+ All Categories
Home > Documents > University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare...

University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare...

Date post: 29-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: imogene-bradley
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
38
University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013 Stephen T. Parente, Ph.D. Carlson School of Management, Department of Finance
Transcript
Page 1: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

University of Minnesota

Medical Technology Evaluation and Market

Research Department of Healthcare Management

Course: MILI/PUBH 6589Spring Semester, 2013Stephen T. Parente, Ph.D.

Carlson School of Management, Department of Finance

Page 2: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Class OverviewMeasuring Effectiveness

Health state 101

Specifying clinical outcomes

Measuring outcomes

Use of decision trees in effectiveness analysis

Page 3: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Terminology: “Health State”

““The health of an The health of an individual at any individual at any

particular point in time.” particular point in time.”

[Gold et al 1996]

Page 4: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

When Considering an Assessment of Health: Two

areas of concern• Length of life

– mortality rates– life expectancy

• Quality of life– ability/disability– independence– other aspects of health & well-being

Page 5: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

1. quality of life

2. combination of quality & length

We need measurement scales for

What do we mean by “measurement” of outcomes?

Page 6: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Measurement• Process of setting up a correspondence

between

–Some set of things (here health states)

–Numbers

• So that qualitative relations among the things (such as “better than”) are reflected by the quantitative numerical relationships

Page 7: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Some differences in scales matter; some don’t

A No pain at all 0 10 0B A little pain 1 20 0.5C Painful 2 30 2D Hurts like hell 3 40 20

Pain ratings from 6 people: A,B,B,B,C,D

Averages on 3 different scales:

1.33 23.33 3.92

Page 8: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Goal of health outcome measurement

• Assign scales so that when we do arithmetic, the averages work out the way we think they should.

• Use common vales to permit apples to apples comparison.

Page 9: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

How about a single measure that combines morbidity & mortality?

• Simple idea:

Weight each year of life with a measure of degree of good/poor health.

Add up the weighted life years.

Page 10: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

DeadDead

ExcellentExcellent

Ove

rO

ver

all

all

Healt

Healt

hhQu

ali

Qu

ali

tyty

additional years of lifeadditional years of lifenownow deathdeath

QALYs = area under this curve QALYs = area under this curve QALE = average number of QALYs QALE = average number of QALYs experiencedexperienced by a cohort by a cohort of the same starting age and quality of lifeof the same starting age and quality of life = best estimate of future health-adjusted life years for = best estimate of future health-adjusted life years for random member of the cohortrandom member of the cohort

““Life Path” = the Life Path” = the general health general health outcomeoutcome

Page 11: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Mathematical Assumption to make QALY tractable:

• “Q” weighting is separable from duration of the health state it represents and other health states in the life path

– simplifies data collection immensely!– Life expectancy obtained from

medical data– combined mathematically instead of

by judgment

Page 12: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Issues ...• What aspects of “health” are

normally covered in a health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measure?

• How is a health classification system operationalized?

• How are numbers (weights) assigned to health states?

Page 13: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Illustrate with several different measures

• QWB Quality of Well-being scale• HUI Health Utility Index• YHL measure in Years of Healthy

Life• EQ-5D EuroQol health status

measure• SF-36 Questionnaire-based health

profile

Page 14: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

DeadDead

ExcellentExcellent

Overall Overall HRQOLHRQOL

additional years of lifeadditional years of lifenownow deathdeath

Continuum of health state weights

Page 15: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

DeathDeath

ExcellentExcellent

Overall Overall HealthHealth

Descriptionsystem covering allhealth states

Numericalscale

Function corresponding states to scale values so arithmetic “works”

Health Status Measurement System

Page 16: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

“The health of an individual at any

particular point in time.” • Things “health” might include ...

– Functional abilities? Which ones?– Pain?– Other?

“Dimensions” of Health

Page 17: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Typical Concepts & Domains

• Health Perceptions• Social Function

– Soc. relations– role function– intimacy– communication

• Impairment– sensory

function/loss– symptoms

• Psychological Funct.– Cognitive– emotional– mood/feelings

• Physical Function– mobility– physical activity– self-care

Page 18: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

F ig u re 1 . A P oss ib le H ie ra rch ica l V iew o f H ea lth D im en s ion s

S e lf-p erce ived(se lf-ra ted )

H ea lth

M ob ility

D a ilyac tivit ies

P h ys ica lF u n c tion

w ithF am ily & F rien d s

M ajo r L ifeR o le

R ec rea tion

S oc ia l/R o leF u n c tion

M em ory

P rob lemS o lvin g

C og n it iveF u n c tion

A b ility toF u n c tion

P a in

E n erg y/V ita lity

H ap p in essM ood

D ep ress ion /A n xie ty

S e lf Im ag e

E m otion a l

V is ion

H earin g

S en sory

E xis ten tia l/E xp erien tia l

S ym p tom s &C ap ab ilit ies

O vera ll H ea lth

A Hierarchy of Health Dimensions

Page 19: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Health states are multidimensional

• Measure as vector

–one number for each dimension

• Create one summary number

Page 20: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

• State 1

– intermittent moderate pain– no mobility limitations– able to do normal socio-occup.

functions• State 2

– continuous mild pain– mobility limitation– some occupational restrictions

Example

Page 21: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Profile (“vector”) representationProfile (“vector”) representation1. Decide what dimensions

2. Develop scales for each dimension

3. Develop process for locating patients on each dimension

PF SF PA = (70, 30, 50)B = (55, 60, 90)

Physical Function

Social Function

Pain

A

B

Page 22: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Single number (“scalar”) representation:

1. Same steps as for a profile

+2. Develop process for aggregating the attributes into one summary number.

OR

Just do direct aggregate scaling

100

65

45

0

State B

State A

Perfect health

dead

Page 23: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Example classification scheme: YHL

Self-rated health

Excel. VGood Good Fair Poor

none

limited. in “other” activities

limited in major activity

cannot do major activity

need help in IADLs

need help in ADLSs

Fu

ncti

on

al

ab

ilit

y

Page 24: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Example classification scheme: YHL

Self-rated health

Limits:Excel. VGood Good Fair Poor

none

ltd. in “other”activities

ltd. in majoractivitycannot do majoractivity

need help inIADLs

need help inADLSs

5 levels of self-rating x

6 levels of function

= 30 health states

An intermediate health stateBest Worst

Page 25: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Self-rated health

Limits:Excel. VGood Good Fair Poor

none

ltd. in “other”activities

ltd. in majoractivitycannot do majoractivity

need help inIADLs

need help inADLSs

An intermediate health stateBest Worst

Scaling the Health States:

1.0

Dead

0.0? ?

Page 26: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Self-rated health

Excel. VGood Good Fair Poor

none 1.0 0.92 0.84 0.63 0.47

limited. in“other” activities

0.87 0.79 0.72 0.52 0.38

limited in majoractivity

0.81 0.74 0.67 0.48 0.34

cannot do majoractivity

0.68 0.62 0.55 0.38 0.25

need help inIADLs

0.57 0.51 0.45 0.29 0.17

need help inADLSs

0.47 0.41 0.36 0.21 0.10

Weights for YHLF

un

ctio

nal

ab

ilit

y

Note: “dead” = 0.00

Page 27: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Definitions …..

• HALYs: health-adjusted life years using a health status measure for health weights

– QALYs: quality-adjusted life years

… a type of HALY computed using a HRQOL measure for health weights.

Page 28: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Disease Specific General Health

non-preference

physical measures

Many! e.g.

joint countstotal cholesterol

--

rating scales

Many!

SIP, Rand GHS, COOP, MOS short forms EVGFP

preference based

indexed ?

QWB, HUI, EQ-5D,YHL?

patient’s own prefs. ad hoc ad hoc

Page 29: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Disease-specific instruments

• Very specific to intended effects of treatments

• Can be sensitive to small changes in disease activity/status

• Clinicians can link to specific actions

Page 30: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

But disease-specific measures may miss things

• Many treatments have unintended effects (arthritis & hearing)

• Many people (especially when older) have multiple health conditions (median number is 3) ...

Page 31: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Why an interest in measures of General Health?

(aka “generic measures”)

• Allows many comparisons:– across diseases– in people with multiple conditions– across studies

• Needed for cost-effectiveness studies

Page 32: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Medical Outcomes Study -- “short forms”

• Derived from Rand General Health Survey• Originally 250+ questions• Published short forms that are in use:

– SF-12– SF-20– SF-36

Page 33: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

SF-36• 8 components, scaled worst=0 to

best=100Physical functioningRole function (from physical limitation)PainGeneral Health Perception Mental healthVitalitySocial functioningRole function (from emotional limitation)Mental health

Page 34: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

New Scaling for SF-36 & SF-12

• PCS : physical component scale

• MCS: mental component scale

Page 35: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Two web sites for SF-36

• http://www.sf-36.org/demos/SF-36.html

• http://www.sf-36.org/images/maruishslide1.jpg

Page 36: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

Decision Tree Overview: Movement Across Health States Over Time

Page 37: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.
Page 38: University of Minnesota Medical Technology Evaluation and Market Research Department of Healthcare Management Course: MILI/PUBH 6589 Spring Semester, 2013.

What’s Next?

• Break

• Technology Evaluation Roundtable

• Projects


Recommended