1
Type I and II Ground Disturbing Categorical Exclusion Action Classification Form
STIP Project No. B-4479
WBS Element 38384.1.FD2
Federal Project No. BRZ-1700(17)
A. Project Description:
The proposed project involves the replacement of Bridge Numbers 222, 226, 228 and 230 carrying SR 1700 (Red Hill Road) over Red Hill Swamp, in Columbus County. The project is included in the 2016-2025 North Carolina State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The project location is shown in Figure 1 in Appendix A. Photos of the site are shown in Figures 2 and 3 in Appendix A. Functional design plans are included in Appendix A as Figures 4 – 6. Right of way acquisition and construction for the project are scheduled to begin in federal fiscal years 2018 and 2019, respectively, in the draft 2017-2027 STIP.
B. Description of Need and Purpose: The purpose of the proposed project is to replace four obsolete bridges. Bridge Nos. 222, 226, 228, and 230 are all structurally deficient and functionally obsolete. The table below presents information regarding the existing bridges.
Bridge No. 222 226 228 230
Crosses Red Hill Swamp
Red Hill Swamp
Red Hill Swamp
Red Hill Swamp
Year Built 1947 1949 1949 1949
Clear Roadway Width 24 feet 24 feet 24 feet 24 feet
Length 70 feet 74 feet 74 feet 56 feet
Sufficiency Rating 22.47 24.6 25.36 25.36
Functionally Obsolete?
Yes (Structural
Appraisal=3)
Yes (Structural
Appraisal=4)
Yes (Structural
Appraisal=4)
Yes (Structural
Appraisal=2)
Structurally Deficient?
Yes (Substructure Condition=3)
Yes (Substructure Condition=3)
Yes (Substructure Condition=3)
Yes (Substructure Condition=2)
Posted Weight Limit 22 tons SV 32 tons TTST
16 tons SV 24 tons TTST
18 tons SV 25 tons TTST
18 tons SV 27 tons TTST
2
C. Categorical Exclusion Action Classification: (Check one)
☒ TYPE I
☐ TYPE II
D. Proposed Improvements 28. Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of grade
separation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings, if the actions meet the constraints in 23 CFR 771.117(e)(1-6).
E. Special Project Information:
A vicinity map showing the location of the four bridges and the detour route is included in Appendix A as Figure 1. Photographs of the bridges are included in Appendix A as Figures 2 and 3. NCDOT has sought input from the following agencies as a part of the project development: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, NC Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, N.C Wildlife Resources Commission, NC Division of Water Quality, and the Environmental Protection Agency. No special concerns were expressed by any of the agencies contacted. Estimated Costs: The estimated costs, based on 2017 prices, are as follows: R/W: $ 37,000.00 Const: $3,100,000.00 Utilities: $ 0.00 Total: $3,137,000.00 Estimated Traffic: Year 2012 450 vehicles per day (vpd) Year 2035 900 vpd Accidents: Eleven crashes occurred in the vicinity of the project during a recent three-year period. None were associated with the geometry of the bridge or its approach roadways. Design Exceptions: There are no anticipated design exceptions for this project. Proposed Bridge Length: The proposed bridge lengths for Bridge Nos. 222, 226, and 228 is 90 feet. The proposed bridge length for Bridge No. 230 is 75 feet. The clear roadway width on each bridge will be 30 feet 10 inches. Pedestrian and Bicycle Accommodations: SR 1700 is not a designated bicycle route, nor does it have any pedestrian accommodations. Offsite Detour: Bridge Nos. 222, 226, 228, and 230 will be replaced on the existing alignment. Traffic will be detoured offsite (see Figure 1) during the construction period. NCDOT Guidelines for Evaluation of Offsite Detours for Bridge Replacement Projects considers multiple project variables beginning with the additional time traveled by the average road user resulting from the offsite detour. The offsite detour for this project would include SR 1700, SR 1701, SR 1702, SR 1758, NC 211, and US 701 Business. The majority of traffic on the road is through traffic. The detour for the average road user would
3
result in 15 minutes additional travel time (nine miles additional travel). Up to a 24-month construction duration is expected for this project. Public Involvement: A landowner notification letter and a newsletter were sent to all property owners affected directly by this project. Property owners were invited to comment. No comments have been received to date. Northern long-eared bat (NLEB): The US Fish and Wildlife Service has developed a programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration, the US Army Corps of Engineers and NCDOT, for the NLEB in eastern North Carolina. The PBO covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and activities. The programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8 is “May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect.” The PBO will provide incidental take coverage for NLEB and will ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for five years for all NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which includes Columbus County.
4
F. Project Impact Criteria Checklists:
Type I & II - Ground Disturbing Actions
FHWA APPROVAL ACTIVITIES THRESHOLD CRITERIA
If any of questions 1-7 are marked “yes” then the CE will require FHWA approval. Yes No
1 Does the project require formal consultation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)? ☐ ☒
2 Does the project result in impacts subject to the conditions of the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA)? ☐ ☒
3 Does the project generate substantial controversy or public opposition, for any reason, following appropriate public involvement? ☐ ☒
4 Does the project cause disproportionately high and adverse impacts relative to low-income and/or minority populations? ☐ ☒
5 Does the project involve a residential or commercial displacement, or a substantial amount of right of way acquisition? ☐ ☒
6 Does the project require an Individual Section 4(f) approval? ☐ ☒
7
Does the project include adverse effects that cannot be resolved with a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) or have an adverse effect on a National Historic Landmark (NHL)?
☐ ☒
If any of questions 8 through 31 are marked “yes” then additional information will be required for those questions in Section G.
Other Considerations Yes No
8 Does the project result in a finding of “may affect not likely to adversely affect” for listed species, or designated critical habitat under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA)?
☒ ☐
9 Is the project located in anadromous fish spawning waters? ☐ ☒
10
Does the project impact waters classified as Outstanding Resource Water
(ORW), High Quality Water (HQW), Water Supply Watershed Critical Areas, 303(d) listed impaired water bodies, buffer rules, or Submerged
Aquatic Vegetation (SAV)?
☐ ☒
11 Does the project impact waters of the United States in any of the designated mountain trout streams?
☐ ☒
12 Does the project require a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Individual Section 404 Permit?
☒ ☐
13 Will the project require an easement from a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) licensed facility?
☐ ☒
14 Does the project include a Section 106 of the NHPA effects determination other than a no effect, including archaeological remains? ☐ ☒
5
Other Considerations (continued) Yes No
15 Does the project involve hazardous materials and/or landfills? ☐ ☒
16
Does the project require work encroaching and adversely affecting a regulatory floodway or work affecting the base floodplain (100-year flood) elevations of a water course or lake, pursuant to Executive Order 11988 and 23 CFR 650 subpart A?
☒ ☐
17 Is the project in a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) county and substantially affects the coastal zone and/or any Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
☐ ☒
18 Does the project require a U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) permit? ☐ ☒
19 Does the project involve construction activities in, across, or adjacent to a designated Wild and Scenic River present within the project area? ☐ ☒
20 Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) resources? ☐ ☒
21 Does the project impact federal lands (e.g. U.S. Forest Service (USFS), USFWS, etc.) or Tribal Lands? ☐ ☒
22 Does the project involve any changes in access control? ☐ ☒
23 Does the project have a permanent adverse effect on local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness? ☐ ☒
24 Will maintenance of traffic cause substantial disruption? ☐ ☒
25 Is the project inconsistent with the STIP or the Metropolitan Planning Organization’s (MPO’s) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) (where applicable)?
☐ ☒
26
Does the project require the acquisition of lands under the protection of Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act, the Federal Aid in Fish Restoration Act, the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act, Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), or other unique areas or special lands that were acquired in fee or easement with public-use money and have deed restrictions or covenants on the property?
☐ ☒
27 Does the project involve Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) buyout properties under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)? ☐ ☒
28 Does the project include a de minimis or programmatic Section 4(f)? ☐ ☒
29 Is the project considered a Type I under the NCDOT's Noise Policy? ☐ ☒
30 Is there prime or important farmland soil impacted by this project as defined by the Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA)? ☐ ☒
31 Are there other issues that arose during the project development process that affected the project decision? ☐ ☒
G. Additional Documentation as Required from Section F
Response to Question 8: Wood Stork: There is habitat for the wood stork within the study area. The species was not observed during field investigations performed on March 17, 2015 (an additional survey will be conducted during the revised US Fish and Wildlife Service survey window of April 15, 2017 to July 15, 2017). A review of the NCNHP records on May 20, 2015 indicates no occurrences within one mile of the study area. Biological Conclusion: May Affect - Not Likely to Adversely Effect
6
Response to Question 12:
Anticipated Permits: The proposed project will affect 4.06 acres of wetlands based on an area of 20 feet outside of the slope stakes. A Nationwide permit (NWP) 23 (33 CFR 330.5(a) 23)) may be applicable for impacts to “Waters of the United States” resulting from this project. Other permits that may apply include a NWP 33 for temporary construction activities such as stream dewatering, work bridges, or temporary causeways may be required during bridge construction. However, it is possible that an Individual Section 404 Permit could be required. The US Army Corps of Engineers holds the final discretion as to what permit will be required to authorize project construction. The corresponding Section 401 Water Quality Certification(s) (WQC) from the NCDWR will also be needed.
Response to Question 16: Columbus County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program, administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Based on the most current information available from the NC Floodplain Mapping Program (FMP), these stream crossings are in a designated flood hazard zone. The proposed bridge replacements will provide equivalent or greater conveyance than that of the existing bridges. The Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the FMP, the delegated state agency administering FEMA’s National Flood Insurance Program, to determine the status of the project with regard to applicability of NCDOT’S Memorandum of Agreement with FMP, or approval of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and subsequent final Letter of Map Revision (LOMR). This project involves construction activities on or adjacent to a FEMA-regulated stream. Therefore, the Division shall submit sealed as-built construction plans to the Hydraulics Unit upon completion of project construction, certifying the drainage structures and roadway embankment located within the 100-year floodplain were built as shown in the construction plans, both horizontally and vertically.
7
H. Project Commitments
Columbus County Bridge Numbers 222, 226, 228 and 230
Carrying SR 1700 (Red Hill Road) over Red Hill Swamp Federal-Aid Project BRZ-1700(17)
WBS No. 38384.1.FD2 STIP Project B-4479
Division Six Construction, Resident Engineer’s Office Columbus County Emergency Services will be contacted at (910) 640-3049 at least one month prior to road closure to make the necessary temporary reassignments to primary response units. Columbus County Schools will be contacted at (910) 642-2586 at least one month prior to road closure to allow temporary rerouting of school buses. This project involves construction activities on or adjacent to a FEMA-regulated stream. Therefore, the Division shall submit sealed as-built construction plans to the Hydraulics Unit upon completion of project construction, certifying the drainage structures and roadway embankment located within the 100-year floodplain were built as shown in the construction plans, both horizontally and vertically. Hydraulics Unit The Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the Floodplain Mapping Program, the delegated state agency administering FEMA’s National Flood Insurance Program, to determine the status of the project with regard to applicability of NCDOT’S Memorandum of Agreement with FMP, or approval of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and subsequent final Letter of Map Revision (LOMR). Natural Environment Section An additional survey for the federally-listed wood stork will be conducted during the revised US Fish and Wildlife Service survey window of April 15, 2017 to July 15, 2017.
8
I. Categorical Exclusion Approval
STIP Project No. B-4479
WBS Element 38384.1.FD2
Federal Project No. BRZ-1700(17)
Prepared By:
Date Stephen C. Greene, P.E., Vice President Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Prepared For: Joseph H. Miller, PE, Project Planning Engineer Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit North Carolina Department of Transportation Reviewed By:
Date James McInnis, Jr., PE, Project Engineer Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit North Carolina Department of Transportation
☒ Approved If all of the threshold questions (1 through 7) of Section F are answered “no,” NCDOT approves this Categorical Exclusion.
☐ Certified If any of the threshold questions (1 through 7) of Section F are answered “yes,” NCDOT certifies this Categorical Exclusion.
Date James McInnis, Jr., PE, Project Engineer North Carolina Department of Transportation FHWA Approved: For Projects Certified by NCDOT (above), FHWA signature
required. N/A
Date John F. Sullivan, III, PE, Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration
5/18/2017
5/18/2017
5/18/2017
APPENDIX A
Rico
Mt. Zion
Ch.
Bra
nch
Mable
Spaulding Rd.
Gre
ene
Rd.
Red
Hill
Rd.
Red
Hill
Rd.
Sessio
nRd.
Tart
Rd.
Charle
yLennon
Rd.
Jenkins
Rd.
Jenkins
Rd.
Hallsboro
Rd.
Hallsboro
Rd.Rico
Rd.
Rico Rd.
CreedSt.
Rehobeth C
hurc
h R
d.
1702
1702
1720
1720
1702
17021702
1542
1543
1700
1700
1700
1701
1700
1544
1723
1723
1721
1001
1001 1724
1741
1722
1722
1720
1762
Red
Hill
Swamp
701BUS
701BYP
701
.10
.17
.05
.05
1.48
701
1.13College
St.
Green
St.
RAILROAD
Sch.
New Jerusalem
Church
1757
1001
1758
1759
1710
1167
1168
1190
1166
1166
1168
1166
1001
1755
1710
Rd.
Page
Ford
Rd.
Brid
gers
Rd.
Page
Rd.
Burney
Bluefield
Page
Rd.
Tart Rd.
Lanier
Rd.
Baldwin-Elkins
Rd.
Rico
Rd.
Halls
boro
Rd.
Porterville
Quill
Perimeter
Rd.
W.
Peach
St.
David
St.
Calla
han MHP
Rd.
S.S
mith
St.
N.
Cox
St.
Hester
St.
Gooden
St.
Melvin
St.
N.Page
Rd.
Elm
St.
Shurm
ac
St.
W.S.Railroad
St.
Graham
St.
Elm
St.
N.
CurrieSt.
Mitc
hell-
Ford
Rd.
E.
Robert
St.
Sin
gletary
Rd.
E.GrahamSt.
W.
E.
Currie St.
Virginia
Ave.
Church
St.
Ca
mpbell
St.
Gro
ve
St.
Clark
St.
6th
St.
Elm
hurst
St.
Edge
wood
St.
McKoy
State
nRd.
Little John
Rd.
George
W.
Kelly
Rd.
1.4
.63
.37
.14
.07
.61
1.3
.9
Elkton
Elkton
Slades
Swamp
70BYP
70BUS
BAY
RAVEN
Clarkton
Pop. 796
211
FIGURE 1Not to Scale
Bridge Location
Columbus Co.
N
LOCATION MAP
PROJECT
TIP NO. B-4479
OF TRANSPO
RT
ATIO
N
ANI
LO
R
AC
HTRONFOE
T
AT
S
DE
PA
RT
ME
NT
Detour Route
Bridge No. 222
Bridge No. 226
Bridge No. 228
Bridge No. 230
Columbus County
over Red Hill Swamp
on SR 1700 (Red Hill Road)
Bridge Nos. 222, 226, 228 and 230
-B
L- 2
-B
L- 1
T
TT
T
HH
T
MARKER
FOMARKERFO
MARKER
FOMARKERFO
72 str
200 pr300 pr
72 str
300 pr
200 pr
100 pr
72 str
200 pr
200 pr
48 str
50 pr 300 pr
50 pr
Century Link
Century Link
50 pr
WOODS
WOODS
INV=66.84’
INV=68.13’
INV=68.94’
INV=72.43’
18"
RCP
18" RCP
BRG 222
WW
7’ CONC
WW
7’ CONC
WW
7’ CONCWW
7’ CONC
TO BALDWIN RD.
TO ANDREW JACKSON H
WY W 74/76
SR 1700 (RED HILL RD)
18’ BSTSR 1701 (GREEN ELKINS RD)
10’ S
OIL
10’ S
OIL
S 56°0
3’42" E
1146.00
’
S 88°2
6’18"
W
160.5
0’
EIP
S 56°03’42" E23.24’
ETHERIDGE, JR
JEFF D.
DB 642 PG 636
LEONARD B. WHITE
DB 436 PG 134
LEONARD B. WHITE
DB 430 PG 587
ELKINS, JR
EDISON JULIUS
DB 577 PG 607
EDISON JULIUS ELKINS, JR
DB 577 PG 607 LEVY HOWARD JONES
DB 887 PG 804
PB 71 PG 47
RONALD ERWIN WHITE
DB 1084 PG 112
EXIST R/W
EXIST R/W
EXIST R/W
EXIST R/W
EXIST R/W
EXIST R/W
ASS
UM
ED E
XIS
T
R/
W
ASS
UM
ED E
XIS
T
R/
W
ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION
BRIDGE TYPICAL SECTION
30’-10"
11’ 11’
POINT
GRADE
4’-5"
1’
1"
33’ OUT-TO-OUT WIDTH11 PRESTRESSED CONC. CORED SLAB UNITS
1"
1’
4’-5"
CL-L-
FOR BRIDGE 222 OVER RED HILL SWAMP
0.04 0.04
2 3/4"
6’ 11’ 11’ 6’ 8’
9’w/GR
3:14:10.08 0.02 0.02 0.08
4:1
3:1SLOPE
VARIABLE
POINT
GRADE
FDPS
2’
FDPS
2’
CL-L-
ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION
6’ 6’ 8’
4:10.08 0.02 0.02 0.08
4:1
3:1SLOPE
VARIABLE POINT
GRADE
CL
3:1
-Y-
-L- STA. 10+00.00 TO 50+50.00
VARIES VARIES11’ TO 15’11’ TO 15’
-Y- STA. 10+00.00 TO 13+29.15
9’w/GR
FOR -L- PROFILE, SEE SHEET NO. 7
4
FOR -Y- PROFILE, SEE SHEET NO. 8
SEE SH
EET 5
MA
TC
HLIN
E -L- STA. 24+
00.0
0
PI Sta 12+37.46
D
L = 182.05’
T = 95.27’
R = 250.00’
-L-
-Y-
PI Sta 13+24.27
L = 407.40’
T = 204.15’
R = 2,500.00’
PI Sta 22+14.08
D
L = 387.45’
T = 195.43’
R = 1,200.00’
15+00 20+00
-Y- P
C Sta. 11
+42.19
-Y- PT Sta. 13+24.24
-L-
PO
T
Sta. 10
+00.0
0
-
L-
PC Sta. 11+20.12
-
L-
PT
Sta. 15
+27.5
2
-
L-
PC Sta. 20+18.6
5
-L- P
CC Sta. 24+06.10
-Y- P
OT Sta. 10+
00.00
Runoff= 100’ Runoff = 100’
e = .04 e = .04
NAD 83/ 95
RUNOFF = 68
e = .04
D
BR 222
ELKINS ROAD
SR 1701 GREEN
.03
.04
.03
.02
.01
.00
.00
.01
.03
.04
.02
.03
.04
.03
.02
.02
.02
.02
.01
.02
.02
.02
.02
.01
.02
.02
.02
.02
.03
.04
.00
.01
.02
.03
.04
.03
.02
.01
.00.00
.01
.02
.02
.01
.02
.02
.02
.03
.04
.03
.02
11’11’
.01
.01
.02R=30’R=30’
+04.2
5
+95.7
5
11’
11’
.02
.01
.02
.02
.00.0
2
.01.0
2
.02
.02 .04
.04
25’
25’
25’
.02
.02
17’
.04.04
+62.86
+33.57
17’
(TYP.)
+94.19
+03.4
5
+01.98
.04
.04
2’ FDPS
2’ FDPS
(TYP.)
11’
11’
11’
11’
15’15’
2’ FDPS
2’ FDPS(TYP.)
-Y- STA. 10+00.00BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
(TYP.)
(TYP.)
-Y- POT STA. 13+70.56-L- POC STA. 12+50.00=
110’ TR
AN
SITIO
N
-L- STA.10+00.00BEGIN PROJECT B-4479
11’
11’
TAPER LT
&
RT
SR 1700 RED HILL ROAD
RED HILL SWAMP
BROWN MARSH SWAMP
(TYP)GRAU-350
(TYP)TYPE-III
F
F
F
C
F
C
F
CC
F
C
F
CC
F
F
F
F
F
C
C
C
F
F
C
C
F
C
F
F
F
RE
VISIO
NS
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
3/15/2017
...\
Proj\
B4479_
Rdy_psh04.d
gn
User: bpalis
8/17/99
INCOMPLETE PLANSDO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
HYDRAULICS
B-4479
ENGINEER
0’ 50’ 100’50’ 25’
BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB
WITH OFFSITE DETOUR
REPLACE IN PLACE
B-4479
COLUMBUS COUNTY
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RAMEY KEMP
Transportation Engineers
www.rameykemp.com
Phone: 919-872-5115
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100
ASSOCIATES, INC.&
NC License No. C-0910
-B
L- 4
-B
L- 3
TT
MARKERFO
MARKERFO
200 pr
Century Link
Century Link
WOODS
WOODS
20’ S
OIL
WOODS
BRG 228
WW
11’ WD
WW
11’ WD
WW
7’ WD
WW
9’ WD
BRG 226
WW
9’ CONC
WW
9’ CONC
WW
9’ CONC
WW
9’ CONC
ELEV 65.51’29’ RIGHT
BL STA 11+47BM#1
SR 1700 (RED HILL RD)
17.5’ BST
HISTORIC CYPRESS TREE
DB 887 PG 804
N 26°34’0
9" E
681.0
8’
N 61°4
8’3
2" E
315
1.49’
LEVY HOWARD JONES
PB 71 PG 47
RONALD ERWIN WHITE
DB 1084 PG 112
PAEJ PROPERTIES, LLC
PB 71 PG 47
DB 1086 PG 322
IRREVOCABLE TRUST
MARY GERTRUDE EVANS
DB 538 PG 078
EXIST R/W
EXIST R/W
EXIST R/W
EXIST R/W
ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTIONBRIDGE TYPICAL SECTION
30’-10"
11’ 11’
POINT
GRADE
4’-5"
1’
1"
33’ OUT-TO-OUT WIDTH11 PRESTRESSED CONC. CORED SLAB UNITS
1"
1’
4’-5"
CL-L-
BRIDGE TYPICAL SECTION
30’-10"
11’ 11’ 4’-5"
1’
1"
33’ OUT-TO-OUT WIDTH11 PRESTRESSED CONC. CORED SLAB UNITS
1"
1’
4’-5"
CL-L-
0.02 0.02
POINT
GRADE
2 3/4" MIN
FOR BRIDGE 226 OVER RED HILL SWAMP
0.02 0.02
2 3/4"
6’ 11’ 11’ 6’ 8’
9’w/GR
3:14:10.08 0.02 0.02 0.08
4:1
3:1SLOPE
VARIABLE
POINT
GRADE
FDPS
2’
FDPS
2’
CL-L-
-L- STA. 10+00.00 TO 50+50.00FOR BRIDGE 228 OVER RED HILL SWAMP
FOR -L- PROFILE, SEE SHEET NO. 7
5
SEE S
HEET 4
MA
TC
HLIN
E -L- STA. 2
4+
00.0
0
SEE S
HEET 6
MA
TC
HLIN
E -L- STA. 38+
00.0
0
5
25+0030+00 35+00
-L-
PC
C Sta. 24+06.10
-L-
PT
Sta. 26+46.10
NAD 83/ 95
PI Sta 22+14.08
D
L = 387.45’
T = 195.43’
R = 1,200.00’
PI Sta 25+26.28
D
L = 240.00’
T = 120.18’
R = 1,800.00’
-L-
e = .04
Runoff = 100’
e = .04
Runoff = 100’
.04
.03
.01
.00
.04
.03
.02
.02
.01
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
+75.0
0
25’
11’
11’
.02
.02
11’
11’
(TYP.)
25’
(TYP.)
+25.0
0
2’ FDPS
2’ FDPS
2’ FDPS
2’ FDPS
.04
.04
RED HILL SWAMP
BROWN MARSH SWAMP
SR 1700 RED HILL ROAD
BR 228BR 226 (TYP)GRAU-350
(TYP)TYPE-III
(TYP)TYPE-III
(TYP)GRAU-350
DO NOT DISTURB TREE
F
F
F
F
FF
F
CC
F
F
F
FC
FC
F
F
F
F
RE
VISIO
NS
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
3/15/2017
...\
Proj\
B4479_
Rdy_psh05.d
gn
User: bpalis
8/17/99
INCOMPLETE PLANSDO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
HYDRAULICS
B-4479
ENGINEER
0’ 50’ 100’50’ 25’
BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB
WITH OFFSITE DETOUR
REPLACE IN PLACE
B-4479
COLUMBUS COUNTY
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RAMEY KEMP
Transportation Engineers
www.rameykemp.com
Phone: 919-872-5115
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100
ASSOCIATES, INC.&
NC License No. C-0910
-B
L- 7
-B
L- 6
-B
L- 5
HH
T
MARKERFO
Century Link, 50 pr
Century Link Abandoned - Unk Size
Century Link, 150 pr
Century Link, 100 pr
50 pr
Abandoned - Unk Size
150 pr
100 pr72 str
200 pr
72 str
Century Link
Century Link
Century Link
200 pr
72 str
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
WW
10’ WD
WW
11’ WD WW
7’ WD
BRG 230
WW
8’ WD
TO BUS 701
17.5’ BST
SR 1700 (RED HILL RD)
MARKERFO
ELEV 67.86’40’ RIGHT
BL STA 37+41BM#2
ANGELA CAMPBELL BEAN
DB 938 PG 148
PB 19 PG 53
ROBERT DENNING WHITE
DB 1084 PG 106
PB 56 PG 61
N 46°2
7’4
4" E
881.0
6’
EIP
S 46°5
0’3
6" W
230.2
8’
N 43
°55’51" W
1278.18’
PAEJ PROPERTIES, LLC
DB 1086 PG 322
PB 71 PG 47
DB 538 PG 078
IRREVOCABLE TRUST
MARY GERTRUDE EVANS
EXIST R/W
EXIST R/W
EXIST R/W
EXIST R/W
ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTIONBRIDGE TYPICAL SECTION
30’-10"
11’ 11’ 4’-5"
1’
1"
33’ OUT-TO-OUT WIDTH11 PRESTRESSED CONC. CORED SLAB UNITS
1"
1’
4’-5"
CL-L-
0.02 0.02
POINT
GRADE
2 3/4" MIN
6’ 11’ 11’ 6’ 8’
9’w/GR
3:14:10.08 0.02 0.02 0.08
4:1
3:1SLOPE
VARIABLE
POINT
GRADE
FDPS
2’
FDPS
2’
CL-L-
-L- STA. 10+00.00 TO 50+50.00FOR BRIDGE 230 OVER RED HILL SWAMP
FOR -L- PROFILE, SEE SHEET NO. 7
SEE S
HEET 5
MA
TC
HLIN
E -L- STA. 38+
00.0
0
6
-L-
40+00 45+00
50+00-L-
PC Sta. 42
+14.7
1
-L-
PT
Sta. 44+46.8
9
-L-
PC Sta. 49+01.07
-L-
PT
Sta. 50+13.8
0
NAD 83/ 95
e = NC
PI Sta 43+30.80
D
L = 232.18’
T = 116.09’
R = 11,459.16’
PI Sta 49+57.43
D
L = 112.73’
T = 56.37’
R = 11,459.16’
e = NC
BR 230
11’
11’
.02
.02
2’ FDPS
2’ FDPS
.02
.02
11’
11’
SR 1700 RED HILL ROAD
RED HILL SWAMP
BROWN MARSH SWAMP
-L- 50+50.00END PROJECT B-4479
(TYP)TYPE-III
(TYP)GRAU-350
2’ FDPS
2’ FDPSF
F
F
F
F
F
F
FF
RE
VISIO
NS
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
3/15/2017
...\
Proj\
B4479_
Rdy_psh06.d
gn
User: bpalis
8/17/99
INCOMPLETE PLANSDO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
HYDRAULICS
B-4479
ENGINEER
0’ 50’ 100’50’ 25’
BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB
WITH OFFSITE DETOUR
REPLACE IN PLACE
B-4479
COLUMBUS COUNTY
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RAMEY KEMP
Transportation Engineers
www.rameykemp.com
Phone: 919-872-5115
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100
ASSOCIATES, INC.&
NC License No. C-0910