Date post: | 08-Jul-2015 |
Category: |
Presentations & Public Speaking |
Upload: | jackybourgeois |
View: | 153 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Conversation with my Washing Machine: An in-the-wild Study of Demand Shifting with
Self-generated Energy
Jacky Bourgeois, Janet van der Linden, Gerd Kortuem,
Blaine A. Price and Christopher Rimmer
1
In collaboration with
2
Electricity generation with solar panels alters people’s relationship with energy
“Energy farmers”
Local Energy Generation is Complex
• Self-generated energy is used locally or is exported to grid
• Additional energy is imported from the grid if required
• Import costs are higher than export payments received
• Generation incentive payments vary by country
“optimizing” energy use in the home is complicated
3
Solar Photovoltaic (PV)
Generation
ExportTo the grid
ImportFrom the grid
Self-consumption
Local Energy Generation is Complex
“Energy Gap”: Consumption and local generation are out of sync
• Generation and consumption vary during day
• Generation and consumption vary by weather and season
• Typically generation peaks around midday, consumption peaks in early evening
4
Electricity Profile of household #12 on 7 May 2013 (Consumption vs Generation)
Previous Research
• Most ubicomp and HCI energy research has focused on consumption and demand reduction
• “Double-dividend of solar generation” [Keirstead 2007]: households adopt new energy saving practices
• “Looking out of the window” [Price et al 2013]: householders estimate weather impact to shift demand
5
What role can Ubicomp technology play in enabling or supporting new
energy practices in households with solar generation?
Specifically: demand shifting
6
Case Study: Doing Laundry with Washing Machine
7
Laundry practices and washing machine use is good case study:
• Everyone needs to wash clothes
• Involves whole family
• Temporal constraints (deadlines)
• Environmental impact
• Emerging demand-shifting practices
by Gloria Garcia
“In-the-Wild” Study with Households
Objective
• Understand household practices
• Explore design alternatives for in-home technology
Scope
• 8 Months
• 18 households
• 64 participants
8
Study Methodology
• Home instrumentation
• Participatory energy data analysis
• Design and deployment of technology interventions
• Qualitative studies:
• Home visits
• Interviews & focus groups
• Thematic analysis
9
Study Methodology: Energy Data
• 20M data points over 2 years
• Household electricity generation
• Household electricity import
• Household electricity export
• Washing machine use (timing and electricity consumption)
• Other appliances (timing and electricity consumption)
10
Fixing technology installation presented an opportunity for qualitative data gathering
Four Technology Interventions
12
#1 Delayed Energy Feedback via Email
13
#1 Delayed Energy Feedback via Email
14
• Participants received email with summary energy report few days after they have used the washing machine
• Report outlines:• Predicted solar energy
generation for next 5 days• Past daily generation and
washing machine use
• Idea: enables householders to reflect on behavior and plan future washing machine use
#1 Delayed Energy Feedback via Email: Findings
15
• Users did not engage with energy reports, neither in a positive nor negative way
• Interpretation:
• the gulf between email and real family life is too large
• Planning of washing machine use is not something that is done on the computer
#2 Real-time Feedback via SMS Text Messages
16
#2 Real-time Feedback via SMS Text Messages
• Participants received SMS a few minutes after washing machine use
• 'You ran your washing machine at 15:45 today (3.7% green). You could have achieved 43.6% by starting it at 10:34.‘
• 'Congratulations! You ran your washing machine at 13:48 today (65% green). The expected maximum for today was 71%.'
17
#2 Real-time SMS Feedback: Findings
• “Just saying ‘your washing used 63 percent of solar’, that’s in itself is not really useful to us.”
• “unless you’re going to keep all these text message and analysethem, you are not going to get that information.”
• “It’s like shooting in the dark!”
18
#3 Proactive Suggestions via SMS Text Messages
19
#3 Proactive Suggestions via SMS Text Messages
• Participants received a SMS message at a time they had chosen. This message:
• Suggests best time of day to run washing machine during the next 36 hours
• This involved predicting solar energy generation for each hour of a day and uses past weather and generation data, and local weather forecast
20
#3 Proactive Suggestions: Findings
• Very positive response from participants
• Some participants followed suggestions
• Even if participants did not follow the suggestions they appreciated that the information was there for them
21
#3 Proactive Suggestions: Findings
• Huge diversity across households – where each family wanted to receive their proactive message at a different time
• Many requests for changes to mobile phone numbers for the messages, thus involving more members of the household
22
#4 Embedded Control
23
#4 Embedded Control
• Display and interactive control near the washing machine which was actually controlling the machine and receiving feedback (Zigbee)
• Shows best time to use washing machine
• User can select auto-start at best time
• User can select constraints for start and end time
24
#4 Embedded Control: Findings
• Mostly positive reactions• Actionable information at
right time and right place
• Participants suggested many refinements:• Start time should
continuously adapt to current weather
• The system should pause the washing machine when a cloud passes
25
#4 Embedded Control: Findings
• New laundry practices:
• load machine in the morning, set to auto-start, leave for work
• Appropriation:
• Participants used Information about best start time to manually control other appliance (dish washer)
26
Conclusion
1. Technology support for demand-shifting is viable and effective
• Supporting emerging practices, not behavior change
2. Engagement and utility increased from
• decontextualized information -> embedded contextual control (i.e. email -> washing machine display)
• retroactive feedback -> proactive suggestions
3. Decisions about timing of washing machine use is negotiated through “conversations with my washing machine“
4. Future work: from one appliance to many appliances
27
Conversation with my Washing Machine: An in-the-wild Study of Demand Shifting with
Self-generated Energy
Jacky Bourgeois, Janet van der Linden, Gerd Kortuem,
Blaine A. Price and Christopher Rimmer
In collaboration with