+ All Categories
Home > Documents > TTCP Uninhabited Air Vehicle Systems

TTCP Uninhabited Air Vehicle Systems

Date post: 05-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: arawn
View: 123 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
TTCP Uninhabited Air Vehicle Systems. Presentation to NDIA Paul Pace Chair AER TP-6. Thank You for Inviting Me to Palm Springs. History of TTCP UAV Activity. Pan-TTCP “UAVs in the Battlefield” Workshop. UAV Concept of Use Workshops. UAV Technology Assessment Workshop. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
33
TTCP Uninhabited Air Vehicle Systems Presentation to NDIA Paul Pace Chair AER TP-6
Transcript
  • TTCPUninhabited Air Vehicle SystemsPresentation to NDIAPaul Pace Chair AER TP-6

  • Thank You for Inviting Me to Palm Springs

  • History of TTCP UAV Activity19981999200020012002Pan-TTCP UAVs in the Battlefield WorkshopAER AG-1UAV Systems & TechnologiesJSA AG-8 UAV ConceptsAER TP-6 Uninhabited Air SystemsUAV Concept of Use WorkshopsUAV Technology Assessment WorkshopGlobal Hawk Studies

  • AG-8 WorkshopEarlyTacticalStrategicFutureCONOPS?time

  • Issues Arising from Pan TTCP UAV ConferenceWhat are the most promising & likely future military applications of UAV technology? (Future CONOPS) What are the technical issues associated with future coalition operation of UAVs? Into what UAV-related technology areas should the TTCP R&D investment be directed?

  • AG-8 ApproachHow do we identify UAV Critical Capability Needs and the Critical Technologies likely to solve them?Two ways:(1) Experimental Approach(2) Operational Analysis Approach

  • AG-8 ActivityApril, June, Nov 1999 Development of critical technology assessment methodology2000 Global Hawk overflight of Canada (date TBD) May 2000 - Washington DC Pan-TTCP UAV Technology Assessment Workshop.May 2001 - Wrap-up, Adelaide (Observers to Global Hawk overflights of Australia)

  • (1) AG-8 Methodology to Determine Critical UAV Technology(2)(3)(4)(5)

  • Potential Concepts/CONOPSCapability RequirementsCapability Gaps

    Critical TechnologiesTechnology Priorities

  • Concepts of Use WorkshopHigh Intensity Conflict ScenarioHunting and killing Surface-to-surface Missile (SSM) systemsHigh Altitude Long Endurance (HALE) UAVUnmanned Combat Air Vehicle (UCAV)Operation Other Than War (OOTW) ScenarioAttacking time critical targetAir Launched UAV (ALUAV) with manned aircraftTactical UAV

  • Scenario 1 - High Intensity Conflict(System Concept = HALE + UCAV vs SSM)

  • Technology Assessment WorkshopHeld May 16-18, 2000 in Washington DC.46 Military and civilian technical experts from 4 nations.Representation from DREs, Air SP, D Mar Strat, Army Doctrine, NRC.3 syndicates discussing all 4 scenarios.Common themes emerged and clear vision of technology challenges and priorities for R&D.All UAV concepts determined to be of high military value, but cost and risk are high.

  • Technology Ratings291615131075543222105101520253035Automatic Target RecognitionRobust Network CommunicationsAutonomous Situational AwarenessAll weather Imaging (Radar, mmWave, Fopen, Bistatic, synthetic presentation)Automatic Mission PlanningSensor Data FusionHyper Spectral Imagery and LADARFlight/Airspace Management and DoctrineSurvivability Technologies and DoctrinesSensor ManagementSystems Integration and OptimizationWeapons GuidanceLow cost Technologies applied to sensors and airframesFlight Control AlgorithmsRed: Significant R&D requiredYellow: Continued R&D will probably get us thereGreen: will happen with minimum investment

  • SURVEY BASED ON AUVSI DATA Spring 2003

    Chart1

    Design (Inc. Propulsion)0.1860465116

    Autonomy0.1782945736

    Operations0.1705426357

    C3 + Networking0.1705426357

    Airspace Integration0.0697674419

    Sensors + Visualization0.0620155039

    Test & Evaluation0.0542635659

    Missions0.0465116279

    UCAV0.0387596899

    HR & Training0.023255814

    Occurance

    UAV Research Areas

    Sheet1

    Design (Inc. Propulsion)0.186046511624

    Autonomy0.178294573623

    Operations0.170542635722

    C3 + Networking0.170542635722

    Airspace Integration0.06976744199

    Sensors + Visualization0.06201550398

    Test & Evaluation0.05426356597

    Missions0.04651162796

    UCAV0.03875968995

    HR & Training0.0232558143

    129

    Sheet1

    Occurance

    UAV Research Areas

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • JSA AG-8 RecommendationsAutomated Target Detection/RecognitionAutomated Mission PlanningAutomated Dynamic Mission and Flight ManagementAll Weather ImagingBattlespace ConnectivityUAVs in Urban Operations

  • TTCP AER TP-6 Summary

  • The Strategic Technology Drivers for Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Systems Include Autonomy Communication Bandwidth Data and Information Fusion Secondary Strategic Technologies Include Performance (Payload, Range, Maneuverability, Agility) Survivability Affordability Safety Mission Effectiveness Sustainability System

  • Research StrategicDirection Autonomy Bandwidth Fusion

  • Operational usage topics including roles, aircraft usage and life expectations, operational environments including threats, worldwide conditions, maintenance or other logistic support constraints, etc. Airspace integration issues In-service feedback on design, operation and ownership i.e. capability limitations, cost / manpower drivers, in-field repair needs, reliability /maintainability, ops requirements, etc.

    Roles envisaged for r/w UAVs and hence design drivers. Mission requirements drive vehicle design. Provide warfighter requirements for small to micro UAVsPAN AER UAV Guidance RequestsWay Ahead

    Pan TTCP UAV Requirements Workshop

  • Small/Micro UAVs and Urban Operations

  • Allied Participation

    Experimentation Support & Cold Weather Field Testing

    HNeT neural processing algorithms

    Small Observer Program

    DRDC, CFEC, CIC

    DERA

  • Turret see-through panoramic vision

    Combination of EO/IR and HRR radar, UAV integration

    Automatic target detection recognition and tracking

    Enhanced Surveillance System

  • Concept of OperationPanoramic ImageNIIRS 3-5NIIRS 6-8 targetTargetmarkedtrackedUAVImage

  • Small UAV LAV IntegrationAutomated TargetDetection TrackingRecognition

  • Ground Target Identification

  • MSTAR SARImagery

  • Receiver Operating Conditions (ROC)

    Fraction of target images declared targets (Pd) Fraction of confuser images declared targets (Pfa)MSTAR Baseline

  • Detection of Humans in IR Imagerytrain HNeT torecognize humansresponse recall

    Chart1

    10.994041

    10.993882

    11.00679

    10.994792

    11.01138

    11.00948

    11.0005

    11.00507

    10.981952

    10.990894

    10.89457

    11.0096

    10.983922

    10.991843

    10.989373

    10.963908

    0-0.0417196

    00.0583259

    0-0.00132243

    00.0335818

    00.0778978

    00.0091917

    00.0788874

    0-0.0132196

    0-0.051696

    0-0.0414466

    00.0232522

    00.00357389

    0-0.00782608

    00.308577

    0-0.0293045

    0-0.0193307

    0-0.0673157

    00.0170061

    00.326276

    00.0723337

    0-0.0307981

    0-0.00949889

    00.00956867

    00.0288901

    0-0.0132946

    0-0.0721404

    00.0319262

    00.0244092

    00.00899047

    00.00605211

    00.0457183

    0-0.0165193

    00.0544105

    0-0.00919093

    00.0293822

    0-0.0317352

    0-0.157161

    0-0.0306022

    00.0166569

    00.0141022

    0-0.0360166

    00.0335863

    00.0219769

    0-0.0394587

    00.0268018

    0-0.0471568

    00.0143388

    0-0.0110694

    0-0.0169528

    0-0.0313553

    00.0611352

    00.00460715

    00.0204268

    00.0199209

    00.154346

    00.0104037

    00.133018

    00.0196603

    Sample

    Response

    IR human results

    Desired[1]HNeT[1]Error[1]

    10.9940410.00595903

    10.9938820.0061183

    11.00679-0.00679231

    10.9947920.00520825

    11.01138-0.0113828

    11.00948-0.00948381

    11.0005-0.000500798

    11.00507-0.00506926

    10.9819520.0180476

    10.9908940.0091055

    10.894570.10543

    11.0096-0.00960457

    10.9839220.016078

    10.9918430.00815749

    10.9893730.0106272

    10.9639080.0360917

    0-0.04171960.0417196

    00.0583259-0.0583259

    0-0.001322430.00132243

    00.0335818-0.0335818

    00.0778978-0.0778978

    00.0091917-0.0091917

    00.0788874-0.0788874

    0-0.01321960.0132196

    0-0.0516960.051696

    0-0.04144660.0414466

    00.0232522-0.0232522

    00.00357389-0.00357389

    0-0.007826080.00782608

    00.308577-0.308577

    0-0.02930450.0293045

    0-0.01933070.0193307

    0-0.06731570.0673157

    00.0170061-0.0170061

    00.326276-0.326276

    00.0723337-0.0723337

    0-0.03079810.0307981

    0-0.009498890.00949889

    00.00956867-0.00956867

    00.0288901-0.0288901

    0-0.01329460.0132946

    0-0.07214040.0721404

    00.0319262-0.0319262

    00.0244092-0.0244092

    00.00899047-0.00899047

    00.00605211-0.00605211

    00.0457183-0.0457183

    0-0.01651930.0165193

    00.0544105-0.0544105

    0-0.009190930.00919093

    00.0293822-0.0293822

    0-0.03173520.0317352

    0-0.1571610.157161

    0-0.03060220.0306022

    00.0166569-0.0166569

    00.0141022-0.0141022

    0-0.03601660.0360166

    00.0335863-0.0335863

    00.0219769-0.0219769

    0-0.03945870.0394587

    00.0268018-0.0268018

    0-0.04715680.0471568

    00.0143388-0.0143388

    0-0.01106940.0110694

    0-0.01695280.0169528

    0-0.03135530.0313553

    00.0611352-0.0611352

    00.00460715-0.00460715

    00.0204268-0.0204268

    00.0199209-0.0199209

    00.154346-0.154346

    00.0104037-0.0104037

    00.133018-0.133018

    00.0196603-0.0196603

    IR human results

    Sample

    Response

  • Small UAV Multiple FOV Imaging

  • Detection and Identification of Small Targets

  • EO PAYLOADS Video Imagery to Ground Control Station HiRes Still Images Stored On Board UAV LoRes Thumbnails (Still Images) to GCS HiRes Image to GCS (~ 5 minutes delay) WWW Dissemination of Images in NRT Fixed Orientation Cameras (with Zoom) LOS: Range & Control Link ~ 60km BLOS: Data & Control Link ~ Iridium

  • Basic ApproachGeolocate Emitters using multiple UAVs (This may require multiple types of payloads in a sequenced/scheduled manner)Cue UAV platform fitted with other (EO) sensors to identify.EmitterEmitterEmitterSensor

  • TTCP Advanced Sensor Package

    real-time processing advanced ATR advanced EO sensor 220 LB payload auto target detection auto target tracking stealth Chem/bio detection acoustic sensor weapons compatible ACN

    Good afternoon.

    SLIDE 2

    As you know, Canada has had a mixed interest in UAV systems over the last 20 years, with the only serious considerations being their use in Army tactical roles. Even that project, UASTAS, has yet to be funded.

    UAVs had their beginnings in WW2 and the Vietnam war.UAV technology has progressed rapidly in the last 5 years.

    Shorter range tactical UAVs have paved the way for long-range long-endurance strategic UAVs. Yet we in Canada have still avoided any serious consideration of these advanced UAVs and how they may contribute to CF capability.

    Now the technical community is developing Unmanned Combat UAVs and thinking of micro UAVs in the future.

    In this briefing we will provide a technical overview of a very recent development in UAVs the United States Air Forces High Altitude Endurance UAV Global Hawk.

    Through the collaborative opportunities of the TTCP (US, Can, UK, Aus) we have been provided with the opportunity to work with the USAF in a joint experiment involving Global Hawk flying over Canada.

    GH is flying but is not yet in production. Global Hawk is what is known as an Advanced Concept Technology Demonstrator. Its development started in 1995 by Defence Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA) in response to capability deficiencies identified in the Gulf War, where the field tactical commanders had difficulty obtaining timely intelligence, reconnaissance information and battle damage assessment.

    Global Hawk is an example of how technology is changing the modern battlefield.

    HNeT was trained on a series of IR images of humans in various scenarios and countertrained against the background and other objects such as the dog. The total number of training images was not very large (only about 30) but the results indicated that all of the humans could be detected with no false alarms. I suspect that this would be typically the case for images similar to the ones shown above. Degraded images or partial obscuration of the human would require additional training. For the above test HNeT was trained on 70% of the data and tested on 30% in a random fashion. On a small sample of this size I was not able to produce a ROC curve. For the above examples, the HNeT cell required only about 50 memory elements and it would be capable of processing thousands of frames per second on a Pentium class machine.The results indicated that further testing is justified. Images from the actual IR camera (at least we should know the specifications of the camera) could be obtained in realistic scenarios and a statistical analysis of the results could be produced.The Aerosonde miniature Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), which has a wingspan of 2.9m, is Australian-made and was the first UAV to fly across the Atlantic Ocean. The UAV was originally designed to take meteorological observations and typically has a flight endurance of more than 30 hours and a range of over 300 km, when flown with its meteorological payload.

    Above figure puts payload/endurance/range numbers into geographic perspective. 2kg payload is assumed.The black line represents - when UAV launched from Darwin it canl fly to the black line and remain on station for 12 hrs before returning to Darwin.Similarly for the other lines.


Recommended