Update on Magnet Schools
Dr. Kim Morrison-Director for Federal Programs and
Strategic Planning-
October 18, 2011
Phase 3 Magnet Schools
Phase 3 has completed their last year of implementation as of September 30th(2010-2011)
Hanes Magnet SchoolPhilo Magnet AcademyRJ Reynolds High School
Phase 3 Magnet Schools The magnet schools in this cycle have
met or made significant progress on all of their federal targets.
Philo, Hanes and Reynolds have made academic gains and attracted a large number of applicants.
A big thank you goes out to these schools for a tremendous amount of work that resulted in great opportunities for students.
Phase 3 Magnet Schools
Budget
Expenditures-
$298,742 Personnel/Technology
$181,625 Staff Development/Supplies
$225,472 Contractual
Total Spent: $ 705,839
Project Budget Total: $4.7 Million*Overall applications have increased from 500 in 2001 to over 2000
in 2011 (all magnets)
Rigorous Evaluation
This report was obtained over a 3-year rigorous evaluation of the MSAP schools.
SERVE Center at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro conducted the study.
This study used magnet schools compared to non-magnet within the district.
Rigorous Evaluation
Academic growth was observed based on whether magnet dosage had any effect on outcomes Overall magnet effects were significant in
Philo-Grade 6-8 MathHanes-Grade 6 and Grade 8 MathReynolds-English I and Algebra I
Rigorous Evaluation
Magnet effects were significantly positive for minority students in the following areas: Philo Hispanic Students-Grade 7 and 8
Math Philo African American Students-Grade 6
and 7 Math
Rigorous Evaluation
Magnet effects were significantly positive for minority students in the following areas: Hanes African American Students-Grade 8
Math Reynolds Hispanic Students- Algebra I Reynolds African American Students-
Geometry
Rigorous Evaluation
In the area of climate, magnet students compared to students attending traditional middle and high schools, have high perceptions of climate at each of the three magnet schools.
Rigorous Evaluation
Magnet students show significant positive perceptions of the following areas: Respectful classroom behaviors Student high expectations Student-student trust Student-teacher trust
Rigorous Evaluation Conclusions
The results suggest that magnet programs produce detectable effects on student achievement.
In addition to achievement effects, the school climate at each magnet school appears to have high student perceptions of climate.
Rigorous Evaluation Conclusions
Lastly, these three magnet schools were evidence that a well implemented program, carefully monitored, can show effectiveness even after only three years.
Again, a big thank you to the administration, staff and especially students of Philo Magnet Academy, Hanes Magnet School, and Reynolds High School
Phase 4 Magnet Schools
Phase 4 Magnet Schools
Konnoak Elementary School Mandarin Chinese Global Infusion Technology
Brunson Elementary School Science, Technology, Engineering and
Mathematics Engineering is Elementary Design Process
Phase 4
John F. Kennedy High School Pro-Start Restaurant Management Construction and Design Health Sciences Creative Enterprises
Konnoak Elementary School
Theme using technology to connect globally
International connections throughout units of study
Konnoak Elementary School
Part of the North Carolina Global Schools Network
Chinese Immersion at Kindergarten with two certified Chinese teachers-Confucius Classroom
Four International Teachers Added to the Staff
Highlighted by the Governor
Brunson Elementary School
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics
Engineering is Elementary through hands-on modules
Creativity, problem-solving, and design
Brunson Elementary School Staff has been trained in Engineering is
Elementary. The school has purchased engineering
kits to be used with each grade level A STEM coordinator was hired to
support STEM implementation two days a week.
District in South Carolina visited to explore STEM themes for their elementary schools
Service
John F. Kennedy High School
Over 100 students in the High School academies
Focus and training on entrepreneurship and cooperative learning.
Training on Renzulli Learning Integrated Units with entrepreneurship
embedded in learning
Phase 4
Phase 4 schools have written detailed implementation plans aligned with their School Improvement Plans with targets and benchmarks in the following areas:
1. Minority isolation/marketing
2. Parental involvement
3. Professional Development
4. Innovative Practices
5. Sustainability
Phase 4
Phase 4 schools have already participated in multiple hours of staff development and recruited over 170 students in the first class of magnet students.
Thank you for your support to begin these unique magnets and to provide three more options for parental choice.
Ashley Elementary
IB
Diggs Elementary-
Arts
Mineral Springs
Elementary- Arts
Paisley Middle IB
Hill Middle-Arts
Mineral Springs Middle-
Arts
Parkland High-Cultural Arts
Reynolds High-Arts
Parkland High International
and IB
Philo Middle International
and Technology
Hanes MiddleMath, Science,
Pre-Engineering
Konnoak Elementary
International
Atkins Technology High School
Brunson Elementary
Math, Science, Pre-
Engineering
Winston-Salem/Forsyth Magnet Schools
18 District-Wide Magnet Schools
Name of School Composite2009-2010
Composite2010-2011
Growth2007
Growth2011
Ashley Elementary
52.6 47.7 Not Met High Growth
Diggs Elementary
49.2 61.3 Not Met Expected
Downtown Elementary
91.9 92.4 High Growth High Growth
Moore Elementary
81.1 80.8 Expected Expected
Mineral Springs Elementary
69.4 74.3 Not Met Expected
KonnoakElementary
57.6 54.3 Less/Exp
Elementary Magnet Schools
Middle Magnet Schools
Name of School Composite2009-2010
Composite2010-2011
Growth2007
Growth2011
Hanes Middle 86.1 86.5 High Growth High Growth
Hill Middle 45.8 43.7 Not Met Expected
Mineral Springs Middle
61.4 58.7 Not Met Expected
Paisley Middle 84.7 81.6 Growth Expected
Philo Middle 47.3 53.7 Not Met High Growth
High School Magnet Schools
Parkland High 68.4 70.8 Not MetLow Performing
High Growth
Reynolds High
70.1 71.0 Growth Expected
Atkins-Comp Tech
45.6 50.7 Not MetLow Performing
Expected
Atkins-Bio-Tech
48.1 53.2 Not MetLow Performing
Less/Exp
Atkins-Pre-Engineering
47.7 48.1 Not MetLow Performing
Less/Exp
WSPA 62.1 56.9 Not MetLow Performing
Less /Exp
Name of School
Composite2009-2010
Composite2010-2011
Growth2007
Growth2011
WS/FCS Magnet Schools
Questions???