+ All Categories
Home > Health & Medicine > Uncorrected Refractive Error in Presbyopes

Uncorrected Refractive Error in Presbyopes

Date post: 24-May-2015
Category:
Upload: ankit-punjabi
View: 1,494 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Uncorrected refractive error in presbyopes pose a significant problem. We hereby publish our results of screening of 100 presbyopes in which 47% were found to have uncorrected refractive error.
Popular Tags:
14
FREE PAPER – KSOC 2009 Uncorrected Refractive Errors in Presbyopes attending medical college Eye OPD Presenting Author : Dr. Ankit Punjabi (D.O.M.S. 2 nd yr) Co-Authors : •Dr. N.V.V. Himamshu (Prof & Head) •Dr. H.N. Sowbhagya (Professor) •Dr. Mrinmayee Ghatak (D.O.M.S. 2 nd yr) Department of Ophthalmology, Kempegowda Inst. of Med. Sciences Bangalore
Transcript
Page 1: Uncorrected Refractive Error in Presbyopes

FREE PAPER – KSOC 2009

Uncorrected Refractive Errors in Presbyopes attending medical college

Eye OPD

Presenting Author : Dr. Ankit Punjabi (D.O.M.S. 2nd yr)

Co-Authors :

•Dr. N.V.V. Himamshu (Prof & Head)

•Dr. H.N. Sowbhagya (Professor)

•Dr. Mrinmayee Ghatak (D.O.M.S. 2nd yr)

Department of Ophthalmology, Kempegowda Inst. of Med. Sciences

Bangalore

Page 2: Uncorrected Refractive Error in Presbyopes

OBJECTIVE

• To find out the prevalence of uncorrected refractive errors

in presbyopes attending Eye OPD in medical college in

Bangalore

Page 3: Uncorrected Refractive Error in Presbyopes

• Uncorrected refractive error in presbyopes is the second most common cause of treatable Visual Impairment in this age group worldwide

• In India about 35 million people in presbyope age group are visually impaired due to uncorrected refractive error (WHO 2004 bulletin)

• Average coverage of refractive services in India is just 40-55%

• This study aims to find out the prevalence in our clinic settings

INTRODUCTION

Page 4: Uncorrected Refractive Error in Presbyopes

MATERIALS & METHODS

Page 5: Uncorrected Refractive Error in Presbyopes

MATERIALS & METHODS

• Workup done by same post-graduate student• Preliminary data included age, sex• History was taken regarding:

– Diminision of vision for distance, near or both– Any spetacle usage (past or present)

• Complete ophthalmic examination was done including:– Distance / Near Visual Acuity– Objective Refraction & Subjective Refraction– Slit Lamp Examination– Fundoscopy

Page 6: Uncorrected Refractive Error in Presbyopes

RESULTS

53% 47%

Page 7: Uncorrected Refractive Error in Presbyopes

RESULTS

Page 8: Uncorrected Refractive Error in Presbyopes

RESULTS

11%

30%

21%

17%

17%

4%

Visual Acuity in Presbyopes with uncorrected refractive errors

VA - 6/6

VA - 6/9

VA - 6/12

VA - 6/18

VA - 6/24

VA - 6/36

Page 9: Uncorrected Refractive Error in Presbyopes

RESULTS

Page 10: Uncorrected Refractive Error in Presbyopes

70%

30%

Present or past spectacle usage in presbyopes with uncorrected

refractive errors

Not using Spectacles Using spectacles

RESULTS

Page 11: Uncorrected Refractive Error in Presbyopes

DISCUSSION

Page 12: Uncorrected Refractive Error in Presbyopes

LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

• Small Sample Size• Presbyopes with amblyopia / ocular disease /

surgery / trauma were not included

Page 13: Uncorrected Refractive Error in Presbyopes

CONCLUSION

• A significant population of presbyopes have uncorrected refractive errors

• Complete refraction of every presbyope patient should be performed

• Outreach programmes should infiltrate the refractive services into the general population

• Affordable refractive services should be developed

Page 14: Uncorrected Refractive Error in Presbyopes

1. Robert Abel, The Eye Care Revolution: Prevent and Reverse Common Vision Problems. Kensington Books, 2004.

2. Burke AG, Patel I, Munoz B, et al. Population-based study of presbyopia in rural Tanzania. Ophthalmol. 2006;113(5):723-727

3. Duarte WR, Barros AJD, Dias-da-Costa JS, Cattan JM. Prevalence of near vision deficiency and related factors: a population-based study in Brazil [in Portuguese]. Cad Saude Publica. 2003;19(2):551-559

4. Ramke J, du Toit R, Palagyi A, Brian G, Naduvilath T. Correction of refractive error and presbyopia in Timor-Leste. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(7):860-866

5. Nirmalan PK, Krishnaiah S, Shamanna BR, Rao GN, Thomas R. A population-based assessment of presbyopia in the state of Andhra Pradesh, south India: The Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47: 2324–8

6. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Mariotti SP, Pokharel GP. Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bull World Health Organ 2008;86(1):63-70

7. Taylor HR. Eye care for the future: theWeisenfeld lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44(4):1413-1418.

8. Dandona R, Dandona L. Refractive error blindness. Bull World Health Organ. 2001; 79(3):237-243.9. Dandona L, Dandona R. What is the global burden of visual impairment? BMC Med. 2006; 4:6.10.Dandona L, Dandona R, Srinivas M, Giridhar P, Vilas K et al. Blindness in the Indian State of Andhra

Pradesh. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42(5):908-91611.The Eye Disease Prevalence Research Group. The prevalence of Refractive Errors among adults in the

United States, Western Europe, and Australia. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:495-50512.Patel I, West SK. Presbyopia: Prevalence, impact, and interventions. Com Eye Health J 2007;20(63);40-41

Thank You


Recommended