50
Canada’s national laboratory for particle and nuclear physics and accelerator-based science TRIUMF – Past, Present, Future TARA AGM September 21, 2017 Jonathan Bagger Director
1
Canada’s national laboratory for particle and nuclear physics and accelerator-based science
TRIUMF – Past, Present, Future TARA AGM September 21, 2017
Jonathan Bagger Director
2
201820172016
50th Anniversary
Milestones
Bienvenue à
4
Strategic Goals
1. Operate safely and effectively
2. Produce world class science
3. Connect TRIUMF to the world
5
Strategic Goals
1. Operate safely and effectively
2. Produce world class science
3. Connect TRIUMF to the world
Safety
Personnel
Audit
DirectorJonathanBagger
DeputyDirector–ScienceReinerKrücken
DeputyDirector–Opera;onsTBD
TRIUMFInnova;onsBoard
FinanceBoardofManagement
DigvirJayas,Chair
PhysicalSciencesJensDilling
LifeSciencesPaulSchaffer
EngineeringRemyDawson
AcceleratorOliverKester
TRIUMFInnova;ons
KathrynHayashi,CEO
Governance
Directorate
JimHanlonChiefAdministraFveOfficer
HenryChenChiefFinancialOfficer
AnneTrudelChiefSafetyOfficer
PatriciaBaqueroQMSLeader
EricGuétréHead,ProjectManagementOffice
SeanLeeHead,ExternalRelaFons
LisaLambertHead,StrategicCommunicaFons
7
Staffing
• Queen’s University – Joint Faculty in SNOLAB Science – One position at Queen’s, asymptotically at Queen’s – One position at TRIUMF, asymptotically at TRIUMF – Initially in support of CPARC, funded by CFREF
• University of British Columbia – Joint Faculty in Quantum Matter – One position at TRIUMF, asymptotically at TRIUMF – Initially in support of CMMS
Searchesunderway!
8
Staffing
• University of Tokyo – Joint Faculty in Neutrino Physics – One position at IPMU, asymptotically TBD – Held by Mark Hartz, member of T2K
• University of Washington – Postdoc in Nuclear Theory – One joint position at TRIUMF and INT – MOU in preparation
9
Operate Safely and Effectively
Major push to strengthen safety, quality and project management
10
Operate Safely and Effectively
August 5, 2017
12
RF Transmission Line Repair - Project Team
Role Personnel
ProjectLeader VladimirZvyagintsev
FloorCaptain BhalwinderWaraich
SystemExpert NikolaiAvreline
FacilityCoordinator YuriBylinsky
HPRFEngineer YanyunMa,Zheng;ngAng,ThomasAu
HPRFTechnician NebosjaJakovljevic,SeanWang
SRFEngineer ZhongyuanYao
SRFTechnician DevonLang,JamesKeir,BenMatheson
RemoteHandling MaicoDallaValle,DanMcDonald
MachineShop GeorgeSun,MikeWicken
ATGSupporters MaxHeilemann,CoryKiffiak,JimYoung,YetvartHosepyan,JozefOrzechowski
Beamlines BrunoGasbarri
DesignOffice TimEmmens
13
Strategic Goals
1. Operate safely and effectively
2. Produce world class science
3. Connect TRIUMF to the world
14
TRIUMF Users
15
TRIUMF Users
35%
30%
21%
14%
Scien4ficVisitors&UsersbyRegion(645)
Canada
Americas
Asia
Europe
24%
23%19%
18%
8%5% 3%
Scien4ficVisitors&UsersbyField(645)
PIF/NIF
NuclearPhysics
Theory
MaterialsScience
Par;clePhysics
AcceleratorScience
LifeSciences
TRIUMFisafullyinterna;onal,mul;disciplinaryfacility!
16
Major Projects
• Threemajorprojectscurrentlyunderway
– ARIELII
– UCNFacility
– IAMI:Ins;tuteforAdvancedMedicalIsotopes
18
Major Projects – ARIEL II
ARIEL
– ~$100M project, supported by 19 universities, led by the University of Victoria, that will triple TRIUMF’s rare isotope production
– Second phase: ARIEL II, $38M CFI project. Awarded $8.7M from the BC Knowledge Development Fund – the last piece of the puzzle!
– Investment by five provinces: AB, BC, MB, ON, QC
October 6, 2016
ARIEL is the future of TRIUMF
19
Major Projects – ARIEL II
P342ProjectManagementOffice
ARIEL-IIProgramLeadersReinerKruecken/OliverKester
ProjectEngineerEricGuetre
ProjectManagerAsitaPerera
LEGEND
Leader
Integrator
P353TargetStations
PierreBricault
AlexGottberg
P354Separator&RIBTransport
MarcoMarchetto
NormanMuller
P355Laboratories
PeterKunz
P179BL4N
Yi-NongRao
YuriBylinsky
P358CFS
PrincipalScientistA.Garnsworthy
EH&SJoeMildenberger
Operations&Training
VioletaToma
GrantsAccountantFrancisPau
P310CANREB
ReinerKruecken
FriedhelmAmes
CANREBProjectLeader
RituparnaKanungo
ProjectPhysicistBobLaxdal
BillRichert
F.Mammarella
AndersMjos
WBS1 WBS2 WBS3 WBS5 WBS7 WBS9
P363ARIEL1.5
S.Koscielniak
P359/P360VECC
BobLaxdal
N/A
`
WBS11
P424TargetHallInfrastructureGrantMinor
WBS10
P405TherapeuticIsotopes
KeithLadouceur
N/A
WBS12
ProjectCoordinatorMarkKeyzer
``
A large and complex project!
20
• AlldatesbasedonMonteCarloanalysisofschedule• Currentbestes;mates• Effortsunderwaytoaccelerateschedule
Milestones,aspresentedduringARIELTownHall,January10,2017
Major Projects – ARIEL II
Con;nuousdiscussionswithusercommunity
PHASE1
PHASE2
PHASE3
PHASE4
ISAC-ARIEL-ISACin2019?
ScienceMilestone
21
Major Projects – ARIEL II
Modulestorage
Remote-controlledcrane(exis4ng)
Hotcellfacility
Targetexchangepoint
Spenttargets
Protons
Electrons
AETE
APTW
Hallwithtwofloorlevels(exis4ng)
RIB
RIB
Conceptsfinalized:• Opera;onalmodel• Directtargetexchangeprocess• Toplevelmaintenanceandrepairprocesses• Targetmodule(targetionsourcefrontend,highvoltagepath,shielding)• Targetsta;on(gasandvacuummanagement,moduleinterfaces)• Targetpit(shielding,support/alignmentstructure,mainservicesvoids)• Hotcell,RIBmodules,electronbeamline• Shieldingconceptmeetsoccupancyanddoseraterequirements
Design (and reviews) underway!
Targets
22
Major Projects – ARIEL II
Status:
• HRSmagnetfinished
• Prototypesec;oninstalled
• Vendorsqualified• Designvalidated
B2level
GlevelRIBTransport
23
Fig.1:PlanviewoftheISACtargethall
NHC
SMPSHCITW ITE
CS
InfrastructureupgradestoISACaswellasARIEL.NewTargetModulewilladdredundancy.RefurbishedTargetModuleswilladdreliability.SafeModuleParkingandNorthHotCellwillspeedworkbyremovingbomlenecks
Major Projects – ISACUpgrades
24
Major Projects – ARIEL II
• Nowthatfundingissecured,ARIELIIcanproceedatfullbore
• ARIELwilltransformTRIUMF.Withit,ISACwillrealizeitsfullpoten;al
• TRIUMFisontracktobecomeanisotopefactorywitharenewedfocusonexcellence,quality,consistency,reliability,andtheuserexperience
25
Major Projects – Ultra Cold Neutron Facility 25
1. 480MeVprotonsontungstencreatespalla4onneutrons
2. Lead,graphiteandheavywatermoderatefastneutrons(MeV)tocoldneutrons(meV)
3. 4Heat0.7Kconverts1meV(9Å)neutronstoUCN
4. MaterialguidestransportUCNtoexperiments
26
Major Projects – Ultra Cold Neutron Facility
UCNsourcecryostat�
300KD2O
solid D2O10K
4 He<1K
UCN
Pumps�
Ac;vemagne;cshielding�
LHedewars�
Passivemagne;cshielding�Ramseycell�
lead
graphite graphite
tungsten
protons
27
Major Projects – Ultra Cold Neutron Facility
UCNStatusFirstprotoninjec;on(Nov.2016)Firstbeamontargetandneutronproduc;on(Nov.2016)Firstcoldneutronproduc;on(Nov.2016)Ver;calsourceinstalled(Spring2017)Firstultracoldneutrons–comingsoon!
FuturePlanHighintensityhorizontalsourceNeutronEDMexperimentSecondport?
28
Major Projects – IAMI
• IAMI–Ins;tuteforAdvancedMedicalIsotopes–willbuildonTRIUMF’slonghistoryinthefieldofmedicalisotopes
• Today,TRIUMFproduces2Mdosesofmedicalisotopesperyearinpartner-shipwithNordion
• Atremendoussuccessstory:Apublic-privatepartnershipthatreturnsvaluetoTRIUMF,toCanadaandtheworld
29
Major Projects – IAMI
• IAMIwillhouseaTR24cyclotronandGMPlaboratoriestoposi;onTRIUMFlifesciencesforthe21stcentury
– ProducingisotopesforclinicaluseatUBCHospitalandtheBCCancerAgency
– Producingisotopesandtracersforbiomedicalresearchanddrugdevelopment,includingbothdiagnos;csandtherapeu;cs
30
Produce World Class Science – IAMI
• IAMIprojectismovingahead–TR-24hasarrived!
• IAMIfacilityschema;cdesigniscomplete
• Workcon;nuesplanningIAMIopera;onsandseekingprivate-sectorpartners
• BCfundingsecured!NowthefocusshiqsbacktoOmawa…
IAMIFoundingPartners
31
HintofCPviola;on:δCP=0,πexcludedat2σ
Results – T2K
(rad)CPδ3− 2− 1− 0 1 2 3
ln(L
)∆
-2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30 NormalInverted
T2K Run1-8 preliminary
MEASUREMENT OF δcp
64
The 2σ CL confidence interval:
2σ CL Intervals
Normal hierarchy: [-2.98, -0.60] radians Inverted hierarchy: [-1.54, -1.19] radians
CP conserving values (0,π) fall outside of the 2σ CL intervals
Best fit point: -1.83 radians in Normal Hierarchy
The 1σ CL confidence interval: Normal hierarchy: [-2.49, -1.23] radians
critical Δχ2 values for 2σ confidence level
MarkHartz
32
Results – ALPHA First laser spectroscopy on anti-H
• First demonstration: – Precision already 2x10-10
Δf ~ 400 kHz – Sensitive to antiproton internal
structure at 20% level • Major Canadian contributions
– Cryostat with laser access • TRIUMF/Calgary
– Annihilation detection • TRIUMF
– Magnetometry • SFU/UBC
– Laser cooling development • UBC/TRIUMF
– Operation & Run Coordination
M.Ahmadietal.,Nature541(2017)
33
• Exclusivemeasurementofhalonucleus11Bescameringfromhigh-Ztarget
• Differen;alcrosssec;onsunderstoodifexcited10Becorestructureistakenintoaccount
• PossibleatTRIUMF-ISACbecauseof– Intense11BefromISAC-TRILIS,high-quality
accelera;onwithISAC-II– TIGRESSexperimentalinfrastructurecapable
ofcouplingtodedicatedexternaldetectors
V.Pesudoetal,Phys.Rev.Lem.118,152502(2017)
Elas;c->11Be
Inelas;c->11Be*->11Be+γ
Breakup->10Be(+n)
Results – TIGRESS
34
Feb 17 2016 Angelo Calci
11Be with NCSMC
1
exp.
n+10Be(0+)
Robert Roth - TU Darmstadt - February 2015
9Be: NCSM vs. NCSMC
! NCSMC shows much better Nmax convergence
! NCSM tries to capture continuum effects via large Nmax
! drastic difference for the 1/2+ state right at threshold
10
6 8 10 12 exp. 12 10 8 6
-2-1
01
2
34
5
6
7
8
.
Eth
r.[M
eV]
(a)
NCSM NCSMC
7 9 11 exp. 11 9 7Nmax Nmax
0123456789
10
.
Eth
r.[M
eV]
(b)
NCSM NCSMC
6 8 10 12 exp. 12 10 8 6
-2-1
01
2
34
5
6
7
8
.E
thr.
[MeV
]
(a)
NCSM NCSMC
7 9 11 exp. 11 9 7Nmax Nmax
0123456789
10
.
Eth
r.[M
eV]
(b)
NCSM NCSMC
NCSM NCSMC NCSM NCSMCnegative parity positive parity
Nmax Nmax Nmax Nmax
NN+3
N full
α = 0
.062
5 fm
4 , ħΩ
= 20
MeV
, E 3
max
= 1
4
Langhammer, Navrátil, Quaglioni, Hupin, Calci, Roth; Phys. Rev. C 91, 021301(R) (2015)
E thr. [M
eV]
NN NN+3N(400)
n+10Be(2+)
n+10Be(2+)
N2LOsatexp.
exp.NN NN+3N(400) N2LOsatexp.
7
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
.
E χ[M
eV]
8
1/2+1/2-
5/2+
3/2-
3/2-
5/2-
3/2+
9/2+
Contribu;onsfromchiralnuclearforcesDiscrimina;onbetweenconflic;ngphoto-dissocia;onexperiments
Can Ab Initio Theory Explain the Phenomenon of Parity Inversion in 11Be?
Angelo Calci,1,* Petr Navrátil,1,† Robert Roth,2 Jérémy Dohet-Eraly,1,‡ Sofia Quaglioni,3 and Guillaume Hupin4,51TRIUMF, 4004 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2A3, Canada
2Institut für Kernphysik, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany3Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, L-414, Livermore, California 94551, USA4Institut de Physique Nucléaire, Université Paris-Sud, IN2P3/CNRS, F-91406 Orsay Cedex, France
5CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France(Received 11 August 2016; revised manuscript received 7 October 2016; published 9 December 2016)
The weakly bound exotic 11Be nucleus, famous for its ground-state parity inversion and distinctnþ 10Be halo structure, is investigated from first principles using chiral two- and three-nucleon forces.An explicit treatment of continuum effects is found to be indispensable. We study the sensitivity of the 11Bespectrum to the details of the three-nucleon force and demonstrate that only certain chiral interactions arecapable of reproducing the parity inversion. With such interactions, the extremely large E1 transitionbetween the bound states is reproduced. We compare our photodisintegration calculations to conflictingexperimental data and predict a distinct dip around the 3=2−1 resonance energy. Finally, we predictlow-lying 3=2þ and 9=2þ resonances that are not or not sufficiently measured in experiments.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.242501
The theoretical understanding of exotic neutron-rich nucleiconstitutes a tremendous challenge. These systems oftencannot be explained bymean-field approaches and contradictthe regular shell structure. The spectrum of 11Be has somevery peculiar features. The 1=2þ ground state (g.s.) is looselybound by 502 keVwith respect to the nþ 10Be threshold andis separated by only 320 keV from its parity-inverted 1=2−
partner [1], which would be the expected g.s. in the standardshell-model picture. Such parity inversion, already noticed byTalmi and Unna [2] in the early 1960s, is one of the bestexamples of the disappearance of the N ¼ 8 magic numberwith an increasing neutron to proton ratio. The next(nþ nþ 9Be) breakup threshold appears at 7.31 MeV [3],such that the rich resonance structure at low energies isdominated by the nþ 10Be dynamics. Peculiar also is theelectric-dipole transition strength between the two boundstates, which has attracted much attention since its firstmeasurement in 1971 [4] and was remeasured in 1983 [5]and2014 [6]. It is the strongest known transitionbetween low-lying states, attributed to the halo character of 11Be.An accurate description of this complex spectrum is
anticipated to be sensitive to the details of the nuclear force[7], such that a precise knowledge of the nucleon-nucleon(NN) interaction, desirably obtained from first principles,is crucial. Moreover, the inclusion of three-nucleon (3N)effects has been found to be indispensable for an accuratedescription of nuclear systems [8,9]. The chiral effectivefield theory constitutes one of the most promising candi-dates for deriving the nuclear interaction. Formulated byWeinberg [10–12], it is based on the fundamental sym-metries of QCD and uses pions and nucleons as relevantdegrees of freedom. Within this theory, NN, 3N, andhigher many-body interactions arise in a natural hierarchy
[10–16]. The details of these interactions depend on thespecific choices made during the construction. In particular,the way the interactions are constrained to experimentaldata can have a strong impact [17].In this Letter, we tackle the question if ab initio
calculations can provide an accurate description of the11Be spectrum and reproduce the experimental groundstate. Pioneering ab initio investigations of 11Be did notaccount for the important effects of 3N forces and wereincomplete in the treatment of either long- [18] or short-range [19,20] correlations, both of which are crucial toarrive at an accurate description of this system.In this Letter, we report the first complete ab initio
calculations of the 11Be nucleus using the framework ofthe no-core shell model with continuum (NCSMC) [21–23],which combines the capability to describe the extendednþ 10Be configurations of Refs. [19,20] with a robusttreatment of many-body short-range correlations. We adopta family of chiral interactions in which theNN component isconstrained, in a traditional sense, to two-nucleon properties[24] and the 3N force is fitted in three- and sometimes four-body systems [25–28]. In addition, we also employ a newerchiral interaction, obtained from a simultaneous fit of NNand 3N components to nucleon-nucleon scattering data andselected properties of nuclei as complex as 25O [29–31].Many-body approach.—The general idea of the NCSMC
is to represent the A-nucleon wave function as the gener-alized cluster expansion [21–23]
jΨJπTA i ¼
X
λ
cJπT
λ jAλJπTiþX
ν
Zdrr2
γJπT
ν ðrÞr
AνjΦJπTνr i:
ð1Þ
PRL 117, 242501 (2016) P HY S I CA L R EV I EW LE T T ER Sweek ending
9 DECEMBER 2016
0031-9007=16=117(24)=242501(6) 242501-1 © 2016 American Physical Society
How Many-Body Correlations and α Clustering Shape 6He
Carolina Romero-Redondo,1,* Sofia Quaglioni,1,† Petr Navrátil,2,‡ and Guillaume Hupin3,§1Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, L-414, Livermore, California 94551, USA
2TRIUMF, 4004 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2A3, Canada3CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France
(Received 1 June 2016; revised manuscript received 15 August 2016; published 23 November 2016)
The Borromean 6He nucleus is an exotic system characterized by two halo neutrons orbiting around acompact 4He (or α) core, in which the binary subsystems are unbound. The simultaneous reproduction of itssmall binding energy and extendedmatter and point-proton radii has been a challenge for ab initio theoreticalcalculations based on traditional bound-state methods. Using soft nucleon-nucleon interactions based onchiral effective field theory potentials, we show that supplementing themodel spacewith 4Heþ nþ n clusterdegrees of freedom largely solves this issue. We analyze the role played by α clustering and many-bodycorrelations, and study the dependence of the energy spectrum on the resolution scale of the interaction.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.222501
Introduction.—Achieving a comprehensive and unifiedtreatment of many-body correlations and clustering inatomic nuclei constitutes a frontier for contemporary nucleartheory. A light exotic nucleus that has been challenging ourunderstanding of such complex phenomena based onnucleonic degrees of freedom and high-quality models oftheir interactions (i.e., within an ab initio framework) ishelium-6 (6He). This is a prominent example of Borromeanquantum “halo,” i.e., a weakly-bound state of three particles(αþ nþ n) otherwise unbound in pairs, characterized by a“large probability of configurations within classically for-bidden regions of space” [1]. In the last few years, its bindingenergy [2] and charge radius [3] have been experimentallydetermined with high precision. The 6He ground state (g.s.)is also of great interest for tests of fundamental interactionsand symmetries. Precisionmeasurements of itsβ-decay half-life have recently taken place [4] and efforts are underway todetermine the angular correlation between the emittedelectron and neutrino [5]. To date, traditional ab initiobound-state calculations can successfully describe theinterior of the 6He wave function [6–10], but are unableto fully account for its three-cluster asymptotic behavior.At the same time, the only ab initio study of αþ nþ ndynamics naturally explains the asymptotic configurations,but underbinds the 6He g.s. owing to missing many-bodycorrelations [11,12]. As a result, a comprehensive descrip-tion of the 6He g.s. properties is still missing.In this Letter we present a study of the 6He g.s. in which
both six-body correlations and clustering are successfullyaddressed by means of the no-core shell model withcontinuum (NCSMC) [13]. This approach, introduced todescribe binary processes starting from two-body [14,15]and later three-body [16–18] Hamiltonians, is here gener-alized to the treatment of three-cluster dynamics. Wefurther explore the role of six-body correlations in thedescription of the low-lying αþ nþ n continuum, required
to accurately evaluate the 4Heð2n; γÞ6He radiative capture(one of the mechanisms by which stars can overcome theinstability of the five- and eight-nucleon systems and createheavier nuclei [19]), and of the 3Hð3H; 2nÞ4He reactioncontributing to the neutron yield in inertial confinementfusion experiments [20,21].Approach.—In the NCSMC, the A-nucleon wave func-
tion of a system characterized by a coreþ nþ n asymp-totic in the total angular momentum, parity, and isospinchannel JπT is written as the generalized cluster expansion
jΨJπTi ¼X
λ
cJπT
λ jAλJπTi
þX
ν
ZZdxdyx2y2GJπT
ν ðx; yÞAνjΦJπTνxy i; ð1Þ
where cJπT
λ and GJπTν ðx; yÞ are, respectively, discrete and
continuous variational amplitudes to be determined,jAλJπTi is the square-integrable (antisymmetric) solutionfor the λth energy eigenstate of the system obtainedworking within the A-body harmonic oscillator (HO) basisof the no-core shell model (NCSM) [22],
jΦJπTνxy i ¼ ½(jA − 2λcJ
πcc TciðjnijniÞðsnnTnnÞ)ðSTÞ
× (YlxðηnnÞYlyðηc;nnÞ)ðLÞ&ðJπTÞ
×δðx − ηnnÞ
xηnn
δðy − ηc;nnÞyηc;nn
ð2Þ
are continuous microscopic-cluster states [11] describingthe organization of the nucleons into an (A − 2)-nucleoncore and two neutrons jni, and the intercluster antisym-metrizer Aν enforces the Pauli principle. The core eigen-states are also computed in the NCSM, with the same HOfrequency ℏΩ and consistent number of quanta above thelowest-energy configuration Nmax used for the A-nucleonsystem. The states of Eq. (2) are labeled by the quantumnumbers ν¼fA−2λcJ
πcc Tc;snnTnnSlxlyLg. Furthermore,
PRL 117, 222501 (2016) P HY S I CA L R EV I EW LE T T ER Sweek ending
25 NOVEMBER 2016
0031-9007=16=117(22)=222501(5) 222501-1 © 2016 American Physical Society
Also6He
First-principlesstudyof11Be.AbiniFocalcula;onsdemonstrate:
Results – Theory
35
Prostate cancer patient before and after treatment with 225Ac-PSMA C Kratochwil, et al, J Nuc Med (2016) doi:10.2967/jnumed.116.178673
Results – Medicine
Right now, progress is limited by isotope supply
36
ARIEL/IAMI
Exci;ngOpportunity:ARIELSymbio;cTarget
37
Strategic Goals
1. Operate safely and effectively
2. Produce world class science
3. Connect TRIUMF to the world
38
DNP 2016
American Physical Society DNP Annual Meeting held in Vancouver
– 668 registered participants – 168 undergraduate students!
39
2017 Summer Institute
40
Viva l’Italia
June 30, 2017 – H.E. Sergio Mattarella, President of Italy, visited TRIUMF
41
TRIUMF Innovations
• TRIUMF’s business-facing arm
• Deeply integrated into TRIUMF
• Links science and technology to tangible business opportunities
42
Commercial Partners
43
ARTMS
ARTMS Products, Inc
• A TRIUMF spin-off company devoted to Tc-99m production using medical cyclotrons
• IAMI will supply Tc-99m to British Columbia using ARTMS technology
• About to receive its first infusion of venture capital
44
Five-Year Plan 2020-2025
Five-Year Plan 2020-2025
45
Five-Year Plan 2020-2025
Boundarycondi;on:consistentwithSAPLongRangePlan
46
Five-Year Plan 2020-2025
• Consulta4on:
• Internalstrategicplanningexercises• Divisionalandins;tu;onal
• Broadcommunityconsulta4on• ScienceWeek,July10-14• SubmissionstoPPAC,TRIUMF’sPolicyandPlanningAdvisoryCommimee
• Governance:
• Execu4veCommi_eedrivesplanning• SteeringCommi_eeoverseestheprocess• PPACevaluatesprojectsandcommitments• ACOTreviewsmainelementsoftheplan• BoardofManagementapprovestheplan
47
Five-Year Plan – Steering Committee
Name Title Institution Jonathan Bagger Director TRIUMF David Castle Vice President Research University of Victoria, Vice Chair TRIUMF Board Rod Clark Division Deputy Lawrence Berkeley Lab, former SAP-EEC Chair Robert Dunlop Former ADM (retired) (Industry Canada) Kathryn Hayashi President and CEO TRIUMF Innovations Ritu Kanungo Professor Saint Mary's University Oliver Kester ALD - Accelerator Division TRIUMF Suzanne Lapi Associate Professor University of Alabama, Birmingham Kyle Leach Assistant Professor Colorado School of Mines, TUEC Chair Graeme Luke Professor and Chair McMaster University Scott Oser Professor University of British Columbia Nigel Smith Director SNOLAB Brigitte Vachon Associate Professor McGill University Michelle Wong Director, Research University of British Columbia
Charge and Members
• Oversee the consultation process and solicit input from the relevant stakeholder communities • Provide critical feedback on the priorities and initiatives, ensuring that they align with stakeholder interests • Act as review panel for the final plan and the associated communications strategy
48
Five-Year Plan – Structure and Timeline
January 11, 2017 ARIEL Town Hall
May 26, 2017 Call for PPAC Proposals
July 10-14, 2017 Science Week
October 16, 2017 PPAC deadline
Fall 2017 PPAC review of proposals
Winter 17/18 Formulation of plan
Winter 2018 Consultation on plan
Spring 2018 ACOT review / Board approval
September 2018 Release of FYP 2020-2025
Fall 2018 International Peer Review
Fall 2018 Lobbying push in Ottawa
• Five-Year Plan 2020-25 will contain
• A high-level summary for Ministers • A 20 page strategic plan for Analysts • A 50 page implementation plan for
ACOT, Peer Review Committee • Additional background on a new TRIUMF
website
• Facility information • Science highlights 2013-2018 • CVs of Research Scientists
Plan will go public in September 2018
Communication and promotion will be done with 50th Anniversary Celebration in 2018
http://www.triumf.ca/FYP2020-25
The Michael Craddock Endowment
The Grant Sheffer Endowment
50
