Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System

Jennifer Stegman,Assistant Superintendent

Karen Robertson,API Director

Office of Accountability and Assessments

Academic Performance IndexAPI

2 2

G rade s 3 through 8C R T M athem atics

E O I A lgebra I

M a tha p i

G rade s 3 through 8C R T R eadin g

E O I E nglish II

R e ad inga p i

O S T Pa p i

A P C re d ita p i

M ath R em ediatio n

R eading R em ediatio n

C o lleg e R e m e d ia tiona p i

P artic ipatio n

C om positeS core

A C Ta p i

A ca de m ic E xce lle n cea p i

A tte nd an cea p i

D ro po u t R a tea p i

G ra du a tio n R a tea p i

S ch oo l C o m ple tiona p i

A P I

Weighted

average

30%

10%

60%

33.3%

33.3%

33.3%

Academic Performance Index (API) Component Diagram 2007-2008

OSTP – Oklahoma School Testing Program

CRT – Criterion-Referenced Test

EOI – End-of-Instruction Test

AP – Advanced Placement

3

Point Contributions for High School and K-12 Districts

O k lah o m a S ch o o lT e s tin g P ro g ra m (O S T P )

0 -12 0 0 p o in ts

D ro po u t R a te0 -5 0 p o in ts

G ra du a tio n R a te0 -5 0 p o in ts

A tten da n ce R a te0 -5 0 p o in ts

S ch oo l C o m ple tion0 -1 50 po in ts

C o lle ge R em e d ia tio n R a tes0 -1 5 p o in ts

A d van ced P lace m e n t (A P )0 -4 5 p o in ts

A C T0 -9 0 p o in ts

A ca de m ic E xce lle n ce0 -1 50 po in ts

B ase lin e A PI0 -1500

4

Point Contributions for Elementary and Middle Schools,

K-6 and K-8 Districts

O k lah o m a S ch o o lT e s tin g P ro g ra m (O S T P )

0 -13 5 0 p o in ts

A tten da n ce R a te0 -1 50 po in ts

B ase lin e A PI0 -1500 po in ts

5

Adequate Yearly ProgressAYP

7

AYP• Federal Law• Includes all students• Focus on four criteria:

1. Math achievement

2. Reading achievement

3. Participation in state testing

4. Attendance and graduation rates

7 8

Math Performance

Target

Reading Performance

Target

*95% of Students Tested

**Additional Indicator

Performance Target

Mad

e Ad

equ

ate Yearly P

rogressFor each student group, did the school site or district meet the required performance targets?

yes yes yes yes

Did Not Make Adequate Yearly Progress

no no no no

AYP Determinations

*Participation rates calculated separately for math and reading. **Attendance or graduation rate, as applicable.

89

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)Components

Component Measure Benchmarks

2006-2007 2007-2008

Math Performance TargetMath api 932 932

Reading Performance TargetReading api 914 914

Percent of Students Tested

Students tested

Enrollment (Day of Test)

95% 95%

Additional Indicator

Graduation Rate

(High School)

67.8% 67.8%

Attendance

(Elementary & Middle School)

91.2% 91.2%

9 13

10

Student Groups1) All Students2) Regular Education Students3) Black4) American Indian5) Hispanic6) Asian7) White8) Other9) Economically Disadvantaged10) English language learners (ELL)11) Students with Individualized Education

Programs (IEP)

Race/Ethnicity and Economically Disadvantaged subgroups are disaggregated from ALL Students

14