+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Type II Aerobic Methane Oxidizing Bacteria (AMOB) Drive ... · The concentration profiles of AMOB...

Type II Aerobic Methane Oxidizing Bacteria (AMOB) Drive ... · The concentration profiles of AMOB...

Date post: 28-Jan-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Template provided by: “posters4researc Type II Aerobic Methane Oxidizing Bacteria (AMOB) Drive Methane Oxidation in Pulsed Wetlands as Indicated by 13 C-Phospholipid Fatty Acid Composition Taniya Roy Chowdhury* a and Richard P. Dick a a School of Environment & Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, U.S.A. THE OLENTANGY RIVER “Kidney” WETLANDS, Ohio, U.S.A. Soil Sampling Locations (Fig. 3) and Factors: Factor Number Name Landscape 2 ORW1,ORW2 Hydrology 3 Permanently Flooded (PF) Intermittently Flooded (IF) Upland (UP) Flow zones 2 Inflow (I), Outflow (O) Soil Depth 2 0-8 cm 816 cm Season 4 Fall, Winter, Spring, Summer RESULTS: Potential Methane Oxidation The magnitude of climate change predicted for the United States over the next 100 years will cause significant impacts on temperature and precipitation patterns Wetlands are a major source (~25 %) of methane globally 1 Aerobic Methane Oxidizing Bacteria (AMOB) have the unique ability to utilize CH 4 as the sole source of carbon and energy by the Methane Mono Oxygenase (MMO) mediated reaction A variety of environmental determinants have been implicated in the dominance of AMOB type. Generally, type I AMOB outcompete type II AMOB in low CH 4 (~2ppmv), high oxygen environments, while type II AMOB are favored in high CH 4 (≥40ppmv) environments 2 AMOB are active at the oxic sediment - water interface (“pulsing fringe”, Fig. 2) AMOB consume ~30 Tg-CH 4 -yr -1 , and potentially can offset CH 4 losses to the atmosphere 1 Very little is known about the effects of pulsing hydrology and season on the AMOB ecology Therefore, the Objectives of this Study were: Experiment 1:Determine the effects of Season and Landscape position on Potential Methane Oxidation (PMO) in the two wetlands Experiment 2:Determine the effects of Season and Landscape position on the Aerobic Methane Oxidizing Bacteria (AMOB) as reflected by their biomarker Phospholipid Fatty Acid (PLFA) Compositions INTRODUCTION WETLAND HYDROLOGY EXPERIMENT 1. Whalen, S.C. (2005). Environ. Eng. Sc. 22(1):73-92 2. Hanson, R.S., and Hanson, T.E. (1996). Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 60:439–471 3. Jahnke, L. L., R. E. Summons, J. M. Hope, and Des Marais, D.J. (1999). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 63:79-93 4. Altor, A. E. and Mitsch, W.J.. (2006). Ecological Engineering 28: 224-234. 5. Crossman, Z.M., Abraham, F., Evershed, R.P. (2004). Environ.Sc. & Tech. 38: 359–1367 6. Maxfield, P. J., E. R. C. Hornibrook and Evershed, R.P. (2006). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 3901-3907 Effect of Pulsing on Methane Emission in the Olentangy River Wetlands 4 (Altor and Mitsch, 2006) E Exposed Average Inundated Average Average Methane Flux (mg CH 4 -cm -2 h -1 ) 5 1 Intermittently Flooded (IF) with emergent macrophytes Intermittently Flooded (IF) without emergent macrophytes Permanently Flooded (PF) 10 • Effect of pulsing on Methane emission in the two 1-ha experimental Olentangy River Wetlands • Methane fluxes in IF zones of the wetlands were 30% of those in the PF wetland areas (Fig. 1) Zone of Anaerobic Methanogenesis Oxic Sediment-Water-Interface: the “Pulsing” fringe O2 O2 Wetland – “Kidney” of the Ecosytems Methane Fig. 2. Illustration of the Oxygen rich “pulsing fringe” in a Wetland O 2 Fig.1 Figs. 4 & 5:Seasonal average PMO across landscape positions: PMO in Winter significantly higher than in Summer (p< 0.01) PMO statistically higher at 0-8 cm depth of soil in the PF and IF sites (p< 0.05) • Soil samples injected with known concentration of 99.99% pure CH 4 gas • PMO reported in nmol-CH 4 .gdwt. -1 Soil.h -1 Measure linear decrease in CH 4 concentration over time (7h) using GC-FID CH 4 CO 2 Soil Slurry Std. CH 4 Method 1: Potential Methane Oxidation (PMO), Crossman et al. (2004) 99.99 % 13 CH 4 Air Mixing Chamber 13 C H 4 13 C H 4 PLFA Analysis by GC-c-IRMS Method 2: 13 CH 4 Incubation Pulse-Chase Experimental Setup: Stable Isotope Probing of PLFA using GC-c-IRMS, Maxfield et al., 2006 Fingerprint AMOB PLFAs: Type I AMOB: 16:1ω5c, 16:1ω7c Type II AMOB:18:1ω7c, 18:1ω9c 18:1ω8c Soils Incubated under two different concentrations of 13 CH 4 : 2ppmv and 60ppmv i. “Type I AMOB”: [CH 4 ] <1.8 ppm ii. “Type II AMOB”: [CH 4 ] > 40 ppm The concentration profiles of AMOB signature PLFAs, as detected by Stable Isotope Probing (SIP) completely corroborates with the Potential Methane Oxidation (PMO) values at all study sites The highest PMO values in the Permanently Flooded site can be entirely attributed to the AMOB, as reflected by the relative abundance of the signature PLFAs Type I AMOB are dominant under the oxygen rich conditions in contrast to the Type II that are abundant under submerged conditions The three hydrologically distinct landscape positions each present characteristic microbial community structure, as evident in this study ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Dr. W.J. Mitsch, Director, Wilma H. Schiermeier Olentangy River Wetland Research Park, OSU, Columbus, OH, U.S.A. Dr. Andrea Grottoli, Biogeochemistry Lab, School of Earth Sciences, OSU DR. Kary Green-Church, Director, Campus Chemical Instrument Center, Mass Spectrometry & Proteomics Facility, OSU Fig. 6. Compound-specific carbon isotope values of PLFAs incorporating 13 C following incubation of Winter soil samples under Yppmv 13 CH 4 : A: 0-8cm, PF Site, 2ppmv B: 0-8cm, IF Site, 2ppmv C: 0-8cm, PF Site, 60ppmv D: 0-8cm, IFSite, 60ppmv SUMMARY: AMOB PLFA Conc. & PMO RESULTS: 13 C-Phospholipid Fatty Acids X X X X X X X N X X X X Fig. 3 Experimental Wetland 1 Upland (UP) Permanently Flooded (PF) Soil Sampling Points Intermittently Flooded (IF) Outflows EXPERIMENTAL SITE METHODS REFERENCES CONCLUSIONS Fig. 7. Mean AMOB PLFA concentration (nmolgdwt. -1 soil) and PMO at different Landscape positions in Winter and Summer 18:1ω9c 16:1ω5c 18:1ω7c PMO Color Legend 0 50 100 150 200 Winter Data PF-8-16 cm PF-0-8 cm IF-8-16 cm IF-0-8 cm UP-8-16 cm UP-0-8 cm 0 20 40 60 80 200 PF-8-16 cm PF-0-8 cm IF-8-16 cm IF-0-8 cm UP-8-16 cm UP-0-8 cm Experimental Wetland 2 Inflows Nature Precedings : doi:10.1038/npre.2011.6291.1 : Posted 26 Aug 2011
Transcript
  • Template provided by: “posters4researc

    Type II Aerobic Methane Oxidizing Bacteria (AMOB) Drive Methane Oxidation in Pulsed Wetlands as Indicated by 13C-Phospholipid

    Fatty Acid CompositionTaniya Roy Chowdhury*a and Richard P. Dicka

    aSchool of Environment & Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, U.S.A.

    THE OLENTANGY RIVER “Kidney” WETLANDS, Ohio, U.S.A.Soil Sampling Locations (Fig. 3) and Factors:

    Factor Number NameLandscape 2 ORW1,ORW2Hydrology 3 Permanently Flooded (PF)

    Intermittently Flooded (IF)Upland (UP)

    Flow zones 2 Inflow (I), Outflow (O)

    Soil Depth 2 0-8 cm816 cm

    Season 4 Fall, Winter, Spring, Summer

    Soils Incubated under two different concentrations of 13CH4 : 2ppmv and 60ppmv

    RESULTS: Potential Methane Oxidation

    The magnitude of climate change predicted for the United States over the next 100 years will cause significant impacts on temperature and precipitation patterns

    Wetlands are a major source (~25 %) of methane globally1

    Aerobic Methane Oxidizing Bacteria (AMOB) have the unique ability to utilize CH4 as the sole source of carbon and energy by the Methane Mono Oxygenase (MMO) mediated reaction

    A variety of environmental determinants have been implicated in the dominance of AMOB type. Generally, type I AMOB outcompete type II AMOB in low CH4 (~2ppmv), high oxygen environments, while type II AMOB are favored in high CH4 (≥40ppmv) environments2

    AMOB are active at the oxic sediment - water interface (“pulsing fringe”, Fig. 2)

    AMOB consume ~30 Tg-CH4-yr-1, and potentially can offset CH4losses to the atmosphere1

    Very little is known about the effects of pulsing hydrology and season on the AMOB ecology

    Therefore, the Objectives of this Study were:

    Experiment 1:Determine the effects of Season and Landscape position on Potential Methane Oxidation (PMO) in the two wetlands

    Experiment 2:Determine the effects of Season and Landscape position on the Aerobic Methane Oxidizing Bacteria (AMOB) as reflected by their biomarker Phospholipid Fatty Acid (PLFA) Compositions

    INTRODUCTION

    WETLAND HYDROLOGY EXPERIMENT

    1. Whalen, S.C. (2005). Environ. Eng. Sc. 22(1):73-922. Hanson, R.S., and Hanson, T.E. (1996). Methanotrophic bacteria.

    Microbiol. Rev. 60:439–4713. Jahnke, L. L., R. E. Summons, J. M. Hope, and Des Marais, D.J.

    (1999). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 63:79-934. Altor, A. E. and Mitsch, W.J.. (2006). Ecological Engineering 28:

    224-234.5. Crossman, Z.M., Abraham, F., Evershed, R.P. (2004). Environ.Sc. &

    Tech. 38: 359–13676. Maxfield, P. J., E. R. C. Hornibrook and Evershed, R.P. (2006). Appl.

    Environ. Microbiol. 72: 3901-3907

    Effect of Pulsing on Methane Emission in the Olentangy River Wetlands4 (Altor and Mitsch, 2006)

    E

    Exposed Average

    Inundated Average

    Aver

    age

    Met

    hane

    Flu

    x (m

    g C

    H4-

    cm-2

    h-1

    )

    5

    1

    Intermittently Flooded(IF) with emergent

    macrophytes

    Intermittently Flooded (IF)

    without emergent

    macrophytes

    PermanentlyFlooded (PF)

    10

    • Effect of pulsing onMethane emission in the two 1-ha experimental Olentangy River Wetlands

    • Methane fluxes in IF zones of the wetlandswere 30% of those in the PF wetland areas (Fig. 1)

    Zone of Anaerobic Methanogenesis

    Oxic Sediment-Water-Interface: the “Pulsing” fringeO2O2

    Wetland – “Kidney” of the Ecosytems

    Methane

    Fig. 2. Illustration of the Oxygen rich “pulsing fringe” in a Wetland

    O2

    Fig.1

    Figs. 4 & 5:Seasonal average PMO across landscape positions: PMO in Winter significantly higher than in Summer (p< 0.01)PMO statistically higher at 0-8 cm depth of soil in the PF and

    IF sites (p< 0.05)

    • Soil samples injected with known concentration of 99.99% pure CH4 gas

    • PMO reported innmol-CH4.gdwt.-1Soil.h-1

    Measure linear

    decrease in CH4

    concentrationover time (7h) using GC-FID

    CH4CO2

    SoilSlurry

    Std. CH4

    Method 1: Potential Methane Oxidation (PMO), Crossman et al. (2004)

    99.99%

    13CH4Air

    Mixing Chamber13C

    H413CH4

    PLFA Analysis by GC-c-IRMS

    Method 2: 13CH4 Incubation Pulse-Chase Experimental Setup: Stable Isotope Probing of PLFA using GC-c-IRMS, Maxfield et al., 2006

    Fingerprint AMOB PLFAs:Type I AMOB: 16:1ω5c, 16:1ω7cType II AMOB:18:1ω7c, 18:1ω9c

    18:1ω8c

    Soils Incubated under two different concentrations of 13CH4 : 2ppmv and 60ppmv

    i. “Type I AMOB”: [CH4 ] 40 ppm

    The concentration profiles of AMOB signature PLFAs, as detected by Stable Isotope Probing (SIP) completely corroborates with the Potential Methane Oxidation (PMO) values at all study sites

    The highest PMO values in the Permanently Flooded site can be entirely attributed to the AMOB, as reflected by the relative abundance of the signature PLFAs

    Type I AMOB are dominant under the oxygen rich conditions in contrast to the Type II that are abundant under submerged conditions

    The three hydrologically distinct landscape positions each present characteristic microbial community structure, as evident in this study

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    Dr. W.J. Mitsch, Director, Wilma H. Schiermeier Olentangy River Wetland Research Park, OSU, Columbus, OH, U.S.A.Dr. Andrea Grottoli, Biogeochemistry Lab, School of Earth Sciences,

    OSUDR. Kary Green-Church, Director, Campus Chemical Instrument

    Center, Mass Spectrometry & Proteomics Facility, OSU

    Fig. 6. Compound-specific carbon isotope values of PLFAs incorporating 13C following incubation of Winter soil samples under Yppmv 13CH4 :

    A: 0-8cm, PF Site, 2ppmv B: 0-8cm, IF Site, 2ppmv

    C: 0-8cm, PF Site, 60ppmv D: 0-8cm, IFSite, 60ppmv

    SUMMARY: AMOB PLFA Conc. & PMO

    RESULTS: 13C-Phospholipid Fatty Acids

    X

    X

    X

    X

    X

    X X

    N

    X

    XX

    X

    Fig. 3

    Experimental Wetland 1

    Upland (UP)

    Permanently Flooded (PF)

    Soil Sampling Points

    IntermittentlyFlooded (IF)

    Outflows

    EXPERIMENTAL SITE

    METHODS

    REFERENCES

    CONCLUSIONS

    Fig. 7. Mean AMOB PLFA concentration (nmolgdwt.-1soil) and PMO at different Landscape positions in Winter and Summer

    18:1ω9c 16:1ω5c

    18:1ω7c PMO

    Color Legend

    UP-(0-8)cm

    Winter

    0 50 100 150 200

    ORW1-I-UP 0-8ORW1-I-UP 9-16

    ORW1-I-IF 0-8ORW1-I-IF 9-16ORW1-I-PF 0-8

    ORW1-I-PF 9-16

    Winter Data

    PF-8-16 cm

    PF-0-8 cm

    IF-8-16 cm

    IF-0-8 cm

    UP-8-16 cm

    UP-0-8 cm

    Summer Data

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    ORW1-I-UP 0-8

    ORW1-I-UP 9-16

    ORW1-I-IF 0-8

    ORW1-I-IF 9-16

    ORW1-I-PF 0-8

    ORW1-I-PF 9-16Summer Data

    PF-8-16 cmPF-0-8 cmIF-8-16 cmIF-0-8 cmUP-8-16 cmUP-0-8 cm

    0 20 40 60 80 200

    PF-8-16 cm

    PF-0-8 cm

    IF-8-16 cm

    IF-0-8 cm

    UP-8-16 cm

    UP-0-8 cm

    Experimental Wetland 2

    Inflows

    Nat

    ure

    Pre

    cedi

    ngs

    : doi

    :10.

    1038

    /npr

    e.20

    11.6

    291.

    1 : P

    oste

    d 26

    Aug

    201

    1

    Slide Number 1


Recommended