Date post: | 02-Jun-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | shalini-rai |
View: | 179 times |
Download: | 2 times |
Sona Koyo Steering Systems Ltd Dharuhera Team
Welcomes
1/49
Organization & Products
*
DELHI
GURGAON
MUMBAI
Chennai PlantChennai Plant
CHENNAI
Dharuhera Plant
DHARUHERA
PRODUCTS DHR PLANTColumn Electric Power Steering Assy. (CEPS)
Pinion Valve Assy. (PV Assy.)
Upper Shaft
Dharuhera PlantFounded : Jul 20061st. SOP started : Jul 2007Annual Sales F-10 : 264Cr.
Hydraulic Power Steering Assy.(HPS)
Gurgaon PlantGurgaon Plant
SKSSL Group(Gurgaon, Dharuhera & Chennai)
Products & Customers
Column Electric Power Steering (CEPS) Hydraulic Power Steering
Customer: Maruti Suzuki India Ltd
Mo
de
ls
Assembly Assembly
Wagon R Alto
Zen Estilo
Customer: Mahindra & Mahindra
Mo
de
lsScorpio
Bolero
Productivity improvement on Valve Body Line
Project Selection
Valve Body
Pinion Valve Assembly
Theme Selection
Customer RequirementF13F14F15
182,023
206,340
236,340
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
F13 F14 F15
Customer Requirement for HPS
CustomerRequirementN
os
For HPS Customer Requirement trend increasing
19695
12278
0
10000
20000
30000
Customer Requirement line Capacity
Capacity Vs Requirement per month
Gap : 7417 Nos
Problem Statement
Increase Line capacity by investing in
new machines
Increase Line capacity by
doing kaizens
Option chosen
HPS line capacity found 44 % less compared to customer requirement for F-15
Process Mapping : HPS Group
Understanding Situation
Receipt store RQA
HPS AssemblyDispatch
Input Shaft
PV Assembly
Valve Body
Pinion Shaft
Torsion Bar
HPS Assembly Block Diagram
21600 21207
12278
44862
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
I.S P.S V.B T.B
Customer requirement Vs line capacity Customer Requirement
per month 19695Nos &Takt Time 56
Capacity
Requirement
Bottleneck Line :Gap of 7417 parts
Understanding Situation
IDGrinding
Gangway
Crack Detection
Pass Hole Deburring& pining
I DBuffing
Washing
Spline &SlitBroaching
Slit GrindingHoning
Sleev Pressing
I D Deburring
Pass Hole Drilling
ID & ODBuffing
Line Layout & Process flow
Gangway
A-83 A-91 A-74 A-62 B-85
A-88
Induction Hardening
A-70A-68A-84A-86
B-08For Assy.
Washing
B-10
A-76
Understanding Situation
Induction HardeningPasss Hole Deburining & piningSleev PressingI.D GrinidingSlit GrindingHoningI.D. & O.D Buffi ngCrack CheckWashing
46 4535 39 36
90
35 4052
3547
3645
35
0102030405060708090
100
M/c Cycle Time
Cycle Time
Cyc
le T
ime
( Se
c )
Understanding Situation
Target Cycle Time 55 Sec
HPS line capacity found 44 % less compared to customer requirement for F-15
Target Setting
90
50
5
0
20
40
60
80
100
Current Target
Sec
onds
Target cycle time for Induction Hardening Process Manual
Auto
We set target of achieving Induction Hardening process Cycle Time 55 sec (50 sec Auto +5 sec Manual) by 30th May-14 .
Action Plan
S.No Activities Feb-14-Jun-14
Feb March April May Jun July
1 Understanding Situation
2 Data Collection
3 Analysis
4 Countermeasure implementation
5 Effectiveness Monitoring of Countermeasures
6 Standardization
AnalysisOperation Sequence at
Induction Hardening M/c.
Positioning
Tempering
Unloading
Loading
Cooling
Positioning
I.D Heating
Quenching
PositionIng
Slit Heating
Quenching
Sketch Diagram of Induction Hardening M/c
Loading I.D. Hardening Slit Hardening Tempering Un-Loading
Three operation (ID Hardening, Slit Hardening & Tempering) performed for each component
37%
63%
Effective Process Time
Non Effective ProcessTime (Transfer Time)
Analysis cont..
Non-effective operation Time for Induction Hardening process
S.No operation Time(sec.)
1 Positioning for I.D Hardening 102 Positioning for Slit Hardening 273 Positioning for Tempering 104 Component Unloading 10
Total Non Effective Time 57
Hence brain storming done to reduce None
Effective Process time
Effective operation Time for Induction Hardening process
S.No operation Time(sec.)
1 Heating at ID hardening station 82 Quenching at I.D hardening station 103 Heating at slit Hardening station 34 Quenching at slit Hardening 55 Heating at Tempering station 36 Cooling at tempering station 6
Total Effective Time 33
Cycle Time study done and found only 37 % time is Effective for Process but 63 % time is not effective for hardening Process to achieve product parameter
Analysis cont..Break-up of non effective time
Hardening machine
S.No Non Effective Time Time(sec.)
1 Positioning for I.D Hardening 102 Positioning for Slit Hardening 273 Positioning for Tempering 104 Unloading 10
Total Non Effective Time 57
1 Loader Reverse 22 Gripper Loading Station Clamp 13 Loader Up 14 Loader Forward 25 Loader Down 16 Gripper Loading Station Declamp 17 Job lift Up Id Hardening Station 28 Job Lift Down I.D hardening Station 19 Loader Reverse 210 Gripper I.D Station Clamp 111 Loader Up 112 Loader Forward 213 Loader Down 114 Gripper I.D Station Declamp 115 Job lift Up Slit Hardening Station 216 Rotate for Slit Detection 1117 Job Lift Down Slit Hardening Station 118 Ratate for Heating Position 219 Job lift Up Slit Hardening Station 220 Job lift Down Slit Hardening Station 121 Loader Reverse 222 Gripper Clamp Slit Hardening Station 123 Loader Up 124 Loader Forward 225 Loader Down 126 Gripper Declamp Slit Hardening Station 127 Job lift Up Tempering Station 228 Job lift Down Tempering Station 129 Loader Reverse 230 Gripper Clamp Tempering Station 131 Loader Up 132 Loader Forward 233 Loader Down 134 Gripper Declamp Tempering Station 1
S.No. Operation Time
Po
siti
on
ing
for
I.D
H
ard
en
ing
Po
siti
on
ing
for
Slit
Har
de
nin
gP
osi
tio
nin
g fo
r Te
mpe
rin
gC
om
po
nrn
t U
nlo
adin
g
Analysis cont..Is this Step Is necessary ?
Can We Eliminate ?
Can we reduce ?
Can we overlap with other activities ?
Conclusion (Should We Change it)
1 Loader Reverse 2 P P Yes
2 Gripper Loading Station Clamp 1 P No
3 Loader Up 1 P P Yes
4 Loader Forward 2 P P Yes
5 Loader Down 1 P P Yes
6 Gripper Loading Station Declamp 1 P No
7 Job lift Up Id Hardening Station 2 P No
8 Job Lift Down I.D hardening Station 1 P No
9 Loader Reverse 2 P P Yes
10 Gripper I.D Station Clamp 1 P No
11 Loader Up 1 P P Yes
12 Loader Forward 2 P P Yes
13 Loader Down 1 P P Yes
14 Gripper I.D Station Declamp 1 P No
15 Job lift Up Slit Hardening Station 2 P No
16 Rotate for Slit Detection 11 P P Yes
17 Job Lift Down Slit Hardening Station 1 P No
18 Ratate for Heating Position 2 P No
19 Job lift Up Slit Hardening Station 2 P No
20 Job lift Down Slit Hardening Station 1 P No
21 Loader Reverse 2 P P Yes
22 Gripper Clamp Slit Hardening Station 1 P No
23 Loader Up 1 P P Yes
24 Loader Forward 2 P P Yes
25 Loader Down 1 P P Yes
26 Gripper Declamp Slit Hardening Station 1 P No
27 Job lift Up Tempering Station 2 P No
28 Job lift Down Tempering Station 1 P No
29 Loader Reverse 2 P P Yes
30 Gripper Clamp Tempering Station 1 P No
31 Loader Up 1 P P Yes
32 Loader Forward 2 P P Yes
33 Loader Down 1 P P Yes
34 Gripper Declamp Tempering Station 1 P No
Fo
r T
em
pe
rin
gF
or C
om
po
nrn
t U
nlo
ad
ing
S.No. Time
Questionnaire
OperationF
or I
.D H
ard
en
ing
Fo
r S
lit H
ard
en
ing
Analysis cont..
ProblemNon Effective time is more at Valve body Induction Hardening M/c
Why-1 Why Non effective (non-Operation) time is more ?
Answer Component Transfer time for different operating is more
Why-2 Why Component Transfer time for different operating is more ?
Answer At a time only single component transfer for different operation.
Why-3 Why single component transfer for different operation?
Answer Process was not optimize for Three component transfer at a time.
Root-causeAt a time only single component transfer for different operation
Counter measureAt a three component should be transfer for different operation.
Implementation of CountermeasureKaizen-1: Cycle time reduction Induction Hardening machine
O0004(NC PROG) BEFOREG98M47(LOADER REVERSE)M48 (GRIPPER 1 CLAMP)M44 (LOADER UP)M46(LOADER FORWARD)M45 (LOADER DOWN)M49 (GRIPPER 1 UNCLAMP)M40G04P1000 M08G04P1000 M3S80M12G04P1400 M10M13G04P10000M11M09G04P500M41M47(LOADER REVERSE)M50(GRIPPER 2 CLAMP) M44 (LOADER UP)M46(LOADER FORWARD)M45 (LOADER DOWN)M51(GRIPPER 2 UNCLAMP) G90G01F2000C0.0G04P500G90G01G31F2000C359.0 M69G04P500G01F2500C-90.0
G04P500M68B7500M70G04P3000 M19M71G04P6000 M20M69M47(LOADER REVERSE)M52(GRIPPER 3 CLAMP)M44 (LOADER UP)M46(LOADER FORWARD)M45 (LOADER DOWN)M53(GRIPPER 3 UNCLAMP)M42M17T4500M60G04P2000 M61G04P3000 M18M43M47(LOADER REVERSE)M66(GRIPPER 4 CLAMP)M44 (LOADER UP)M46(LOADER FORWARD)M45 (LOADER DOWN)M67(GRIPPER 4 UNCLAMP)G04P3000 /M99 M30
N6000M40 M38M36M08M3S27M12G04P5700(HARDENING TIME-3) M10M36M13M39M83IF[#1000EQ1]GOTO100M68N220IF[#1005EQ1]GOTO350G90G01F5000C0.0G90G01F5000C359.9IF[#1004NE1]GOTO220M42M11M69M74T1600(TEMP. POWER) M17M70G04P1800(TEMP TIME)M71M75G90G00F2500C-88.5M68IF[#1000EQ1]GOTO100M11M37M17M64B5650M60G04P1600M72M19P1000 M61M65
M41M09M20M75M43M14M20M69G04P1000 M15M18IF[#1000EQ1]GOTO100M73M20M47(LOADER REVERSE)M66 (GRIPPER 4 CLAMP) M52(GRIPPER 3 CLAMP) M50(GRIPPER 2 CLAMP)M48 (GRIPPER 1 CLAMP)M44 (LOADER UP)M46(LOADER FORWARD)M45 (LOADER DOWN)M67(GRIPPER 4 CLAMP) M53(GRIPPER 3 CLAMP) M51(GRIPPER 2 CLAMP)M49 (GRIPPER 1 UNCLAMP)M85G04P600IF[#1006EQ1]GOTO500M01IF[#1001EQ1]GOTO200GOTO6000 M47M30(PRG END)N100M80N200M81N300M82N350M98P9025 M99M30N500M98P2580 M30
4component transfer at a time
Only one Component transfer at time
Effectiveness of Countermeasure
50
90
72
0
20
40
60
80
100
Target cycle time Before After
Sec
Induction Hardening machine cycle time
Result after kaizen -1
Still Gap is 22 Sec
Countermeasure-2Video captured and analysis was done for operation on Induction Hardening M/c
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72
1 Positioning
2 Heating
3 Quenching
4 PositionIng
5 Heating
6 Quenching
7 Positioning
8 Heating
9 Cooling
10
Cycle Time after action ( Total Cycle Time 72 sec.)
Time (Sec.)
Tempering
Unloading
S.No. Operation
ID Hardening
Slit hardening
Some Operation should be
simultaneously
Operation time is more
Countermeasure-2 cont..
After Kaizen Cycle Time 50 sec.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
1Positioning
2Heating
3Quenching
4PositionIng
5Heating
6Quenching
7Positioning
8Heating
9Cooling
10
Tempering
Unloading
Cycle Time After Condition ( Total Cycle Time 50 sec.)
S.No. OperationTime (Sec.)
ID Hardening
Slit hardening
Loading I.D. Hardening Slit Hardening TemperingUn-Loading
Countermeasure-3
Loading I.D. Hardening Slit Hardening TemperingUn-Loading
Before Condition Cycle Time 50 sec
After Condition Cycle Time 48 sec
Component Loading
Component Loading
Transfer Time 2 sec reduced
Check Result
50
72
48
0
20
40
60
80
Target cycle time Before After
Sec
Induction Hardening machine cycle time
StandardizationDATE(Ori gi n) 1/7/2007 CHECKED By PREPARED BY
Rev. No : 0
Rev da te : -
NEEDED UNITS PER
SHIFTA.K Si ngh Yoges h kuma r
STANDARD IN
PROCESS STOCK
QUALITY CHECK
SAFETY
Sona
Sta nda rd i n proces s
s tock 5
Productionper hour
40
STANDARDIZED WORK CHART
Pa rt No. D040-5911
Proces s Va lve Body Ma chi ni ng
Ta kt Ti me
Cycle Time90 min
1 2 3
DATE(Ori gi n) 1/7/2007 CHECKED By PREPARED BY
Rev. No : 0
Rev da te : -
NEEDED UNITS PER
SHIFTA.K Si ngh Yoges h kuma r
STANDARD IN
PROCESS STOCK
QUALITY CHECK
SAFETY
Sona
Sta nda rd i n proces s
s tock 5
Productionper hour
67.9
STANDARDIZED WORK CHART
Pa rt No. D040-5911
Proces s Va lve Body Ma chi ni ng
Ta kt Ti me
Cycle Time53 min
1 2 3
SWC Before SWC AFTER
Tangible Benefits
40
67.9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Before After
No
s
Productionper Hour
36
0 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Before After
Are
a(M
eter
2) Space Saving
9
11.8
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Before After
Nos
Production perMan Hour
90
0 0
102030405060708090
100
Before After
Ru
pe
s(La
c)
CapitalInvestmentSaving
Intangible benefits
1.Customer requirement fulfilled .
2.Capital investment can be deferred .
3.Highly motivated team
4.Motivated workmen force
5.Encouragement to other Teams
26/49
1. 2.
Future Plans
27/49
Thanks for Kind Attention