Date post: | 24-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | rosemary-french |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Urban Containment – American Style(s)
Dr. Arthur C. Nelson, FAICP
Professor & Director, Urban Affairs & Planning
Virginia Tech – Alexandria Center
Regional Leadership Institute
Urban Containment – God’s Will?
“The Lord said to Moses . . . Command the people of Israel, that they give to the Levites
. . . cities to dwell in; and pasture lands round about the cities . . . The pasture lands of the cities . . . shall
reach from the wall of the city outward . . . all around.
“The city shall be in the middle…”
Numbers 35: 1-5.
Goals of Urban Containment
• Preserve public goods.
• Minimize adverse land use interactions and maximize positive ones.
• Minimize taxpayer exposure.
• Distribute benefits & burdens equitably.
• Improve overall quality of life.
“Best” Containment Practices
• Urban Growth Containment Boundary
• Resource land preservation
• Infill, redevelopment, aka “refill”
• Inclusionary housing
• Regional asset sharing
• Multi-modal accessibility
• Responsiveness to change
Emerging Empirical Evidence
• Containment/growth management improves economic development.
• Containment prevents beltways & increases retail/service trade.
• Containment increases farming.• Containment reduces racial segregation.
• Containment makes jobs more accessible to low/mod-incomes.
• Containment eliminates blight.
Downsides
• Threatens existing neighborhoods.• Raises housing prices by making area more
attractive & economically efficient.• Can decrease homeownership (though just
the opposite can also happen).• Increases infrastructure costs in near-term.
• Pushes some economic activities out.• Reduces opportunity to live on large lots.
Different Flavors of Urban Containment
• Urban Services & Facilities• Urban Growth Phasing
• Rural Growth Management• Rural/Open Space Preservation• Intergovernmental Agreements
Urban Services & Facilities
• Urban Service Area
• Infrastructure Phasing
• Municipal Boundary
• Level of Service Standards
• Spatial Capital Investment
• Special Service Districts
• State Priority Funding Areas
Urban Service AreaUrban Service Area
• Limits geographic extent of service.
• Rural areas denied urban services.
• Typical of water and wastewater.
InfrastructureInfrastructure PhasingPhasing
• Plans for location and timing of future urban service extensions.
• Plan is basis for capital improvement investments.
• Example: Sioux Falls, SD, 2015 Growth Management Plan.
Municipal BoundaryMunicipal Boundary
• Key facilities and services provided only by municipality.
• Access to key facilities and services attained only through annexation.
• Example is Lincoln, Nebraska.
Level of Service StandardsLevel of Service Standards
• Performance standards for urban services vary spatially between “urban” and “rural”
land uses.
• Example: Palm Beach County, Florida, where rural areas are not allowed to have
public/community water and sewer.
Spatial Capital InvestmentSpatial Capital Investment
• Focuses new infrastructure investments in existing or planned urban areas.
• Example: Maryland’s “priority” investment areas.
• Example: Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission.
Special Service DistrictsSpecial Service Districts
• Sole provider of key public facilities and services.
• Adopts policy of limiting infrastructure extensions to areas targeted for urban
development.
• De factor urban service limits.
• Example: Baltimore County, Maryland.
State Priority Funding Areas
• State infrastructure investments targeted to urban and urbanizing areas based on state
criteria.
• Local governments may invest in other areas but at their own expense.
• Maryland statewide for roads, water, sewer and schools.
• Colorado in metropolitan areas for transportation.
Urban Growth Phasing
• Tiered Growth Strategy
• Urban Reserve District
• Public Land Management
Tiered Growth StrategyTiered Growth Strategy
• “Rings” of development intensity and infrastructure provision.
• Pricing strategies often used.
• Example: Tucson’s “central core”, “mid-city”, “evolving city” and “future city” tiers
each with different planning and design standards.
Urban Reserve DistrictUrban Reserve District
• Special areas reserved for future urban-scale development at the urban fringe.
• Usually reserved through large lot zoning, nonurban infrastructure, and “shadow”
platting.• At appropriate time, urban infrastructure
installed and urban scale development allowed.• Example: San Luis Obispo.
Public Land ManagementPublic Land Management
• Preserve publicly-owned land from development.
• Potentially “trading” some publicly-owned land where development should occur with
owners of rural land where development should not.
• Example: Pima County, Arizona.
Rural Growth Management
• Agriculture/Open Space District
• Urban Fringe Resource Management
• Rural Growth Monitoring
Agriculture/Open Space DistrictAgriculture/Open Space District
• Exclusive farm, forest, and other open space uses allowed.
• Very large minimum lot sizes.
• No or few “urban” residences allowed.
• Example: Wicomico County, Maryland.
Urban Fringe Resource Urban Fringe Resource ManagementManagement
• Overlay district in rural areas where new development reviewed under stringent
standards to protect habitat, sensitive landscapes, etc.
• Resource management plans required.
• Example: Chico, California.
Rural Growth MonitoringRural Growth Monitoring
• Projected demand for legitimate development of rural lands undertaken.
• Selected rural lands allocated for low density urban development not using key
urban facilities and services.
• Example: King County, Washington.
Rural/Open Space Preservation
• Transfer of Development Rights
• Purchase of Development Rights
• Urban Fringe Land Acquisition
• Urban/Rural Buffer
• Community Separator
Transfer of Development RightsTransfer of Development Rights
• Development rights are assigned to rural “sending” areas but cannot be exercised
unless purchased by developer and transferred to urban “receiving” areas.
• Example: Pinelands, New Jersey.
Purchase of Development RightsPurchase of Development Rights
• Development rights assigned through a planning process based on reasonable
factors are purchased by local government through a voluntary purchase program.
• Can also include privately donated conservation easements.
• Example: King County, Washington.
Urban Fringe Land AcquisitionUrban Fringe Land Acquisition
• Urban fringe land identified and targeted for acquisition in conscientious effort to contain urban development.
• Special state and regional funds typically used, but sometimes done by local government.
• Examples: Boulder, Colorado; Maryland.
Urban/Rural BufferUrban/Rural Buffer
• Small scale greenbelt edge around city.• Land acquired through combination of
acquisition and donation with conservation easement.
• Privately owned land not provided with key urban services and limited to open space
uses.• Example: Davis, California.
Community SeparatorCommunity Separator
• Narrow band of open space separating one community from another.
• Land uses restricted to nonurban activities; no urban services allowed. Essentially
large lot residential zoning but with some land acquisition.
• Example: Sonoma County, California.
Intergovernmental Agreements
• Joint Planning Areas
• Spheres of Influence
• Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
Joint Planning AreasJoint Planning Areas
• Municipalities agree on land use development affecting unincorporated
areas.
• Agreements implemented through inter-local agreement enforceable by any party.
Spheres of InfluenceSpheres of Influence
• State designates future annexations areas of municipalities and creates independent board
to assure that development in affected unincorporated areas are consistent with
overall development plans of the relevant municipalities.
• Example: California, Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo).
Extraterritorial JurisdictionExtraterritorial Jurisdiction
• Legislature authorizes municipalities to review and approve subdivisions,
rezoning requests, and other land use actions in unincorporated areas within 1-
5 miles typically.
• Example: Eau Claire, Wisconsin.
American-Style
Urban Containment
Is Creative & Flexible
But what Really Works?