EXISTING URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT

1. Background

2. Existing Urban Public Transport in Indonesia

3. Compared to developed countries

4. Urban Public Transport Reform in Indonesia

5. Urban Public Transport Planning

6. Urban Public Transport Modeling

Back ground

It is necessary to improve public transport facility

Which one is better ?

51 cars85 passengers

1 Bus85 passengers

Case study

in Bandung

Public Transport in Bandung

Most of public transport buses: small buses (angkot)Number of buses: over 4700Population: 2.6 million38 licensed routesRoute length: 9.5 – 26.5 kmBus frequencies high, average headway 2.2 minutesAverage load factor 68 %High proportion of public transport trip: 63 %Less evening busesFare: according to the distance, but no seasonal ticket

Case study

in Yogyakarta

Public Transport in Yogyakarta(before the operation of Trans Jogja)

Most of public transport: medium busesNumber of buses: 591Population: 1.1 million19 licensed routes, only 16 routes operatedRoute length: 25 – 62 kmBus frequencies high, average headway in the city center 12 secondsAverage load factor low (24 %)Five years ago: 36 %Only high load factor during peak hourNo evening bus: security problems (pick pocket)Flat fare, no seasonal ticket

Organization

ORGANDA: the only organization represent the road transport sectorOnly in resolving formal public transport issues: fares and route arrangementsIt represents owners and operators of taxi and busesFor urban city buses: 5 cooperatives under ORGANDAEvery bus owners must be a member of a cooperative.No timetable Bus route plan: the jurisdiction of DISHUB (provincial road transport and traffic unit), after negotiation with ORGANDA and cooperatives.Difficult to change the routes because of the difficulty in negotiations

The reason, using public transportThe reason, using public transport

no alternative

48.0%

cheap

18.5%

comfortability

17.3%

Flexibility

To stop

4.0%

others

0.6%

faster

11.6%

For non public transport users: Are you going to use the For non public transport users: Are you going to use the buses if the quality is better than the existing one ?buses if the quality is better than the existing one ?

Non public transport users

Yes

54.5%

No

45.5%

OTHER CITIES

IN INDONESIA

WAJAH TRANSPORTASI KOTAPublic Transport in Jakarta

Balikpapan

Manado

Pekanbaru

Sarbagita area (Denpasar, Badung, Gianyar and Tabanan)

Stop anywhere

Batubulan terminal

Tramway in SurabayaIt was closed in 1968

PT KERETA API ( Persero )DAERAH OPERASI VIII SURABAYA

JAWA TIMURJAWA TIMUR

BOJO

NEG

ORO

BABA

T

LAM

ON

GA

N

SURA

BAYA

PAS

ARTU

RIKA

LIMAS

SURABAYA KOTASURABAYA GUBENGSIDOTOPO

WONOKROMOKA

PAS

SUM

BERR

EJO

BOW

ERN

O

GEM

BON

GPU

CU

K

SUM

LARA

N

DU

DU

K

CER

ME

BEN

OW

O

TANDES

WARUGEDANGAN

SIDOARJOTANGGULANGIN

PORONG

BANGIL

WONOKERTO

KANDANGANBETENG

SUKOREJO

SENGON

LAWANGSINGOSARI

BLIMBING

MALANGM

ALA

NG

KO

TALA

MA

PAKI

SAJI

KEPA

NJE

NN

GEB

RUK

SUM

BERP

UC

UN

G

POG

AJI

H

KESA

MBE

N

WLI

NG

I

TALU

N

GA

RUM

BLIT

AR

TULUNGAGUNG

KEDIRI

SEPANJANGBOHARAN

KRIANKEDINDING

GO

ND

AN

GLE

GI

DA

MPI

T

MALANGJAGALAN

TARIK

MO

JOKE

RTO

JOM

BAN

G

KERT

OSO

NO

NG

AN

JUK

MA

DIU

N

KEDUNGPRING

BLULUK

NGIMBANG

KAMBANGAN

PLOSO

JOMBANGKOTA

WA

LIKU

KUN

PASURUAN

PROBOLINGGO

JEM

BER

BONDOWOSO

SITUBONDO

BAN

YUW

AN

GI B

ARU

JAW

A T

EN

GA

HSR

AG

EN

CEP

U

KAM

AL BANGKALAN

PAMEKASANTELANG

BATAS WILAYAH DAOP VIII SBDENGAN DAOP IV SM (KM 126+100)

BATAS WILAYAH DAOP VIII SBDENGAN DAOP VII MN (KM 64+200)

BATAS WILAYAH DAOP VIII SBDENGAN DAOP VII MN

(KM 134+300)

BATAS WILAYAH DAOP VIII SBDENGAN DAOP IX JR

(KM 48+400)

INDRO

GRE

SIK

CU

RAH

MA

LAN

GSU

MO

BITO

PETE

RON

GA

N

SEM

BUN

GBARON

SUKO

MO

RO

BAG

OR

WIL

AN

GA

N

SARA

DA

N

CA

RUBA

N

BABA

DA

N

BARA

T

GEN

ENG

PARO

N

KED

UN

GG

ALA

R

PURWOASRI

PAPAR

MINGGIRAN

SUSUHAN

NGADILUWIH

KRAS

NGUJANG

SUM

BERG

EMPO

L

NG

UN

UT

REJO

TAN

GA

N

REJOSO

GRATI

BAYEMAN

LECES

MALASAN

RANUYOSO

KLAKAH

MAN

GLI

RAN

DUAG

UNG

JATI

ROTO

TAN

GG

ULBA

NG

SALS

ARI

RAM

BIPU

JI

ARJ

OSO

KOTO

K

KALI

SAT

LED

OKO

MBO

SEM

POLA

N

GA

RAH

AN

MRA

WA

N

KALI

BARU

GLE

NM

ORE

SUM

BERW

AD

UN

G

KALI

SETA

ILTE

MU

GU

RUH

SIN

GO

JURU

H

ROG

OJA

MPI

KARA

NG

ASE

M

ARG

OPU

RO

PANARUKAN

PRAJEKAN

BONOSARE

GRUJUGAN

TAMANAN

SUKOWONO

DATA LINTAS DAOP VIII SURABAYA

PANJANG LINTAS :SURABAYAPASARTURI-BOJONEGORO : 103,25 KMSURABAYA KOTA-MOJOKERTO : 51,25 KMWONOKROMO-BLITAR : 180,43 KMJUMLAH STASIUN : 51 UNIT

: TIDAK OPERASIONALJUMLAH TRACK : 353 KMJUMLAH PERLINTASAN : 917 UNIT

DATA LINTAS DAOP VIII SURABAYA

PANJANG LINTAS :SURABAYAPASARTURI-BOJONEGORO : 103,25 KMSURABAYA KOTA-MOJOKERTO : 51,25 KMWONOKROMO-BLITAR : 180,43 KMJUMLAH STASIUN : 51 UNIT

: TIDAK OPERASIONALJUMLAH TRACK : 353 KMJUMLAH PERLINTASAN : 917 UNIT

PETA DAERAH OPERASI VIII SURABAYA

Timing Indicator

Desirable path

Do-nothing-path

Feasible

Publ

ic T

rans

port

mod

e sh

are

Difficult

Unfeasible

AppropriateEarly Late

Feasible

source: Morichi, 2007

Timing for Public Transport Investment