+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Understanding animal welfare part2 jw

Understanding animal welfare part2 jw

Date post: 08-May-2015
Category:
Upload: jw-schroeder
View: 149 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Discussion on public perception and critical issues facing domestic farm animal owners. Opportunities for communicating animal stewardhsip.
6
JW Schroeder, Ph.D. Department of Animal Sciences March 30, 2011 NDSU 2011 Extension Spring Conference, Fargo 1 Department of Animal Sciences HOW TO LOSE AN ARGUMENT ON ANIMAL WELFARE J.W. Schroeder, Ph.D., Associate Professor Extension Dairy Specialist “Public sentiment is everything. With public sentiment nothing can fail; without it, nothing can succeed.” – Abe Lincoln 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 1% 2% 3% 3% 8% 7% 10% 13% 14% 13% 43% 40% 5% 20% 17% 1 Very Unfavorable 10 Very Favorable Feelings Toward Dairy Products Midwest Dairy Association Cheese N=261 Milk n=245 1 Very Unfavorable 10 Very Favorable 8.6 Mean On a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 is very unfavorable and 10 is very favorable, how would you characterize your feelings towards milk (1/2 sample) cheese (1/2 sample)? 8.2 Mean Days/Year Consume Cheese 42 78 215 Days/Year Milk Consumed as Beverage 1 70 293 Trusted Sources – Animal Care 65% 47% 44% 17% 13% 7% 20% 18% 13% 10% 9% 8% 10% 35% 16% 9% 5% 10% 11% 8% 21% 31% 31% 27% 43% 48% 36% 33% 36% 37% 6% 13% 14% 22% 29% 36% 39% 40% 41% 45% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% US Department of Agriculture (USDA) American Association of Bovine Practitioners Dairy Research Institute National Milk Producers Federation American Veterinary Medical Association People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA Humane Society of the United States American Humane Society Top Box Index vs. Nat 105 95 116 105 125 116 110 140 130 100 Don’t’ Know No Trust Trust Somewhat Trust very Much Source: Dairy Management Inc. U.S. Welfare Laws Since 2002 Practices Banned in Recent Time Veal crates Arizona 2006, Colorado 2008 Tail Docking of Dairy Cattle Outlawed in California 2009 Foie gras (force feeding) California 2004 “Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act” (Proposition 2, California 2008) Passed by wide margin (63% yes vs. 36% no) Provisions of the Act Animals must have sufficient space to lie down, turn around, groom, stretch limbs freely Most recently, Maine As of January 1, 2011, gestation stalls and veal crates will be prohibited
Transcript

JW Schroeder, Ph.D. Department of Animal Sciences March 30, 2011

NDSU 2011 Extension Spring Conference, Fargo 1

Department of Animal Sciences

HOW TO LOSE AN ARGUMENT ON ANIMAL WELFARE

J.W. Schroeder, Ph.D., Associate Professor

Extension Dairy Specialist

“Public sentiment is everything.

With public sentiment nothing can fail; without it,

nothing can succeed.”

– Abe Lincoln

1% 0%0%2%

0% 1%2%3%3%

8%7%

10%

13%14%

13%

43%40%

5%

20%17%

1Very

Unfavorable

10Very

Favorable

Feelings Toward Dairy ProductsMidwest Dairy Association

CheeseN=261

Milkn=245

1Very

Unfavorable

10Very

Favorable8.6Mean

On a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 is very unfavorable and 10 is very favorable, how would you characterize your feelings towards milk (1/2 sample) cheese (1/2 sample)?

8.2Mean

Days/Year ConsumeCheese

42 78 215Days/Year

Milk Consumed

as Beverage

1 70 293

Trusted Sources – Animal Care

65%

47%

44%

17%

13%

7%

20%

18%

13%

10%

9%

8%

10%

35%

16%

9%

5%

10%

11%

8%

21%

31%

31%

27%

43%

48%

36%

33%

36%

37%

6%

13%

14%

22%

29%

36%

39%

40%

41%

45%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

US Department of Agriculture (USDA)

American Association ofBovine Practitioners

Dairy Research Institute

National Milk Producers Federation

American Veterinary Medical Association

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)

American Society for the Prevention

of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA)

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA

Humane Society of the United States

American Humane Society

Top

Box

In

dex

vs. N

at

105

95

116

105

125

116

110

140

130

100

Don’t’ Know No Trust Trust Somewhat Trust very Much

Source: Dairy Management Inc.

U.S. Welfare Laws Since 2002Practices Banned in Recent Time

– Veal crates• Arizona 2006, Colorado 2008

– Tail Docking of Dairy Cattle• Outlawed in California 2009

– Foie gras (force feeding)• California 2004

“Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act”(Proposition 2, California 2008)– Passed by wide margin (63% yes vs. 36%

no)

• Provisions of the ActAnimals must have sufficient space to lie down, turn around, groom, stretch limbs freely

Most recently, Maine– As of January 1, 2011, gestation stalls

and veal crates will be prohibited

JW Schroeder, Ph.D. Department of Animal Sciences March 30, 2011

NDSU 2011 Extension Spring Conference, Fargo 2

Abuse Captured on Video

1. Westland Hallmark Packing Plant in California (2/08)2. Livestock Market in Portales, New Mexico (6/08)3. The Veal Calf Slaughter Plant in Vermont (11/09)4. Conklin’s Dairy Farm Video of Abuse (5/10)

Social Media Response

Dynamics of cell phone users:

33% access daily news feeds

28% customize internet access

37% contribute to creation of news24 hour news delivery -- now in 30 minute of less!

Communication Tools & Resources

Media efforts to:

• Establish a presence

• Enlist advocates

• Dominate search engines… – Sayable

– Sharable

– Sendable

– Showable

Commodity Groups at Workusdairy.com mydairytoolkit.com

New Consumer-Tested Key Messages Coming this Spring www.midwestdairycheckoff.com

JW Schroeder, Ph.D. Department of Animal Sciences March 30, 2011

NDSU 2011 Extension Spring Conference, Fargo 3

Images of our Industry

Poultry• Leg deformity –

fast growth

Pigs• Lean line

Beef cattle• Corkscrew claw

Dairy• Inherited autosomal

recessives:– DUMPS, BLAD

Images of our Industry

Horses• Blue-eyed

Pets• Dogs – for show not

function

Images of our Industry

Livestock for Exhibition

Viewed as abuses (often a consequence of ignorance about animal needs)

– Feeding diets with excessive concentrates and limited or no hay

– Confined in a small pen that restricts exercise and prevents socialization

– Isolation a dark climate-controlled room for 24 hours a day for the purposes of simply growing hair

– Not understanding what they are seeing and assuming the worse…

Grand Champion Bull – Shearer Angus

Handling Practices to ConsiderThis is a form of animal abuse that is commonplace because of a lack of understanding of these handling devices

Nose-lead is a distraction device, not a halter

Halter is a restraint device

Farm size, in & of itself, will never be a reliable indicator of animal welfare on the farm.

JW Schroeder, Ph.D. Department of Animal Sciences March 30, 2011

NDSU 2011 Extension Spring Conference, Fargo 4

Rodeo EventsSteer wrestling

Calf roping

Team roping

Bull ridingBronc riding

Miscellaneous

Mishaps

Specialty events

Hunting, Fishing, etc.

Sources: DA Daley, CSU-Chico and JK Shearer, ISU

1. Assuming science will give us all the answers Science doesn’t solve ethical questions The public doesn’t always trust scientists

2. Using economics as the justification for all of our practices“...of course we treat them well or we won’t make money”

Although it makes sense to those who raise animals for a living, these statements hurt our efforts with the public

Science & Economics

3. Assuming that you must defend all farming practices, regardless of what they are Defending all practices makes no sense and

causes you to lose credibility with the public

4. Assuming we can’t do better at animal welfare• Agriculture is about evolving practices• Why can’t we continue to improve a system that

is already good, but will continue to change?

Egos and Assumptions

5. Attacking everyone who disagrees with you in a negative and critical manner• Getting angry easily generally means we aren’t

comfortable with what we are doing and have to loudly defend ourselves for assurance

6. Not being willing to listen because we are so busy responding• Learn to listen to understand - not to responding

Talking vs. Listening

JW Schroeder, Ph.D. Department of Animal Sciences March 30, 2011

NDSU 2011 Extension Spring Conference, Fargo 5

7. Assuming that the radical fringe is the general public• We spend far too much time focused on the

animal extremists, and not enough time working with the general public

8. Being reactive rather than proactive• Happens all the time, especially among those

who are passionate about what they do

Radical or Accepted?

9. Assuming that because someone disagrees with you they are stupid, evil or both• Good people can look at the same issue

differently

10.Not working hard enough to build coalitions that include the public (consumers)• Most of our coalition efforts are focused on

bringing agricultural groups together

• There aren’t enough of us, and we don’t represent enough votes.

Thoughtful Planning?

11.Criticizing or mocking any animal production system that is not “conventional”• There is room for different methods of production• Let the market determine their success rather

than you hoping for them to fail

12.Trying to lead a parade without seeing if anyone is following… Have you asked producers about the issue?• 90%+ of surveyed producers say “animals have the RIGHT to be

treated humanely and ethically”!

Diverse Leadership Animal Welfare Gone Hollywood

Temple Grandin• Movie received seven Emmy awards • Named on of Time magazine’s

“100 most influential people in the world”

Warning …

The following contains scenes that some might find disturbing.

Intended for mature audiences that are well-informed and willing to work toward solutions that benefit our society.

These are extreme cases and NOT typical, but they do happen…

Bull fighting, Dog fighting, Cock fighting

JW Schroeder, Ph.D. Department of Animal Sciences March 30, 2011

NDSU 2011 Extension Spring Conference, Fargo 6

Uncontrollable

Neglect

Abuse

Make Every Conversation Count

Key Message

Proof Points

Tell ’em what you told ‘em

Give them a “glass” of information, not the entire tank load


Recommended