Upper Extremity NCSLesion Localization and Characterization
2019 Annual AANEM MeetingAustin, Texas
Mark A. Ferrante, MDProfessor, Department of Neurology
Co-Director, Neurophysiology FellowshipAssociate Director, Residency Training ProgramUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center
Chief of NeurologySection Chief of Neurophysiology,
Director of ALS ClinicVA Medical Center
Memphis, Tennessee
Disclosures• Gator fan• Publishing royalties
– AANEM• What We Measure and What It Means
– Ferrante, 2012
– Cambridge University Press• Comprehensive Electromyography
– Ferrante, 2018
– Demos Publishing• EMG Lesion Localization and
Characterization– Ferrante and Tsao, 2020
Introduction
• Lesion localization and characterization– The major skills of the EDX provider– Lesion localization – Lesion characterization
• Fiber type involved: sensory or motor• Pathology: Axon loss or demyelination• Severity• Temporal characteristics (needle EMG)
– Acute, subacute, or chronic– Rate of progression
– Introductory material cases
• Mechanisms of nerve injury– Large number
• Pathology and pathophysiology– Limited
• Myelin disruption (demyelination)– Conduction slowing (DMCS)– Conduction block (DMCB)
• Axon disruption (Wallerian degeneration)– Conduction failure– Prior to Wallerian degeneration
» Transient “conduction block” pattern
Nerve Fiber Disruption• Focal demyelination
– Focal effects• Focal axon disruption
– Initially: Focal effects– Later: Distal effects
– Wallerian degeneration
Ferrante MA, Tsao B. EMG Lesion Localization and Characterization, 2020
The pathophysiologies
associated with demyelination
DMCS, uniform
DMCS, non-uniform
DMCB
Forearm
Elbow
Below SG
Above SG
Motor NCS are able to assess long segments of nerve
– Timing of Wallerian degeneration• Motor axon terminals and endplates degenerate first
– NMJ transmission failure occurs before nerve fiber conduction failure
– CMAP abnormalities precede SNAP abnormalities» CMAPs: day 3 to day 7» SNAPs: day 6 to day 10
Ferrante MA. Comprehensive Electromyography9
• NCS identify– Focal DM and early axon disruption
• Between the stimulating and recording sites
– Screens for Wallerian degeneration proximal to these sites
• All the way to the cell bodes of origin
Ferrante. Muscle and Nerve 2004;30:547-568.
ANTERIOR PRIIMARY RAMI C5 C6 C7 C8 T1Proximal Nerve Innervation
Rhomboids (dorsal scapular)Spinati (suprascapular)Deltoid (axillary)Biceps (musculocutaneous)Brachialis (musculocutaneous)
Radial Nerve InnervationBrachioradialisTricepsAnconeusExtensor carpi radialisExtensor pollicis brevisExtensor indicis
Median Nerve InnervationPronator teresFlexor carpi radialisFlexor pollicis longusPronator quadratusAbductor pollicis brevis
Ulnar Nerve InnervationFlexor carpi ulnarisFlexor digitorum profundus (D4,D5)Abductor digiti minimiAdductor polllicisFirst dorsal interosseous
POSTERIOR PRIMARY RAMICervical paraspinal musclesHigh thoracic paraspinal muscles
predominant contributionsometimes significant contributionminor contribution
For the motor NCS
Myotomal charts indicate:
• the root innervation• the nerve innervation
Example: Biceps
Ferrante MA, Tsao B. EMG Lesion Localization and Characterization, 2020
LABC SNAP
Ferrante and Wilbourn, Muscle and Nerve, 1995
Med-D1 SNAP
Ferrante and Wilbourn, Muscle and Nerve, 1995
Superficial Radial SNAP
Ferrante and Wilbourn, Muscle and Nerve, 1995
Med-D2 SNAP
Ferrante and Wilbourn, Muscle and Nerve, 1995
Med-D3 SNAP
Ferrante and Wilbourn, Muscle and Nerve, 1995
Uln-D5 SNAP
Ferrante and Wilbourn, Muscle and Nerve, 1995
MABC SNAP
Ferrante and Wilbourn, Muscle and Nerve, 1995
C6C6>7
C6
C7>6C7
C8T1
Ferrante and Wilbourn, Muscle and Nerve, 1995
C6
C7
C8
T1
C5
Routine Screening NCS of Upper Extremity(Only weakly assesses upper plexus)
Ulnar-ADM
Median-APB
Radial
Med-D2
Uln-D5
C6
C7
C8
T1
C5
NCS Assessment of Upper Plexus
Musculocutaneous-BC
Axillary-Deltoid
LABC (100%)
Med-D1 (100%)
Radial (60%)*
NCS Assessment of Middle Plexus
C6
C7
C8
T1
C5
Med-D2 (80%)*
Med-D3 (70%)
Radial (40%)*
C6
C7
C8
T1
C5
NCS Assessment of Lower Plexus
Uln-D5 (100%)*
MABC (100%)
Radial – distal forearm
Ulnar – ADM or FDI*
Median – APB*
C6
C7
C8
T1
C5
NCS Assessment of Lateral CordLABC (100%)
Med-D1 (100%)
Med-D2 (100%)*
Med-D3 (80%)
Musculocutaneous - BC
C6
C7
C8
T1
C5
NCS Assessment of Posterior Cord
Axillary – Deltoid
Radial – Proximal FA
Radial – Distal FA
Radial (100%)*
C6
C7
C8
T1
C5
NCS Assessment of Medial Cord
Uln-D5 (100%)*
MABC (100%)
Ulnar – ADM/FDI*
Median – APB*
• Which sensory NCS should be done first?– Perform “routine” sensory NCS
+ NCS to address the referral diagnosis+ NCS to address the clinical features
– Based on identified abnormalities, add others• For C6,7 abnormalities (Med-D2; SRN)
– Add LABC and Med-D1• For C8 abnormalities (Uln-D5)
– Add MABC• Add contralateral studies when indicated
EDX CASE STUDIESLocalization
Pathophysiology
Severity
Temporal
Case 1A
• 67yo RH male– Episodic hand numbness and tingling x 5 years, R > L– Present upon awakening– Precipitated by driving– Occur spontaneously while seated at rest
• No neck pain• Examination normal
– Hand sensation – Thenar eminence strength and bulk
• Clinical features– Suggest bilateral CTS, right > left– Dominant limb first and worst
• Exceptions– Profession and hobbies
» Ferrante, Federal Practitioner, 2016;33:10-15
• Start NCS– Screening sensory NCS
• Start with RUE– More symptomatic side– If Median-D2 is normal, add
palmar NCS» More sensitive to CTS
Median-D2Ulnar-D5
Superficial radial
Perform Contralateral NCSMedian-D2
CASE 1A UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUCSENSORY DRG
Median-D2 C6,7 4.2 6.4Ulnar-D5 C8 2.9 6.2
Superficial radial C6,7 2.4 13.5
CASE 1A UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUCSENSORY DRG
Median-D2 C6,7 3.6 12.0 4.2 6.4Ulnar-D5 C8 2.9 6.2
Superficial radial C6,7 2.4 13.5Median Palmar 2.4 18.2Ulnar Palmar 1.9 12.5
Localization Bilateral Median: distal to the wrist stimulation sites
Pathophysiology Demyelinating and axon loss on the right; demyelinating on the left
Severity Mild to mild-moderate on the right and mild on the left
Temporal Chronic by history (this is determined by the needle EMG findings)
Which Motor NCS?Routine motor NCS x RUE
Median-APB x LUE
CASE 1AUPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY
WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUC
SENSORY DRGMedian-D2 C6,7 3.6 12.0 4.2 6.4Ulnar-D5 C8 2.9 6.2
Spfcl radial C6,7 2.4 13.5Median Palmar 2.4 18.2Ulnar Palmar 1.9 12.5
MOTORStim Site
Median-APB Wrist 3.4 7.6 4.1 5.8Elbow 5.5 51
Ulnar-ADM Wrist 2.4 11.4 28.8BE 9.6 52 26.8AE 8.8 53 26.7
Localization Distal to the wrist stimulation site on both sidesPathophysiology DMCS and axon loss on the right, involving the sensory and motor nerve fibers
DMCS on the left, involving the sensory nerve fibersSeverity At least moderate on the right and mild on the leftTemporal Chronic by history
UPPER EXTREMITY NEEDLE EMG WORKSHEET
CASE 1A
Insertional activity Spontaneous Activity MUAP Analysis
Normal IPSWs SCP Other None Fibs Fascs OtherMUAP
RecruitmentMUAP
MorphologyRIGHT
APB X X Normal NormalFDI X X Normal Normal
Pron teres X X Normal Normal
LEFTAPB X X Normal Normal
Case 1A Impression
1. Bilateral Median Neuropathies (e.g., carpal tunnel syndrome)• The above are demyelinating and axon loss in nature on the right
and demyelinating in nature on the left, involve the sensory and motor nerve fibers on the right and the sensory nerve fibers on the left, and are located at or distal to the wrist on both sides.
• Electrically, the abnormalities are moderate in severity on the right and mild in severity on the left.
Case 1B• 56yo RH male
– Episodic hand numbness and tingling x 2 years, R > L– Present upon awakening– Precipitated by driving– Occur spontaneously while seated at rest
• No neck pain• Examination normal
– Hand sensation decreased• Median distribution
– Thenar eminence muscles• Normal strength• Thenar eminence
– Wasting, mild in degree
• Due to time constraints, we will only discuss the ipsilateral findings• Hx s/o CTS
CASE 1B UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUCSENSORY DRG
Median-D2 C6,7 NRUlnar-D5 C8 2.7 12.2
Superficial radial C6,7 2.4 17.8Median Palmar NR
Localization Median nerve, lateral cord, upper plexus, C6/7 DRGPathophysiology Axon loss, sensory nerve fibersSeverity Unclear (at least moderate)Temporal Chronic by history
CASE 1A UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUCSENSORY DRG
Median-D2 C6,7 NRUlnar-D5 C8 2.7 12.2
Superficial radial C6,7 2.4 17.8Median Palmar NR
MOTORStim Site
Median-APB Wrist 4.6 4.8Elbow 4.5 51
Ulnar-ADM Wrist 2.3 10.9BE 10.3 57AE 10.3 58
Localization Median nerve, distal to the stimulation sitePathophysiology Demyelination and axon loss; involves the sensory and motor nerve fibersSeverity Unclear (at least moderate)Temporal Chronic by history
Case 1C• 43yo RH male
– Episodic hand numbness and tingling x 10 years, R > L– Present upon awakening– Precipitated by driving– Occur spontaneously while seated at rest
• No neck pain• Examination normal
– Hand sensation decreased• Median distribution
– Thenar eminence muscles• Normal strength• Severe thenar eminence wasting
• Due to time constraints, we will only discuss the ipsilateral findings• Hx s/o CTS, so continue with motor NCS
CASE 1C UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUCSENSORY DRG
Median-D2 C6,7 NRUlnar-D5 C8 2.8 17.5
Superficial radial C6,7 2.4 24.9Median Palmar NRUlnar Palmar
Localization Median nerve, lateral cord, upper plexus, C6/7 DRGPathophysiology Axon loss, sensory nerve fibersSeverity Unclear (at least moderate)Temporal Chronic by history
CASE 1CUPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY
WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUC
SENSORY DRGMedian-D2 C6,7 NRUlnar-D5 C8 2.8 17.5
Spfcl radial C6,7 2.4 24.9
Median PalmarUlnar Palmar
MOTORStim Site
Median-APB Wrist NRElbow
Ulnar-ADM Wrist 2.4 8.3BE 8.0 53AE 8.0 52
Localization Median nerve at or distal to axillaPathophysiology Axon loss, sensory and motor nerve fibersSeverity SevereTemporal Chronic by history
CASE 1CUPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY
WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUC
SENSORY DRGMedian-D2 C6,7 NRUlnar-D5 C8 2.8 17.5
Spfcl radial C6,7 2.4 24.9
MOTORStim Site
Median-APB Wrist NRElbow
Ulnar-ADM Wrist 2.4 8.3BE 8.0 53AE 8.0 52
Median-L2 Wrist 5.4 1.1
Localization Median nerve at or distal to stimulation sitePathophysiology Axon loss, sensory and motor nerve fibersSeverity SevereTemporal Chronic by history
Case 2• 70yo RH male referred for RH numbness and
weakness– Symptom onset
• 6 weeks ago, immediately following a 2-vessel stenting procedure
– Axillary approach • Examination
– Diminished sensation -- the lateral 3.5 digits (“splits 4”) and thenar eminence
– Severe weakness• Median nerve-innervated hand intrinsic muscles• Anterior interosseous nerve-innervated muscles• Pronator teres and flexor carpi radialis muscles -- normal
strength• Clinical thoughts
– Iatrogenic median neuropathy
CASE 2 UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUCSENSORY DRG
Median-D1 C6 NRMedian-D2 C6,7 NRMedian-D3 C6,7,8 NRUlnar-D5 C8 2.9 15.2
Superficial radial C6,7 2.6 17.4
Localization Median nerve or lateral cordPathophysiology Axon lossSeverity At least moderate-severeTemporal 6 weeks by history
Add LABC sensory NCS to differentiate median nerve
from lateral cord
CASE 2 UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUCSENSORY DRG
Median-D1 C6 NRMedian-D2 C6,7 NRMedian-D3 C6,7,8 NRUlnar-D5 C8 2.9 15.2
Superficial radial C6,7 2.6 17.4LABC C6 2.6 11.2
Localization Median nerve or distal lateral cordPathophysiology Axon lossSeverity At least moderate to moderate-severeTemporal Subacute by history
Motor NCS
Ipsilateral: Routine + Median-L2Contralateral add Median-APB and Median-L2
CASE 2 UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUCSENSORY DRG
Median-D1 C6 NRMedian-D2 C6,7 NRMedian-D3 C6,7,8 NRUlnar-D5 C8 2.9 15.2
Superficial radial C6,7 2.6 17.4LABC C6 2.6 11.2
MOTORStim Site
Median-APB Wrist 3.4 12.6 42.7 4.0 3.2 12.5Elbow 2.8 38 11.2
Ulnar-ADM Wrist 2.5 9.1BE 8.7 53AE 8.7 52
Median-L2 Wrist 3.9 2.2 4.6 0.5
Localization Median nervePathophysiology Axon lossSeverity SevereTemporal Subacute by history
UPPER EXTREMITY NEEDLE EMG WORKSHEET
CASE 2Insertional activity Spontaneous Activity MUAP Analysis
Normal IPSWs SCP Other None Fibs Fascs OtherMUAP
RecruitmentMUAP
Morphology
RIGHTAPB X 3+ Neurogenic, sev NormalFDI X X Normal NormalEI X X Normal Normal
FPL X 3+ Neurogenic, mild NormalPronator teres X X 1+ Normal Normal
BC, LH X X Normal NormalTC, LH X X Normal Normal
FCR X 2+ Normal NormalLumbrical 2 X 3+ Neurogenic, sev Normal
Low cerv psp X X -- --High thor psp X X -- --
Localization Median nervePathophysiology Axon lossSeverity Very severe (based on severity of neurogenic recruitment)Temporal Acute-subacute (high amplitude fibrillation potentials)
Case 2 Impression
1. Right Median Neuropathy• The above is axon loss in nature, involves the sensory and motor nerve
fibers, and is severe in degree.• The lesion involves about 75% of the motor axons to the APB muscle
and 75% of the motor axons to the second lumbrical muscle.• The lesion is located proximal to the departure site of the motor branch
to the pronator teres muscle. Because the median nerve does not give off motor branches in the arm, more precise localization is not possible.
• The lesion is acute to subacute given the high amplitude fibrillation potentials and the lack of chronic changes. This is consistent with the onset reported by the patient.
Case 3
• 70yo RHD male– Awoke with left hand tingling and inability to extend his wrist and
fingers 25 days ago– Examination
• Decreased sensation superficial radial nerve distribution• Weakness of wrist extension without radial deviation• Forearm extension strength is normal
CASE 3 UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUCSENSORY DRG
Median-D2 C6,7 3.3 18.1Ulnar-D5 C8 2.7 10.8
Superficial radial C6,7 2.5 21.6 2.6 28.7
• The sensory NCS are normal• The superficial radial response asymmetry is of unclear
significance• It may reflect axon loss, but if so it is minimal-mild in degree
• Can proceed to motor BCS• Routine left motor NCS• Add the distal and proximal radial motor responses
bilaterally
CASE 3 UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUC
SENSORY DRGMedian-D2 C6,7 3.3 18.1Ulnar-D5 C8 2.7 10.8
Spfcl Radial C6,7 2.5 21.6 2.6 28.7
MOTOR Stim SiteMedian-APB Wrist 3.6 8.7
Elbow 8.6 54.2Ulnar-ADM Wrist 2.8 7.2
Elbow 7.1 55.3Radial-EI Mid-FA 2.1 4.0 28.9 2.2 6.4 32.9
Elbow 3.8 28.2Below SG 3.8 27.7Above SG 0.8 3.8
Radial-ED Elbow 2.7 6.2 40.0 2.6 7.1 45.6Below SG 5.7 38.5Above SG 1.1 8.4
Localization Spiral groovePathophysiology DMCB; possible minor axon loss (< 10%)Severity Severe for the DMCBTemporal 25 days based on history
UPPER EXTREMITY NEEDLE EMG WORKSHEET
CASE 3
Insertional activity Spontaneous Activity MUAP Analysis
Normal
IPSWs
SCP Other None Fibs
Fascs
OtherMUAP
RecruitmentMUAP
Morphology
LEFTFDI X X Normal NormalEI X 3+ Severe neurogenic Normal
FPL X X Normal NormalPron teres X X Normal NormalBC, LH X X Normal NormalTC, LH X X Normal Normal
Deltoid, MH X X Normal NormalBrachiorad 3+ Severe neurogenic NormalECR-longus X 3+ Severe neurogenic Normal
ED X 2+ Severe neurogenic NormalAnconeus X X Normal Normal
Low C psp X X -- --High T psp X X -- --
RIGHTEI X X Normal Normal
Brachiorad X X Normal Normal
Localization Spiral groovePathophysiology DMCB >> axon lossSeverity Severe for the DMCB; mild for the axon lossTemporal c/w the 25 days reported
Radial-EI Mid-FA 2.1 4.0 28.9 2.2 6.4 32.9Elbow 3.8 28.2
Below SG 3.8 27.7Above SG 0.8 3.8
Radial-ED Elbow 2.7 6.2 40.0 2.6 7.1 45.6Below SG 5.7 38.5Above SG 1.1 8.4
Calculating Severity
For the motor axons to the EDC muscleAXON LOSS: 1 - 40.0/45.6 = 1 - 0.88 = 0.12 = 12%
DMCB: 1 - 8.4/38.5 = 1 - 0.22 = 0.78 = 0.78 X 0.88 = 69%NORMAL: 100% - 81%= 19%
For the motor axons to the EI muscleAXON LOSS: 1 – 28.9/32.9 = 1 - 0.88 = 0.12 = 12%
DMCB: 1 – 3.8/27.7 = 1 – 0.14 = 0.86 = 0.86 X 0.88 = 76%NORMAL: 100% - 88% = 12%
Case 3 Impression
1. Left Radial Neuropathy• The above is demyelinating conduction block >> axon loss in
nature, involves the motor nerve fibers (and the sensory nerve fibers by clinical examination), is located within the spiral groove, and is severe in degree for the demyelinating conduction block component and mild for the axon loss component.
• The findings are consistent with the 25-day onset reported by the patient.
Case 4
• 52yo RHD female x left UE numbness and weakness– Pacemaker placement 2 months ago– Symptoms started immediately after procedure
• Weakness– Forearm flexion (C5,6-MC) and pronation (C6,7-median)
• Numbness along the lateral aspect of the forearm (LABC) and hand (median and radial)
– Sparing the skin overlying the FDI muscle
CASE 4 UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUCSENSORY DRGMedian-D2 C6,7 3.1 8.6Ulnar-D5 C8 2.8 12.3
Superficial radial C6,7 2.4 20.0
INTERPRETATION
• The Med-D2 response is reduced in amplitude• POTENTIAL LOCALIZATION
• Median nerve, lateral cord, upper/middle plexus, C6,7 DRG
ARE FURTHER SENSORY NCS INDICATED?
• C6,7 DRG add LABC and Med-D1 sensory NCS• On the contralateral side
• Med-D2 for comparison purposes• LABC and Med-D1
IS THIS CTS?
CASE 4UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY WORKSHEET
LEFT RIGHTNCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUC
SENSORY DRG
Median-D2 C6,7 3.1 8.6 3.0 28.3
Ulnar-D5 C8 2.8 12.3
Superficial radial C6,7 2.4 20.0
LABC C6 2.7 5.1 2.5 16.5
Median-D1 C6 3.2 7.2 3.1 21.9
Localization Lateral cord > upper plexus, C6 DRGPathophysiology Axon lossSeverity At least moderate (severity is best addressed by the motor NCS)Temporal 2 months by history
Which motor NCS should be performed?• Ipsilateral: Routine NCS; Musculocutaneous-BC; Axillary-Deltoid• Contralateral: Musculocutaneous-BC; Axillary-Deltoid
CASE 4 UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY WORKSHEET
LEFT RIGHTNCS
PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUC
SENSORY DRGMedian-D2 C6,7 3.1 8.6 3.0 28.3Ulnar-D5 C8 2.8 12.3
Superficial radial C6,7 2.4 20.0 2.5 24.1LABC C6 2.7 5.1 2.5 16.5
Median-D1 C6 3.2 7.2 3.1 21.9
MOTORStim Site
Median-APB Wrist 3.5 7.2Elbow 7.1 56
Ulnar-ADM Wrist 2.8 8.3Elbow 8.1 54
Musculo-BC Axilla 3.8 2.7 3.6 5.6SCF 2.6 56
Axillary-Deltoid SCF 4.1 9.2 3.9 8.6
Localization Lateral cordPathophysiology Axon lossSeverity Moderate-severe (1 - 2.7/5.6) x 100% = 52% motor axons to bicepsTemporal 2 months by history
UPPER EXTREMITY NEEDLE EMG WORKSHEET
CASE 35Insertional activity Spontaneous Activity MUAP Analysis
Normal IPSWs SCP Other None Fibs Fascs OtherMUAP
RecruitmentMUAP
MorphologyLEFT
FDI X X Normal NormalEI X X Normal Normal
FPL X X Normal NormalPron teres X 3+ Normal NormalBC, LH X 3+ Mild neurogenic Normal
FCR X 2+ Normal NormalTC, LH X X Normal Normal
Deltoid, MH X X Normal NormalBrachioradialis X X Normal NormalInfraspinatus X X Normal Normal
Low cerv psp X X -- --High thor psp X X -- --
RIGHTPron teres X X Normal NormalBC, LH X X Normal Normal
Brachioradialis X X Normal NormalDeltoid, MH X X Normal Normal
Localization Lateral cordPathophysiology Axon lossSeverity Moderate-severe (1 - 2.7/5.6) x 100% = 52% motor axons to bicepsTemporal Lack of collateral sprouting supports the 2-month history reported
1. Lateral Cord Brachial Plexus Lesion
The above is axon loss in nature, involves the sensory and motor nerve fibers, and
is moderate-severe in degree. The temporal features of the abnormalities are
consistent with an onset two months ago as reported by the patient(i.e., there is no
EDX evidence of reinnervation through collateral sprouting).
Case 4 Impression
Case 5
• 41yo LHD female– Fell onto outstretched left UE 1 month ago– Subjective
• Numbness along the medial hand and forearm• Weakness of grip
– Examination• Medial hand and medial forearm numbness• Hand weakness, including FDP-D4• Extensor indicis weakness
– Start with routine sensory NCS
CASE 5UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY
WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUC
SENSORY DRGMedian-D2 C6,7 3.1 30.3Ulnar-D5 C8 NRS-Radial C6,7 2.3 21.5
Localization Ulnar nerve, medial cord, lower plexus, C8 DRGPathophysiology Axon lossSeverity At least mild-moderate (motor NCS are best for severity assessment)Temporal 1 month by history
When the Ulnar-D5 is abnormal, add the MABCIf the MABC is normal, add the DUC
Add the contralateral MABC
CASE 5UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY
WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUC
SENSORY DRGMedian-D2 C6,7 3.1 30.3Ulnar-D5 C8 NRS-Radial C6,7 2.3 21.5MABC T1 NR 2.4 12.4
Localization Medial cord, lower plexus, C8/T1 DRGPathophysiology Axon lossSeverity At least moderate (motor NCS are best for severity assessment)Temporal 1 month by history
What motor NCS?
Ipsilateral: routine NCS, Ulnar-FDI, Radial-EIContralateral: Ulnar-ADM, Ulnar-FDI, Radial-EI
C6
C7
C8
T1
C5
Case 5 – Sensory Responses
Upper trunk
Middle trunk
Lower trunk
Lateral cord
Posteriorcord
Medial cord
CCF© 2002
CASE 5 UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUC
SENSORY DRGMedian-D2 C6,7 3.1 30.3Ulnar-D5 C8 NR 2.8 14.4S-Radial C6,7 2.3 21.5MABC T1 NR 2.4 12.4
MOTORStim Site
Median-APB Wrist 3.6 4.6 3.5 13.7Elbow 4.4 54 13.7
Ulnar-ADM Wrist 2.9 4.2 2.9 12.5AE 4.1 52 12.4
Ulnar-FDI Wrist 3.9 5.1 3.7 9.2AE 5.1 55 9.2
Radial-EI Forearm 1.7 1.3 1.8 4.3Elbow 1.3 51 4.3
Localization Lower plexusPathophysiology Axon lossSeverity SevereTemporal 1 month by history (best determined by needle EMG)
UPPER EXTREMITY NEEDLE EMG WORKSHEET
CASE 5Insertional activity Spontaneous Activity MUAP Analysis
Normal IPSWs SCP Other None Fibs Fascs OtherMUAP
RecruitmentMUAP
MorphologyLEFTAPB X 2+ Mod neurogenic NormalFDI X 3+ Mod neurogenic NormalEI X 3+ Sev neurogenic Normal
FPL X 3+ Mod neurogenic NormalPron teres X X Normal NormalBC, LH X X Normal NormalTC, LH X 1+ Normal Normal
Low C psp X X -- --High T psp X X -- --
RIGHTAPB X X Normal NormalFDI X X Normal NormalEI X X Normal Normal
Localization Lower plexusPathophysiology Axon lossSeverity SevereTemporal c/w the 1 month history reported by the patient (no collateral sprouting)
Case 6• 26yo RHD female x LUE pain and numbness• Aching pain x 10 years
– Medial aspect of the left arm and forearm• Numbness x several years
– Intermittent, medial aspect of the left forearm and hand– Precipitated by supine
• Left thenar eminence atrophy– Noticed by her friend
• Weakness– D1 abduction, D1 flexion, D2 extension, finger abduction
• Sensation– Diminished along the medial aspect of the forearm and hand
• Routine sensory NCS
CASE 6UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY
WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUC
SENSORY DRGMedian-D2 C6,7 3.1 51Ulnar-D5 C8 2.7 16S-Radial C6,7 2.2 59
The screening sensory NCS are normalThe Ulnar-D5 response is suspicious
Collect a contralateral Ulnar-D5 response
CASE 6UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY
WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUC
SENSORY DRGMedian-D2 C6,7 3.1 51Ulnar-D5 C8 2.7 16 2.6 41.7S-Radial C6,7 2.2 59
Add MABC (possibly bilaterally)If normal, add DUC
CASE 6UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY
WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUC
SENSORY DRGMedian-D2 C6,7 3.1 51.5Ulnar-D5 C8 2.7 16.1 2.6 41.7S-Radial C6,7 2.2 59.3MABC T1 NR 2.5 15.8
Localization Medial cord or lower plexusPathophysiology Axon lossSeverity Absent for MABC; relatively abnormal for Ulnar-D5 (T1 > C8)Temporal Chronic by history (best determined by needle EMG)
What motor NCS?Ipsilateral: routine, Ulnar-FDI; Radial-EI
(for localization)
Contralateral: Ulnar-ADM, Ulnar-FDI, and Radial-EI NCS(for severity assessment)
CASE 6 UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUC
SENSORY DRGMedian-D2 C6,7 3.1 51.5Ulnar-D5 C8 2.7 16.1 2.6 41.7S-Radial C6,7 2.2 59.3MABC T1 NR 2.5 15.8
MOTOR Stim SiteMedian-APB Wrist 3.6 2.2 3.5 12.4
Elbow 2.1 51 12.4 52Ulnar-ADM Wrist 2.7 8.3 2.7 14.1
AE 8.1 53 14.0 56Ulnar-FDI Wrist 4.2 7.9 4.1 15.3
AE 7.9 54 15.1 54Radial-EI Forearm 1.6 2.1 1.7 4.6
Elbow 2.1 52 4.6 53
Localization Lower plexusPathophysiology Axon lossSeverity Severe (T1 > C8)Temporal Chronic by history (best determined by needle EMG)
UPPER EXTREMITY NEEDLE EMG WORKSHEET
CASE 33Insertional activity Spontaneous Activity MUAP Analysis
Normal IPSWs SCP Other None Fibs Fascs OtherMUAP
RecruitmentMUAP
MorphologyLEFTAPB X 3+ Severe neurogenic Severe CMALFDI X 1+ Mild neurogenic Moderate CMALEI X 1+ Mod neurogenic Moderate CMAL
FPL X 2+ Mod neurogenic Moderate CMALPron teres X X Normal NormalBC, LH X X Normal NormalTC, LH X X Normal Mild CMAL
Low cerv psp X X -- --High thor psp X X -- --
RIGHTAPB X X Normal NormalFDI X X Normal NormalEI X X Normal Normal
TC, LH X X Normal Normal
Localization Lower plexusPathophysiology Axon lossSeverity Severe (T1 > C8)Temporal Chronic (as reported by the patient) and progressive
Ferrante MA, Tsao B. EMG Lesion Localization and Characterization, 2020
Case 7
• 71yo RHD male x suspected post-operative left ulnar neuropathy– Open heart surgery 26 days ago – Left grip weakness– Numbness along the medial aspect of the left hand
– Examination (not provided)• Check cutaneous distributions of ulnar and MABC nerves• Check strength of ulnar, FPL, and EI muscles
CASE 7UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY
WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV
nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUC
SENSORY DRGMedian-D2 C6,7 3.0 14.7Ulnar-D5 C8 NR
Superficial radial C6,7 2.5 18.3
Add MABC (possibly bilaterally)If normal, add DUC (likely bilaterally
CASE 7UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY
WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUC
SENSORY DRGMedian-D2 C6,7 3.0 14.7Ulnar-D5 C8 NR
Superficial radial C6,7 2.5 18.3MABC T1 2.7 11.6 2.7 10.3DUC C8 NR 2.9 7.3
Localization Ulnar nerve, medial cord, lower plexusPathophysiology Axon lossSeverity Moderate-severe (best determined by motor NCS)Temporal 26 days, per history provided by patient and referring physician
What motor NCS?Ipsilateral: Routine, Ulnar-FDI; Radial-EI
(for localization)
Contralateral: Ulnar-ADM, Ulnar-FDI, and +/- Radial NCS(for severity assessment)
CASE 7 UPPER EXTREMITY NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY WORKSHEETLEFT RIGHT
NCS PERFORMED LAT AMP CV nAUC LAT AMP CV nAUCSENSORY DRGMedian-D2 C6,7 3.0 14.7Ulnar-D5 C8 NR 8.1 8.1
Superficial radial C6,7 2.5 18.3MABC T1 2.7 11.6DUC C8 NR 2.9 7.3
MOTOR Stim SiteMedian-APB Wrist 3.7 7.3 3.6 9.1
Elbow 7.3 54 8.9 53Ulnar-ADM Wrist 3.0 4.6 2.9 10.4
Elbow 4.5 55 10.1 58Ulnar-FDI Wrist 3.9 4.1 3.9 8.6
Elbow 4.1 51 8.6 54Radial-EI Forearm 2.3 1.1 2.2 3.4
Localization Lower plexusPathophysiology Axon lossSeverity SevereTemporal 26 days, as reported by the patient and the referring physician
UPPER EXTREMITY NEEDLE EMG WORKSHEET
CASE 7Insertional activity Spontaneous Activity MUAP Analysis
Normal IPSWs SCP Other None Fibs Fascs OtherMUAP
RecruitmentMUAP
MorphologyLEFTAPB X 2+ Mild neurogenic NormalFDI 2+ 3+ Mild neurogenic NormalEI 1+ 3+ Mod neurogenic Normal
FPL X 2+ Mod neurogenic NormalPron teres X X Normal NormalBC, LH X X Normal NormalTC, LH X 2+ Normal Normal
Low C psp X X -- --High T psp X X -- --
RIGHTAPB X X Normal NormalFDI X X Normal NormalEI X X Normal NormalTC X X Normal Normal
Localization Lower plexusPathophysiology Axon lossSeverity SevereTemporal c/w the 26 days reported by the patient and referring provider (no CMAL)
Il FineQuestions