+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Unit III(1)

Unit III(1)

Date post: 03-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: umesh122
View: 223 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 65

Transcript
  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    1/65

    Prof. Shailja Bhakar

    Unit 3: Decisions in Marketing Stra

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    2/65

    Prof. Shailja Bhakar

    Unit 3 Part A: Corporate Objectives an

    Growth

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    3/65

    Corporate Objectives and Growth St

    Formal objective provide decision criteria th

    organizations business units and employespecific dimensions and levels of performan

    Objectives also provide the benchmarks fothe subsequent outcomes

    Each objective should contain four compone

    1. A performance dimension or attribute soug

    2. A measure or index for evaluating progress

    3. A target or hurdle level to be achieved

    4. A time frame within which the target is to b

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    4/65

    Enhancing Shareholder Value: The UltimaObjective

    For Increasing shareholders value Management musinterest of various corporate constituencies such as:

    1. Employees: Competitive wages2. Customers: High Quality and Competitive Price

    3. Suppliers/Debt holders: Financial Claims that must becash when they fall due

    4. Stock holders: Look for cash dividends and the pros

    dividends reflected in stocks market price Shareholders value can be stated in terms of tar

    shareholder equity, increase in the stock price or earnRecently such objectives are stated in terms of EVA or

    MVA= (Debt + Market Value)- Capital invested in the com

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    5/65

    Enhancing Shareholder Value: The UltiObjective

    Disadvantages of these kind of objectives are:

    1. Do not always provide guidance for a firmmanagers or benchmarks for evaluating performan

    2. Standard Accounting measures such as earning return on investment can not be always linked tofirms share

    3. Finally there is a danger that a narrow focus financial, shareholder objectives may lead managattention to actions necessary to provide valuecustomers and sustain a competitive advantage

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    6/65

    Multiple ObjectivesCorporate generally have multiple objectives such as:

    1. Growth (sales $, market share %)

    2. Competitive strength (brand awareness, market share)

    3. Innovation (New product sales results, new process savings

    4. Profitability (ROI (return on investment), RONA (return on ne(return on equity))

    5. Resource utility (return on capital equipment or fixed assets)

    6. Shareholder returns (returns paid to owners, earnings per sh

    (price to earnings))7. Contribution to customers (competitiveness, product quality

    proposition, customer loyalty)

    8. Contribution to employees (salaries paid, personnel developrates)

    9. Contribution to society (Charitable or social and environmen

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    7/65

    Corporate Development Strategies

    Expansion

    1. Market Penetration2. Product Development

    3. Market Development

    Diversification

    1. Vertical Integration: Forward and Backward

    2. Related Diversification3. Unrelated Diversification

    4. Diversification Through organizational relationship

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    8/65

    Corporate Development Strategies

    Current Products New Produc

    CurrentMarkets

    Market PenetrationStrategies:Increase Market ShareIncrease Product Usage1. Increase Frequency of

    Use2. Increase Quantity3. New Application

    Product Development StrategiesProduct ImprovementsProduct Line ExtensionNew Products for Same Market

    NewMarkets

    Market DevelopmentStrategiesExpand Market for ExistingProduct1. Geographic Expansion2. Target New Segment

    Diversification StrategiesVertical Integration1. Forward Integration2. Backward IntegrationDiversification into related businessDiversification)Diversification into unrelated busine

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    9/65

    Allocating Corporate Resources

    Stars Question C

    Cash Cows

    High

    Lo

    w

    MarketGrowth

    Rate

    Competitive Position (Ratios of Share to Share of Large

    10 High 1.0

    0.1

    Fig 3.1:BostonConsultingGroups

    (BCG)Growth

    Sh M t i

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    10/65

    Resource Allocation and Strategy Imp

    Question Marks: Low market share and high growth ind

    large amount of cash not only for expansion to keep

    growing market but also for marketing activities. To i

    share and catch industry leader. The strategic imp

    management must select the question marks carefully

    future growth. The firm is advised to divest or harvest

    before its resources are drained

    Stars: It is the market leader in high growth market. Th

    users of cash rather suppliers. The firm must contin

    these businesses to maintain their market share. Sha

    in important for star businesses to become cash cows r

    as their ind stries mat re

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    11/65

    Resource Allocation and Strategy Imp

    Cash Cows: Businesses of high relative share of low-gr

    Generate cash to support stars and question marks. Wh

    to harvest too much of cash from such businesses they

    from premature decline.

    Dogs: Low-Share businesses with low growth markets.

    one of the options for these businesses or harvesting is

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    12/65

    Resource Allocation and Strategy Imp

    Question

    Marks

    Stars

    Cash

    Cows

    Dogs

    Stars Qu

    Cash Cows

    High

    Low

    Market

    Growth

    Rate

    Competitive Position (Ratios of Share to Share

    Competitor)

    10 High 1.0

    0.1

    CashFlows

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    13/65

    Limitations of Growth Share Matrix

    Market Growth rate is an inadequate descrip

    industry attractiveness Relative market share is inadequate as a d

    overall competitive strength

    The outcomes of a growth-share analysis are hito variations in how growth and share are m

    While the matrix specifies appropriate investmfor each business, it provides little guidance onimplement those strategies

    The model implicitly assumes that all busineindependent of one another except for the flow o

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    14/65

    The Industry Attractiveness- Business Pos

    Matrix

    Business competitive position Evaluating Market Attractiv

    SizeGrowth

    Share By Segment

    Customer Loyalty

    Margins

    Distribution

    Technology SkillsPatents

    Marketing

    Flexibility

    SizeGrowth

    Customer Satisfaction L

    Competitions: Quantity,

    Effectiveness, Commitm

    Price Levels

    ProfitabilityTechnology

    Governmental Regulatio

    Sensitivity to Economic

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    15/65

    Alternative Portfolio Models

    1 1 2

    1 2 3

    2 3 3

    High Medium Low

    High

    Medium

    Low

    Market

    Attractiveness

    BusinessPosition:Its AbilitytoCompete

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    16/65

    Value Based Planning Value based planning is a resource allocation tool t

    overcome the shortcomings and unanswered questio

    analysis by assessing the shareholder value a given strcreate. Helps in identifying economic gain from invesbusinesses

    A number of value-based planning methods are currentshare three basic features:

    1. They assess the economic value a strategy is likely

    examining the cash flows it will generate rather tdistorted accounting measures such as return on inve

    2. They estimate the shareholder value that a strategy discounting its forecasted cash flows by the businesscost of capital

    3. They evaluate strategies based on the likelihood that

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    17/65

    Value based planning (Discounted Cash Flow Alfred Rappaport and the Alcar Group I

    Creating shareholder

    value

    Shareholder return

    Dividends

    Capital Gains

    Ma

    Discount RateCash flow from

    operations

    Working capitalinvestment

    Fixed capital

    investment

    Sales growthOperating profit

    margin

    Income tax rate

    Value growth duration

    Operating Investment

    Corporate

    Objective

    Valuation

    Component

    ValueDrivers

    Management

    Decision

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    18/65

    Limitations of Value based planning

    Value based planning is not substitute to strategic plannevaluates strategy alternatives

    Inaccurate forecast of cash flows can create problems i

    value based planning

    Some kind of strategic alternatives are undervalued

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    19/65

    Prof. Shailja Bhakar

    Unit 3 Part B: Business Strategies an

    Impact on Marketing Strategies

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    20/65

    Strategic Decisions at the Business-U

    Where a firm is organized into separate divisions eng

    industries and/or marketing activities, these divisions arebusiness units or SBUs.

    It is the responsibility of the SBU manager to develop marke

    analyzing their specific market, determining objectives and

    plans in line with the corporate directives and goals.

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    21/65

    Defining Strategic Business Units

    SBUs typically feature the following traits:-

    They service an homogenous set of markets with a limtechnologies

    They offer unique products or services from other SBUs within th

    They are in control of the factors required for success within tfinancial, R&D, equipment, manufacturing and/or human resourc

    They operate as a profit centre (responsible for planningmonitoring, controlling and reporting their profit/loss to their corpo

    How product markets should be clustered into a business unit:

    Technical Compatibility

    Similarity in customer Needs

    Similarity in personal characteristics

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    22/65

    Business unit objectives

    Each business unit is usually assigned unique objectives

    other SBUs) based on corporate objectives.

    They are specific enough to have meaning, yet broad eno

    innovation and specialized market knowledge.

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    23/65

    Allocating Resources within the Busin Resource allocation within a SBU can utilize the same

    corporate level allocations; e.g. value-based and portfolio m

    It is generally acknowledged that the value-based tools are

    the SBU level as the information gathered is more specific

    is usually a known size whereas industry attractiveness

    subjective or non-specific

    At SBU level managers must determine1. Attractiveness of individual markets

    2. Competitive position of their product within those markets

    3. Cash flows each product entry will likely generate rather

    industry attractiveness and the overall competitive strength

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    24/65

    The Business Units Competitive Stra

    Achieving a competitive advantage requires a business

    two choices:

    1. What is SBUs competitive domain or scope

    2. How will the business unit distinguish itself from comp

    target markets

    Michael E Porter generated a model through which firm

    choice about the type of competitive advantage:

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    25/65

    Porters Four Business Strategies

    Low Cost Diffe

    Broad Target Cost Leadership Diffe

    Narrow Target Cost Focus Diffe

    Source of Competitive Advantag

    Competitive

    Scope

    R b t E Mil d Ch l C S id

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    26/65

    Robert E. Miles and Charles C Snow iden

    another set of business strategies

    Prospector

    1. Undergoes periodic redefinition

    2. Values being the first mover in new product and mark

    3. Responds rapidly to early signals concerning areas of

    4. Competes primarily by stimulating and meeting new mopportunities

    Defender

    1. Attempts to locate and maintain secure position in staservice areas

    2. Offers relatively limited range of products or services ccompetitors

    3. Offers lower prices, high quality and better service the

    4. Not at the forefront of technological new product deve

    Robert E Miles and Charles C Sno iden

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    27/65

    Robert E. Miles and Charles C Snow iden

    another set of business strategies Analyzer

    1. An intermediate type make fewer and slower products mar

    than prospectors but is also not committed to stability and defenders

    2. Maintain stable limited line of products or services carefullypromising new product developing in the market

    3. Seldom a first mover

    Reactor

    1. Lack any well defined policy for competition2. Does not have as consistent a product market orientation a

    3. Not as willing to assume the risk of new products

    4. Not aggressive in marketing established products

    5. Responds primarily when it is forced by environmental pres

    Combined typology of business unit comp

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    28/65

    Combined typology of business unit comp

    strategies

    Units primarilyconcerned withattaining growth

    throughaggressive pursuitof new product-

    marketopportunities

    Units with strongcore business;

    actively seeking toexpand into

    related product-markets with

    differentiatedofferings

    Units primarilyconcerned withmaintaining adifferentiated

    position in maturemarkets

    Units with strong

    core business;

    actively seeking to

    expand into related

    product-markets

    with low-cost

    Units primarily

    concerned with

    maintaining a low-

    cost position in

    mature markets

    Prospector Analyzer Defender

    Heavy Emphasis

    No Emphasis

    CostLeadership

    Differentiation

    CompetitiveStrategy

    Emphasis on New product-Market Growth

    B i St t i Diff i S Obj ti R D l

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    29/65

    Business Strategies Differ in Scope, Objectives, Resource Deploym

    Dimensions Low Cost Defender Differentiated Defender Prospector A

    Scope Mature/Stable/Welldefined domain;mature technologyand customersegments

    Mature/Stable/Welldefined domain; maturetechnology and customersegments

    Broad/Dynamic domains;technology and customersegment not well defined

    Mp

    Goals & Obj.Adaptability(New Pdt.success)

    Very Little Little Extensive MP

    Effectiveness(Incr. in MKTShare)

    Little Little Large MP

    Efficiency(ROI) High High Low MP

    ResourceDeployment

    Generate excesscash

    Generate excess cash Need cash for productdevelopment

    NdP

    Synergy Need to seekoperating synergiesto achieve

    Need to seek operatingsynergies to achieveefficiencies

    Danger in sharingoperating facilities andprograms better to share

    Dft

    The fit between Business Strategies and t

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    30/65

    The fit between Business Strategies and t

    environment

    Different strategies pursue different objectives in differe

    different competitive approaches, they do not all wo

    under the same environmental circumstances

    Changing Strategies at different stages in the industry li

    External Prospector Analyzer Differentiated

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    31/65

    ExternalFactors

    Prospector Analyzer DifferentiatedDefender

    MarketCharacteristics

    Introductory or early

    growth stage of

    industry life cycle

    Many unidentified or

    underdeveloped

    customer segments

    Late growth or early

    maturity stage of industry

    life cycle

    Some segments well

    established but potential

    segments or application

    remain underdeveloped

    Maturity or decline

    stage of industry life

    cycle

    Most segments well

    developed; sales

    primarily due to repeat

    replacement purchase

    Technology Newly emergingtechnology

    Basic technology well

    developed but product

    improvements/

    modification still possible

    Basic technology fully

    developed and stable

    Competition Few establishedcompetitors

    Industry structure still

    emerging

    Many CompetitorsIndustry structure still

    emerging

    Changes in relative

    market shares likely

    Several wellestablished competitor

    Industry structure

    stable but consolidatio

    is possible

    Businesss R&D Process engineering Process engineering

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    32/65

    Marketing Implications of Different Business

    Business units typically incorporate a number of distinct prod

    A marketing manager monitors and evaluates the products esituations and develop marketing program suited to it

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    33/65

    Marketing Implications of Different Business

    MARKETING POLICIES AND PROGRAM COMPONENTSProspectorStrategy

    DifferenDefendeStrategy

    PRODUCT POLICIESProduct line breadth relative to competitorsTechnical sophistication of products relative to competitorsProduct quality relative to competitorsService quality relative to competitorsPRICE POLICIES Price levels relative to competitors

    DISTRIBUTION POLICIESDegree of forward vertical integration relative to competitorsTrade promotion expenses as percentage of sales relative tocompetitorsPROMOTION POLICIESAdvertising expenses as percentage of sales relative tocompetitorsSales promotion expenses as percentage of sales relative tocompetitors

    ++??

    +

    _+

    ++?

    ++++

    +

    +_

    ??+

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    34/65

    Impact of service characteristic on ma

    The business level competitive strategy pursued by bus

    same implications for marketing policies and program e

    those for goods

    But services have certain characteristics that give rise to

    marketing problems and therefore demand special kind

    policies and actions

    M k ti

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    35/65

    Marketing

    Intangibility Perishability Customer Contact V

    Designing facilities and

    products serve assymbols of service

    quality

    The service firms

    personnel can also be

    important tangible

    symbols of service

    quality

    Creating a tangiblerepresentation of the

    service

    Tying the marketing of

    services to the

    marketing of goods

    Smoothing out

    the variability indemand

    Lowering fixed

    costs by making

    capacity more

    flexible

    There is a high degree of

    uncertainty in the day-to-dayoperations of high-contact

    systems because the customer

    can disrupt the production

    system in a variety of ways

    Rarely does the demand for a

    high-contact service equal

    capacity at any one time

    It is difficult to set up anefficient production schedule for

    high-contact services because

    customers cannot be

    programmed

    Appearance of employees

    directly affect customer

    U

    teU

    U

    te

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    36/65

    Prof. Shailja Bhakar

    Unit 3 Part C: Identification and Selectin

    Segments

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    37/65

    Market Segmentation, targeting and p Market Segmentation: is the process by which a marke

    distinct customer subsets of people with simila

    characteristics that lead them to respond in similar wayproduct offering and strategic marketing program. Msegment descriptors into four major categories: physiperson or firm related descriptors, product reladescriptors and customer need descriptors

    Market Targeting: Not all customers in a market can b

    one product at a time therefore the firms have to targwhich can maximize the profits. Targeting is done on threvenue potential and growth rate.

    Market Positioning: designing product offerings astrategic marketing programs which collectively creacompetitive advantage in the target market would

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    38/65

    Identification of Market Segments Physical Descriptors

    1. Age

    2. Gender3. Household Life Cycle/ Family Life Cycle

    4. Income

    5. Occupation

    6. Education

    7. Geography8. Event

    9. Race and ethnic origin

    Identification of Market Segments

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    39/65

    Identification of Market Segments General Behavior

    1. Lifestyle: Activities, Interest and Opinions

    2. Social Class

    3. Hobbies

    Industrial or firms behavioral descriptors

    1. Purchase Structure: Centralized and Decentralized

    2. Buying Situation: Straight Rebuy, Modified Rebuy, New buy

    Product Related Behavior

    1. Product Usage

    2. Loyalty

    3. Purchase Predisposition

    4. Innovativeness: Innovators, early adopters, late adopters, lag

    5. Present Customers

    Customer Needs: benefit sought, choice criteria

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    40/65

    Identification of Market Segments Global Market Segmentation

    1. Homogeneous

    2. Heterogeneous Service Segmentation

    1. Customers are part of production and delivery

    2. Problems of consistency

    These problems can be overcome by:

    1. Use of hard technologies2. Use of soft technologies

    3. Hybrid Technologies

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    41/65

    Selecting Market Segment Selection of meaningful descriptors (variables) in a given market

    1. A Priori (Determined in advance)

    2. Post Hoc (Research Based) Determination of whether and to what extent there are di

    dependent (outcome) variables. Such as benefit sought segmdemographics, product usage and lifestyle

    Evaluation of the results from step 2 to determine the eusefulness of the segment scheme

    1. Different: Segment must be distinguishable from all other segm2. Identifiable: Possibility of accessibility

    3. Adequate Size: To be cost effective

    4. Measurability: use of measurable variables should be possible

    5. Compatibility: Consistent with the companys resources

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    42/65

    Prof. Shailja Bhakar

    Unit 3 Part E: Positioning

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    43/65

    Types of positioning

    Positioning affects the way a customer perceives s

    therefore occurs in the customers mind. Promotin

    product or service from the customers mind when itsaim of positioning. There are several types of posit

    make this happen. They are:

    Physical positioning

    Perceptual positioning

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    44/65

    Types of positioning

    Physical Positioning: When a business intends for its pr

    services features to be compared with its competitors fe

    known as physical positioning This type of positioning is used in products in which cus

    evaluate the product by comparing it with the competitiv

    A limitation of this type of positioning is that it is technica

    Also customers attitude toward a product are based on

    comparisons of products aesthetics, appeal, status, ima

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    45/65

    Types of positioning Perceptual Positioning: When a business aims for

    services benefits to be compared with its competitor

    known as perceptual positioning. Unlike physical positioning, the technical details of the

    the major concern in the consumers mind. Instead, tinfluenced more so by the products or services branappeal or aesthetics. On paper, buying an automobile oalone would quickly narrow the market down to just a fe

    However, in the brand and image conscious minds of the look and image the vehicle portrays is more oftefeature. For example, theres no doubt that a Mercedezspecified automobile, yet the price tag, aesthetic appassociated with owning such a car is what sets it competitors not its top speed or handling characteristi

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    46/65

    Types of positioning

    Physical Positioning Perceptual Analysis

    Technical Orientation Consumer Orientation

    Physical Characteristics Perceptual Attributes

    Objective Measures Perceptual Measures

    Data Readily Available Need Marketing Research

    Physical Brand

    Properties

    Perceptual Brand Positions and p

    IntensitiesLarge Number ofDimension

    Limited Number of Dimension

    Represents impact ofproduct specificationsand price

    Represents Impact of Products Spand Communication

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    47/65

    Process of Positioning

    Identify relevant set of competitiveproducts

    Identify the set of determinant,attributes that defines the product

    space in which positions of current

    offerings are located

    Collect information from a sample ofcustomers about perceptions of each

    product on the determinant attributes

    Analyze intensity of a products

    current position in customers mindSelect positionin

    str

    Determine prlocation in th

    (Product

    Determine cu

    preferred cdetermin

    Examine thpreferences of and current po

    (Market P

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    48/65

    The Positioning Process Identify a relevant set of competitive products: Positionin

    take place at the

    1. Company level: How entire company is positioned against 2. Product Category: customers perception regarding produc

    used as a substitute for companies product is examined

    3. Product or Brand Levels: how brand is perceived comparecompetitors brand

    Identify determinant attributesFeatures Parentage Endorsements Pr

    di

    Benefits ManufacturingProcess

    Comparison P

    Usage: end use, demographic,psychographic or behavioral

    Ingredients Pro-Environment

    Coar

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    49/65

    The Positioning Process Determine consumers perception: two main technologie

    analyze customers perceptions about the competitivealternative products or brands are: Multiple Dimension Sc

    Discriminate Analysis1. Discriminate analysis: determines the consumers perce

    on the basis of which attribute best discriminate among bra

    2. MDS: Paired comparison becomes complex when usedattributes as well as adding or deleting new brands to the c

    Analyze the intensity of a products current positioawareness by strongly associating it with several conc

    purchase decision.1. Marketing opportunities to gain positioning intensity

    2. Constraints imposed by an intense position

    a) Problem in repositioning

    b) Existing intense position could be diluted as a result of me

    c) New products dilute the image of old one if it is not succes

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    50/65

    The Positioning Process Analyze the products current position: Products

    can be identified by marketing research and analyzing

    techniques (Positioning grid or Perceptual Map andActual position of all competitors and the companys bridea about where to reposition the existing brand and wfor a new product. These gaps may occur due toTechnical constraints or unattractive market.

    Limitation of positioning analysis

    1. It only tells where consumers are positioning companycomparative to competitors

    2. It does not give idea about which is the most preferred

    3. Customers preferences can give an idea to solve this

    Th P i i i P

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    51/65

    The Positioning Process Determine consumers preferred combination of attributes: su

    can be asked to think of the ideal product or brand within a prohypothetical brand possessing the perfect combination of attributesviewpoint). Respondents could then rate the ideal product and exisnumber of attributes. Also it can be asked to the respondents to ndegree of similarity between pairs of existing brands but to aldegree of preference for each.

    Define Market positioning and market segmentation: market sbe defined to get an idea about the difference in the benefit so

    customers. A market position can simultaneously identify distinct mas well as perceived positions of different brands. By examining thcustomers in different segments together with their perceptions oexisting brands, analysts can learn much about:

    1. The competitive strength of different brands in different segments

    2. The intensity of the rivalry between brands in a given segment

    Th P iti i P

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    52/65

    The Positioning Process Select Positioning Strategies: The decision of where to po

    and how to reposition a brand should be based on boanalysis and market position analysis.

    1. Sales potential of market positions: Purchase intention sthe percentage of consumers who intend to buy a specactually searching for it.

    2. Evaluation of the sales potential of alternative positioconsider the more pertinent market dynamics. These inclu

    a) Growth of market segments

    b) Evolution ofsegments ideal points

    c) Changes in positioning intensity

    d) Evolution of existing brands positions

    e) Emerging attributes

    f) Development of new segments

    g) Introduction of new brands

    Th P iti i P

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    53/65

    The Positioning Process

    Market Positioning Strategies

    1. Mono-segment Positioning

    2. Multi-segment Positioning

    3. Standby Positioning

    4. Imitative Positioning

    5. Anticipatory Positioning

    6. Adaptive Positioning

    7. Defensive Positioning

    Positioning of services: is similar to products

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    54/65

    Prof. Shailja Bhakar

    Unit 3 Part D: Differentiation Strat

    C t I t d S

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    55/65

    Concept, Importance and Sources Consumers will choose one product over another fo

    reasons; the specific marketing mix, the unique selling

    personal selling skills of an individual all affect the decisA marketers role is to ensure that the most favorable c

    place for the consumer to buy the particular product.

    One way in which to achieve this is to stand out from tThis can be achieved through unique attractive packagadvertising, brand associations, effective positionin

    different value proposition or a combination of all of thes The important point is that the product or service has

    from the competitors in order to grow sales. This is differentiation strategy.

    I t

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    56/65

    Importance

    Increase the perceived value of firms products (or serv

    to competitors products (or services)

    Create a customer preference for firms products / serv

    Increase in sales

    Building Brand Image and Corporate Image

    Increasing Market Share

    Sources

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    57/65

    Sources

    Product Attributes

    Firm-Customer RelationshipFirm Linkages

    Product Attribute

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    58/65

    INTANGIBLE DIFFUnobservable and subjectcharacteristics relating to exclusivity, identity

    TANGIBLE DIFFERENTATIONObservable product characteristics: size, color, materials, etc. performance packaging complementary services

    Product Features

    Product Complexity e.g. multiple functions on mobileTiming of Introductionbeing the first to market, e.g. SWalkman

    Location e.g. restaurant located next to a metro statio

    Product Attribute

    Firm-Customer Relationship

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    59/65

    Customization creating a unique product for a customer

    e.g. custom-tailored suit, custom-made bike/ Cars (Rolls Royc

    Consumer Marketing creating brand loyalty

    e.g. strong advertising (Coke, Nike)

    Reputation creating reputation for brand

    e.g. sponsoring events (Red Bull Air Race)

    Firm Linkages

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    60/65

    Linkages among functions in the company to exploit cert

    e.g. skills, for example engineered by Lotus Protons

    Linkages with other companies to exploit certain resource

    e.g. reputation, for example Porsche Design products

    Product Mix offering extended product mix to attract custom

    e.g. a coffee shop selling food

    A product differentiation strategy mmeet

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    61/65

    meet

    VRIO

    Is it Valuable

    Is it Rare?

    Is it costly to Imitate?

    Is the firm Organized to exploit it?

    if it is to create competitive advantage.

    A product differentiation strategy mmeet

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    62/65

    meet Value: Does differentiation result in an increase in revenues?

    customers willing to pay premium?

    higher sales of product?

    Rarity: By definition, we can assume rareness (if product/service is truthen it is, by definition, rare but do consumers value it?) Imitability: How easy/costly would it be for competitors to imitate the diff1. Logic of costs of imitation

    a) if would-be imitators face a cost disadvantage of imitation, theychoose not to imitate

    2. Substitutes

    a) if a base of differentiation is valuable, others will attempt to imitaduplication and/or substitution

    b) if no substitutes are obvious, then we would conclude that imitasubstitution will be costly at least for the present time

    Exploiting Opportunities

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    63/65

    Exploiting Opportunities Fragmented Industry

    Branding: commodity differentiated product

    Example: Kelloggs Corn Flakes

    Emerging Industry

    First mover advantages: captures market share

    Example: Motorola Mobile Phones

    Mature Industry

    Refining product or adding services

    Example: IBMs emphasis on service

    Declining Industry Exploiting niches: serving those with strong needs/preferenc

    Example: production of analogue films

    Exploiting other opportunities

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    64/65

    Exploiting other opportunities Trends or Fads

    Social Causes

    Government Policy Economic Conditions

    Service Differentiation

  • 7/28/2019 Unit III(1)

    65/65

    Service Differentiation

    Ordering Ease

    Delivery

    Installation Customer Training

    Customer Consulting

    Maintenance and Repair


Recommended