+ All Categories
Home > Technology > Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

Date post: 13-Jun-2015
Category:
Upload: afcom
View: 1,856 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
The following presentation was given during the Spring 2012 Data Center World conference in Las Vegas, NV by Kirk Killian. Learn more about Data Center World at www.datacenterworld.com.
Popular Tags:
38
This presentation was given during the Spring, 2012 Data Center World Conference and Expo. Contents contained are owned by AFCOM and Data Center World and can only be reused with the express permission of ACOM. Questions or for permission contact: [email protected] . Interested in data center management? Learn about the data center management sessions offered at the upcoming Fall 2012 Data Center World Conference at: www.datacenterworld.com .
Transcript
Page 1: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

This presentation was given during the Spring, 2012 Data Center World Conference and Expo. Contents contained are owned by AFCOM and Data Center World and can only be reused with the express permission of ACOM. Questions or for permission contact: [email protected].

Interested in data center management?

Learn about the data center management sessions offered at the upcoming Fall 2012 Data Center World Conference at:

www.datacenterworld.com.

Page 2: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

2

Understanding & Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

Kirk A. Killian, Executive Vice President214/365-2050 (direct)214/244-1111 (mobile)E-Mail: [email protected]

10000 N. Central Expressway, Suite 1001Dallas, TX 75231

Page 3: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

3

Classifications: Enterprise Colo,Individual Cabinets & Web Hosting

Enterprise Colo: Suites/Cages with some non-shared infrastructure (PDU’s, CRACs, UPS, generators, electrical switchgears, chiller plants) and non-shared telecom circuits

Colo Cabinets/Racks: Lease of one or a group of cabinets or racks with fully shared critical systems infrastructure

Web Hosting: Provider owns servers and all critical systems infrastructures and user uploads applications and data

This presentation focuses on Enterprise Colo.

Page 4: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

4

Key Colo Terminology

Provider – the company operating the colocation facility Pod – a phase or major section of a data center, usually with self-

contained critical systems components Suite – the premises occupied solely by one customer, often with

hard walls and non-shared infrastructure components Cage – same space as “Suite” occupied by an enterprise

customer, but less likely to have dedicated (non-shared) PDUs, CRACs and UPS modules.

Critical Load – the IT equipment load, typically backed up by UPS and generator.

Modular – design with critical systems components manufactured off site and assembled at the data center.

Page 5: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

5

More Colo Terminology

Managed Services – services often provided by a colo company in addition to the basics of space, power and telecom circuits; May include server re-boots, rack and stack, server builds, tape changes, tape shipping/receiving, SAN/NAS usage, firewall, load balancing, and intrusion detection.

Carrier Neutral – colo customer selects whichever 3rd party telecom carriers it chooses to serve its suite.

Home Run Circuit, in telecom, a circuit provided directly by a telecom company to an end-user, usually through or around a colo facility “Meet Me” Room.

Meet Me Room – room within a colo facility where telecom providers install their circuits into the facility, from which user circuits are provisioned to colo customers via cross connects.

Page 6: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

6

History – Colocation’s Early Days

Rapid growth in 1998 – 2000 Mostly TUI Tier 1 & Tier 2 Facilities; A Few Tier 3 Mostly 50-100 watts/SF and 12 – 24” raised floor Large open data halls w/ cages & cabinets for lessees Limited acceptance by traditional corporate IT departments Ready acceptance by internet companies, where speed to

market has been paramount and few internet companies had a deep bench of legacy data center facility expertise.

Industry shakeout in 2001 – 2004 with bankruptcies, consolidations and closures: The “Dot Bomb” era.

Page 7: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

7

Modern Colo:2006 to Present

Steady, strong growth since 2006 Newer facilities with higher reliability - mostly TUI Tier 3 and

“almost Tier 3” infrastructures with substantial concurrent maintainability

Higher densities, mostly 100 – 300 watts/SF; some much higher More experienced providers More sophisticated providers, many with SAS70/SSAE16 audits,

PCI compliance, and professional operations and reporting Financially stronger providers, including publicly-traded choices Cost reductions per kW of Critical Load More dedicated (non-shared) infrastructure than in earlier era

Page 8: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

8

Modern Colo:Dedicated Infrastructure

“Pod” data center deployments with less infrastructure sharing: Key concept for some corporate customers as suites for 300 – 2,000 kW critical loads not likely to share PDUs, CRACs, UPS modules, perhaps even chiller plants, primary switchgears or generators with other customers (“data center within a data center” concept.)

Example: Colo suite provides 400 kW Critical Load to (1) customer. Dual-feed PDUs and CRACs non-shared within suite. N+1 UPS modules (3 x 300 kVa) non-shared serving just this

suite. Primary switchgear, generators, chiller plant shared with (2)

other corporate users in this data center pod.

Page 9: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

9

Modern Colo: GradualCorporate IT Acceptance

Changes in colo industry have resulted in increased corporate acceptance of Enterprise Colo model since 2006.

Example Corporate Commentary:

1999: “I don’t do colo.”

2003: “My company’s not ready for colo yet.”

2007: “I might do colo; but not on this project.”

2010: “How quickly and cheaply can I be live? Mytimeline is short and my CapEx budget was cut.”

Page 10: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

10

Types of Colo Providers

Large National/International Provider Regional Provider Local “Mom and Pop” Provider Wholesale Only

Page 11: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

11

Large National/International Providers

Many data center sites, offering potential for geographic dispersion

Full suite of optional managed services Experienced team with deep bench for problem solving Financial strength, ability to back up SLAs Capital markets access for future infrastructure expansion

funding Less flexible rules & policies than smaller, entrepreneurial

providers Less responsive than smaller, entrepreneurial providers More expensive than other options, some much more

Page 12: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

12

Regional Providers

Many benefits of national/international providers More flexible & responsive than largest providers Less geographic reach than largest providers, but great local

expertise Less financial transparency than largest providers Mix of older legacy facilities and new state-of-the-art data

centers Usually less financial strength than largest providers, but still

stable, dependable entities

Page 13: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

13

Local “Mom and Pop”Providers

Entrepreneurial, nimble, very responsive Passionate about providing great customer service Customer is “Big Fish/Small Pond” Operations team may be inexperienced Shallow labor bench for problem solving Minimal financial strength for expansions or backing up SLAs May have renovated and expanded an older data center on a

shoestring Unlikely to have SAS70 Type II certification, PCI compliance, and

sophisticated operations & maintenance procedures including audit trails

Being purchased and merged into larger companies rapidly Poor corporate acceptance into this segment

Page 14: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

14

Wholesale Providers

Pre-designed “Pods” and critical systems infrastructure, increasingly designed with better power scalability

Lowest cost/kW, but inflexible pricing for growth Limited managed services Longer lease commitments required (6-15 years) Newer facilities (<= 5 years old) with reliable infrastructure May not have SAS70/SSAE16 certification, but very experienced

working with outside auditors in getting one Strong financial condition and financial capacity to construct

expansion space for growth Wholesale providers can build a suite to your specifications, but

this requires design, permitting, construction & commissioning, typically requiring 5-8 months.

Page 15: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

15

Colo Trend #1:Higher Electrical Densities

New colo facilities have electrical densities of 100 – 300 watts/SF.

Some new colo facilities have initial electrical densities of 100-175 watts/SF, but are designed for future increases to 200-300 watts/SF.

Some facilities claim ability to cool 1,500 watts/SF, using full hot or cold aisle containment, ultra-sophisticated and expensive multi-path cooling systems, with 300 watts/SF becoming readily attainable w/o containment systems.

Page 16: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

16

Colo Trend #2:Modular Designs

Several colo providers are offering modular designs, where they offer “data center in a box” solutions, allowing the customer to custom design and implement new data center pods as needed.

Shipping containers with cabinets, “power packs” and cooling. Offers advantage of paying for some capacity only when needed,

saving both CapEx and OpEx. Offers perceived advantage of less critical systems sharing.

Page 17: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

17

Colo Trend #3:Cloud Services

Colo providers are offering an ever wider array of optional “cloud” services, including SAN/NAS, “burst capacity” servers, network services, security services, applications management, etc.

Optional managed services allow the small user to elevate their game without ramping up staff.

Many services offered 100% ala carte, separate from other colo contract requirements, valuable as the customer gets to know the provider better over time.

Page 18: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

18

Example Enterprise Colo Pricing Models

Most common pricing models are:

A. Cost/kW of Capacity + Metered Power

B. Cost/SF + Electrical Circuits

Page 19: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

19

A. $/kW of Capacity + Metered Power

This pricing model includes: 1) monthly cost/kW of installed capacity (not actual usage) 2) metered power, plus 3) 20-70% uplift on metered power for HVAC & common area

electricity loads

Customer pays a one-time charge (“NRC”) for electrical circuit installation, usually without provider markup (negotiable)

If you use significantly less power than your required capacity you’re overpaying for the provider’s infrastructure

Very efficient if you can predict actual usage accurately Great pricing model if provider can add critical systems

components over your contract term to increase your capacity as needed.

Some providers charging on actual usage instead of capacity.

Page 20: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

20

B. $/SF +Electrical Circuit Charges

This pricing model includes: 1) monthly cost/SF for your suite space, plus 2) monthly charge for specific electrical circuits installed; actual

electricity usage is usually included in the circuit charge

Individual electrical circuits are expensive but “pay as you go”, so you can have them installed as needed, provided you’ve reserved the capacity from your provider.

Can be cost effective if growth is non-linear and unpredictable. Be sure to reserve growth capacity, or provider will sell your

future growth power/cooling to other customers – ouch! Reserve “B” – backup circuits (for dual corded servers) often

priced at 50% of “A” - active circuits.

Page 21: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

21

Is Enterprise ColoRight For You?

Good Fit: Low Capital Expenditure Budget Immediate Need Short-Term Need Physical Need for IT Equipment in a Non-Core Geography 3rd Party Managed Services Need Power/Space Quantities Well Defined for 3-5 Years Huge Carrier Diversity Needed

Poor Fit: Lowest Long-Term Occupancy Costs Required Maximum Flexibility Required in Changing Critical Systems

Infrastructure Maximum Control Over Critical Systems Operations Required

Page 22: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

22

The Baker’s Dozen: Tips forEvaluating & Selecting a Colo Provider

(13) Recommendations in colo evaluation and selection

Page 23: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

23

1. Carefully Define YourProvider/Facility Criteria

Carefully define your colo criteria at the project outset: Geography Systemic Redundancy/Reliability Minimum Space Required Power Requirements By Year (Define Early in Project!) Growth in Power (tough to estimate accurately – see next slide) Telecom Facility Hazard/Risk Tolerance Desired Managed Services Required Financial Strength/History of Provider Project Timing Project Budget

Page 24: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

24

2. Estimate Growth in Power & Cooling

Define anticipated power needs by year (not easy; especially after year 3)

Verify each provider’s systemic ability to provide additional power/cooling, including physical placement of additional infrastructure.

If growth is sought in power, verify the provider’s ability to remove the additional heat (It’s generally easier to increase power than cooling.)

Get a mechanical engineer’s opinion of future cooling design if you’re doubtful (i.e. 200 watts/SF using 12” raised floor).

Ask about highest density area in facility and talk to that customer about hotspots & provider responsiveness.

Request a CFD analysis to prove cooling capabilities.

Structuring the colo contract to accommodate uncertain growth but not overpay for that growth is the key challenge.

Page 25: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

25

3. Seek Carrier Neutrality

“Carrier Neutrality” means the colo provider lets you select your telecom providers without provider surcharges, offering:

More lit carriers (typically) Lower pricing by encouraging competitive pricing among carriers Higher likelihood of getting truly redundant fiber networks A dark fiber option, which is great if you are operating

active/active mirrored or DR data centers.

Page 26: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

26

4. Prepare RFP to GetCompetitive Proposals

Prepare Requests For Proposal to get competitive proposals. Send RFPs to 4-8 wisely selected providers; research candidates

best suited to meet your needs and be respectful of providers’ proposal prep time.

Be realistic about quantity of information sought in proposals. RFPs encourage providers to submit competitive proposals. RFP should clearly communicate your project needs,

expectations and timing. An outside advisor/consultant can assist with the RFP process if

you’re not experienced in colo RFPs.

Page 27: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

27

5. Analyze Proposals and Negotiate Contract Terms

Input your space/power growth needs into each provider’s pricing model.

Compare proposals under multiple growth scenarios (anticipated, high-growth, low-growth, etc.).

Pricing comparison will help match provider’s infrastructure scalability against your growth needs.

Seek line item pricing, and compare pricing elements across providers.

Many elements of provider proposals are negotiable. Include telecom costs in pricing comparison; may vary among

providers, especially if they have discount carrier options.

8-40% savings are typical from well-written & strategically executed RFP and proposal negotiation process.

Page 28: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

28

6. Evaluate Providers’Financial Strength

Some providers are publicly-traded; some have S&P/Moody’s credit ratings.

Get audited financial statements (after executing Non-Disclosure Agreement).

Get financing reference if future construction is required. Get assistance from your CFO’s office if available. Bankruptcy or closure of a colo provider you’re under contract

with can be disastrous, so do your homework. This is very rare!

Page 29: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

29

7. Get Customer References

For your colo provider finalists, get customer references, not just from the providers’ 1-2 favorite customers (the easy ones), but from their 3 largest and a few smaller ones. (Not always easy to identify and interview.)

Ask references not only about the provider’s actual performance and uptime, but also their responsiveness to that customer’s evolving needs.

Ask the customer if they would structure their colo contract differently if they could repeat the process and why.

Page 30: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

30

8. Set Realistic Uptime Expectations

Be realistic in uptime expectations: compare uptime targets against basic systemic redundancies.

Compare SLA terms early in your proposal review. SLA credits are usually weak compared with customers’ costs. Providers work very hard to protect their uptime reputations. Uptime is generally very good for newer facilities with well

executed maintenance and operations processes. Biggest downtime problems are in older facilities that have been

inexpensively and quickly expanded and poorly maintained. Many providers exaggerate TUI tier ratings; very few are Tier 4.

Page 31: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

31

9. Select Provider With AGreat Cultural Match

Interview provider’s key personnel – match interviews with your team SME’s.

Is the provider’s team and corporate culture going to work well with yours?

This is a long-term “going steady” relationship – not a prom date.

Strive for Win/Win deal terms; Punitive Win/Lose economic negotiation is usually a bad bargain.

A great relationship is most important when extensive managed services or a flexible growth model is required.

Page 32: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

32

10. Form Multi-Disciplined Colo Selection Team

Enlist SMEs from your organization: Hardware, Applications, Electrical, Cooling, Facilities, Telecom, Security, Business Continuity, Financial and Legal

Designate a project coordinator. Engage an outside advisor if your coordinator hasn’t evaluated

colo before or is too busy. Outside advisors are generally much less expensive than the

time and money savings they provide.

Page 33: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

33

11. Get ContractOptions

Seek flexibility through reasonable options in colo contracts:

Power/cooling growth option is very important. Contraction Right should be reasonable (advance notice, return

highly re-leasable subset of cage, pay subdivision costs, etc.). Early Termination Right should be reasonable (advance notice,

limited termination windows). Termination Option for Poor Performance should be verifiable. Get a Renewal Option at fixed rates, not “market” rates,

including modest increases over original pricing. Seek a one-year Extension Option in addition to other renewal

option term. Ability to add managed services at pre-determined prices.

Contract options are one-sided to customer’s benefit: get them!

Page 34: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

34

12. Study Future or In-Progress Construction

Scrutinize critical dates on provider’s construction schedule. Verify funding sources for future or in-progress construction. 95% of project steps may occur on time but the other 5% can

put construction project weeks/months behind schedule. Assume projects not already underway will not deliver as

originally promised. Some providers have promoted “vaporware” growth plans. Allow one month for new data center commissioning. Decide if you’re comfortable being the first customer in a new

data center, especially regarding telecom circuits.

Page 35: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

35

13. Allow Adequate Project Timeline

Reasonable colo selection project timeline includes: 1 month – Establish needs 1 month – Research prospective providers 1 month – Write Request For Proposal 1 month – Get proposals & evaluate 1 month – Negotiate terms & select preferred provider(s) 1 month – Negotiate/execute contract 0-6 Months – provider builds colo suite/cage= 6 – 12 Months for most organizations

Several steps can be completed simultaneously. Process can be accelerated under certain circumstances.

Page 36: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

36

Conclusion

Enterprise colo can be a great solution for the corporate data center user under certain circumstances.

Colo facilities and providers are not “One Size Fits All”, so evaluate and select wisely.

Carefully selecting and negotiating with providers can yield significant savings and a contract with flexibility tailored to your specific needs.

Page 37: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

37

Evaluating a Colocation Data Center

Call or E-Mail With Any Follow-Up Questions:

Kirk A. Killian, Executive Vice President214/365-2050 (direct)214/244-1111 (mobile)E-Mail: [email protected]

10000 N. Central Expressway, Suite 1001Dallas, TX 75231

Page 38: Understanding And Evaluating Colocation Data Centers

This presentation was given during the Spring, 2012 Data Center World Conference and Expo. Contents contained are owned by AFCOM and Data Center World and can only be reused with the express permission of ACOM. Questions or for permission contact: [email protected].

Interested in data center management?

Learn about the data center management sessions offered at the upcoming Fall 2012 Data Center World Conference at:

www.datacenterworld.com.


Recommended