University of Oxford Department for Continuing Education
From Civilisation To Barbarism? Western Britain in the Early
Middle Ages
Tutor: Dr Kirsten Jarrett
Week Seven: Trade and Technology
How might changing exchange networks have affected technologies - and how might this have
affected identities?
• Economic (systems and) exchange: Trade / exchange & distribution of materials & products
• Technological exchange: skills / knowledge transference • Cultural exchange: shared ideas → adoption of styles (visual ‘code’ / ‘message’ embedding beliefs & identities) or / and shared styles → changing ideas or ‘meanings’
How might the following have affected technologies - and
identities?• Withdrawal of the Roman state / military• Restricted trade / exchange with the Continent &
Mediterranean• Transformation of established transportation
systems / network ‘nodes’ (e.g. closure of roads, abandonment of towns)
• Development of localised and regional power &civil war
• Building technologies: stone → timber – changing skills & materials and / or stylistic influence?
• Metalworking technologies: continuity of some styles, particular to needs of Western Britain? Recycling of materials
• Ceramic technologies: contraction of regional industries (changing superstructure – and markets?). Gradual stylistic & technological changes?
• Food / drink technologies: diet (ingredients, cooking techniques & associated material culture) may be closely related to social identities. Late C5 importation: supply drives or responds to particular ‘tastes’?
What might we learn from metalwork?
• Clothing / personal adornment (e.g. brooches, pins, hobnails)
• Building / manufacturing techniques / styles (e.g. nails & tools)
• Warfare / subsistence / leisure (e.g. weapons, knives)
Style(not necessarily or directly) ≠ ‘ethnic’ or cultural identity
Techniques & Composition:
exchange networks & cultural influence
Bowl furnace
Metalworking
Metalworking moulds and crucible, Dinas Powys
Peripatetic?
Copper alloy casting Techniques:
• Lead model• ‘Cere Perdue’
(Lost Wax)
Champlevé:Cells cast or carved in surface ofField and filled with glass paste,
then fired
Millefiori
Enamel
What might we learn from ceramics?
Techniques – comparable to prehistoric:Handmade (coil-built or ‘pinched’), ‘clamp-fired’ (lower temperatures –softer fabrics: less durable)
Composition: ‘tempers’ & ‘inclusions’Mostly local clays (stream-bank / dug)– but some widerdistributions
Finish: e.g. ‘grass marked’
‘Grass-Tempered’ Pottery‘British’: C5-6?Anglo-Saxon: C5+
• Diet and cooking techniques (vessel forms & food / soot residues)
• Leisure & social / political networks / identities (food / drink in creating / maintaining social ties & obligations)
(p. 13 Booklet)
• Building technologies (daub / fired clay: walls & ovens)
C4+ Ceramic stylesC4+: increasingly ‘Roman’ in Cornwall?
Hand-made pottery:C5 ‘devolution’ of
‘Roman’ styles & influence of Germanic??
C4+ (across west)samian seems
to remain ‘fashionable’ –continued high
status associations?
Imported ceramics:Mediterranean
Amphorae:Late C5-6
North African Red Slipped Ware
Biv/LRA 3N Afr.
c. AD 475-550Phocean Red Slipped Ware
Bii / LRA 1 (Syria)
Imported ceramics:Continental
‘D Ware’: C6-7Bordeux
‘E Ware’: C6-7Gaulish / Frankish
(derivee sigiltee pateochretienne – DSPA)
Trade Routes
Mediterranean & East to Western Britain: late C5 – mid C6
East to eastern Britain:Late C6-C7+
Trading sites
Bantham, Devon
Mothecombe, Devon
Bone, antler, and stone