+ All Categories
Home > Documents > UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE BRO WARD …...Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on...

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE BRO WARD …...Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on...

Date post: 12-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
13
Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BRO WARD DIVISION LIONEL FLEMING, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, V. PENN DUTCH FOOD CENTER, INC., A Florida Profit Corporation, and PENN DUTCH FOOD CENTER II, INC., A Florida Profit Corporation, Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff, LIONEL FLEMING, on his own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated (collectively "Plaintiffs"), by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Complaint against Defendants, PENN DUTCH FOOD CENTER, INC., and PENN DUTCH FOOD CENTER II, INC. ("Penn Dutch" or "Defendants") and alleges as follows: INTRODUCTION 1. This is an action brought pursuant to the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988, 29 U.S.C. § 2101 et. seq. ("WARN Act"). 2. Defendants are liable under the WARN Act for their failure to provide the Plaintiff and all others similarly situated at least 60 days advance notice of their termination, as required by the WARN Act. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. This Court has jurisdiction over these claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
Transcript
Page 1: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE BRO WARD …...Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT

Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

BRO WARD DIVISION

LIONEL FLEMING, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff, V.

PENN DUTCH FOOD CENTER, INC., A Florida Profit Corporation, and PENN DUTCH FOOD CENTER II, INC., A Florida Profit Corporation,

Defendants.

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Plaintiff, LIONEL FLEMING, on his own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated

(collectively "Plaintiffs"), by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Complaint

against Defendants, PENN DUTCH FOOD CENTER, INC., and PENN DUTCH FOOD CENTER

II, INC. ("Penn Dutch" or "Defendants") and alleges as follows:

INTRODUCTION

1. This is an action brought pursuant to the Worker Adjustment and Retraining

Notification Act of 1988, 29 U.S.C. § 2101 et. seq. ("WARN Act").

2. Defendants are liable under the WARN Act for their failure to provide the Plaintiff

and all others similarly situated at least 60 days advance notice of their termination, as required by

the WARN Act.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

3. This Court has jurisdiction over these claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.

Page 2: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE BRO WARD …...Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT

Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 2 of 7

4. Venue is proper in the Court because all facts material to all claims set forth herein

occurred in Broward County, Florida.

PARTIES

5. At all times material to this action, Defendants were Florida Profit Corporations

conducting business in Broward County, Florida.

6. Plaintiff worked for Defendants in Broward County, Florida.

GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

7. Plaintiffs were employed by Defendants.

8. During the week of September 11,2019, Defendants, without warning, closed their

Hollywood and Margate plants without properly notifying Plaintiffs.

9. No prior written notice was provided to the Plaintiffs as required by the WARN act.

10. Plaintiffs have retained the services of the undersigned attorneys and are obligated

to pay the undersigned a reasonable fee for their services.

11. Plaintiffs demand a trial by jury on all claims alleged herein.

CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS

12. Plaintiffs sue under Rule 23(a) and (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for

violations of the WARN Act, on behalf of themselves, and a class of employees who worked at or

reported to the Defendants' Hollywood and Margate facilities, and were laid off without cause by

Defendants as part of a reasonably foreseeable result of shutdowns or mass layoffs ("Class")

during the week of September 11, 2019.

13. The persons in the Class ("Class Members") are so numerous that joinder of all

members is impracticable as there are, upon information and belief, approximately two-hundred

(200) potential class members.

2

Page 3: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE BRO WARD …...Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT

Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 3 of 7

14. There are questions of law and fact common to the Class Members, namely:

(a) Whether the Class Members were employees of Defendants who worked at or

reported to Defendants' Hollywood or Margate facilities;

(b) Whether Defendants ordered the termination of employment of each of the

Class Members without cause on their part and without giving them 60 days

advance written notice as required by the WARN Act; and

(c) Whether the Defendants were subject to any of the defenses provided for in the

WARN Act;

15. The claims of the representative Plaintiff are typical of the claims of the Class, as

he/they were laid off as part of the shutdown or mass layoff, and did not receive the requisite

notice.

16. The representative Plaintiff will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the

class.

17. The named Plaintiff retained counsel competent and experienced in complex class

action employment litigation.

18. A class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient

adjudication of this controversy—particularly in the context of WARN Act and wage litigation —

where the individual Plaintiff and class members may lack the financial resources to vigorously

prosecute a lawsuit in federal court against corporate defendants and separate actions would create

a risk of inconsistent or varying adjudications with respect to individual class members and the

adjudications with respect to individual class members would be dispositive of the interests of

other members.

19. Defendants have acted on grounds that apply generally to the class.

3

Page 4: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE BRO WARD …...Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT

Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 4 of 7

20. There are questions of law and fact common to the Class Members that predominate

over any questions solely affecting individual members of the Class, including but not limited to:

(a) Whether the Class Members were employees of Defendants who worked at or

reported to Defendants' Hollywood and Margate facilities;

(b) Whether Defendants ordered the termination of employment of each of the

Class Members without cause on their part and without giving them 60 days

advance written notice as required by the WARN Act; and

(c) Whether Defendants were subject to any of the defenses provided for in the

WARN Act.

WARN ACT ALLEGATIONS

21. Plaintiff and other similarly situated employees were laid off as part of plant

shutdowns or mass layoffs of a single site of employment as defined by the WARN Act, for which

they were entitled to receive 60 days advance written notice under the WARN Act.

22. At all relevant times, Defendants employed two hundred (200) or more employees,

exclusive of part-time employees, or employed 100 or more employees who in the aggregate

worked at least 4,000 hours per week exclusive of hours of overtime within the United States as

defined by the WARN Act, and employed more than one hundred employees at each of its

Hollywood and Margate plants.

23. At all relevant times, Defendants were "employers" as that term is defined by the

WARN Act.

24. During the week of September 11, 2019, Defendants ordered "shutdowns" or "mass

layoffs" as that term is defined by the WARN Act.

4

Page 5: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE BRO WARD …...Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT

Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 5 of 7

25. Defendants' actions at the Hollywood and Margate locations resulted in an

"employment loss" as that term is defined by the WARN Act for at least 33% of its workforce,

and at least 50 of its employees, excluding (a) employees who worked less than six of the twelve

months prior to the date WARN notice was required to be given and (b) employees who worked

an average of less than 20 hours per week during the 90-day period prior to the date WARN notice

was required to be given.

26. Defendants' termination of the Class Members' employment constituted plant

shutdowns or mass layoffs at a single site of employment as defined by the WARN Act.

27. The Plaintiff and each of the Class Members who were employed by Defendants

and then terminated by Defendant as a result of Defendants' executing plant shutdowns or mass

layoffs at the Hollywood and Margate facilities were "affected employees" as defined by the

WARN Act.

28. The Plaintiff and each of the Class Members are "aggrieved employees" of

Defendants as that term is defined by the WARN Act.

29. Pursuant to the WARN Act, Defendants were required to provide at least 60 days

prior written notice of the layoff, or notice as soon as practicable, to the affected employees, or

their representative, explaining why the sixty (60) days prior notice was not given.

30. Defendants failed to give at least sixty (60) days prior notice of the layoff in

violation of the WARN Act.

31. Defendants failed to pay the Plaintiff and each of the Class Members their

respective wages, salary, commissions, bonuses, accrued holiday pay and accrued vacation for 60

working days following their respective layoffs, and failed to make the pension and 401(k)

5

Page 6: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE BRO WARD …...Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT

Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 6 of 7

contributions, provide other employee benefits under ERISA, and pay their medical expenses for

60 calendar days from and after the dates of their respective terminations.

32. As a result of Defendants' failure to pay the wages, benefits and other monies as

asserted, the Plaintiff and Class Members were damaged in an amount equal to the sum of the

members' unpaid wages, accrued holiday pay, accrued vacation pay, accrued sick leave pay and

benefits which would have been paid for a period of sixty (60) calendar days after the date of the

their terminations.

33. All administrative notice requirements and prerequisites have been satisfied.

COUNT I VIOLATIONS OF THE WARN ACT AGAINST DEFENDANT

34. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1

through 32 as if fully stated herein.

35. Defendants' failure to provide Plaintiffs advanced written notice of their layoffs

constitutes a violation of the Warn Act.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that this Court award the following relief:

(a) An amount equal to the sum of: unpaid wages, salary, commissions,

bonuses, accrued holiday pay, accrued vacation pay pension and 401(k)

contributions and other ERISA benefits, for sixty (60) working days following the

member employee's termination, that would have been covered and paid under the

then applicable employee benefit plans had that coverage continued for that period,

all determined in accordance with the WARN Act, 29 U.S.C§2104(a)(1)(A);

(b) Certification that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 (a) and (b) and the WARN

Act, Plaintiffs and the Other Similarly Situated Former Employees constitute a

single class;

6

Page 7: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE BRO WARD …...Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT

Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 7 of 7

(c) Designation of Plaintiff, LIONEL FLEMING, as the Class Representative;

(d) Appointment of the undersigned attorneys as Class Counsel;

(e) Interest as allowed by law on the amounts owed under the preceding

paragraphs;

(f) The reasonable attorneys' fees and the costs and disbursements the

Plaintiffs incur in prosecuting this action, as authorized by the WARN Act; and

(g) Such other and any other additional relief as the Court deems just and

proper.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Plaintiffs further demand a jury trial on all issues so triable as of right.

Dated this 23rd day of September 2019.

Respectfully submitted

/s/ Noah E. Storch Noah E. Storch, Esq. Florida Bar No. 0085476 RICHARD CELLER LEGAL, P.A. 10368W. SR 84, Suite 103 Davie, Florida 33324 Telephone: (866) 344-9243 Facsimile: (954) 337-2771 E-mail: noah@floridaovertimelawyencom

Trial Counsel for Plaintiffs

7

Page 8: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE BRO WARD …...Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT

Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 1 of 2

AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the

Southern District of Florida

LIONEL FLEMING, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff(s)

V.

PENN DUTCH FOOD CENTER, INC., A Florida Profit Corporation, and

PENN DUTCH FOOD CENTER II, INC., A Florida Profit Corporation,

Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant's name and address) PENN DUTCH FOOD CENTER, INC. STEVE WEINBERG-REGISTERED AGENT 7805 SW 6TH COURT PLANTATION, FL 33324

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney, whose name and address are: RICHARD CELLER LEGAL, P.A.

NOAH E. STORCH, ESQUIRE 10368W. STATE ROAD 84, SUITE 103 DAVIE, FLORIDA 33324 TELEPHONE: (866) 344-9243 E-mail: [email protected]

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date: Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Page 9: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE BRO WARD …...Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT

Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 2 of 2

AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE (This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed R. Civ. P. 4 (1))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date)

0 I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; Or

CI I left the summons at the individual's residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual's last known address; or

CI I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date)

0 I returned the summons unexecuted because

0 Other (specify):

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ 0.00

; or

; Or

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date: Server's signature

Printed name and title

Server's address

Additional infoimation regarding attempted service, etc:

Page 10: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE BRO WARD …...Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT

Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 1 of 2

AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the

Southern District of Florida

LIONEL FLEMING, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff(s)

V.

PENN DUTCH FOOD CENTER, INC., A Florida Profit Corporation, and

PENN DUTCH FOOD CENTER II, INC., A Florida Profit Corporation,

Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant's name and address) PENN DUTCH FOOD CENTER II, INC. STEVE WEINBERG-REGISTERED AGENT 7805 SW 6TH COURT PLANTATION, FL 33324

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney, whose name and address are: RICHARD CELLER LEGAL, P.A.

NOAH E. STORCH, ESQUIRE 10368W. STATE ROAD 84, SUITE 103 DAVIE, FLORIDA 33324 TELEPHONE: (866) 344-9243 E-mail: [email protected]

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date: Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Page 11: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE BRO WARD …...Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT

Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 2 of 2

AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (1))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date)

CI I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date)

; or

[:3 I left the summons at the individual's residence or usual place of abode with (name)

,a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual's last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

CI I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

171 Other (specifi7):

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ 0.00

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date: Server's signature

Printed name and title

Server's address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Page 12: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE BRO WARD …...Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT

- 0 530 General IMMIGRATION O 535 Death Penalty

- 0 540 Mandamus & Other 10 550 Civil Rights O 555 Prison Condition

560 Civil Detainee — O Conditions of

Confinement

El 462 Naturalization Application 0 465 Other Immigration

Actions

JS 44 (Rev. GaiealleatcbtA29358-XXXX DocumeDIVIECIOVERTAIERISD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 1 of 2 The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM) NOTICE: Attorneys MUST Indicate AU Re-filed Cases Below.

I. (a) PLAINTIFFS LIONEL FLEMING, on behalf of himself and all DEFENDANTS PENN DUTCH FOOD CENTER, INC., A others similarly situated, Florida Profit Corporation, and PENN DUTCH

(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff Broward County of Residence of First Listed Defendant Broward (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)

NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.

(C) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) Attorneys (If Known)

Richard Celler Legal, P.A., Noah E. Storch, Esq., 10368 W. State Road 84, Suite 103, Davie, FL 33324 (866) 344-9243; Email:

(d) Check County Where Action Arose: 0 MIAMI- DADE ID MONROE C4 BROWARD 0 PALM BEACH CI MARTIN 0 ST, LUCIE 0 INDIAN RIVER 0 OKEECHOBEE 0 HIGHLANDS

II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an "X" in One Box Only)

O 1 U.S. Government Nt] 3 Federal Question Plaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party)

HI. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an "X" in One Box for Plaintif) (For Diversity Cares Only) and One Has for Defendant)

PTF DEF PTF DEF Citizen of This State 0 I 0 1 Incorporated or Principal Place 0 4 0 4

of Business In This State

Citizen of Another State 0 2 0 2 Incorporated and Principal Place O 5 0 5 of Business In Another State

Citizen or Subject of a 0 3 0 3 Foreign Nation O6 06 Foreign Country

Click here for: Nature of Suit Code Descriptions

Ej 2 U.S. Government 0 4 Diversity Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III)

IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an "X" in One Hox Only)

CONTRACT TORTS 0 110 Insurance 0 120 Marine 0 130 Miller Act CI 140 Negotiable Instrument 0 150 Recovery of Overpayment

& Enforcement ofJudgment 10 151 Medicare Act

0 152 Recovery of Defaulted

Student Loans (Excl. Veterans)

0 153 Recovery of Overpayment of Veteran's Benefits

o 160 Stockholders' Suits 0 190 Other Contract 0 195 Contract Product Liability 0 196 Franchise

REAL PROPERTY 210 Land Condemnation 220 Foreclosure

230 Rent Lease & Ejectment

240 Torts to Land

245 Tort Product Liability

290 All Other Real Property

PERSONAL INJURY 0 310 Airplane 0 315 Airplane Product

Liability 0 320 Assault, Libel &

Slander 0 330 Federal Employers'

Liability

0 340 Marine 0 345 Marine Product

Liability El 350 Motor Vehicle 0 355 Motor Vehicle

Product Liability 0 360 Other Personal

Injury o 362 Personal Injury -

Med. Malpractice CIVIl. RIGHTS

0 440 Other Civil Rights 0 441 Voting

0 442 Employment 1- 1 443 Housing/ '—' Accommodations 0 445 Amer. w/Disabilities

Employment o 446 Amer. w/Disabilities

Other 0 448 Education

PERSONAL INJURY 1:1 365 Personal Injury -

Product Liability O 367 Health Care/

Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability

O 368 Asbestos Personal

Injury Product Liability

PERSONAL PROPERTY El 370 Other Fraud O 371 Truth in Lending O 380 Other Personal

Property Damage O 385 Property Damage

Product Liability

PRISONER PETITIONS Habeas Corpus:

O 463 Alien Detainee ri 510 Motions to Vacate '—' Sentence

Other:

FORFEITURE/PENALTY 0 625 Drug Related Seizure

of Property 21 USC 881 0 690 Other

LABOR 0 710 Fair Labor Standards

Act 0 720 Labor/Mgmt, Relations 0 740 Railway Labor Act 0 751 Family and Medical

Leave Act 790 Other Labor Litigation

0 791 Empl. Ret. Inc. Security Act

BANKRUPTCY 0 422 Appeal 28 USC 158 0 423 Withdrawal

28 USC 157

PROPERTY RIGHTS 0 820 Copyrights 0 830 Patent

O Patent — Abbreviated '—' New Drug Application 0 840 Trademark

SOCIAL SECURITY 0 861 HIA (1395ff) 0 862 Black Lung (923) 0 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) 0 864 SSID Title XVI 0 865 RSI (405(g))

OTHER STATUTES O 375 False Claims Act o 376 Qui Tam (31 USC

3729 (a)) o 400 State Reapportionment O 410 Antitrust O 430 Banks and Banking O 450 Commerce O 460 Deportation

O 470 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations

O 480 Consumer Credit O 490 Cable/Sat TV 1p 850 Securities/Commodities/

Exchange O 890 Other Statutory Actions O 891 Agricultural Acts O 893 Environmental Matters O 895 Freedom of Information

Act O 896 Arbitration O 899 Administrative Procedure

Act/Review or Appeal of

Agency Decision 950 Constitutionality of State Statutes

FEDERAL TAX SUITS 0 870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff

or Defendant) ri 871 IRS—Third Party 26

USC 7609

V. ORIGIN (Place an "X" in One Box Only)

.,[6 1 Original 0 2 Removed 0 3 Re-filed 0 Proceeding from State (See VT

Court below)

4 Reinstated 0 5 Transferred from or another district Reopened (spec(y)

0 6 Multidistrict Litigation Transfer

7 Appeal to District Judge from Magistrate Judgment

D 8 Multidistrict Remanded from _Liti

Dga

irto

ctn "' Appellate Court

File

VI. RELATED/ (See instructions): a) Re-filed Case DYES ,t NO b) Related Cases DYES st NO RE-FILED CASE(S) JUDGE: DOCKET NUMBER:

Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing and Write a Brief Statement of Cause (Do not cite jurinfictional statutes unless diversity):

VII. CAUSE OF ACTION Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988,29 U.S.C. § 2101 et. seq. ("WARN Act").

LENGTH OF TRIAL via 4 days estimated (for both sides to try entire case)

CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION 40 UNDER F.R.C.P. 23

DEMAND $ CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint:

JURY DEMAND: •0 Yes 0 No

ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE & CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE DATE SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD

September 23, 2019

FOR OFFICE USE ONLY RECEIPT # AMOUNT 1FP JUDGE MAO JUDGE

VIII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT:

Page 13: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE BRO WARD …...Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT

Case 0:19-cv-62358-XXXX Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2019 Page 2 of 2

JS 44 (Rev. 06/17) FLSD Revised 06/01/2017

INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS 44

Authority For Civil Cover Sheet

The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filings and service of pleading or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the Clerk of Court for each civil complaint filed. The attorney filing a case should complete the form as follows:

I. (a) Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial) of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, use only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency and then the official, giving both name and title.

(b) County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides at the time of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In land condemnation cases, the county- of residence of the "defendant" is the location of the tract of land involved.)

(c) Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, noting in this section "(see attachment)".

11. Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Rule 8(a), F.R.C.P., which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an "X" in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below. United States plaintiff. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here. United States defendant. (2) When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an "X" in this box. Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code takes precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked. Diversity of citizenship. (4) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; federal question actions take precedence over diversity cases.)

III. Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Mark this section for each principal party.

IV. Nature of Suit. Nature of Suit Place an "X" in the appropriate box. If there are multiple nature of suit codes associated with the case, pick the nature of suit code that is most applicable. Click here for: Nature of Suit Code Descriptions.

V. Origin. Place an "X" in one of the seven boxes.

Original Proceedings. (1) Cases which originate in the United States district courts.

Removed from State Court. (2) Proceedings initiated in state courts may be removed to the district courts under Title 28 U.S.C., Section 1441. When the petition for removal is granted, check this box.

Refiled (3) Attach copy of Order for Dismissal of Previous case. Also complete VI.

Reinstated or Reopened. (4) Check this box for cases reinstated or reopened in the district court. Use the reopening date as the filing date.

Transferred from Another District. (5) For cases transferred under Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a). Do not use this for within district transfers or multidistrict litigation transfers.

Multidistrict Litigation. (6) Check this box when a multidistrict case is transferred into the district under authority of Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1407. When this box is checked, do not check (5) above.

Appeal to District Judge from Magistrate Judgment. (7) Check this box for an appeal from a magistrate judge's decision.

Remanded from Appellate Court. (8) Check this box if remanded from Appellate Court.

VI. Related/Refiled Cases. This section of the JS 44 is used to reference related pending cases or re-filed cases. Insert the docket numbers and the corresponding judges name for such cases.

VII. Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC 553

Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service

VIII. Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule 23, F.R.Cv.P.

Demand. In this space enter the dollar amount (in thousands of dollars) being demanded or indicate other demand such as a preliminary injunction.

Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded.

Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet.


Recommended