Trial Brief in Front of International Court of Appeals

7/31/2019 Trial Brief in Front of International Court of Appeals

1/53

TRIAL BRIEF IN FRONT OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF APPEAL

COPIES TO AMERICAN HOUSE OF CONGRESS AND US SENATE

ON THE BENCH: THE RIGHT HONORABLE JUSTICE KNOW STENCHADDRESS: INFINITE SUMMIT FLOOR,

FEDERATED ETERNITY CHAMBERS,333, INTERNATIONAL WEB FREEWAY,GLOBAL CYBER SPACE DOME,TWIN CITIES OF FREEDOM & WISDOM.

RESTRICTIONS: NONE OPEN SITTING FORUM WORLD PUBLIC WELCOME.

LOUIS LECLEZIO FAMILY et al.

Plaintiffs

v.

MICHAEL & MYRNA DARLAND -DONORS TO FREEDOMWORKS &THEIR CLAIM: FREE SPEECH OURPROPERTY.

Defendants.

))))))))))))

NO. 04 - TRUTH - 2- B - 1PLAINTIFFS'TRIAL BRIEF

Plaintiffs' Trial Brief


2/53

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.Introduction...........................................................................................32. Background History......6

3. Authoritative Documents.............................................................7

4. US and International Authorities....10

5. Hearing Transcript...13

6. Google Free Speech....19

7. Main StreetMatters25

8. Law Provisions...................29

9. Pleadings30

10. Conclusion31

11. Excerpts from Post ......31

12. Past posts.43

13. Google Notices.

.. 43

14. US Congress US Senate....43

15. Attorney James D. McBride.45

16. Snocadia Pictures.....50


3/53

17. My profile.. .50

18. MUSIC: We are the world Our own song Think Je Chante Avec ToiLibert

Le Morne.

1. INTRODUCTION

At issue:

1. Should contributors and /or subscribers to FreedomWorks work torestrict and control

Free Speech globally in order to avoid being embarrassed by warrantedFree Speech?

2. Are Google international policies set by the Google board or can

Google policies be

shaped and dictated to the Google board ad lib by any small time Judgefrom any small town

USA?

In this case: Judge Michael E. Cooper from the small rural desert town ofEllensburg (Pop. 18,174 in 2010) issued a Court Order denying FreeSpeech across International frontiers while vesting unto him powers ofglobal jurisdiction.

3. This Brief is about a small time judge from small town America

triggering a momentous momentum gathering Snowball through a hasty

off the cuff ruling denying Freedom of Speech to an individual posting


4/53

from Africa. The poor attempt by Judge Michael E. Cooper to squash Free

Speech across international frontiers has boomeranged. Judge Michael E

Coopers ruling has shaped and sent a snowball rolling down slippery

slopes. Moreover, it appears that Judge Cooper granted such a hurried

and rash irrational ruling within minutes in an effort to please a

hometown attorney crony. The snowball has now landed on the

international stage. Bursting open on landing, the snowball has splashed

this story, worthy of international attention, all over the world media.

The Banner Reads: Free Speech cannot be denied to anyone

anyhow anywhere over the globe by any small time Judge

from just about any small town in America.

Journalists and commentators are likely to draw parallels between the

conflict involving Michael L. Darland, Judge Michael E. Cooper, Google and

Louis Leclezio, with the Glenn Beck v. Isaac Eiland-Hall case history

handled by First Amendment expert attorney Mark Randazza.

That legal conflict between Beck and Eiland-Hall caused the Streisand

effect. It is the phenomenon where an individuals attempt to censor

material on the internet in turn proves to make the material more public.

Media is likely to increasingly cover the Louis Leclezio web sites

www.snocadia-promoter-michael-l-darland.info under construction

concerning Leclezios right to global Free Speech because Michael L.

Darland and Judge Michael E. Cooper have caused, during a hearing
http://www.snocadia-promoter-michael-l-darland.info/http://www.snocadia-promoter-michael-l-darland.info/


5/53

lasting minutes only, Google to shut down various Leclezio blogs, some on

the web since 2008, namely www.snocadia.blogspot.com and also

www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com without a trial, without any form of

due process and without any just cause.

And, in addition, Google was also requested to remove two other totally

harmless posts from www.lleclezio.blogspot.com just because they both

mentioned the name of Michael L. Darland and the one referred to the

Republican Party!

By docilely caving in to any kind of an order from any kind of a small time

Judge from any kind of a small town in the USA Did Google seriously

jeopardize both the control of the Internet by the US and Googles iconic

MISSION STATEMENT:

4. How could the world remain silent when Judge Michael E. Cooper,

from such a small rural American desert town, trampled over the

Constitution, the American Bill of Rights and the sacred right of ALL

individuals, around the globe, to Free Speech and the right of ALL to be

fully and impartially informed all over the free world?

5. How could the world remain silent when Judge Michael E. Cooper,
http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/http://www.lleclezio.blogspot.com/http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/http://www.lleclezio.blogspot.com/


6/53

from such a small rural American desert town, indirectly condones Perjury

- Fraud - Coercion Corruption Intimidation and Blackmail? In so doing,

does the said Judge in essence promote crime by stifling Free Speech and

muting a voice eager to expose an alleged repeat criminal for the better

good of all?

6. The International Court of Appeals, the House of Congress and

the US Senate are hereby asked to find and declare unequivocally that:

Free Speech is sacred to all around the globe including within the United

States of America. Such a Declaration is an absolute must for all peoples

around the globe to have unlimited access to international information in

an impartial manner regardless as to whether the Internet is controlled

by the US or the UN.

7. The global stakes are too high to delay an International ruling

stating clearly that, while the Internet is under US control, NO small town

Judge in the United States of America can ad lib dictate to the

International community which individual from which country is Free to

enjoy his sacred rights to Free Speech and who is not. In this instance, an

individual from the Republic of Mauritius - Africa is supposedly,

according to a reckless court order, no longer entitled to such a sacred

right.


7/53

2. Background History

Solely to protect himself from being exposed to the embarrassing truth, anAmerican individual, Michael L. Darland, ironically, one of the biggest donors to

FreedomWorks in Washington State, America, requested that a Judge from smalltown, USA, should issue a ruling denying Free Speech to Louis Leclezio inMauritius Africa. If allowed to stand, that fatal landmark ruling, could, infact, snowball to affect the right to Free Speech and to Free ImpartialInformation of all world citizens.

Fortunately, that ill thought ruling has served to highlight the looseregulations controlling Free Speech across jurisdictional frontiers in aglobal world while the Internet is controlled by the US.

On October 11, 2011, Free Speech was denied to Louis Leclezio(Residing and

posting on the Internet from The Sovereign Republic of Mauritius) by Judge MichaelE. Cooper. That small desert town Judge casually granted his off the cuffruling to,in effect, deny Free Speech across International frontiers from his bench locatedin the small rural town of Ellensburg (pop. 18,174 in 2010).

In so doing, Judge Michael E. Cooper sent the entire concept of American Freedom,as painted by America and imagined by citizens of the world, outside America,sliding down very slippery slopes. Did that ruling give Freedom and its works ahuge black eye all around the globe?

The rest of the world instantly viewed that ruling as a domineering,

arbitrary and capricious dictatorial order handed down by a small townautocratic Judge imposing HIS despotic will with pleasure upon a globalcommunity aspiring for ever greater freedoms.

Indeed, Judge Michael E. Cooper did trigger a huge snow ball. That huge snow ball,unleashed in America over property on the high Cascade Mountain ski slopes bythe Michael L. Darland and Judge Michael E. Cooper cold and callous story, freezingthe right to Free Speech of people in warm Africa has generated an avalanche oflegal issues, opinions and responses. The ripple effect should keep lapping all overthe shores of the world for some time.

At least, until such time as the International Court of Appeals, The Houseof Congress and The US Senate decree and enacts new legislation to ruleout the possibility that any small time Judge from any small town inAmerica could ever again tar the big image of a Free America world wide

by demonstrating to an African, with pleasure, how Freedom canNOTWorkin Free America.(See Document # 26 P.12 lines 4-11 & P.13 line21)


8/53

3. TABLE OF AUTHORITATIVE DOCUMENTS ESTABLISHING TRUTH

1. Louis Leclezio Sworn Declaration re Michael L. Darland Free Speech My

Property.

2. Michael L. Darland Perjury Highlights.

3. Who is Louis Leclezio by Michael L. Darland.

3a Notarized Mike Moyer's Affidavit 03-01-05. Where was Popp's false Affidavit

in 2005?

4. Michael Darland - Louis Leclezio defined as owners by Darland to Cascade

Land Conservancy

5. Michael L. Darland confirms under oath that Louis Leclezio OWNS the

property in Summary Judgment Motion Document in 2005.

6. Michael L. Darland & Louis Leclezio (Plaintiffs) OWN the Property - Summary

Judgment Decision granted by Judge Michael E. Cooper in 2005.

7. Michael L. Darland - Questionable answers by Darland to Interrogatories

052905.

8. Michael L. Darland and Louis Leclezio Supplemental Memo prepared By

Brian J. Dorsey confirming the Darland Leclezio verbal agreement.

9. Michael L. Darland & Myrna Darland signed Quit Claim Deed July 28 2003.

10.Michael L. Darland - Sequence of mail establishes the fraud perpetrated by

Michael L. Darland and Ellensburg attorney Douglas W. Nicholson on Louis

Leclezio.

11. Michael L. Darland's different truths to fit different agendas.

12.Michael L. Darland - Varying versions of the truth - Compare with subsequent


9/53

Court filings.

12a Michael L. Darland states the property is serviced since 1973 in one forum

and NOT serviced in another venue! (Compare Doc # 12a with

Document # 20 P.7 Para 6.11 lines 5-10)

13. Newspaper reports vary from Darland's version re 1993 Digital

Systems/Darland settlement claims. (Compare Docs #7 P.5 & Doc # 13)

14.Michael L. Darland insists on control. Later blames Leclezio for Darlands

failures.

15.Michael L. Darland - A miser, complains about Douglas W. Nicholsons

exorbitant fees.

16.Michael L. Darland 'compassionate' letter upon hearing Leclezio's cancer has

been confirmed (Compare Doc. # 16 030306 Darland letter with Doc. #

42 Darland 2012 letter.

17.Michael L. Darland - Reply from Louis Leclezio to Darland's 'compassionate'

letter after Leclezio advised his suspected cancer had been confirmed.

18.Louis Leclezio reminds Douglas War Nicholson, attorney Ellensburg, of hisfiduciary obligations towards Louis Leclezio.

19.Michael L. Darland valuations including Leclezio's 26 acres valued by Darland

at a minimum of $7million. Then stolen by Michael L. Darland for $0!

20.Michael L. Darland NOW states under oath that the Darlands alone OWN the

property! (Compare this Document # 20 P. 3 Para 3.5 with Document # 5).

21.Douglas Warr Nicholson Attorney Ellensburg - Can you - Should you ever trust

such a lawyer?

22.Michael L. Darland failed to perform Cross Claim by Louis Leclezio.

23.Washington State Bar Association, in Seattle, finds Michael L. Darland has NO

credibility. The Bar is most polite not to call Michael L. Darland and his star


10/53

witness William Popp, liars.

24.Michael L. Darland appeals the WSBA ruling Michael L. Darland has to deny

Louis Leclezio legal representation to be able to defraud Leclezio of his

property.

25.Washington State Bar Association Appeals Review Board confirms their

earlier ruling against Michael L. Darland.

26.How Michael L. Darland finally 'won' in front of a Judge in a desert country,

rural court, after years of perjury and vile ducking and diving tactics.

27.Contrary to Jeff Slothowers representation to the Court, on October 11, 2011

- All parties HAD Louis Leclezios physical address at least since September

24, 2011.

28.What is a Notarized Affidavit in 2010/2011, 7 & 8 years after the fact, by

William Popp worth? Why was there no such Notarized Affidavit in 2005?

29.Michael L. Darland Memo Takings without Compensation 2004. (Is

sauce for the goose, sauce for the gander?)

30.Michael L. Darland fully understands the transaction in 2005. Where & whenthe shoe fits, in these Thoughts and Comments document by Darland,

Darland must wear that shoe in 2011.

31.Memorandum of Understanding prepared by Darland for Leclezio to sign in

2004.

32. Did Michael L. Darland plan to defraud Leclezio all along?

33.Louis Leclezio Declaration revised and approved by Michael L. Darland in

2005.

34.Michael L. Darland Blue Sky offers to sell encumbered real estate

fraudulently.

35.Michael L. Darland, a fraudster sees Fraud by all & Matters of fact issue when


11/53

convenient.

36.Copy of letter Louis Leclezio sent to Michael L. Darland re unpaid bills 12-30-

04.

37.Trial Brief in 2005. Where is William Popps Notarized Affidavit in support of

that brief?

38.What is W. Popps late Affidavit in 2011 worth against R. Kloss in support of

motion in 2005?

39.What is Popp's 2011 Affidavit worth compared to M. Moyer's one supporting

the 2005 Motion?

39a Notarized Affidavit from Mike Moyer 03-01-05.

40.Settlement Agreement between Michael L. Darland, Louis Leclezio &

Snoqualmie Pass Utility District reached on or about September 29, 2005.

41.Analysis of Kittitas County Court Proceedings held on October 11, 2011.

42. Michael L. Darland Forgiveness letter in April 2012.

43. Google Removals and Correspondence.

44.Brian J. Dorsey Legal Correspondence re Case handling & Issues of Materialfacts.

45. Letter to Judge Cooper re lack of service September 24, 2011.

46. Louis Leclezio Profile.

47. Settlement Proposal.

48. Copy Certified Mail to Judge Cooper.

49. Letter to ITU re Internet control.

50. Attorney Jim McBride confirms thirty minute hearing.

51. Kittitas County Correspondence underscores the case.

4. TABLE OF U.S.A. AND INTERNATIONAL AUTHORITIES


12/53

References re:

1. Freedom of speech in the United StatesFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Freedom of speech in the United Statesis protected by theFirstAmendment to the United States Constitution and by many state constitutions andstate and federal laws.

Criticism of the government and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may finddistasteful or against public policy, such as racism, sexism, and other hate speechare almost always permitted.

In Common Law it is usually a requirement that a reported alleged slander oralleged defamation claim be false.

Note: All information I have published and will continue to disseminate aboutMichael L. Darland on the World Wide Web and thru all other available platforms,can be verified to be TRUE by documents under the long list ofAuthoritative Documents referred to above!

IRONICAL STATEMENT FROM MICHAEL L. DARLAND TO THE PRESS:

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2017409373_superpacs03m.html

What I hope they use it (Darlands $50,000 contribution to FreedomWorks) foris to find people and support people who believe as I do in following ourConstitution," Darland said of his donation. (Emphasis added)

He views Obama as holding a "derogatory" view toward constitutional limits on biggovernment.

Does Michael L. Darland Believe in following the Constitution, only

when Free Speech does not embarrass him and does not expose him tothe truth and likely prosecution?

Thus, according to Michael L. Darland, who, selectively believes in following theConstitution no one located anywhere in the world has any right to criticizeMichael L. Darland and expose him to the truth on the World Wide Web. ButMichael L. Darland can criticize even the First American, President Obama!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitutionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitutionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Constitutionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speechhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Lawhttp://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2017409373_superpacs03m.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitutionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitutionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Constitutionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speechhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Lawhttp://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2017409373_superpacs03m.html


13/53

Incidentally, Mr. Mark Randazza, a First Amendment law expert who is also anintellectual property lawyer and a law professor appears to be very familiar withthe likes of Michael L. Darland. The latter used his money to deny me Free Speechafter causing me irreparable damages for years.

Mr. Randazza handled the Glenn Beck v. Isaac Eiland-Hall case.

The following is what Mr. Randazza had to say commenting generally on theDarlands of this world:

As my career has gone on, Ive seen that often wealthy and powerful people areawfully thin skinned about criticism, and they use their money and powerto attempt to silence the little guy.

However, when that happens, the guy who gets pushed over suffers, but so do allof us. When one citizens constitutional rights are threatened, all of our rights are

threatened, and I am not letting that happen on my watch.

2. Freedom of Speech(redirected from Freedom of Speech (International))

The Framers of the Constitution guaranteed freedom of speech and expression to the citizens of the United Stateswith the First Amendment, which reads, in part, "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom ofspeech." Almost since the adoption of the Bill of Rights, however, the judiciary has **struggled to define speechand expression and the extent to which freedom of speech should be protected.Some, like Justice HUGOL. BLACK,have believed that freedom of speech is absolute. But most jurists, along with most U.S. citizens, agree withJustice OLIVERWENDELLHOLMESJR., who felt that the Constitution allows some restrictions on speech under certain

circumstances. To illustrate this point, Holmes wrote, "The most stringent protection of free speech would notprotect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic" (SCHENCKV. UNITEDSTATES, 249 U.S. 47, 39 S.Ct. 247, 63 L. Ed. 470 [1919]).

3.THE OPEN INTERNET & THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH

Stop Washington from regulating Free Speech & Enterprise

FCC Regulation of the Internet

We are not interested in you asserting your set of values, beliefs and agendas over yet another free form of

information exchange and commerce. Federal regulators and non-elected bureaucrats were never supposed tocontrol and regulate communication and information exchange. Nowhere in the US Constitution are they given any

authority to control or regulate free speech, free enterprise or free information exchange. In fact, it actually sets forth

prohibitions against this.

Freedom is the choice of making good or bad decisions, its messy. Its not supposed to be controlled or molded by

our government or its unelected regulators.

Regulation of the internet will mean the media and the government will no longer have any truly free opinion exchange
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Bill+of+Rightshttp://openinternet.ideascale.com/a/ideafactory.do?discussionID=10095http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Bill+of+Rightshttp://openinternet.ideascale.com/a/ideafactory.do?discussionID=10095


14/53

of an opposing nature. It will hurt American business making us less competitive than we are already. It will hurt and

stifle American citizens who disagree with current party or administration in control, regardless of which party it

happens to be. Finally it will hurt America by continuing to regulate and restrain free speech and making us

less free and less the America we once were. (Emphasis added)

Fulton Sheen

4. TEN PRINCIPLES SHOULD AFFIRM THE PUBLICS RIGHT TOINFORMATION

http://freespeechdebate.com/en/?gclid=COGOyISu-68CFQdb3wod4xWKSw

We are all neighbours now. Through the internet and mobile phones, we can reach four billion other

people. This offers unprecedented chances for free expression.

Timothy Garton Ash

and an international teambased at Oxford University

Invites the International Community To Come Together To write 10principles for global free speech. Click. Discuss. Vote.

Sandra Coliver, senior legal officer at the Open Society Justice Initiative, says the right to information is

essential for freedom of expression.

Defamation laws cannot be used to stifle freedom of expression, people shouldnever be convicted of defamation, if the statement was true, or an honest

opinion published without malice, and/or if its publication was in the publicinterest. (emphasis added)

A published statement or image cannot be defamatory unless it causes substantialharm to the reputation of the individual concerned. Defences against a charge ofdefamation should include: responsible publication on matters of public interest,truth (the statement must be shown to be substantially true) and honestopinion (an honest statement of opinion on a matter of public interest). MichaelL. Darland offering encumbered property, as if it were free and clear of allencumbrances, to the public at large is indeed a matter of urgent public interest toall.

5. FREEDOM OF SPEECH INTERNATIONALLY

REGULATING THE INTERNET WITHOUT DAMAGING FREE
http://freespeechdebate.com/en/?gclid=COGOyISu-68CFQdb3wod4xWKSwhttp://freespeechdebate.com/en/?gclid=COGOyISu-68CFQdb3wod4xWKSw


15/53

SPEECH

http://www.mediapolicy.org/2011/11/regulating-the-internet-without-

damaging-free-speech-a-set-of-recommendations/

Finally, in the case of defamation, jurisdictional regulation must be clarified in the region toavoid uncertainty about applicable law, which could cause self-censorship. Criteria whichgrant jurisdiction to the authors location of residence could minimize negative effectson freedom of expression by guaranteeing the authors right of defense. (Emphasisadded) In addition, free expression can be protected by adopting regulations that prohibitenforcement of foreign judgments contrary to international standards on freedom ofexpression.

5. EXCERPTS FROM OCTOBER 11, 2011 HEARING TRANSCRIPT +COMMENTS

In the case of Louis Leclezio Family et al - Plaintiffs v. Michael & Myrna Darland Donors to Defendants -

Those documents are attached asexhibits under the section .

(See Document #50)

(See Document # 26P. 13 lines 21 & 22)

Indeed, on October 11, 2011, whatever the home town attorney, Jeff Slothower, asked for,from the small town Judge Michael E. Cooper, Jeff Slothower got on behalf of his wealthy outof town client, Michael L. Darland!

But, whatever my out of town and from the big Seattle/Redmond city attorney, James D.McBride asked from Judge Michael E. Cooper on my behalf from poor Africa Judge Cooperdenied outright! (See Document # 26 P.3 lines 1 25; P.4 lines 1 8; P.7 lines 18 25.)
http://www.mediapolicy.org/2011/11/regulating-the-internet-without-damaging-free-speech-a-set-of-recommendations/http://www.mediapolicy.org/2011/11/regulating-the-internet-without-damaging-free-speech-a-set-of-recommendations/http://www.mediapolicy.org/2011/11/regulating-the-internet-without-damaging-free-speech-a-set-of-recommendations/http://www.mediapolicy.org/2011/11/regulating-the-internet-without-damaging-free-speech-a-set-of-recommendations/


16/53

Yet, on October 11, 2011, Ellensburg attorney Jeff Slothower made a plethora of falserepresentations to the Court, among which:

And that as a matter of law statements and internet postings about Mr. andMrs. Darland by Leclezios are inflammatory. (See Document # 26 P. 9 lines 4 6)

Is the inflammatory? Where is the evidence? Where is a single citation by Ellensburgattorney, Jeff Slothower, with reference to the alleged inflammatory posts?

I defy Ellensburg attorney, Jeff Slothower to refer The International Court of Appeals, TheHouse of Congress and the US Senate to a single inflammatory post by me betweenSeptember 25, 2008 and October 11, 2011 concerning Mrs. Myrna Darland. My posts docriticize and do expose Michael L. Darland to the truth for the greater common good of all. Iam convinced that Michael L. Darland is a repeat criminal.

Then paragraph five, I have entered their orders, imposes a permanentinjunction against Mr. Leclezio asking for enjoining and continueddefamatory comments and orders him to remove them, this languagewe believe will once provided with internet to internet search providers allows them toremove this.(See Document # 26 P. 12 lines 5 11)

In Free America, under the American Constitution and Bill of Rights, should it be as simple asthat for a small time judge from small town USA to

Is Judge Michael E. Cooper licensed to sit on a bench in the Supreme Court in theSovereign Republic of Mauritius reported to be in Africa?


17/53

Is Judge Michael E. Cooper from small town America qualified and empowered to legislate inMauritius and sanction Mauritian citizens?

the posts at issue originated from the sovereign Republic of Mauritius reported incourt to be in Africa, outside the borders of America.

But, apparently, Judge Michael E. Cooper was so eager to please his home town crony,Ellensburg attorney Jeff Slothower, that Judge Cooper readily fell into the desert trap laid outfor him by attorney Slothower. Judge Cooper was asked to sign just about any kind of orderby attorney Slothower Judge Cooper obeyed meekly and signed with pleasure! (SeeDocument # 26 P. 13 lines 21 22)

Does anyone wonder why would any Judge sign such a momentous order without any trial andor debate, while affecting across international frontiers with pleasure ? (SeeDocument # 26 P. 13 lines 21 22)

I find it amazing that counsel and Mr. Leclezio who have basically ignored, ifnot thumbed their noses at this Court order since April of this year (See Document # 26 P. 6lines 5 8)

My numerous mails and posts as well as the other statement of Ellensburg attorney JeffSlothower below, belies Slothowers assertion above.

I think the courts well aware that Mr. Leclezio is a prolific E-Mail writer

having sent , myself, Mr. McBride, and myself, anybody else who will listen(SeeDocument 26 P.6 lines 18 21)

That avowal by Slothower and my prolific writing proves overwhelmingly that I neverignored or thumbed my nose at any one, let alone .

Could I help it, if, while sick in Africa and unable to travel to America,, Mr. James McBride

and anybody else who all received E-Mails from me

(See Document 26 P. 6 lines 18 21 & Document # 51)

Yet, all along I desperately wanted to be heard. I provided much hard evidence to back up mystatements. The hard evidence was in the best interest of all.

But, I systematically went unheard.

What a horrible feeling while sick, to have the sentiment that your fate is being decided inabstentia behind your back, behind closed ears and closed doors.


18/53

No one wanted to hear me knocking and knocking again and no one wanted to open the door.No one cared about responding to my desperate screams for help from outside!

The deathly silence increased my awful feeling that my fate was definitely being disposed ofwithout me having any say.

I was being hanged without trial!

Although sick, I was not dead. I was simply unable to travel! Was that why no one wanted tohear me? Or is that the American way of protecting human rights? Kill someones case withouttrial while sick!!!

(After all, was Naffissatou Diallo granted the right to a trial by theNew York Prosecuting Attorney Cyrus R. Vance Jr.?)


19/53

When he filed it he lived in Africa for a number of years. In fact, he went to

Africa and was planning to go to Africa when the agreement was filed.(See Document # 26P. 5 lines 11 13)


20/53

However, just like my attorney, James McBride was not allowed by Judge Michael E. Cooper tomake a key declaration on October 11, 2011 in front of the said judge, I am equally no longerallowed to be heard through the Internet having been denied by the arbitraryand capricious ruling of

(See

Document 26 P. 7 lines 23 25.)

Again and again I ask and will ask: Why was I denied ?

Are they all in Ellensburg, a predominantly white small American community town, tooashamed of their prejudices and flagrant discrimination against me, located supposedly in

Africa? Therefore, the world should not and cannot read what I have to say!

Indeed, according to a news report dated September 17, 2011, Judge Michael E. Coopernotified Washington State Governor Chris Gregoire and Washington State Supreme Court ChiefJustice Barbara Madsen in August 2011 that he would retire from the bench as of October 1,

2011.

Was it specifically to hand over his pre wrapped all encompassing present, for unknownreasons, to his hometown attorney crony, Jeff Slothower?

Prior to reading that news report, I had relied solely on the closing statements of both JudgeMichael E, Cooper and attorney Slothower, as reported in the transcript of the October 11,2011 hearing. I was under the impression that the Judge was to retire at the end of October2011.(See Document 26 P.13 lines 16 22)

But was it because Judge Cooper had specifically come in to sit on the bench on October 11,2011 to grant his very unusual parting gift to his home town crony on that date that the Judgesigned as pro tem? Would the remark by attorney Jeff Slothower: And I realize this is the lasttime Ill appear in front of you. indicate that the judge would only come out of retirementonce to act as Pro Tem for that very special gifting occasion? (See Document 26 P. 13 lines 17& 18)

If that is so, then throughout this Brief and the rest of the documents wherever I may haveerred by making reference to pre retirement it should read: post retirement.


21/53

GOOGLE: Vint Cerf: "The greatest strength of the current system of Internet governance isits meritocratic democracy. Anyone who cares can voice ideas and opinions, but the ultimatedecisions are governed by broad consensus. It might not always be the most convenient ofsystems, but its the fairest, safest, and historically most effective way to ensure that goodideas win out and bad ideas die.

Such a move holds profound and I believe potentially hazardous implications for thefuture of the Internet and all of its users. If all of us do not pay attention to what is going on,users worldwide will be at risk of losing the OPEN and FREE Internet that has brought somuch to so many.

Those are the words spoken by Mr. Vint Cerf who testified before a the Congressionalsubcommittee hearing on Thursday May 31, 2012 at the hearing on the Hill.

In addition, in an op ed in the Wall Street Journal earlier this year, Federal CommunicationsCommission member, Robert McDowell, also warned that some of the countries who belong

to the ITU are interested in restraining the essential freedom of the Internet because it causesproblems for dictatorships and autocracies.

What? Does America want to remain the sole dictatorial and autocratic dictator of the Internetalthough the Internet is a global facility?

OR To make matters even worse, should America empower any kind of an autocratic judgefrom any kind of a small USA town to dictate to the GLOBE what a world citizen can andcannot say and/or read!

Are actions taken by Google in line with the representations of Mr. Vint Cerf at that hearing

and the statements of Mr. Robert McDowell in the Wall Street Journal?

Check out: www.snocadia.blogspot.comand/orwww.truthremldarland.blogspot.com

All it took for Google to remove both blogs referred to above was not a Federal Court orSupreme Court ruling.

But any kind of an order issued by a small time home town judge from the desert town ofEllensburg (Pop.18,174 in 2010). That order affecting Free Speech globally was deliveredwithout trial, in a pre wrapped package that included a number of other issues at the end of ahearing that had lasted a maximum of thirty minutes! (See Document # 50)

From a transcript of the hearing held on October 11, 2011, it appears that such a momentousorder was hastily delivered based solely on the following unverified statements by smallhome town attorney crony Jeff Slothower:

Jeff Slothower: And that as a matter of law statements and internet postings about Mr. andMrs. Darland by Leclezios are inflammatory. (See Document # 26 P. 9 lines 4 6)
http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/


22/53

Then paragraph five, I have entered their orders, imposes a permanentinjunction against Mr. Leclezio asking for enjoining and continueddefamatory comments and orders him to remove them, this languagewe believe will once provided with internet to internet search providers allows them toremove this.(See Document # 26 P. 12 lines 5 11)

(See Document # 43)

I could not travel. I was home bound in supposedly Africa for health and financial reasons. Iwas comforted and I was encouraged by Googles mission statement on the Google site. Itreads:

Granted, I could not travel. But, I rejoiced that, thanks to Google, my words can and will travelfar and wide. I will be heard. Justice will be served for the greater good of all. I posted on

Blogger. I uploaded supporting documents on Scribd.

Now, that they were finally reading me in America, because they knew others were alsoreading me around the world, it could not and would not be for long.


23/53

Ironically, as mentioned above, that momentous ruling denying me potentiallyaffecting the rights of all around the world, to easily accessible,

was dictated to the mighty Google Empire by a small time Judge from smalltown USA without trial within less than half an hour. Yet, thats all it took for Google to bebamboozled and for its Mission Statement jeopardized.

If and when, in real life, the mighty Google empire can be ridiculed any how by any small timeJudge from any small town in America? And the

(See Document # 43 Googles Notices and mycomments speak for themselves.)

Should Google be concerned? Apparently not! I received NO reply from Google to mycomments! Is Google NOT concerned because the Internet is under crony US control?

Is it not clear that Google does not walk the talk?

If Mr. Cerf actually meant what he told the Congressional subcommittee hearing on ThursdayMay 31, 2012, then:


24/53

Again I ask: How much worse could the UN control of the Internet be? Has Google stuck itshead in the sand simply because a small time judge from small town USA has decreed that Ishould have no voice and the world should have no right to impartial information?

the fairest, safest, and historically most effective way to ensure thatgood ideas win out and bad ideas die.

Is that what Mr. Vint Cerf calls: the and Internet that has brought so much to somany.

Is it not a wonder, how that small time, pro tem Judge from that small town in Americacould achieve during a marathon hearing, in less than thirty minutes, through an offthe cuff order, what China failed to do over months?

That is to force Google, without trial or due process, to cower down docilely and toallow itself to be muzzled up as far as my International right to Free Speech throughthe Google platform is concerned while automatically compromising the availability ofimpartial information accessible to all through the Google platform.


25/53


26/53

7. MAIN STREET MATTERS


27/53

QUESTIONS JURORS, CONGRESS AND THE SENATE MIGHT ASK:

Before Google elected to submit passively and obediently to such an apparently ill thought, offthe cuff ruling from a small time Judge from small town America without a trial;

Before Judge Michael E. Cooper chose to deny me the right to through an arbitrary and off

the cuff, ruling, should the Judge have at the very least tried the case, debated andresearched expert opinion and precedent case law, if any, with respect to the following:

1. What are the jurisdictional boundaries of Judge Michael E. Cooper with regards toInternational rights toWhat was my main purpose for disseminating truthful information well backed up bysupporting documents concerning Michael L. Darland?

3. What are the likely consequences of denying to a responsible worldcitizen alerting the public about an alleged repeat criminal likely to strike again andagain?

4. Could such an order denying me in the interest of the common good ofall be construed by an alleged repeat criminal as a to go on committingcrime?

Can the entire October 11, 2011 hearing in small town USA in front of Judge Michael E. Cooperever be considered to be a well thought out and in America?

attorney

I believe the court should make in an order to comply with CR 54 and there be no just reason


28/53

for delay, which would require Mr. Leclezio to appeal this matter within the 30 day period fromtoday. (See Document # 26 P. 9 lines 15 19)

And then again, So, your Honor, with entry of that order, its myunderstanding if I need to serve Mr. Leclezio in the future I can simply deposit a copy with the

clerk? Right. Pursuant to Court rule. (See Document # 26 P.13 lines 11 15)

So, Your honor, with entry of that order, then its my understanding if Ineed to serve Mr. Leclezio in the future I can simply deposit a copy with the clerk!

Right, pursuant to Court rule.(See Document 26 P.13 lines 11 15)

Although both the court and attorney Slothower had my home address on file and

! (SeeDocuments # 45 & 48)

Excerpt from September 24, 2011 letter addressed to Judge Cooper et al:

Dear most Honorable Judge Cooper,

Would you please issue an order that all documents produced or filed with the Court in thiscase since December 21, 2010 be made available to me in due form before this case canproceed.

I could only open the small 30.6 KB doc attached by McBride as my slow dial up connectiondoes not allow me to open the 13.5 MB file also attached among others.


29/53

In the absence of a legal representative in America at present,(emphasis added) I will be back at my usual home address: Louis Leclezio,

Allee Tamarin, Rodrigues Island via The Republic of Mauritius on or about January 31, 2012.(See Documents # 45 & 48 Letter to Judge Cooper re Lack of service & my certified mailreceipt.)

(See document # 48 My Certified Mail Receipt of Letter sentto Judge Cooper)

Before that rural court tries to absolve itself by claiming that it could not afford the postage,

the court should consider how much more it pays out in messenger fees to serve Americancitizens across America.

It is important for me to point out that I received the transcript of the October 11, 2011hearing thanks to Google acting as messenger for the Kittitas County Court on April 20, 2012only.

I am not an attorney. I am sick. But I assume my responsibilities nonetheless. Therefore,through sheer ardent desire for a fair trial and to see justice finally prevail, I have mustered allof the little strength that I have left to put together this trial brief within approximately 50days!

My prolific writing should attest to the fact that it has never been in my nature toanything or to at anyone. From the cradle, I have been taught to assumemy responsibilities.

I am still at the disposal of anyone and all to answer any further questions.

Furthermore, depending on the ups and downs of my health, I am available for videoconferences through iPad at short notice.

In order to describe your interest in this case and/or to set up an appointment please kindly e-mail: [email protected]

I acknowledge that I am not an attorney. If an attorney, well versed in internationallaws is interested in preparing an additional professional brief to be presented to other

forums of choice, I would welcome discussing the opportunity.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]


30/53

I further acknowledge that I may be fifteen days or so late in filing this appeal. From April 20,2012 when I received the transcript of the October 11, 2011 hearing to date, 50 days haveelapsed.

I hope and pray that the International Court of Appeals, the House of Congress and the US

Senate will show some compassion and consideration towards me for not having been able tofile this appeal

Additionally, please note that according to Jewel Smith, the Kittitas County Court reporter, thetranscript of the hearing was only completed on January 3, 2012. That is 84 days after theOctober 11, 2011 hearing!

In turn that transcript was only served upon me on April 20, 2012 by Google acting as Kittitas

County Court messenger. That is 190 days after the October 11, 2011 hearing. Yet I wassupposed to have 30 days only from October 11, 2011 to appeal a decision indirectly madeknown to me a full 190 days later! (See Document # 26 P.14 line 10)

In mitigation for granting me some additional time, will the International Court of Appeals, theHouse of Congress and the US Senate please consider that I have undergone three cancerrelated surgeries since March 14, 2006. The latest being on March 30, 2012. I have had chemotherapy treatment ending in July 2006 and began suffering from heart problems since October2006. I have been taking Cordarone and Warfarin since a stay in ICU in April 2009.

Since May 18, 2012, I am on Vastarel and Stemetil to control acute vertigo problems caused bycancer related ear surgery on March 30, 2012.

It has definitely not been easy putting this Trial Brief together within such a short time startingfrom April 20, 2012 only twenty days after my latest surgery during my convalescence. Butmay it testify to my determination, my perseverance and my conviction that

8. INTERNATIONAL AND WASHINGTON STATE LAW PROVISIONS

Under International and Washington State laws, are perjury, fraud, coercion, corruption,tampering with witnesses, suppression of intimidation and blackmail consideredcrimes?


31/53

Are such crimes punishable by law internationally and in Washington State?Under the list of Authoritative Documents, are documents # 5 - # 6 - # 6a # 9 - # 11 - #12 - # 12a - # 20 - # 22 - # 23 - # 26 - # in case # 04 2 00411 2 still on file and ofPublic record in Kittitas County Superior Court?

OR

Has the file in case # 04 2 00411 2 in Kittitas County Superior Court also beenconveniently sealed since the October 11, 2011 hearing, just like the docket in King CountySuperior Court in the case against Michael L. Darland personally and Digital Systems involvingallegations of fraud was sealed in 1993 as a condition of an $8 million settlement beingreached by Michael L. Darland allegedly to avoid being charged criminally?

ORHas the entire file in case # 04 2 00411 2 in Kittitas County Superior Court or havedocuments therein magically disappeared through Orders from Judge Michael E. Cooper afterretiring or otherwise?On the other hand, if all above mentioned documents , is theKittitas County Public Prosecutor not duty bound to look through the files in case # 04 2 00411 2, to locate the appropriate documents mentioned throughout this Trial Brief, whereperjury, coercion and fraud are glaringly evident and to file the appropriate charges against allthose who have committed such crimes or served as accomplices thereto?

If and when a Public Prosecutor is made aware of crimes committed within his jurisdiction, isthe Public Prosecutor duty bound to investigate all such crimes reported to him? Especially so,when the said crimes can easily be verified through the County Courts public records?ORShould the Public Prosecutor ignore such reports and put the public at risk by allowing analleged repeat criminal, Michael L. Darland, to go on committing more crimes involving moreperjury, more coercion, more corruption, more intimidation, more blackmail and more fraud tothe detriment of the general public?


32/53

9. PLEADINGS

The Louis Leclezio Family et al respectfully asks THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OFAPPEALS, The HOUSE OF CONGRESS AND THE US SENATE TO DECLARE:

1. That Freedom of Speech is sacred for all around the globe regardless of color, creedor origin.

2. That Freedom of Speech cannot be denied to someone residing in Africa in adiscriminatory, arbitrary and capricious manner without trial or due process by anyJudge located anywhere in the United States of America.

3. That Freedom of Speech policies cannot be dictated to Internet Servers all over theglobe by any small time judge, Michael E, Cooper, from any small town, Ellensburg,(Pop. 18,174 in 2010) in this instance, lost somewhere in the Eastern Washingtondesert of the United States of America.

4. That a small time Judge from Small Town, America, cannot privilege the right of

American citizens to unwarranted protection while such American citizens irreparablydamage others in the world by denying them their sacred right to expose their side ofthe story.

5. That Freedom of Speech cannot be considered sacred by America and Google in thecase of China, but be desecrated by America and Google in other parts of the FreeWorld Republic of Mauritius Africa in this case.

6. That the U.S. Congress and Senate be therefore asked to review and revise U.S. lawsregarding the global governance of Internet Search Engines. Jurisdictionalregulations must be clarified regarding all regions to avoid uncertainty aboutapplicable law, which could cause self-censorship.

7. That small time U.S. Judges from any Small Town, U.S.A. should not be allowed to

discriminate and affect the right of any individual to Free Speech and to impartialinformation internationally regardless of color, creed or origin.

8. That, per all hard evidence contained in the long list of authoritative documents,Michael L. Darland and any and all of his accomplices were at no time defamed sinceall the information disseminated by Louis Leclezio could easily be verified to be trueand factual. And such information was disseminated for the greater good of all.

9. That Michael L. Darland and his accomplices, if any, be found guilty of perjury, fraud,coercion, intimidation and blackmail and that Michael L. Darland and his accomplices, ifany, be charged accordingly in the public interest.

10.That Michael L. and Myrna Darland owe and must deliver, as agreed, to LouisLeclezio, the 26 acres that Leclezio bargained for as consideration and in exchange to

assign to the Darlands for $750,000 only his interest in the balance of the 76 acreSnocadia property together with a $492,781.37 value (at cost) paid in assessments byLeclezio and Miller for water and sewer hook ups and in addition a standing timbervalue worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. The combined property value ofthe Leclezio and Darland 76 acre property was estimated by Darland on October24, 2005 at between $23 million and $92 million! (See Doc. # 19)

11.That Ellensburg attorney Douglas W. Nicholson be found to have been thoroughlyunethical in preferring one client over another and to have also made false statements


33/53

in various e-mails. That attorney, Douglas Warr Nicholson, be therefore judged unfit topractice law and also liable vis--vis Leclezio for irreparable damages suffered byLeclezio due to attorney Nicholson abusing his position of trust. (See Documents #s 10

14 18 21 to name but a few.)

10. CONCLUSION

All of the equities in this case favor plaintiffs and the facts established at trial will hopefully

convince the International Court of Appeals to enter a just, fair and equitable finding in favor

of plaintiffs as allowed by law. May the House of Congress and the US Senate enact

urgent laws to protect the humanitarian rights of all, all over the world to Free Speech

and freely accessible impartial information.

REFERENCES:

11. EXCERPTS FROM A FEW PAST POSTS

Post April 9, 2011 Title:

This post deserves to be read in its entirety. It tells part of the story.

Indeed, I believe that due to the compelling and uncontroverted hard evidence, charges ofcorruption, fraud and perjury against Michael L. Darland will stick.

Note that in 2007 Darland was offering to the public encumbered land for sale which he didnot own free and clear and could not have delivered.

At any and all cost, the truth deserves to be widespread in order to safeguard the welfare ofall.

If I succeed to prevent Michael L. Darland from defrauding, corrupting & ruining just onemore person, my efforts and my courageous violation of a restraining order sought by Darlandto help conceal the truth about him will all have been well worth it regardless of any personalcost to me.

To all parties concerned, I hope you find this Brief helpful in your dealings with Michael L.Darland. Yours truly, Louis Leclezio.
http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/2011/04/open-letter-with-some-modifications.htmlhttp://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/2011/04/open-letter-with-some-modifications.html


34/53

Post April 25, 2011 Title:

Addressed to: The Honorable Judge Michael E. Cooper,

Jim McBride,

Jeff Slothower,

Douglas W. Nicholson Ellensburg Attorney.

Yet, the overwhelming, compelling and glaring evidence in support of the of allinformation disseminated by me concerning criminal acts committed by Michael L. Darland canbe confirmed after a thorough examination of the Exhibits that can be found on myhttp://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/ dated April 9, 2011.Let the evidence speak for itself.

If, through my courageous dissemination of the truth about Michael L. Darland, I succeed to

prevent Michael L. Darland from defrauding, corrupting & ruining just one more persons life,

my efforts should an ill advised restraining order, ever be granted, will have been well worth

it regardless of any personal cost to me. (emphasis added)

Judge Michael E. Cooper should seriously consider granting me a Permanent Order to go ondisseminating such valuable, factual and truthful information to the public at large

Post July 24, 2011 Title:Michael L. Darland,

Bellevue, WA. sets himself up to add another failure to his already

impressive list of failures.

A desperate Michael L. Darland is now looking to the Court to deprive the public of thebenefits of the truth.

The most Honorable Judge Michael E. Cooper Kittitas County Superior Court and relevantparties.

In 1993 Mike Darland was sued for fraudulently inflating the stock price of Digital SystemsInc. of Redmond, WA.

As the case evolved, Michael L Darland set himself up to face additional personal charges of
http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/2011/07/michael-l-darland-bellevue-wa-sets.htmlhttp://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/2011/07/michael-l-darland-bellevue-wa-sets.htmlhttp://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/2011/07/michael-l-darland-bellevue-wa-sets.htmlhttp://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/2011/04/michael-l-darland-bellevue-washington.htmlhttp://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/2011/04/michael-l-darland-bellevue-washington.htmlhttp://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/2011/04/michael-l-darland-bellevue-washington.htmlhttp://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/2011/07/michael-l-darland-bellevue-wa-sets.htmlhttp://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/2011/07/michael-l-darland-bellevue-wa-sets.htmlhttp://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/2011/07/michael-l-darland-bellevue-wa-sets.html


35/53

perjury, coercion and corruption.

Be it as it may, Darland, through his attorney Slothower, is again resorting to anothermeans of muzzling me up and

The harder it is to argue the truth away, the more so, the general public has a right to know from the likes of such dangerous repeat criminals.

In a country where foreigners, especially from Africa, are becoming increasingly used to see

some lawyers auctioning their conscience to the highest bidder

In a justice system where enough money can supposedly whitewash any criminal

In a country where perverted attorneys can either get cases dismissed by Judges or public

prosecutors at their clients attorneys whim

In a country where money serves to turn victims into criminals against whom sanctions can

be obtained ad lib to conceal the truth, nothing should come as a surprise.

As I have already stated previously,

by Michael L. Darland of Bellevue WA.,

Post August 5, 2011 Title:

On April 28, 2011, you wrote a letter to Jim McBride. In your letter you state:

when

Mr. Darland attended a business meeting with individuals he did not have an existingrelationship with, who indicated they had googled him and the first thing that came up was

the Snocadia blogspot.

Please refer to my mail to you where I specifically provided you with the address of my blogon April 25, 2011. In that mail I referred you to my blog no less than 4 times!

I fail to understand why you would pretend to the Court that you only became aware of theblogspot in the middle of last week when Mr. Darland attended a business meeting?

However I was delighted to learn that
http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/2011/08/to-jeff-slothower-re-michel-l-darland.htmlhttp://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/2011/08/to-jeff-slothower-re-michel-l-darland.html


36/53

My Comment in May 2012: The same, main objective of my posts is often repeated and verypointed over months. The information I disseminated and will continue to publish aboutMichael L. Darland is true. The statements can be easily verified. The purpose is for the greatergood of all.

I wish someone had warned me about that rascal before I met him.

from Michael L. Dalands ruthlessclutches.

For, only

Instead of the Court docket being sealed from public view in exchange for $8 million(eight million dollars) plundered from corporate coffers by Michael L. Darland, Michael L.Darland had been sent to jail for fraud, perjury, coercion and corruption in 1993, Michael L.Darland could not have defrauded again.

Post August 6, 2011 Title: Michael L.

Darland - Contempt of Court.

It is addressed to:

The most Honorable Judge Michael E. Cooper Kittitas County Superior Court.

Jeff Slothower of Lathrop, Winbauer, Harel, Slothower & Denison LLP. of Ellensburg, WA.

Jim McBride of Julin & McBride Redmond WA.

Brian J. Dorsey of Snohomish County Public Prosecutors office.

Douglas Warren Nicholson, Ellensburg attorney.

Dan Mallove, Attorney for Snoqualmie Pass Utility District.

Myrna Darland Michael L. Darlands e-mail address is unknown.

The above post is well worth reading in its entirety. It presents and confirms what is the wholecase about.
http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/2011/08/michael-l-darland-contempt-of-court_06.htmlhttp://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/2011/08/michael-l-darland-contempt-of-court_06.htmlhttp://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/2011/08/michael-l-darland-contempt-of-court_06.htmlhttp://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/2011/08/michael-l-darland-contempt-of-court_06.html


37/53

Post August 20, 2011 Title:

Dear Honorable Judge Cooper,

Michael L. Darland proposed to file pleadings on July 25, 2011 asking the Kittitas CountySuperior Court to find me in Contempt of Court. What was the outcome of those pleadings ifever filed? If not Why not?

My comment in May 2012: I received NO answer.

by the Judge Michael E. Cooper. Let the Kittitas County Superior Court notdiscriminate against me just because I am alleged to be from Africa.

I am forced to live temporarily away from the US because in my country,health care and all medication is totally free. Michael L. Darland knows this fully

well. Darland has contacted me numerous times in

Using my temporary forced absence, as yet another vile opportunistic ploy to delay/deny mejustice, Michael L. Darland is now proposing to depose me on August 29, 2011.

My comment in May 2012: Are all those letters addressed to Judge Michael E. Cooper fromsomeone who is sick, but nonetheless makes the effort to communicate with the Court, and allrelevant parties, indicative of someone who ignores and thumbs his nose at the Court asEllensburg attorney Jeff Slothower would falsely represent to the Court on October 11, 2011?(See Document # 26 P.6 lines 5 -7)

OR

Was it the other way round? Were Judge Michael E. Cooper and all relevant parties ignoringand thumbing their noses at me? Was it by concerted design and strictly for selfish reasonsof their own?
http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/2011/08/judge-michael-e-cooper-kittitas-county.htmlhttp://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/2011/08/judge-michael-e-cooper-kittitas-county.htmlhttp://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/2011/08/judge-michael-e-cooper-kittitas-county.html


38/53

The exhibits below as well as contradictory statements made under penalty of perjury filed byMichael L. Darland with the Kittitas County Superior Court and the WSBA establish beyond anydoubt that Michael L Darland is a repeat criminal.

(May 2012 addition: Obviously in the publics best interest.)

The above are excerpts from my www.snocadia.blogspot.com between April 9, 2011 andAugust 20, 2011 prior to Judge Michael E. Cooper ordering on October 11, 2011 that all myposts, pictures and intellectual property be removed by Google!

On October 11, 2011, Ellensburg attorney Jeff Slothower had represented to Judge Michael E.Cooper that my posts were inflammatory!

Unfortunately, to my knowledge, attorney Slothower failed to cite a single inflammatory

example. Apparently, he did not have to. The post retirement, pre wrapped gift package fromJudge Cooper had apparently been pre arranged to be delivered by pro tem Judge Michael E.Cooper with pleasure.

After I was notified by Google acting as messenger for Kittitas County Superior Court that mywww.snocadia.blogspot.com site had been removed, I began posting underwww.truthremldarland.blogspot.com . But that site would also be removed within days!

The following are a few excerpts from my posts under www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com :

www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com Post April 21, 2012 Title: Why Is Michael L.

Darland aka Mike Darland (Bellevue, WA.) so desperate to urgently conceal the truth?
http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/http://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/http://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/http://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/2012/04/why-is-michael-l-darland-aka-mike.htmlhttp://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/2012/04/why-is-michael-l-darland-aka-mike.htmlhttp://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/http://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/http://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/http://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/2012/04/why-is-michael-l-darland-aka-mike.htmlhttp://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/2012/04/why-is-michael-l-darland-aka-mike.html


39/53

My suspicions that Jim McBride was overwhelmed dealing with all of Brians files andeventually had to withdraw from the case have been confirmed by Google acting as KittitasCounty Court Messenger and attaching a copy of the Court proceedings dated October 11,2011 to me only yesterday, April 20,2012.

The well documented evidence published on www.snocadia.blogspot.com was far to damningfor Michael L. Darland, the retiring Judge Michael E. Cooper and attorney Douglas W. Nicholsonto have to live with it!

The removal of my blog www.snocadia.blogspot.com is a filthy hoax perpetrated on thepublic. One that grants Michael L. Darland a license to go on defrauding people unpunished!What a black eye for the retiring Judge Michael E. Cooper of Kittitas County Superior Court onlydays before stepping down from the bench after a long carrier!

If there is any semblance of Justice and Truth left out there in North America, I demand, fromAfrica, that my www.snocadia.blogspot.com be reinstated immediately so the whole world canbe Judge.

It is only if and when Darland succeeds to kill me that the public at large will stop seeing myposts about criminal Michael L. Darland reappearing

by that repeat criminal.

On September 23, 2008, I started publishing a blog www.snocadia.blogspot.com. I haveinvested much time developing intellectual property including precious photos, creating articlesand attaching those photos to the articles published on that blog.

On April 19, 2012, Google advised me that they had arbitrarily removed my blog pursuant to acourt order.
http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/http://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/2012/04/michael-l-darland-glories-in-his.htmlhttp://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/http://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/2012/04/isnt-it-interesting-how-freedomworks-in.htmlhttp://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/2012/04/isnt-it-interesting-how-freedomworks-in.htmlhttp://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/2012/04/isnt-it-interesting-how-freedomworks-in.htmlhttp://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/


40/53

Note that all the documents that I had posted on Scribd and had provided links to, were alsoarbitrarily removed by Google, although many of those documents are already of publicrecord in Kittitas County Superior Court.Does such removal by Google raise another more interesting question?

Since All my posts originated from the Sovereign Island of Mauritius would Google feelcompelled to reinstate my blog pursuant to a Court order issued, not by a small time, small UScountry town (population 18,174) judge Michael E. Cooper of Kittitas County Court but issuedby the Chief Judge of Mauritius?

Note that the Chief Judge of Mauritius has met Presidents from China, Asia, Europe and Africaand he is widely respected worldwide.

Should such a made to order order by Judge Michal E. Cooper be allowed to affect the rightsof Americans and those of the whole world to know and to judge where the Truth lies?

In a world, I am prepared to pit my information against Michael L. Darlandsfiction films any time anywhere.

But, is it fair to the rest of the world to restrict FREE SPEECH to Michael L. Darland whilelocking my truths away and denying the public the right to know and to judge?

Is that how FreedomWorks? And works for whom in America?

Does freedom of speech only work for those who, like Mike Darland have donated $50,000 to?

No thanks, to Judge Michael E. Cooper if the American public cannot be cautioned through anumber of Buyer Beware articles and judge for itself where the truth lies.
http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/


41/53

But I am a stickler for fairness, Truth and Justice.

I will fight to the death for the above.

However, having undergone my 3rd surgery, in six years, I am not healthy enough yet to cometo the US to fight Darland.

In a universal world, in My country, Mauritius, My people do not expect me to be muted outby a small time judge, Michael E. Cooper from a small country town, Ellensburg, population18,174 in 2010.

Is that fair? Is that how Google lives up to its mission statement as stated above?

Is fast expanding Africa only a part of Googles universe when convenient to make money?

How can possiblywork when Michael L. Darland is compelled to restrictto his side of the story by any and all means?

Understandably, well founded becomes intolerable when shame is a directconsequence thereof.

Honest men are naturally and happy thru virtuous conduct.

Treacherous men are by their own dishonest desires.

Greed and money obsession leads to all kinds of crippling and tormenting evil.
http://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/http://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/2012/04/google-policy-re-michael-l-darland.htmlhttp://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/2012/04/google-policy-re-michael-l-darland.htmlhttp://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/http://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/2012/04/wow-myrna-darland-wife-of-michael-l.htmlhttp://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/2012/04/wow-myrna-darland-wife-of-michael-l.htmlhttp://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/2012/04/wow-myrna-darland-wife-of-michael-l.html


42/53

The God given crown of the virtuous in their old age is their childrens children.(Lord, thank you for spoiling me with 5 children and 23 grandchildren while 1 more is on the way!)

Now, if Darland is truly convinced that he did nothing wrong, then he should allow himself tobe exposed to the truth contained in the documents I keep re-posting on the web each time

Darland has them hacked in or removed.

While relentlessly continuing to expose Michael L. Darland to the truth we will pray for peaceand justice to eventually set him free thru repentance and facing that same TRUTH.

It is also shameful that Michael L. Darland, with so much financial wealth chooses to spend somuch time and so much money feeding lawyers fighting to defend his lies.

In so doing, Michael L. Darland underscores the saying: Truth hurts

Mike rarely admits he was wrong about anything.

In all fairness, it should be noted that Michael L. Darland is no stranger at coercing falseAffidavits from his star witnesses.

Isn't that why Michael L. Darland insisted that the files in the fraud case against Michael L.Darland personally and Digital Systems (1993) be sealed in King County Superior Court as partof an $8 million dollar settlement by Darland?

After considering the Notarized Affidavit of William Popp, the manner in which the one party,one way hearing was conducted and what a fool Michael L. Darland made of retiring JudgeMichael E. Cooper, is it a wonder that none of them ever want to be shamed now by the factspublished all over the web about this scandalous and outright immoral case in front of such aKangaroo court?

Is it a wonder that Judge Cooper granted a hurried cease and desist order requesting thatGoogle, Blogger and Scribd remove all public information and documents affecting thecredibility of Judge Michael E. Cooper and his cronies, attorneys Douglas Nicholson & JeffSlothower of Ellensburg?

On April 3, 2012, Michael L. Darland wrote to me a letter in effectmore designed to intimidate and blackmail me into silence than to forgive. In his
http://www.truthremldarland.blogspot.com/http://truthremldarland.blogspot.com/2012/04/what-is-notarized-affidavit-from.htmlhttp://truthremldarland.blogspot.com/2012/04/what-is-notarized-affidavit-from.htmlhttp://truthremldarland.blogspot.com/2012/04/what-is-notarized-affidavit-from.html


43/53

letter with a new twist, Darland asserts:

There is nothing that you can write or say that would cause anyone who knows me and myfamily that would ever cause them to believe your words. So all of the untruths that you writeabout me you write to effect future judgments of you by your maker.(See Document # 42 P.

5)

Yet, by April 20, 2012 Darland had seen to it that my right to through theGoogle international platform had been denied and all my posts exposing Michael L. Darland tothe truth had been removed!

Even two posts on my www.lleclezio.blogspot.com blog, dating as far back as November 9,2008 and May 30, 2011, had to be also removed.

The May 30, 2011 article was published on www.lleclezio.blogspot.com by me, a loving grandpa, on the occasion of my first grand daughter graduating from high school. According to

Michael L. Darland, that articlehad to be torn down on May 1, 2012 by Google acting onDarlands instructions.

Yet, that article had made my first grand child, one of 23, shed tears of joy as Kaitlyn calledto thank me profusely.

But apparently that same article made Michael L. Darland cry tears of anger because it casthim for who he truly is.

In that article I wrote:

I wish I were there to see you graduate. A quick visit to my blog: www.snocadia.blogspot.comwill instantly reveal how I have done my utmost to obtain justice and redress in time to befinancially able to be by your side, regardless of the risks to my health, on your graduation day.With the money due to me, I could well afford to take some risks.

But, obstructing justice through any number of vile tactics has empowered Michael L Darlandof Bellevue, Wa. to inflict yet another irreparable damage upon our family life.

(Apparently, that single comment was all it took for Michael L. Darland to cause Google toremove that lengthy post, packed with emotion, love and admiration for my grand daughter!)

In turn, in college, Kaitlyn loved to share her proud grand pas post with her friends atGonzaga University. Now, no thanks, to Michael L. Darland, Kaitlyn can no longer do that. (Seelleclezio post # 2 in posts folder))
http://www.lleclezio.blogspot.com/http://www.lleclezio.blogspot.com/http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.lleclezio.blogspot.com/http://www.lleclezio.blogspot.com/http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/


44/53


45/53

12.COLLECTION of ALL PAST POSTS:

See Section POSTS.

13. NOTICES FROM GOOGLE & CORRESPONDENCE

See Document # 43

14. REMARKS SPECIFIC TO THE HOUSE OF CONGRESS AND US SENATE.

What I hope they use it(Darlands $50,000 contribution to for is to findpeople and support

Darland said of his donation.


46/53

Has Michael L. Darland ever made such significant donations to Republican Party causes in thepast?

So why are Michael L. and Myrna Darland making such a major sudden donation toin 2011?

And why are they making a major donation now?

Again many who know Michael L. Darland have heard him state unequivocally in the past thatcampaign donations are a waste of money.

So why the sudden change of mind?

Why was the Michael L. Darland gift made using Myrna Darland as an intermediary?

Is Michael L. Darland indirectly making such meaningful donations to the Republican Partythrough vanity and only to be in the limelight?

Virtually concurrently, is Michael L. Darland having all traces of my embarrassing postsexposing him to the naked truth and possible prosecution urgently removed in April 2012, just

because Darland is an alleged psychopathic paranoid who needs to meticulously and constantlywhite wash his self tarred image?

Or

In his old age, could Michael L. Darland be aspiring to some glorifying post in Washington DC?

Through his old contacts in Washington DC, is Michael L. Darland lobbying for a nominationthere in return for his indirect donation to should the Republican Party comein?

Would that better explain why, all of a sudden in 2012, Michael L. Darland, becomes so veryparanoid about any article that could jeopardize any potential Darland appointment toWashington DC and his clearance by the House of Congress and the U.S. Senate?


47/53

15. SPECIAL TRIBUTE TO EXEMPLARY SEATTLE/REDMONDATTORNEY:

JAMES D. McBRIDE.

This Trial Brief would not be complete without paying a highlydeserved and very special:

Tribute to Seattle/Redmond exemplary attorney: JimMcBride.

At a hearing held in front of Judge Michael E. Cooper in Kittitas County Court,Ellensburg on October 11, 2011 Mr. Jim McBride confirmed to me, once more,while I was sick, unable to travel and thousands of miles away, just what kind ofa compassionate, smart, refined, noble and thorough gentleman James McBride,

Esq. is.

On October 11, 2011, it took only one short statement from that well knownhighly respected Seattle/Redmond attorney, Jim McBride, to say it all about hisoutstanding character.Jim McBride: Mr. Leclezio should not be punished for my neglect. I dont knowif it is the family break up or my health problems which contributed or causedthis situation.(See document # 26 P. 3 lines: 6 9)

This is obviously an exemplary lawyer who goes beyond the call of duty

to assume, his responsibilities and his perceived fiduciary obligationstowards his client.

James D. McBride does so regardless of the possible consequences forhim or the circumstances surrounding his person that led to theunfortunate turn of events that resulted in Jim being faced with such asad situation!


48/53

I was absolutely distraught when I read the transcript of that fatal October 11,2011 hearing. I saw it for the first time at the end of April 2012 thanks to Googlewho acted as the Kittitas County Court messenger and made the transcript ofthat hearing finally available to me.

When I read Jims statement above, I choked up with tears. In an instant, I betterunderstood the magnitude of Jims most noble character. At any personal cost tohim, Jim always looks out for the best for others and never puts himself ahead!

On October 11, 2011, what a great lesson Jim gave to all involved inthis case through the very few words, he was ever allowed to voice atthat hearing.

Unfortunately, I believe that too often in life, when fine pearls are cast in front ofa malign audience, they are wasted. To be heard and understood by a bunch ofmismatched listeners one should be able to go down to their level.

Jim McBride would not know how to lower himself below his comfort zones andlower himself to those below the belt levels. I am not as noble as Jim and I donot mind doing it when it is called for, as in this case.

The reply from attorney Jeff Slothower, from the small desert town of Ellensburg(Pop. 18, 174 in 2010) was also just as telling.

Jeff Slothower: If Mr. McBride has a problem with the way he has handled thiscase, its not for the court to solve it.(See document # 26 P. 6 line 10 12}

And again!

Jeff Slothower:He can deal with Leclezios in his malpractice carriers if thatswhere he feels he is, but that should not be done at my clients prejudice. (SeeDocument # 26 P. 7 lines 8 10)

How harsh, callous and heartless could Jeff Slothower and thecompliant Judge Cooper be with pleasure? (See Document # 26 P. 13lines 21 & 22)

Even more to the point, just how typical were Slothower and Cooper of

that breed of sharks that project their bad image over the legalprofession.

In that desert town Court room on October 11, 2011, there could be NO room forany understanding or compassion shown to the sick. To a 72 year old attorneywith a brilliant and faultless career who, although also stricken with cancer, hadnonetheless made the effort to drive for over two hours to be in the desert townof Ellensburg on that day!


49/53


50/53

Document # 23)

But, in the small desert town of Ellensburg, once those country cowboys feltthey had lassoed, the big time, big city, noble attorney, Jim McBride, simplybecause he was horribly sick and down on the ground, they could not afford to

let go and give Jim McBride a second stab at justice through a fair trial.

That goes to show just how sordid the Michael L. Darland case was.

On October 11, 2011, Jim McBride was wounded and ill. The famished and wilddesert coyotes were at his heels. Darland, Slothower and Cooper were howlingin concert ready for their repugnant kill. They had smelt blood and they werestanding ready to lap it up. Never ever expecting some day, to have toface the Hill! But, they will.

Throughout the Trial Brief, The International Court of Appeals, the House of

Congress and the US Senate will realize that on October 11, 2011, Ellensburgattorney, Jeff Slothower got all he asked for in a pre wrapped package.

To top it all, it was presented to Slothower with pleasure by the retired JudgeMichael E. Cooper who had, for obvious reasons of his own, dealt away any dueprocess and/or trial!

But, is it also not equally evident that Slothower, will never ever have anyhonesty or class?

Those qualities come from the cradle. And no Judge can hand those down,

especially not from a stenched up bench.

On October 11, 2011, Jim McBride lost but, in my mind, the giant that Jim is,stood very tall as he dwarfed the rest of them in Court on that day.

As for the cheap shots concerning malpractice carriers fired at Mr. James D.McBride by Slothower, I thank God that my attorney is not a bird of that feather.Neither am I.

Unlike Michael L. Darland, I am neither possessed by greed nor obsessed by theneed to have ever more money. I leave that to gulls and coyotes. They are best

at fighting for scraps. (See Picture # 1 in Picture section)

What Jim chose to qualify as neglect I prefer to term Force Majeure and showmuch compassion about. For over a decade, Jim McBride has never oncewittingly neglected me or his responsibilities towards me by design! Therehad to be Force Majeure.

Therefore, I refuse to load onto Jim McBrides broad shoulders, burdens


51/53

for which Michael L. Darland is solely and alone responsible. I refuse todo so, although I know very well that Michael L. Darland does not haveand will never have the backbone to carry his own burdens.

Genuine and solid men humbly face their responsibilities with dignity

whether they are ill or not. Others, like slithery eels always attempt toslip away while assigning their ills to others.

Jim McBride had listened to my litany of health woes for years. Not once did Jimever tell me about his personal problems!

On the contrary Jim kept urging me to stay alive and to fight on. By constantly,encouraging me, before Jim finally got sick himself, Jim wanted me to believethat thanks to God and our own efforts, a better day was at hand, hopefullysoon!

Today, in May 2012, I finally know that we are both sick. That clearly explains tome why Jim, over the last year was no longer the Jim I had known and learnt torespect so very much for so many years.

Today, after reading the October 11, 2011 transcript, I respect Jim ever so muchmore.

Today, God only knows who will go first? But to the death, I will fight for Jim tobe vindicated.

Today, that is my promise to Jim McBride.

Because, all involved in Snocadia should be most thankful to James McBride,Esq,. Without that most brilliant and noble attorney, there would not have beenany Snocadia case for anyone to get rich or poor over. That case has for sureallowed all, Douglas Warr Nicholson and Judge Michael E. Cooper included, todisplay and divulge their true colors.

But, because Snocadia has become a part of our individual lifes quilt, there willbe justice for each and every one of us one day based on the color of the patchwe have each contributed to the overall Snocadia quilt.

Be it here on earth, in heaven and/or in hell, as free men, free to deal as wechoose and free to express ourselves for the common good of all and/or thedetriment of some,

In a FREE world all the options should remain ours.

May we all make the right individual choices?


52/53

Thereafter, we will each end up just exactly there, where we deserve to be. Ithank God that His ultimate justice will not be according to mans poor judgmentbut strictly in harmony with Gods omniscient eternal Justice.

I feel most confident that when that day comes Jim McBride will have a place of

choice.

Behaving just as Jesus commanded us to do, James D. McBride has alwaystreated others as he would have liked to have been treated. That is the JimMcBride I am most proud to know and to pay this tribute to.

16. PICTURES REMOVED FROM: www.snocadia.blogspot.com inaccessiblethru Picasa.

SERIES OF PICTURES OF SNOCADIA Snoqualmie Pass

See Picture Section: Snocadia.

Were those pictures too friendly towards the Environment or judged defamatory?Let the pictures speak for themselves.

17. MY PROFILE REJOICING OVER OUR TRUE WEALTH:Our Faith - Our 5 children and our 23 grand children

See Document # 46 in Documents SectionSee Picture Section: Proflie.

18. MUSIC

'We are the world' Lionel Ritchie Michael Jackson et al Isnt it too badthat Michael L. Darland, Michael E. Cooper and Google do not sing 'Our own song'and all the other songs that the rest of the world believes in and enjoys singing.'Think', if only they did! - 'Freedom, freedom, freedom would be theirs andfinally ours as well!
http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/http://www.snocadia.blogspot.com/


53/53

In all languages we could join together to sing: 'Je Chante Avec Toi Libert'.Happily singing our joy to be liberated, we could move around the world unboundand free to go from the classical music of the slaves choir in the Nabucco Opera by

Verdi, to the Mauritian Sega of Cassiya:'Le Morne'.That is from where our fellow Mauritian slaves died for the freedom ofAfrica and the whole world.

We are the world:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2H6mpUnsLI&feature=youtube_gdata_playerSing our own song:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htZ4uk-dumQ&feature=youtube_gdata_playerTHINK:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fjHsAgMw9c&feature=youtube_gdata_playerJe Chante Avec Toi LIBERTE...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YR6QDNiFtLI&feature=youtube_gdata_playerLe Morne...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evQjtT4o6vs&feature=youtube_gdata_player
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2H6mpUnsLI&feature=youtube_gdata_playerhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htZ4uk-dumQ&feature=youtube_gdata_playerhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fjHsAgMw9c&feature=youtube_gdata_playerhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YR6QDNiFtLI&feature=youtube_gdata_playerhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evQjtT4o6vs&feature=youtube_gdata_playerhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2H6mpUnsLI&feature=youtube_gdata_playerhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htZ4uk-dumQ&feature=youtube_gdata_playerhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fjHsAgMw9c&feature=youtube_gdata_playerhttp://www.youtube.com/

Date post:	05-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	lleclezio9882
View:	215 times
Download:	0 times