+ All Categories
Home > Health & Medicine > Ultrasound confirmation of endotracheal tube placement

Ultrasound confirmation of endotracheal tube placement

Date post: 21-Jan-2018
Category:
Upload: scgh-ed-cme
View: 178 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
26
Ultrasound confirmation of endotracheal tube placement Dr James Wheeler BSc MBBS FACEM DDU Emergency Physician, SCGH
Transcript

Ultrasound confirmation of

endotracheal tube placement

Dr James Wheeler BSc MBBS FACEM DDUEmergency Physician, SCGH

Will this replace traditional

methods of ETT confirmation?

• Specifically, does this replace capnography and

auscultation

• NO!

• But no single confirmatory method is entirely reliable in

emergency situations, and in certain circumstance US

confirmation can be a very helpful adjunct

Why would you do it?

• Transtracheal ultrasound is a relatively SIMPLE technique

• FAST (~8 sec vs 18 sec for capnography1)

• May be more reliable than capnography changes in certain patient groups?

• SENSITIVE and SPECIFIC 2,3,4

• The pooled sensitivity and specificity for the detection of proper ETT placement

with US were:

• Sensitivity: 98% (95% C.I. 97-99%); Specificity: 98% (95% C.I. 95-99%);

PPV: 99.5%, NPV: 93.8%

• Does not require ventilations to assess tube placement

• May prevent gastric insufflation and delay in diagnosis of misplacement

When would you use it?

• ETCO2 unreliable or not available

• Cardiac arrest / massive PE

• Emergency blind intubation

• Patient arrives intubated and requires rapid confirmation of

ETT placement

• Any patient not responding as expected after ETT

placement prior to attempting re-intubation

How do you do it?

Direct (Transtracheal)

• Looking for evidence of direct endotracheal intubation or oesophageal intubation (a “second trachea”)

• During intubation OR Post-intubation

Indirect (Transthoracic)

• Looking at the pleural space for evidence of lung ventilation (pleural movement)

• Post-intubation

Direct: Technique

Probe:

• high frequency (6-12MHz) linear probe (but

can use lower freq micro convex or

curvilinear in obese)

Preset:

• Superficial, depth sufficient to see posterior

to trachea, focal zone at trachea

Probe placement:

• in transverse plane just above the

suprasternal notch

• i.e. beneath cricoid

Direct: Technique

Endotracheal intubation:

• One air-mucosal interface

• Hyperechoic reverberation artifacts inside trachea

OR

Oesophageal intubation:

• Dynamic opening of the oesophagus by the ETT seen on US performed during laryngoscopy

• Two air-mucosal interfaces (“two tracheas” , “double track sign”)

• Hyperechoic reverberation artifacts inside oesophagus

May also interrogate cuff position by infiltrating saline

Direct: US Anatomy

Direct: Tracheal Intubation

Direct - Oesophageal Intubation

Indirect

• Looking at the pleural space for evidence of lung

ventilation (pleural movement)

• Differential pleural movement may indicate RMS

intubation

• Requires ventilation

Indirect US Anatomy

Indirect: Ventilating Lung

Indirect: Non-Ventilating Lung

Indirect: Pneumothorax

Indirect: PTX Lung Point

Pitfalls?

• Requires access to US machine

• No single confirmatory method is entirely reliable (esp. in

emergency situations)

• Operator dependent

• Surgical emphysema can obscure view

• Can’t identify supraglottic airway

• Pneumothorax (for indirect)

References

1. Reliability of Ultrasonography in Confirming Endotracheal Tube

Placement in an Emergency Setting. Vimal Koshy, Thomas et al.

Indian J Crit Care Med. 2017 May; 21(5): 257–261.

2. Transtracheal ultrasound for verification of endotracheal tube

placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Das SK1, Choupoo

NS, Haldar R, Lahkar A. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Apr;62(4):413-23

3. Ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement: A

systematic review and meta-analysis. Eric H.Chou et al. Resuscitation,

Volume 90, May 2015, 97-103

4. Can Transtracheal Ultrasonography Be Used to Verify Endotracheal

Tube Placement? Gottlieb M, Bailitz J .Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;

66(4): 394-5


Recommended