+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Un Aerobic

Un Aerobic

Date post: 03-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: magdalene-hanah
View: 219 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 21

Transcript
  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    1/21

    1Low Temperature Thermo - chemical Pretreatment of Dairy Waste

    Activated Sludge for Anaerobic Digestion Process

    .

    Abstract

    An investigation into the influence of low temperature thermo-chemical pretreatment on sludge

    reduction in a semi-continuous anaerobic reactor was performed. Firstly, effect of sludge

    pretreatment was evaluated by COD solubilization, suspended solids reduction and biogas

    production. At optimized condition (60C with pH 12), COD solubilization, suspended solids

    reduction and biogas production was 23%, 22% and 51% higher than the control, respectively.

    Secondly, semi - continuous process performance was studied in a lab-scale semi-continuous

    anaerobic reactor (5L), with 4L working volume. With three operated SRTs, the SRT of 15 days

    was found to be most appropriate for economic operation of the reactor. Combining pretreatment

    with anaerobic digestion led to 80.5%, 117% and 90.4% of TS, SS and VS reduction

    respectively, with an improvement of 103% in biogas production. Thus, low temperature thermo-

    chemical can play an important role in reducing sludge production.

    1 1 *Corresponding author: Dr. J. Rajesh Banu, Department of Civil Engineering, Anna

    University of Technology Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli - 627007, India. Tel: 9444215544, Email

    id:[email protected].

  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    2/21

    Keywords: Waste Activated Sludge, Solubilization, Thermo-chemical pretreatment, Biogas,

    Biodegradability, Anaerobic Digestion.

    1. Introduction

    Dairy industry is one of the prime sectors in India. Studies say that Indian dairy industries have a

    growth at more than 15% and are estimated to cross 150 million tons per annum. Water

    management in the dairy industry is well documented, but effluent production and disposal

    remain a problematic issue for the dairy industry. Proper management of excess sludge is a big

    challenge to wastewater treatment operators because sludge handling and disposal accounts for

    up to 60% of total treatment plant operating costs (Neyens and Baeyens, 2003). Anaerobic

    digestion is of particular interest in sludge treatment since it can reduce the overall amount of

    sludge to be disposed, while producing an energy-rich biogas that can be valorized energetically

    (Appels et al., 2010). Anaerobic digestion thus optimizes wastewater treatment costs, its

    environmental footprint and is considered a major and essential part of a modern wastewater

    treatment plant. Anaerobic degradation can be achieved through several stages: hydrolysis,

    acidogenesis, acetogenesis and methanogenesis. Anaerobic digestion of sludge is hampered due

    to the rigid structure of the microbial cell walls, protecting the inner cell products. Hence,

    hydrolysis of sludge requires longer retention time and has been pointed as the rate limiting step.

    In order to improve the rate of hydrolysis and the anaerobic digestion performance, sludge

    disintegration was developed as a pre-treatment process to accelerate the anaerobic digestion and

    to increase the degree of stabilization. Increasing the degree of sludge stabilization using a

    disintegration process provides less sludge production, more stable sludge and more biogas

    production compared with classical anaerobic digestion. Various methods like Ultrasonic

    treatment (Pham et al., 2009), Ozone oxidation (Ahn et al., 2002), alkaline treatment (Lin et al.,

  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    3/21

    2007), thermal treatment (Barjenbruch and Kopplow, 2003), Fenton process (Kaynak and

    Filibeli, 2008) and biological hydrolysis with enzymes (Ayol et al., 2008) were investigated for

    sludge disintegration by several researchers in half-scale and lab-scale plants to bypass the rate

    limiting stage of hydrolysis. Mechanical treatment employs several strategies for physically

    disintegrating the cells and partly solubilizing their content. Although less results are available

    for the other pretreatment methods, it is seen that their efficiency of improving anaerobic

    digestion of sludge is rather low, compared to the other methods. Ultrasonic pretreatment is the

    alternate method to disrupt sludge cells without doubt. Although cell disintegrations of 100% can

    be obtained at high-power levels, power consumption thus becomes a serious problem, and the

    ultrasound probes need replacement every 1.5 to 2 yrs, which causes great concerns on its

    practical application (Zhang et al., 2007). However its application as a sludge pretreatment

    process in anaerobic digestion is scarcely mentioned.

    The heat treatment of waste activated sludge was shown to be an effective pretreatment method

    for anaerobic digestion. The optimum treatment conditions and digestion improvement are

    largely depending on the nature of the sludge. Various temperatures, ranging from 60 to 270C

    have been studied in literature. However, temperatures higher than 180C lead to the production

    of recalcitrant soluble organics or toxic/inhibitory intermediates, hence reducing the

    biodegradability (Wilson and Novak, 2009). The only alternative to overcome this drawback is

    the application of low temperature treatment, and it has been pointed out as an effective

    treatment for increasing biogas production (Climent et al., 2007). In thermo-chemical methods,

    an acid or base is added to solubilize the sludge. The addition of acid or base avoids the necessity

    of high temperature and these methods are carried out at ambient or moderate temperatures.

    These methods are shown to be effective and cumbersome for sludge solubilization. The

  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    4/21

    objective of the current work is to study the solubilization of organic and inorganic compounds

    during thermo-chemical treatment and the effects on anaerobic biodegradability. Finally, this

    thermo-chemical pretreatment was combined with semi continuous anaerobic digesters in order

    to evaluate their effects in terms of solids reduction and of biogas production.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1 Sludge sampling and characterization

    The Waste activated sludge was obtained from a dairy plant at Tirunelveli in Tamil Nadu (India).

    Samples were collected and stored at 4C. The Characteristics of the raw sludge were as follows:

    pH was 6.96, CODS (SCOD) was 420 mg/L, Total COD (TCOD) was 22000 mg/L, Total solids

    (TS) content was 8513 mg/L, Volatile solids (VS) content was 5160 mg/L, Suspended solids

    (SS) content was 4700 mg/L, Proteins was 780 mg/L and Carbohydrates were 320 mg/L.

    2.2 Thermo-chemical Pretreatment

    In this study, the effect of low temperature thermo-chemical pretreatment was investigated. The

    low temperature thermo-chemical pretreatment was carried out at 50, 60, 70 and 80C in order to

    enhance solubilization of particulate material, as well as enzymatic hydrolysis. The effect of

    thermo-chemical treatment depends on both temperature and time. In this work, the effect of

    pretreatment time was evaluated by taking samples at different pretreatment times (6, 9, 12, 24,

    36 and 48 h) in order to study the combined effect.

    Batch reactors containing 1L of sludge were submerged in a thermostatic bath at various

    temperatures (50, 60, 70 and 80C) during 6, 9, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h. The reactors were covered

    with an aluminium foil, to avoid water evaporation. The sludge in the reactor was kept in

    suspension by a slow-speed stirrer (Digital Overhead IKA RW 20), to ensure temperature

  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    5/21

    homogeneity. For the waste activated sludge studied, different concentrations of NaOH were

    added to reach different pH values of 10, 11 and 12. Even though, sodium decrease the

    dewaterability of the sludge, the choice of this alkaline agent was made from different studies

    indicated that, for anaerobic digestion, pretreatment with NaOH was more efficient than using

    other alkaline agents (Kim et al., 2003, Lin et al., 1997). The negative influence of sodium over

    sludge dewaterability is reduced when NaOH is combined with other treatment methods such as

    microwave and thermal (Jin et al., 2009; Ilgin and Dilek., 2009). Dewaterability of the sodium

    pretreated sludge can be improved by the subsequent sludge management using lime. Banu et al.,

    (in press) have used lime to decrease the capillary suction time of sodium pretreated sludge.

    2.3 Biochemical methane potential assay

    Biogas production of raw and pretreated sludge samples at various temperatures (50 to 80C) for

    6, 9, 12, 24 h was initially determined by batch tests at mesophilic conditions. After pretreatment

    applications and before the reactor setup, pH of all pretreated samples was neutralized to 7. The

    biodegradability assays were conducted in batch reactors with 300 mL serum bottles. The rumen

    micro-organisms of cattle dung were used as an inoculum. Moreover in case of anaerobic

    biodegradability, the use of a highly active animal inoculum waste will reduce the experimental

    time significantly, or reduced the amount of inoculum required in full-scale batch digesters, and

    consequently, the corresponding digester volume (Borja et al., 2003). Each serum bottle was

    filled with 100 g of inoculum and 50 g of substrate. A blank treatment with only 150 g of

    inoculum was used to determine biogas production due to endogenous respiration. After adding

    the substrates and inoculum, the reactors were closed with a rubber septum and an aluminium

    seal to make them air tight and was subsequently purged with nitrogen gas at the rate of 10 mL

    per second for 20 minutes into the reactors to maintain anaerobic conditions. Bottles were

  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    6/21

    maintained at 35C under shaking (220 rpm). Batch reactors were operated with a residence time

    of 50 days. Samples were analyzed in duplicate. Enhancement of biodegradability was evaluated

    by comparison of biogas volumes produced by treated and untreated samples.The anaerobic

    biodegradability tests performance was evaluated by fitting the cumulative biogas production

    data to the modified Gompertz equation. The Gompertz equation describes cumulative biogas

    production assuming that, biogas production is a function of bacterial growth (Redzwan and

    Banks, 2004). The modified Gompertz equation is presented below:

    B = P {1-exp [-Rm (t-) / P]}

    Where B is the cumulative biogas production (mL), Rm is the maximum biogas production rate,

    P is the biogas yield potential (mL), and is the duration of lag phase, days. Using Matlab 7.0,

    the unknown parameters were calculated in order to measure the difference between the

    experimental measurement and the corresponding stimulated value.

    2.4 Anaerobic digestion reactors

    Two identical laboratory scale semi continuous reactors with a working volume of 4L were used

    as anaerobic digesters at mesophilic temperature (35C). Among the two, one is designated as

    Control Semi Continuous Anaerobic Reactor (CSCAR) which acts as control and another is

    designated as Experimental Semi Continuous Anaerobic Reactor (ESCAR), where sludge

    reduction was carried out. Sludge retention times (SRT) of 20, 15 and 12 days were sequentially

    tried to investigate the performance of the anaerobic digestion of the pretreated sludge. A control

    reactor fed with untreated sludge was operated at same SRTs. Feeding and withdrawals were

    carried out each day by peristaltic pumps in a semi continuous mode. Biogas production was

    measured by water moving in graduated test tubes linked to the reactors.

  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    7/21

    2.5 Analytical parameters

    The following parameters were analyzed before and after thermo-chemical treatment: Total

    Solids (TS), Suspended Solids (SS), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Carbohydrate

    concentration, Protein concentration and pH as per Standard Methods for the Examination of

    Water and Wastewater (American Public Health Association, 2005). The analyses were

    performed on both the sludge and the supernatant to identify the total and soluble fractions of the

    specific component. TS, VS and SS were measured in the whole sludge (Total TS, VS and SS)

    and in the supernatant after centrifugation at 30,130 x g, for 15 min and subsequent filtration

    through 0.45 m microfiber filter paper. VFA was analyzed by distillation-titration method, and

    the result was expressed in acetic acid. The methane content in the biogas was analyzed using a

    Baroda gas chromatograph equipped with a thermal conductivity detector and porapack Q

    column with hydrogen as carrier gas at a flow rate of 40 mL/min.

    Protein concentration was determined on total sludge and on the supernatant using the Lowry

    method (Takahashi et al., 2009). After reactions with salts and Folin's phenol reagent,

    absorbance of samples was determined at 620 nm, using a spectrophotometer. Folin's phenol

    reagent is a mixture ofphosphomolybdate and phosphotungstate used for the

    colorimetric assay of phenolic and polyphenolic antioxidants. It works by measuring the amount

    of the substance being tested needed to inhibit the oxidation of the reagent. Carbohydrate

    concentration was determined on total sludge and on the supernatant using the anthrone method

    (Tapia et al., 2009). After reactions with anthrone and sulphuric acid, absorbance of samples was

    determined at 625 nm, using a spectrophotometer. The increase in SCOD was calculated as given

    below:

    (SCOD after pretreatmentSCOD before pretreatment)

    X 100SCOD (%) =

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphomolybdatehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphotungstatehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assayhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyphenolhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyphenol_antioxidanthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyphenol_antioxidanthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyphenolhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assayhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphotungstatehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphomolybdate
  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    8/21

    SCOD before pretreatment

    3. Results and discussion

    3.1 Thermo-chemical pretreatment

    In this study, thermo-chemical pretreatment of waste activated sludge was performed to improve

    the treatment efficiency. The control was performed using non-pretreated WAS. The treatment

    was performed for different temperature and treatment time. The expected effect of the thermo-

    chemical treatment of sludge was an increase in soluble materials, with interest focused on

    SCOD solubilization, suspended solids reduction and biogas production, thus enhancing

    hydrolysis.

    3.1.1. COD solubilization and SCOD release

    The pretreatment was done to improve the bioavailability of sludge particulate material. SCOD

    calculations were considered the main parameter for evaluation of sludge particulate material,

    and it enables an evaluation of the maximum level of sludge solubilization. Increased SCOD is

    determined as the substance that can be readily used to produce methane during anaerobic

    digestion (Wang et al., 2005). The SCOD of pretreated sludge increased with increasing

    temperature. Fig.1a. shows the optimization of time and pH for COD solubilization during low

    temperature thermo-chemical pretreatment. From the figure, it is evident that, as the treatment

    time was increased from 6 to 24 h, an increase in COD solubilization was observed. This may be

    due to the disruption of chemical bonds in cell walls and membranes by thermo-chemical

    treatment. Therefore intracellular organic material is released to the liquid phase and increases

    the SCOD (Appels et al., 2010, Banu et al., 2009). As reaction time increases from 24 to 48 h

    SCOD was found to be decreased. The sludge is subjected to low temperature thermo-chemical

  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    9/21

    treatment for a significantly prolonged time (24 h). Thermal treatments are prone to enhance the

    formation of refractory substances. The fall in SCOD after 24 h might be due to the formation of

    refractory substances. Thus, for the waste activated sludge sample, a treatment time of 24 h was

    found to be the optimum. Similarly, a pH 10 seems to be too low for an effective COD

    solubilization, since even after a treatment time for 24 h only a very limited amount was set free.

    Thus, in order to achieve better solubilization, pH 12 was considered to be an optimum

    condition. Likewise, at 50C for pH 12, the COD solubilization was found only 17%. However,

    for 60, 70 and 80C irrespective of pH, the temperature plays a major role in enhancing COD

    solubilization, and it was found to be 23, 24 and 25% respectively. From the above, it is clear

    that temperature above 60C doesnt help in solubilizing the excess sludge. Thus, comparing cost

    economics and considering energy generation, low temperature thermo-chemical treatment

    (60C) was considered to be an optimum condition for rupturing cell membranes. The study is

    carried out at low temperature range of 50 - 80C which are less intense when compared to high

    temperatures. Thus, the solubilization doesnt show a rapid rise, but the overall solubilization for

    the treatment is satisfactory.

    3.1.2. SS Reduction

    SS reduction is an indication of sludge stability, and it is used for assessing the effectiveness of a

    process in stabilizing sludge (Gholamreza et al., 2008). Fig.1b. shows the optimization of time

    and pH for SS reduction during low temperature thermo-chemical pretreatment. From the figure,

    it is evident that, as the treatment time was increased from 6 to 24 h, an increase in SS reduction

    was observed. The main reason for mass reduction of sludge during the thermo-chemical

    pretreatment might be to rupture the cell wall and to release of extracellular and intracellular

    matter. Thus, it is evident that at 60C with pH 12, COD solubilization and SS reduction was

  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    10/21

    found to be 23 and 22% respectively, which might be regarded as a threshold for the pre-

    digestion step. In contrast, pH was found to be decreased during thermo-chemical pretreatment,

    and it may be explained by acidic compounds formation due to floc disintegration. Lipids were

    hydrolyzed to volatile fatty acids, and these compounds led to be decreased pH (Bougrier et al.,

    2005).

    3.1.3. Soluble Carbohydrate and Protein release

    Cell lysis releases protein content into the medium is the first stage of floc disintegration.

    Proteins are the principal constituents of organisms, and they contain carbon, which is a common

    organic substance as well as hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen (Nah et al., 2000). For this reason, it

    was considered that as the level of soluble protein increased, the efficiency of anaerobic

    digestion would be improved. Due to thermo-chemical treatment, solids were solubilized,

    especially organic solids. Fig.2. Presents the solubilization rate calculated for proteins and

    carbohydrates for the samples. As given in figure, a higher pH value of 12 led to more

    carbohydrate and protein releases than pH 10. Increase in the carbohydrate and protein releases

    with the increase in pH was stated by Chen et al (2007). Furthermore, it was found that increase

    in temperature doesnt play a major role, i.e., the solubilization rate increases linearly with

    temperature only till 60C, after which the rise is nearly flat. Thus, 60 C with pH 12 is significant

    for protein and carbohydrates release. According to Liu and Fang (2002), during the sludge

    treatment with NaOH, protein is released more compared to carbohydrate and this result is

    similar to that obtained in the present study. The protein releases presented in the figure are the

    sums of protein released from EPS as well as the cell lysis. Hence protein concentration is more

    than carbohydrate.

    3.1.4. Biochemical methane potential assay

  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    11/21

    Biodegradability batch assay was carried out to assess the feasibility of using thermo-chemical

    pre-treatment to improve the anaerobic biological degradation of dairy sludge. Biodegradability

    assays, in which cumulative biogas production was monitored, were assessed to both raw and

    pre-treated substrates under mesophilic conditions. Cumulative biogas production in serum

    bottles was maintained for 50 days, and the biogas production was monitored every day. Daily

    biogas was measured by inserting the needle attached to a syringe (10 and 25 mL). The gas

    pressure in the bottle displaces the syringe plunger, and the displaced volume was recorded. The

    results showed that thermo-chemical pretreatment of dairy sludge improved anaerobic

    degradation. Comparative analysis of biogas generation is depicted in Fig.3a. It was observed

    that, initial biogas production up to day 5 was similar in all cases, and this may be due to the

    acclimatization. The increase in biogas production was observed for 60, 70 and 80C pretreated

    sludge and there is no significant difference between biogas productions. The accumulated

    biogas production at the end of 50 days of the digestion period, was nearly 415 mL for raw

    sample, and at 60C with pH 12 it was around 845 mL, nearly 51% higher biogas production was

    obtained than the raw sludge. These results suggest that a low temperature thermo- chemical

    pretreatment enhances the biogas production. After 50 days of the digestion period, the biogas

    production ceased indicating that the digestate did not undergo any further degradation.

    Fig.3b. shows the model fit with the experimental data (solid line), from each assay (circles) for

    the samples. Table 1 presents the kinetic parameters obtained in the optimization process. From

    the experiment conducted, it can be noted that biogas production is enhanced by an increase in

    temperature from 50C (535 mg/L) to 60C (845 mg/L) by 57%. When further increase up to

    80

    C (890 mg/L) the increase in biogas production is only 5.3%. The trend of biogas production

    (Rm and P values from Table 1) shows that the solubilization of sludge at 60C with pH 12

  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    12/21

    attributes to the significant biogas production. Increasing the temperature has not influenced the

    process to a larger extent other than power consumption. At 60C with pH 12 the lag time for

    biogas production is decreased to 0.99 from 1.4 at 50C. The values were calculated for all

    experimental conditions and are found to be fit (which are not shown).

    3.2 Semi continuous anaerobic digestion reactors

    During this part of the study, the dairy sludge was thermo-chemically pretreated at 60C with pH

    12 was used as a feed. In a semi continuous anaerobic reactors, steady state is assessed by the

    stability of daily gas production, TS, SS and VS concentrations digested sludge from each

    reactor. With this assessment after 50 days, the fluctuations in these parameters were less than

    10% and it was believed that steady state was achieved. Results obtained after reactor

    stabilization is reported in Table 2.

    3.2.1 SRT Variation

    During the total period of 200 days, the performance evaluation of Semi continuous anaerobic

    reactors was carried out at three different SRTs such as 20, 15 and 12 days. The particular SRT

    was maintained constant by feeding the sludge at a constant rate by the peristaltic pump. The

    feeding was initialized with low organic loading rate of 3.55 g VS/Ldfor maintaining a long SRT

    of 20 days. The SRT was shifted to the next lower value and so on, once the reduction

    efficiencies of TS, SS, and VS were found to be consistent with a particular SRT. At individual

    SRTs, steady state of operations was retrieved and the results mentioned were average of five

    consecutive consistent readings. It was observed that the overall performance efficiency in terms

    of reduction in TS, SS and VS was lowering down as the SRT was lowered.

    3.2.2 pH

  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    13/21

    The digester performance was influenced by pH. The value and stability of the pH in an

    anaerobic reactor are extremely important because methanogenesis only proceeds at a high rate,

    when the pH is maintained in the neutral range. pH values in these experimental remained in the

    range from 7.9 to 7.1 during anaerobic digestion. It was observed that during every shift to the

    next lower SRT, the pH dropped rapidly. The dropping down of pH at shorter SRT is due to the

    high organic loading rate, which results in high VFA concentration during the acidogenesis

    phase. The results reveal that, digester could maintain their pH themselves though higher organic

    loading was supplied.

    3.2.3 Alkalinity

    pH cannot be an effective measure of the stability of an anaerobic process when there is a high

    buffering capacity (Bprnsson et al., 2000). Under this condition, alkalinity levels reveal a

    potential anaerobic process performance directly. The alkalinity of a steady system is between

    1000 and 5000 mg CaCO3 L-1

    (Ren and Wang, 2004). Lower values of effluent alkalinity warn

    about the impending reactor failure. The variation of pH and alkalinity with digestion time is

    presented in Fig.4a. The alkalinity of feed sludge and digested sludge varied significantly as

    pretreatments were used. The ESCAR digester had higher alkalinity compared to CSCAR due to

    the addition of NaOH. At 20 and 15 days SRTs, the effluent alkalinity levels were 19% and 34%

    more than the influent alkalinity. Manariotis and Grigoropoulos (2002) observed the increased

    levels between 19 and 21%, while Bodkhe (2009) observed the range of 25 to 33%. Similar to

    pH, the alkalinity reduced at shorter SRT is since a more organic matter was supplied, it

    eventually increased with acid generation and subsequently neutralizes the alkalinity capacity.

    3.2.4 Volatile Fatty Acids

  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    14/21

    Volatile fatty acids are considered as a central parameter that governs the healthiness of the

    anaerobic treatment (Pind et al., 2002). These are the most important intermediates, where they

    are degraded by proton-reducing acetogens in association with hydrogen consuming

    methanogenic bacteria (Mechichi and Sayadi., 2005). Thus, VFA determination in conjunction

    with pH measurement is an essential prerequisite for maintainance of desired environmental

    conditions in the anaerobic reactor. Fig.4b. presented the VFA Concentration of anaerobic

    digester which followed the trend of increasing, firstly, and then decreasing. The VFA

    concentration varied in a range of 227-790 mg/L and fell well within the recommended value for

    healthy anaerobic digestion. As a result of increased concentrations of VFA, the acids

    accumulate and the pH decreases to such a low value that the hydrolysis and acetogenesis can be

    inhibited (Siegert and Banks, 2005). The average VFA concentration of ESCAR (363 mg/L)

    was found to be lower than CSCAR (590 mg/L) indicating greater utilization of VFA by

    methanogens and subsequent biogas production in ESCAR. According to Dearman and Bentham

    (2006), when VFA concentration started to decrease, biogas production rate increase.

    3.2.5 TS removal

    Fig.5a. shows the variation of TS in digested sludge. For TS removal, CSCAR was in the range

    of 6.1 to 9.6% and digester ESCAR 13 to 25.1%. TS analysis shows that there was an increase of

    161% in TS reduction when compared with CSCAR, since TS reduction was 25.1% in ESCAR

    at 15 days SRT. The results revealed that thermo-chemical is an effective technique for breaking

    down the microbial cells or difficult hydrolyzed compounds to easy biodegradable compounds.

    3.2.6 SS and VS removal

  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    15/21

    The SS and VS reductions can be regarded as the reductions that are expected to be achieved in

    total mass of sludge. The variation of SS and VS removal is graphically presented in Fig.5b. For

    SS removal, CSCAR was in the range of 17 to 19.5% and digester ESCAR was in the range of

    33 to 39.2%. The highest SS removal achieving from ESCAR digester at 15 days SRT was

    39.2% with an increase of 101% over CSCAR. Thus, a pretreatment with thermo-chemical gave

    a great advantage in SS removal improvement compared to non-pretreatment.

    For VS removal, CSCAR was in the range of 14 to 17% and digester ESCAR 25 to 33%. The VS

    removal of ESCAR at 20 and 15 days SRT was almost constant and slightly reduced at 12 days

    SRT. However, it reduced for CSCAR from long to short SRT. This higher performance is due

    to the combination effects of thermal and chemical, which help to break down the microbial cells

    for faster subsequent degradation. It eventually facilitates the decomposition reaction which

    leads to biodegrade more compounds in the digester.

    3.2.7 Biogas production

    Fig.6. shows the comparison of biogas production of the digesters at different SRTs. The first

    SRT (20 days) was started at digestion run time of 55 days until 115 days, then second SRT (15

    days) until 165 days, and finally, the third SRT (12 days) until 200 days. By comparing to

    control, the methane production of thermo-chemically pretreated sludge increased by 90, 109 and

    111% at 20, 15 and 12 days SRT, respectively. It clearly showed that the methane production

    rate appreciably increased from 20 to 15 days SRT, while minor improvement was observed

    from 15 to 12 days SRT. The methane content in the biogas varied from 65 to 70%. The higher

    gas production in thermo-chemically pretreated sludge evidently indicated that it hydrolyzed

    more organic material solution, which is immediate used by anaerobic bacteria and eventually

  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    16/21

    facilitates the digestion processes. Furthermore, the biogas production rate was high at short SRT

    and low at long SRT. Once the SRT was reduced, the organic loading rate automatically

    increases, which eventually come to over loading phenomenon. It was clearly shown by

    dropping pH at 12 days SRT. Therefore, by considering both biogas and methane production,

    SRT of 15 days was found to be the suitable retention time for effective sludge degradation.

    3.2.8 Selection of pertinent SRT

    The minimum SRT at which the reactor yields the designed treatment efficiency highly

    influences the reactor volume, its compactness and the economy of operation. The economic

    viability of sludge management is not feasible when the reactor volume is larger. Therefore, the

    selection of the most suitable minimum possible SRT is very important to ensure the cost-

    effectiveness of the reactor operation. The results obtained at various SRTs identified, the SRT

    of 15 days to be the most appropriate SRT for economic operation of the reactor.

    4. Conclusions

    The influence of low temperature thermo-chemical pretreatment of dairy sludge was studied. At

    60C with pH 12, COD solubilization and suspended Solids reduction was 23% and 22% higher

    than that of control. BMP assay results of pretreated sludge confirmed that the observed

    solubilization led to an increase in sludge biodegradability, nearly 51% higher biogas production

    than control. Thus, 60C with pH 12 was chosen for semi-continuous digesters and by

    combining pretreatment with anaerobic digestion led to 80.5%, 117% and 90.4% of TS, SS and

    VS reduction respectively, with an improvement of 103% in biogas production.

    Acknowledgements

  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    17/21

    Authors are thankful to Department of Biotechnology, India for partial financial assistant to this

    project (BT/PR13124/GBD/27/192/2009) under their scheme Rapid Grant for Young

    Investigator (RGYI).

    References

    Ahn, K.H., Park, K.Y., Maeng, S.K., Hwang, J.G., Lee, J.W., Song, K.G., Chai, S., 2002.

    Ozonation of wastewater sludge for reduction and recycling. Water Sci. Technol. 46, 71 - 77.

    American Public Health Association (APHA), 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of

    Water and Wastewater, 21st Edition, Washington DC.

    Appels, L., Degrve, J., Van der Bruggen, B., Van Impe, J., Dewil, R., 2010. Influence of low

    temperature thermal pre-treatment on sludge solubilization, heavy metal release and

    anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol.101, 5743 - 5748.

    Ayol, A., Filibeli, A., Sir, D., Kuzyaka, E., 2008. Aerobic and anaerobic bioprocessing of

    activated sludge: floc disintegration by enzymes. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A. Toxic /

    Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 43(13), 1528 - 1535.

    Banu, J.R., Kaliappan, S., Adishkumar, S., Uan D.K., Yeom, I.T., in press. A novel method of

    sludge pretreatment using the combination of alkalis. J. Environ. Biol. 33.

    Banu, J.R., Uan D.K., Yeom, I.T., 2009. Nutrient removal in an A2O - MBR reactor with sludge

    reduction. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 3820 - 3824.

  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    18/21

    Barjenbruch, M., Kopplow, O., 2003. Enzymatic, mechanical and thermal pre-treatment of

    surplus sludge. Adv. Environ. Res. 7, 715 - 720.

    Bodkhe. S.Y., 2009. A modified anaerobic baffled reactor for municipal wastewater treatment.

    J. Environ. Manage. 90, 2488 - 2493.

    Borja, R., Rincon, B., Roposo, F., Alba, J., Martin, A., 2003. Kinetics of mesophilic anaerobic

    digestion of the two-phase olive mill solid waste. Biochem. Eng. J. 15, 139 -145.

    Bougrier, C., Albasi, C., Delgens, J.P., 2005. Solubilization of waste activated sludge by

    ultrasonic treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 106, 163 - 169.

    Bprnsson, L., Murto, M., Mattiasson, B., 2000. Evaluation of parameters for monitoring an

    aerobic co-digestion process. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 54, 844 - 849.

    Chen, Y., Jiang, S., Yuan, H., Zhou, Q., Gu, G., 2007. Hydrolysis and acidification of waste

    activated sludge at different pHs. Water Res. 41. 683 - 689.

    Climent, M., Ferrer, I., Baeza, M.M., Artola, A., Vzquez, F., Font, X., 2007. Effects of

    secondary sludge pre-treatment on biogas production under thermophilic conditions. Chem.

    Eng. J. 133, 335 - 342.

    Dearman, B., Bentham, R.H., 2006. Anaerobic Digestion of food waste: comparing leachate

    exchange rates in sequential batch systems digesting food waste and biosolids. Waste

    Manage. 8, 1 - 8.

    Gholamreza, M., Hassan, A., Akram, J., 2008. Effect of ozonation on reduction of volume and

    mass of waste activated sludge. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 4(2), 122 - 127.

  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    19/21

    Ilgin, J., Dilek Sanin, F., 2009. Alkaline Solubilization and microwave irradiation as a combined

    sludge disintegration and minimization method. Water Res. 43, 2139 - 2148.

    Jin, Y., Li, H., Mahar, R.B., Wang, Z., Nie, Y., 2008. Combined alkaline and ultrasonic

    pretreatment of sludge before aerobic digestion. J. Environ. Sci. 21, 279 - 284.

    Kaynak, G.E., Filibeli, A., 2008. Assessment of Fenton process as a minimization technique for

    biological sludge: Effects on anaerobic sludge bioprocessing. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 5, 151 - 160.

    Kim, J., Park C., Kim, T.H., Lee, M., Kim, S., Kim, K., Lee, J., 2003. Effects of various

    pretreatments for enhanced anaerobic digestion with waste activated sludge. J. Biosci.

    Bioeng. 95 (3), 271 - 275.

    Lin, J.G., Chang, C.N., Chang, S.C., 2007. Enhancement of anaerobic digestion of waste

    activated sludge by alkaline solubilization. Bioresour. Technol. 62, 85 - 90.

    Liu, H., Fang, H.P., 2002. Extraction of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of sludges. J.

    Biotechnol. 95, 249 - 256.

    Manariotis, I.D., Grigoropoulos, S.G., 2002. Low strength wastewater treatment using an

    anaerobic baffled reactor. Water Environ. Res. 74 (2), 170 - 176.

    Mechichi, T., Sayadi, S., 2005. Evaluating process imbalance of anaerobic digestion of olive mill

    wastewaters. Process Biochem. 2, 139 - 145.

    Nah, I.W., Kang, Y.W., Hwang, K.Y., Song, W.K., 2000. Mechanical pre-treatment of waste

    activated sludge for anaerobic digestion process. Water Res. 34, 2362 - 2368.

    Neyens, E., Baeyens, J., 2003. A review of thermal sludge pre-treatment processes to improve

  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    20/21

    dewaterability. J. Hazard. Mater. 98, 51- 67.

    Pham, T.T.H., Brar, S.K., Tyagi, R.D., Surampalli, R.Y., 2009. Ultrasonication of wastewater

    sludge consequences on biodegradability and flowability. J. Hazard. Mater. 163, 891 - 898.

    Pind, F.P., Angelidaki, I., Ahring, B.K., 2002. Dynamics of the anaerobic process: effects of

    volatile fatty acids. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 82 (7), 791 - 801.

    Redzwan,G., Banks, C.H., 2004. The use of a specific function to estimate maximum methane

    production in a batch-fed anaerobic reactor. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 79, 1174 -1178.

    Ren, N.Q., Wang, A.J., 2004. The Method and Technology of Anaerobic Digestion. Chemical

    industry Press. 30 - 31.

    Siegert, I., Banks, C., 2005. The effect of volatile fatty acid additions on the anaerobic digestion

    of cellulose and glucose in batch reactors. Process Biochem. 40, 3412 - 3418.

    Takahashi, E., Ledauphin, J., Goux, D., Orvain, F., 2009. Optimizing Extraction of Extra cellular

    Polymeric Substances (EPS) from Benthic Diatoms: Comparison of Efficiency of Six EPS

    Extraction methods. Mar. Freshwater Res. 60 (12), 1201-1210.

    Tapia, J.M., Munoz, J.A., Gonzalez, F., Blazquez, L.M., Malki, M., 2009. Extraction of Extra

    cellular Polymeric Substances from the Acidophilic Bacterium Acidiphilium. Water Sci.

    Technol. 59 (10), 1959 - 1967.

    Wang, F., Wang, Y., Ji, M., 2005. Mechanisms and kinetic models for ultrasonic waste activated

    sludge disintegration. J. Hazard. Mater. 123, 145 - 150.

  • 7/28/2019 Un Aerobic

    21/21

    Wilson, C.A., Novak, J.T., 2009. Hydrolysis of macromolecular components of primary and

    secondary wastewater sludge by thermal hydrolytic pretreatment. Water Res. 43, 4489 -

    4498.

    Zhang, P.Y., Zhang, G.M., Wang, W., 2007. Ultrasonic treatment of biological sludge: Floc

    disintegration, cell lysis and inactivation. Bioresour. Technol. 98, 207- 210.


Recommended