mpLandscape Architecture PortfolioMacKenzie Patrick

mp

mp

landscape architecture portfolio

Community Design Studio - State College 22Community Design Studio - Juniata Valley 24

Landscape Materiality - Campus Plaza 8

Great Lakes Harbor Islands Design 26

Baltimore Ecological Study - Baltimore, MD 18

Center for Environmental Conservation Design 14

Landscape Materiality - Lakeview Apts 12Landscape Materiality - Gabion Module 13

Site Scale City Scale

Region Scale

4-13 13-27

27-35

Urban Fibers Site Plan - Rome, Italy 4

table of contents

4

mp Urban Fibers Site Master Plan - Rome, Lazio

[Re]Creating Piazza dei Ponte Sant’ Angelo

5

mpUrban Fibers Site Master Plan - Rome, Lazio

Concept:The re-creation of Piazza di Ponte Sant’ Angelo is intended to utilize and revitalize life along the Tiber River. The Piazza will expand and assign both new and existing public spaces. It will connect people to the city of Rome through carefully structured viewsheds.

Structural Sphere Framework-A steel structure with metal wires will create permeable enclosure over the new piazza.-The design emphasizes and reveals connections to Castel Sant’Angelo, by framing it’s shape and providing many viewing opportunities -Vegetation cover is hidden within the structural beams and provides shade to people inside-Viewing space is provided on the exterior balcony and through structural ‘doors’

Via dei Coronari: -Help to expand the dominance of pedestrian spaces and pathways over vehicular traffic-Spaces are linked to Tiber River through views and circulation

Location: Rome, LazioYear: Fall 2011 - Study AbroadSoftware: Adobe Suite CS5 AutoCAD 2011 Google Sketchup

URBAN FIBERSMASTERPLAN

6

mp Urban Fibers Site Master Plan - Rome, Lazio

Framing of Castel Sant’ Angelo

7

mpUrban Fibers Site Master Plan - Rome, Lazio

8

mp

3'

4'6" StairHeight

See 1c

3'8"

2'5"

1 14" Aluminum Hand Rail

Concrete Coping *See 1b

Nosing Bar *See 1cBrick Veneer Cheek Wall *See L2

Copper Flashing, No Weep Holes *See Construction Notes

Aluminum Railing Posts2" Tube Aluminum Railing End Post

Railing & Anchor at Coping*See Detail 1b

Stairs Foundation & Landing*See Detail 1c

Prepared Subgrade

Stairs Foundation & Landing*Similar to Detail 1c

9'7 34 " Stair Concrete Length

9' 10" Concrete Coping

8'6 78 " Length Between Foundations

2'3 18 "

2" Tube Aluminum Railing End Post*Similar End Post

2" Tube Aluminum Base Rail

6" Coping

2" Gap Under Railing

6 2 78 " �iddle Wall Segment 1' 10 12"Wall Segment

34 Aluminum Railing Posts

Stairs Foundation and LandingScale 1" � 1'

Stair, Wall, and RailingScale 1" � 1'

Railing and Anchor at CopingScale 1" � 1'

Construction Notes�1. Rebar: All rebar and nosing bar should be minimum2" from the edge of concrete to prevent breaking.Rebar should not go through key joints.

2. Coping: All coping should extend minimum 1" overedge of wall

3. Drainage: Copper Flashing: 1 inch copper flashingprotects the wall from water. Therefore, no weepholes are needed. There should be a 2% grade away

4. Epoxy fill - Fill should be placed, then Aluminumpost set in. Any displaced fill should be removed.

Detail

DetailSection

L33 o� 4

Re�

isio

ns�

Dra

wn

B�

� �

ac�

en�

ie P

atric

kD

ecem

ber 7

, 201

2C

heck

ed B

��

Re�

ised

B�

�R

e�is

ion

Dat

e�

Land

scap

e �

ater

ialit

� F

inal

Pro

�ec

t

Sta

irs, R

ailin

g an

d Fo

unda

tion

Det

ail

Con

stru

ctio

n N

otes

The

Pen

ns�

l�an

ia S

tate

Uni

�er

sit�

Dep

artm

ent o

� L

ands

cape

Arc

hite

ctur

eC

olle

ge o

� A

rts a

nd A

rchi

tect

ure

Fall

2012

� B

aird

, Bur

khol

der,

�ew

0 1' 2'6" 0 1' 2'6"

0 1' 2'6"

5. Brick: Standard Modular 3 58" by 2 14" by 7 58". Mortarshould be concave or rooded. Masonry grade shouldbe Sx. Brick wall is Flemish coursing. Brick copingshould extend mimimum 14" over edge of wall.

6. Limestone: Stones should be cut according to sizing

kept minimal.

approved by the Landscape Architect

Landscape Materiality Studio - Campus Plaza

9

mp

Concrete and Planter Detail L4

4L nalP retnalP dna gnivaP ,llaW

4L liateD nrettaP gnivaP enotsemiL

52.82 52.82

28.18

28.45 28.45

51.82 SOT

81.82

56.42 SOB

51.42 51.42

58.32 WB58.32 WB

�5.32 WB�5.32 WB

55.32 WB

�5.32 WB

26.32 WB

�5.32 WB

�5.32 WB

54.32 WB �3.32 WB

53.32 WB

28.18 28.18

82�2

2625

42

32

2

82

�2

62

52

42

1�2�

�.�.

1�2�

�.�.

1�2� �.�.

1�2� �.�.

1�2�

�.�

.

1�2�

�.�

.

1�2�

�.�

.

1�2�

�.�

.1�

2� �

.�.

1�2�

�.�

.

1�2�

C.�

. �See

notes

1�2�

C.�

. �See

notes

1�2�

C.�

. �See

notes

1�2�

C.�

. �See

notes

1�2�

C.�

. �See

notes

1�2�

C.�

. �See

notes

1�2�

C.�

. �See

notes

�W�L

�W�L

Site PlanScale 1

4� � 1�L1

1 o� 4

�ev

isio

ns�

Dra

�n

B�

� �

ac�

en�

ie P

atric

�D

ecem

�er

�, 2

�12

C�

ec�

ed B

��

�ev

ised

B�

��

evis

ion

Dat

e�

Land

sca�

e �

ater

ialit

� �

inal

Pro

�ec

t

Site

Pla

n an

d Lo

catio

n

T�e

Pen

ns�

lvan

ia S

tate

�ni

vers

it�D

e�ar

tmen

t o�

Lan

dsca

�e

�rc

�ite

ct�

reC

olle

ge o

� �

rts a

nd �

rc�

itect

�re

�al

l 2�

12 �

Bai

rd, B

�r�

�ol

der,

�e�

� 2� 4� 8�1�

3a

2�L2

2aL2

1�L2

1�L3

L2

3aL2

3� L2

3�L2

Landscape Materiality Studio-Campus Plaza

LANDSCAPEMATERIALITY

10

mp

3' or tofrost depth

1'4"4"4"

15" typ.

6"typ.

2% wash

6"

6"

6"

12" Expansion Joint (see plan)Key Joint

Concrete Footing

#3 Rebar Reinforcement*See Construction Notes

Limestone Paver in Setting Bedw/ Concrete Base (See L2)

Nosing Bar *See Construction Notes

Compacted Aggregate

8 stairs: 15" tread, 6" rise

Joint �owel

Prepared Subgrade

2" Aluminum Railing End Post

Epoxy Fill *See Construction Notes

34" Aluminum Railing Posts

�etal Fastener for Coping

�elded Aluminum �ubes

Bric� �ortar *See Construction Notes

Flemish Pattern Chee� �all*See Construction Notes

2'�8 "

6" �34"

�ole for Epoxy 212" wide

Stairs Foundation and LandingScale 1" � 1'

Stair, �all, and RailingScale 1" � 1'

Railing and Anchor at CopingScale 1" � 1'

Construction Notes:1. Rebar: All rebar and nosing bar should be minimum2" from the edge of concrete to prevent breaking.Rebar should not go through key joints.

2. Coping: All coping should extend minimum 1" overedge of wall

3. Drainage: Copper Flashing: 1 inch copper flashingprotects the wall from water. Therefore, no weepholes are needed. There should be a 2% grade away

4. Epoxy fill - Fill should be placed, then Aluminumpost set in. Any displaced fill should be removed.

�etail

�etailSection

L33 of 4

Rev

isio

ns:

�ra

wn

By:

�ac

Ken

�ie

Pat

ric�

�ec

embe

r �, 2

�12

Che

c�ed

By:

Rev

ised

By:

Rev

isio

n �

ate:

Land

scap

e �

ater

ialit

y Fi

nal P

ro�

ect

Sta

irs, R

ailin

g an

d Fo

unda

tion

�et

ail

Con

stru

ctio

n N

otes

�he

Pen

nsyl

vani

a S

tate

�ni

vers

ity�

epar

tmen

t of L

ands

cape

Arc

hite

ctur

eC

olle

ge o

f Arts

and

Arc

hite

ctur

e

Fall

2�12

� B

aird

, Bur

�ho

lder

, Kew

� 1' 2'6" � 1' 2'6"

� 1' 2'6"

5. Brick: Standard Modular 3 58" by 2 14" by 7 58". Mortarshould be concave or rooded. Masonry grade shouldbe Sx. Brick wall is Flemish coursing. Brick copingshould extend mimimum 14" over edge of wall.

6. Limestone: Stones should be cut according to sizing

kept minimal.

approved by the Landscape Architect

3' or tofrost depth

1'4"4"4"

15" typ.

6"typ.

2% wash

6"

6"

6"

12" Expansion Joint (see plan)Key Joint

Concrete Footing

#3 Rebar Reinforcement*See Construction Notes

Limestone Paver in Setting Bedw/ Concrete Base (See L2)

Nosing Bar *See Construction Notes

Compacted Aggregate

8 stairs: 15" tread, 6" rise

Joint �owel

Prepared Subgrade

2" Aluminum Railing End Post

Epoxy Fill *See Construction Notes

34" Aluminum Railing Posts

�etal Fastener for Coping

�elded Aluminum �ubes

Bric� �ortar *See Construction Notes

Flemish Pattern Chee� �all*See Construction Notes

2'�8 "

6" �34"

�ole for Epoxy 212" wide

Stairs Foundation and LandingScale 1" � 1'

Stair, �all, and RailingScale 1" � 1'

Railing and Anchor at CopingScale 1" � 1'

Construction Notes:1. Rebar: All rebar and nosing bar should be minimum2" from the edge of concrete to prevent breaking.Rebar should not go through key joints.

2. Coping: All coping should extend minimum 1" overedge of wall

3. Drainage: Copper Flashing: 1 inch copper flashingprotects the wall from water. Therefore, no weepholes are needed. There should be a 2% grade away

4. Epoxy fill - Fill should be placed, then Aluminumpost set in. Any displaced fill should be removed.

�etail

�etailSection

L33 of 4

Rev

isio

ns:

�ra

wn

By:

�ac

Ken

�ie

Pat

ric�

�ec

embe

r �, 2

�12

Che

c�ed

By:

Rev

ised

By:

Rev

isio

n �

ate:

Land

scap

e �

ater

ialit

y Fi

nal P

ro�

ect

Sta

irs, R

ailin

g an

d Fo

unda

tion

�et

ail

Con

stru

ctio

n N

otes

�he

Pen

nsyl

vani

a S

tate

�ni

vers

ity�

epar

tmen

t of L

ands

cape

Arc

hite

ctur

eC

olle

ge o

f Arts

and

Arc

hite

ctur

e

Fall

2�12

� B

aird

, Bur

�ho

lder

, Kew

� 1' 2'6" � 1' 2'6"

� 1' 2'6"

5. Brick: Standard Modular 3 58" by 2 14" by 7 58". Mortarshould be concave or rooded. Masonry grade shouldbe Sx. Brick wall is Flemish coursing. Brick copingshould extend mimimum 14" over edge of wall.

6. Limestone: Stones should be cut according to sizing

kept minimal.

approved by the Landscape Architect

Landscape Materiality Studio - Campus Plaza

11

mp

2"4"6"

50 mm (2") Cut Limestone w/ 38" mortar joints

*See Detail 1b

Brick Paver (At Expansion Joint)12" Expansion Joint and Dowel Fastener

100mm (4") Concrete Base

6" Aggregate BasecoursePrepared Subgrade

25mm (1") Mortar Setting Bed

#3 Rebar Reinforcement

Prepared Subgrade

50 mm (2") Cut Limestone w/ 38" mortar joints

*See Detail 1b

Brick Paver Edging12" Expansion Joint and Dowel Fastener

Concrete Base Foundation

6" Aggregate Basecourse

#3 Rebar Reinforcement

�eneer Fastener

Brick Coping (1") *See Construction �otes

Flemis� Coursing Brick �eneer Seat �all*See 1a� (Mortar) *See Construction �otes

See 3b

1�238"

Concrete Expansion Joint and Dowel Fastener

Brick Seating �all Side ElevationScale 1" � 1�

Brick Seating �all End ElevationScale 1 " � 1�

Building� Stairs and �all Site SectionScale 1

8" � 1�

Building Stairs and �all Front ElevationScale 1

8" � 1�

Brick Seating �all � Pavement DetailScale 1 " � 1�

Limestone Paving and Expansion JointScale 1 " � 1� L2

2 of 4

Rev

isio

ns�

Dra

wn

B�

� M

ac�

en�

ie P

atric

kD

ecem

ber �

� 2

012

C�

ecke

d B

��

Rev

ised

B�

�R

evis

ion

Dat

e�

Land

scap

e M

ater

ialit

� F

inal

Pro

ject

Bric

k S

eatin

g �

all�

Pav

emen

t Det

ails

Bui

ldin

g� S

tairs

and

Site

Ele

vatio

n

��

e P

enns

�lv

ania

Sta

te �

nive

rsit�

Dep

artm

ent o

f Lan

dsca

pe A

rc�

itect

ure

Col

lege

of A

rts a

nd A

rc�

itect

ure

Fall

2012

� B

aird

� B

urk�

olde

r� �

ew

0 1� 2�6" 0 1� 2�6"

0 1� 2�6"

0 1� 2�6"

0 1�2� 4� 8� 16�

0 1�2� 4� 8� 16�

2"4"6"

50 mm (2") Cut Limestone w/ 38" mortar joints

*See Detail 1b

Brick Paver (At Expansion Joint)12" Expansion Joint and Dowel Fastener

100mm (4") Concrete Base

6" Aggregate BasecoursePrepared Subgrade

25mm (1") Mortar Setting Bed

#3 Rebar Reinforcement

Prepared Subgrade

50 mm (2") Cut Limestone w/ 38" mortar joints

*See Detail 1b

Brick Paver Edging12" Expansion Joint and Dowel Fastener

Concrete Base Foundation

6" Aggregate Basecourse

#3 Rebar Reinforcement

�eneer Fastener

Brick Coping (1") *See Construction �otes

Flemis� Coursing Brick �eneer Seat �all*See 1a� (Mortar) *See Construction �otes

See 3b

1�238"

Concrete Expansion Joint and Dowel Fastener

Brick Seating �all Side ElevationScale 1" � 1�

Brick Seating �all End ElevationScale 1 " � 1�

Building� Stairs and �all Site SectionScale 1

8" � 1�

Building Stairs and �all Front ElevationScale 1

8" � 1�

Brick Seating �all � Pavement DetailScale 1 " � 1�

Limestone Paving and Expansion JointScale 1 " � 1� L2

2 of 4

Rev

isio

ns�

Dra

wn

B�

� M

ac�

en�

ie P

atric

kD

ecem

ber �

� 2

012

C�

ecke

d B

��

Rev

ised

B�

�R

evis

ion

Dat

e�

Land

scap

e M

ater

ialit

� F

inal

Pro

ject

Bric

k S

eatin

g �

all�

Pav

emen

t Det

ails

Bui

ldin

g� S

tairs

and

Site

Ele

vatio

n

��

e P

enns

�lv

ania

Sta

te �

nive

rsit�

Dep

artm

ent o

f Lan

dsca

pe A

rc�

itect

ure

Col

lege

of A

rts a

nd A

rc�

itect

ure

Fall

2012

� B

aird

� B

urk�

olde

r� �

ew

0 1� 2�6" 0 1� 2�6"

0 1� 2�6"

0 1� 2�6"

0 1�2� 4� 8� 16�

0 1�2� 4� 8� 16�

LANDSCAPEMATERIALITY

Landscape Materiality Studio-Campus Plaza

Wall &

12

mp Landscape Implementation - Lakeview Apartments Construction

(41)

(42)

(47)

(46)

(40)

(41)

(42)

(45)

(48)

(47)

(46)

49 47

46

2.27

%

2.27

%

1.62%

1.88%

1.76%

1.13%

1.50%

1.50%

2.00%

2.00%

1.96%

1.33%

1.50

%

(44)

(45)

(46)

(47)

(48)

(48)

(47)

HP 51.40

FFE 50.50 41.50

FFE 52.3 43.30

FFE 54.20 45.20

FFE 54.10 45.10

FFE 54.20 45.20

FFE 53.00 47.00

FFE 50.60 41.60

TC 51.41BC 50.91

TC 51.26BC 50.76

TC 51.12BC 50.62

TC 50.58BC/DI 50.08

TC 50.72BC 50.22

TC 50.69BC 50.19

TC 50.54BC 50.04

TC 50.30BC 49.80

TC 49.86BC/DI 49.36

TC 50.00BC 49.50

TC 49.97BC 49.47

TC 49.40BC 48.90

TC 51.32BC 50.82

TC 51.52BC 51.02

TC 50.26BC 49.76

TC 50.06BC 49.76

TC 49.30BC/DI 48.80

TC 51.65BC 51.15

TC 51.65BC 51.15

TC 51.25BC 50.75

52

51

50

49

48

47

46

45

TC 51.24BC 50.74

TC 51.32BC 50.82

TC 50.70BC/DI 50.20

TC 50.78BC 50.28

TC 52.18BC 51.68

TC 50.64BC 50.24

TC 50.56BC 50.06

TC 50.02BC/DI 49.52

TC 50.10BC 49.60

TC 49.98BC 48.48

TC 40.70BC 49.20

TC 50.02BC 49.52

TC 50.15BC 49.65

TC 51.35BC 50.85

TC 51.51BC 51.01

TC 51.64BC 51.14

51.74

51.93

49

48

47

46

45

47

46

45

51.8851.64

51.40

52.50

52.20

44.90

45.20

BW 45.20

47.90

50.00

50.36

49.50

51.88

51.96

53.00

BS 52.20

52.50

51.80

54.10

52.51

51.65

50.25

50.25

47.50

44.90

1.50%

2.00%

1.00%

1.50

%2.

00%

2.00% 2.00%45.80

45.75

46.00

44.80

45.10

48

TC 51.47BC 50.97

(52)

(51)

(50)

TC 49.18BC 48.68

TC 48.53BC 48.03

TC 48.53BC 48.03

BC 48.68

49.181.63%

TC 40.70BC 49.20

TC 49.75BC 49.25

TC 49.97BC 49.47

51.57

TC 49.75BC 49.25

49.28

48.99

49.08

48.99

53.00

Porch FFE 51.80 Porch FFE 52.60

1.77%1.12%

44.80

BS 52.10

BS 52.10

1.77%

Porch FFE 50.50

Porch FFE 54.10Porch FFE 54.10

Porch FFE 54.20

Porch FFE 54.20

Porch FFE 50.60

2.00%

2.00%

Patio Patio

2.00

%

2.00

%

BS 51.70

BW/BS 52.20

45 45

5252

(51)

(50)

2.67

%

52.50

4 Stairs @6" Rise x 1' Run

51

50

49

49

51

50

49

2.83

%

2.50%

50

14.3

0%

11.22%

50.15

49.88

2.50%

2.83

%

51.92

51.91

TW 54.00

TS 54.20

TS 54.20

TW 48.00BW 47.25

BW 45.90TW 48.00

44

L A

K

E

R

O

A

D

(43)

(44)

(45)

(46)

(47)

(48)

(48)

(43)

(46)

(48.13)

44

(49)

TC 49.18

TC 49.30BC/DI 48.80

49

48

50

BW 45.00

TW 46.00BW 44.60

TW 47.50

BW 45.20

BW 44.90TW 46.00

BW 45.10

TW 47.50

BW 45.99

TW 46.00

50

BW 48.00TW 48.50

BW 48.50

TW 48.50BW 47.90

5 Stairs @6" Rise x 1' Run

4 Stairs @6" Rise x 1' Run

See Plan Detail 1

See Plan Detail 2

BW 45.10TW 46.00

BW 47.40

51.76

HP 52.56FFE 54.10 45.10 1.13%

FFE 50.5051.30

51.10

50.2550.44 50.51

TW 52.00BW 51.03

50.41

50.33

BC 50.26

51.10

BS 51.30

TS 51.80

50.50

BS/BW 51.3050.50

1.47%

TC 50.76

BC 50.49TC 50.99

Porch FFE 51.80

Porch FFE 50.50

50.45

50.50

50.15

49.88

2.50%

1 Stair @6" Rise x 1' Run

1.96%

FFE 50.60

TC 50.26BC 49.76

51.16

52.50

50.00

50.36

Porch FFE 52.60

50.22

50.32

50.32

50.22

50.12

TC 50.52

50.42

50.60

50.60

TW 53.00BW 50.52

5 Stairs @6" Rise x 1' Run

BC 50.02

BS/BW 50.10

BS 50.10

TS 52.60

TS 52.60 Porch FFE 50.60

2.83

%

2.83

%

BW 52.60

4.00

% 50.40

50.60

BW 50.60TW 53.00

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T

13

mpLandscape Implementation - Gabion Module System

•The modules will be placed on site and may be arranged in a number of different ways (not easily movable once filled with rock).

•The planter modules will provide opportunity for the restaurant and/or community to grow plants in the space

•The plants used otherwise will be low maintenance, hardy and preferably native.This will reduce the maintinence, while still improving the aesthetic and sustainability of the site.

•The modules will create spaces within the vacant lot, which may be attractive to surrounding residents as gathering spaces.

Gabion Module Planting SystemMacKenzie Patrick

VACANT LOT DESIGNPLANTER

14

mp Center for Environmental Conservation - State College, PA

15

mpCenter for Environmental Conservation - State College, PA

Concept: Revealing underlying geology of the site through the flow of nature while subtly recognizing the history of the site through a grid.

•The organic flow of the design represents the underground streams which run through the site due to the karst topographic structure•The paved paths, trails, roads and programs are all organized organically•The trees on site are arranged in a sparse grid. The grid represents the existing hedgerows which show the history of the site as a farm•The existing hedgerows have been preserved and a subtle grid organizes all the trees within the site and prairie

Location: State College, PAYear: Spring 2010 - Design StudioSoftware: Adobe Suite CS4 AutoCAD 2011

CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTALCONSERVATION

16

mp Center for Environmental Conservation - State College, PA

17

mpCenter for Environmental Conservation - State College, PA

18

mp Baltimore Ecological Study Urban Design Project

EducationCommunity

Environment

Resident InvolvmentNPO involvementElderly ResidentsOwnershipResponsibility

Elementary SchoolsBehavior ChangesSoil EducationWater EducationPlant EducationFood Education

Environmental AwarenessCuriosityPsychological BenefitsRecreation Benefits

Environmental AwarenessPride in Neighborhood“Take-home” Values

Chain of InformationSummer ProgramsGenerational Overlaps

Soil QualitySoil DependenceWater QualityHabitat CreationAir Quality

19

mpBaltimore Ecological Study Urban Design Project

Concept:Design phasing will begin at the Baltimore City Public School System, and expand to utilize vacant lots throughout the neighborhood of Oliver. Potentially, the impact of this expansion will overlap many neighborhoods and create a ecological network through the entire city.

Integrating the environment and ecological awareness back into the city could benefit not only the environment, but also the culture and values of the residents. Through education, community involvement, and vacant lots reclamation, this design will bring nature back into the city. The design aims to eliminate the presence of biophobia by utilizing vacant lots as educational spaces in Oliver, a neighborhood of Baltimore.

Location: Baltimore, MDYear: Spring 2012 - Design StudioSoftware: Adobe Suite CS5 AutoCAD 2011 Google Sketchup ArcMap

ECOLOGICAL STUDYBALTIMORE

20

mp Baltimore Ecological Study Urban Design Project

21

mpBaltimore Ecological Study Urban Design Project

22

mp Community Design Studio - State College, PA Group members: Travis D’Onofrio, Lucas Merrill

Process Sketches Drawn By: MacKenzie Patrick

23

mpCommunity Design Studio - State College, PA

CALDER WAY DESIGNDOWNTOWN

24

mp Group members: Brendan August, Lucas MerrillCommunity Design Studio - Lewistown, PA

Process Sketches Drawn By: MacKenzie Patrick

25

mpGroup members: Brendan August, Lucas Merrill Community Design Studio - Lewistown, PA

Illustrative Masterplan Drawn By: MacKenzie Patrick

COMMUNITY DESIGN

JUNIATA

26

mp Lake Erie Harbor Islands Design - Analysis

Utilizing the currents of Lake Erie to collect plastic and build dredge islands, which connect shoreline cities

27

mpLake Erie Harbor Islands Design - Analysis

JAN

MAR

MAY

JUL

SEPT

NOV

Toledo, Ohio

Detroit River

Convergence Zone

lake erie currents http://www.glerl.noaa.gov/res/glcfs/currents/glcfs-currents-avg.htmlNOAA Great Lakes Current Map

JAN

MAR

MAY

JUL

SEPT

NOV

Toledo, Ohio

Detroit River

Convergence Zone

lake erie currents http://www.glerl.noaa.gov/res/glcfs/currents/glcfs-currents-avg.htmlNOAA Great Lakes Current Map

Concept:Recently in national news, it has been reported that there is a large amount of plastic polluting the Great Lakes. The flow of water in the Great Lakes results in a particularly large accumulation of plastic in Lake Erie. This plastic is detrimental to the fish and wildlife, but also to the residents of nearby cities and towns, such as Toledo, OH. It is imperative that mitigation is made to reduce the pollutants coming through the Detroit River. The plastic pollutants should be captured and creatively converted to a usable energy source. Additionally, while protecting the prized walleye of Lake Erie, this new system can create secure habitat for the fish spawning season. As a large system, the islands will serve as a social destination for jogging and biking as a new kind of experience for residents and visitors.

Location: Lake Erie Harborlands Year: Spring 2012 - Design StudioSoftware: Adobe Suite CS5 AutoCAD 2011 Rhino 4.0

HARBORLANDSLAKE ERIE

28

mp Lake Erie Harbor Islands Design - Analysis

29

mpLake Erie Harbor Islands Design - Masterplan

30

mp

•Free access by the Bike Barge •Views of surrounding Lake Erie•Visual connections across the site•Views of activities on site •Plastic collection and conversion •Walleye Habitat•Nodes for relaxation

DETROIT RIVER

LAKE

ERI

ELA

KE E

RIE

TOLEDO

MAUM

MEE RIVER

OTTAWA WILDLIFE REFUGE

MONROE

LAKE

ERI

E IS

LAND

S

PELE

E IS

LAND

Bike Barge

•Free access by the Bike Barge •Views of surrounding Lake Erie•Visual connections across the site•Views of activities on site •Plastic collection and conversion •Walleye Habitat•Nodes for relaxation

DETROIT RIVER

LAKE

ERI

ELA

KE E

RIE

TOLEDO

MAUM

MEE RIVER

OTTAWA WILDLIFE REFUGE

MONROE

LAKE

ERI

E IS

LAND

S

PELE

E IS

LAND

Bike Barge

Lake Erie Harbor Islands Design - Trail System

31

mpLake Erie Harbor Islands Design - Trail System

32

mp Lake Erie Harbor Islands Design - Trail System

33

mp

DETROIT RIVER

LAKE

ERI

ELA

KE E

RIE

TOLEDO

MAUM

MEE RIVER

PLASTIC CONVERSION

PLASTIC COLLECTIONPLASTIC COLLECTION

HABITAT

HABIT

AT

HABITAT

HABITAT

HABITAT

OTTAWA WILDLIFE REFUGE

MO

NROE

LAKE

ERI

E IS

LAND

S

PELE

E IS

LAND

HARBOR ISLANDS

arches on the pedestrian highway create prospect to venture out across the water

viewsheds trails and recommended routes

masterplan

LAKE ERIE

.7

.1

.1

.3

.2

.2

.3

.4

.3 .2

.2

.2

.6 .4

.4

.1

3.1 miles

5k4.7miles ofTRAIL

Scale: 1”= 500’

run

2.8 miles2.6 miles

1.6 miles 1.8 miles1.2 miles

125’

0’ 250’

500’

RED

TRAI

LS >

2 M

ILES

BLUE

TRA

ILS

< 2

MIL

ES

pedestrian path and arches

Lake Erie Harbor Islands Design - Trail System

34

mp Interests - Photography

35

mpInterests - Photography

Undergraduate of Landscape ArchitectureThe Pennsylvania State UniversityE-mail: mqp5082@psu.eduPhone: (443) 553-4427

MacKenzie Patrick