RESEARCH PAPER
Unsteady pulsating characteristics of the fluid flow througha sudden expansion microvalve
Amir Nejat • Farshad Kowsary •
Amin Hasanzadeh-Barforoushi •
Saman Ebrahimi
Received: 1 August 2013 / Accepted: 16 January 2014
� Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Abstract This paper investigates the unsteady character-
istics of flow in a specific type of microvalve with sudden
expansion shape. The resultant vortex structures cause dif-
ferent flow resistance in forward and backward flow direc-
tions. This may be used in applications such as a microvalve
in micropump system and MEMS-based devices. A time-
varying sinusoidal pressure was set at the inlet of the micro-
channel to produce unsteadiness and simulate the pumping
action. The existence of block obstacle and expansion
shoulders leads to various sizes of vortex structures in each
flow direction. All simulation results are based on the
numerical simulation of two-dimensional, unsteady, incom-
pressible and laminar Navier–Stokes equations. Two funda-
mental parameters were varied to investigate the vortex
growth throughout the time: the frequency of the inlet actu-
ating mechanism (1 Hz B f B 1,000 Hz) and the amplitude
of the inlet pressure. In this way, one can see the effect of
actuation mechanism on the onset of separation and follow
the size and duration of the vortex growth. In order to better
understand the effect of geometry and frequency on flow
field, the pressure and velocity distributions are studied
through one cycle. Strouhal number is calculated for fre-
quency, and a critical value of f = 250 Hz is found for
St = 1. The obtained results provide a deep insight into the
physics of unsteady flow in valveless micropumps and leads
to better use of current design as a part of microfluidic system.
Keywords Valveless microvalves � Unsteady flow �Oscillating sinusoidal pressure � Vortex structures
1 Introduction
In recent years, developments in microfluidic systems have
enormously increased our capability of manipulating the
small amounts of fluids in microscales. Along with these
developments, numerous applications have been proposed
in the fields of medicine, chemical and biological analyses
such as biochemistry, high heat dissipating electronic
cooling, fuel cells and lab-on-a-chip devices (Yeh et al.
2010; Chang et al. 2011; Nabavi 2009; Wang et al. 2006;
Cohen et al. 2005; Amirouche et al. 2009). High sample
throughput, low sample and reagent consumption, and
improved performance as well as reliability are the main
features of microfluidic devices. Furthermore, reduced time
and cost in diagnostic procedure and an improved potential
for integration with other microchips and detection systems
have made microfluidic devices a crucial tool for micro-
flow analysis. One of such systems, for example, a lab-on-
a-chip device, includes many parts such as pump, mixer,
valve and actuators working together in a whole package
(Lin et al. 2012; Sun et al. 2010; Liou et al. 2011; Movahed
and Li 2011; Chung et al. 2004).
In many microfluidic applications, micropumps and
microvalves are used together to achieve a robust fluid flow
control. Micropumps generate volumetric fluid movement
on-chip. However, microvalves are used in the design of
micropumps and have a controlling role (Au et al. 2011).
There are three types of microvalves: active, passive and
valveless (Du et al. 2011; Lee et al. 2008; Loverich et al.
2007; Boustheen et al. 2012). Active microvalves have been
widely used in micropump design as it has easier flow con-
trollability. However, it also has some issues such as larger
size and additional power consumption compared to other
types. Passive microvalves do not have additional power
consumption, but they have lower controllability. For both
A. Nejat (&) � F. Kowsary � A. Hasanzadeh-Barforoushi �S. Ebrahimi
School of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering,
University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
e-mail: [email protected]
123
Microfluid Nanofluid
DOI 10.1007/s10404-014-1343-9
active and passive microvalves, the fatigue of the valve and
the switching control may have some adverse effects on the
pump performance and its reliability. In order to overcome
these problems, valveless micropumps using a valveless
rectifier are introduced (Stemme and Stemme 1993; Van De
Pol 1989).
Two common types of valveless rectifiers are introduced
in the literature: Tesla valve (Truong and Nguyen 2003;
Thompson et al. 2011) and nozzle/diffuser valve (Nabavi and
Mongeau 2009; Yang et al. 2008). The main concept of these
valves is based on the direction-dependent flow resistance. In
Tesla valves, for example, due to different entrance angles of
serpentine side channel, most of the forward flow passes
through the straight channel, but backward flow encounters
more resistance than forward flow. A diffuser structure was
proposed by Forster and Bardell (1995) that had a rectifica-
tion performance equivalent to Tesla valve, and its geometry
was simpler so that it had superiority in design and manu-
facturing. Yang et al. (2006) also reported the performance
of nozzle/diffuser micropumps with parallel and series
combinations. These microfluidic rectifiers have simple
structure as they have no moving parts; however, the lower
rectification performance index limits their applications.
In many cases such as piezoelectric micropumps, the
velocity field is pulsatile and the unsteadiness of the flow
affects the performance of the micropump. Therefore,
investigation of how that oscillation affects the flow field
within the channel seems to be necessary. Several numerical
and experimental studies on unsteady flow through micro-
pumps with different types of microvalves have been
reported (Wang et al. 2007; Sun and Huang 2006; Sheen et al.
2008). Sun and Huang (2006) numerically investigated the
problem of unsteady flow in a microdiffuser using com-
mercial software FLUENT. In their investigation, they
considered two primary parameters, diffuser half-angle and
excitation frequency. They found that the net flow rate was
independent of excitation frequency for f \ 25 Hz but
decreased with increasing frequency for f [ 25 Hz.
Wang et al. (2007) studied the performance of no-mov-
ing-part valves (NMPV) of a diffuser type both numerically
and experimentally under steady and unsteady flow condi-
tions. The diffuser angle was 20� because it leads to better
production of net volume rate. An optimal Strouhal number
(St = xDh/umax) with maximum net volume flow rate was
found at St = 0.013 for unsteady flow conditions. Their
findings showed that the relation between the driving pres-
sure amplitude and the net volume flow is of great impor-
tance in NMPV micropump system.
Recently, formation of recirculation zones in a sudden
expansion channel with rectangular block structure under
steady flow conditions was investigated both numerically
and experimentally by Tsai et al. (2012a, b). They showed
that the Reynolds number and the aspect ratio have a sig-
nificant impact on the sequence of vortex growth down-
stream of the expansion channel. They also draw the
Reynolds number/aspect ratio (Re-c) flow pattern map to
classify how the flow structures vary with Reynolds num-
ber. In another paper, Tsai et al. (2012a, b) introduced a
microfluidic rectifier based on sudden expansion channel
and with an embedded block structure. That structure
induced two vortices at the end of the microchannel under
reverse flow conditions. These vortices reduced the effec-
tive hydraulic diameter of the channel and, therefore,
increased the flow resistance.
In this paper, the flow of a Newtonian fluid within a
valveless micropump is investigated by means of numeri-
cal simulation in order to have a better understanding of the
effects of expansion and contraction on the transient
behavior of the flow. The embedded obstacle (some dis-
tances away from the expansion) helps the growth of the
vortices. As the frequency varies between 1 and 1,000 Hz,
the results can cover many typical micropumping require-
ments, for example, in electronics cooling and in microfuel
cells. The effects of frequency on the onset of flow sepa-
ration and circulation size and duration are investigated in
detail. Strouhal number variations are detected to introduce
different unsteady regimes as a function of frequency
changes of the inlet pressure.
2 Mathematical formulation
Figure 1 represents a schematic illustration of the problem
under investigation. According to Fig. 1, the simulation
domain consists of an inlet, the walls, the block obstacle and
the outlet. The length of inlet, outlet, contraction region and
expansion region are 300, 900, 1,500 and 3,000 lm,
respectively. The obstacle has a height of 300 lm and a
width of 150 lm. A time-varying sinusoidal pressure is
applied at the inlet boundary. The flow is assumed laminar as
the Reynolds number does not exceed 300. Note that Rey-
nolds number is defined as umaxDh
m , where umax is the maximum
streamwise velocity, Dh is the hydraulic diameter of the inlet,
and m is the kinematic viscosity of water.
2.1 Governing equations
In order to analyze the flow within the channel, the gov-
erning equations are simplified using the following
assumptions: (1) The working fluid is an incompressible,
Newtonian fluid which in our case is water with density of
998 kg/m3 and dynamic viscosity of 0.001 kg/ms; (2)
Microfluid Nanofluid
123
constant fluid properties; (3) the gravitational and buoy-
ancy effects are sufficiently small and are ignored; (4) the
flow is unsteady and laminar; and (5) the flow field is two
dimensional. Our 2D analysis seems to provide a reason-
ably realistic simulation due to infinite aspect ratio and
Re� 1 (Tsai et al. 2007). As the simulation is performed
for an unsteady flow, the full 2D Navier–Stokes equations
must be solved. The governing equations are the following:
ou
oxþ ov
oy¼ 0 ð1Þ
qðou
otþ u
ou
oxþ v
ou
oyÞ ¼ � oP
oxþ lðo
2u
ox2þ o2u
oy2Þ ð2Þ
qðov
otþ u
ov
oxþ v
ov
oyÞ ¼ � oP
oyþ lðo
2v
ox2þ o2v
oy2Þ ð3Þ
where q is the fluid density; u and v are velocity
components in x- and y-directions, respectively; P is the
pressure; l is the fluid dynamic viscosity; and t denotes
time. In order to solve the above equations, the flow is
initially assumed stationary so that u(x, y, 0) = 0 and
v(x, y, 0) = 0. Also, no slip boundary condition is applied
at the walls. This is true because the Knudsen number is
very small (i.e., Kn \ 0.01). The Kn number is defined as:
Kn ¼ kL
ð4Þ
where k is the mean free path of molecules and L is the
characteristic length of the channel. For water k is
approximately 2.5 A or 2.5 9 10-10 m and L = 300 lm,
calculating for Kn,
Kn ¼ kL¼ 8:3� 10�7 � 0:01
Therefore, no slip assumption at the wall is satisfied.
There are different types of micropumps according to the
method in which the fluid is flowed. In this paper, we
studied a type of positive displacement micropump design
working under sinusoidal boundary condition for the inlet
and a constant (i.e., atmospheric) pressure at the outlet. In
fact, the fluid flows to a reservoir. Thus, the boundary
conditions are expressed as follows:
Inlet:
Pinlet ¼ P0 � sinð2pftÞ ð5Þ
Outlet:
Poutlet ¼ Patm ¼ 0 ð6Þ
Walls:
u ¼ v ¼ 0 ð7Þ
2.2 Numerical method and computational grid
The COMSOL (multiphysics) software, which is based on
finite-element scheme, was used to discrete and solve the
governing continuity and momentum equations. The sim-
ulations were performed for the frequency range of
1–1,000 Hz and the pressure amplitude varying from
200–500 Pa. Laminar flow and 2D model are used to
perform the simulations. Since the flow is unsteady, the
second-order time marching technique is employed. The
upper band of the time range was chosen in such a way to
resolve variation in flow structures in several consecutive
periods. A time step of 0.02 of a period was taken
accordingly to make sure that all the major velocity scales
are resolved, i.e., the obtained results are not dependent on
the adopted time step. A time-dependent solver is used to
solve the transient equations of motion. There are several
time-stepping methods that can be used. In this paper, we
use the backward differentiation method, which is an
implicit method with linear multisteps and sometimes
called backward differentiation formulas (BDFs). On that
method, an approximation to a derivative of a variable at
time tn is given in terms of its function values information
from already computed times, and thus, the accuracy of
the approximations is enhanced. The time step for different
Fig. 1 Schematic illustration of the microchannel with rectangular obstacle
Microfluid Nanofluid
123
inlet frequencies can be chosen accordingly. As an
example, for f = 100 Hz, we used t = 0.0002 s as time
step, which is two hundredth of the oscillation period. In
order to show the time-step independency of the results,
we performed the simulation for two different time steps.
In fact, we reduced the time step to reach the time-step
independency. We found that making time step equal to
0.02 T or smaller does not cause a tangible difference in
the obtained results for all frequency ranges. Our decision
on time step was based on both being accurate enough to
capture the required vortices on the one hand and time-
step independency on the other hand. Figure 2 represents
the results of time steps 0.02 and 0.01 of the employed
period.
An unstructured grid with triangular mesh elements was
used (Fig. 3). The use of unstructured grid is common in
finite-element analysis and facilitates the mesh generation
(and possible refinement) near the corners and sharp edges.
The number of cells was 19842 with average mesh size of
about 156 lm2, and the maximum and minimum element
sizes were 400 and 1.82 lm2, respectively, with maximum
growth rate of 1.3.
A grid study was performed to examine the sensitivity of
solution to the number of elements. We carried two grid
systems with mesh elements for the case when f = 100 Hz
and P0 = 200 Pa. At the first step, the maximum element
size was decreased from 20 to 15 lm. This caused the total
number of elements to change from 19,842 to 34,912. The
velocity at the point that is 3,000 lm downstream of the
inlet is plotted through time in Fig. 4. It is clear from the
figure that using smaller mesh size does not cause a tan-
gible difference in results.
Model verification is performed to verify the accuracy and
the validity of the numerical method to simulate the unsteady
fluid flow through the microchannel. In the study by Nabavi
(2009), the velocity profiles were obtained for 2D micro-
channel of width 2a and length L with a sinusoidal pressure
gradient of oPox¼ p�eixt and with P = 1,000 Pa, a = 60 lm,
L = 1,000 lm and f = 10 kHz. We adopted these values to
find the evolution of the velocity profiles shown in Fig. 5.
Comparing the computed results with those reported by
Nabavi (2009) demonstrates that our simulation method is
reasonably accurate.
3 Results and discussion
The role of actuation mechanism in the production of
vortex generation and recirculation zones is very important.
A pulsatile pressure boundary condition is set at the inlet of
the channel, meaning if one assumes a single period, in half
of that period the pressure is positive and the flow is
injected into the channel. In the other half of the period, the
Fig. 2 Variation of u_velocity with time for two time steps of a 0.0001 s and b 0.0002 s in case f = 100 Hz
Fig. 3 Schematic drawing of the mesh in the expansion zone
Microfluid Nanofluid
123
pressure becomes negative, meaning that we have suction
at the inlet and the flow is pulled back to the inlet region.
Therefore, we can have both forward and backward flows
with this actuation mechanism through one cycle.
First, we should note that at the first few cycles the
variation in flow rate is non-regulated because of quick
changes in pressure and initial transient behavior of the
flow field. This could be important when accurate manip-
ulation of fluid is needed and when the fluid is sensitive to
pressure changes. We should also note that the number of
non-regulated periods depends highly on the inlet
frequency.
Figure 6a–n represents the evolution of vortices when
the fluid flow gets regulated. This happens after approxi-
mately two to three cycles pass from the initial time
(t = 0), but it varies for different values of the inlet fre-
quency. We tracked the circulations from t = 0.0224 s,
which is three cycles after the initial time. It is seen that the
evolution of vortices repeats every t = 0.01 s as we have
expected from the relation: T = 1/f = 0.01 s. We bring the
results in the time interval t = 0.0244–0.0324, which is
one complete cycle in Fig. 6a–n.
The separation in the flow field takes place for two
reasons: (1) the pulsatile pressure and (2) the shape of the
geometry. As we can see in Fig. 6a–n, at the first few
time steps, the flow field has not been developed yet and
the streamlines are smooth. This situation continues for a
very short time, and the first signs of circulation are seen
at t = 0.22 T (Fig. 6b) at the shoulders of the expansion
region. For the next time steps, the circulation also occurs
at the back of the obstacle. The vortices continue to grow
from this time until the third and forth vortices appear. It
is interesting to know that the forth vortex structure,
which happens when the pressure is negative about
P = -168 Pa (maximum pressure is 200 Pa), is extended
along the side walls of the channel and then at the ter-
minal part of the channel. The vortex growth continues as
far as t = 0.52 T (Fig. 6f) when they collide with each
other, and the flow field reaches its maximum suction.
After the collision of vortices, the sizes of the vortex
regions decrease along with the pressure getting smaller
in magnitude.
It is also important to note that the sizes of the vortices
become smaller and their positions shift into the inlet
region. From t = 0.88 T (Fig. 6j), a strange behavior
happens. Two circulation regions are produced, one at the
shoulders and the other in front of the obstacle. The regions
Fig. 4 The velocity magnitude at the point which is 3,000 lm downstream of the inlet for maximum element size of a 20 lm and b 15 lm
Fig. 5 Velocity profiles obtained for p = 1,000 Pa and f = 10 kHz;
current method (solid lines) and the results of Nabavi et al. (symbols)
Microfluid Nanofluid
123
also grow in such a way that an oblong vortex structure is
produced at the inlet region of the channel behind the step
expansion. However, the vortex structures will be damped
as fast as its production and the flow gain smooth
streamlines at t = T (Fig. 6n). This time is the beginning of
the next cycle.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
(e) (f)
(g) (h)
(i) (j)
(k) (l)
(m) (n)
Fig. 6 Evolution of
recirculation zones for the third
cycle at specified times for
P0 = 200 Pa and f = 100 Hz
Microfluid Nanofluid
123
Figure 7 shows that the instantaneous velocity and the
pressure variations do not have the same phase. This hap-
pens because of the waves produced by pressure oscillation
and the flow inertial effects. In order to detect the unsteady
behavior of the flow, we must let the fluid to flow for some
cycles so that the effect of pressure disturbances will be
damped and the flow gains a regulated sinusoidal periodic
behavior.
3.1 Frequency effects
Flow structure in pulsating micropumps highly depends on the
frequency of the actuation mechanism. It is also important to
note that different applications of micropump demand specific
interval of frequency. As an example in the work done by
Nabavi and Mongeau (2009), the high-frequency pulsating
flow through a diffuser/nozzle element was investigated that
had an application in valveless acoustic micropumps.
In the present study, we investigate the effect of fre-
quency variations on the onset of separation, the pressure
and the velocity contours inside the microchannel. The
range of frequencies is varied from f = 1–1,000 Hz to
investigate the efficiency of this geometry for very low,
medium and high frequencies.
3.1.1 Stream function contours
As noticed in the previous section, when f = 100 Hz, i.e.,
medium frequency, separation occurs when pressure
changes sign. However, when the frequency becomes very
low (f = 1 Hz) or very high (f = 1,000 Hz), a different
situation takes place. In Fig. 8, the streamlines are shown
for six phases of the inlet pressure.
As it is seen in the figure, at high frequencies, which in
our case is f = 1,000 Hz, one key change occurs comparing
to the medium frequency f = 100 Hz. The onset of sepa-
ration will be some time after the midtime of the cycle when
the inlet pressure changes sign and shifts into the times of
maximum and minimum inlet pressure. This means that
increasing the frequency causes a delay in onset of sepa-
ration so that we subsequently expect a delay in vortex
generation. At low frequencies, i.e., f = 1 Hz, however, a
reverse condition is set and flow circulation proceeds and
takes place before the inlet pressure changes sign. The
separation begins at t = 0.02 s for inlet conditions of
f = 1 Hz and P0 = 200 Pa. This is the two hundredth of the
period time. For inlet conditions of f = 100 Hz and
P0 = 200 Pa and f = 1,000 Hz and P0 = 200 Pa, the onset
of circulation increases to approximately 24 and 52 % of
the total period time.
Another point to mention is the size and the duration of
the recirculation regions. As we can see in Fig. 8, recir-
culation regions are much larger for f = 1 Hz compared to
f = 1,000 Hz. As a result, increasing the frequency
increases the effective hydraulic diameter of the channel.
Also according to Fig. 8, one can conclude that recircula-
tion region remains in more portion of a single period at
lower frequencies.
Figures 9 and 10 show the velocity and pressure varia-
tion throughout time for f = 1 Hz and f = 1,000 Hz,
respectively, at the inlet midpoint. Comparing these plots
with Fig. 7, we achieve two important results: First, the
phase difference between the velocity and pressure
increases as the frequency increases. As we can see in
f = 1 Hz, the velocity and pressure are approximately at
the same phase. Second, it is clear that by increasing the
Fig. 7 Velocity and pressure phase difference for P0 = 200 Pa and f = 100 Hz
Microfluid Nanofluid
123
frequency, the number of periods toward achieving a reg-
ulated change in velocity increases.
3.1.2 Pressure and velocity distribution within the channel
Pressure and its manipulation is one of the key factors that
must be considered in microvalve analysis. The pressure
contours at the selected times are represented in Fig. 11.
We show here the results only for f = 100 Hz.
Figure 11a shows the pressure distribution at the
beginning of a period. We can see that at the inlet region
the pressure is very high and it decreases along the channel.
At t = T/4, the pressure magnitude at the inlet begins to
reduce, and then it increases in further regions due to the
sinusoidal behavior of the actuation mechanism. The pre-
sence of the rectangular obstacle causes a region of rela-
tively high pressure at its front edge and decreases the
pressure near the corner vertices.
Fig. 8 Time-dependent
streamlines when P0 = 200 Pa
for a f = 1,000 Hz and
b f = 1 Hz at specified times
Microfluid Nanofluid
123
At t = T/2, the inlet pressure changes sign. This time the
pressure at the right side is much larger than at the left side,
and reverse flow will be set in the domain. The fourth
figure shows that the negative pressure amplitude decreases
at the end of the cycle. Ultimately after passing a period (at
t = T), the pressure becomes equal to what it was at the
beginning of the cycle. We also notice the inlet and outlet
pressure difference through one period. We can see that
this value changes considerably in one cycle, showing that
the flow resistance increases in the reverse flow cycle. This
indicates that the geometry shows an efficient rectification
capability.
The velocity contours are shown in Fig. 12. As shown in
this figure, the fluid flow begins at the first few moments
and decreases in magnitude till t = 0.25 T. This time the
pressure reaches its minimum value, and as there exists a
harmony between velocity and pressure at f = 100 Hz, the
velocity reaches its minimum too (Fig. 12b). Then, the
pressure suction begins which causes three large circula-
tion zones. The vortices together shape a diffuser-like path
that highly increases the flow rate through the channel. In
Fig. 12c, we can see that the velocity magnitude increases
suddenly between two vortex structures that have been
formed one at the shoulders and one behind the obstacle.
Approximately near t = 0.52 T, a reverse flow is set, and it
destroys the vortices. Now, the channel acts like a nozzle,
and the shoulders prevent the fluid flow. This prevention
will then be improved by the generation of three vortices so
that the velocity magnitude decreases as a result of
decrease in effective hydraulic diameter of the channel
(Figs. 6k, 12e). Finally, the velocity magnitude diminishes
in all regions and next period commence.
Fig. 9 Velocity and pressure are nearly in phase for P0 = 200 Pa and f = 1 Hz
Fig. 10 Phase difference between velocity and pressure for P0 = 200 Pa and f = 1,000 Hz
Microfluid Nanofluid
123
Figure 13 represents the inlet velocity profile for dif-
ferent phases. It is worthwhile to compare this plot with
the one when we set a sinusoidal velocity at the inlet. It is
obvious that in our problem the velocity profile changes
constantly with time. As a result, a variable momentum
will be carried by the fluid into the channel.
In order to study the frequency effect on velocity profile
and the net flow rate, we reported the inlet velocity profiles
for f = 1Hz and f = 1,000 Hz for the same channel and the
same pressure amplitude. As shown in Fig. 14, increasing
the frequency leads to lower velocity and thus lower flow
rates. However, at high frequencies (i.e., f = 1,000 Hz),
separation occurs after the midtime of a period, for
example, for f = 1,000 Hz, separation occurs after t = 7T/
12 as shown in Fig. 14b. Therefore, forward flow is dom-
inant at high frequencies. For lower frequencies, i.e.,
f = 1 Hz, the flow rates are considerably higher for both
forward and backward flow directions. Table 1 illustrates
the net volumetric flow rate for P0 = 200 Pa at different
frequency values. As shown in this table, when frequency
decreases, net flow rate increases. The value of net flow
rate for f = 1 Hz is 2.8 times bigger than its value for
f = 100 Hz and 5.7 times bigger than its value for
f = 1,000 Hz.
3.2 Effect of pressure amplitude
Another important parameter that has noticeable impact on
micropump system performance is the pressure amplitude. In
order to consider this effect, we have solved the problem for
two pressure amplitude of P0 = 500 Pa and P0 = 200 Pa and
have reported the results at the same interval to perform the
comparison. Figure 15 shows that when the pressure ampli-
tude is increased, separation occurs earlier. This time is
t = 0.22 T and t = 0.14 T for P0 = 200 Pa and P0 =
500 Pa, respectively. Also, if we track the vortex evolution in
those two cases at the same times, we can see that for the
greater value of amplitude, the size of the vortices is larger. It
is also noticed that the life of the circulation is increased with
the increase in pressure amplitude.
Fig. 11 Pressure distribution within the channel for P0 = 200 Pa, f = 100 Hz and t = 0, 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75 T, respectively
Microfluid Nanofluid
123
Figure 16 and Table 2 illustrate the variation in flow
rate and the net volumetric flow rate for two pressure
amplitudes. According to Fig. 16, the flow rate magnitude
is considerably higher for 500 Pa in comparison with
200 Pa. For example, the maximum value of flow rate for
500 Pa is three times its value for 200 Pa. However, in
order to perform a better comparison between the perfor-
mance of the valve and pressure amplitude magnitude, we
Fig. 12 Velocity distribution within the channel for the case P0 = 200 Pa, f = 100 Hz and t = 0.0224, 0.26, 0.48, 0.76, 0.90 and 0.96 T,
respectively
Microfluid Nanofluid
123
calculated the net volumetric flow rate and show them in
Table 2. As we can see, this value is approximately two
times bigger for 500 Pa comparing to 200 Pa.
3.3 Measuring the unsteadiness of the flow, Strouhal
number
In a study of any unsteady flow, measuring the unsteadi-
ness of the flow is a necessity as it is important to know that
what forces are dominant through one cycle period. It is
also important to know the interaction between the inertia
Fig. 13 Inlet velocity profile for P0 = 200 Pa, f = 100 Hz at
t = T/6, T/4, T/3, 5T/12, T/2, 7T/12, 2T/3, 3T/4, 5T/6 and 11T/12,
respectively
Fig. 14 Volumetric flow rate and inlet velocity profile for P0 = 200 Pa and a f = 1 Hz and b f = 1,000 Hz at t = T/6, T/4, T/3, 5T/12, T/2, 7T/
12, 2T/3, 3T/4, 5T/6 and 11T/12, respectively
Table 1 Net volumetric flow rate for different frequencies in case
P0 = 200 Pa
Frequency (Hz) 1 100 1,000
Net volumetric flow
rate (m3/s)
1.45 9 10-5 5.18 9 10-6 2.56 9 10-6
Microfluid Nanofluid
123
forces and the oscillation of the flow. Strouhal number is
defined as follows:
St ¼ fL
umax
ð8Þ
where L is the characteristic length, which in our case is the
height of the inlet channel; f is inlet pressure frequency;
and umax is the maximum velocity in the streamwise
direction. We should note that we can define a unique value
of St at each frequency value. Table 3 shows this value for
different frequency and pressure amplitudes.
As we can see in Table 3, for P0 = 200 Pa and
f = 1 Hz, St = 0.0042. As frequency increases to
f = 100 Hz, St is increased to 0.1775. We can conclude
Fig. 15 Streamlines for a P0 = 200 Pa and b P0 = 500 Pa for t = 0.22, 0.32, 0.42, 0.52, 0.88 and 0.98 T, respectively (f = 100 Hz)
Microfluid Nanofluid
123
that unsteadiness of the flow is negligible on that frequency
interval. Further increasing the frequency to f = 250 Hz
enhances the Strouhal value to approximately St = 1.
Thus, we can see that increase in frequency causes a rapid
increase in St value between 100 and 250 Hz. In fact,
f = 250 Hz is a critical value of frequency. This means
that below f = 250 Hz unsteady effects are small and
frequency effect on net flow rate is negligible.
This increase in St value becomes much sensible from
100 to 1,000 Hz. At f = 1,000 Hz, the Strouhal value is
12.6. This result was somehow expectable because as the
frequency increases to 1,000 Hz, unsteady effects become
dominant over inertial forces and thus the maximum
velocity and the net flow rate within our domain highly
decrease. One more point to consider is that as pressure
amplitude increases in each frequency, the maximum
velocity is augmented reducing St number.
Figure 17 represents the variation of maximum Rey-
nolds number with Strouhal number. As we can see in this
figure, as the dimensionless frequency (Strouhal number) is
increased, the maximum Reynolds number is reduced.
Another point is that as frequency reaches 1,000 Hz, there
will be no sensible change in Reynolds number value. This
means that at high frequencies, the inertial forces will no
longer have considerable effect on the flow.
4 Conclusion
In this paper, unsteady pulsatile flow of a Newtonian fluid
through a microchannel was investigated numerically. The
vortex evolution within the channel was obtained for
pressure amplitude of P0 = 200 Pa and frequency of
f = 100 Hz to investigate the unsteady behavior of flow
within the microchannel geometry. The velocity and
pressure changes through time were captured at the inlet
midpoint, which showed that as frequency increases, the
phase difference between velocity and pressure increases.
The streamlines were shown for frequency magnitude of 1
and 1,000 Hz. The results showed that the onset of sepa-
ration grows with increase in frequency. Also decreasing
the frequency leads to increase in recirculation zone size
and causes it to last for a longer portion of a single cycle.
Furthermore, as frequency increases, the phase shift
between velocity and pressure increases and more time is
needed for the velocity to reach a regulated behavior. It is
shown that pressure has a significant effect on flow recti-
fication. The higher pressure amplitudes limit the onset of
separation. We found that the critical value of frequency,
where St = 1, is f = 250 Hz. Increasing the frequency
Fig. 16 Variation in volumetric flow rate with time for pressure
amplitude of 200 and 500 Pa at f = 100 Hz
Table 2 Comparison of net
volumetric flow ratePressure
amplitude
(Pa)
Net volumetric
flow rate (m3/s)
200 5.18 9 10-6
500 1.31 9 10-5
Table 3 Strouhal number values for different frequency and pressure conditions
f = 1 Hz f = 100 Hz f = 1,000 Hz
P0 = 200 Pa P0 = 500 Pa P0 = 200 Pa P0 = 500 Pa P0 = 200 Pa P0 = 500 Pa
St 0.00042 0.00025 0.1775 0.0707 12.60 4.87
Fig. 17 Maximum Reynolds number versus Strouhal number
Microfluid Nanofluid
123
beyond this value makes the unsteady effects dominant,
and as a result, maximum velocity and net volumetric flow
rate considerably decrease.
References
Amirouche F, Zhou Y, Johnson T (2009) Current micropump
technologies and their biomedical applications. Microsyst Tech-
nol 15:647–666
Au AK, Lai H, Utela BR, Folch A (2011) Microvalves and
micropumps for biomems. Micromachines 2:179–220
Boustheen A, Homburg FGA, Dietzel A (2012) A modular microv-
alve suitable for lab on a foil: manufacturing and assembly
concepts. Microelectron Eng 98:638–641
Chang CL, Leong JC, Hong TF, Wang YN, Fu LM (2011)
Experimental and numerical analysis of high-resolution injection
technique for capillary electrophoresis microchip. Int J Mol Sci
12:3594–3605
Chung YC, Hsu YL, Jen CP, Lu MC, Lin YC (2004) Design of
passive mixers utilizing microfluidic self-circulation in the
mixing chamber. Lab Chip 4(1):70–77
Cohen JL, Westly DA, Pechenik A, Abruna HD (2005) Fabrication
and preliminary testing of a planar membraneless microchannel
fuel cell. J Power Sour 139:96–105
Du X, Zhang P, Liu Y, Wu Y (2011) A passive through hole
microvalve for capillary flow control in microfluidic systems.
Sens Actuators A Phys 165:288–293
Forster FK, Bardell RL (1995) Design, fabrication and testing of
fixed-valve micropumps. ASME 234:277–286
Lee DE, Soper S, Wang WJ (2008) Design and fabrication of an
electrochemically actuated microvalve. Microsyst Technol
14:1751–1756
Lin CH, Wang YN, Fu LM (2012) Integrated microfluidic chip for
rapid DNA digestion and time-resolved capillary electrophoresis
analysis. Biomicrofluidics 6:012818
Liou D, Hsieh Y, Kuo L, Yang C, Chen P (2011) Modular component
design for portable microfluidic design. Microfluid Nanofluid
10:465–474
Loverich J, Kanno I, Kotera H (2007) Single-step replicable
microfluidic check valve for rectifying and sensing low Reynolds
number flow. Microfluid Nanofluid 3:427–435
Movahed S, Li D (2011) Microfluidics cell electroporation. Micro-
fluid Nanofluid 10:703–734
Nabavi M (2009) Steady and unsteady flow analysis in microdiffusers
and micropumps: a critical review. Microfluid Nanofluid
7:599–619
Nabavi M, Mongeau L (2009) Numerical analysis of high frequency
pulsating flows through a diffuser-nozzle element in valveless
acoustic micropumps. Microfluid Nanofluid 7:669–681
Sheen H, Hsu C, Wu T, Chang C, Chu H, Yang C, Lei U (2008)
Unsteady flow behaviors in an obstacle-type valveless micro-
pump by micro-PIV. Microfluid Nanofluid 4:331–342
Stemme E, Stemme G (1993) A valveless diffuser/nozzle-based fluid
pump. Sens Actuators A Phys 39:159–167
Sun C, Huang K (2006) Numerical characterization of the flow
rectification of dynamic microdiffusers. J Micromech Microeng
16:1331–1339
Sun H, Nie Z, Fung YS (2010) Determination of free bilirubin and its
binding capacity by HSA using a microfluidic chip-capillary
electrophoresis device with a multi-segment circular-ferrofluid-
driven micromixing injection. Electrophoresis 31:3061–3069
Thompson SM, Ma HB, Wilson C (2011) Investigation of a flat-plate
oscillating heat pipe with Tesla-type check valves. Exp Therm
Fluid Sci 35:1265–1273
Truong TQ, Nguyen NT (2003) Simulation and optimization of tesla
valves. Nanotech 1:178–181
Tsai CH, Chen HT, Wang YN, Lin CH, Fu LM (2007) Capabilities
and limitations of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional numerical
methods in modeling the fluid flow in sudden expansion
microchannels. Microfluid Nanofluid 3:13–18
Tsai CH, Lin CH, Fu LM, Chen HC (2012a) High performance
microfluidic rectifier based on the sudden expansion channel
with embedded block structure. Biomicrofluidics 6:024108
Tsai CH, Yeh CH, Lin CH, Yang RJ, Fu LM (2012b) Formation of
recirculation zones in a sudden expansion microchannel with a
rectangular block structure over a wide Reynolds number range.
Microfluid Nanofluid 12:213–220
Van De Pol FCM (1989) A pump based on micro-engineering
techniques. University of Twente, Enschede
Wang K, Yue S, Wang L, Jin A, Gu C, Wang P, Feng Y, Wang Y,
Niu H (2006) Manipulating DNA molecules in nanofluidic
channels. Microfluid Nanofluid 2:85–88
Wang C, Leu T, Sun J (2007) Unsteady analysis of microvalves with
no moving parts. J Mech 23:9–14
Yang KS, Chen IY, Wang CC (2006) Performance of nozzle/diffuser
micro-pumps subject to parallel and series combinations. Chem
Eng Technol 29:703–710
Yang KS, Chen IY, Chien KH, Wang CC (2008) A numerical study
of the nozzle/diffuser micropump. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech
E 222(3):525–533
Yeh CH, Lin PW, Lin YC (2010) Chitosan microfiber fabrication
using a microfluidic chip and its application to cell cultures.
Microfluid Nanofluid 8:115–121
Microfluid Nanofluid
123