Ultrafast dynamics in multiferroics HoMnO3 revealed
by fs spectroscopy
Chih Wei Luo (羅志偉)
Outline
Introduction of femtosecond (fs) laser pulses
Ultrafast dynamics in multiferroics HoMnO3Summary I
High-Tc superconductor YBa2Cu3O7 nanodots
Summary II
What is the ultrashort pulse?
~10-6 s
~10-9 s
~10-12 s~10-15 s
Introduction of fs laser pulses
Timescales
1 minute10 fs light
pulse Age of universe
Time (seconds)
Computer clock cycle
Camera flash
Age of pyramids
One month
Human existence
10-15 10-12 10-9 10-6 10-3 100 103 106 109 1012 1015 1018
1 femtosecond 1 picosecond
a pulse : 1 minute ~ 1 minute : age of universe
Introduction of fs laser pulses
Which one is true?
1 / 1 min
1 / 0.5 min
1 / 1 sec
Idea from 石訓全
Introduction of fs laser pulses
Ultrafast camera!!
Introduction of fs laser pulses
The possibility for nuclear fusion!
Introduction of fs laser pulses
Short pulse = intense peak power100 mJ, 100 fs = 1 TW1018 W/cm2 @ φ = 10 μm (1010 V/cm)
Institute of Laser EngineeringOsaka University
LegendLegend
AmplifierAmplifier
MiraMira
SeedSeed
VerdiVerdiPumpPump
EvolutionEvolutionPumpPump
Short pulse, low energy
Long pulse, high energy
Short pulse, high energy
LegendLegend
AmplifierAmplifier
MiraMira
SeedSeed
VerdiVerdiPumpPump
VerdiVerdiPumpPump
EvolutionEvolutionPumpPump
EvolutionEvolutionEvolutionEvolutionPumpPump
Short pulse, low energy
Long pulse, high energy
Short pulse, high energy
The shorter pulse duration, the more papers!
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 201010-18
10-15
10-12
10-9
intra-cavity pulse compression
XUV excitation pulse
Colliding pulse mode-locking
Passive mode-locking
Active mode-locking
Puls
e du
ratio
n (s
ec.)
Year
First laser (Ruby)
1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 20070
500
1000
1500
2000
Femtosecond in Web of Science
No.
of P
ublic
atio
ns
Year
Prof. Ahmed Zewail
The 1999 Nobel Prize in Chemistry
Prof. Theodor W. Hänsch
The 2005 Nobel Prize in Physics
The evolution of pulse width
Introduction of fs laser pulses
Multiferroic
Ultrafast dynamics in HoMnO3
Ferromagnets (ferroelectrics) form a subset of magnetically (electrically) polarizablematerials such as paramagnets and antiferromagnets (paraelectrics and antiferroelectrics)
W. Eerenstein, N.D. Mathur, J.F. Scott, Nature 442, 759 (2006).
Multiferroic ReMnO3
Ultrafast dynamics in HoMnO3
Hexagonal structure v.s. Orthorhombic structure
Seongsu Lee, et al Nature 451,805 (2008) S. Satpathy, et al PRL 76 ,960 (1996)
W. Prellier, et al, JPCM 17, 803 (2005)
Hexagonal HoMnO3
Ultrafast dynamics in HoMnO3
TC= 875 K Pz= 5.6 μC cm‐2
TN= 76 K TSR= 33 K THo= 5 K
Coexistence between FE and AFM
MnO5 bipyramids form a layered structure on a‐b plane.
B. Lorenz, et al PRB 71 ,014438 (2005)
Magnetoelectric coupling effect on hexagonal HoMnO3
Ultrafast dynamics in HoMnO3
Dielectric constant Heat capacity Lattice constant
B. Lorenz, et al PRL 92 ,087204 (2004)
B. Lorenz, et al PRB 71 ,014438 (2005)
C. Dela Cruz, et al PRB 71 ,060407R (2005)
Optical properties of hexagonal HoMnO3
Ultrafast dynamics in HoMnO3
Transmittance and reflectance measurements were performed using a Fourier transform spectrometer in a frequency range from 10 to 45000 cm-1 (1.2 meV to 5.6 eV)
1.7 eV absorption peak comes from d→d transitions.
~0.15 eV blueshift as decreasing temperature.
Associate with the magnetic phase transition.
A. B. Souchkov, et al PRL 91 ,027203 (2003)
e1g
e2g
a1g
Optical properties of hexagonal HoMnO3
Ultrafast dynamics in HoMnO3
Woo Seok Choi, et al PRB 78 ,054440 (2008)
TN
Rare‐earth : Gd、Tb、Dy、Ho
Crystal structure and magnetic property
Ultrafast dynamics in HoMnO3
Out of plane : c‐axisIn plane : ab‐axis
10 20 30 40 50 60
HM
O(0
06)
HM
O(0
04)
Inte
nsity
(arb
. uni
ts)
2θ (degree)
HM
O(0
02)
TN= 76 K TSR= 33 K THo= 5 K
0 20 40 60 80 100
2.0x10-6
4.0x10-6
6.0x10-6
8.0x10-6
1.0x10-5
1.2x10-5
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
1/χ
(Oe/
emu)
Temperature (K)
Curie-Weiss Law
TSRχ
(em
u/O
e)
Temperature (K)
ZFC 100 OeH//c-axis
THo
Pump-probe and optical spectroscopy
Ultrafast dynamics in HoMnO3
700 720 740 760 780 800 820 840 860 880
Nor
mal
ize
Inte
ntsi
ty (a
rb. u
nits
)
Wavelength (nm)
740nm 755nm 770nm 785nm 800nm 815nm
Tunable photon energy from 1.52 to 1.69 eV
Temperature-dependent transient reflectivity change (ΔR/R)
Ultrafast dynamics in HoMnO3
0 20 40 60 80
T=60K
T=67K
T=71K
T=80K
T=100K
T=140K
T=180K
T=220K
T=290K
Δ
R/R
(arb
. uni
ts)
Delay Time (ps)
0 20 40 60 80
T=210K
T=170K
T=150K
T=140K
T=120K
T=100K
T=60K
T=250K
x3
ΔR
/R (a
rb. u
nits
)
Delay Time (ps)
x3
T=290K
0 20 40 60 80
T=250K
T=210K
T=190K
T=170K
T=130K
T=110K
T=95K
T=85K
ΔR
/R (a
rb. u
nits
)
Delay Time (ps)
T=290K
Wavelength : 800 nm Wavelength : 770 nm Wavelength : 740 nm
Oscillation component
Ultrafast dynamics in HoMnO3
0 10 20 30 40 50
800nm 740nm
ΔR
/R (a
rb. u
nits
)
Delay time (ps)
T=290K
Strain Pulse Model )sin2/( 22 θυλτ −≅ nsoundprobeosc
D. Lim, et al APL 83 ,4800 (2003)
LuMnO3
Ultrafast dynamics in HoMnO3Charge transfer from e2g to a1g by pump pulses
223 rzd
−
levels3Mn3 d+
)(),( 22 xyyxd
−
E
Pump energy :1.52 eVP
ump energy
Pum
p energy
T=290K
T=140K
Room temperature Low temperature
Woo Seok Choi, et al PRB 78 ,054440 (2008)Observed the blueshift of energy gap !
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Nor
mal
ized
am
plitu
de o
f ΔR
/R
Temperature (K)
815nm
T0=140 K
Ultrafast dynamics in HoMnO3Charge transfer from e2g to a1g by pump pulses
Observed the blueshift of energy gap !
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Nor
mal
ized
am
plitu
de o
f ΔR
/R
Temperature (K)
815nm 800nm
levels3Mn3 d+ Pump energy :1.55 eVRoom temperature Low temperature
223 rzd
−
)(),( 22 xyyxd
−
E
Pum
p energy
Pum
p energy
T=290K
T=140K
Ultrafast dynamics in HoMnO3Charge transfer from e2g to a1g by pump pulses
Observed the blueshift of energy gap !
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Nor
mal
ized
am
plitu
de o
f ΔR
/R
Temperature (K)
815nm 800nm
T0=117 K
levels3Mn3 d+ Pump energy :1.55 eVRoom temperature Low temperature
223 rzd
−
)(),( 22 xyyxd
−
E
Pum
p energy
Pum
p energy
T=290K
T=117K
T=140K
Ultrafast dynamics in HoMnO3Charge transfer from e2g to a1g by pump pulses
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Nor
mal
ized
am
plitu
de o
f ΔR
/R
Temperature (K)
815nm 800nm 785nm 770nm 755nm 740nmT0
levels3Mn3 d+ Pump energy :1.68 eVRoom temperature Low temperature
T=63K
Pum
p energy
223 rzd
−
EP
ump energy
T=290K
)(),( 22 xyyxd
−
40 60 80 100 120 140 160 1800.00
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
0.20
Temperature (K)
Slop
e
40 60 80 100 120 140 160 1801.481.501.521.541.561.581.601.621.641.661.681.701.72
Temperature (K)
AFM
Ener
gy g
ap E
dd (e
V)
0 20 40 60 80 100
2.0x10-6
4.0x10-6
6.0x10-6
8.0x10-6
1.0x10-5
1.2x10-5
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
1/χ
(Oe/
emu)
Temperature (K)
Curie-Weiss Law
TSR
χ (e
mu/
Oe)
Temperature (K)
ZFC 100 OeH//c-axis
THo
Ultrafast dynamics in HoMnO3Charge transfer from e2g to a1g by pump pulses
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Nor
mal
ized
am
plitu
de o
f ΔR
/R
Temperature (K)
815nm 800nm 785nm 770nm 755nm 740nmT0
levels3Mn3 d+ Pump energy :1.68 eVRoom temperature Low temperature
40 60 80 100 120 140 160 1800.00
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
0.20
Temperature (K)
Slop
e
40 60 80 100 120 140 160 1801.481.501.521.541.561.581.601.621.641.661.681.701.72
Temperature (K)
AFM
Ener
gy g
ap E
dd (e
V)
T=63K
Pum
p energy
223 rzd
−
EP
ump energy
T=290K
)(),( 22 xyyxd
−T=63K
Pum
p energy
)(),( 22 xyyxd
−
Extra‐blueshift comes from long‐range AFM ordering!!
Ultrafast dynamics in HoMnO3Demagnetization dynamics
0 20 40 60 80
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
75K
180K
290K
ΔR
/R (a
rb. u
nits
)
Delay time (ps)
Te Tl Tsτm
T=75K
T=180K
Delay time (ps)
T=290K
τmτc75 K
60 90 120 150 180 210 240
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
τ m
Temperature (K)
800nm 785nm 770nm 755nm 740nm
Summary
The oscillation due to the strain pulse was clearly observed in ΔR/R by fs spectroscopy.
A distinct blueshift of the Mn3+ d-d optical transition comes from the appearance of AFM long-range ordering.
The demagnetization time (τm) in a few psscale and its recovering time (τc) in a few 100 ps scale were shown in the ΔR/R.
0 10 20 30 40 50
800nm 740nm
ΔR
/R (a
rb. u
nits
)
Delay time (ps)
T=290K
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Nor
mal
ized
am
plitu
de o
f ΔR
/R
Temperature (K)
815nm 800nm 785nm 770nm 755nm 740nmT0
0 20 40 60 80
Te Tl Tsτm
T=75K
T=180K
Delay time (ps)
T=290K
τm 75 K
YBCO nanodotsSample reparation:
Vacuum Pumps
VacuumGauges
Excimer Laser
Lens
YP
Heater
Vacuum ChamberO2
(001) YBa2Cu3O7 (YBCO) / (100) LaAlO3
10 20 30 40 50 60 700
100
200
300
400
YBC
O(0
03)
YBC
O(0
06)
YBC
O(0
07)
LAO
(200
)
YBC
O(0
05)
YBC
O(0
04)
LAO
(100
)
YBC
O(0
02)
YBC
O(0
01)
inte
nsity
(a. u
.)
2θ (degrees)
XRD
SEM
50 100 150 200 2500
5
10
15
Res
ista
nce
(Ω)
Temperature (K)
Tc = 90.1 K
YBCO nanodotsExperimental setup: (spot size~110 μm)
fs Laser
光路徑光路徑
LaAlO3
YBCO19.6 cm
YBCO nanodotsResults – surface morphology
Fluence = 0 J/cm2
Fluence = 0.21 J/cm2
Fluence = 0.26 J/cm2 Fluence = 0.53 J/cm2
Fluence = 0.32 J/cm2
C. W. Luo, C. C. Lee, et al., Optics Express 16, 20610 (2008)
YBCO nanodotsResults – structure
Fluence = 0 J/cm2 Fluence = 0.21 J/cm2
Fluence = 0.26 J/cm2 Fluence = 0.32 J/cm2
Fluence = 0.53 J/cm2
XRD signals of YBCO thin films at various laser fluences.
YBCO nanodotsResults – superconductivity
Fluence = 0 J/cm2 Fluence = 0.21 J/cm2
Fluence = 0.26 J/cm2 Fluence = 0.32 J/cm2
Fluence = 0.53 J/cm2
YBCO nanodotsResults – composition
Fluence = 0 J/cm2 Fluence = 0.21 J/cm2
Fluence = 0.26 J/cm2 Fluence = 0.32 J/cm2
Fluence = 0.53 J/cm2
3000 K > 1897 K (Ba)
3700 K > 3345 K (Y)
EDS spectra show the composition of area 1 and area 2.
314-
1-3-6
m 101.14 KmJ 102.86 /
mJ 0.1
×=×==Δ
≈
VCCVWTW
Summary
The surface microstructure of YBCO thin films can be manipulated by properly controlling the fluence of the irradiating femtosecond laser.
A ripple pattern was clearly observed on the surface of one YBCO thin film.
The (001)-YBCO film turns into nanodot arraywith the superconductivity remains almost intact.
Serve as a new way of engineering the material surfaces into nanometer scale structures.B. K. Nayak, et al., Appl. Phys. A 90, 399 (2008)Formation of nano-textured conical microstructures in titanium metal surface
Students: H. C. Shih, C. C. Lee, H. I. Wang, W. T. Tang
Solid State Lab: K. H. Wu, J. Y. Juang, J.-Y. Lin, T. M. Uen
NSRRC: J. M. Chen, J. M. Lee
Acknowledgements
Thank you
for your attention!!