+ All Categories
Home > Documents > UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST PAGE 1 OF 2 ...

UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST PAGE 1 OF 2 ...

Date post: 19-Dec-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
32
UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST PAGE 1 OF 2 Board Intelligence Hub template UHL Emergency Performance Author: [Richard Mitchell] Date: [Thursday 4 June 2015] Executive Summary Paper S Context Although non-compliant, emergency performance has improved from last year but UHL remains under pressure because of the continuing and unseasonably high levels of attendance and admissions. We (UHL) need to work more effectively with Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland partners (LLR) to resolve this key problem. Questions 1. What more can UHL do to resolve this problem? 2. What more can our partners do to resolve this problem? 3. Besides trying to resolve the high levels of attendance and admissions what else does UHL need to focus on? Conclusion 1. We need to work more effectively on gaining greater control of the front door function. This may involve working with partners outside of LLR who have previous experience of resolving a similar problem. 2. CCG partners need to work more effectively on identifying the attendance/ admission avoidance schemes that are working in parts of the health economy and then need to develop an urgent plan to roll them out across the health system. 3. Out of hours ED performance remains to variable and is a key part of our UHL improvement plan. Input Sought We would welcome the board’s input regarding the pace and scale of change in the attendance and admission avoidance schemes.
Transcript

U N I V E R S I T Y H O S P I T A L S O F L E I C E S T E R N H S T R U S T P A G E 1 O F 2

Board Intelligence Hub template

UHL Emergency Performance Author: [Richard Mitchell] Date: [Thursday 4 June 2015]

Executive Summary Paper S

Context

Although non-compliant, emergency performance has improved from last year but UHL remains under

pressure because of the continuing and unseasonably high levels of attendance and admissions. We (UHL)

need to work more effectively with Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland partners (LLR) to resolve this key

problem.

Questions

1. What more can UHL do to resolve this problem?

2. What more can our partners do to resolve this problem?

3. Besides trying to resolve the high levels of attendance and admissions what else does UHL need to

focus on?

Conclusion

1. We need to work more effectively on gaining greater control of the front door function. This may

involve working with partners outside of LLR who have previous experience of resolving a similar

problem.

2. CCG partners need to work more effectively on identifying the attendance/ admission avoidance

schemes that are working in parts of the health economy and then need to develop an urgent plan to

roll them out across the health system.

3. Out of hours ED performance remains to variable and is a key part of our UHL improvement plan.

Input Sought

We would welcome the board’s input regarding the pace and scale of change in the attendance and

admission avoidance schemes.

U N I V E R S I T Y H O S P I T A L S O F L E I C E S T E R P A G E 2 O F 2

Board Intelligence Hub template

For Reference

Edit as appropriate:

1. The following objectives were considered when preparing this report:

Safe, high quality, patient centred healthcare [Yes /No /Not applicable]

Effective, integrated emergency care [Yes /No /Not applicable]

Consistently meeting national access standards [Yes /No /Not applicable]

Integrated care in partnership with others [Yes /No /Not applicable]

Enhanced delivery in research, innovation & ed’ [Yes /No /Not applicable]

A caring, professional, engaged workforce [Yes /No /Not applicable]

Clinically sustainable services with excellent facilities[Yes /No /Not applicable]

Financially sustainable NHS organisation [Yes /No /Not applicable]

Enabled by excellent IM&T [Yes /No /Not applicable]

2. This matter relates to the following governance initiatives:

Organisational Risk Register [Yes /No /Not applicable]

Board Assurance Framework [Yes /No /Not applicable]

3. Related Patient and Public Involvement actions taken, or to be taken: [Insert here]

4. Results of any Equality Impact Assessment, relating to this matter: [Insert here]

5. Scheduled date for the next paper on this topic: 2 July 2015

6. Executive Summaries should not exceed 1 page. [My paper does comply]

7. Papers should not exceed 7 pages. [My paper does comply]

1

REPORT TO: Trust Board

REPORT FROM: Richard Mitchell, Chief Operating Officer

REPORT SUBJECT: Emergency Care Performance Report

REPORT DATE: 4 June 2015

The emergency care performance report will now take a more consistent approach to reviewing emergency

performance from one trust board to another. The suggested key points which will be covered are:

• High level performance review

• Update on UHL plan

• LLR KPIs

• Key risks

High level performance review

• 91.8% year to date (+6.7% on last year)

• Attendance +2.6%

• Admissions +7.3%

• 2990 more patients cared for within four hours

• April 2015 92.4% vs 86.9% April 2014

• May 2015 91.6% vs 83.4% May 2015

• Performance remains consistently below 95%.

UHL has a key role to work with partners to improve performance and there is now a clear view that inflow

remains the single biggest problem. Internal flow and process within UHL have improved dramatically over the

last 12 months and progress has been made with partners including Leicester Partnership Trust to discharge

more patients in a timely and high quality manner. However, as previously stated at Trust Board, to achieve

sustainable improvement requires all parts of the health economy to improve.

Update on UHL plan

We continue to make progress on our internal flow plan. The plan is monitored through the weekly Emergency

Quality Steering Group and of the 62 actions identified most are on track or complete, details below.

Row Labels Count of Actions

1. Not yet commenced 24

2. Significant delay – unlikely to be completed as planned 2

3. Some delay – expected to be completed as planned 2

4. On track 32

5. Complete 1

6. Complete and regular review 1

Grand Total 62

The detailed plan that went to EQSG on 27/5 is attached. A point of particular focus is out of hours ED

resilience as performance at that time of day often deteriorates. Also attached is a more detailed update on

out of hours ED resilience. We have 17 key actions within this plan that form part of the 62 actions and they

are broadly on track.

LLR KPIs

LLR KPIs are attached and are tracked through the fortnightly Urgent Care Board.

2

Key risks

The key risks identified in the last Trust Board report remain:

1. Communications- Attendances and admissions remain high. LLR needs an effective communications

message directly to GPs, care homes, nursing home and carers of patients restating the importance of

choosing wisely and acknowledging where the risks currently are.

2. There remains an urgent requirement to spot purchase nursing home and care home beds to alleviate

some of the pressure within UHL and LPT.

3. Surge capacity – we continue to see increasing rates of admissions and we have no surge capacity.

4. Progress has been made with short notice cancellations but risks remain around; EMAS capacity,

overcrowding in ED/ CDU, handover delays in ED and overstretched nursing and medical capacity.

5. We need to unite the deliverability of the urgent care agenda and Better Care Together

Conclusion

The fragile nature of the pathway means that slow adoption of improvements in one part of the health

economy stops overall improvement. We must set challenging expectations for all parts of the health

economy (including UHL) and work to ensure these expectations are met. Current progress is insufficient to

provide a higher quality of care to our patients in winter 2015-16.

Recommendations

The Trust Board is recommended to:

• Note the contents of the report

• Note the UHL update against the delivery of the new operational plan

• Seek assurance on UHL and LLR progress

ED Reliable Performance Progress Update

19/05/15

ED Reliable Performance – Context

# Description # Description

1 Occupancy is not low before spike in demand 10 Medical and nursing staffing capacity

2 Patients waiting for beds before spike in demand 11 Portering

3 We have an unusual pattern of attendance 12 Flow to CDU

4 Limitations imposed by the size of the department 13 Dependency on NIC & DIC

5 Period of handover slows decisions down 14 Transfer ambulances

6 UCC send patients up late 15 Paeds flow

7 Whole hospital response 16 Skill Mix

8 Minors closes during the night 17 Resus (excessive activity)

9Outflow does not keep up with the rate that patients are

added to the bed list18 Lack of strong and clear capacity plan at 4pm

The list below represents the 18 key factors affecting reliable ED performance.

The following slides detail (where applicable) the actions being taken to address the issue and the estimated

impact of these actions

ED Reliable Performance – Context

The purpose of today’s session is to:

1.Discuss whether actions are the correct actions

2.Provide assurance on whether all possible steps to complete actions are being taken

Thinking should be structured around:

4Monitoring – delivery of the action

• Have you clearly articulated a timeline for the delivery, including sub-actions?

• How will you know when the action is complete? i.e. what will be true once it’s finished?

3

Monitoring – delivery of the benefits• How do you plan to track the efficacy of the action?

• What changes in the KPIs are you predicting? What quantum of change?

• How frequently will data be reviewed? What is the plan if the impact is not happening?

2

Evidence – effectiveness of solution• What is the discrete action you are proposing to solve the problem?

• To what extent will it resolve the problem? What data supports this view?• What other actions were considered? Why were they discounted?

1

Evidence – significance of the problem

• What issue are you trying to solve?

• To what extent is this problem? What data do you have to support this claim?• Why are you prioritising this issue over others?

1. Occupancy is not low before spike in demand

Evidence of Issue Likely Impact of Actions Comments

Data analysis showed that each additional person in Majors

equated to an extra 7 mins in dep’tMedium

The actions listed here address attempts to curb ED

attendances and be more responsive if there are periods of

high inflow. ED attendances lie largely out of UHL control

Action Action Status OwnerCompletion

Date

UHL-ED11: Co-design with ED staff a process for having (?hourly) Situational Awareness updates from

all ED areas to help with timely escalation4. On track Ben Teasdale 28/05/2015

UHL-WHR1: Work with key specialties to improve the referral process when ED is an appropriate

route and reduce numbers of patients which are inappropriately sent via ED

1. Not yet

commencedJulie Dixon 01/08/2015

UHL-WHR2: Complete "ED Road Tour" to improve links between specialties and ED and promote

understanding of 'Exit Block'

1. Not yet

commencedJulie Dixon 30/06/2015

UHL-ED3: Review ED process delays through monthly journey meetings to identify causal factors6. Complete and

regular reviewJulie Dixon 01/05/2015

UHL-ED7: Work with each area in the ED to reduce time from bed allocation to departure from

department4. On track Ben Teasdale 30/09/2015

2. Patients waiting for beds before spike in demand

Evidence of Issue Likely Impact of Actions Comments

Evidence of strong correlation between time from bed request

to bed allocation and performance against the 4 hour target

(0.89)

MediumFocussing on standardising discharge processes to remove

variation between staff

Action Action Status OwnerCompletion

Date

UHL-AMU1: Improve the discharge process on AMU and utilisation of AMC to reduce the time from

bed request to bed allocation 4. On track Lee Walker 24/06/2015

UHL-WHR10: Create rapid bed turnaround (cleaning) team to reduce time from bed request to bed

allocation4. On track Julie Dixon 30/06/2015

UHL-ED10: Map out EDU processes to understand areas of opportunity for improving flow through the

unit. 4. On track Mark Williams 30/06/2015

5. Period of handover slows decisions down

Evidence of Issue Likely Impact of Actions Comments

Anecdotal - needs further work to quantify impact of this Low

Opportunity primarily lies in mitigating actions either side of

handover period.

Plan in place for diagnostic work – see supplementary slide

Action Action Status OwnerCompletion

Date

UHL-WHR9: Look into improving efficiency during handover times 4. On track Julie Dixon 30/06/2015

6. UCC send patients up late

Evidence of Issue Likely Impact of Actions Comments

Anecdotal evidence in A&E tracker log and exclamation mark

report – to be quantifiedLow

Need to consider the implication of re-contracting the Front

Door

Action Action Status OwnerCompletion

Date

UHL-ED14: Analyse patterns and reasons for UCC late referrals to inform solutions 1. Not yet

commencedBen Teasdale 30/06/2015

7. Whole Hospital Response

Evidence of Issue Likely Impact of Actions Comments

Anecdotal - variation in performance between different on call

teamsMedium

There needs to be further actions post June to embed use of

WHR and cultural change

Action Action Status OwnerCompletion

Date

Define on call competencies for Whole Hospital Response roles and self assess current state to inform

escalation training 4. On track Julie Dixon 19/06/2015

Hold escalation scenario training for X% (?80%) of relevant staff to reduce variability in response 4. On track Julie Dixon 19/06/2015

Create rapid bed turnaround (cleaning) team to reduce time from bed request to bed allocation 4. On track Julie Dixon 30/06/2015

Complete "ED Road Tour" to improve links between specialties and ED and promote understanding of

'Exit Block' 1. Not yet

commencedJulie Dixon 30/06/2015

Design and implement a robust management framework for monitoring & addressing actions taken when

on escalation to ensure consistent, timely response4. On track Julie Dixon 30/06/2015

Explore use of anaesthetists to support airways instead of ITU 5. Complete TBC 30/06/2015

Look into improving efficiency during handover times 4. On track Julie Dixon 30/06/2015

Work with specialties to update their whole hospital response and design role cards to improve

confidence / consistency in performing escalation protocols

1. Not yet

commencedJulie Dixon 31/07/2015

Work with key specialties to improve the referral process when ED is an appropriate route and reduce

numbers of patients which are inappropriately sent via ED

1. Not yet

commencedJulie Dixon 01/08/2015

Put in place new protocols to monitor adherence to outlier criteria to ensure that actions taken during

escalation do not compromise patient experience and lead to sustainable performance the following day4. On track Julie Dixon 30/08/2015

Introduce iPorter across the Trust to reduce portering delays 1. Not yet

commencedJulie Dixon 01/09/2015

8. Minors closes during the night

Action Action Status OwnerCompletion

Date

UHL-ED8: Analyse data to determine the optimal opening hours for ED Minors and develop action

plan if changes are required to improve patient flow4. On track Ben Teasdale 15/06/2015

Evidence of Issue Likely Impact of Actions Comments

Anecdotal evidence in A&E tracker log and exclamation mark

report – to be quantifiedLow

Need to consider the implication of re-contracting the Front

Door

9. Outflow does not keep up with the rate that

patients are added to the bed listEvidence of Issue Likely Impact of Actions Comments

High correlation (0.89) between time from bed request to

allocation and performance against 4 hour targetHigh Need to assess impact of real time bed state once live

Action Action Status OwnerCompletion

Date

UUHL-AMU1: Improve the discharge process on AMU and utilisation of AMC to reduce the time from

bed request to bed allocation 4. On track Lee Walker 24/06/2015

UHL-ED7: Work with each area in the ED to reduce time from bed allocation to departure from

department4. On track Ben Teasdale 30/09/2015

UHL-WHR10: Create rapid bed turnaround (cleaning) team to reduce time from bed request to bed

allocation4. On track Julie Dixon 30/06/2015

UHL-BW2: Increase the accuracy of recorded discharge time to capture and encourage early

discharges

2. Significant

delay – unlikely

to be completed

as planned

Ian Lawrence 30/06/2015

UHL-BW3: Implement "real-time bed state-'light' " to capture and encourage early discharges

2. Significant

delay – unlikely

to be completed

as planned

Jane Edyvean 30/06/2015

UHL-BW8: Review bed bureau processes to reduce discharge-delays HL-AMU1: Improve the discharge

process on AMU and utilisation of AMC to reduce the time from bed request to bed allocation 4. On track Julie Dixon 30/05/2015

10. Medical and nursing staffing capacity

Evidence of Issue Likely Impact of Actions Comments

A&E nursing not funded up to NICE guidance / acuity tool

numbers

Consultant numbers do not match requirements for new floor

Low

In the immediate term there is little that can be done with

workforce capacity issues

Need to explore investing in alternative roles e.g. ACPs

Action Action Status OwnerCompletion

Date

UHL-ED12: Look at each stream within the ED separately to determine if their independent staffing

patterns can cope with 85 percentile of activity (including number of staff, skill mix and rotas) to

increase robustness of staffing cover

4. On track Ben Teasdale 30/06/2015

11. Portering

Evidence of Issue Likely Impact of Actions Comments

Simulation Tool found this had a measurable impact on

performance

Need to use iPorter data to quantify time spent waiting for

porters

MediumOutstanding issue of having sufficient numbers at peak times

– need to explore ability to better flex numbers

Action Action Status OwnerCompletion

Date

UHL-ED5: Trial iPorter in ED with a view to permanent implementation to reduce portering delays 4. On track Ben Teasdale 30/06/2015

UHL-WHR11: Introduce iPorter / CARPS across the Trust to reduce portering delays1. Not yet

commencedJulie Dixon 01/09/2015

12. Flow to CDU

Evidence of Issue Likely Impact of Actions Comments

Anecdotal – pressure when Glenfield on a stop

Simulation Tool indicates additional attendances reduce

performance

High This is being mitigated by the Glenfield action plan.

Action Action Status OwnerCompletion

Date

Ensure there is PCC (primary care coordinator) support at Glenfield to match AMU at LRI4. On track Sam Leak 13/05/2015

Review nursing rotas and working practices to ensure that patients are triaged within 15 minutes4. On track Lisa Graham 03/06/2015

Design a robust system to ensure that patients receive clinical assessment within 60 minutes 4. On track Catherine Free 03/06/2015

Design a robust system to deliver cardiology consultant review within 14 hours to 95% of patients 2. Significant delay

– unlikely to be

completed as

planned

Jan Kovac 03/06/2015

Design a robust system to deliver respiratory consultant review within 14 hours to 95% of patients 4. On track Kim Ryanna 03/06/2015

Increase numbers of monitored cardiology beds in base wards 2. Significant delay

– unlikely to be

completed as

planned

Jan Kovac 30/06/2015

Improve computer access and reduce overcrowding in CDU to reduce delays 4. On track Kim Ryanna 30/06/2015

Develop SLA with CSI to optimise therapy cover in CDU to reduce discharge delays 4. On track Jodie Billings 30/06/2015

Improve imaging access to match AMU /AFU to reduce discharge delays4. On track

Dan Barnes/Cathy

Lea 30/06/2015

Improve pharmacy support for CDU out-of-hours, to reduce discharge delays 4. On track Bhavisha Pattani 01/07/2015

13. Dependency on nurse in charge and doctor in charge

Evidence of Issue Likely Impact of Actions Comments

Anecdotal – similar inflow / occupancy profiles result in very

different performanceLow

Situational awareness and SOPs will support NIC & DIC

however difficult to eradicate individual differences

Action Action Status OwnerCompletion

Date

UHL-ED11: Co-design with ED staff a process for having (?hourly) Situational Awareness updates from

all ED areas to help with timely escalation4. On track Ben Teasdale 28/05/2015

14. Transfer ambulances

Evidence of Issue Likely Impact of Actions Comments

Within ED

c.3% of ED attendances require a transfer – this equates to 9

per day

EDU Awaiting Transfer pathway shows an average of 70 people

per month with an average LoS of 2 hours.

Anecdotal evidence of very long waits e.g. 4 hrs, 7 hrs

Transport breaches due to waiting for transport were minimal

in 2014 data; the biggest effect is likely to be in taking away

EDU capacity

Within AMU/AMC

Anecdotal - Delays getting GP patients to AMC with 4hr

ambulances

Within Base Wards

Booking ambulances using the discharge lounge causes delays

due to process and batching

ED – Low For ED

This is further compounded by the fact that often ED patients

waiting for transfer are not accepted by the Discharge

Lounge. No action is addressing the constraint this poses.

For AMU/AMC

If 1 hour contract implemented fully this would have a

significant impact on attendance pattern

For BW

Base ward staff being trained to book patient transport using

the Arriva online booking system.

AMU/AMC – Medium

BW – Medium

Action Action Status OwnerCompletion

Date

UHL-BW9: Review transport booking process to reduce discharge delays 4. On track Julie Dixon 30/06/2015

UHL-ED1: Work with EMAS and CCGs to introduce CAD+ as the sole data set to monitor ambulance

handovers4. On track Rachel Williams 30/05/2015

16. Skill mix

Evidence of Issue Likely Impact of Actions Comments

LowLittle in immediate term that can address. Need to explore

investing in alternative roles e.g. ACPs

Action Action Status OwnerCompletion

Date

UHL-ED12: Look at each stream within the ED separately to determine if their independent staffing

patterns can cope with 85 percentile of activity (including number of staff, skill mix and rotas) to

increase robustness of staffing cover

4. On track Ben Teasdale 30/06/2015

17. Resus (excessive activity)

Evidence of Issue Likely Impact of Actions Comments

Average Resus occupancy for Dec was 8. LowOngoing capacity constraints in ITU, HDU & ACB makes

changes in ED of minimal effectiveness

Action Action Status OwnerCompletion

Date

UHL-WHR8: Explore use of anaesthetists to support airways instead of ITU 5. CompleteTBC 30/06/2015

Action

reference

number

Actions KPI trajectoryAction lead within the

organisation

Delivery date /

Next ReviewDelivery Status

Comments on delivery of the action, where closed what

follow up actions are required

UHL-AMB2 Establish current use of existing ambulatory care pathways in order to baseline performance

and measure improvements

Reduce admissions by 10% Catherine Free 06/05/2015

06/06/20154. On track

Initial baseline complete. Further meetings needed with each service

to understand coding and refine.

Agreement that method for tracking delivery is reduction in

admissions relating to targetted HRGs.

UHL-AMB1 Design and implement a headache and post fit pathway for EDU to reduce admissions Reduce admissions by 10% Catherine Free 27/05/2015

2. Significant delay –

unlikely to be

completed as planned

Headache pathway finalised and is being communicated to relevant

staff. Post fit pathway in development. Both pathways due for roll out

end of May.

Update on 18/5: Final stages for headache pathway are upload onto

intranet and signoff of patient information leaflet

Update on 26/5: Awaiting finalisation of content for patient

information leaflet from Martin Wiese ahead of uplodading. Post fit

pathway due at consultant meeting this week - if signed off ready for

implementationUHL-AMB3 Produce ambulatory pathway repository for UHL staff and GPs to increase use of existing

pathways

Reduce admissions by 10% Catherine Free 27/05/2015

2. Significant delay –

unlikely to be

completed as planned

Existing directory located. All services listed on directory being

contacted to provide updated information. New services identified

for inclusion in directory.

Update on 26/5: This is a larger piece of work than anticipated due to

need to meet with each service. This is on track for sharing with the

GPs at event on 23rd June and being finalised following this.

UHL-AMB4 Establish neurology ambulatory clinic to increase capacity in the AMC to treat GP referrals Reduce admissions by 10% Catherine Free 24/06/2015

4. On Track

Feedback session from initial trial held 28/04/15. Next steps are to

review registrar rota and confirm space requirements.

Update on 12/5/15: staffing available for M-T and Friday AM.

Working on staffing for Friday PM. Agreement at EQSG of need to

clear Bay 0 for clinic.

Update on 18/5/15: 1 registrar has resigned. This should not impact

go live date.UHL-AMB5 Work with CDU to develop ambulatory clinic to streamline flow through department Reduce admissions by 10% Catherine Free 30/06/2015

4. On track

Exploring potential staffing models.

18/5/15: Paper submitted for discussion at respiratory consultant

meeting on 29/5UHL-AMU6 Simplify discharge letters to reduce discharge delays 10% reduction in length of stay of

patients

Lee Walker 29/04/2015

20/06/2015

4. On track

Simplified TTOs received push back from various stakeholders. This

was taken to EQB w/c 4/5

Update on 12/5/15: No decision taken at EQB. Providing further

information for group to be able to make decision

Update 14/05: further conversations with UHL MD and exploring

possibility of redesigning digital layout of TTO form

Update 26/5: template being trialled on AMUUHL-AMB6 Trial AMB score on CDU Catherine Free 01/05/2015

5. CompleteAMB score trialled for one day on CDU. 8 patients seen, or which 7

were seen, treated and discharged within 4 hours.

UHL-AMU3 Introduce EDIS as a discharge tool on SSU to decrease transfer delays from AMU Increase in the proportion of

discharges between 8am and 12pm

Lee Walker 11/05/2015

5. Complete

EDIS now live. Awaiting log in details for staff, training and process for

transfer (pull from SSU vs push from AMU)

Update on 12/5/15: EDIS live and staff have log in profiles. Meeting

booked with flow coordinator manager to discuss transfer process.

UHL-AMU2 Refine escalation policy for AMU as part of the whole hospital response to improve flow

through department

Increase the proportion of GP bed

referrals going directly to AMU to

70%

Lee Walker 27/05/20152. Significant delay –

unlikely to be

completed as planned

Escalation policy is in draft form - to be shared with AMU staff at flow

workshop on 9/6. Will be ready for EQSG sign off following this.

UHL-AMU7 Implement Ambulance/Transport service to convey GP referrals that need to attend within 1

hour of GP request for transport to increase the utilisation of the AMC

Increase the proportion of GP bed

referrals going directly to AMU to

70%

Julie Dixon 13/05/20152. Significant delay –

unlikely to be

completed as planned

Trial of UHL ambulance crew bringing in GP referral patients

unsuccessful due to requirement for technical crews. Discussions with

EMAS revealed issue to be with GP understanding of criteria. Will aim

to address at GP Event on 23/6

UHL-AMU1 Improve the discharge process on AMU and utilisation of AMC to reduce the time from bed

request to bed allocation

Time from bed request to bed

allocation/Time from decision to

discharge to discharge

Lee Walker 24/06/2015

4. On Track

Initial flow workshop held - next workshop scheduled for 19/5/15.

Focus is on Junior Doctor working practices, nurse co-ordinator role,

therapy input.

Update 26/5: Second flow workshop held - Junior Doctor handbook

updated, nurse coordinator role clarified, communication sent to

Senior Registrars regarding decision making overnight, feedback of

successful therapies trial on AMU. Next workshop schedule 9/6 to

include update on sitting patients out and AMU escalation plan

UHL-AMU4 Decrease LoS on SSU by 10% to increase throughput of patients through unit (Baseline LoS

2.8 days)

10% reduction in length of stay of

patients

Lee Walker 24/06/20154. On Track

SSU pathway updated to exclude Dementia patients.

Action

reference

number

Actions KPI trajectoryAction lead within the

organisation

Delivery date /

Next ReviewDelivery Status

Comments on delivery of the action, where closed what

follow up actions are required

UHL-AMU5 Improve BB processes to reduce the proportion of GP referrals going directly to ED Increase the proportion of GP bed

referrals going directly to AMU to

70%

Julie Dixon 27/06/2015

4. On track

Session between GPs and Acute Physicians being organised to

communicate current services and assess need for alternate services

UHL-AMU8 Recruit to two Consultant vacancies on Acute Medical rota to ensure consistent 7 day early

morning Consultant cover to facilitate morning discharges

Increase in the proportion of

discharges between 8am and 12pm

Lee Walker 15/07/2015

1. Not yet commenced

UHL-BW8 Review bed bureau processes to reduce discharge-delays Reduce Los by 10% Julie Dixon 30/05/20154. On track

Engagement with community providers in place

UHL-BW2 Increase the accuracy of recorded discharge time to capture and encourage early discharges Increase in the proportion of

discharges between 8am and 12pm

Ian Lawrence 30/06/20152. Significant delay –

unlikely to be

completed as planned

This impacts upon BW1-3. Need more clarity as to next steps.

UHL-BW3 Implement "real-time bed state-'light' " to capture and encourage early discharges Increase in the proportion of

discharges between 8am and 12pm

Jane Edyvean 30/06/20152. Significant delay –

unlikely to be

completed as planned

This impacts upon BW1-3. Need more clarity as to next steps.

UHL-BW4 Implement the 'home first' principle to reduce discharge delays Reduce number of patients with

length of stay greater than 10 days

Julie Dixon 30/06/20154. On track

Being achieved through D2A work and conference calls. Also ties in

with proposed frailty stream.

UHL-BW5 Review internal processes (including discharge 2 assess) to reduce discharge delays due to

internal processes

Reduce number of patients with

length of stay greater than 10 days

Julie Dixon 30/06/2015

4. On track

Diagnostic completed. D2A process now being shortened.

UHL-BW6 Increase the availability of blood results by the end of the ward round to reduce discharge

delays

Reduce number of patients with

length of stay greater than 10 days

Julie Dixon 30/06/20152. Significant delay –

unlikely to be

completed as planned

Budget issues.

UHL-BW7 Increase the proportion of nurse-delegated or therapy-delegated discharge at the weekend

to 50 % to reduce length of stay

Reduce Los by 10% Maria McAuley 30/06/20154. On track

Nurse delegated discharge pilot in progress on ward 37 with good

clinical engagement.

UHL-BW9 Review transport booking process to reduce discharge delays Reduce number of patients with

length of stay greater than 10 days

Increase in the proportion of

discharges between 8am and 12pm

Julie Dixon 30/06/2015

4. On track

Quick wins with transport process.

UHL-BW1 Every base ward to have 3 junior doctors per ward at 8am to facilitate one stop wards rounds

and early discharges

Increase in the proportion of

discharges between 8am and 12pm

Ian Lawrence 01/08/20154. On track

Shift in start times to achieve this.

UHL-BW10 Review nursing staff cover and processes to provide safe and efficient care Reduce number of patients with

length of stay greater than 10 days

Maria McAuley 30/06/20154. On track

UHL-ED3 Review ED process delays through monthly journey meetings to identify causal factors Patients with decision for onward

care within 120 minutes

95% patients seen within 4 hours

Julie Dixon 01/05/2015

6. Complete and regular

review

First journey meeting held on 21/05. Next one scheduled for 04/06.

In process of agreeing best framework for holding the sessions.

UHL-ED11 Co-design with ED staff a process for having (?hourly) Situational Awareness updates from all

ED areas to help with timely escalation

95% patients seen within 4 hours Ben Teasdale 28/05/20152. Significant delay –

unlikely to be

completed as planned

This was part launched on 23/05. Further work needs to be done to

embed new process. Meeting set up with A&E Trackers on 05/06.

UHL-ED1 Work with EMAS and CCGs to introduce CAD+ as the sole data set to monitor ambulance

handovers

Ambulance Handover - Hours Lost Rachel Williams 30/05/2015

4. On track

11/05:

Successfully trialled iPads and ordered those required

Identified A&E staff who would be holders of the iPads

Continuing with implementation

13/05:

Go live confirmed for 01 Jun as CoWs will be used whilst computers

on order. Staff training beginning 18/05. Connection fixed in Ops

Room.UHL-ED6 Eliminate IT delays between visibility of results in imaging and in ED to reduce delays in

decision making

Patients with decision for onward

care within 120 minutes

95% patients seen within 4 hours

John Clarke 30/05/2015

4. On track

Confirmed to IT that ED should be able to see unverified images.

Awaiting confirmation that this is now in place. Further work to be

done to understand the driver behind delays in seeing Reports. Also

running pilot with Imaging to look at benefit from an exclusive ED CT

scannerUHL-ED8 Analyse data to determine the optimal opening hours for ED Minors and develop action plan

if changes are required to improve patient flow

Patients with decision for onward

care within 120 minutes

Ben Teasdale 15/06/2015

4. On track

Initial analysis completed using the Simulation Tool. In process of

agreeing a small trial of different operating hours based on results

UHL-ED10 Map out EDU processes to understand areas of opportunity for improving flow through the

unit. Numbers through unit were an average of 820 per month (Mar 14 - Feb 15)

Patients with decision for onward

care within 120 minutes

95% patients seen within 4 hours

Mark Williams 30/06/2015

4. On track

Working on First Fits, Toxicology and Headache/Neurology pathways

Aim to present business case for additional pharmacy support mid

May

Need to confirm with CMG as to status of getting additional Monitors

Action

reference

number

Actions KPI trajectoryAction lead within the

organisation

Delivery date /

Next ReviewDelivery Status

Comments on delivery of the action, where closed what

follow up actions are required

UHL-ED12 Look at each stream within the ED separately to determine if their independent staffing

patterns can cope with 85 percentile of activity (including number of staff, skill mix and rotas)

to increase robustness of staffing cover

Patients with decision for onward

care within 120 minutes

95% patients seen within 4 hours

Ben Teasdale 30/06/2015

4. On track

Looked at raw data from 2012-2014 to define 85 per centile of

demand. Will now input into Simulation Tool

UHL-ED13 Work with EMAS and UCC to improve patient information (signage / meet & greet). Improve

time to pain relief.

Rachel Williams 30/06/20151. Not yet commenced

UHL-ED14 Analyse patterns and reasons for UCC late referrals to inform solutions Patients with decision for onward

care within 120 minutes

95% patients seen within 4 hours

Ben Teasdale 30/06/2015

4. On track

20/05 - Agreed at EQSG that will start taking any late referrals for

discussion at weekly meeting with UCC

UHL-ED4 Identify and plan next 5 priority areas based on learnings from Journey Meetings to reduce

delays in ED processes

Patients with decision for onward

care within 120 minutes

95% patients seen within 4 hours

Ben Teasdale 30/06/2015

1. Not yet commenced

UHL-ED5 Trial iPorter in ED with a view to permanent implementation to reduce portering delays Patients with decision for onward

care within 120 minutes

95% patients seen within 4 hours

Ben Teasdale 30/06/2015

4. On track

Trial finished for 8am - 8pm. Interserve working up options of how

this can be done on a permanent basis and extended to cover nights.

Data from the trial is being analysed to understand ED portering

demand profile

UHL-ED9 Investigate impact of inappropriate ED referrals by improving consistency of EDIS data

capture with a view to reducing inappropriate referrals

10% reduction in ED attendances Ben Teasdale 31/08/20151. Not yet commenced

UHL-ED2 Use insight gained from analysis of EMAS / ED Auditors data to further reduce handover

delays between EMAS and ED. Data from the Mar audit found average (max) handover times

of:

EMAS - 22 (59)

ED - 14 (49)

Ambulance Handover - Hours Lost Rachel Williams 15/09/2015

4. On track

13/05 - Assessment Bay Action Plan presented at EQSG

Assessment Bay auditors will begin monitoring compliance with the

SOP from 25/05

26/05 - Medical lead for Assessment Bay identified

UHL-ED7 Work with each area in the ED to reduce time from bed allocation to departure from

department

95% patients seen within 4 hours Ben Teasdale 30/09/2015

4. On track

Requested data on current performance - by ED area - against time

from allocation to departure

UHL-GGH5 Ensure there is PCC (primary care coordinator) support at Glenfield to match AMU at LRI CDU occupancy to remain below 35

at 95% of the time

Sam Leak 13/05/20154. On track

Awaiting discussion at UCB

UHL-GGH1 Review nursing rotas and working practices to ensure that patients are triaged within 15

minutes

95% of patients to be triaged within

15 minutes

Lisa Graham 03/06/2015

4. On track

Work in progress.

UHL-GGH2 Design a robust system to ensure that patients receive clinical assessment within 60 minutes 95% of patients to receive clinical

assessment within 60 minutes

Catherine Free 03/06/20154. On track

Options to be presented at EQSG around optimal staffing based on

modelling work

UHL-GGH3 Design a robust system to deliver cardiology consultant review within 14 hours to 95% of

patients

95% of patients to receive senior

(consultant) review within 14 hours

Jan Kovac 03/06/2015

2. Significant delay –

unlikely to be

completed as planned

Work commencing around job plans

UHL-GGH4 Design a robust system to deliver respiratory consultant review within 14 hours to 95% of

patients

95% of patients to receive senior

(consultant) review within 14 hours

Kim Ryanna 03/06/2015

4. On track

Work commencing around job plans

UHL-GGH10 Increase numbers of monitored cardiology beds in base wards CDU occupancy to remain below 35

at 95% of the time

Jan Kovac 30/06/2015 2. Significant delay –

unlikely to be

completed as planned

Need cardiology consultant engagement

UHL-GGH6 Improve computer access and reduce overcrowding in CDU to reduce delays 95% of patients to be assessed by

doctor within 60 minutes

Kim Ryanna 30/06/20154. On track

New equipment installation authorised and pending (included in

service improvement costs)

UHL-GGH8 Develop SLA with CSI to optimise therapy cover in CDU to reduce discharge delays CDU occupancy to remain below 35

at 95% of the time

Jodie Billings 30/06/20154. On track

Wider therapy recruitment issues to address

Action

reference

number

Actions KPI trajectoryAction lead within the

organisation

Delivery date /

Next ReviewDelivery Status

Comments on delivery of the action, where closed what

follow up actions are required

UHL-GGH9 Improve imaging access to match AMU /AFU to reduce discharge delays 90% of plain films to be turned

around in 30 minutes & 60 minutes

out-of-hours (Feasilbilty of 90% of

CT's to be scanned and reported in 1

hour TBC)

Dan Barnes/Cathy Lea 30/06/20152. Significant delay –

unlikely to be

completed as planned

Need clarity on CT utilisation going forwards

UHL-GGH7 Improve pharmacy support for CDU out-of-hours, to reduce discharge delays CDU occupancy to remain below 35

at 95% of the time

Bhavisha Pattani 01/07/20154. On track

Better out of hours cover and pharmacy packs being finalised

UHL-WHR3 Define on call competencies for Whole Hospital Response roles and self assess current state

to inform escalation training

95% patients seen within 4 hours Julie Dixon 19/06/2015

4. On track

Created draft list of competencies & working to refine plus create

training plan to support any identified gaps

Doing a read across with the competencies expected for Major

Incident management

UHL-WHR4 Hold escalation scenario training for X% (?80%) of relevant staff to reduce variability in

response

95% patients seen within 4 hours Julie Dixon 19/06/2015

4. On track

Confirmed date and initial invites sent

Agreed split between Escalation and Major Incident focus

Working to develop agenda & specific scenarios to be presented at

the event

UHL-WHR10 Create rapid bed turnaround (cleaning) team to reduce time from bed request to bed

allocation

Time from bed request to bed

allocation within 30 minutes

Julie Dixon 30/06/20154. On track

In process of designing team job spec to discuss with Interserve

UHL-WHR2 Complete "ED Road Tour" to improve links between specialties and ED and promote

understanding of 'Exit Block'

95% patients seen within 4 hours

Specialties responding to consult /

bed requests within 30 minutes

Julie Dixon 30/06/2015

1. Not yet commenced

UHL-WHR6 Design and implement a robust management framework for monitoring & addressing actions

taken when on escalation to ensure consistent, timely response

95% patients seen within 4 hours Julie Dixon 30/06/2015

4. On track

Proposal to pilot new Operational Meeting structure and link with

Trust wide work being led to introduce Safety Huddles across all

Wards

RM to speak with Heads of Ops about piloting

UHL-WHR8 Explore use of anaesthetists to support airways instead of ITU 95% patients seen within 4 hours

Specialties responding to consult /

bed requests within 30 minutes

TBC 30/06/2015

5. Complete

At the present moment, the pressure on ITU & Anaesthetics is such

that this is not a viable option. The ED propose that this action is now

replaced with the Trust exploring option of investing in ACPs

UHL-WHR9 Look into improving efficiency during handover times 95% patients seen within 4 hours

Specialties responding to consult /

Julie Dixon 30/06/20154. On track

UHL-WHR5 Work with specialties to update their whole hospital response and design role cards to

improve confidence / consistency in performing escalation protocols

95% patients seen within 4 hours Julie Dixon 31/07/2015

1. Not yet commenced

UHL-WHR1 Work with key specialties to improve the referral process when ED is an appropriate route

and reduce numbers of patients which are inappropriately sent via ED

95% patients seen within 4 hours

Specialties responding to consult /

Julie Dixon 01/08/20151. Not yet commenced

UHL-WHR7 Put in place new protocols to monitor adherence to outlier criteria to ensure that actions

taken during escalation do not compromise patient experience and lead to sustainable

performance the following day

95% patients seen within 4 hours Julie Dixon 30/08/2015

4. On track

Meeting in place with Heather Leathem to discuss how to take this

forward.

UHL-WHR11 Introduce iPorter across the Trust to reduce portering delays 95% patients seen within 4 hours Julie Dixon 01/09/2015

1. Not yet commenced

Will review post trial of iPorter in ED and the introduction of the new

version of iPorter in June/July which may be iPad compatible

Urgent Care Board - DashboardUpdated to Sunday 17/05/2015

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

| |

Information

New Metric added - Number of Re-Beds (Arriva Aborts) Latest Week meets the Target

GP OOH - Received up until 3rd May 2015 Latest Week is within 5% of the Target

Avoidable Emergency Admissions data will show sudden decrease due to the data provided. This normally corrects itself each week Latest Week is > 5% from the Target

30 Day and 90 Readmissions data will show sudden decrease due to the data provided. This normally corrects itself each week

3 New pages have been added: 111 and 999, AE Interface, and Additional Discharge - covering new Metrics. All Metrics are shown Weekly with the Year Running from 1st April

DischargeFlowInflow

GP OOH Activity ED: LRI AttendancesED: UCC

Attendances

UHL Emergency

Admissions

GP Referrals to Bed Bureau

that are Diverted to ED

% of UHL Emergency Admissions

that were Avoidable

111 Total Calls% of 111 Calls sent

to 999/ED

Total Calls

to EMAS

EMAS Disposition

- Non Conveyed

EMAS Ambulance

Handover: Hours Lost

LPT Delayed Transfer of Care -

Bed Days Lost

Community Beds

Open

LPT

Discharges

UHL Discharges

against Admissions

30 Day

Readmission

Rate

% of LPT Discharged to

Admitting Address

UHL Delayed Transfer of Care

- Bed Days Lost

% of LPT Delayed

Transfer of Care

% of UHL Delayed Transfer of

Care

% of UHL & UCC

Attendances seen

within 4 Hours

% of UHL ED with Decision about

Onward Care within 120 mins

% of UHL Ward Response

to ED/Bed Requests within 30

mins

% of UHL GP Referrals

Direct to AMU

UHL Discharges

% of UHL Discharged to

Admitting Address

UHL Empty Beds at

Start of Day on

AMU Ward

% of UHL wards Achieving Targeted

Weekly Discharges

Aged 75+ with Length of Stay

>10 Days at UHL

% of Discharges before

12pm at UHL

Urgent Care Board - Dashboard Created by GEM Leicestershire Spoke - Commissioning Intelligence - Page 1

Updated to Sunday 17/05/2015

INFLOW

111 Total Calls % of 111 Calls sent to 999/ED Total Calls to EMAS

Current Wk Current Wk Current Wk

3,484 9.9% 2,390

2015/16 AVG 2015/16 AVG 2015/16 AVG

3,755 9.1% 2,406

EMAS Disposition Non EMAS Ambulance Handover: Hours Lost GP OOH Activity

Conveyed Conveyed

Current Wk Current Wk

52.4% 47.6% 286 1,975

2015/16 AVG 2015/16 AVG

52.6% 47.4% 265 2,153

ED: LRI Attendances ED: UCC Attendances UHL Emergency Admissions

Current Wk Current Wk Current Wk

3,210 2,051 1,497

2015/16 AVG 2015/16 AVG 2015/16 AVG

3,036 2,074 1,613

GP Referrals to Bed Bureau that are Diverted to ED % of UHL Emergency Admissions that were Avoidable

Current Wk Current Wk

275 3.6%

2015/16 AVG 2015/16 AVG

249 11.4%

All Metrics are shown Weekly with the Year Running from 1st April

Current Wk

2015/16 AVG

2,400

2,900

3,400

3,900

4,400

4,900

5,400

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

5

7

9

11

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

2,300

2,500

2,700

2,900

3,100

3,300

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

0

120

240

360

480

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 5140

45

50

55

60

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

150

200

250

300

350

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

0

5

10

15

20

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

1,200

1,300

1,400

1,500

1,600

1,700

1,800

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

1800

2000

2200

2400

2600

2800

3000

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

3

8

1 2 3 4 5

Target

Last Year

Actual

Urgent Care Board - Dashboard Created by GEM Leicestershire Spoke - Commissioning Intelligence - Page 2

Updated to Sunday 17/05/2015

FLOW

% of UHL and UCC Attendances seen within 4 Hours % of UHL ED with Decision about Onward Care within 120 mins % of UHL Ward Response to ED/Bed Requests within 30 mins

Current Wk Current Wk Current Wk

86.0% 31.5% 66.1%

2015/16 AVG 2015/16 AVG 2015/16 AVG

91.4% 32.7% 66.8%

% of UHL GP Referrals Direct to AMU UHL Empty Beds at Start of Day on AMU Ward % of UHL Wards Achieving Targeted Weekly Discharges [Target = 90%]

Current Wk Current Wk

40.9% 2.1

2015/16 AVG 2015/16 AVG

46.1% 5.2

Patients aged 75+ with Length of Stay >10 days at UHL % Discharges before 12pm at UHL

Current Wk Current Wk

1,392 11.2%

2015/16 AVG 2015/16 AVG

1,325 10.3%

All Metrics are shown Weekly with the Year Running from 1st April

70

80

90

100

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

7

17

27

37

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

0

20

40

60

80

100

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

40

60

80

100

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

0

20

40

60

80

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

3

8

1 2 3 4 5

Target

Last Year

Actual

0

5

10

15

20

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

Urgent Care Board - Dashboard Created by GEM Leicestershire Spoke - Commissioning Intelligence - Page 3

Updated to Sunday 17/05/2015

DISCHARGES

UHL Discharges against Admissions UHL Discharges LPT Discharges

ADM DIS

Current Wk Current Wk

1,497 1,500 1,500 212

2015/16 AVG 2015/16 AVG

1,613 1,611 1,611 278

UHL Delayed Transfers of Care LPT Delayed Transfers of Care % of UHL Discharged to Admitting Address

Current Wk Current Wk Current Wk

1.7% 7.8% 89.0%

2015/16 AVG 2015/16 AVG 2015/16 AVG

1.1% 9.5% 89.0%

% of LPT Discharged to Admitting Address Community Beds UHL Delayed Transfers of Care - Bed Days Lost

Current Wk Current Wk Current Wk

78.5% 16 27

2015/16 AVG 2015/16 AVG 2015/16 AVG

67.7% 10 40

LPT Delayed Transfers of Care - Bed Days Lost 30 Day Readmission Rate

Current Wk Current Wk

175 29

2015/16 AVG 2015/16 AVG

251 123

All Metrics are shown Weekly with the Year Running from 1st April

Current Wk

2015/16 AVG

1,500

1,600

1,700

1,800

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

1250

1450

1650

1850

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

40

50

60

70

80

90

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

20

70

120

170

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

0

100

200

300

400

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

80

180

280

380

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

0.0

5.0

10.0

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 5380

85

90

95

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

0

100

200

300

400

500

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

0

5

10

15

20

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

3

8

1 2 3 4 5

Target

Last Year

Actual

Urgent Care Board - Dashboard Created by GEM Leicestershire Spoke - Commissioning Intelligence - Page 3

Updated to Sunday 17/05/2015

111 or 999

% of Dispositon of 111 Calls % of Disposition from Out of Hours

Time Profile of Out of Hours Utilisation % of Disposition of EMAS Calls

All Metrics are shown Weekly with the Year Running from 1st April

3

8

1 2 3 4 5

Target

Last Year

Actual

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52

Other

Sent to Other Service

Sent to ED

Emergency Ambulance

Not Recommended to any

ServiceSent to

Primary/Community Care

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

Base Visit

Advice

Home Visit

0

50

100

150

200

00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Last Week

Current Week

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

Conveyed to ED

See and Treat

Hear and Treat

Conveyed to UCC

Urgent Care Board - Dashboard Created by GEM Leicestershire Spoke - Commissioning Intelligence - Page 3

Updated to Sunday 17/05/2015

AE Interface

% of Outcome at LRI UCC Time Profile of LRI UCC Attendances % of LRI UCC Triaged within 20 minutes

Resolved Referred

Current Wk

55.6% 44.4% 96.2%

2015/16 AVG

56.1% 43.9% 97.5%

% of Transfers from LRI UCC to LRI ED Time Profile of UHL AE Attendances UHL Admissions with Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions

Current Wk Current Wk

40.1% 17

2015/16 AVG 2015/16 AVG

39.8% 87

UHL AE HRG Categories of Treament Last Week This Week % of AE VB11Z: No investigation with no significant treatment

VB01Z: Any investigation with category 5 treatment 12 3 6

VB02Z: Category 3 investigation with category 4 treatment 61 46 6 Current Wk

VB03Z: Category 3 investigation with category 1-3 treatment 177 187 5 3.6%VB04Z: Category 2 investigation with category 4 treatment 241 231 6

VB05Z: Category 2 investigation with category 3 treatment 87 101 5 2015/16 AVG

VB06Z: Category 1 investigation with category 3-4 treatment 73 85 5 4.9%

VB07Z: Category 2 investigation with category 2 treatment 509 531 5

VB08Z: Category 2 investigation with category 1 treatment 761 858 5

VB09Z: Category 1 investigation with category 1-2 treatment 915 933 5

VB11Z: No investigation with no significant treatment 197 232 5

NULL 3 5

The above chart will be removed in the next report if all agree, as explaining

each Category would require Clinical input. There is greater interest in the

HRG VB11Z Chart that is shown to the right.

All Metrics are shown Weekly with the Year Running from 1st April

Current Wk

2015/16 AVG

0

50

100

150

00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Last Week

Current Week

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

3

8

1 2 3 4 5

Target

Last Year

Actual

92

94

96

98

100

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

20

30

40

50

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

0

50

100

150

200

250

00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Last Week

Current Week

0

2

4

6

8

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

20

70

120

170

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

Urgent Care Board - Dashboard Created by GEM Leicestershire Spoke - Commissioning Intelligence - Page 3

Updated to Sunday 17/05/2015

Additional Discharge

Time Profile of UHL EM Discharges 90 Day Readmission Rate Number of Re-Beds (Arriva Aborts)

Current Wk Current Wk

51 12

2015/16 AVG 2015/16 AVG

210 9

All Metrics are shown Weekly with the Year Running from 1st April

0

50

100

150

200

250

00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Last Week

Current Week

3

8

1 2 3 4 5

Target

Last Year

Actual

0

100

200

300

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

0

5

10

15

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51


Recommended