+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Understanding 3D seismic data through figures

Understanding 3D seismic data through figures

Date post: 07-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: shahbaz-gul
View: 224 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 16

Transcript
  • 8/6/2019 Understanding 3D seismic data through figures

    1/16

    Definition of 3D terms

  • 8/6/2019 Understanding 3D seismic data through figures

    2/16

  • 8/6/2019 Understanding 3D seismic data through figures

    3/16

  • 8/6/2019 Understanding 3D seismic data through figures

    4/16

    Cross line Direction:The direction that isorthogonal to receiver lines

    In-line Direction: The Direction that is parallel to

    receiver lines CMP BIN (or BIN)

    All mid-points that lie inside this area, or bin, are

    assumed to belong to the same common

    midpoint. In other words, all traces that lie in thesame bin will be CMP stacked and contribute to

    the fold of that bin.

  • 8/6/2019 Understanding 3D seismic data through figures

    5/16

    Fold

    The number of midpoints that are stacked

    within a CMP bin. Although one usually givesone average fold number for any survey, the fold

    varies from bin to bin and for different offsets.

  • 8/6/2019 Understanding 3D seismic data through figures

    6/16

    Swat

    The term swath, has been used with different

    meanings in the industry. First, and mostcommonly, a swath equals the width of the area

    over which source stations are recorded without

    any cross-line rolls.

  • 8/6/2019 Understanding 3D seismic data through figures

    7/16

    Bin Size

    Bin size can be determined by examining three

    factors:target size, maximum unaliasedfrequency due to dip, and lateral resolution, and

    then picking the smallest value of bin size

    provided by these analyses as the design

    parameter

    .

  • 8/6/2019 Understanding 3D seismic data through figures

    8/16

    Target SizeNormally two to three traces, positioned so they

    pass through a small target, will allow that target to

    be seen in a 3-D image, because this means four to

    nine traces will be related to the target on a time slice

    of the horizon of interest. For example, if the target isa small reef or a narrow channel sand then the bins

    should be small enough to get at least two (preferably

    three) traces across the target. This imaging requirement

    gives a 3-D designer an initial (and generally too

    large) estimate for a bin size, which is

    Bin Size < Target size/3

    .

  • 8/6/2019 Understanding 3D seismic data through figures

    9/16

    Consider the following example where a 3-D survey

    in Alberta crossed a 300-m ( mi) wide channel

    (Cordsen, 1993b), which had been difficult to define

    with 2-D data. Within this narrow channel, a 100-m

    ( mi) wide sand anomaly surrounded by shale could

    be identified on the 3-D data (Figure 2.8). The choice

    of 24 m 24 m (78 ft 78 ft) bin size allowed the

    sand anomaly to be recognized on four traces crossing

    the channel. This 4-trace response is close to the minimumthat is required for target recognition by many

    interpreters. Had the bin size been chosen much

    larger, the sand anomaly may not have shown up at

    all.

  • 8/6/2019 Understanding 3D seismic data through figures

    10/16

    Maximum Unaliased Frequency

    An adequate spatial sampling is necessary for

    dips and frequencies expected, otherwise spatial

    aliasing will occur.

  • 8/6/2019 Understanding 3D seismic data through figures

    11/16

  • 8/6/2019 Understanding 3D seismic data through figures

    12/16

    Referring to Figure

    One needs to take account of the fact that t

    represents only wavelength since two-waytraveltime is measured and two samples

    per wavelength are required to avoid

    aliasing.

  • 8/6/2019 Understanding 3D seismic data through figures

    13/16

  • 8/6/2019 Understanding 3D seismic data through figures

    14/16

  • 8/6/2019 Understanding 3D seismic data through figures

    15/16

    Maximum Unaliased Frequency:Each dipping seismic reflection event has maximum possible unaliased

    frequency f before migration, that depends to velocity to the target,the value of geological dip and bin size B

    B=V/4*f*Sin

    Common practice is to use dominant frequency & average velocity

    Reference (Planning 3D Seismic Surveys)

    Receivers (BIN) should be close (Small) enough to avoidthe possibility of spatial alliasing.

  • 8/6/2019 Understanding 3D seismic data through figures

    16/16

    Calculate the Bin Size for the following

    sets of numbers (Vint=3000 m/s)

    Dip (in degrees) fmax (Hz)B

    (meters)15 100

    25 60

    40 40


Recommended