+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Tuberculosis in the ED Handout - Rutgers...

Tuberculosis in the ED Handout - Rutgers...

Date post: 26-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
13
11/4/11 1 Tuberculosis Elissa Schechter-Perkins MD, MPH, DTMH Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine Boston university School of Medicine Emergency Department Diagnosis, Treatment, and Infection Control Topics of Discussion Suspicion of TB Initial Management Infection Control Who Might have Tuberculosis Worldwide United States : Leading infectious cause of death Affects over 1/3 of the world’s population 1,700,000 die every year from it : Increased from 1980s-1993 2010 3.6 cases/ 100,000 people 11,182 Massachusetts http://www.cdc.gov/tb/statistics/reports/2010/pdf/report2010.pdf Who Might have Tuberculosis Worldwide United States : Leading infectious cause of death Affects over 1/3 of the world’s population 1,700,000 die every year from it : Increased from 1980s-1993 2010 3.6 cases/ 100,000 people : Massachusetts 2010 3.3 cases/100,000 people 222 11,182 2010 Annual Statistical Report, Division of Tuberculosis Prevention and Control, Bureau of Infectious Disease Prevention, Response and Services, MA Department of Public Health Why the ED TB Risk Factor Percentage (in US) Racial/Ethnic Minorities Hispanic/Latino Asian/Pacific Islander Black/African American 29% 28% 25% Foreign Born 59% 2009 Annual Statistical Report, Division of Tuberculosis Prevention and Control, Bureau of Infectious Disease Prevention, Response and Services, MA Department of Public Health Why the ED TB Risk Factor Percentage in MA (Case Rate) Substance Abusers 9% Homeless 3% (24.9/100,000) Correctional Facilities 2% (20/100,000) Nursing Homes 2% *Information limited by incomplete HIV reporting
Transcript
Page 1: Tuberculosis in the ED Handout - Rutgers Universityglobaltb.njms.rutgers.edu/downloads/courses/2011...The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 6(4):332–339. April

11/4/11

1

Tuberculosis

Elissa Schechter-Perkins MD, MPH, DTMH

Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine

Boston university School of Medicine

Emergency Department Diagnosis, Treatment, and Infection Control

Topics of Discussion

!  Suspicion of TB

!  Initial Management

!  Infection Control

Who Might have Tuberculosis

Worldwide

United States

: Leading infectious cause of death Affects over 1/3 of the world’s population

1,700,000 die every year from it

: Increased from 1980s-1993 2010 3.6 cases/ 100,000 people

11,182 Massachusetts

http://www.cdc.gov/tb/statistics/reports/2010/pdf/report2010.pdf

Who Might have Tuberculosis

Worldwide

United States

: Leading infectious cause of death Affects over 1/3 of the world’s population

1,700,000 die every year from it

: Increased from 1980s-1993 2010 3.6 cases/ 100,000 people

: Massachusetts 2010 3.3 cases/100,000 people

222

11,182

2010 Annual Statistical Report, Division of Tuberculosis Prevention and Control, Bureau of Infectious Disease Prevention, Response and Services, MA Department of Public Health

Why the ED�We See It

TB Risk Factor Percentage (in US)

Racial/Ethnic Minorities Hispanic/Latino

Asian/Pacific Islander Black/African American

29% 28% 25%

Foreign Born 59%

2009 Annual Statistical Report, Division of Tuberculosis Prevention and Control, Bureau of Infectious Disease Prevention, Response and Services, MA Department of Public Health

Why the ED�We See It

TB Risk Factor Percentage in MA

(Case Rate)

Substance Abusers 9%

Homeless 3%

(24.9/100,000)

Correctional Facilities 2%

(20/100,000)

Nursing Homes 2%

*Information limited by incomplete HIV reporting

Page 2: Tuberculosis in the ED Handout - Rutgers Universityglobaltb.njms.rutgers.edu/downloads/courses/2011...The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 6(4):332–339. April

11/4/11

2

Why the ED�We See It

!  Most likely to have tuberculosis: ethnic Minorities, Foreign Born, those with HIV, drug users, nursing home patients, homeless patients, prisoners, Chronic illnesses such as Diabetes and Renal Failure

!  Most Likely to have !   no “usual source of care”

!   Acute illnesses requiring urgent medical attention

!  Most Likely to show up to an ED near you

High Risk

Why the ED�We See It

Ethnic Minorities Foreign Born HIV Drug Users Nursing Home Homeless Prisoners Chronic Disease

Why the ED�We Miss It

!  In a 30 month time period, 44 contagious TB patients made 66 ED visits prior to TB diagnosis

Sokolove, PE et al. “The Emergency Department Presentation of Patients with Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis.” Academic Emergency Medicine Volume 7 Issue 9, September 2000

Why the ED�We Miss It

!  Nearly 50% of newly diagnosed TB cases had antecedent ED visit in previous 6 months !   An average of 2.2 visits

!   As approached diagnosis, more likely to have an ED visit

!   ED Visitors are the most sick of all TB patients

Long, R et al. “The emergency department is a determinant point of contact of tuberculosis patients prior to diagnosis.” The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 6(4):332–339. April 2002.

Why the ED�We Miss It

!  Not Improving - at least in MA !   Between 2008 and 2010:

!   144/650 documented TB cases sought care in an ED

!   only 10 had TB diagnosed (7%)

!   More than 35 of them had multiple ED visits

Patricia A. Iyer, MSN, RN, BC, et al. Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Tuberculosis Prevention and Control

Why the ED�We Miss It

And it could be your ED

Not just urban areas

In 2009, 116 TB patients visited different EDs throughout MA

41

Sue Etkind, R.N., MS Director, Division of TB Prevention and Control

Page 3: Tuberculosis in the ED Handout - Rutgers Universityglobaltb.njms.rutgers.edu/downloads/courses/2011...The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 6(4):332–339. April

11/4/11

3

Why the ED�We Miss It

!  In hospitalized patients, the median interval from admission to initiation of medications was 6 days

!  75% of patients had a delay of at least 24 hours

Rao VK, Iademarco EP, Fraser VJ, et al. Delays in the suspicion and treatment of tubercu- losis among hospitalized patients Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:404-411.

Why the ED�We Miss It

!  Clinical presentation of TB can be variable and non-specific !   Cough present in only 64%

!   Cough was Chief Complaint in only 20%

!  Only 36% had respiratory complaint at triage

Sokolove, PE et al. “The Emergency Department Presentation of Patients with Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis.” Academic Emergency Medicine Volume 7 Issue 9, September 2000

Why the ED�We Miss It

!  Clinical presentation of contagious TB patient may not even be related to TB

Sokolove, PE et al. “The Emergency Department Presentation of Patients with Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis.” Academic Emergency Medicine Volume 7 Issue 9, September 2000

Why the ED�We Miss It

!  Even worse for children !   60 children seen in clinic had been seen in

ED previously

!   27% had extra-thoracic disease

!  Frequently accompanied by adult with undiagnosed pulmonary TB

Andrea T. Cruz et al. Emergency Department Presentation of Children With Tuberculosis. Academic Emergency Medicine 2011; 18:726–732

Muñoz FM, et al. Tuberculosis among adult visitors of children with suspected tuberculosis and employees at a children’s hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002; 23:568–72

Why the ED�We Miss It

!  Definitive diagnosis is frequently not possible in the ED !   Culturing the organism can take days to

weeks

!   Ziehl-Neelson staining, which identifies Acid Fast Bacilli, is only 50-80% sensitive

Why the ED�We Spread It

Rothman, RE et al. “Communicable Respiratory Threats in the ED: Tuberculosis, Influenza, SARS, and Other Aerosolized Infections.” Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America. 24(4) 2006.

Page 4: Tuberculosis in the ED Handout - Rutgers Universityglobaltb.njms.rutgers.edu/downloads/courses/2011...The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 6(4):332–339. April

11/4/11

4

Why the ED�We Spread It

!  Between Patients

!  From Patients to Health Care Workers

!  From Patients to Family Members

Why the ED�We Spread It

!  Emergency Department Infrastructure !  Overcrowding in the Waiting Room

!   Boarding in ED Hallway or Room without sufficient Ventilation Precautions

Between Patients

Why the ED�We Spread It

!  Acuity in the ED !   Intubation

!   Induced Sputum

!  Nebulized Medications

!  Atypical Presentations

PATIENTS->STAFF

Why the ED�We Spread It

!  Emergency Department staff at risk !   TST Conversion from 1-12%

!  Higher than other hospital workers

PATIENTS->STAFF

6* more likely

Why the ED�We Spread It

!   In Peru !  High prevalence of TB

!   Virtually no infection control measures

!  56% of staff baseline Quantiferon positive

!  30% of staff that had tested negative converted in one year period

PATIENTS->STAFF

A. R. Escombe, et al. Tuberculosis transmission risk and infection control in a hospital emergency department in Lima, Peru. INT J TUBERC LUNG DIS. 2010. 14(9):1120–1126

Why the ED�We Spread It

!  Patients go upstairs

!  Patients go home

PATIENTS->Family

Page 5: Tuberculosis in the ED Handout - Rutgers Universityglobaltb.njms.rutgers.edu/downloads/courses/2011...The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 6(4):332–339. April

11/4/11

5

Topics of Discussion

!  Suspicion of TB

!  Initial Management

!  Infection Control

Case #1

!  CC: Cough, fever

!  HPI: 35 y/o male with 4 days of cough productive of yellow sputum

!  PMH: None

!  Meds: None

!  Exam: Febrile, well appearing, coughing. Rales at Right Lung Base

Community-Acquired Pneumonia

!  Organisms: !   S pneumoniae

!   h flu

!   Atypicals

Ethnic Minorities Foreign Born HIV Drug Users Nursing Home Homeless Prisoners

Community-Acquired Pneumonia

!  High level Drug Resistant strep Pneumoniae

Case #2

Page 6: Tuberculosis in the ED Handout - Rutgers Universityglobaltb.njms.rutgers.edu/downloads/courses/2011...The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 6(4):332–339. April

11/4/11

6

Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Community-Acquired Pneumonia

!  Don’t we use Respiratory Fluoroquinolones to treat resistant TB??

!  Can this be a problem??

Community-Acquired Pneumonia

!  Partially treated Tuberculosis !   Delay in Diagnosis

!   Development of Resistant Tuberculosis

Fluoroquinolone Risk

Community-Acquired Pneumonia

!  Appears to be more theoretical

Fluoroquinolone Risk

Community-Acquired Pneumonia

!  Of 428 Pts diagnosed with Pulmonary Tuberculosis: !   17% of patients had been prescribed a

Fluoroquinolone in Previous 6 Months

!  Most within 90 days of diagnosis

!  Only 3/74 who had been treated had resistant TB !   All had received more than one course of

Fluoroquinolones

Fluoroquinolone Risk

Long, Richard Et Al. “Empirical Treatment of Community Acquired Pneumonia and the Development of Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Tuberculosis.” Clinical infectious Disease. 48:1354-1360. 2009.

Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Fluoroquinolone Risk

!  Among Fluoroquinolone Resistant Tuberculosis, Majority Appear to be in MDR-TB !   Likely secondary to Multi-Drug Regimen

!   Not Due to Isolated Fluoroquinolone Use in the Community

Huang TS, et al. “Trends in fluoroquinolone resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in a Taiwanese medical centre: 1995–2003.” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 56:1058–62. 2005

Page 7: Tuberculosis in the ED Handout - Rutgers Universityglobaltb.njms.rutgers.edu/downloads/courses/2011...The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 6(4):332–339. April

11/4/11

7

!  Might be a Bigger Problem if !   Prevalence of TB Increases

!   Use of fluoroquinolones Increases

!  Consider Trying Alternative Regimens

Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Fluoroquinolone Risk

Community-Acquired Pneumonia

!  Consider Missed TB if Patient Returns After Failing Course of Fluoroquinolones

Fluoroquinolone Risk

Case #3

!  46 year old homeless male, Born in Peru, complains of cough,fever, night sweats, and weakness for 1 month

Clinical Suspicion !  We Learned:

!   Cough >2 weeks Duration

!   Dyspnea

!   Fevers/chills

!  Night Sweats

!  Weight Loss

!  Hemoptysis

!  We See: !   Variable Clinical Presentation

High Suspicion of TB

!  Decision to initiate treatment !   Epidemiologic information

!   Clinical, Pathologic, and Radiologic Findings

!  Microscopic Findings of Acid Fast Bacilli

!   Cultures for Mycobacteria

High Suspicion of TB

!  Chest XRay !   Looking primarily for Active pulmonary

tuberculosis

In the Emergency Department

Page 8: Tuberculosis in the ED Handout - Rutgers Universityglobaltb.njms.rutgers.edu/downloads/courses/2011...The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 6(4):332–339. April

11/4/11

8

High Suspicion of TB

!  Sputum Sample !   Looking for AFB on Smear (Ziehl-Neelson

Stain)

!   Sensitivity of 60% in Culture Positive Pts

!   Depends on skill of lab tech

!   Depends on Bacillary Load

!   Rapid

In the Emergency Department High Suspicion of TB

!  Sputum Sample !   Looking for AFB on Smear (Ziehl-Neelson

Stain)

!   Rapid

!   Sensitivity of 60% in Culture Positive Pts

!   Depends on skill of lab tech

!   Depends on Disease Burden

!   Culture

!   Slower Results

!   Gold Standard

In the Emergency Department

High Suspicion of TB In the Emergency Department

!  Other Methods !   PPD

!  QuantiFERON® Gold

High Suspicion of TB

!  Disposition? !   Can be treated as Outpatient

!  NOT SO EASY!!

!   Not Ill Appearing

!   Appropriate Social Situation

!   Contact with Local TB program

In the Emergency Department

!  Most Will Be Admitted

Case #4

!  46 year old female, noncompliant with HIV meds, complains of cough for 1 month

Page 9: Tuberculosis in the ED Handout - Rutgers Universityglobaltb.njms.rutgers.edu/downloads/courses/2011...The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 6(4):332–339. April

11/4/11

9

Tuberculosis AND HIV

!  Occurs at ANY CD4 Count (only 11.4%of TB patients have HIV)

!  Degree of immunosuppression influences clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic presentation of TB !   CD4>350: Appears as typical TB (RUL, +/-

cavitations) !   CD4<200: Extrapulmonary manifestations,

sepsis syndrome with (-) CXR, no granulomas or cavitations, miliary TB

!  1/3 of AIDS patients have primary TB

!  2/3 have Reactivation TB !   7-10% annual risk in HIV-infected patients with

positive tuberculin skin test (TST) !   In HIV uninfected, 5-10% lifetime risk

!  Faster Progression of HIV

!  More Severe TB in HIV

Tuberculosis AND HIV

!   Sputum Smear AND culture

!  Need 3 (Decreased sensitivity when immunocompromised)

Tuberculosis AND HIV

!  Treatment Depends on Whether on ARV !   IF CD4 <50, may start ARV as well as TB Regimen

!   If CD4 50-100, Will likely start ARV after induction phase of TB Regimen

!   if CD4>200, will likely wait until after TB treatment has finished

Tuberculosis AND HIV

!  Caution if already on ARV !   Liver failure (check LFTS!)

!   IRIS

Tuberculosis AND HIV Case #5

!  CC: Back Pain

!  HPI: 19 y/o male from Vietnam with gradually increasing back pain

!  PMH: None

!  Meds: None

!  Exam: Uncomfortable, Significant Tenderness over back

Page 10: Tuberculosis in the ED Handout - Rutgers Universityglobaltb.njms.rutgers.edu/downloads/courses/2011...The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 6(4):332–339. April

11/4/11

10

More Tuberculosis

!  Can be Anywhere

!  Does NOT require isolation unless it is pulmonary or laryngeal, or in a wound that will be I&D’d

Topics of Discussion

!  Suspicion of TB

!  Initial Management

!  Infection Control

Why Bother

!  6 Fold Decrease in Development of LTBI After Beginning Infection control program with Administrative, Engineering, and Respiratory Protection elements

Behrman A, Et Al. “Tuberculosis exposure and control in an urban emergency department.” Annals Emergency Medicine. 3(3):370–5. 1998.

Back to Basics !  Spread by droplet nuclei

(airborne particles)

!  From Patients with Pulmonary or Laryngeal TB

!   Cough, Sneeze, Shout

!  Aerosolized from TB wounds !   Abscesses I&D’d

!  1-5 µm

!  Normal air currents keep particles airborne for prolonged periods

High Risk Transmission !   Exposure to TB in small, enclosed spaces

!   Inadequate local or general ventilation that results in insufficient dilution or removal of infectious droplet nuclei.

!  Recirculation of air containing infectious droplet nuclei.

!   Inadequate cleaning and disinfection of medical equipment

!   Improper procedures for handling specimens.

Hierarchy of Infection Control

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Health-Care Settings, 2005. MMWR 2005;54(No. RR-17)

Page 11: Tuberculosis in the ED Handout - Rutgers Universityglobaltb.njms.rutgers.edu/downloads/courses/2011...The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 6(4):332–339. April

11/4/11

11

Infection Control !  Administrative controls

!   reduce risk of exposure via effective IC program

!  Environmental controls: !   prevent spread and reduce concentration of

droplet nuclei

!  Respiratory protection controls: !   further reduce risk of exposure in special

areas and circumstances

Administrative Controls

!  Test and evaluate HCWs at risk for TB or for exposure to M. tuberculosis

!  Train HCWs about TB infection control

!  Ensure proper cleaning of equipment

!  Use appropriate signage advising cough etiquette and respiratory hygiene

Respiratory Protection (RP) Controls

!  Implement RP program !   Protocols

!   Training

!  Mask Fitting

!  Minimum respiratory protection is a filtering facepiece respirator !   nonpowered, air-purifying, half-facepiece,

!  N95 disposable

Environmental Controls

!   Control source of infection

!   Dilute and remove contaminated air

!   Prevent Spread of Infectious Droplet Nuclei

!   Reduce Concentration of Infectious Droplet Nuclei

!   Control airflow (clean air to less-clean air)

!   High Air Flow (At Least 6 Air Changes/Hour)

!   Air Cleaning Methods

!   High Energy Particulate Air Filtration (HEPA)

!   Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation (UVGI)

!   Negative Pressure

!   Air Exhausted to the outside

Environmental Controls Environmental Controls

!  Airborne Infection Isolation Rooms (“TB Room”)

Page 12: Tuberculosis in the ED Handout - Rutgers Universityglobaltb.njms.rutgers.edu/downloads/courses/2011...The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 6(4):332–339. April

11/4/11

12

!  1995 Most ED’s did not have adequate environmental Measures !   1.7% of Triage/Waiting Areas

!   19.6% of EDs

!  Have things changed since then??

Environmental Controls

Moran, GJ et al. “Tuberculosis infection-control practices in United States emergency departments.” Annals of Emergency Medicine. 26(3) 283-289. 1995;

Resource utilization

!  If The ED Has Isolation Rooms

!  The Trick is getting the Appropriate Patients into these Rooms

Protocols for Identifying, Evaluating, and Managing Infectious TB Patients

Triage

!  Important and Vulnerable point of Entry into the ED and the Hospital

!  Effective Strategy here will Minimize Nosocomial Infections Throughout ED and Entire Hospital

Triage

!  Initial Patient Encounter

!  Consider Infection Control Measures on Arrival !  Masking

!   ED Isolation Room

!  Notification of Staff Members

Difficulties

!  Triage Procedures Have met with Limited Success !   In Sensitivity

!   In Specificity

!  Problem is that Talking to the Patient is Just Not Sufficient

Plan?

!  Mask Everybody With a Cough !   Droplet Precautions Sufficient for most

Bacteria/Viruses

!   Large Droplets

!   Don’t Remain Suspended in the Air

!  “TB Rooms” for Those with high-risk epidemiologic factors

!  High-Risk Procedures Done only in Rooms with Non-Recirculated Air

Page 13: Tuberculosis in the ED Handout - Rutgers Universityglobaltb.njms.rutgers.edu/downloads/courses/2011...The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 6(4):332–339. April

11/4/11

13

Admission to Hospital

!  If ED Does not have Isolation Room: !   Rapid Identification of possible Cases

and Rapid Admission to Hospital Bed

Admission to Hospital

!  If ED Does have Isolation Room: !   Screen High-Risk patients in ED to

Determine Who Needs an Isolation Bed

Decision Instrument !  History of Tuberculosis

!  Immigrant

!  Homeless

!  History of Incarceration

!  Recent Weight Loss

!  Chest Radiograph with Apical Infiltrate

!  Chest Radiograph With Cavitary Lesion

Moran, Gregory G et al. “Decision Instrument for the Isolation of Pneumonia patients with Suspected Tuberculosis Admitted Through US Emergency Departments.” Annals of Emergency Medicine. 53(5) 2009

Decision Instrument

!  Sensitivity: 96.4%

!  Specificity: 48.7%

Decision Instrument

!  Effectiveness (Post-test Probability) will always depend on your prevalance !   Peru

!  High prevalence area, not found to be sufficient

!   Urgent care area that has never had a case of TB

!   You will be isolating a large number of ultimately negative pts

Lely Solari, et al. Evaluation of Clinical Prediction Rules for Respiratory Isolation of Inpatients with Suspected Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2011;52(5):595–603.

What Have We Learned


Recommended