+ All Categories
Home > Documents > US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis...

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis...

Date post: 03-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: crystal-wilcox
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
26
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions Res. and Engr. Lab. (CRREL) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers January 2011
Transcript
Page 1: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

US Army Corps of Engineers

BUILDING STRONG®

Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis

Carrie Vuyovich and Steven DalyERDC-CRREL

Cold Regions Res. and Engr. Lab. (CRREL)U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

January 2011

Page 2: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Overview

Background Multiple linear regression analysis to forecast spring

inflows to reservoirs 6 snow-dominated watersheds Monthly forecasts beginning in January

Goals Update regressions with recent data, improve accuracy Develop better estimate of SWE Work towards a more automated process Identify possible climate trends

Page 3: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Page 4: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Parameters

• Q (106 ac-ft) = Forecasted total volume inflow to reservoir (+ Holdouts)

• SWE (in) = Average station SWE on first of month• ANTQ (106 ac-ft) = Total antecedent inflow from Oct – Nov of previous year

(+ Holdouts)

• ANTPREC (in) = Total annual precipitation in previous year

• P (in) = Total precipitation since beginning of year

1 1

1 1

OCT NOV DEC OCT

OCT NOV OCT NOV

APR JUL APR JUL AUG APR

APR JUL APR JUL

Holdout Storage Storage Storage

AntQ Inflow Holdouts

Holdout Storage Storage Storage

Q Inflow Holdouts

Holdout Calculation:

Page 5: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Canyon Ferry

Average monthly total precipitation (in)

Area = 15,886 mi2

Average Apr-Jul total volume inflow = 1.9 M ac-ft (2 M ac-ft Natural)

Average Oct-Nov total volume inflow = 0.56 M ac-ft (0.56 M ac-ft Natural)

Precip (in) Jan Feb Mar Apr May JunAverage 0.56 0.46 0.89 1.41 2.30 2.49

SWE (in) 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-JunAverage 7.35 10.65 13.32 16.59 16.87 8.84

Page 6: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Canyon Ferry

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

Canyon Ferry1 Jan Forecast

Actual inflow Observed Natural Inflow

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

Canyon Ferry1 Feb Forecast

Actual inflow Observed Natural Inflow

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

Canyon Ferry1 Mar Forecast

Actual inflow Observed Natural Inflow

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

Canyon Ferry1 Apr Forecast

Actual inflow Observed Natural Inflow

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

Canyon Ferry1 May Forecast

Actual inflow Observed Natural Inflow

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

Canyon Ferry1 June Forecast

Actual inflow Observed Natural Inflow

Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July

Results Without Holdouts R2 0.43 0.55 0.55 0.63 0.71 0.75 0.84Std dev error 0.66 0.60 0.61 0.55 0.49 0.45 0.37

Page 7: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Clark Canyon

Average monthly total precipitation (in)

Area = 2,315 mi2

Average Apr-Jul total volume inflow = 0.08 M ac-ft (0.09 M ac-ft Natural)

Average Oct-Nov total volume inflow = 0.04 M ac-ft (0.05 M ac-ft Natural)

Precip (in) Jan Feb Mar Apr May JunAverage 0.33 0.26 0.57 1.08 1.86 1.73

SWE (in) 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-JunAverage 5.93 8.49 10.56 13.15 12.89 4.72

Page 8: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Clark Canyon

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.3519

77

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

Clark Canyon1 Jan Forecast

Actual inflow Observed Natural Inflow

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

Clark Canyon1 FebForecast

Actual inflow Observed Natural Inflow

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

Clark Canyon1 Mar Forecast

Actual inflow Observed Natural Inflow

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

Clark Canyon1 Apr Forecast

Actual inflow Observed Natural Inflow

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

Clark Canyon1 May Forecast

Actual inflow Observed Natural Inflow

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

Clark Canyon1 June Forecast

Actual inflow Observed Natural Inflow

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul

R2 0.54 0.55 0.51 0.60 0.66 0.67 0.72Std dev error 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03

Page 9: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Tiber

Average monthly total precipitation (in)

Area = 4,724 mi2

Average Apr-Jul total volume inflow = 0.43 M ac-ft

Average Oct-Nov total volume inflow = 0.04 M ac-ft

Precip (in) Jan Feb Mar Apr May JunAverage 0.37 0.28 0.51 0.92 2.02 2.56

SWE (in) Jan Feb Mar Apr May JunAverage 8.01 12.13 15.37 18.40 15.52 5.85

Page 10: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Tiber

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.9019

77

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

Tiber1 Jan Forecast

Actual inflow Observed

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

Tiber1 Feb Forecast

Actual inflow Observed

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

Tiber1 Mar Forecast

Actual inflow Observed

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

Tiber1 Apr Forecast

Actual inflow Observed

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

Tiber1 May Forecast

Actual inflow Observed

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

Tiber1 June Forecast

Actual inflow Observed

Jan Feb Mar Apr May June JulyR2 0.28 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.59 0.66 0.80

Standard Error 0.16 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.08

Page 11: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Yellowtail

Average monthly total precipitation (in)

Area = 19,693 mi2

Average Apr-Jul total volume inflow = 1.0 M ac-ft (1.4 M ac-ft Natural)

Average Oct-Nov total volume inflow = 0.30 M ac-ft (0.32 M ac-ft Natural)

Precip (in) Jan Feb Mar Apr May JunAverage 0.30 0.29 0.61 1.11 1.89 1.24

SWE (in) Jan Feb Mar Apr May JunAverage 6.49 8.84 10.88 13.60 13.84 6.80

Page 12: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Yellowtail

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

Yellowtail1 Jan Forecast

Actual inflow Observed Natural Inflow

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

Yellowtail1 Feb Forecast

Actual inflow Observed Natural Inflow

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

Yellowtail1 Mar Forecast

Actual inflow Observed Natural Inflow

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

Yellowtail1 Apr Forecast

Actual inflow Observed Natural Inflow

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

Yellowtail1 May Forecast

Actual inflow Observed Natural Inflow

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

Yellowtail1 June Forecast

Actual inflow Observed Natural Inflow

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul

With Holdouts R2 0.38 0.44 0.36 0.44 0.70 0.86 0.91Std dev Error 0.55 0.54 0.58 0.53 0.39 0.27 0.22

Page 13: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Boysen

Average monthly total precipitation (in)

Area = 7,750 mi2

Average Apr-Jul total volume inflow = 0.56 M ac-ft (0.6 M ac-ft Natural)

Average Oct-Nov total volume inflow = 0.11 M ac-ft (0.11 M ac-ft Natural)

Precip (in) Jan Feb Mar Apr May JunAverage 0.36 0.43 0.84 1.51 2.10 1.12

SWE (in) Jan Feb Mar Apr May JunAverage 5.65 7.61 9.48 11.87 11.42 4.79

Page 14: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Boysen

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

Boysen1 Jan Forecast

Actual inflow Observed Natural Inflow

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

Boysen1 Feb Forecast

Actual inflow Natural Inflow Observed

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

Boysen1 Mar Forecast

Actual inflow Natural Inflow Observed

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

Boysen1 Apr Forecast

Actual inflow Natural Inflow Observed

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

Boysen1 May Forecast

Actual inflow Natural Inflow Observed

-0.20

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

Boysen1 June Forecast

Actual inflow Natural Inflow Observed

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul

R2 0.45 0.44 0.43 0.48 0.78 0.91 0.91Standard error: 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.14 0.10 0.09

Page 15: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Glendo

Average monthly total precipitation (in)

Area = 15,562 mi2

Average Apr-Jul total volume inflow = 0.60 M ac-ft (0.88 M ac-ft Natural)0.14 M ac-ft below Alcova

Average Oct-Nov total volume inflow = 0.13 M ac-ft (0.09 M ac-ft Natural)0.03 M ac-ft below Alcova

Precip (in) Jan Feb Mar Apr May JunAverage 0.49 0.56 0.82 1.33 1.90 1.26

SWE (in) Jan Feb Mar Apr May JunAverage 8.66 12.26 15.74 19.44 19.07 8.92

Page 16: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Glendo

0.000.200.400.600.801.001.201.401.601.802.00

Glendo1 Jan Forecast

Actual inflow Observed Natural Inflow

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

1.80

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

Glendo1 Feb Forecast

Actual inflow Natural Inflow Observed

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

1.80

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

Glendo1 Mar Forecast

Actual inflow Natural Inflow Observed

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

1.80

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

Glendo1 Apr Forecast

Actual inflow Natural Inflow Observed

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

Glendo1 May Forecast

Actual inflow Natural Inflow Observed

-0.50

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

Glendo1 June Forecast

Actual inflow Natural Inflow Observed

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jun

R2 0.43 0.44 0.50 0.60 0.77 0.85 0.88Standard error: 0.43 0.42 0.40 0.35 0.27 0.22 0.20

Page 17: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Percent Error

0500

1000150020002500300035004000

Jan Feb Mar apr may jun

Inflo

w (K

AF)

Canyon Ferry

USACE Actual

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Jan Feb Mar apr may jun

Inflo

w (K

AF)

Clark Canyon

USACE Actual

Canyon FerryUSACE

Jan 39%Feb 43%Mar 44%apr 39%may 28%jun 24%

Clark CanyonJan 30%Feb 27%Mar 36%apr 20%may 18%jun 4%

TiberJan 55%Feb 53%Mar 46%apr 43%may 26%jun 27%

0

200

400

600

800

1000

Jan Feb Mar apr may jun

Inflo

w (K

AF)

Tiber

USACE Actual

Page 18: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Percent Error

*2011 Yellowtail forecast of Actual reservoir inflow for Apr – Jul (USACE and BoR)

USACE Forecast for May-Jul, includes holdouts from Boysen, Buffalo Bill and Bull Lake

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Jan Feb Mar apr may jun

Inflo

w (K

AF)

Yellowtail - AMJJ Actual Inflow

USACE Actual BoR

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Jan Feb Mar apr may jun

Inflo

w (K

AF)

Yellowtail

USACE Actual

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Jan Feb Mar apr may jun

Inflo

w (K

AF)

Boysen

USACE Actual

YellowtailUSACE

Jan 53%Feb 54%Mar 58%apr 53%may 30%jun 2%

BoysenJan 36%Feb 45%Mar 45%apr 45%may 38%jun 2%

Page 19: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Percent Error

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Jan Feb Mar apr may jun

Inflo

w (K

AF)

Glendo below Alcova

USACE Actual

0

500

1000

1500

2000

Jan Feb Mar apr may jun

Inflo

w (K

AF)

Glendo

USACE Actual

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Jan Feb Mar apr may jun

Inflo

w (K

AF)

Glendo with Holdouts

USACE Actual

GlendoJan 47%Feb 50%Mar 49%apr 42%may 29%jun 23%

Glendo below AlcovaJan 260%Feb 254%Mar 258%apr 242%may 277%jun 312%

Glendo Natural FlowJan 40%Feb 43%Mar 36%apr 23%may 4%jun 12%

Page 20: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

AutomationYellowtail Reservoir Forecasting Tool

To forcast for a given month enter data in the appropriately colored cells Jan Feb Mar Apr May JunCalculated values are shown in bold

Forecasted total volume inflow to reservoir May-Jul (10 6 ac-ft)

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Juneactual 1.086 1.036 0.978 1.056 0.948 1.169natural (with holdouts) 1.404 1.309 1.225 1.335 1.286 1.561

Total Antecedent Inflow from Oct-Nov

ac-ft 106 ac-ftactual 244780 0.245natural (with holdouts) 244780 0.245

Holdouts

30-Nov 1-Oct Oct-Novac-ft ac-ft ac-ft

Boysen 621834 639219 -17385Buffalo Bill 455551 483785 -28234Bull Lake Reservoirs 69623 65893 3730

Total Holdout -0.042 106 ac-ft

Precipitation stationsPrecipitation (in) http://cdo.ncdc.noaa.gov/dlyp/DLYPJan-Oct Nov Dec 2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June

Cody 481840 6.21 0.00 0.00 6.21 0.00 0.00 0.07 1.03 3.78Lander Hunt Fld AP 12.97 0.75 0.73 14.45 0.50 1.39 0.28 1.05 0.56Powell Fld Stn 4.34 0.52 0.18 5.04 0.00 0.96 0.12 0.67 3.41Riverton 10.11 0.14 0.60 10.85 0.24 0.75 0.08 0.21 5.29Worland 489785 0.84 0.52 0.25 1.61 0.14 0.12 0.42 0.57 1.31

Average 7.63 0.18 0.64 0.19 0.71 2.87Cumulative Average 0.18 0.82 1.01 1.72 4.59

Average of SWE at stations on first of month (in) Jan Feb Mar Apr May June

Average 7.7 10.2 12.2 15.7 20.2 20.5Col # 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0

Blad Mtn. 56 10.1 16.0 19.3 24.0 32.1 41.1Bear Trap Meadow 57 3.3 5.5 6.3 8.8 11.4 7.5Blackwater 58 14.1 17.9 20.8 26.9 36.7 43.1Bone Springs Div 59 7.9 12.9 15.7 20.3 28.2 33.2Burroughs Creek 60 7.9 10.1 12.1 15.8 20.7 20.3

4/1/2011

PeriodMost

Probable% of

Normal1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun

Boysen May-July 524 94% 122% 111% 109% 108% 41%Canyon Ferry (actual) Apr-July 2162 116% 115% 113% 110% 116% 69%

Canyon Ferry (natural) (1) Apr-July 2250 115% 115% 113% 110% 116% 69%Clark Canyon Apr-June 115 137% 134% 136% 128% 139% 89%Glendo (actual) Apr-July 966 168% 147% 137% 134% 139% 112%

Glendo (natural) (1) Apr-July 1512 179% 147% 137% 134% 139% 112%Alcova to Glendo Apr-July 161 120% 112% 117% 116% 106% 112%Tiber Apr-July 454 108% 98% 105% 118% 123% 86%Yellowtail (actual) May-July 1056 109% 120% 118% 114% 118% 64%Yellowtail (natural) (1) May-July 1335 99% 120% 118% 114% 118% 64%

Reservoir Inflow Forecast (KAF) Basin Snowpack (% Normal) Precipitation (% Normal)

Goals:• Link regression equations, data and

statistics to final forecast sheet• Links to data sources (semi-automated)• Limit data entry and calculation errors• Easily transfer regression coefficients

each year• Easily transfer annual data to regression

analysis workbook

Page 21: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

2011 Issues

Late snowfall in April► Switched from 1 Apr SWE to Max(1 Apr, 1 May)

Real-time precipitation data ► Difficult to automate

Canyon Ferry results► Not capturing complete water balance by the end of the season

Page 22: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Proposed Improvements to Inflow Forecasting

Daily estimates of forecasted inflow for monitoring► Need to automate regression analysis and data stream

Climate change impacts to regression analysis► Temperature appears to be increasing, Precipitation neither increasing

or decreasing► Changes in climate will reduce the accuracy of regressions over time► Limit data used in analysis to recent years rather than entire period of

record

Page 23: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

0.0E+00

5.0E+09

1.0E+10

1.5E+10

2.0E+10

2.5E+10

3.0E+10

7/10/1987 4/5/1990 12/30/1992 9/26/1995 6/22/1998 3/18/2001 12/13/2003 9/8/2006 6/4/2009

To

tal

bas

in S

WE

(m

3)

date

SWE IDW SWE IDW-elev SWE Average SSM/I NOHRSC

Proposed Improvements to Inflow Forecasting

Further investigation of better SWE estimation► Test in different basins► Field measurements to better understand distribution of snow

Canyon Ferry

Page 24: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Proposed Improvements to Inflow Forecasting

Passive Microwave Satellite Observations of SWE in the Great Plains

► Algorithms developed in Great Plains region of Canada.► Shown promising results in Red River of the North Basins► Independent estimate of SWE, available real-time► Long period of record (1987 – present)► Evaluate by comparison to NOHRSC, ground and flight observations,

hydrologic analysis

Page 25: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Proposed Improvements to Inflow Forecasting

Passive Microwave detection of snowmelt and runoff► Affected by presence of wet snow► Research into detection of “ripe” snow and rain-on-snow events► May provide information on timing of melt and flood forecasting

Hydrologic Analysis of Plains snowpack► Correlation between timing and volume to SWE in Plains to discharge► Terrain-state modeling ► Statistical analysis/rank-order

Page 26: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.

BUILDING STRONG®

Thank you


Recommended