

da 1 1 . Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? n.

1 13. Number of spent carbon drump in buiiding. 14. Number of virgin carbon dnnns in building.

. .

Action '

15. Genend housekeeping/debris around Treatment Building is acceptable?

16. Building s t r u m (roo& doors, paint) in acceptable condition?

- 17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves, equipment?

18. First aid kit, emagency eye wash, fire extinguisher in acceptable condition?

19. Heat tracing and d m heaters in acqtable condition? 0- 1 0. 20. Level sensors functional?

2.1. Pressure switchts/actuators functional?

22. Automatic dialer/phone line hctional?

cQlnma3 Item #

Mr. James Fomey Waste Management Inc. 19200 W. 8 Mile Rd. Southfield, MI. 48075 ,

I

RE: Tri-City disposal Site, OperationMllaintenance Report (1041) 1 .

Mr. Fomey;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #1 ,was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production dischatge port of Cox Spring. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring #I. Samples were not taken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring, spring not running. Security fence around Klapper Spring was found in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning. End of report.

Please call should yo" have any questions regarding this or any other maintenance report.

Thank you,

scott A. b y e s Cc: Cad Shaw

SYSTEM OPERATION AND LNSPECTION LOG TRI€ITY INDUbcTRIGL DISPOSAL SITE .

OPERABLE UNIT #1

1. Three-way valve position 2. Pressure gauge reading: 3. Flow meter reading:


5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? 0


7. Three-way valve position or zuxiliary): 8. Pressure gauge reading: psig 9. Flow meter reading: a d fa 3ailons

g 1 , gpm

. Yes No

10. General housekeeping'debris around Collection Tank and Collection S t r u m is acceptable?

1 1 . Exposed pipe i d o n in acceptable condition? d o

Action Required

12. Sigdicant ~crrmuhion of solids in Collection Tank or Colleztion St-?

B J

*

- 13. Number of spent wbon drums in building. J 14. Number of virgin carbon d m in building. &-

8 Yes/ No 15. General housekeepingldebris around Treafment Building is

acceptable? d: o- 16. Building structure (roo& doors, paint) in acceptable

condition? d a_,

Action - Required

o-

- 17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves, equipment? a. 18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fke extinguisher in

acceptable condition? d u :

19. Heat tracing and drum heaters in acceptable condition? m'o- u


21. Pressure switches/acruators functional?

22. Automatic dialer/phone line functional? u- Comments Item #

.



Mr. Forney;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #1 was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Cox Spring. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring #l . Samples were not taken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring, spring not running. I

Security fence around Klapper Spring was found in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning. End of report.


Scott A. dyes Cc: Carl Shaw

SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECTION LOG TRI- INDUSTIUAL DISPOSAL S F '

OPERABLE UNIT #1

Ambient Temp. ("F) Weather Conditions: & e!v

A

1. Three-way valve position 2. Pressure gauge reading: 3. Flow meter reading:

4. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable? du- . : .

5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? j W a U: : .

6. SipScant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House?

7. Three-way valve position =or auxiliary): L d 8. Pressure gauge reading: grd p i g

9. Flow meter reading: -0om a m


10. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable? d o n

1 1 . Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? I 12. Sigdicant a c a m ~ w n of solids in Collection Tank or

Collection Structure? d . .

14. Number of virgin carbon dnrms in building.


-17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves, equipment?

18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, £ire extmgukher in acceptable condition?



2 1. Pressure switchedacarators functional?

.

Mr. James Femey Waste Management Inc. 1 WOQ W.. 8 Mile Rd. Southfield, MI. 48075

RE; f ri-City disposal Site, QperationMllaintenanse Report (12-01)

Mr. ~omey;

On 01614-83 the operations and maintenance requirements were performed at the Tri-City disposal site according to the O&M plan.

. . f

Treatment building was found in good andition with no serious defidendes - found.

Cex Spring system was up and running, All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #1 was up and running, All system checks perf~rmed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the preduaion discharge pert of Cox Spring, Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring #l. Samples were taken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring, spring running. Security fence around Klapper Spring was found in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning. End of report.

Please call should you have any questions regarding this or any ether maintenance report.

Thank yoy,

Cc: Carl haw

SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECXION LOG TRI-CITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE .

OPERABLE UNIT #l

g ate: 1-9 -4 / . Time: 3 '2 Operator: 5- Lk5 I

Ambient Temp. (OF) 3 'T Weather Conditions:. :,Ah r\

.-. ,:. - :-. - . .? - -

4-

1. Three-way valve position fl~&%d 3. d I .

/ D 2. Pressure gauge reading: I)& 3 i-

Xi7417 -

3. Flow meter reading: gallom - -. 7. r gpm -.

Action - Yes No / R q & 1 :

4. General housekeqing/dehis around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable?

5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? K n. : 6. Simcant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

Spring House?

L

7. Three-way valve positio V L ~ R ~ R - 2 2 / B 8. Pressure gauge reading: psig

9. Flow meter reading: 2 l b 7 d F gallons 71 5 q m

Action Ys No / Required 1.

10. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and Collection S t r u m is acceptable? d o

I I . Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? J CI n a.

12. Significant acnrmulatidn of solids in Collection Tank or Collection Stnrcture? '

m, / - . - \ .

13. Number of spent carbon dnnns in building. f

14. Number of vi@ carbon drums in building. & Action a

15. General housekeepingldebds muud Treatment acceptable?

16. Building stnrcture (roofl doors, paint) in acceptable condition?

.17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves, equipment?

18. First aid kif emergency eye wash, fire exthgukher in acceptable condition?



2 1. Pressure switchedactuators functional?

22. Automatic dialedphone line hctionai? - - - - - -p --

1- Item # I-

I Mr. James Fomey Waste Management Inc. Heritage Office Park West 3970 Heritage Av, Ste A Okemos, MI. 48864

RE: TrilCity disposal Site, OperationWaintenance Report (01-02)

Mr. Fomey;.

On 01 -31 -02 the operations and maintenan- requirements were performed at. the Tri-City disposal site according to the O&M plan.

Treatment building was found in gwd condition with no serious deficiencies found. Gox Spring system was up and running: All system eheeks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #1 was up and running All system &e&s performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the produetion discharge port- of Gox. Spring.. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring #I. Samples were taken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring, spring running. Samples were taken from Klapper Spring. Security fence around Mapper Spring was found in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning. End of report.

Please all should you have any questions regarding this or any other maintenance report.

Thank y ~ u ,

Scstt A. ayes Cc: Carl Shaw

SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECXION LOG TRI-CXTY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE UNIT #1

D a k : / - 4 / ~ L , Tme:36A op€%3t0~

Ambient Temp. (OF) h5 Weather Conditions: C/&

1. Tbrce-way valve position-adary): 6 x l y 1 d .

.2. Pressure gauge reading: 30 psig 3. Flow meter reading: 2 % 3 ydom

7 d A gpm -.

Action / Required

4. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable? Elf n'- n-

5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? w U' n. 6. Signtficant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

Sorinn House? --

8. Pressure gauge reading: psig 9. Flow meter reading: ~ / E O '2 gallons x. d gpm

. Yes No

10. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection Struchtre is acceptable? El


12. Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or CoUection ~tructrae? 17: U

k v , 0 , .

1 Action Required

' 13. Numbex of spent rarbon drums in building. 14. Number of virgin carbon d m in building.

Yes No 15. General houssksspmg/ddebris around Treafment Building is '-

acceptable?

16. Building structure (roo5 doors, paint) in acceptable condition?


18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fke exthpsher in . acceptable condition?

w CI-:


20. Level sensors functionai?

2 1. Pressure switches/acruators funcrional?

22. Automatic dialedphone Line functional?

Action Requted -

0:

Item #

Carl Shaw EarthTech 3033 Campus Dr. Minneapolis, MN. 55441

Re: Bi-Yearly clean up.

Carl;

On 2-16-02 we were on site to perform bi-yearly cleanup and solids removal from holding tanks.

Cox Spring - no appreciable amount of solids in tank, cleaned off tank pad and surrounding area. UnNamed Spring - small amount of solids in tank, cleaned and flushed. Rust is developing at the bottom of holding tank extending approximately 6" up. Rust was scraped off and a diverter placed below overflow outlet to reduce the chances of additional moisture coming in contact with this area. Recommend a coating to prevent further damage to tank. Cleaned off tank pad. Removed debris, rock, dirt and mud from pea gravel check dam also cleaned filter fabric covering check dam. Check dam had approximately 18" of eroded material covering 75% of check dam. Filter House - cleaned and removed debris and trash from area. Changed out leaking drums. Both Cox Spring and UnNamed Spring drums had bottoms rusted out and leaking. One drum on Cox Spring has rust holes developing around effluent bung. Recommend the use of plastic drums if available. Used all virgin drums to change out damaged drums. No virgin drums on site, three used drums. We will need at least two additional drums due to high pressures on Cox Spring. Elevated all active drums to reduce any further damage to drums. End

If you have any questions concerning this or any other monthly report please contact me at your convenience.

Thank you,

/ Scott Hayes

Mr. James Fomey Waste Management Inc. Heritage Office Park West 3970 Heritage Av, Ste A Okemos, MI. 48864


Mr. Fomey;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #I was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Cox Spring. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring #I. Samples were taken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring, spring running. Security fence around Klapper Spring was found in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning. End of report.


Thank you,

Scott A. ~ a ~ e s v Cc: Cart Shaw

- ~ a t c : e $ . . rme: . 3- *'

Ambient Temp. (DF) 3 c . . 7'

. . . .

. . . . - - . .. - .

1. ~hree-way valve positi , 6 3 m rR 9. q. 2. Pressure gauge reading:

3. Flow meter reading: 3 * ~ L / T L gallons +gpm-.

Action :." Yes No Required I

4. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable? k [7 [7.

5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable. condition? wn- ,,p . .

6. . Significant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House? .

C

I . . - .. - - . .- - . + - '

E. 3

4. ~ 5 1 %

13. Number of spent carbon drum in building. 14. Number of vkgin carbon drums in building.

AC~& . Yes No Required

15. G e d houseiurepingidebris around Treatment Building is 7 acceptable? 16. Building stnrcture (roof, doors, paint) in acceptable

condition? .17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves, equipment?

18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fke exhgukher in acceptable condition?

19. Heat tracing and drum hearers in acceptable condition?



22. Automatic dialerfphone line functional? d cQlmmQ Item #

0 . - 4 ( 7 / ~ * , ~ , . / &# / &?Sh '<? /' *rc

Mr. James Forney Waste Management Inc. Heritage Office Park West 3970 Heritage Av, A Okemos, MI. 48864


Mr. Forney;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #I was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Cox Spring. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring #I. Samples were taken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring, spring running. Security fence around Klapper Spring was found in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning. Changed out spent drums, received new drums from North American Aqua. End of report.


Thank you,

Scott A. ayes Cc: Carl Shaw

- .$g$\.;, :;Ti> .- . . .A> . %

,--I . ..44e&*.y*... - --s"--*.- swhu OPERATION AM) ~ N S P E ~ O N LOG -QQi;s - . . ," TRI-CITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPER~BLE UNIT #I ' L . .

Ambient Temp. (OF)=- Weather Conditions:

1. Three-way valve position 2. Pressure gauge reading:

'3. Flow meter reading:

4. General housekeepmg/debris around Collection Tank and

;

'


5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? d n 6. Sigdicant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

Spring House? / i

:.

7. Three-way valve positio a (no or auxiliary): ~ 1 d 8. Pressure gauge reading: ,

9. Flow meter reading: 9a39b allons B m

. Yes No

10. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable? d o

1 1 . Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? dm

Action Required

12. Significaat ac~tnn-*on of solids in Collection Tank or C-oUectioa s*? ' - b -

- < - : . pg- - . - 7 -


15. General housekeepingldebris around Treatment Building is

-* 17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves, equipment?


.19. Heat tracing and d m heaters in acceptable condition?


21. Pnsmre switches/actuators functional?

.

Mr. James Fomey Waste Management Inc. Heritage Office Park West. _ . . .. . . ..

.. 3970 Heritage Av, A Okemos, MI. 48864

RE: Tri-City disposal Site, OperationWlaintenance Report (0402)

Mr. Fomey;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Unnamed Spring #l was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Cox Spring. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring #1. Samples were taken downstream of the security fence at Mapper Spring, spring running. Samples were taken from the spring at Mapper Spring for quarterly sampling. Security fence around Klapper Spring was found in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning. End of report.


Thank you,

Scott A. kIayk Cc: Carl Shaw

SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPEcI'ION LOG TRIXITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE -

OPERABLE UNIT #1

Ambimt Temp. (OF) 7 0 Weather Conditions: s ~ n M I/

A

1. 'Tbx-way vaive position r auxihry): J)/lxwvvL.e- 2. Pressure gauge reading: bL ~ s i g 3. Flow meter reading: S ~ D Q ~ Z gallons

gpm -

Action


5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? b n n 6. Sigdicant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or

Spring House?

7. Thee-way valve position ( m r a m ) : Ce md

8. Pressure gaugereading: p i g 9. Flow meter reading: 2245fd gallons

f , a

. 10. '~eneral housekeepingldebrh around Collectign Tank and

., Collection Structure'is acceptable?

1 1. Exposed pipe imhtion in acceptable condition? 1 a. 1, 12. S w c a n t on of solids in Collection Tank or -

Collection Str t tc~m?

-

13. N& of spent carbon d m in building. I 14. Numkr of virgin carbon drums in buiiding.

Action

15. General housekeeping/debris around Tmmeat Building is ' acceptable?

16. Building strumre (root doors, paint) in acceptable condition?

17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves, equipment? [7 w [7

18. Fist aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire e-er in accqtable condition?

19. Heat tracing and drum he;iters in acceptable condition? e n - I 20. Level sensors functional?

2 1. Pressurt switches/actllators functional?

2 2 Automatic diaiedphone line functional?

CDmments - Item #

Mr. James Fomey Waste Management Inc. Heritage Office Park West 3970 Heritage Av, A Okemos, MI. 48864

RE: Tri-City disposal Site, Operation\Maintenance Report (0502)

Mr. Fomey;

On 05-31 -02 the operations and maintenance requirements were performed at the Tri-City disposal site according to the O&M plan.

Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system was not running. Problem with float switch, call placed to electrical support. Will set up time to trouble shoot. Unnamed Spring #1 was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring #I. Samples were taken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring, spring running. Security fence around Klapper Spring was found in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning. End of report.


Thank you,

Scott A. ~ a ~ & Cc: Carl Shaw

- - - - - -- . I SYSTEM OPERATION AM) I N S P E m N LOG

TRI-C'ITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE ' OPERABLE UNlT #1

Ambient Trmp. (OF) 8 Wsatha Conditions: J ~ M kt/ . ... .-.

1. Three-way valve positi 2. Pressme gauge reading: .3. Flow meter reading:


6. Significant accumdation of sotids in CoIIection Tank or Spring House?

- -

i -

Yes No

4. General housekeepLngldeb around Coffection Tank and Spring House is acceptable? d a-

8. Pressure gauge reading: psig 9. Flow meter reading: 2 33 P . 3 gallons

f a d qrn

Action Requued

a-

1 Action 1 Yes No Required

10. 'Genera1 hokekeepingldebris around Collectipn Tank and . CoUection Strucaae'is acceptable? . . . , . . d o / U .

1 1. Exposed pipe hsdatio'n in acceptable condition?

. ? .. .- .. .. -._.:.._- . . - ...- ... . . ... f -,y . . . ..

14. Number of virgin carbon mumJ in building.

16. Building structure (root doors, paint) in acceptable


18. F i i aid & emergency eye wash, fire exhguisher in acctptable condition?

19. Heat tracing and dnrm heaters in acceptable condition?

20. Levei sensors fuacrional? : I

21. Pnssure switc~es/actuators functional? 6 0 . 0 22 Automatic diaierfphone line functional? W"U Comments Item #

- - -

& 5 &I,& A;& nat ~P~~LGLG? QWUL, k71 d r p A k ~ % "

\

. . , .

, . . .. .. . ' . . . , ..

-. . Mr. James Fomey , .

9 U..',, , . ..... . .-. i Waste Management Inc. .. , . , . .-. . . . . Heritage Office Park West : 1

. . I:: i ';jl 3970 Heritage Av, A . . . . . . i.. .,;I; I . ;! Okemos, MI. 48864 . , - . . I' . . . .

'.I : . . . . . . . . . " . . . . . .

RE: Tri-City disposal Site, Operation\Maintenance ~e~or t ' (d6&2)

Mr. Fomey;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Cox Spring. Unnamed Spring #1 was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring #I. Samples were taken downstream of the secunty fence at Klapper Spring, spring running. Security fence around Klapper Spring was found in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning. End of report.


Thank you,

s&tt A. ~ a ~ & i Cc: Carl Shaw

SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECXION LOG TRIKllT INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE UNIT #1

~atsbL7-~,E T-: 0pe3ator: 5 3-0 Ambient Temp. (OF) Weather Conditioas: P K c , ddy

- n b b e

.-. ,: - 2

. .* - .. , C.

Yes No


1. Three-way valve p. -

2. Pressute gauge reading: -r - .3. Flow meter reading:

A m -. 9

Action Required

4. General h o u s e ~ m g / d e h s around Coilection Tank and Spring House is acqtable? d u -

6. Siguiicant accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House?

U-

7. Three-way valve positi ( n c i d r auxiliary): ~d G a b 8. Pressure gauge reading: psig

9. Flow meter reading: 33437k ~allons m

. I Action Yes No Required

1 1. Exposed pipe lnrvindoh in acceptable condition? d.0 1 10. ~ e n e r d hokxkeepingldebris around Collection Tank and . Collection S-'is acceptable?

. , . . u

I2. Si@- &umdah~ of 066. in CoUection T d or , d/& . Collection S - 9 . . . .

,, U r ,

. - .

. . . . .. . . . . . \ . : ... .

. . -..- . . >'.. - . . . : i v . - . - ..... .

. . . .

14. Number of virgin carbon drums in building. , ,

#16. Building structure (root doors, paint) in acceptable


18. First aid kit, em-cy8cye wash, fire extinpsher in acceptable condition?


20. Level sensors funciional?

21. Pressure switcheslactuators functional?


Cnrmments Item #

.

. . . .

. . ,' -

- -

,. I

.. . . . . . .

Mr. James Forney Waste Management Inc. Heritage Office Park West 3970 Heritage Av, A Okemos, MI. 48864

RE: Tri-City disposal Site, OperationWaintenance Report (07-02)

Mr. ,Forney;


Treatment building was found in good condition with' no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Cox Spring. Unnamed Spring #I was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring #I. Samples were not taken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring spring not running. Security fence around Klapper Spring was found in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning. End of report.


Thank you,

Cc: Carl haw

. . . -::.;- ? . , K y - 7. ; -. -- . _ _ . . . .

- - SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECIION' LOG

TRI-CITY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE - - OPERABLE UNIT #1 .

Date: 7 ~ x 1 ~ bL . Tire: 3: 60

, Id+ Ambient Temp. (OF) 7q Weather Conditions: 2 m .

d

1. Three-way vaive position && 2. Pressure gauge reading: 3. Flow meter reading: gallons

gpm -.

1 Action

4. Generai housekeepmg/deinis around ColIection Tank and Spring House is acceptable? d ~ - U-

5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? w n 6. Sidcant accumuiation of solids in Collection Tank or

Spring House?

7. Three-way valve positio or auxiliary): - 8. Pressure gauge miding: (A

9. Flow meter reading: m

,

' - L . - . . . . ' . .. . . .. . . . .. . . ' - . . . - A . < .c. ;' ." '. . . , . . . . ,- . , . . . . . ' I ' . . . . ' . . . .- '. .. .. . . .. . . . .. .L /

:

. . . . .. . ' . . .

. Yes No

10. 'General housekecping/&bris mund Collection Tank and . Collection ~trucane'is acceptable? .da.

. .

a/o 11 . Exposed pipe indatbn in acceptable condition?

12 Significant ac&&d&ob of solids in Collection Tank or. :: wm . C Q U d O a S m ? :- . .- . . . . .

Action Required

a,.

n.

,a : . : .

;

. '

w , m . . .' . . - I .

-.

13. Numbex of spent carbon dnnns in building. 14. Numbs of virgin carbon hms in building.

Yes No I Fbqukd

15. X I h o d m T B k 'acceptable?

/

16. Building stmame (roofl doors, paint) in acceptable ' condition?


18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire exhguisher in acceptable condition?

19. Heat &g and drum he- in acceptable condition? d o- l n: 20. Level sensors functional?

22. Automatic dialer/pbone line functional? d U[ Item #

,'

Mr. James Fomey Waste Management Inc. Heritage Office Park West 3970 Heritage Av, A Okernos, MI. 48864


Mr. Forney;


Treatment building was found in good conditisn with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Cox Spring. Unnamed Spring #1 was up and running. All system checks perForrned and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring #I. Samples were not taken downstream of the security fence at Mapper Spring spring not running. Security fence around Mapper Spring was found in good condition. All samples sent for analysis. ~ightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning. End of report.


Thank you,

Scott A. Hayes / Cc: Csrl Shaw

-- - - -- - --

SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECTION LOG TRI€lTY INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE UNIT #1

1. Three-way valve positio


4. General housekeeping/defrris around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable?

-


6. S i N c a n t accumulation of solids in Collection Tank or Spring House? .

rP 8. Pressure gauge reading:

9. Flow meter reading: ~ 3 ~ e q Q 1 galom m

Action . Yes No Required

10. General housekeepingldebris around Collection Tank and Collection Strucbxe is acceptable?


12. Signis- &ukion of solids in Collection Tank or - . ' -

- -. - +' . ... r

- 13. Number of spent carbon drums in building. 14. Numba of virgin carbon dnmu in building.

Yes No I Required *&On

IS. Wed housekeqin~&br. around Treatment Building is 'T 'acceptable? .16. Building strucbne (roof, doors, paint) in acceptable

condition? 17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves, equipment?

18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire exthgkher in accqtable condition?

d n : u 19. Heat tracing and drum heaters in acceptable condition? u 0; 20. Level sensors fimctionai?

2 1. Pressure switchdacruarors functionai?


l2lmmca Item #



Mr. Fomey;


Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Cox Spring. Unnamed Spring #1 was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the produdon discharge port of Unnamed Spring #I. Samples were taken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring spring running. Samles taken from Unnamed Spring #l. Security fence around Klapper Spring has been damaged by a fallen tree. Fence is still functional with minor damage to a top support rail. Please advise. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in place and functioning. End of report.


Thank you,

Smtt A. Hayes I Cc: Carl Shaw

SYSTEM OPERATION AND INSPECITON ioc TRI- INDUSTRlAL DISPOSAL SITE '

OPERABLE UNIT#l


4. General housekeeping/de~ around Collection Tank and Spring House is acceptable?

5. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? d o 6. SigDlficant accumuialion of solids in CoUectron Tank or

Spring House? 4 0

.

7. Three-way valve position no or auxiliary):

8. Pressure gauge reading: 6 7 4 b

9. Flow meter reading: ~ 3 7 / 3 . / ~allons B m

12. Sipficant acnnnuiation of solids in Collection Tank or - Collection Strwhm?

1.- . ' -

. L 4-; .' .. 2, d

, Yes No

10. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Collection Structure is acceptable? B O

1 1. Exposed pipe insulation in acceptable condition? L" CI -0

Action Required

8 .-

I -

- , ; \ .: I

-

- -

. -i - - -

13. Number of spent carbon drums in building. 14. Number of virgin carbon d m in building. L

. d . 8

Yes, No 15. General housekeepuujdebris around Treatment Building is

accqtable? d: a-

16. Building sinctme (roof, doors, paint) in acceptable condition?

do- 17. Any leaking pipes, fittings, valves, equipment?

18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, iire e x t i q u k h r in 2: aaqtable condition?

19. Heat tracing and drum heaters in acceptable condition? dm 20. Level sensors functional? d m 21. Pressure switches/acruators funcnonai? d n 22 Automatic dialedphone line hctionai? d~

Action Requrred

a-

a.

n.

El Comments Item #

.

, - . -


RE: Tri-City disposal Site, Operation\Maintenance Report.(lO-02)

Mr. Fomey;

On 10-31 -02 the operations and maintenance requirements were performed at the Tri-City disposal site according to the O&M plan.

Treatment building was found in good condition with no serious deficiencies found. Cox Spring system was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Cox Spring. Unnamed Spring #1 was up and running. All system checks performed and no deficiencies found. Samples taken from the production discharge port of Unnamed Spring #I. Samples were taken downstream of the security fence at Klapper Spring, spring mnning. All samples sent for analysis. Lightning and electrical protection at Treatment building in .place and functioning. End of report.


Thank you,

Scott A. Hayes Cc: Cart Shaw

. . . .

. .

4. General housekeeping/debris around Collection Tank and Spring House is aoxpable?

. . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . ' < -

. f:., ::

13- N u m k of && . . . C&OII drum. in kdidhg. . . .

14. N m of* sarbon drums in building.

Action

15. Gsncral howekeqmgldebris a m d Treatment Building is m i e ?

I 16. Budding shochnc (mot doors, paint) in acseptable condition?

17. Any leaking pipes, fillings, valves, equip&?

18. First aid kit, emergency eye wash, fire extmgukher in acqtabie condition?


I 20. Levei sensors fimcdonal?

21. Pressure swit&es/acruators functional?

22 Automatic dialedphone line hctional?

'~omments Item #

Attachment D

Results of KDEP Soil Sampling

Dioxin/Furan Results** Tri City Industrial Disposal Bullitt County March 2002

TEF = Toxicity Equivalency Factors (U.S. EPA, 1989; Ahlborg, et.al., 1994)

TEQ = Toxic Equivalency (OSWER Directive 9200.4-26, Approad, for Addressing Dioxin in Soil at CERCLA and RCRA Site, establishes 1 ppb dioxindurans (TEQ's) as the recommended clean-up goal for residential soils.

TEQ = ~oxic,~qulvalency (EPA Region IX has established Prelimina~y Remediation Goals at 3.8 ppt for residential sites and 30 ppt for Industrial settings.

TEQ computed using ITEF and setting non detected analytes with a concentration half the calculated detection limit or the EMPC.

*' Previous studies have established dioxin background at 8ppt at this site.

TA 8 2 - continued ~ioxin /~uran Results Tri City Industrial Disposal Bullitt County March 2002

TABLE 3 PCB and Metals Summary Tri City Industrial Disposal Bullitt County March 2002

Blank space = nondetect.

9, TABLE Dioxin/Furan Results** Tri City Industrial Disposal, Bullitt County December 2001

TEF = Toxicity Equivalency Factors (US. EPA, 1989; Ahlborg, et.al., 1994) - Sample Name 1 -TC-CJ-1 S

TEQ = Toxic Equivalency (OSWER Directive 9200.4-26, Approach forAddressin0 Dioxin in Soil 3-TC-CJ-2s at CERCLA and RCRA Site, establishes 1 ppb dloxindfurans (TEQ's) as the recommended clean- 5-TC-LY-1 S up goal for residential soils. 7-TC-LY -2s

9-TC-BL-1 S TEQ = Toxic Equivalency (EPA Region IX has established Preliminary Remedlation Goals at 3.8 11 -TC-BLQS ppt for residential sites and 30 ppt for industrial settings. 13-TC-POND-SED

14-TC-HS-1 S TEQ computed using ITEF and setting non detected analytes with a concentration half the 16-TC-CSPS

calculated detection limit or EMPC (highlighted). 18-TC-CS-1 S 20-TC-CS-2s

'* Previous studies have established dioxin background at 8ppt at this site. 22-TC-MG-1 S 24- I G-GL-1 S 9-TC-BL-1 S DUPE 26-TC-RINSATE

Dioxin r e p d namg lMap location -- red A837013 1 I 1 I

1, TABLE , continued Dioxin/Furan Results

, Tri City Industrial Disposal, Bullitt County December 2001

Attachment E

Community Involvement Interviews

5-Year Review Questionnaire A .

Site -- &Xi &accCIC

CitylState A,-+!!/ 7 T ~ ~ L F 0~~ w I

9

Date: d2'?h3 Phone No, (3-2.A) 4-fj3a- fi%d

Name of Citizen &Y&~&., 1 d

Address /6f 7?2~,&.,A,'/ /I :I R ?

How long have you lived near the Site? u Are you familiar with EPA activities over the past years?

Do you think you have been adequately informed about clean up activities at the Site?

Is there any information about the Site that you would like to share with us that would assist in r review of site activities?

Is someone else that you would like to recommend we contact for more information? b

Do you havzany suggestions that EPA can implement to improve communication with the public? L

4 p G , L.q9-J& /c7$_j d i L . - 6 &%hk & / J

'9 3 [A copy of the &year review will be placed in the Site lnformation Repository file located in the Site Information Repository at

Interview conducted b g Date conducted :

r -

5-Year Review Questionnaire

Site Jm~‘Lgt+b CityIState / &*& l I

/k2/LiX i , U.' P-

Date: It

Phone No. ,~>JMcT- ?&C-'3-

Name of Citizen &. c. ~ ~ - . & & !

Address

V How long have you lived near the Site?

Y

Are you familiar with EPA activities over the past years? &u/ u

--

Do yo9 think you have been adequately informed about clean up activities at the Site? L/] &&

0 Is there any information about the Site that you would like to share with us that would assist in

of site activities?

meone eke f hat you w Id like to recommend we contact for more information? 96LkdF

(9 ( Do you have any suggestions that EPA can implement to improve communication with the P U ~ Ad

[A copy of the 5-year review will be placed in the Site Information Repository file located in the Site Information Repository at

-.. .

Interview conducted by- Date conducted : qh 7/01


Site & - f f ~ ~ L ~ u k d , A)i,GLL:; CityIState ,&,,+J! j U,ddH .., .

f/' V

Date: v'%&dLL dq, ,> f ,3 Phone No. qd-7 - ,

Name of Citizen e* ,A? X % L ~ ~ J U ' / /

Address f - / u

How long have you lived near the Site? 1.3b + & e c . d

Are you familiar with EPA activities over the past years? b+w

Do you have any su can implement to improve communicatio public? '?hj* , $.&A / 3 7 ~ 4 ~ 4&& /+Yr

SJPp .L-Ul kdL4 bf & d 7 %*& . u .J

[A copy of the 5-year review will be placed in the Site Information Repository file located in the Site lnformation Repository at

-- *

Interview conducted b - Date conducted :


-&& dJ--. [. u.6' 4 ,w~~i J$/& Site CityiState * / ' &,/;-c 4-k xK

f / ' // V 'V2 y/c3 Date: PhoneNo. 9 ~ 5 - - ~ 4 3 5 '

. , l(j&.,d A Name of Citizen

Address I ' AWL,+ ydv +d/b.~'

How long have you lived near the Site? , ~ A - & ? ~ u

Are you familiar with EPA activities over the past years? y w V

still have any concerns regarding EPA clean up activities of the Site? D

at this Site?

c/ 2' J

Do you think you have been adequately informed about clean up activities at the Site?

Is there any information about the Site that you would like to share with us that would assist in our 5-year review of site activities? 7%

I

Ise that you would like to recommend we contact for more information?

sjgtgestions that EPA can implement to improve communication with the 4 d4-4 J

[A copy of the 5-year review will be placed in the Site Information Reposttory file located in the Site Information Repository at

-.. -

Interview Date mnducted :


Site zs?L - (5, C ~ L i ~ d d JJAme.Lo .?jkU citylstate ,&uw-J< L & ~ ~ ~ , C ~ G , .

.. Y L

F Phone No. 63 A) f l 7 - d L// J-

h. mcyr Name of Citizen Y f k F .- I d/!J , AL,~;,&~ ,&/LCL& a,& L Address L L ~ ~ A& ~A~LPY~~L,?&L~u, / YdI,

How long have you lived near the Site? /q

Are you familiar with EPA activities over the past years? p clean up activities of the Site?

- 7 /+d ,- f '

\ (1

Overall, have you bee pleased or displeased with EPA actions at this Site? ~h>;~ c h dbc .tr.A+ 6, pBd &4, k,%di( ~ - 6 - &

Q &J .3p'&&&~ c/ J

at the Site?

Is there any information about the Site that you would like to share with us that would assist'in our 5-year review of site activities?

'*A ,

someone else that you would like to recommend we contact for more information?

Do you have any suggestions that EPA can implement to improve communication with the public?

[A copy of the 5-year review will be placed in the Site lnformation Repository file located in the Site lnformation Repository at

Interview conducted by: Date conducted : .3/s $/b 1-3

Date post:	18-Oct-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times

TRI-CITY DISPOSAL CO. KENTUCKY Prepared by · BROOKS, BULLITT COUNTY, KENTUCKY EPA ID: KYD981028350...

Documents