Date post: | 22-Jan-2018 |
Category: |
Healthcare |
Upload: | completerx |
View: | 239 times |
Download: | 2 times |
Understanding the ABCs of an ASPJulie Rubin, Pharm.D., BCPS – CompleteRx Director of Clinical Services
Paul Green, Pharm.D., MHA, BCPS – CompleteRx Clinical Pharmacy Manager
May 24, 2017
CompleteRx Webinar Series
CE Credit: ACPE # 0523-0000-17-004-L01-P
Speakers
2
Julie Rubin, Pharm.D., BCPSDirector of Clinical ServicesCompleteRx, Ltd
Paul Green, Pharm.D., MHA, BCPSClinical Pharmacy ManagerCompleteRx, Ltd
3
• Recognize the relationship between antimicrobial
resistance on clinical and economic outcomes in various patient populations
• Outline core elements required by TJC in establishing
and influencing the role of ASPs
• Describe the various metrics used to measure antimicrobial utilization
• Recommend clinical interventions for ASPs that can be implemented in various pharmacy practice models
3
Learning Objectives
4
Disclosure
We wish to disclose that we are employees of
CompleteRx, Ltd. This presentation reflects experience
with the topics at hand. All faculty and planners report
no financial relationships relevant to this activity.
What is Antimicrobial Stewardship?
6
What is Antimicrobial Stewardship?
• Coordinated interventions designed to improve and
measure the appropriate use of antimicrobials
(antibiotics, antivirals, & antifungals)
• Promote the selection of the optimal antimicrobial
• Only use antimicrobial when absolutely needed
• Use the lowest dose via the simplest route for the
shortest duration that will be clinical effective
7
What is the primary goal for
implementing an ASP?
A. Save Money
B. Reduce length of stay
C. Improve patient outcomes
D. Meet accreditation standards
7
Quick Poll
8
Goals of Antimicrobial Stewardship
Primary Goals:
Optimize clinical outcomes
Minimize unintended consequences of antimicrobials
– C. diff., Resistance, Adverse reactions, etc.
Secondary Goal:
Reduce healthcare costs without adversely impacting quality of care
1
2
9
Hot TopicRecommendations from numerous national societies and agencies
Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
World Health Organization (WHO)
Society of Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA)
Pediatric Infectious Disease Society (PIDS)
The Joint Commission (TJC)
Hospital Association of New York State (HANYS)
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
The White House
Why do we need an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP)?
11
New FDA-Approved Antibiotics
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1983-1987 1988-1992 1993-1997 1998-2002 2003-2007 2008-2012
12
Antimicrobial Resistance Trends
13
Why do we need an ASP?
14
Gram Positive Resistance
15
Gram Negative Resistance
16
Why do we need an ASP?
>50% 50%
~$20B
Of all inpatients receive an antibiotic
Of antibiotics prescribed are unnecessary or
inappropriate
Excess healthcare cost of antibiotic
resistance in US
National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria (CARB)
17
Goals: Reduce inappropriate antibiotic use by 50% in outpatient settings and 20% in inpatient settings
18
Why do we need an ASP?
• The CDC has called for all U.S. hospitals to have an ASP by the
year 2020
• As of January 1, 2017, Joint Commission (TJC) requires that
all hospitals seeking accreditation have an active ASP
• CMS is also tracking ASP actions with plans to tie real money
to ASP-related items in the near future
Elements of the ASP Team
21
Who’s on an ASP Committee?
ASP
Providers
Nursing
Executive Leadership
IT
Respiratory Therapy
Lab
Clinical Education
Infection Prevention
Quality
Pharmacy
Core Elements for ASPs
1. Leadership commitment from administration
2. Educating providers on use and resistance
3. Antibiotic use tracking
4. Regular reporting on antibiotic use and
resistance
5. Specific improvement interventions
23
Leadership Commitment
• Formal expression of support for the
stewardship program from the facility
administration.
• Leadership must ensure that staff have
necessary time, education/competencies and
resources to implement the stewardship
program.
24
Program Leadership
• Designated leader
• Physicians have proven very effective in this
role.
Prescribing is a medical staff function
Often an ID physician, but others have filled this role, especially in hospitals with no ID physicians.
• Leadership by committee is not as effective
25
Pharmacy Leadership
• Pharmacy leadership is consistently identified as a
MUST for stewardship in hospitals.
• Pharmacists often play a lead role in implementing
improvement interventions and monitoring antibiotic
use - should have training in infectious diseases.
(e.g., MAD-ID)
• Many programs are co-led by a physician and
pharmacist.
26
All of the following are
part of the core elements
of ASP except:
A. Leadership commitment
B. Led by Pharmacy
C. Educate on resistance and stewardship
D. Antibiotic use tracking
26
Quick Poll
27
Education and Training
Core Competencies
• Antibiotic stewardship-
the basics
• IV to PO Conversion
• Renal Dosing
• Pharmacokinetics
Advanced Training Courses
• Antimicrobial streamlining
• Developing an antibiogram
• Empiric guidelines
Actionable Interventions
29
Antimicrobial Stewardship Framework
Antimicrobial Formulary RestrictionOrder Sets
Prospective Audit with FeedbackIV to PO ConversionDose Optimization
Audits & ReportsEducationGuidelines
De-escalation/StreamliningDuration of Therapy
AC
TIV
EPA
SSIV
E
BEFORE Rx AFTER Rx
PrescriberAntibiotic
RxPatient
Adapted from Moehring RW et al. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2012; 14(6): 592 – 600.
30
Elements for Consideration and Prioritization
• Parenteral to oral conversion (A-I)
• When the patient’s condition allows• Decrease length of stay
• Decrease healthcare costs
• Development of clinical criteria and guidelines allowing conversion to use of oral agents (A-III)
31
Elements for Consideration and Prioritization
• Streamlining or de-escalation therapy (A-II) Based on culture results and elimination of redundant
therapy
Decreases antimicrobial exposure and cost
• Dose optimization (A-II) Based on PK/PD parameters and includes patient
characteristics, causative organism, site of infection, in addition to PK/PD characteristics of the drug
32
Advantages of de-escalation
of antimicrobial therapy include:
A. Decreases inappropriate use of antimicrobials
B. Narrows antimicrobial therapy when appropriate
C. Reduces adverse events
D. Allows initial use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials
E. All of the above
32
Quick Poll
33
Microbiology Stewardship
• Obtain Cultures Prior to Starting Antibiotics!
• Develop a process to ensure cultures are properly and
consistently ordered
• Develop a process to ensure cultures are properly and
consistently obtained
• Develop processes to ensure cultures are properly and
promptly transported and processed
• Develop standards for and assess reliability of processes
for ordering and obtaining a culture
34
Elements for Consideration and Prioritization
• Educational programs, active intervention (A-III, B-II)
Provides foundation of knowledge
• Guidelines and clinical pathways – seek multi-
disciplinary involvement and approval (A-I) Incorporate local antimicrobial resistance patterns (A-I)
Provide education and feedback to practitioners (A-III)
35
Elements for Consideration and Prioritization
• Antimicrobial order forms (B-II)
Shown to be effective component of the program and can facilitate implementation into practice
• Combination therapy
Insufficient data for routine use (C-II)
Has a role to increase coverage in empiric therapy in patients at risk for multi-drug resistant pathogens
• Antimicrobial cycling – is not recommended because of
insufficient data (no ranking)
36
Antibiotic Time OutTrigger tool to stop and reassess antibiotic therapy
Targeted at all providers for Med/Surg patients
• Diagnosis: Does the patient have a bacterial diagnosis that requires antibiotics?
• Drug: Do I have the right drug and dose? (Covering the bug? Can I change to PO/narrower spectrum?)
• Duration: How long do the guidelines recommend treating?
• Documentation: Have I documented my plan clearly?
37
Steps in an antibiotic time out include:
A. Re-evaluating patients who received antibiotics for over 48 hrs
B. Continuing therapy for over 72 hrs if not consistent with
infection
C. Not including stop dates in MR for patients on therapy over 72
hrs
D. De-escalating therapy based on culture results for patients on
antibiotics more than 72 hrs
37
Quick Poll
Tracking & Reporting
Measurement
Clinical
• Length of stay
• Clinical cure/failure rates
• Readmission rates (30 days)
• Resistance rates
• Infection-related mortality
• C. Difficile infections
Process
• Dose optimization
• Adherence to hospital specific guidelines
• Appropriate de-escalation/streamlining
• Appropriateness of therapy
• Cultures before antibiotics
Humanistic
• Adverse drug events avoided
• Time to receipt of appropriate antimicrobials
• Duration of antimicrobial therapy
• IV/PO conversion rates
• Outpatient intravenous therapy rates
Economic
• Antimicrobial utilization (DDD or DOT)
• Hospital wide antimicrobial expenditures
• Relative consumption
• Rate of intravenous antimicrobial use
• Nonformulary agents avoided
Outcomes
DDD=Defined daily doseDOT=Days of therapy
40
Utilization - DOT and CostPatient Days of Therapy
• 1 DOT is the administration of at least one dose of a single
agent on a given day
• 1 DOT represents the administration of a single agent on a
given day regardless of the number of doses or strength
• Can be used in pediatrics
• Insensitive to renal function and dosage; simply one day of
exposure
• Can be adjusted to hospital census
Example: Vancomycin 1 gram every 12 hours x 5 days = 5 DOT
A Story of Success
42
ASP Implementation
Spring 2015
July 2015
Aug. 2015
Sept. 2015
Planning begins
P&T approves
system-wide ASP sub-
committee
1st formal ASP
committee meeting
Began C. diff. Process
Improvement Plan
Hospital-Onset C. diff. Rate
8.1
10.9
13.8
10.2
13.1 13.8
7.6
10.7
2.3
6.4
19.4
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr
2013 2014 2015
HO
CD
I / 1
0,0
00
Pt
Day
s
11.2 HO CDI / 10,000 Pt Days = NHNS Benchmark
44
Hospital-Onset C. diff. Rate
Process for Improvement• Approval of system-wide CPOE order set
• Restriction of oral vancomycin
• Automatic therapeutic interchange
• Encourage antimicrobial streamlining
• Education in various forms to all involved parties
45
Hospital-Onset C. diff. Rate
Clinical Definition Supportive Clinical Data Recommended Treatment
Initial Episode, Mild / Moderate
WBC ≤ 15 x 103 μLAND
SCr < 1.5 x premorbid levelMetronidazole 500 mg PO TID x 10 days
Initial Episode, Severe
WBC > 15 x 103 μLOR
SCr > 1.5 x premorbid levelVancomycin 125 mg PO QID x 10 days
Initial Episode,Severe / Complicated
Meets criteria for severe initial episodeAND
Hypotension / shock, ileus, or megacolon
Metronidazole 500 mg IV TIDPLUS
Vancomycin 500 mg PO QIDx 10 days
(If ileus, may consider PR vancomycin)
1st Recurrence - Same as Initial Episode
> 1st Recurrence -
Vancomycin 125 mg PO QID x 14 daysTHEN
“Taper & Pulse” with Vancomycin 125 mg PO BID x 7 days
FOLLOWED BYVancomycin 125 mg QOD x 6 weeks
46
Hospital-Onset C. diff. Rate
7.2
8.6
6.3
4
5.1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr
HO
CD
I / 1
0,0
00
Pt
Day
s
2015 2016
11.2 HO CDI / 10,000 Pt Days = NHNS Benchmark
Key Takeaways
48
Key Takeaways
• CMS and TJC are developing guidance for
accreditation related to demonstrating an effective ASP, including developing publicly reportable measures
• Antimicrobial resistance is an urgent public health and patient safety concern
• Know your local epidemiology
• All stakeholders need to be engaged across the continuum of care, including consumers
CMS=Centers for Medicare and Medicaid ServicesTJC=The Joint Commission
Questions?
www.completerx.com
Find us on LinkedIn, Facebook and Twitter
@CompleteRx