Date post: | 15-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | reagan-thatch |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 3 times |
2
Meeting highlights
• The meeting was attended by over 900 delegates
• 97% thought that the conference was well organised
• 93% thought the length of the meeting was just right
• 92% felt they had learned something from the event
• 70% felt that the event would change their practice
• 99% would attend the next meeting
4
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1% 3%
41%
55%
0%
How would you rate the quality of the content?
UIT 2014 content quality
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
6%
45%49%
0% 0%
How would you rate the quality of the speakers?
Majority of the speakers were
excellent!
Generally very high quality!
Most speakers are first class!
ExcellentVery goodNeutralFairPoor
n=270 n=270
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f re
spo
nd
en
ts (
%)
96% 94%
5
Overall meeting quality
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
1% 1%7%
40%52%
Have you learned something from this event?
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1% 4%
25%
45%
25%
Will this event change your practice?
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1% 0% 1%8%
89%
Was the event well organised?
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
29%
8%16% 14%
33%
Did you feel that the event was biased?
n=272
n=272
n=267
n=257
92% 70%
97%
Pro
port
ion
of r
espo
nden
ts (
%)
Pro
port
ion
of r
espo
nden
ts (
%)
Neutral YesNo
7
Session I: Treatment pathway of the infertile couple
Very good lectures with a dynamic way to perform them
Very well planned program and audience interaction is well organised
Great provocative lecture from Professor Fisk
Remarkable organisation
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
1% 1% 2%
6%3%
5% 6% 6%
18%
6%
20%
15%
19%
39%
24%
46%48%
43%
25%
35%
27%29% 30%
11%
33%
ExcellentVery goodNeutralFairPoor
n=483 n=481 n=484 n=480n=477
73% 77% 73%
36%
68%
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f r
es
po
nd
en
ts (
%)
8
Session II: Variations in treatment protocols
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
2% 2% 2% 3%1%
10%
1%4%
6%
27%
12%
23%
38% 37% 37%
43%
53%
24%
47%
27%
Very good session and speakers
Congratulations to Dr Fatemi
Bhatti was honest about what we DON’T know – which was good
Very useful session
n=445 n=445 n=449 n=433
ExcellentVery goodNeutralFairPoor
91%
61%
84% 70%
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f r
es
po
nd
en
ts (
%)
9
Session III: Advances in embryology
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
3%1% 1% 1%
6%3% 2% 2%
24%22%
20%
16%
42%
47% 48%
42%
25% 26%29%
40%
Excellent up-to-date presentations on comprehensive data
Very good session with up-to-date information
Excellent session – really enjoyed it
n=414 n=408 n=404 n=398
ExcellentVery goodNeutralFairPoor
67%
73% 77%
82%
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f r
es
po
nd
en
ts (
%)
10
Session IV: Genetics in diagnosis and management of pregnancy
Does array CGH improve pregnancy rates? - Carmen
Rubio
PGD for single gene disorders - Svetlana Rechitsky
Transcriptomic assessment of endometrial factor - David Blesa
Keynote lecture 3: Cell-free DNA for non-invasive fetal
genetic diagnosis - Dennis Lo
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2% 2%4% 3%2%
5%
11%
1%
17%
22%
36%
5%
47% 47%
33%
21%
32%
24%
17%
70%
Dennis Lo gave an exceptionally brilliant lecture worthy of a Nobel
Prize candidate
Prof Lo’s lecture has been the highlight of the meeting –
Fantastic!
Excellent lecture from Dennis – he should do the opening lecture
at ESHRE
n=342 n=340 n=332 n=316
ExcellentVery goodNeutralFairPoor
79% 71%
50%
91%
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f r
es
po
nd
en
ts (
%)
11
Session V: Ovarian reserve – individualisation of treatment
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
1% 1% 1% 2%2% 3% 2%4%
20%
13%9%
15%
36%
47% 45%
39%41%
36%
43%40%
Keynote lecture was excellent
Very good session with great speakers – would have liked
more from Bob CasperBest session of the meeting
n=253 n=261 n=263 n=254
ExcellentVery goodNeutralFairPoor
77% 83% 88%
79%
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f r
es
po
nd
en
ts (
%)
12
Session VI: Challenges in infertility treatment…to treat or not to treat?
Couples with viral diseases - Anne Delbaere
Women with cancer - Kirsten Macklon
Women deferring childbearing - Tonko Mardešić
Keynote lecture 5: Donors without errors - do they exist? -
Nick Macklon
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
7% 7%
28%
50%
25%
38%
7%
43%
68%
31%
93%
3%
ExcellentEntertaining talk from
Nick!Really the best
meeting I’ve been in
n=28 n=28 n=29 n=29
ExcellentVery goodNeutralFairPoor
93%
93%
69%
100%
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f r
es
po
nd
en
ts (
%)
14
Meeting materials and interactivity
Rated the abstract book as very good or excellent 84%
Rated the pre-meeting correspondence/ information as very good to excellent
83%
Rated the iPad materials as very good or excellent 95%
Rated the interactivity as very good or excellent 95%
Felt there was sufficient time for discussion94%
n=270
n=271
n=267
n=264
n=270
15
Meeting venue
Rated the auditorium as very good or excellent95%
Rated the location and venue as very good or excellent97%
Rated the catering as very good or excellent94%
n=269
n=271
n=270
16
Selected general comments (1)
Because of excellent food, I have 2 kg more, which is not so good but
I enjoyed every meal
Extremely well organized – have been most impressed and grateful
Different continental buffet at conference dinner was a great idea!
We enjoyed it
More comfortable chairs
The AV was exceptional
Fantastic venue and organisation
Dennis Lo was the highlight of the meeting
17
Selected general comments (2)
Enjoyed the academic content and interaction with colleagues
Congratulations to all involved in organizing and delivering this meeting
I would definitely like to attend the next meeting
Please have the next meeting in a warm country!
Congratulations on the great event
Excellent meeting
18
Selected general comments (3)
Too much use of survey feature
No need for abstract book in the era of iPad
Would like to see more use of the iPad to see what the audience does, not
just test the audiences’ understanding
iPad voting is tedious
I missed refreshments for vegans, but otherwise
excellent Poor location of hotel in a business area, Prague is a good choice though. I understand that few places available
to host 1000 people thoughPosition of cameramen disturbed a lot to see the lectures
19
Selected general comments (4)
The dinner was very badly organised, the place was inappropriate, the tables
and chairs – not for our age
The days are packed and intense: 8:30am start unnecessary! 9am plenty
early enoughLong days
The only sad thing was that there was no ‘nurse’ option in the drop down box in profile. Nurses in the UK are pivotal to the running of an IVF unit
Some people were conducting loud conversations, which was a bit distracting – chairs should be
instructed to advise
Auditorium was sometimes too cold but good views all round