Two-Pronged Screening Approach to Increase Coverage
A Case-Study in Dollo Ado Camps, Ethiopia
From Relief to Self-Reliance
Nutrition and Food Security DepartmentDaniel Takea, Alexandra Rutishauser-Perera,
Caroline [email protected]
All content in this document is the property of International Medical Corps and should not be reproduced without prior written consent.
IMC program in Dollo Addo
CMAM in 2 camps: 4 Community Nutrition Centers in both Melkadida and Kobe (8 in total)• OTP: 608 Admissions of SAM U5 (Jan-Aug 2013)
Point Coverage in August 2013: 88.7%• TSFP : 1,904 Admissions of MAM U5 (Jan-Aug 2013)
Point Coverage in August 2013: 92.5%• BSFP : Enrolled 8,043 U5 and 3,184 PLW (Jan-Aug 2013)• SC : Referral to Government health center+ IYCF/ECD Preventive activities
Screening Methodology
• MUAC Screening only Monthly• 2 pronged screening approach Quarterly
Screening
• Children with MUAC 11.5-12.49 cm are admitted to the targeted supplementary feeding program (TSFP) while
• children with MUAC <11.5 cm are admitted to the outpatient therapeutic feeding program (OTP).
Screening
• WHZ is measured on children in the “at-risk” category, MUAC between 12.5 and 13.5 cm for children 6-23 months and 12.5-14.5 cm for children 24-59 months.
• Children with WHZ >3SD and <-2SD are admitted to TSFP and children with WHZ <-3 are admitted to OTP, regardless of their MUAC.
Kobe: Screening May 2013• Identified with GAM by MUAC 86 children or 6.4% of 6-23M 18 children or 0.4% of 24-59M
• Identified by WFH (from MUAC at-risk) 169 children or 30.1% (6-23m) 390 children or 29.8% (24-59m)
Based on the two-step screening protocol 255 children or 19.0% (6-23 m)408 children or 7.9% (24-59 m)
Melkadida: Screening May 2013• Identified with GAM by MUAC 20 children or 1% ( 6-23m) 11 children or 0.3% ( 24-59m)
• Identified by WFH (from MUAC at-risk) 109 children or 25.3% (6-23m) 161 children or 22.4% (24-59m)
Based on the two-step screening protocol 129 children or 6.8% (6-23 m)172 children or 4.1% (24-59 m)
Recommendation 1 :
At health facility level (fixed or mobile), there should be systematic case finding by MUAC to identify children requiring management of SAM. If a child is not identified by MUAC, WHZ should be measured where it is feasible (capacity in terms of materials, time and trained human resources) without jeopardizing other essential health services.
• In Somali populations in Dollo Ado refugee camps it is clearly important to screen for acute malnutrition using both MUAC and WHZ.
• In July 2013, International Medical Corps has initiated a monthly two-step screening protocol for acute malnutrition in both camps.
Practical Implications
• In camp versus non camp setting
• Availability of resources (trained human and material) to use the two-pronged screening
• Availability and capacity of treatment programs to absorb the cases.