+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Ultra power plant

Ultra power plant

Date post: 04-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: bratishkaity
View: 219 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 19

Transcript
  • 7/29/2019 Ultra power plant

    1/19

    Presentation

    on UltraMega &

    Super CriticalProjects

    Organized ByFICCI & MOP

    May 2006

  • 7/29/2019 Ultra power plant

    2/19

    ay 006

    Year

    GROWTH OF INSTALLED GENERATING CAPACITY (MW)

    Hydro

    Nuclear

    Thermal *

    Hydro 508 940 1917 4124 6905 11384 14460 18308 20506 26910 29676 32326

    Nuclear 0 0 0 0 640 640 1095 1565 1720 2720 2720 3360

    Thermal * 854 1755 2736 4903 9059 16424 27030 43417 57244 78343 80860 88601

    Dec-47 Dec-55 Mar-61 Mar-66 Mar-74 Mar-80 Mar-85 Mar-90 Mar-95 Mar-03 Sep-04 Mar-06

    13622695 4653 9027

    16604

    28448

    42585

    63290

    79470

    124287

    * - Includes Wind Capacity

    107973113256

  • 7/29/2019 Ultra power plant

    3/19

    Thermal

    Hydro

    Nuclear

    Renewables

    Installed Capacity

    Thermal82410.54 MW (66%)

    Hydro32325.77 MW (26%)

    Nuclear3360 MW

    Renewables6190 MW

    (Coal 68518)

  • 7/29/2019 Ultra power plant

    4/19

    64.5667.47

    68.7469.97

    72.34 72.9674.82

    73.6

    55

    60

    65

    70

    75

    80

    1998-

    99

    1999-

    00

    2000-

    01

    2001-

    02

    2002-

    03

    2003-

    04

    2004-

    05

    2005-

    06

    PLF%--->

    Plant Load Factor Of Thermal Stations

  • 7/29/2019 Ultra power plant

    5/19

    500 MW Group >84 %250 MW Group >90 %

    Central Sector >82%

    PLF - Some Highlights

  • 7/29/2019 Ultra power plant

    6/19

    Growth In Unit Size/Parameters

    Unit

    Size

    (MW)

    Yr of

    Introduction

    MS Pr

    kg/cm2MS /RH

    Temp (o C)

    < 30 1950 42 455

    100 1970 90 535

    2101977 & 1983 130 &150 535/535

    500 1984 170 538/538

    660 Under Const. 247 535/566

  • 7/29/2019 Ultra power plant

    7/19

    Hydro Thermal Nuclear Total2007-12XI Plan

    18781 40220 3160 68504

    2012-17

    XII Plan 20000 30000 10000 6000 66000

    Figs in MW

    COAL OTHERS

    6343

    Capacity Addition Targets

  • 7/29/2019 Ultra power plant

    8/19

    Drivers For Ultra Mega

    Power Projects LARGE CAPACITY ADDITION PLANNED OVER

    NEXT DECADE IN 11TH PLAN BEYOND

    PACE OF THERMAL CAPACITY ADDITION TO

    INCREASE FROM ~ 5000 MW/Yr TO ~ 10,000 MW/Yr

    ADVANCED PROVEN TECHNOLOGY WITH HIGHEFFICIENCY FOR

    OPTIMAL USE OF RESOURCES HIGHER

    EFFICIENCY

    ECOFRIENDLY POWER GENERATIONECONOMY OF SCALE

    OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY( Faster Start Up, Load

    Cycling)

  • 7/29/2019 Ultra power plant

    9/19

    Concept Of

    Ultra Mega Power Project

    A FEW PRE-IDENTIFIED PROJECTS EACH WITH ACAPACITY OF ABOUT 4000 MW ENVISAGED ABOUT 7NOS. AT PRESENT

    SASAN, MP PIT HEAD

    AKALTARA, CHATTISGARH

    MUNDRA, GUJARAT GIRYE, MAHARASTHRA COASTAL

    TADRI, KARNATAKA

    ORISSAPITHEAD UNDER

    ANDHRA PRADESH - COASTAL CONSIDERATION

    USE OF LARGE UNIT SIZES OF 600 MW & ABOVESUPERCRITICAL TECHNOLOGY

    FIRST FIVE TARGETTED FOR FINALISATION BY 31ST DEC.2006

    PIT HEAD STATIONS WOULD HAVE COAL BLOCKSALLOCATED WITH CAPTIVE MINING

  • 7/29/2019 Ultra power plant

    10/19

    Road Map For Implementation OfUltra Mega Power Projects

    POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFICATION ANDSELECTION BY CEA THROUGH SATELLITEIMAGING, VISITS AND INTEGRATION WITH

    STATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES.

    SEPARATE SPV FOR EACH PROJECT FORPROJECT DEVELOPMENT.

    PFC IDENTIFIED AS NODAL AGENCY FORSETTING UP OF SHELL COMPANIES.

    -------- CONTD.

  • 7/29/2019 Ultra power plant

    11/19

    SHELL COMPANIES TO TAKE FOLLOWINGACTION

    - PREPARATION OF PROJECT REPORT

    - INITIAL LAND ACQUISITION- COAL LINKAGES/COAL BLOCKS ALLOCATIONS FOR

    PIT HEAD PROJECTS

    - ALLOCATION OF WATER

    SHELL COMPANIES TO APPOINT

    CONSULTANTS FOR ICB BID DOCUMENTPREPARATION & EVALUATION.

    SELECTION OF DEVELOPER THROUGH TARIFFBASED ICB.

    SHELL COMPANIES THEN TO BETRANSFERRED TO THE SUCCESSFUL BIDDERFOR PROJECT EXECUTION.

  • 7/29/2019 Ultra power plant

    12/19

    Formation Of Shell Companies

    FIVE SPV (SHELL COMPANIES) FORMED ARE :1. SASAN POWER LIMITED (M.P.)

    2. COASTAL GUJARAT POWER LIMITED (MUNDRA PORT)

    3. COASTAL MAHARASHTRA MEGA POWER LIMITED.

    4. COASTAL KARNATAKA POWER LIMITED.

    5. AKALTARA POWER LIMITED (CHATTISGARH)

    STATE GOVTS. HAVE BEEN REQUESTED BY MOP TOPROVIDE NECESSARY SUPPORT.

    MINISTRY OF COAL HAS AGREED IN-PRINCIPLE TOALLOCATE COAL BLOCKS, FOR PITHEAD STATIONS.

    ADDITIONAL PIT HEAD SITE IN ORISSA AND COASTAL INANDHRA PRADESH BEING EXPLORED.

  • 7/29/2019 Ultra power plant

    13/19

    Current Status Of Ultra Mega

    Projects. FIVE SHELL COMPANIES FORMED.

    EOI ISSUED FOR SADAV, MUNDRA, GIRYE& TADRI.

    TECHNICAL CONSULTANTS APPOINTEDBY SHELL COS. FOR PREPARATION OFPROJECT REPORTS.

    CONSULTANT APPOINTED FOR BID

    DOCUMENTS AND BIDDING PROCESS. POWER ALLOCATION/POWER PURCHASE

    AGREEMENTS ARE BEING FINALISED.

  • 7/29/2019 Ultra power plant

    14/19

    Use Of

    Super Critical Technology Supercritical Technology is widely established and

    accepted with more than 500 units in operation.

    Widely prevalent cycle parameters:

    Pressure: 246 -250 kg/cm2

    Temperature: 538/538 deg C 538/566 deg C (Sipat & Barh TPS)

    566/593 deg C (Mainly in Japan &Germany)

    593/593 or 600/600 deg C

    Preferred steam parameters include higher steamtemp. of 566 to 593 deg C depending upon site specifictechno-economics. BHEL collaboration includes theseparameters.

    Contd.

  • 7/29/2019 Ultra power plant

    15/19

    1. Lara TPS,NTPC 3x800 MW Chattisgarh

    2. Ib ValleyDaripalli,

    NTPC

    2x800 MW Orissa

    3. Barh TPS, NTPC 2x800 MW Bihar4. Krishnapattanam 2x800 MW AP

    5. More Future projects

    Besides Ultra Mega Power Projects Supercritical

    Units envisaged for following projects:-

  • 7/29/2019 Ultra power plant

    16/19

    Expected Efficiency RangeParameters Parameters

    247/535/566@ 247/566/592Tur.

    HR

    Blr

    Eff

    Gross

    HR

    Gross

    Eff

    Tur.

    HR

    Blr

    Eff

    Gross

    HR

    Gross

    Eff

    Case-I Turbine

    Heat Rate =1904

    as Quoted for 660MW & parameters

    at @

    1904

    88% 2164 39.75

    %

    1879

    88% 2135 40.28

    %

    86% 2214 38.84

    %

    86% 2180 39.45

    %

    Case-II Turbine

    Heat Rate =1880

    as per BHEL for660 MW &

    parameters at @

    1880

    88% 2147 40.06

    %

    1855

    88% 2108 40.79

    %

    86% 2197 39.15

    %

    86% 2157 39.87

    %

    Efficiency figures are on HHV basis and 100% load conditions86% boiler efficiency is assumed for Indian coal and 88% for

    Imported coal

  • 7/29/2019 Ultra power plant

    17/19

    List Of Foreign Suppliers ForSupercritical Units

    BOILER STEAM TURBINE

    1.Alstom, France.

    2.MHI, Japan.

    3.IHI, Japan.

    4.Hitachi-Babcock, Japan.

    5.Ansaldo, Italy.

    6.TKZ, Russia.

    7.Doosan, S. Korea.

    8.Foster Wheeler, US.

    9.Babcock & Wilcox, US.

    10.Chinese (SEC, Dengfong,

    Harbin).

    1.Alstom, France.

    2.MHI, Japan.

    3.Siemens, Germany.

    4.Ansaldo, Italy.

    5.Hitachi, Japan.

    6.Toshiba, Japan.

    7.GE, USA.

    8.Doosan, S. Korea.

    9.Chinese (SEC, Dengfong,

    Harbin).

    10.Russian (Power Machines)

  • 7/29/2019 Ultra power plant

    18/19

    Option of using Washed Coal

    Indigenous coal generally have high ash content, widevariation in calorific value, presence of extranousmatter and is unsized.

    Considering large unit size, it is desirable to have goodand consistent coal quality, free of extraneous matterwith a view to

    Narrow down coal design range

    Less wear and tear of coal handling and coalpulverizers

    Reduced teething problems in initial stage oftechnology introduction

    Comfort in plant operation

  • 7/29/2019 Ultra power plant

    19/19

    CONCLUSION

    A MAJOR SHARE OF CAPACITY ADDITION EXPECTEDTHROUGH LARGE SUPERCRITICAL UNITS IN ULTRAMEGA PROJECTS AND OTHER 800 MW SIZE UNITS BYNTPC, APGENCO & OTHER UTILITIES.

    HIGHER STEAM PARAMETERS IN SUPERCRITICAL UNITSPREFERRED FOR BETTER EFFICIENCY.

    FOR OVERALL ECONOMICS, PITHEAD STATIONS CAN BEINTEGRATED WITH COAL WASHING AND CFBC UNIT TOUSE WASHERY REJECTS.

    DESIRABLE TO HAVE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER WITHINDIGENOUS MANUFACTURING CAPACITY BUILDING TOMEET THE PROJECTED CAPACITY ADDITION TARGETSWITH ADEQUATE COMPETITION.


Recommended