Update Analysis

8/21/2019 Update Analysis

1/24

Chapter-4

Analysis Of the Obtain Data

The present study is designed and conducted to study emotional intelligence,

anxiety and adjustment of intermediate tribal and non tribal students of East

inghbhum! "t may be recorded that #e ha$e selected the sample by using

strati%ed random sampling techni&ue! The strati%cation is based on ethnicity

'tribal and non tribal(, gender 'male and female(, socio economic status 'high

socio economic and lo# socio economic status( and place of residence 'rural

and urban(! Thus the sample is based on )x)x)x)*+ factorial design! "neach of the + sub group researcher has selected ) cases! To .eep the study

focused three objecti$es #ere framed!

On the basis of the objecti$es six hypotheses #ere framed and tested! They

are as follo#s/

0ypotheses

1 The le$el of emotional intelligence, anxiety and adjustment #ill not

$ary in intermediate students as a #hole and in its di2erent sub-

groups!1 The non-tribal students #ill not di2er signi%cantly in emotional

intelligence, anxiety and adjustment than tribal students!

1 3emale students #ill not di2er signi%cantly in emotional

intelligence, anxiety and adjustment than male students!

1 rban students #ill not di2er signi%cantly in emotional intelligence,

anxiety and adjustment than rural students!

1 The students of high socio-economic status #ill not di2er

signi%cantly in emotional intelligence, anxiety and adjustment than

the students of lo# socio-economic status!

1 Emotional intelligence #ill ha$e a signi%cant positi$e correlation

#ith adjustment and a negati$e correlation #ith anxiety!

This chapter is di$ided into four sections namely section-+, section-), section-

5 and section-4! ection-+ presents the analysis of emotional intelligence,


2/24

section-) analysis of anxiety, section-5 analysis of adjustment and section-4

presents the correlation co-e6cient of three $ariables namely emotional

intelligence, anxiety and adjustment!

Section-1

Table 1.1: presenting the main efect, interactionefect and second order efect o diferent groups onEmotional Intelligence: F-ratio

Source SS D S F-!"TI#

A ++7)58!79 + ++7)58!79 )!5:

; +95:8:4!99 + +95:8:4!99 5!454

C +95:+59!99 + +95:+59!99 5!454

D +7984+!7

8

+ +7984+!7

8

5!48

A


3/24

Auence signi%cantly emotional

intelligence!


4/24

TABLE No. 5

PERCEN AGE LEVEL OF EMO IONAL

IN ELLIGENCE

Groups N High PercentageModerat

ePercentage Low Percentage

Overall 320 112 35% 119 62.187% 9 2.812%

Male 160 35 33.125% 104 65% 3 1.875%

Female 160 60 37.5% 97 60.625% 3 1.875%

Tribal 160 35 21.875% 121 75.0% 4 2.5%

Non-Tribal 160 75 46.875% 79 49% 6 3.75%

Rural 160 61 38.125% 96 60% 3 1.875%

Urban 160 50 31.25% 103 64.375% 7 4.375%

.!"! 160 45 28.125% 112 70% 3 1.875%

#.!"! 160 64 40% 88 55% 8 5%

TABLE No.-5

$reen& &(e level o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e o) ,i))eren& ub-*rou bae, on male

)emale &ribal non-&ribal rural urban (i*( o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u lo/ o+io-e+onomi+

&a&u an, overall amle. To )ul)ill &(e uroe &(e +ore li&e, in&o &(ree +a&e*orie

namel (i*( mo,era&e an, lo/ level o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e. & i +lear )rom &(e &able

&(a& overall amle N 320 112 !&u,en& 35% )all in (i*( level 119 &u,en&

62.18% )all in mo,era&e level an, re& 9 Nine &u,en& 2.812% )alll in lo/ level o)

emo&ional in&elli*en+e.

Fur&(er &(e &able reveal &(a& over all male *rou N 160 (ave 53 &u,en& 33.125%

in (i*( level 104 &u,en& 65% in mo,era&e level an, 3 &(ree &u,en& 1.875% in

lo/ level o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.

On &(e o&(er i,e )emale *rou N 160 a &o&al number o) 60 &u,en& 37.5% )all in

(i*( level 97 &u,en& 60.625% in mo,era&e level an, 3 &u,en& 1.875% )all in lo/

level o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.


5/24

n &(e &ribal *rou N 160 35 &u,en& 21.875% )all in (i*( level 121 &u,en&

75.625% )all in mo,era&e level an, onl 4 &u,en& 2.5% )all in lo/ level o) emo&ional

in&elli*en+e.

On &(e o&(er i,e non-&ribal *rou N 160 75 &u,en& 46.875% )all in (i*( level 75&u,en& 49.375% )all in mo,era&e level an, onl 6 &u,en& 3.75% )all in lo/ level o)


Fur&(er &(e &able reveal &(a& overall rural *rou N 160 (ave 61 &u,en& 38.125%

)all in (i*( level 96 &u,en& 60% )all in mo,era&e level an, 3 &u,en& 1.875% )all in

lo/ level o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.

On &(e o&(er i,e urban *rou N 160 a &o&al no. o) 50 &u,en& 31.25% )all in (i*(

level 102 &u,en& 64.375% )all in mo,era&e level an, 7 &u,en& 4.375% )all in lo/

level o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.

n &(e (i*( o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u *rou N 160 45 &u,en& 28.125% )all in (i*(

level 112 &u,en& 70% )all in mo,era&e level an, 3 &u,en& 1.875% )all in lo/ level

o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.

On &(e o&(er i,e lo/ o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u *rou N 160 64 &u,en& 40% )all in

(i*( level 88 &u,en& 55% )all in mo,era&e level an, 8 &u,en& 5% )all in lo/ level

o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.

TABLE No. 5.1

PERCENTAGE LEVEL OF INTRA PERSONALAWARENESS (EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE)



Overall 320 137 42.812% 144 45% 39 12.187%

Male 160 61 31.125% 88 55% 11 6.875%

Female 160 79 49.375% 70 43.75% 11 6.875%

Tribal 160 62 38.75% 74 46.25% 24 15%


6/24

Non-Tribal 160 69 43.125% 72 45% 19 11.87%

Rural 160 78 48.75% 71 44.37% 11 6.875%

Urban 160 64 40% 80 50% 16 10%

.!"! 160 68 42.5% 77 48.12% 15 9.375%

#.!"! 160 66 41.25% 80 50% 14 8.75%

TABLE NO.-5.1

$reen& &(e er+en&a*e level o) &u,en& on in&ra eronal a/arene "mo&ional

n&elli*en+e o) ,i))eren& ub-*rou bae, on male )emale &ribal non-&ribal rural

urban (i*( o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u lo/ o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u an, over all amle. To

)ul)ill &(e uroe &(e emo&ional in&elli*en+e +ore li&e, in&o &(ree 3 +a&e*orie

namel (i*( mo,era&e an, lo/ level o) in&ra eronal a/arene. 137 &u,en&42.812% )all un,er (i*( level 144 &u,en& 45% )all un,er mo,era&e level an, 39

&u,en& 12.187% )all un,er lo/ level o) in&ra eronal a/arene.

Fur&(er &(e &able reveal &(a& over all male *rou N 160 (ave 61 &u,en& 31.125%

)all in (i*( level 88 &u,en& 55% )all un,er mo,era&e level an, 11 &u,en& 6.875%

)all un,er lo/ level o) in&ra eronal a/arene "mo&ional n&elli*en+e.


(i*( level 70 &u,en& 43.75% )all in mo,era&e level an, 11 &u,en& 6.875% )all in

lo/ level o) in&ra eronal a/arene "mo&ional n&elli*en+e.

n &(e &ribal *rou N 160 62 &u,en& 38.75% )all un,er (i*( level 74 &u,en&

46.25% )all un,er mo,era&e level an, 24 &u,en& 15% )all un,er lo/ level o) in&ra

eronal a/arene.

On &(e o&(er i,e non-&ribal *rou N 160 a &o&al number o) 69 &u,en& 43.125% )all

un,er (i*( level 72 &u,en& 45% )all un,er mo,era&e level an, 19 11.87% )all un,er

lo/ level o) in&ra eronal a/arene.

Fur&(er &(e &able reveal &(a& overall rural *rou N 160 (a 78 &u,en& 44.37% )all

un,er mo,era&e level an, 11 &u,en& 6.875% )all un,er lo/ level o) in&ra eronala/arene.

On &(e o&(er i,e urban *rou N 160 a &o&al number o) 64 &u,en& 40% )all in (i*(

level 80 &u,en& 50% )all in mo,era&e level an, 16 &u,en& 10% )all in lo/ level o)

in&ra eronal a/arene "mo&ional n&elli*en+e.

n &(e (i*( o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u *rou N 160 68 &u,en& 42.5% )all in (i*( level


7/24

77 &u,en& 48.12% )all in mo,era&e level an, 15 &u,en& 9.375% )all in lo/ level o)

in&ra eronal a/arene "mo&ional n&elli*en+e.

On &(e o&(er i,e lo/ o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u *rou N 160 (ave 66 &u,en&

41.25% )all in (i*( level 88 &u,en& 50% )all in mo,era&e level an, 14 &u,en&

8.75% )all in lo/ level o) in&ra eronal a/arene "mo&ional n&elli*en+e.

Overall amle N 320 (a 137 &u,en& 42.812% /ere )oun, (i*( level 144

&u,en& 45% /ere )oun, mo,era&e level an, 39 &u,en& 12.187% /ere )oun, lo/

level o) in&ra eronal a/arene o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.

TABLE No. 5.2

PERCENTAGE LEVEL OF INTER PERSONALAWARENESS (EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE)



Overall 320 142 44.37% 154 48.12% 24 7.5%

Male 160 77 48.12% 69 43.12% 14 8.75%

Female 160 69 43.12% 76 47.5% 15 9.37%

Tribal 160 61 38.12% 88 55% 11 6.87%

Non-Tribal 160 82 51.25% 67 41.87% 11 6.87%

Rural 160 89 55.62% 63 39.37% 8 5%

Urban 160 59 36.875% 84 40% 17 10.625%

.!"! 160 65 40.62% 82 51.25% 13 8.12%

#.!"! 160 73 45.62% 68 42.5% 19 11.87%

The ao!e Ta"e No-5.# $ reen& &(e er+en&a*e o) &u,en& on in&er eronal

a/arene ,imenion o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e o) ,i))eren& ub-*rou bae, on *en,er

e&(ni+i& la+e o) rei,en+e an, o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u. "a+( ub-*rou (a a &o&al

number o) 160 N 160 amle an, ea+( *rou /a +a&&ere, in&o &(ree one

+a&e*orie namel (i*( mo,era&e an, lo/ level. n &(e male ub-*rou &(e number o)


8/24

amle i N 160 an, 77 &u,en& 48.12% are )oun, (i*( level 69 &u,en& 43.12%

are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 14 &u,en& are )oun, lo/ level o) in&ereronal

a/arene o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.

)ar a )emale *rou i +on+erne, &(e reul& ,i))er. &o&al number o) 69 &u,en&

43.12% are )oun, (i*( level 76 &u,en& 47.5% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 15

&u,en& 9.37% are )oun, lo/ level o) in&er eronal a/arene o) emo&ional

in&elli*en+e.

Fur&(er &(e &able reveal &(a& overall &ribal *rou N 160 (ave 61 &u,en& 38.12%

are )oun, (i*( level 88 &u,en& 55% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 11 &u,en&

6.87% are )oun, lo/ level o) in&ereronal a/arene o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.

On &(e o&(er i,e non-&ribal *rou N 160 82 &u,en& 51.25% are )oun, (i*( level

67 &u,en& 41.87% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 11 &u,en& 6.87% are )oun, lo/

level o) in&er eronal a/arene o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.

n &(e rural *rou N 160 89 &u,en& 55.62% are )oun, (i*( level 63 &u,en&

39.37% )all in mo,era&e level an, 8 &u,en& 5% )all in lo/ level o) in&er eronal

a/arene o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.

)ar a urban *rou N 160 i +on+erne, &(e reul& ,i))er. &o&al number o) 59

&u,en& 36.875% are )oun, (i*( level 84 &u,en& 40% are )oun, mo,era&e level

an, 17 &u,en& 10.625% are )oun, lo/ level o) in&er eronal a/arene o) emo&ional

in&elli*en+e.

Fur&(er &(e &able reveal &(e overall (i*( o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u *rou N 160 65

&u,en& 40.62% are )oun, (i*( level 82 &u,en& 51.25% are )oun, mo,era&e level

an, 13 &u,en& 8.12% are )oun, lo/ level o) in&er eronal a/arene o) emo&ional

in&elli*en+e.

On &(e o&(er i,e lo/ o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u *rou N 160 73 &u,en& 45.62% )all

in (i*( level 68 &u,en& 42.5% )all in mo,era&e level an, 24 &u,en& 7.5% )all in lo/

level o) in&er eronal a/arene o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.

n overall amle N 320 (ave 142 &u,en& 44.37% are )oun, (i*( level 154

&u,en& 48.12% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 27 &u,en& 7.5% are )oun, lo/ levelo) in&er eronal a/arene o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.

TABLE No. 5.3

PERCENTAGE LEVEL OF INTRA-PERSONALMANAGEMENT


9/24



Overall 320 148 46.25% 150 46.87% 22 6.87%

Male 160 75 46.87% 67 41.87% 18 11.25%Female 160 71 44.37% 81 50.625% 8 5%

Tribal 160 64 40% 83 51.18% 13 8.12%

Non-Tribal 160 77 48.12% 69 43.12% 14 8.75%

Rural 160 81 50.625% 69 43.12% 10 6.25%

Urban 160 70 43.75% 80 50% 10 6.25%

.!"! 160 66 41.25% 87 54.37% 7 4.37%

#.!"! 160 80 50% 69 43.12% 11 6.87%

The ao!e Ta"e No.-5.% $ $reen& &(e er+en&a*e o) &u,en& on in&ra eronal

mana*emen& o) ,i))eren& ub-*rou bae, on *en,er e&(ni+i& la+e o) rei,en+e an,

o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u. "a+( *rou (a a &o&al number o) 160 N 160 an, ea+( *rou

/a +a&&ere, in&o &(ree one +a&e*orie namel (i*( mo,era&e an, lo/ level. n &(e

male *rou &(e number o) amle i N 160 75 &u,en& 46.25% are )oun, (i*(

level 150 &u,en& 46.87% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 22 &u,en& 6.87% are

)oun, lo/ level o) in&ra eronal mana*emen& o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.

)ar a )emale *rou i +on+erne, &(e reul& ,i))er. &o&al number o) 71 &u,en&44.37% are )oun, (i*( level 81 &u,en& 50.625% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, onl

8 &u,en& 5% are )oun, lo/ level o) in&ra eronal mana*emen& o) emo&ional

in&elli*en+e.

Fur&(er &(e &able reveal &(a& overall &ribal *rou N 160 64 &u,en& 40% are )oun,

(i*( level 83 &u,en& 50.625% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 13 &u,en& 8.12% are

)oun, lo/ level o) in&ra eronal mana*emen& o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.


69 &u,en& 43.12% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 19 &u,en& 8.75% are )oun, lo/level o) in&ra eronal mana*emen& o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.


43.12% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 10 &u,en& 6.25% are )oun, lo/ level o) in&ra

eronal mana*emen& o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.



10/24

&u,en& 43.75% are )oun, (i*( level 80 &u,en& 50% are )oun, mo,era&e level an,

10 &u,en& 6.25% are )oun, lo/ level o) in&ra eronal mana*emen& o) emo&ional

in&elli*en+e.

Fur&(er &(e &able reveal &(a& overall (i*( o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u *rou N 160 66


an, 7 &u,en& 4.37% are )oun, lo/ level o) in&ra eronal mana*emen& o) emo&ional

in&elli*en+e.

On &(e o&(er i,e lo/ o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u *rou N 160 80 &u,en& 50% are

)oun, (i*( level 69 &u,en& 43.12% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 11 &u,en&

6.87% are )oun, lo/ level o) in&ra eronal mana*emen& o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.

Overall amle N 320 (ave 148 &u,en& 46.25% are )oun, (i*( level 150 &u,en&

46.87% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 22 &u,en& 6.87% are )oun, lo/ level o) in&ra

eronal mana*emen& o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.

TABLE No. 5.4

PERCENTAGE LEVEL OF INTERPERSONALMANAGEMENT OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE



Male 160 70 43.75% 76 47.5% 14 8.75%

Female 160 65 40.62% 76 47.5% 19 11.87%

Tribal 160 43 26.87% 93 38.12% 24 15%

Non-Tribal 160 66 37.5% 85 53.12% 15 9.37%

Rural 160 59 36.87% 81 50.62% 20 12.5%

Urban 160 46 28.75% 93 58.12% 21 13.12%

.!"! 160 61 38.12% 82 51.12% 17 13.7%

#.!"! 160 53 33.12% 85 53.12% 22 13.75%

Overall 320 111 34.68% 172 53.75% 37 11.56%

The ao!e Ta"e No.-5.& $ $reen& &(e er+en&a*e o) &u,en& on in&er eronal

mana*emen& o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e o) ,i))eren& ub-*rou bae, on *en,er e&(ni+i&

rei,en+e an, o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u. "a+( ub-*rou (a a &o&al number o) 160 N

160 an, ea+( *rou /a +a&&ere, in&o &(ree +a&e*orie namel (i*( mo,era&e an, lo/


11/24

level. n &(e male *rou &(e number o) amle i N 160 an, 70 &u,en& 43.75% are

)oun, (i*( level 76 &u,en& 47.5% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 14 &u,en& 8.75%

are )oun, lo/ level o) in&ereronal mana*emen& o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.


40.62% are )oun, (i*( level 76 &u,en& 47.5% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 19&u,en& 11.87% are )oun, lo/ level o) in&ereronal mana*emen& o) emo&ional

in&elli*en+e.

Fur&(er &(e &able reveal &(a& overall &ribal *rou N 160 43 &u,en& 26.87% are

)oun, (i*( level 93 &u,en& 38.12% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 24 &u,en& 15%

are )oun, lo/ level o) in&er eronal mana*emen& o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.



level o) in&er eronal mana*emen& o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.

n &(e rural *rou N 160 59 &u,en& 36.87% are )oun, (i*( level 81 &u,en&50.62% in mo,era&e level an, 20 &u,en& 12.5% are )oun, lo/ level o) in&er eronal

mana*emen& o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.

)ar a urban *rou N 160 46 &u,en& 28.75% are )oun, (i*( level 93 &u,en&

58.12% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 21 &u,en& 13.12% are )oun, lo/ level or

in&ereronal mana*emen& o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.



an, 17 &u,en& 10.625% are )oun, lo/ level o) in&ereronal mana*emen& o)


On &(e o&(er i,e lo/ o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u *rou N 160 53 &u,en& 33.12% are

)oun, (i*( level 85 &u,en& 53.12% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 22 &u,en&

13.75% are )oun, lo/ level o) in&er eronal mana*emen& o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.

n over all amle N 320 (ave 111 &u,en& 34.68% are )oun, (i*( level 172

&u,en& 53.75% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 37 &u,en& 11.56% are )oun, lo/

level o) in&ereronal mana*emen& o) emo&ional in&elli*en+e.

SECTION-2


12/24

Table $.1: presenting the main efect, interactionefect and second order efect o diferent groups on"d%ustment: F-ratio

Source SS D S F

A!?ender :5++!8 + :5++!8 7!)8

;!Ethnicity :58:5)!5: + :58:5)!5: 7!)8

C!@lace of

residence

:57:!8+) + :57:!8+) 7!)

D! E :)::55!8: + :)::55!8: 7!+:8

A


13/24

The main effect of residence is found significant at .1 level on adjustment. !n other

"ords students belonging to rural and urban areas differ significantly on their level of

adjustment. #&upportive studies$.

The main effect of #'$ socio economic status is also found significant at .1 level,

means students of high socio economic status and lo" socio economic status differ

significantly on their level of adjustment #supportive studies$.

Interaction Effects

The interaction effect of ()* #gender + ethnicity$ is found statistically significant at .1

level. !n other "ords gender and ethnicity affects the level of adjustment among the

students.

The interaction effect of () #gender ) residence$ is F - 7.25 found statistically

significant at #p.1$ level. !t can be concluded that gender and residence jointly affects

the level of adjustment of students. The interactions effect of *+ #ethnicity ) residence$

is found statistically significant. %eans both jointly influence the level of students/

adjustment. The joint effect of ethnicity and socio economic status is found significant at

.1 level. The inter action effect of residence and socio economic status is also found

significant at .1 level. The interaction effect of gender and socio economic status is

also found significant at .1 level. !n onclusion it can be stated that both factor namely

gender and socio economic status jointly affects the level of adjustment of the students.

Second Order InteractionThe second order interaction of #()*))'$ gender, ethnicity, residence and socio

economic status is found significant at #p.1$ level.

TABLE NO.-5.3

PERCENTAGE LEVEL OF ADJSTMENT



Overall 320 51 15.937% 150 46.875% 119 37.187%

Male 160 18 11.25% 78 48.75% 64 40.0%

Female 160 20 12.5% 79 49.37% 61 38.125%

Tribal 160 10 6.25% 89 55.625% 61 38.125%

Non-Tribal 160 30 18.75% 70 43.75% 60 37.5%

Rural 160 21 13.125% 73 45.625% 66 41.25%

Urban 160 24 15% 84 52.5% 52 32.5%

.!"! 160 00 00% 43 26.875% 117 73.125%


14/24

#.!"! 160 38 23.75% 122 76.25% 00 00%

The ao!e Ta"e No.-5.% $$reen& &(e er+en&a*e level o) a,u&men& o) ,i))eren& ub-

*rou bae, on male )emale &ribal non-&ribal rural urban (i*( o+io-e+onomi+

&a&u lo/ o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u an, overall amle N 320. To )ul)ill &(e uroe &(ea,u&men& +ore li&e, in&o &(ree +a&e*orie namel (i*( mo,era&e an, lo/ level o)

a,u&men&. 51 &u,en& 15.937% )all in (i*( level 50 &u,en& 46.875% )all in

mo,era&e level an, 119 &u,en& 37.187% )all in lo/ level o) a,u&men&.

Fur&(er &(e &able reveal &(a& over all male *rou N 160 (a 18 &u,en& 11.25% )all

in (i*( level 78 &u,en& 48.75% )all in mo,era&e level an, 64 &u,en& 40% )all in

lo/ level o) a,u&men&.


(i*( level 79 &u,en& 49.37% )all in mo,era&e level an, 61 &u,en& 38.125% )all in

lo/ level o) a,u&men&.

n &(e &ribal *rou N 160 10 &u,en& 6.25% )all in (i*( level 89 &u,en&

55.625% )all in mo,era&e level an, 61 &u,en& 38.125% )all in lo/ level o)

a,u&men&.

On &(e o&(er i,e non-&ribal *rou N 160 30 &u,en& 18.75% )all un,er (i*( level

70 &u,en& 43.75% )all un,er mo,era&e level an, 60 &u,en& 37.5% )all in lo/ level

o) a,u&men&.

Fur&(er &(e &able reveal &(a& over all rural *rou N 160 (ave 21 &u,en& 13.125%

)all in (i*( level 73 &u,en& 45.625% )all in mo,era&e level an, 66 &u,en& 41.25%

)all in lo/ level o) a,u&men&.

On &(e o&(er i,e urban *rou N 160 a &o&al number o) 24 &u,en& 15% )all in (i*(

level 84 &u,en& 52.5% )all in mo,era&e level an, 52 &u,en& 32.5% )all in lo/ level

o) a,u&men&.

n &(e (i*( o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u *rou N 160 0 :ero &u,en& 0% )all in (i*(

level 43 &u,en& 26.875% )all in mo,era&e level an, 117 73.125% )all in lo/ level o)

a,u&men&.

On &(e o&(er i,e lo/ o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u *rou N 160 38 &u,en& 23.75% )all

un,er (i*( level 122 &u,en& 76.25% )all un,er mo,era&e level an, 0 ero &u,en&

)all un,er lo/ level o) a,u&men&.

TABLE NO.-5.3.1

PERCENTAGE LEVEL OF !OME DIMENSION


15/24

(ADJSTMENT)



Male 160 00 00% 50 31.25% 110 68.75%

Female 160 00 00% 52 32.5% 108 67.5%

Tribal 160 00 00% 102 63.75% 58 36.25%

Non-Tribal 160 00 00% 60 37.50% 100 26.50%

Rural 160 00 00% 48 30% 112 70%

Urban 160 00 00% 58 36.25% 102 63.75%

.!"! 160 00 00% 01 0.625% 159 99.375%

#.!"! 160 00 00% 107 66.87% 53 33.125%

Overall 320 00 00% 104 32.5% 216 67.5%

The ao!e Ta"e No.-5.%.1 $$reen& &(e er+en&a*e o) &u,en& on (ome ,imenion o)

,i))eren& ub-*rou bae, on *en,er e&(ni+i& rei,en+e an, o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u.

"a+( ub-*rou (a a &o&al number o) 160 &u,en& N 160 an, ea+( *rou /a

+a&&ere, in&o &(ree +a&e*orie namel (i*( mo,era&e an, lo/. n &(e male ub-*rou

&(e number o) amle i N 160 an, 0 :ero &u,en& 0% i )oun, (i*( level o) (ome

a,u&men&. 50 &u,en& 31.25% are )all in mo,era&e level an, 110 &u,en& 68.75%

are )all in lo/ level o) (ome a,u&men&.

)ar a )emale *rou +on+erne, &(e reul& ,i))er. &o&al number o) 52 &u,en&32.5% are )all mo,era&e level o) (ome a,u&men& 108 &u,en& 67.5% &u,en& are

)all in lo/ level o) (ome a,u&men& an, no &u,en& are )oun, in (i*( level o) (ome

a,u&men&.

n &(e &ribal *rou N 160 0 :ero &u,en& 0% )all in (i*( level 102 &u,en&

63.75% )all in mo,era&e level an, 58 &u,en& 36.25% )all in lo/ level o) (ome

a,u&men&.

On &(e o&(er i,e non-&ribal *rou N 160 0 :ero &u,en& )all in (i*( level 60

&u,en& 37.5% )all in mo,era&e level an, 100 &u,en& 26.5% )all in lo/ level o)(ome a,u&men&.

n &(e rural *rou N 160 0 :ero &u,en& 0% )all in (i*( level 48 &u,en& 30%

)all in mo,era&e level an, 112 &u,en& 70% )all in lo/ level o) (ome a,u&men&.

)ar a urban *rou i +on+erne, &(e reul& ,i))er. &o&al number o) 58 &u,en&

36.25% are )oun, mo,era&e level 102 &u,en& 63.75% are )oun, lo/ level an, 0


16/24

:ero &u,en& )oun, (i*( level o) (ome a,u&men&.


:ero &u,en& 0% )all in (i*( level 1 &u,en& 0.625% )all in mo,era&e level an, 159

&u,en& 99.375% )all in lo/ level o) (ome a,u&men&.

On &(e o&(er i,e lo/ o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u *rou N 160 0 :ero &u,en& 0% )all

in (i*( level 107 &u,en& 66.87% )all in mo,era&e level an, 53 &u,en& 33.125% )all

in lo/ level o) (ome a,u&men&.

n over all amle N 320 (a 0 :ero &u,en& 0% )all in (i*( level 104 &u,en&

32.5% )all in mo,era&e level an, 216 &u,en& 67.5% )all in lo/ level o) a,u&men&.

TABLE NO.-5.3.2

PERCENTAGE LEVEL OF !EALT! DIMENSION

(ADJSTMENT)



Male 160 00 0% 51 31.87% 109 68.12%

Female 160 01 0.625% 60 37.50% 99 61.875%

Tribal 160 00 0% 56 35% 104 65%

Non-Tribal 160 01 0.625% 66 41.25% 94 58.75%

Rural 160 00 0% 60 37.50% 100 62.50%

Urban 160 01 0.625% 63 39.37% 94 60.62%.!"! 160 00 0% 6 3.75% 154 96.25%

#.!"! 160 01 0.625% 117 73.12% 43 26.875%

Overall 320 01 0.625% 125 39.062% 194 60.625%

The ao!e Ta"e No.-5.%.# $$reen& &(e er+en&a*e o) &u,en& on (eal&( ,imenion

o) a,u&men& o) ,i))eren& ub-*rou bae, on *en,er e&(ni+i& rei,en+e an, o+io-

e+onomi+ &a&u. "a+( *rou (a a &o&al number o) 160N 160 an, ea+( *rou /a

+a&&ere, in&o &(ree +a&e*orie namel (i*( mo,era&e an, lo/ level. n &(e male ub-

*rou &(e number o) amle i N 160 an, 0 :ero &u,en& 0% i )oun, (i*( level o)(eal&( a,u&men& 51 &u,en& 31.87% are mo,era&e level an, 109 &u,en& 68.12%

are )oun, lo/ level o) (eal&( ,imenion a,u&men&.


37.5% are )oun, mo,era&e level 99 &u,en& 61.875% are )oun, lo/ level o) (eal&(

a,u&men&.


17/24

Fur&(er &(e &able reveal &(a& overall Tribal *rou N 160 :ero 0 &u,en& i )oun,

(i*( level 56 &u,en& 35% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 104 &u,en& 65% are

)oun, lo/ level o) (eal&( a,u&men&.

On &(e o&(er i,e Non-Tribal *rou N 160 0 :ero &u,en& i )oun, (i*( level 66

&u,en& 41.25% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 94 &u,en& 58.75% are )oun, lo/level o) (eal&( a,u&men&.

n &(e rural *rou N 160 0 :ero &u,en& i )oun, (i*( level 60 &u,en& 37.5%

are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 100 &u,en& 62.5% are )oun, lo/ level o) (eal&(

,imenion a,u&men&.


&u,en& 39.37% are )oun, mo,era&e level 97 &u,en& 60.62% are )oun, lo/ level

an, :ero 0 &u,en& 0% i )oun, (i*( level o) (eal&( a,u&men&. Fur&(er &(e &able

reveal &(a& over all (i*( o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u *rou N 160 :ero 0 &u,en& 0%

i )oun, (i*( level 6 &u,en& 3.75% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 154% 96.25% are

)oun, lo/ level o) (eal&( ,imenion a,u&men&.

On &(e o&(er i,e lo/ o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u *rou N 160 01 One &u,en&

0.625% )all in (i*( level 117 &u,en& 73.12% )all in mo,era&e level an, 43 &u,en&

26.875% )all in lo/ level o) (eal&( ,imenion a,u&men&.

Overall amle N 320 (a 01 One &u,en& 0.625% i )oun, (i*( level 125

&u,en& 39.062% )all in mo,era&e level an, 194 &u,en& 60.625% )all in lo/ level o)

(eal&( ,imenion a,u&men&.

TABLE NO.-5.3.3

PERCENTAGE LEVEL OF SOCIAL DIMENSION

(ADJSTMENT)



Male 160 00 0% 77 48.12% 83 51.87%

Female 160 00 0% 79 49.37% 81 50.62%

Tribal 160 00 0% 79 49.37% 81 50.62%

Non-Tribal 160 00 0% 79 49.37% 81 50.62%

Rural 160 00 0% 74 56.25% 86 53.75%

Urban 160 00 0% 81 50.62% 79 49.37%

.!"! 160 00 0% 11 6.875% 149 93.125%

#.!"! 160 00 0% 154 90.62% 15 9.375%


18/24

Overall 320 00 0% 159 49.68% 161 50.31%

The ao!e Ta"e No.-5.%.% $$reen& &(e er+en&a*e o) &u,en& on (eal&( ,imenion

o) a,u&men& o) ,i))eren& ub-*rou. ;ae, on *en,er e&(ni+i& rei,en+e an, o+io-

e+onomi+ &a&u. "a+( ub-*rou (a &o&al number o) 160 N 160 &u,en& an, ea+(*rou i +a&&ere, in&o &(ree +a&e*orie namel (i*( mo,era&e an, lo/ level. n &(e

male *rou &(e number o) amle i

N 160 an, :ero 0 &u,en& i )oun, (i*( level o) o+ial a,u&men& 77 &u,en&

48.12% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 83 &u,en& 51.87% are )oun, lo/ level o)

o+ial a,u&men&.


79.377% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, :ero 0 &u,en& 0% i )oun, (i*( level o)

o+ial ,imenion a,u&men&.

Fur&(er &(e &able reveal &(a& overall &ribal *rou N 160 :ero 0 &u,en& 0% )all in

(i*( level 79 &u,en& 43.37% )all in mo,era&e level an, 81 &u,en& 50.62% are

)oun, lo/ level o) o+ial ,imenion a,u&men&.

On &(e o&(er i,e Non-&ribal *rou N 160 :ero 0 &u,en& 0% i )oun, (i*( level


level o) o+ial ,imenion a,u&men&.

n &(e rural *rou N 160 :ero 0 &u,en& 0% i )oun, (i*( level 74 &u,en&

46.25% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 86 &u,en& 53.3% are )oun, lo/ level o) o+ial

,imenion a,u&men&

)ar a urban *rou N 160 +on+erne, &(e reul& ,i))er. &o&al number o) 81

&u,en& 50.62% are )oun, mo,era&e level 79 &u,en& 49.37% are )oun, lo/ level o)

o+ial ,imenion an, :ero 0 &u,en& 0% i )oun, (i*( level o) o+ial ,imenion

a,u&men&.

Fur&(er &(e &able reveal &(a& over all (i*( o+io-e+onomi+ *rou N 160 :ero 0

0% &u,en& i )oun, (i*( level 11 &u,en& 6.875% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 149

&u,en& 93.125% are )oun, lo/ level o) o+ial a,u&men&.

)ar a lo/ o+io-e+onomi+ *rou N 160 +on+erne, &(e reul& ,i))er. &o&alnumber o) 145 &u,en& 90.62% )all in mo,era&e level 15 &u,en& 9.375% )all in lo/

level an, :ero 0 &u,en& 0% )all in (i*( level o) o+ial ,imenion o) a,u&men&.

Overall amle N 320 (a :ero 0 0% &u,en& i )oun, (i*( level 149 &u,en&


o+ial ,imenion o) a,u&men&.


19/24

TABLE NO.-5.3.4

PERCENTAGE LEVEL OF EMOTIONAL DIMENSION OF

ADJSTMENT

Groups N High Percentage Moderate Percentage Low Percentage

Male 160 22 13.75% 70 43.75% 68 42.50%

Female 160 26 16.25% 90 56.25% 44 27.50%

Tribal 160 30 18.75% 76 47.50% 54 33.75%

Non-Tribal 160 28 17.50% 103 64.37% 29 18.12%

Rural 160 28 17.50% 77 48.12% 55 34.37%

Urban 160 30 18.75% 93 58.12% 37 23.12%

.!"! 160 04 2.50% 69 43.12% 87 55.62%

#.!"! 160 30 18.75% 104 65% 26 16.25%

Overall 320 59 18.43% 167 52.187% 94 29.37%

The ao!e Ta"e No.-5.%.& $ $reen& &(e er+en&a*e o) &u,en& on emo&ional

,imenion o) a,u&men& o) ,i))eren& ub-*rou bae, on *en,er e&(ni+i& rei,en+e

an, o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u. "a+( ub-*rou (a a &o&al number o) 160 &u,en& N

160 an, ea+( ub-*rou (a a +a&&ere, in&o &(ree +a&e*orie namel (i*( mo,era&e

an, lo/ level. n &(e male *rou &(e number o) amle i N 160 an, 22 &u,en&

13.75% are )oun, (i*( level 70 &u,en& 43.75% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 68&u,en& 42.5% are )oun, lo/ level o) emo&ional a,u&men&.


16.25% are )oun, (i*( level 90 &u,en& 56.25% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 44

&u,en& 27.5% are )oun, lo/ level o) emo&ional ,imenion o) a,u&men&.

Fur&(er &(e &able reveal &(a& overall &ribal *rou N 160 30 &u,en& 18.75% are )all

in (i*( level 76 &u,en& 47.5% are )all in mo,era&e level an, 54 &u,en& 33.75%

are )all in lo/ level o) emo&ional ,imenion o) a,u&men&.

On &(e o&(er i,e Non-&ribal *rou N 160 (ave 28 &u,en& 17.5% are )oun, (i*(

level 103 &u,en& 64.37% are )oun, in mo,era&e level an, 29 &u,en& 18.12% are

)oun, lo/ level o) emo&ional ,imenion o) a,u&men&.




20/24

emo&ional ,imenion o) a,u&men&.

)ar a urban *rou N 160 30 &u,en& 18.75% are )oun, (i*( level 93

&u,en& 58.12% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 37 &u,en& 23.12% are )oun, lo/

level o) emo&ional ,imenion o) a,u&men&.



an, 87 &u,en& 55.62% are )oun, lo/ level o) emo&ional ,imenion o) a,u&men&.

On &(e o&(er i,e lo/ o+io-e+onomi+ &a&u *rou N 160 30 &u,en& 18.75% are

)oun, (i*( level 104 &u,en& 65% are )oun, mo,era&e level an, 26 &u,en&

16.25% are )oun, lo/ level o) emo&ional ,imenion o) a,u&men&.

Overall amle N 320 (ave 59 &u,en& 18.43% are )oun, (i*( level 169 &u,en&


emo&ional ,imenion o) a,u&men&.

SECTION-3

Table &.1: presenting the main efect, interactionefect and second order efect o diferent groups on"n'iet(: F-ratio

Source SS D S FA +8++7!74 + +8++7!74 !)4+

; 5494!75 + 5494!75 +4!59

C 89!57 + 89!57 !)7

D 74+7!+ + 7+7!+ !):

A; +849)!)4 + +849)!)4 !5:

AC 484:!:98 + 484:!:98 +98!::

AD )8)75:!4 + )8)75!4 +4!58

;C 4975)!+7 + 4975)!+7 +:9!47

;D +5))49!+7 + +5))49!+7 84!

CD 4975)!+7 + 4975)!+7 +:9!47

A;CD )7)7!4) + )7)7!4) +!+)

=ith in

treatment

error

7555!4 54 )4))!+4


21/24

Table 2.1:

The above omnibus sho"s the main effect, interaction effect and second order interaction

of gender, socio0 economic status, ethnicity and residence on an)iety.

Main effect

The main effect of gender on an)iety is found significant, it is clear from the F value

.21. This means both gender #male and female$ defer significantly on their an)iety

level at .5 level significance. #&upportive studies$

The main effect of * #ethnicity$ is found significant at .1 levels. !n other "ords

students of both ethnicities namely tribal and non0tribal differ significantly on their

an)iety level #supportive studies$.

The main effect of residence and socio economic status on an)iety is found insignificant.

!t can be said that students belonging to urban and rural areas and students belonging to

high socio economic status and lo" socio economic status not significantly differ on their

an)iety level #supportive studies$.

Interaction effects

The interaction effect gender + ethnicity on an)iety is found significant. !t is evident

from the F value .3. !n other "ords gender and ethnicity jointly affects the an)iety level

of students.Further the table reveals that the interaction effect of gender + residence jointly influence

the level of an)iety of students. The interaction effect of ( ) ' #gender + socio economic

status$ is found significant at .1 level. The interaction effect of * ) #ethnicity +

residence$ is founds statistically significant at .1 level. The interaction effect of * ) '

#ethnicity + socio economic status$ is found significant at .1 level. The joint effect of

) ' #residence + socio economic status$ is found statistically significant at .1 level. !n

other "ords residence and socio economic status jointly influence the level of an)iety of

students.

Second order interaction

!t is clear evident from the above table that the second order interaction ()*))'

#gender + ethenicity + residence + socio economic status$ is not significant. !n

conclusion it can be stated that all the four factors namely #gender, ethnicity, residence

and socio economic status$ not jointly affects the an)iety level of students.


22/24

TABLE NO.-"

PERCENTAGE LEVEL OF AN#IET$

Groups N High Percentage Moderate Percentage Low Percentage

Male 160 21 13.125% 77 58.12% 62 38.75%

Female 160 20 12.50% 70 43.75% 70 43.75%

Tribal 160 00 0% 60 37.5% 100 62.5%

Non-Tribal 160 38 23.75% 90 56.25% 32 29%

Rural 160 16 10% 72 45% 72 45%

Urban 160 23 14.375% 75 46.875% 62 38.75%

.!"! 160 00 0% 106 66.25% 54 33.75%

#.!"! 160 40 25% 42 26.25% 78 48.75%

Overall 320 40 12.5% 148 46.25% 132 41.25%

The ao!e Ta"e No.-' $$reen& &(e level o) n


23/24

)all in mo,era&e level an, 72 &u,en& 45% )all in lo/ level o) n


24/24

SECTION-4

This section presents the inter correlation of emotional intelligence, adjustment and

an)iety on the over all sample 4- 32.

Table .1 resents the inter correlation of emotional intelligence, adjustment and an)iety.

Variables Ad!st"ent An#iet$ E"otionalintelli%ence

Ad!st"ent 1 0.276 .33

An#iet$ 1 0.21

E"otional intelli%ence 1

!t is clear from the table .1 adjustment and an)iety significantly and negatively

correlated "ith each other. !n other "ords lo"er the an)iety higher the adjustment or vice

versa. Further the table reveals relationship bet"een adjustment and emotional

intelligence and it is found positive but the relationship is not significant. The correlation

bet"een an)iety and emotional intelligence is found negative but this relationship is not

significant. The relationship bet"een emotional intelligence and adjustment emotional

intelligence and an)iety found insignificant, it may be occurred due to the chance factor.

Date post:	07-Aug-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	amit-sharma
View:	219 times
Download:	0 times

Update Analysis

Documents