RECE!VED
VV F 1 /3
Production CompanJ ‘ww.swncomYI ...
• / U.
April 18, 2016
The Honorable George Bedwick, ChairmanIndependent Regulatory Review Commission333 Market Street, 14th FloorHarrisburg, PA 17101
Re: Final Rulemaking: Environmental Protection Performance Standards at Oil and Gas Well Sites (25 Pa.Code Chapters 78 and 78a) - IRRC #3042
Dear Chairman Bedw-ick:
SWN Production Company, LLC (“SWNPC”), an oil and gas exploration and production subsidiary of
Southwestern Energy Company (“SWN”) active in Pennsylvania, appreciates the opportunity to comment on theProposed Amendments to 25 Pa. Code Chapters 78 and 78a, “Environmental Protection Performance Standards
at Oil and Gas Well Sites’1 (collectively, the “New Regutions”) put forth by the Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Protection (“PADEP”),
As the third largest producer of natural gas in the US. Lower 48 and a widely-acknowledged leader inresponsible energy development, SWN and all its subsidiaries haie a deep commitment to providing the energythat powers our nation and our world in an environmentally sensitive and responsible manner. We at SWNPCunderstand that our continued success depends upon our dedication not only to the company and its bottomline, but to the environment and the communities in which we operate. To this end, SWNPC supportsresponsible environmental oil and gas regulation that affords adequate protection to Pennsylvania’s vast natural
resources, and commends the PADEP for seeking to improve the state’s oil and gas regulatory regime, includingwithout (imitation with respect to the protection of water resources, public health, consideration of landownerconcerns and process transparency.
However, while we fully endorse the PADEP’s goals in promulgating the New Regulations, there are certainprovisions therein which could have a dramatic negative impact on our ability to operate without anycorresponding public benefit, could potentially result in unintended adverse consequences, or which are
counterproductive or otherwise problematic from an operational perspective. Thus, starting on the following
page is a short discussion of some of these problematic provisions. Please note that our comments pertain to
potential impacts on SWNPC’s operations arid are offered solely in the spirit of improving the Rule from anoperational perspective, and that they are not meant to be an exhaustive critique or indicate that comments
submitted by other operators or industry groups are without merit. Specifically, SWN is a member of the
Marcellus Shale Coalition and is in full support of the MSC’s comments as to the New Regulations. Thank you in
advance for your review and consideration of the comments provided herein.
A’
i1: P)k iXfl5 ti)
000C) t’, &Mh iw m
TX 7?3—95.1 wI i)rt4it
Page 2
SWNPCComryents on Proposed Amendments to 25 Pa. Code Chapters 78 and 78aApr 18, 2016
Provision:
78a,59c, Centralized Impoundments a) An operator using a centralized impoundment at the time of the
effective date of these regulations shall close the centralized impoundment in accordance with this sectionprobtain a permit in accordance with subpartj Article IX (Relating to Residual Waste Mangment). Theclosure plan shaU be submitted electronically to the Department through its web site review and approval nolater than (six months from the effective date of this regulation.) The operator shall properly close thecentralized impoundment in accordance with the approved plan or obtain a permit in accordance with$ipart D,rticle IX (Relating to Residual Waste Management) no later than ((3) years from the effective dateof this regulation.
SWNPC Comment/Recommendation:
In order to continue to operate efficIently and effectively, SWNPC recommends that the proposed mandate toclose existing impoundments, forcing the construction of centralized tank farms (CTFs) be reconsidered as thiswill have significant cost implications and unintended consequences such as increased truck traffic and increasein surface impaci. Total costs associated with closing our existing four flowback impoundments, two separatefacilities, will range between $3-$5 million dollars. Additionally, the constructiOn of new CTF’s will rangebetween $4.5-$6.5 million dollars, totaling between $8-$13 million dollars for the two (2) facilities in order to
replace the existing impoundments volumes. Furthermore, operating casts would be between .5600-$900
thousand dollars a year, per site. These costs include electronic monitoring, 24 hour on-site support personnel
for truck unloading and tank mixing operations. In total, each CTF location will increase 5WN’s operating cost by$i.2$1.8 million dollars a year.
Increased truck traffic will also have adverse impacts on local road infrastructure and adverse safety implicationsas well. Other unintentional impacts surrounding CTF are the surface footprint and visual impacts to surroundinglandowners, SWN’s replacement CTF’s will be greater than 20 acres in size, exceeding the current 15 acre size forour impoundments. Tank farms will also be highly visible and have greater exposure to strong weather, lighting
strikes, vandalism and otherfactors out of SWNPC’s control.
Timing is also a concern for SWN regarding any mandated CTFfor reuse water. Permit time frames are expected
to take at least a year comparing to traditional timefines, and construction will add an additional six months.
Should pre-coristruction groundwater monitoring be required at each location for a full year this would extendthe total permit time to 18 to 36 months. Lastly, there will be an impact on our ability to utilize our reuse waterand a potentiulfor a loss of 3 million barrels of reuse fluid due to the closing of these impoundments. This will
create an increased operating cost 10 haul and dispose of that water to a tune of approximately $45 million
dollars, and this does not accountfor any production delays.
SWN recommends new construction be based on Centralized Waste Treatment facility design criteria, as outlined
in 40 CER 437.2 (cj. and grandfarhering existing impoundments far 7 years to maximize water reuse and
minimize additional surface construction impacts. Additionally, SWNPC feels PADEP Oil and Gas staff should
manage all reuse water and permitting facilities, with a benefit of streamlined permitting for projects that are
environmentallyfavorable.
Thn Rght Peopie *lrrg the Right Things,
wsa.i nvw5r. the oesh ifow from ourwdni1jrq Aonet oreetn
Page 2SWNPCComments on Proposed Amendments to 25 Pa. Code Chapters 78 and 78aApril 18, 2016
Provision:
78a.65 Relating to Site Restoration and Reclamation: Restoration. The owner or operator shall restore landsurface areas disturbed to construct the well site as follows: 1) Post Drilling — within 9 months aftercompletion of drilling a well, the owner or operator shall undertake post-drilling restoration of the well site inaccordance with a restoration plan developed in accordance with subsection (I,) and remove all drillingsupplies, equipment, primary containment and secondary containment not necessary for production orneeded to safely operate the well... (I) ...on a multi-well pad, restoration is required within 9 months afteicompletion of drilling all permitted wells on the well site or 9 months after the expiration of all existing wellpermits on the well site, whichever is later.
SWNPC Comment/Recommendation:
These requirements relating to site restoration and reclamation should be stricken for unconventional wells, asthey pertain more closely to conventional wells. SWNPC believes our locations are constructed to a reasonablesize to ensure safe operations for our producing wells for their life span. SWNPC believes as long as pastconstruction storm water management controls are designed, approved, and constructed to manage rates andvolumes, and the site is permanently stabilized, then minimizing the site is not warranted for theseunconventional well locations and a potential safety concern.
Additionally, typical development timelines for unconventional reservoirs require multiple trips to a pad site,which may span up to a decade of development. Therefore, SWNPC would be required, if held to proposedregulations, to engage in contracting of locations and subsequent expanding of the same locations to supportdevelopment activities, This increased earth disturbance on previously stabilized land surfaces and the increasedroad and construction related traffic will leading to deterioration of local infrastructure, increased road relatedtraffic will also increase the potent,al for other environmental impacts, such as fugitive dust, as well asdecreasing community relations for landowners in our operating areas. If 78o. 65 is approved as proposed.SWNPC would be required to invest upwards of $70 million dollars in contraction and expansion activities forearth disturbance alone.
We thank IRRC for their consideration of our comments to the proposed New Regulations. If you would like todiscuss further, please contact me at 832796••282O and I will make the appropriate staif available.
Sincerely.
,,4 V
The sInt &r rhe jr’t he5D.
waI hvn tie cath tw rrp- trjrq Ai-,eete. ,,i itT
John E. Bergeron, Jr.Senior Vice President Appalachia
Dev
elop
men
tS
olut
ions
Bal
anci
ng
Env
iron
men
t,O
om
rnu
nit
&E
cono
rnU
adi
visi
onof
Sou
thw
este
rnE
nerg
y
PA
DE
PR
ule
78A
Eff
ect
toSW
NO
pera
tion
s
A
-
.
I10c;: CDCDCI)
7JCo
(I) .1Cr-,
3))J.
%—
cii-’
C/)ciiQ)CDCODC)J.CD
DCDD3
(DD
%_.1
+
agem
ent
-C
ost
Impa
ct
__
Cap
ital
Cos
tC
ost
per
site
Num
ber
ofT
otal
Cos
t($
M)
Des
crip
tion
($M
)F
acil
itie
s
Clo
seEx
istin
g1.
5—
2.0
23
-5
Impo
undm
ents
Con
stru
ctne
w4.
5—6.
52
8-1
3C
entr
aliz
edTa
nkFa
cilit
y(C
TF)
Tot
alC
apita
l11
-18
Cos
t Dis
cuss
ion:
Incr
emen
tal
Ope
rati
ngC
ost
-$6
00-
$900
Kpe
ryea
r/
site
.C
ost
incl
udes
elec
tron
icS
CA
DA
mon
itor
ing,
24ho
uron
site
supp
ort
for
truc
kun
load
ing
and
tank
mix
ing
oper
atio
ns.
•N
um
ber
ofs
ites
=2
•T
otal
year
lyop
erat
ing
cost
-$1
.2-
$1.8
M/y
ear
A2
ua1
Impa
ct
Sur
face
Impa
ct—
33%
larg
erfo
otpr
int
•Im
poun
dmen
t—15
acre
s•
CT
F-+
20ac
res
—To
min
imiz
eop
erat
iona
lde
lays
,w
illco
nstr
uct
new
CTF
son
new
land
duri
ngph
ase
out
peri
odfr
omim
poun
dmen
ts.
Vis
ual
Imp
act
Com
par
ison
(see
dra
win
g)
—T
ank
Farm
prof
ile
wit
hfe
ncin
g—
Impo
undm
ent —
hill
side
wit
hfe
ncin
g
‘4,
3
Cap
ital
Cost
Co
stper
Wel
lA
nnua
lC
ost
bas
edO
ptio
n2(A
ssu
mes
incr
ease
due
to($
)on
90w
ell
count
only
SW
tru
cked
—
tru
ckin
g($
M)
250
tru
cks/
wel
l)
1,40
0tr
uckl
oads
per
$560
,000
$50.
4$1
00K
per
wel
lan
dw
ell
toha
ulal
lwat
er$9
Mpe
rye
arba
sed
on90
wel
lco
unt
Incr
ease
in$4
50,0
00$4
5C
ompl
etio
ntim
edu
eto
wat
erm
ovem
ent
—3—
6day
s
Tot
alC
apit
alC
ost
$1,0
10,0
00/w
ell
$95.
4M/y
ear
$54M
/yea
rIn
crea
se
Dis
cuss
ion:
•P
art
68B
—st
ates
that
unde
rgro
und
pipi
ngw
illno
tbe
allo
wed
tom
ove
reuse
wat
er,
thus
all
re-u
sew
illre
quir
etr
ucki
ng•
Tab
leas
sum
es10
0%of
all
wat
erm
oved
bytr
uck
and
exis
ting
pipe
line
Ifal
low
edto
pipe
fres
hwat
er,
tru
cklo
ads
will
infr
astr
uctu
reis
shut
-in.
dec
reas
e(S
eeO
ptio
n2)
L?L
.i
‘4
.1
4
CD
L)D4J
a —
C)“a)
CDcuI1%)
• —
E0
C)1%)
ci)
C)v*)
0U
C)-c3
C)
D
in• —
Iw
II-’
CD=
in
C CD L..
ECCD
‘Iv,- CDC v-,CD
•1-’0
a)C
V.,0
CDCDCD
I’C4- CDCa)-
CD a);>F”
(I)4J
-D CCDC cl_c L.
CD4— V.,Cu
.—
cl0
CD
-(I) O’i— r a)a) _J
>a) bOa)U
CU CD CDIf)
V.,-5C clbDa)CD -czDa)
C V) ) > 4_)CD va) CC
b.O(I V) —
CD CD —
c) •— CDC C%p
bO•
-m
I I I
4
“3UFU
C)z
LC)
c.a
I
..ati
on
s
Oth
erC
onsi
dera
tion
s/C
once
rns
—P
ossi
ble
oper
atio
nal
dela
ysdu
eto
perm
itti
ngof
CTF
s•
Tim
ing
Com
pone
nts:
—P
ossi
ble
requir
emen
tto
mon
itor
GW
1ye
arbe
fore
cons
truc
tion
—P
erm
it—
lyea
r—
Con
stru
ctio
n6
mon
ths
•T
otal
Per
mit
Tim
e—
18—
36m
onth
s(d
epen
den
tup
onti
min
gbet
wee
n1
&2
abov
e)—
Eff
ect
onR
e-us
eif
tim
ing
gap
bet
wee
nim
poundm
ent
shut
-in
and
CTF
cons
truc
tion
•L
oss
of3,
000,
000
barr
els
ofre
-use
flui
din
clos
ing
ofim
poun
dmen
ts—
Res
ulti
ngin
15%
incr
ease
inFW
nee
ded
•In
crea
sein
Ope
rati
ngco
stto
haul
-off
and
disp
ose
ofre
-use
-$4
5M
—P
rodu
ctio
nde
lays
due
toco
mpl
etio
nti
min
gin
crea
se(‘
540
tota
lda
ysof
prod
ucti
onde
lay)
—In
crea
seC
apit
alco
stan
dcu
rren
tlo
wga
spr
ices
—ef
fect
capi
tal
depl
oym
ent
econ
omic
s
A’
6
nen
tO
ptio
ns-
IL
All
owfo
rco
nst
ruct
ion
ofne
wim
poundm
ents
bas
edon
consi
sten
ten
gin
eeri
ng
req
uir
emen
ts—
Req
uire
new
cons
truc
tion
bede
sign
edba
sed
onC
entr
aliz
edW
aste
Tre
atm
ent
faci
litie
s(C
WT
)cr
iteri
aas
outli
ned
in40
CFR
437.
2(c)
—B
enef
itsin
clud
ere
duce
dsu
rfac
eim
pact
and
visu
alim
pair
men
t
•G
ran
dfa
ther
exis
ting
impoundm
ents
for
7yea
rs—
Ben
efits
incl
ude
min
imiz
ing
addi
tiona
lsu
rfac
eco
nstr
ucti
onim
pact
sM
axim
ize
wat
erre
use
•G
ran
dfa
ther
exis
ting/p
erm
itte
dw
ater
mo
vem
ent
pipe
line
syst
ems
—R
equi
rean
nual
pre
ssure
test
com
plia
nce
ofM
AO
Pfo
rPL
—B
enef
its
incl
ude
min
imiz
ing
truc
king
com
plex
ity,
and
road
and
brid
gere
pair
s
•S
impl
ify
PA
Sta
tepe
rmit
ting
for
reuse
wat
erm
anag
emen
t—
Allo
wD
EP
Oil
and
Gas
tom
anag
eal
lre
use
wat
eran
dpe
rmitt
ing
faci
liti
es
—S
trea
mli
nepe
rmit
ting
for
proj
ects
that
are
envi
ronm
enta
lly
favo
rabl
e(r
euse
oppo
rtun
itie
sfr
omot
her
oper
ator
s)I
‘.47
J2..
÷_A
‘48
j2
_A
‘4
I
9
Impa
cts
•S
ecti
on65
aR
equi
res
Pos
tD
rillin
gR
esto
rati
on:
—W
ithin
9m
onth
sof
drill
ing
or—
With
in9
mon
ths
from
expi
rati
onof
drill
perm
it
•Is
sues
/Con
cern
s—
Reg
ulat
ion
man
dat
esad
diti
onal
eart
hdi
stur
banc
ein
conf
lictw
ithty
pica
lun
conv
enti
onal
deve
lopm
ent
tim
elin
es—
Unn
eces
sary
inve
stm
ent
ifP
CS
Mis
adeq
uat
efo
rpa
das
orig
inal
lyco
nstr
ucte
dan
dst
abel
ized
—P
adre
duct
ion
crea
tes
anun
safe
wor
kar
eaif
need
edfo
rw
ell
cont
rol
—In
crea
ses
road
traf
fic,
acce
lera
ted
road
dete
rior
atio
n,du
stpo
tent
ial
AV
[
10
nE
xam
ple
.4
Dat
eO
per
atio
n$
2010
Dri
lled
initi
alac
reag
eho
ldin
gw
ells
Jul
TD
’d2”
’wel
l
2011
Feb
Con
trac
tpa
d$1
00,0
00
Apr
Inte
rim
Res
tora
tion
Dea
dlin
e
2013
Exp
and
pad
for
upco
min
gdr
illin
g$
80,0
00
2014
Mar
TD
’d6t
hw
ell
Sep
Con
trac
tP
ad$1
00,0
00
Dec
Inte
rim
Res
tora
tion
Dea
dlin
e
2017
Exp
and
pad
for
upco
min
gdr
illin
g$
80,0
00
May
TD
10tl
weI
l
Nov
Con
trac
tP
adfo
rre
mai
nder
ofpr
oduc
tion
$100
,000
2018
Jan
Inte
rim
Res
tora
tion
Dea
dlin
e
Tot
alIn
teri
mE
arth
Dis
turb
ance
toD
evel
op$4
60,0
00
cU
nit
Out
line
s
Wel
lP
ad
Acr
eage
Hol
ding
Wel
ls
1st
Ret
urn
Dril
ling
Tri
p
Fina
lR
etur
nD
rillin
gT
rip
pz_.
A11
...N)
+
IIU)
zQ)c:-a
i3C)
cD—CD0XCI) ;=-I’-‘—
DS?.OCD0CD
Q1.