U.S. COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
DECISIONS REVIEWING DETERMINATIONS
BY THE U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
ANTIDUMPING/COUNTERVAILING DUTY CASES
(January 1980-July 2008)
1 These materials were prepared by James M. Lyons, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission with the assistance of NatalieHulls, Jonas Robison, and Constance Rogers. The views reflected in these materials are the personal perspective of author and should not be considered toconstitute the official position of the ITC or of any or its Commissioners or staff.
JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ITC MATERIAL INJURY DETERMINATIONS1
The accompanying listing of U.S. Court of International Trade decisions reviewing material injury determinations by the U.S.International Trade Commission (“ITC”) in antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings (both original investigations and five-year sunset reviews) identifies the Judge making the decision as well as certain information about the ITC’s determination itself. Forexample, in the columns to the right of the case caption and citation, date of the decision and identity of the Judge, is informationspecifying whether the ITC determination was affirmative or negative with respect to the existence of material injury/threat ofmaterial injury, the number of Commissioners in the majority as well as the number of dissenters, if any. The last two columns in thecase listings then specify whether the ITC’s determination was affirmed by the reviewing Judge or remanded. The cases are set forthin a chronological listing and also grouped by the Judges deciding the appeals, listed in alphabetical order by Judge. The listingscontain all decisions of the Court rendered between 1980 and July 2008. Only those decisions of the Court reviewing a final agencyaction are contained in the listings. Omitted are Court opinions relating to all other matters, including issues such as access toconfidential information, procedural rulings, and statutory provisions other than those relating to final agency actions in antidumpingand countervailing duty determinations.
These case listings and the accompanying charts and graphs, which immediately follow afterwards, were prepared to begin anassessment of whether this data would reveal anything about the frequency of remands and whether the remands that occur are relatedin any meaningful way to either the nature of the Commission determination, i.e., whether a negative or affirmative determination orby the presence or absence of either unanimity, or near unanimity, among the Commissioners in the determinations subject to review. The data also has been examined to consider whether particular Judges are more likely to issue remand orders more frequently thanthe average rate for the Judges collectively.
During this twenty-nine year time period, the Court issued a total of 226 decisions as defined above. Eighty-five of thosedecisions or 38 percent resulted in remands to the ITC. Sometimes there were multiple remands in the course of an appeal from theagency determination(s) subject to the particular court proceeding.
The first graph reveals that when the twenty-nine year period is divided into three distinct ten year periods (nine years in thelast instance), there is noticeable variation in the remands rates. During the first ten years (1980-1989), the remand rate was the
highest with approximately 46 percent of the opinions issued by the Court including remands. The rate declined between 1990-1999to 26 percent and then rebounded to approximately 40 percent for the most recent nine year period.
The second graph depicts the percentage of total decisions remanded by each Judge who has rendered a decision in a caseinvolving the ITC between 1980-2008. As would be expected there is considerable variation among the Judges. The degree ofvariation would appear to be attributable to a number of factors. For one, the fewer the number of ITC determinations reviewed by aJudge means that the circumstances of individual cases will have a disproportionate effect on the percentage of remand/affirmancesoverall for that Judge. Thus, both the highest percentage of remands as well as the lowest percentage of remands are attributable tothose Judges who have decided the fewest cases involving the ITC. Those Judges who have issued fifteen or more opinions involvingthe ITC (only 7 of the 18 Judges issuing decisions reviewing ITC determinations during this period), have issued remands with afrequency that falls within the middle range for the Court as a whole—25 to 40 percent. When multiple remands are issued by asingle Judge in the course of a single appeal, the overall percentage of remand opinions issued by that Judge will be affected upwardsaccordingly. Conversely, if the number of remands for any one Judge were to be adjusted for multiple remands, the percentage ofoverall decisions remanded by that Judge would decline. In this connection, those Judges who have more frequently issued multipleremands tend to have a higher proportion of remands as a percentage of total decisions issued.
The penultimate graph examines whether there is any obvious correlation between whether the ITC decision subject to judicialreview is a negative or affirmative material injury determination and a Court ordered remand. The statistics for this period indicatethat there are a nearly identical percentage of remand decisions issued in both instances; again approximately 37-39 percent.
Finally, the last graph examines whether on a purely statistical basis a remand is more likely when the Commission’sdetermination is not unanimous and whether an evenly divided Commission vote is more likely to result in a remand. The datareveals that a remand is almost twice as likely when the Commission is evenly divided (a 3-3, or 2-2 vote) as when the Commissionissues a unanimous decision.
U.S. COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
CHRONOLOGICAL LISTING OF DECISIONS
REVIEWING USITC AD/CVD DETERMINATIONS
(January 1980-July 2008)
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
Budd Co. Ry. Div. v.US 507 F.Supp. 997 12/29/80 Boe
731-5 and6 (Prelim)
Rail Passenger Cars and parts thereof intendedfor use as original equipment in the UnitedStates from Italy and Japan Negative 5-0 Remanded
Atlantic Sugar Ltd. v.US 519 F.Supp. 916 7/8/81 Watson 731-3 Sugars and Sirups from Canada Affirmative 4-1 Remanded
Babcock & Wilcox Co.v. US 521 F.Supp. 479 8/20/81 Richardson
731-15(Prelim) Pipes and tubes or iron or steel from Japan Negative 4-1 Remanded
Atlantic Sugar Ltd. v.US 2 CIT 295 12/28/81 Watson 731-3 Sugars and Sirups from Canada Affirmative 2-1 Remanded
Atlantic Sugar Ltd. v.US 553 F.Supp. 1055 12/14/82 Watson 731-3 Sugars and Sirups from Canada Affirmative 4-1 Remanded
Freres v. US 6 CIT 42 7/18/83 Boe 731-44 Sorbitol from France Affirmative 4-2 Remanded
Armco Inc. v. US 570F.Supp. 51 8/22/83 Ford 731-26 Certain Steel Wire Nails from Korea Negative 3-2 Affirmed
Atlantic Sugar Ltd. v.US 573 F.Supp. 1142 10/14/83 Watson 731-3 Sugars and Sirups from Canada Affirmative 4-1 Vacated ITC
Freres v. US 583F.Supp. 599 3/19/84 Boe 731-44 Sorbitol from France Affirmative 4-0, 3-1 Affirmed
American Spring WireCorp (and Armco Inc.)v. US 590 F.Supp.1273 7/11/84 Maletz 731-26 Certain Steel Wire Nails from Korea Negative 3-2 Affirmed
Republic Steel Corp. v.US 591 F.Supp. 640 7/11/84 Watson
701-118,126,135, 156,161, 163,172(Prelim)
Carbon Steel Structural Shapes/Hot-rolledCarbon Steel Bar/Cold-formed Carbon SteelBar/ Hot-rolled Carbon Steel Plate/ Negative Various Remanded
Rhone Poulenc v. US592 F.Supp. 1318 7/19/84 Restani 731-25 Anhydrous Sodium Metasilicate from France Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed
British Steel Corp. v.US 593 F.Supp. 405 8/6/84 Newman 701-196 Stainless Steel Plate from the United Kingdom Affirmative 3-0 Dismissed
Jeannette Sheet GlassCorp v. US 607F.Supp. 123 3/22/85 Newman
731-127-129(Prelim)
Thin sheet glass from Switzerland, Belgium andthe Federal Republic of Germany Negative 3-1 Remanded
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
American Lamb Co. v.US 611 F.Supp. 979 5/31/85 DiCarlo
701-214(Prelim) Lamb meat from New Zealand Negative 4-2 Remanded
Luciano PisoniFabbrica AccessoriInstrumenti Musicali v.US 640 F. Supp. 255 6/12/85 DiCarlo 731-152 Pads for woodwind instrument keys from Italy Affirmative 3-2
Remandedto
Commerce
Maine Potato Councilv. US 613 F.Supp.1237 6/27/85 Restani 731-124 Certain Fresh Potatoes from Canada Negative 3-0 Remanded
Gifford-Hill Cement Co.v. US 615 F.Supp. 577 7/31/85 Restani
731-108-109 Portland Cement from Australia and Japan Negative 4-0 Affirmed
American GrapeGrowers v. US 615F.Supp. 603 8/8/85 Watson
701-210-211; 731-167-168(Prelim) Certain table wine from France and Italy Negative 3-0 Remanded
Armstrong Rubber Co.v. US 614 F.Supp.1252 8/8/85 Watson
731-200(Prelim)
Radial-ply tires for passenger cars from theRepublic of Korea Negative 5-0 Reversed Remanded
Bingham & Taylor v.US 627 F.Supp. 793 2/14/86 Carman
701-249(Prelim) Iron construction castings from Brazil Negative 3-2 Remanded
Kenda RubberIndustrial Co. Ltd v. US630 F. Supp. 354 2/24/86 Carman 731-166 Bicycle Tires and Tubes from Taiwan Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed
Kokusai Electric Co. v.US 632 F. Supp 23 3/14/86 Carman 731-163
Certain cell-site radio apparatus andsubassemblies thereof from Japan Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed
ICC Industries v. US632 F. Supp. 36 3/19/86 Watson 731-125
Potassium permanganate from the People'sRepublic of China Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed
Philipp Brothers, Inc. v.US 640 F.Supp. 1340 7/17/86 DiCarlo 731-161 Titanium Sponge from Japan Affirmative 4-1 Affirmed
Lone Star Steel v. US650 F.Supp. 183 11/28/86 Restani 731-191
Oil Country Tubular Goods from Argentina,Brazil, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, andSpain Negative 5-0 Affirmed
Jeannette Sheet GlassCorp v. US 654F.Supp. 179 1/9/87 Newman
731-127-129(Prelim)
Thin sheet glass from Switzerland, Belgium andthe Federal Republic of Germany Negative 5-0 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
Fundicao Tupy v. US652 F. Supp. 1538 1/13/87 Watson 731-278
Certain malleable cast-iron pipe fittings fromBrazil Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed
USX Corporation v.United States 655F.Supp. 487 2/9/87 Restani 731-175
Cold-rolled carbon steel sheet from Argentina,South Africa and Spain Negative 4-0, 3-1 Remanded
Hyundai Pipe Co. v.USTIC 670 F.Supp.357 2/23/87 DiCarlo
731-131-132, 138
Certain welded carbon steel pipes from theRepublic of Korea and Taiwan, Certainrectangular welded carbon steel pipes andtubes from the Republic of Korea Affirmative
4-0, 3-1,3-1, 4-0 Dismissed
Yuasa-General BatteryCorp. v. US 661F.Supp. 1214 5/22/87 Aquilino
731-238(Prelim) 12 volt motorcycle batteries from Japan Negative 5-0 Remanded
National PorkProducers Council v.US 661 F.Supp. 633 5/28/87 DiCarlo 701-224 Live swine and pork from Canada Negative 2-1 Affirmed
BMT Commodity Corp.v. US 667 F.Supp. 880 7/22/87 Restani 731-199 Certain dried salted codfish from Canada Affirmative 4-1 Affirmed
Alberta PorkProducers' Mktg. Bd. v.US 669 F.Supp. 445 8/7/87 DiCarlo 701-224 Live swine and pork from Canada Affirmative 2-1 Remanded
Hercules Inc. v. US673 F. Supp. 454 10/20/87 Carman
731-96;701-190 Nitrocellulose from France Affirmative 2-1 Affirmed
Empire Plow Co. v. US675 F. Sup. 1348 11/18/87 Carman 701-223 Agricultural tillage tools from Brazil Negative 3-2 Affirmed
Wells Mfg. Co. v. US677 F.Supp. 1239 12/8/87 Carman
701-208(Prelim) Iron bars from Brazil Negative 4-0 Affirmed
Copperweld Corp. v.US 682 F.Supp. 552 2/24/88 Carman 731-254
Heavy-walled rectangular welded carbon steelpipes and tubes from Canada Negative 4-0 Affirmed
USX Corporation v.United States 682F.Supp. 60 3/15/88 Restani 731-175
Cold-rolled carbon steel plates and sheets fromArgentina Negative 4-1 Remanded
Keyes Fibre Co. v. US682 F.Supp. 583 3/16/88 Aquilino 731-201 Egg filler flats from Canada Negative 5-0 Remanded
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
Armstrong Rubber Co.v. US 685 F.Supp. 252 3/17/88 Watson
731-200(Prelim)
Radial-ply tires for passenger cars from theRepublic of Korea Negative 5-0 Remanded
Alberta PorkProducers' Mktg. Bd. v.US 683 F.Supp. 1398 3/22/88 DiCarlo 701-224 Live swine and pork from Canada Affirmative 2-1 Affirmed
Maverick Tube Corp. v.US 687 F. Supp. 1569 5/24/88 DiCarlo
731-375(Prelim) Certain line pipes and tubes from Canada Negative 4-1 Remanded
Algoma Steel Corp Ltdv. US 688 F.Supp. 639 6/8/88 Restani
731-276-277
Oil Country Tubular goods from Canada andTaiwan Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed
Yuasa-General BatteryCorp. v. US 688F.Supp. 1551 7/12/88 Aquilino
731-238(Prelim) 12 volt motorcycle batteries from Japan Negative 6-0 Reversed
AssociacionColombiana deExportadores de Floresv. US 693 F.Supp.1165 7/14/88 Restani
701-275-278; 731-327-333
Certain fresh cut flowers from Canada, Chile,Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Kenya, andMexico Affirmative 3-2 Remanded
Keyes Fibre Co. v. US691 F.Supp. 376 7/22/88 Aquilino 731-201 Egg filler flats from Canada Negative 4-2 Remanded
Asahi Chemical Indus.Co. v. US 692 F.Supp.1376 7/25/88 Rao 731-1, 2 Spun acrylic yarn from Japan and Italy Affirmative 5-0 Remanded
National Ass'n of MirrorMfrs. v. US 696F.Supp. 642 8/25/88 DiCarlo
731-320-325
Certain unfinished mirrors from Belgium,Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Japan,Portugal, and the United Kingdom Negative 5-0, 4-1 Affirmed
USX Corporation v.United States 698F.Supp. 234 9/16/88 Restani 731-175
Cold-rolled carbon steel plates and sheets fromArgentina Negative 4-1 Affirmed
Chaparral Steel Co. v.US 698 F.Supp. 254 9/28/88 Carman 731-234
Carbon steel angles, shapes, and sections fromNorway Negative 4-1 Remanded
Mitsubishi ElectricCopr v. US 700 F.Supp 538 10/31/88 Carman 731-207
Cellular Mobile Telephones and assembliesthereof from Japan Affirmative 4-1 Remanded
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
Negev Phosphates v.US DOC and USITC699 F.Supp. 938 11/9/88 DiCarlo
701-286;731-365-366 Industrial phophoric acid from Belgium Affirmative 3-2 Affirmed
AssociacionColombiana deExportadores de Floresv. US 704 F.Supp.1068 12/27/88 Restani
701-275-278; 731-327-333
Certain fresh cut flowers from Canada, Chile,Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Kenya, andMexico Negative 5-0 Affirmed
Citrosuco Paulista v.US 704 F.Supp. 1075 12/30/88 DiCarlo 731-326 Frozen concentrated orange juice from Brazil Affirmative 5-1 Remanded
Florex v. US 705 F.Supp. 582 1/6/89 Restani 731-333 Certain fresh cut flowers from Mexico Affirmative 3-2 Affirmed
Citrosuco Paulista v.US 706 F.Supp. 1333 3/13/89 DiCarlo 731-326 Frozen concentrated orange juice from Brazil Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed
Hannibal Industries v.US 710 F.Supp. 332 3/17/89 DiCarlo 731-349
Certain welded carbon steel pipes and tubesfrom Taiwan Negative 3-2 Remanded
Borlem S.A.EmpreedimentosIndustriais v. US 710F.Supp. 797 3/22/89 Carman 731-335 Tubeless steel disk wheels from Brazil Affirmative 4-1 Remanded
LMI-La MetalliIndustriale v. US 712F. Supp 959 4/11/89 DiCarlo
701-270;731-313-314, 316-317
Certain brass sheet and strip from France, Italy,Sweden, and West Germany Affirmative 3-2 Affirmed
Sony Corporation ofAmerica v. US 712F.Supp. 978 4/26/89 Musgrave
731-367-370
Color Picture Tubes from Canada, Japan, theRepublic of Korea, and Singapore Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed
Granges MetallverkenAB v. US 716 F. Supp.17 6/7/89 DiCarlo
701-270;731-313-314, 316-317
Certain brass sheet and strip from France, Italy,Sweden, and West Germany Affirmative 3-2 Dismissed
Wieland Werke AG v.US 718 F.Supp. 50 7/10/89 DiCarlo
701-270;731-313-314, 316-317
Certain brass sheet and strip from France, Italy,Sweden, and West Germany Affirmative 3-2 Affirmed
Marsuda-RodgersInternational v. US 719F. Supp. 1092 7/26/89 Tsoucalas
731-341,344, 345
Tapered Roller Bearings from Hungary andRomania Affirmative 3-2 Reversed Remanded
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
Roses, Inc. v. US 720F.Supp. 180 8/18/89 Aquilino 731-148 Fresh cut roses from Colombia Negative 3-1 Affirmed
Sandvik AB v. US 721F.Supp. 1322 9/14/89 Carman 731-354 Stainless steel pipes and tubes from Sweden Affirmative 4-1 Affirmed
Asahi Chemical Indus.Co. v. US 727 F.Supp.625 12/9/89 Tsoucalas 731-1, 2 Spun acrylic yarn from Japan and Italy Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed
MetallverkenNederland BV v. US728 F. Supp. 730 12/18/89 DiCarlo
731-379-380
Certain brass sheet and strip from Japan andthe Netherlands Affirmative 3-3 Remanded
Cambridge LeeIndustries v. US 728F.Supp. 748 12/21/89 DiCarlo
731-379-380
Certain brass sheet and strip from Japan andthe Netherlands Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed
Remandedin part
MBL (USA) andMitsubishi Belting Ltd.V. US 733 F.Supp. 379 3/14/90 Aquilino
701-293-295, 731-412-419
Industrial belts from Israel, Italy, Japan,Singapore, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, theUK, and West Germany Affirmative 3-3
Summaryjudgmentpartially
dismissed,partiallygranted
Marsuda-RodgersInternational v. US 734F.Supp. 1019 4/3/90 Tsoucalas
731-341,344, 345
Tapered Roller Bearings from Hungary andRomania Negative 6-0 Affirmed
Trent Tube Division v.US 741 F.Supp. 921 6/20/90 Carman 731-354 Stainless steel pipes and tubes from Sweden Negative 3-2
Remandedin part
MetallverkenNederland BV v. US728 F. Supp. 730 7/20/90 DiCarlo
731-379-380
Certain brass sheet and strip from Japan andthe Netherlands Affirmative 4-2 Dismissed
Suramericana deAleaciones Laminidas,C.A. v. US 746 F.Supp.139 8/22/90 Musgrave
701-287;731-378
Certain Electrical Conductor Aluminum RedrawRod from Venezuela Affirmative 4-0 Vacated
Remanded[by CAFC]
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
Torrington Co. v. US747 F.Supp. 744 9/11/90 Tsoucalas
731-391-399
Anti-friction bearings (other than tapered rollerbearings) and parts thereof from WestGermany, France, Italy, Japan, Romania,Singapore, Sweden, Thailand, and the UnitedKingdom Affirmative Various Affirmed
Trent Tube Division v.US 752 F.Supp. 468 11/27/90 Carman 731-354 Stainless steel pipes and tubes from Sweden Affirmative 3-2 Affirmed
American GrapeGrowers v. US 771F.Supp. 363 7/12/91 Watson
701-210-211; 731-167-168(Prelim) Certain table wine from France and Italy Negative 3-2 Remanded
United Engineeringand Forging v. US 779F.Supp. 1375 11/18/91 Aquilino
701-282;731-351,353
Certain Forged steel crankshafts from theFederal Republic of Germany and the UnitedKingdom Affirmative 4-1 Affirmed
Borlem S.A.EmpreedimentosIndustriais v. US 786F.Supp. 1031 3/3/92 Carman 731-335 Tubeless steel disk wheels from Brazil Negative 4-1 Affirmed
Bando ChemicalIndustries, Ltd. v. US787 F.Supp. 224 3/5/92 Aquilino
701-293;731-412-419
Industrial belts from Israel, Italy, Japan,Singapore, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, theUK, and West Germany Affirmative 3-3 Remanded
Brother Industries Ltdv. US 787 F.Supp.1454 3/12/92 Restani 731-483 Certain personal word processors from Japan Affirmative 4-0 Dismissed
Torrington Co. v. US790 F.Supp. 1161 4/3/92 DiCarlo
701-307;731-498-511(Prelim)
Ball Bearings, Mounted or Unmounted andParts Thereof, from Argentina, Austria, Brazil,Canada, Hong Kong, Hungary, Mexico, thePeople's Republic of China, Poland, theRepublic of Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey, andYugoslavia Negative 3-1 Affirmed
Cemex v. US 790F.Supp. 290 4/7/92 Carman 731-451
Gray portland cement and cement clinker fromMexico Affirmative 2-1 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
Calabrian Corp v.USITC 794 F. Supp.377 5/13/92 Carman
701-303;731-465-468(Prelim)
Certain sodium sulfur chemical compoundsfrom West Germany, China, Turkey, and theUnited Kingdom Negative Various Dismissed
Minebea Co. Ltd andNMB Corp. v. US 794F. Supp. 1161 7/6/92 Tsoucalas
731-391-399
Anti-friction bearings (other than tapered rollerbearings) and parts thereof from WestGermany, France, Italy, Japan, Romania,Singapore, Sweden, Thailand, and the UnitedKingdom Affirmative Various Affirmed
Chung Ling Co. v. US805 F.Supp. 45 7/28/92 Carman
731-448-450
Sweaters wholly or in chief weight of man-madefiber from Hong Kong, the Republic of Korea,and Taiwan Affirmative 2-1 Remanded
Encon Industries v. US16 CIT 840 9/24/92 Restani 731-473
Certain Electric Fans From the People'sRepublic of China and Taiwan Affirmative 3-1 Affirmed
Chr. Bjelland SeafoodsA/S v. US 16 CIT 945 10/23/92 Goldberg
701-302;731-454 Fresh and chilled Atlantic salmon from Norway Affirmative 3-1 Reversed Remanded
Tianjin MachineryImport and ExportCorp. v. US 16 CIT1020 12/1/92 Goldberg 731-457
Heavy Forged Hand Tools from the People'sRepublic of China Affirmative 4-0 Remanded
Hosiden Corp v. US810 F. Supp. 322 12/29/92 Goldberg 731-469
High-Information Content Flat Panel Displaysand Subassemblies Thereof from Japan Affirmative 3-1 Reversed Remanded
Holmes Products Corpv. US 16 CIT 1101 12/30/92 Restani 731-473
Certain Electric Fans From the People'sRepublic of China and Taiwan Affirmative 3-1 Remanded
Camargo CorreaMetais v. US 17 CIT 35 1/22/93 Musgrave 731-471 Silicon Metal From Brazil Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed
Suramericana deAleaciones Laminidas,C.A. v. US 818 F.Supp.348 3/15/93 Musgrave
701-287;731-378
Certain Electrical Conductor Aluminum RedrawRod from Venezuela Affirmative 4-0 Remanded
Committee of DomesticSteel Wire Rope &Specialty Cable Mfrs.v. US 808 F.Supp. 376 3/30/93 Tsoucalas
701-305;731-478,480-482
Steel Wire Rope from Chile, India, the People'sRepublic of China, Taiwan, and Thailand Negative 4-0 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
Mitsubishi MaterialsCorp. v. US 820 F.Supp. 608 4/27/93 Goldberg 731-461
Gray portland cement and cement clinker fromJapan Affirmative 3-1
Affirmed inpart
Remandedin part
Tianjin MachineryImport and ExportCorp. v. US 820F.Supp. 1456 4/27/93 Goldberg 731-457
Heavy Forged Hand Tools from the People'sRepublic of China Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed
Texas Crushed StoneCo. v. US 822 F.Supp.773 5/25/93 Carman
731-562(Prelim) Crushed Limestone from Mexico Negative 5-0 Affirmed
Feldspar Corp. v. US825 F.Supp. 1095 6/23/93 Carman 731-525 Nepheline Syenite from Canada Negative 6-0 Dismissed
General Motors Corp.v. USITC 827 F.Supp.774 7/12/93 Restani 731-522 Minivans from Japan Negative 4-2 Affirmed
Suramericana deAleaciones Laminidas,C.A. v. US 841 F.Supp.1220 8/4/93 Musgrave
701-287;731-378
Certain Electrical Conductor Aluminum RedrawRod from Venezuela Negative 4-2 Affirmed
Bando ChemicalIndustries, Ltd. v. US17 CIT 798 8/6/93 Aquilino
701-293;731-412-419
Industrial belts from Israel, Italy, Japan,Singapore, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, theUK, and West Germany Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed
Chung Ling Co. v. US829 F.Supp. 1353 8/11/93 Carman
731-448-450
Sweaters wholly or in chief weight of man-madefiber from Hong Kong, the Republic of Korea,and Taiwan Negative 6-0 Affirmed
R-M Industries v. US848 F.Supp. 204 3/18/94 Restani
701-318;731-560-561
Sulfanilic Acid from the Republic of Hungaryand India Negative 4-2 Remanded
Hosiden Corp v. US852 F. Supp. 1050 4/14/94 Goldberg 731-469
High-Information Content Flat Panel Displaysand Subassemblies Thereof from Japan
Affirmative/Negative 3-3, 4-2 Affirmed
Connecticut SteelCorp. v. US 852F.Supp. 1061 4/22/94 DiCarlo
731-649(Prelim) Steel Wire Rod from Trinidad and Tobago Negative 5-1 Affirmed
Grupo IndustrialCamesa v. U.S. 853 F.Supp. 440 5/18/94 DiCarlo
731-546-547
Steel Wire Rope from the Republic of Koreaand Mexico Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
R-M Industries v. US18 CIT 577 6/14/94 Restani
701-318;731-560-561
Sulfanilic Acid from the Republic of Hungaryand India
Affirmative/Negative 4-2; 4-2 Affirmed
Saarstahl AG v. US858 F.Supp 196 6/24/94 Carman
701-314-317; 731-552-555
Certain Hot-Rolled Lead and Bismuth CarbonSteel Products from Brazil, France, Germany,and the United Kingdom Negative 5-1 Affirmed
United States SteelGroup v. US 873F.Supp. 673 12/30/94 Restani
701-319-332, 334,336-342,344, 347-353; 731-573-579,581-592,594-597,599-609,612-619
Certain Flat-Rolled Steel Products fromAustralia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada,Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea,Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland,Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UnitedKingdom Negative 5-1; 4-2 Affirmed
Chr. Bjelland SeafoodsA/S v. US 19 CIT 35 1/18/95 Goldberg
701-302;731-454 Fresh Chilled Atlantic Salmon from Norway Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed
Kern-Liebers USAv.US 19 cIT 87 1/27/95 Restani
701-319-332, 334,336-342,344, 347-353; 731-573-579,581-592,594-597,599-609,612-619
Certain Flat-Rolled Steel Products fromAustralia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada,Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea,Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland,Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UnitedKingdom
Affirmative/Negative Various Affirmed
Nippon Steel Corp. v.US 19 CIT 450 4/3/95 Restani
701-319-332, 334,336-342,344, 347-353; 731-573-579,581-592,594-597,599-609,612-619
Certain Flat-Rolled Steel Products fromAustralia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada,Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea,Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland,Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UnitedKingdom Affirmative Various
Affirmed inpart
Remandedin part
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
Stalexport v. US 890F.Supp. 1053 5/23/95 Tsoucalas
701-319-332, 334,336-342,344, 347-353; 731-573-579,581-592,594-597,599-609,612-619
Certain Flat-Rolled Carbon Steel Products fromArgentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil,Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Italy,Japan, Korea, Mexico, the Netherlands, NewZealand, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden,and the United Kingdom Negative Various Affirmed
Nippon Steel Corp. v.US 19 CIT 827 6/9/95 Restani
701-319-332, 334,336-342,344, 347-353; 731-573-579,581-592,594-597,599-609,612-619
Certain Flat-Rolled Steel Products fromAustralia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada,Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea,Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland,Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UnitedKingdom Affirmative Various Affirmed
Acciai Speciali Terni v.US 19 CIT 1051 8/7/95 Restani
701-355;731-659-660
Grain Oriented Silicon Electrical Steel from Italyand Japan Affirmative 3-1, 5-0 Affirmed
Timken Co. v. US 913F.Supp. 580 1/3/96 Tsoucalas 731-572
Certain Special Quality Carbon and Alloy Hot-Rolled Steel Bars and Rods and SemifinishedProducts Thereof from Brazil Negative 6-0 Affirmed
Mitsubishi MaterialsCorp. v. US 918 F.Supp. 422 2/29/96 Goldberg 731-461
Gray portland cement and cement clinker fromJapan Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed
Aristech ChemicalCorp. v. US Slip Op.96-51 3/11/96 Musgrave
701-358;731-667(Prelim) Phthalic Anhydride from Mexico Negative 5-1 Affirmed
Companhia Paulista v.US 20 CIT 473 4/15/96 Restani
731-671-674
Silicomanganese from Brazil, the People'sRepublic of China, Ukraine, and Venezuela Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed
Floral Trade Council v.US 20 CIT 595 5/17/96 Restani
731-684-685 Fresh Cut Roses from Colombia and Ecuador Negative 4-2 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
Hyundai ElectronicsIndustries Co. v.USITC 20 CIT 805 7/5/96 Goldberg 731-556
Drams of one Megabit and Above from theRepublic of Korea Affirmative 3-3 Remanded
Mukand v. US 937 f.Supp 910 8/2/96 Goldberg 731-638 Stainless Steel Wire Rod from India Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed
Gerald Metals Inc v.US 937 F. Supp. 930 8/21/96 Pogue
731-696-698 Magnesium from China, Russia, and Ukraine Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed
Guangxi Gitric Import &Export Corp v. U.S.955 F.Supp. 1477 1/8/97 Pogue
731-726-727, 729
Polyvinyl Alcohol from China, Japan, andTaiwan Affirmative 3-3 Dismissed
BIC Corp. v. US 964F.Supp. 391 4/24/97 Goldberg
731-700-701 Disposable Lighters from China and Thailand Negative 4-2 Affirmed
Dastech InternationalInc. v. USITC 963F.Supp. 1220 5/1/97 Wallach 731-653
Sebacic Acid from the People's Republic ofChina Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed
Hyundai ElectronicsIndustries Co. v.USITC CIT Slip Op.97-53 5/2/97 Goldberg 731-556
Drams of one Megabit and Above from theRepublic of Korea Affirmative 3-1 Affirmed
Makita Corp. v. US 974F.Supp. 770 7/8/97 Aquilino 731-571
Professional Electric Cutting andSanding/Grinding Tools from Japan Affirmative Various
Actiondismissed
Gerald Metals Inc v.US 8 F. Supp.2d 861 4/28/98 Pogue
731-696-698 Magnesium from China, Russia, and Ukraine Affirmative 3-3
Vacatedprevious Remanded
Coalition for thePreservation ofAmerican Brake Drum& Rotor AftermarketMfrs v. US 15F.Supp.2d 918 7/13/98 Wallach 731-744 Certain Brake Drums and Rotors from China Negative 4-0 Affirmed
Goss Graphics SystemInc. v. US 33F.Supp.2d 1082 10/16/98 Pogue
731-736-737
Large Newspaper Printing Presses andComponents Thereof, Whether Assembled orUnassembled, from Germany and Japan Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed
Gerald Metals Inc v.US 27 F.Supp.2d 1351 10/20/98 Pogue
731-696-698 Magnesium from China, Russia, and Ukraine Negative 2-1 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
NEC Corp. v. US DOCand USITC 36F.Supp.2d 380 12/15/98 Pogue 731-750 Vector Supercomputers from Japan Affirmative 3-0 Remanded
Taiwan SemiconductorIndustry Association v.US 59 F.Supp.2d 1324 6/30/99 Pogue
731-761-762
Static Random Access MemorySemiconductors from the Republic of Korea andTaiwan Affirmative 1-1 Remanded
Asociacion deProductores deSalmon y Trucha deChile v. USITC SlipOp. 99-58 7/2/99 Goldberg 731-768 Fresh Atlantic Salmon from Chile Affirmative 2-1 Remanded
Ranchers-CattlemenAction LegalFoundation v. US 74F.Supp.2d 1353 11/5/99 Carman
701-386;731-812-813(Prelim) Live Cattle from Canada and Mexico Negative 5-1 Affirmed
NEC Corp. v. US DOCand USITC 83F.Supp.2d 1339 12/17/99 Pogue 731-750 Vector Supercomputers from Japan Affirmative 3-1 Affirmed
Taiwan SemiconductorIndustry Association v.US 93 F.Supp.2d1283/105 F.Supp.2d1363 4/11/00 Pogue
731-761-762
Static Random Access MemorySemiconductors from the Republic of Korea andTaiwan Negative 4-1 Remanded
Asociacion deProductores deSalmon y Trucha deChile v. USITC 24 CIT654 7/27/00 Goldberg 731-768 Fresh Atlantic Salmon from Chile Affirmative 5-1 Remanded
Allegheny LudlumCorp. v. US 116F.Supp.2d 1276 8/28/00 Wallach
701-376-377, 379;731-788-793
Certain Stainless Steel Plate from Belgium,Canada, Italy, Korea, South Africa, and Taiwan Negative 4-2 Affirmed
Taiwan SemiconductorIndustry Association v.US 118 F.Supp.2d1250 8/29/00 Pogue
731-761-762
Static Random Access MemorySemiconductors from the Republic of Korea andTaiwan Negative 4-1 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
Asociacion deProductores deSalmon y Trucha deChile v. USITC 24 CIT969 9/8/00 Goldberg 731-768 Fresh Atlantic Salmon from Chile Affirmative 5-1 Remanded
Acciai Speciali Terni v.US 118 F. Supp. 2d1298 10/2/00 Wallach
701-376-379; 731-788-793 Stainless Steel Plate from the United Kingdom Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed
USEC Inc. v. US 132F.Supp.2d 1 1/24/01 Barzilay 731-539 Uranium from Kazakhstan Negative 3-0 Affirmed
Steel Authority of Indiav. US 146 F.Supp.2d900 5/22/01 Pogue
701-387-391; 731-816-821
Certain Cut to Length Steel Plate from France,India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, and Korea Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed
Titanium Metals Corp.v. US 155 F.Supp.2d750 6/22/01 Barzilay
731-161(Review) Titanium Sponge from Japan Negative 3-0 Affirmed
Ad Hoc Committee ofDomestic UraniumProduers v. US 162F.Supp.2d 649 8/14/01 Restani
731-539-C, E, andF(Review) Uranium from Russia, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan Negative 5-0 Affirmed
Far Eastern Textile Ltdv. USITC slip Op. 01-102 8/14/01 Restani
731-825-826
Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from Korea andTaiwan Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed
ALTX Inc. v. US 167F.Supp.2d 1353 9/19/01 Restani 731-859
Circular Seamless Stainless Steel HollowProducts from Japan Negative 4-2 Remanded
Chefline Corp. v. US170 F.Supp.2d 1320 9/26/01 Pogue
701-267-268; 731-297-299,304-305(Review)
Certain Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware fromChina, Taiwan, and Mexico and Top-of-the-Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware from Koreaand Taiwan Affirmative 3-3 Remanded
Nippon Steel Corp. v.US 182 F.Supp.2d1330 12/31/01 Restani 731-860
Tin and Chromium Coated Steel Sheet fromJapan Affirmative 4-2 Remanded
Asociacion deProductores deSalmon y Trucha deChile v. USITC 180F.Supp.2d 1360 1/9/02 Goldberg 731-768 Fresh Atlantic Salmon from Chile Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
Elkem Metals Co. v.US 193 F.Supp.2d1314 2/21/02 Eaton
731-566-570, 641
Ferrosilicon from Brazil, China, Kazakhstan,Russia, Ukraine, and Venezuela Negative 6-0 Remanded
Committee of DomesticSteel Wire Rope &Specialty Cable Mfrs.v. US 201 F.Supp.2d1287 4/5/02 Barzilay
731-868-869
Steel Wire Rope from India and the People'sRepublic of China Negative 6-0 Affirmed
Usinor Industeel v. USSlip Op. 02-39 4/29/02 Restani
701-319;731-573(Review) Certain Cut to Length Steel Plate from Belgium Affirmative 6-0 Remanded
Co-Steel Raritan, Inc.v. US 244 F.Supp.2d1349 6/20/02 Aquilino
701-417-431; 731-953-965(Prelim)
Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil,Canada, Egypt, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico,Moldova, South Africa, Trinidad and Tobago,Ukraine, and Venezuela Negative 4-1 Remanded
ALTX Inc. v. US 26 CIT709 7/12/02 Restani 731-859
Circular Seamless Stainless Steel HollowProducts from Japan Affirmative 3-3 Remanded
Usinor, Beautour v. US26 CIT 767 7/19/02 Wallach
701-319-332; 731-573-579 Flat-rolled Carbon Steel Products Affirmative 4-2 Remanded
Ugine-Savoie Imphy v.US Slip Op. 02-79 7/31/02 Goldberg
701-178;731-636-638(Review)
Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, France,India, and Spain Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed
Chefline Corp. v. US219 F.Supp.2d 1303 8/5/02 Pogue
701-267-268; 731-297-299,304-305(Review)
Certain Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware fromChina, Taiwan, and Mexico and Top-of-the-Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware from Koreaand Taiwan Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed
Nippon Steel Corp. v.US 223 F.Supp.2d1349 8/9/02 Restani 731-860
Tin and Chromium Coated Steel Sheet fromJapan Affirmative 4-2 Vacated
Indorama Chemicals(Thailand) Ltd. V.USITC Slip Op. 02-1-4 9/4/02 Carman
731-703,705(Review)
Furfuryl Alcohol from the People's Republic ofChina and Thailand Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
Co-Steel Raritan, Inc.v. US Slip Op. 02-113 9/13/02 Aquilino
701-417-431; 731-953-965(Prelim)
Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil,Canada, Egypt, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico,Moldova, South Africa, Trinidad and Tobago,Ukraine, and Venezuela Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed
Usinor Industeel v. US26 CIT 1402 12/20/02 Restani
701-319;731-573(Review) Certain Cut to Length Steel Plate from Belgium Affirmative 4-0 Remanded
Nippon Steel Corp. v.US Slip Op. 02-153 12/24/02 Eaton
701-355;731-659-660(Review)
Grain Oriented Silicon Electrical Steel from Italyand Japan Affirmative 3-3 Remanded
ALTX Inc. v. US SlipOp. 02-154 12/31/02 Restani 731-859
Circular Seamless Stainless Steel HollowProducts from Japan Negative 3-2 Affirmed
Corus Staal v. USITCSlip Op. 03-32 3/21/03 Restani
701-405-408; 731-899-904,906-908
Hot Rolled Steel Products from China, India,Indonesia, Kazakhstan, the Netherlands,Romania, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, andUkraine Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed
Timken U.S. Corp. v.US 264 F.Supp.2d1264 4/24/03 Tsoucalas
AA-1921-143; 731-343(Review)
Certain Bearings from China, France, Germany,Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore,Sweden, and the United Kingdom Negative 4-1 Remanded
Committee for FairCoke Trade v. US 27CIT 774 5/20/03 Eaton
731-951-952(Prelim) Blast Furnace Coke from China and Japan Negative 3-2 Remanded
Elkem Metals Co. v.US 276 F.Supp.2d1296 6/18/03 Eaton
731-566-570, 641
Ferrosilicon from Brazil, China, Kazakhstan,Russia, Ukraine, and Venezuela Negative 5-0 Remanded
Committee for FairBeam Imports v. USSlip Op. 03-73 6/27/03 Barzilay
731-935-936, 938-942
Structural Steel Beams from China, Germany,Italy, Luxembourg, Russia, South Africa, Spainand Taiwan Negative 4-1 Affirmed
Committee for FairlyTraded VenezuelanCement v. US 279F.Supp.2d 1314 7/28/03 Ridgway
731-451,461, 519(Review)
Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinkerfrom Japan, Mexico, and Venezuela Negative 5-0 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
NMB Singapore Ltd. v.US 288 F.Supp.2d1308 9/3/03 Tsoucalas
AA1921-143; 731-341, 343-345, 391,399(Review)
Certain Bearings from China, France, Germany,Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore,Sweden, and the United Kingdom Affirmative 4-1 Remanded
Usinor Industeel v. USSlip Op. 03-118 9/8/03 Restani
701-319;731-573(Review) Certain Cut to Length Steel Plate from Belgium Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed
United States SteelCorp. v. US 294F.Supp.2d 1359 10/28/03 Goldberg
701-393-396; 731-829-840
Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Products fromArgentina, Brazil, Japan, Russia, South Africa,and Thailand Negative 5-1 Remanded
Nippon Steel Corp. v.US 301 F.Supp.2d1367 12/17/03 Eaton
701-355;731-659-660(Review)
Grain Oriented Silicon Electrical Steel from Italyand Japan Affirmative 2-2 Remanded
Olin Corp.-BrassGroup v. US Slip Op.04-04 1/9/04 Aquilino
701-269-270; 731-311-317,379-380(Review)
Brass Sheet and Strip from Brazil, Canada,France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, theNetherlands, and Sweden Negative 4-2 Affirmed
Timken U.S. Corp. v.US 310 F.Supp.2d1327 1/27/04 Tsoucalas
731-391,394, 397,399
Certain Bearings from China, France, Germany,Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore,Sweden, and the United Kingdom Negative 3-2 Remanded
Nucor Corp. v. US 318F.Supp. 2d 1207 2/19/04 Carman
731-965,971-972,979, 981
Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Products fromAustralia, India, Japan, Sweden, and Thailand Negative 4-1 Affirmed
Timken U.S. Corp. v.US 321 F.Supp.2d1361 2/25/04 Tsoucalas
AA-1921-143; 731-343(Review)
Certain Bearings from China, France, Germany,Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore,Sweden, and the United Kingdom Negative 2-1 Affirmed
Elkem Metals Co. v.US 342 F.Supp.2d1207 5/12/04 Eaton
731-566-570, 641
Ferrosilicon from Brazil, China, Kazakhstan,Russia, Ukraine, and Venezuela Negative 4-0 Remanded
Usinor, Beautour v. US342 F. Supp. 2d 1267 6/9/04 Wallach
701-319-332; 731-573-579 Flat-rolled Carbon Steel Products Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
Committee for FairCoke Trade v. US SlipOp. 04-68 6/10/04 Eaton
731-951-952(Prelim) Blast Furnace Coke from China and Japan Negative 2-1 Affirmed
Bratsk AluminumSmelter v. US 28 CIT955 6/22/04 Tsoucalas 731-991 Silicon Metal from Russia Affirmative 3-0 Remanded
NMB Singapore Ltd. v.US 341 F.Supp.2d1327 8/5/04 Tsoucalas
AA1921-143; 731-341, 343-345. 391,399(Review)
Certain Bearings from China, France, Germany,Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore,Sweden, and the United Kingdom Affirmative 3-0 Affirmed
Timken U.S. Corp. v.US Slip Op. 04-98 8/9/04 Tsoucalas
731-391,394, 397,399
Certain Bearings from China, France, Germany,Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore,Sweden, and the United Kingdom Affirmative 3-0 Affirmed
Sensient TechnologiesCorp v. US Slip Op.04-115 9/10/04 Musgrave
701-433;731-1029(Prelim) Allura Red Coloring from India Negative 4-0 Affirmed
American BearingManufacturersAssociation v. US 350F.Supp.2d 1100 9/16/04 Eaton 731-989 Ball Bearings from China Negative 4-0 Affirmed
Nippon Steel Corp. v.US 350 F.Supp.2d1186 10/14/04 Restani 731-860
Tin and Chromium Coated Steel Sheet fromJapan Affirmative 4-2 Remanded
Siderca, S.A.I.C. v. US350 F.Supp.2d 1223 10/27/04 Pogue
701-362;731-707-710(Review)
Certain Seamless Carbon and Alloy SteelStandard, Line and Pressure Pipe fromArgentina, Brazil, Germany, and Italy Affirmative 6-0 Remanded
Allied Mineral ProductsInc. v. US Slip Op. 04-139 11/12/04 Restani 731-1022 Refined Brown Aluminum Oxide from China Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed
United States SteelCorp. v. US 350F.Supp.2d 1276 11/18/04 Goldberg
701-393-396; 731-829-840
Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Products fromArgentina, Brazil, Japan, Russia, South Africa,and Thailand Negative 5-1 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
Nitrogen Solutions FairTrade Committee v.US 358 F.Supp.2d1314 1/31/05 Goldberg
731-1006,1008-1009
Urea Ammonium Nitrate Solutions fromBelarus, Russia, and Ukraine Negative 4-0 Affirmed
Caribbean Ispat Ltd. v.US 366 F.Supp.2d1300 3/22/05 Aquilino
701-417-421; 731-953-963
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod fromBrazil, Canada, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico,Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed
Remanded[by CAFC]
Nippon Steel Corp. v.US Slip Op. 05-38 3/23/05 Restani 731-860
Tin and Chromium Coated Steel Sheet fromJapan Negative N/A Affirmed
Co-Steel Raritan, Inc.v. US Slip Op. 05-63 6/7/05 Aquilino
701-417-431; 731-953-965(Prelim)
Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil,Canada, Egypt, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico,Moldova, South Africa, Trinidad and Tobago,Ukraine, and Venezuela Negative 2-1 Remanded
Siderca, S.A.I.C. v. US374 F.Supp.2d 1285 6/9/05 Pogue
701-362;731-707-710(Review)
Certain Seamless Carbon and Alloy SteelStandard, Line and Pressure Pipe fromArgentina, Brazil, Germany, and Italy Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed
Nippon Steel Corp. v.US 391 F.Supp.2d1258 6/15/05 Eaton
701-355;731-659-660(Review)
Grain Oriented Silicon Electrical Steel from Italyand Japan Affirmative 2-2
Affirmed inpart
Remandedin part
Siderca, S.A.I.C. v. US391 F.Supp.2d 1353 8/26/05 Pogue
701-364;731-711,713-716(Review)
Oil Country Tubular Goods from Argentina,Austria, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Spain Affirmative 6-0, 4-2 Affirmed
Cogne Acciai Specialiv. US Slip Op. 05-122 9/12/05 Restani
731-770-775(Review)
Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Germany, Italy,Japan, Korea, Spain, Sweden, and Taiwan Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed
International ImagingMaterials, Inc. v.USITC Slip Op. 06-11 1/23/06 Eaton
731-1039-1040
Certain Wax and Wax/Resin Thermal TransferRibbons from France and Japan Negative 6-0 Remanded
Hynix SemiconductorInc. v. US 431F.Supp.2d 1302 4/13/06 Goldberg 701-431 DRAMS and DRAM Modules from Korea Affirmative 3-2 Remanded
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
Nippon Steel Corp. v.US 433 F.Supp.2d1336 5/9/06 Eaton
701-355;731-659-660(Review)
Grain Oriented Silicon Electrical Steel from Italyand Japan Negative 5-1 Affirmed
Elkem Metals Co. v.US 441 F.Supp.2d1292 7/21/06 Eaton
731-566-570, 641
Ferrosilicon from Brazil, China, Kazakhstan,Russia, Ukraine, and Venezuela Negative 4-0 Remanded
Cleo, Inc. v. US SlipOp. 2006-131 8/31/06 Barzilay 731-1070 Certain Tissue Paper Products from China Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed
Noviant Oy v. US 451F.Supp.2d 1267 9/12/06 Carman
731-1084-1087
Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland,Mexico, Netherlands, and Sweden Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed
Connecticut SteelCorp. v. US Slip Op.2006-159 10/31/06 Carman
731-1099-1101(Prelim)
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod fromGermany, Turkey, and the People's Republic ofChina Negative 6-0 Affirmed
Sichuan ChanghongElectric Co. v. US 466F.Supp.2d 1323 11/15/06 Eaton 731-1034 Certain Color Television Receivers from China Affirmative 5-0 Remanded
Hynix SemiconductorInc. v. US Slip Op. 06-177 12/7/06 Goldberg 701-431 DRAMS and DRAM Modules from Korea Affirmative 3-2 Affirmed
Allegheny LudlumCorp. v. US 475F.Supp.2d 1370 12/22/06 Wallach
701-381-382; 731-797-804 Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip Negative 4-2 Affirmed
Co-Steel Raritan, Inc.v. US Slip Op. 07-7 1/17/07 Aquilino
701-417-431; 731-953-965(Prelim)
Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil,Canada, Egypt, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico,Moldova, South Africa, Trinidad and Tobago,Ukraine, and Venezuela Negative 5-0
Celanese ChemicalsLtd. v. US Slip Op. 07-16 1/29/07 Ridgway
731-1088(Prelim) Polyvinyl Alcohol from Taiwan Negative 3-2 Remanded
Committee for FairBeam Imports v. US477 F.Supp.2d 1313 3/8/07 Tsoucalas
701-401;731-853-854(Review) Structural Steel Beams from Japan and Korea Negative 5-1 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
Tropicana Products,Inc. v. US 484F.Supp.2d 1330 4/12/07 Restani 731-1089 Certain Orange Juice from Brazil Affirmative 3-3 Remanded
Mittal Steel Point Lisas,Ltd. v. US 495F.Supp.2d 1374 7/6/07 Aquilino 731-961
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod fromTrinidad and Tobago Negative 3-2 Affirmed
Nevinnomysskiy Azotv. US Slip Op. 07-130 8/28/07 Barzilay
731-340E, H(SecondReview) Solid Urea from Russia and Ukraine Affirmative 3-3 Remanded
Tropicana Products,Inc. v. US Slip Op. 07-141 9/19/07 Restani 731-1089 Certain Orange Juice from Brazil Affirmative 4-2 Remanded
Wieland Werke AG v.US 525 F.Supp.2d1353 11/7/07 Wallach
701-269;731-311-314, 317(SecondReview)
Brass Sheet and Strip from Brazil, Canada,France, Germany, Italy, and Japan Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed
Consolidated Fibers,Inc. v. US 535F.Supp.2d 1345 1/10/08 Gordon
731-825-826(Review)
Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from Korea andTaiwan Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed
Mittal Steel Roman v.US Slip Op. 08-03 1/11/08 Aquilino
731-846-850(Review)
Carbon and Alloy Seemless Standard, Line,and Pressure Pipe from the Czech Republic,Japan, Mexico, Romania and South Africa Affirmative 6-0, 3-3 Affirmed
Bratsk AluminumSmelter v. US 533F.Supp.2d 1348 1/15/08 Tsoucalas 731-991 Silicon Metal from Russia Afirmative 3-2 Affirmed
Tropicana Products,Inc. v. US Slip Op. 08-17 2/5/08 Restani 731-1089 Certain Orange Juice from Brazil Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed
Diamond SawbladesManufacturersCoalition v. US SlipOp. 08-18 2/6/08 Musgrave
731-1092-1093
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof fromChina and Korea Negative 4-2 Remanded
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands
Navneet Publications(India) Ltd. V. US SlipOp. 08-22 2/26/08 Eaton
701-442-443; 731-1095-1097
Certain Lined Paper School Supplies fromChina, India, and Indonesia Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed
Globe Metallurgical,Inc. v. US 547F.Supp.2d 1371 3/19/08 Tsoucalas
731-471(SecondReview) Silicon Metal From Brazil Negative 6-0 Affirmed
Nevinnomysskiy Azotv. US Slip Op. 08-64 6/9/08 Barzilay
731-340E, H(SecondReview) Solid Urea from Russia and Ukraine Affirmative 4-2
Nucor Corp. v. US SlipOp. 08-74 7/9/08 Tsoucalas
AA 1921-197; 701-TA-319-320, 325-327, 348,350; 731-TA-573-574, 576,578, 582-587, 612,and 614-618(SecondReview)
Certain Carbon Steel Products From Australia,Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France,Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Poland,Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and theUnited Kingdom Negative 6-0 Affirmed
Consolidated Fibers,Inc. v. US Slip Op. 08-80 7/22/08 Gordon
731-825-826(Review)
Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from Korea andTaiwan Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed
U.S. COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
LISTING OF DECISIONS BY DECIDING JUDGE
REVIEWING USITC AD/CVD DETERMINATIONS
(January 1980-July 2008)
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
Yuasa-General BatteryCorp. v. US 661F.Supp. 1214 5/22/87 Aquilino
731-238(Prelim) 12 volt motorcycle batteries from Japan Negative 5-0 Remanded
Keyes Fibre Co. v. US682 F.Supp. 583 3/16/88 Aquilino 731-201 Egg filler flats from Canada Negative 5-0 RemandedYuasa-General BatteryCorp. v. US 688F.Supp. 1551 7/12/88 Aquilino
731-238(Prelim) 12 volt motorcycle batteries from Japan Negative 6-0 Reversed
Keyes Fibre Co. v. US691 F.Supp. 376 7/22/88 Aquilino 731-201 Egg filler flats from Canada Negative 4-2 RemandedRoses, Inc. v. US 720F.Supp. 180 8/18/89 Aquilino 731-148 Fresh cut roses from Colombia Negative 3-1 Affirmed
MBL (USA) andMitsubishi Belting Ltd.V. US 733 F.Supp. 379 3/14/90 Aquilino
701-293-295, 731-412-419
Industrial belts from Israel, Italy, Japan,Singapore, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, theUK, and West Germany Affirmative 3-3
Summaryjudgmentpartially
dismissed,partiallygranted
United Engineeringand Forging v. US 779F.Supp. 1375 11/18/91 Aquilino
701-282;731-351,353
Certain Forged steel crankshafts from theFederal Republic of Germany and the UnitedKingdom Affirmative 4-1 Affirmed
Bando ChemicalIndustries, Ltd. v. US787 F.Supp. 224 3/5/92 Aquilino
701-293;731-412-419
Industrial belts from Israel, Italy, Japan,Singapore, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, theUK, and West Germany Affirmative 3-3 Remanded
Bando ChemicalIndustries, Ltd. v. US17 CIT 798 8/6/93 Aquilino
701-293;731-412-419
Industrial belts from Israel, Italy, Japan,Singapore, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, theUK, and West Germany Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed
Makita Corp. v. US 974F.Supp. 770 7/8/97 Aquilino 731-571
Professional Electric Cutting andSanding/Grinding Tools from Japan Affirmative Various
Actiondismissed
Co-Steel Raritan, Inc.v. US 244 F.Supp.2d1349 6/20/02 Aquilino
701-417-431; 731-953-965(Prelim)
Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil,Canada, Egypt, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico,Moldova, South Africa, Trinidad and Tobago,Ukraine, and Venezuela Negative 4-1 Remanded
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
Co-Steel Raritan, Inc.v. US Slip Op. 02-113 9/13/02 Aquilino
701-417-431; 731-953-965(Prelim)
Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil,Canada, Egypt, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico,Moldova, South Africa, Trinidad and Tobago,Ukraine, and Venezuela Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed
Olin Corp.-BrassGroup v. US Slip Op.04-04 1/9/04 Aquilino
701-269-270; 731-311-317,379-380(Review)
Brass Sheet and Strip from Brazil, Canada,France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, theNetherlands, and Sweden Negative 4-2 Affirmed
Caribbean Ispat Ltd. v.US 366 F.Supp.2d1300 3/22/05 Aquilino
701-417-421; 731-953-963
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod fromBrazil, Canada, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico,Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed
Remanded[by CAFC]
Co-Steel Raritan, Inc.v. US Slip Op. 05-63 6/7/05 Aquilino
701-417-431; 731-953-965(Prelim)
Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil,Canada, Egypt, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico,Moldova, South Africa, Trinidad and Tobago,Ukraine, and Venezuela Negative 2-1 Remanded
Co-Steel Raritan, Inc.v. US Slip Op. 07-7 1/17/07 Aquilino
701-417-431; 731-953-965(Prelim)
Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil,Canada, Egypt, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico,Moldova, South Africa, Trinidad and Tobago,Ukraine, and Venezuela Negative 5-0
Mittal Steel Point Lisas,Ltd. v. US 495F.Supp.2d 1374 7/6/07 Aquilino 731-961
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod fromTrinidad and Tobago Negative 3-2 Affirmed
Mittal Steel Roman v.US Slip Op. 08-03 1/11/08 Aquilino
731-846-850(Review)
Carbon and Alloy Seemless Standard, Line,and Pressure Pipe from the Czech Republic,Japan, Mexico, Romania and South Africa Affirmative 6-0, 3-3 Affirmed
USEC Inc. v. US 132F.Supp.2d 1 1/24/01 Barzilay 731-539 Uranium from Kazakhstan Negative 3-0 AffirmedTitanium Metals Corp.v. US 155 F.Supp.2d750 6/22/01 Barzilay
731-161(Review) Titanium Sponge from Japan Negative 3-0 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
Committee of DomesticSteel Wire Rope &Specialty Cable Mfrs.v. US 201 F.Supp.2d1287 4/5/02 Barzilay
731-868-869
Steel Wire Rope from India and the People'sRepublic of China Negative 6-0 Affirmed
Committee for FairBeam Imports v. USSlip Op. 03-73 6/27/03 Barzilay
731-935-936, 938-942
Structural Steel Beams from China, Germany,Italy, Luxembourg, Russia, South Africa, Spainand Taiwan Negative 4-1 Affirmed
Cleo, Inc. v. US SlipOp. 2006-131 8/31/06 Barzilay 731-1070 Certain Tissue Paper Products from China Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed
Nevinnomysskiy Azotv. US Slip Op. 07-130 8/28/07 Barzilay
731-340E, H(SecondReview) Solid Urea from Russia and Ukraine Affirmative 3-3 Remanded
Nevinnomysskiy Azotv. US Slip Op. 08-64 6/9/08 Barzilay
731-340E, H(SecondReview) Solid Urea from Russia and Ukraine Affirmative 4-2
Budd Co. Ry. Div. v.US 507 F.Supp. 997 12/29/80 Boe
731-5 and6 (Prelim)
Rail Passenger Cars and parts thereof intendedfor use as original equipment in the UnitedStates from Italy and Japan Negative 5-0 Remanded
Freres v. US 6 CIT 42 7/18/83 Boe 731-44 Sorbitol from France Affirmative 4-2 RemandedFreres v. US 583F.Supp. 599 3/19/84 Boe 731-44 Sorbitol from France Affirmative 4-0, 3-1 AffirmedBingham & Taylor v.US 627 F.Supp. 793 2/14/86 Carman
701-249(Prelim) Iron construction castings from Brazil Negative 3-2 Remanded
Kenda RubberIndustrial Co. Ltd v. US630 F. Supp. 354 2/24/86 Carman 731-166 Bicycle Tires and Tubes from Taiwan Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed
Kokusai Electric Co. v.US 632 F. Supp 23 3/14/86 Carman 731-163
Certain cell-site radio apparatus andsubassemblies thereof from Japan Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed
Hercules Inc. v. US673 F. Supp. 454 10/20/87 Carman
731-96;701-190 Nitrocellulose from France Affirmative 2-1 Affirmed
Empire Plow Co. v. US675 F. Sup. 1348 11/18/87 Carman 701-223 Agricultural tillage tools from Brazil Negative 3-2 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
Wells Mfg. Co. v. US677 F.Supp. 1239 12/8/87 Carman
701-208(Prelim) Iron bars from Brazil Negative 4-0 Affirmed
Copperweld Corp. v.US 682 F.Supp. 552 2/24/88 Carman 731-254
Heavy-walled rectangular welded carbon steelpipes and tubes from Canada Negative 4-0 Affirmed
Chaparral Steel Co. v.US 698 F.Supp. 254 9/28/88 Carman 731-234
Carbon steel angles, shapes, and sections fromNorway Negative 4-1 Remanded
Mitsubishi ElectricCopr v. US 700 F.Supp 538 10/31/88 Carman 731-207
Cellular Mobile Telephones and assembliesthereof from Japan Affirmative 4-1 Remanded
Borlem S.A.EmpreedimentosIndustriais v. US 710F.Supp. 797 3/22/89 Carman 731-335 Tubeless steel disk wheels from Brazil Affirmative 4-1 RemandedSandvik AB v. US 721F.Supp. 1322 9/14/89 Carman 731-354 Stainless steel pipes and tubes from Sweden Affirmative 4-1 AffirmedTrent Tube Division v.US 741 F.Supp. 921 6/20/90 Carman 731-354 Stainless steel pipes and tubes from Sweden Negative 3-2
Remandedin part
Trent Tube Division v.US 752 F.Supp. 468 11/27/90 Carman 731-354 Stainless steel pipes and tubes from Sweden Affirmative 3-2 AffirmedBorlem S.A.EmpreedimentosIndustriais v. US 786F.Supp. 1031 3/3/92 Carman 731-335 Tubeless steel disk wheels from Brazil Negative 4-1 AffirmedCemex v. US 790F.Supp. 290 4/7/92 Carman 731-451
Gray portland cement and cement clinker fromMexico Affirmative 2-1 Affirmed
Calabrian Corp v.USITC 794 F. Supp.377 5/13/92 Carman
701-303;731-465-468(Prelim)
Certain sodium sulfur chemical compoundsfrom West Germany, China, Turkey, and theUnited Kingdom Negative Various Dismissed
Chung Ling Co. v. US805 F.Supp. 45 7/28/92 Carman
731-448-450
Sweaters wholly or in chief weight of man-madefiber from Hong Kong, the Republic of Korea,and Taiwan Affirmative 2-1 Remanded
Texas Crushed StoneCo. v. US 822 F.Supp.773 5/25/93 Carman
731-562(Prelim) Crushed Limestone from Mexico Negative 5-0 Affirmed
Feldspar Corp. v. US825 F.Supp. 1095 6/23/93 Carman 731-525 Nepheline Syenite from Canada Negative 6-0 Dismissed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
Chung Ling Co. v. US829 F.Supp. 1353 8/11/93 Carman
731-448-450
Sweaters wholly or in chief weight of man-madefiber from Hong Kong, the Republic of Korea,and Taiwan Negative 6-0 Affirmed
Saarstahl AG v. US858 F.Supp 196 6/24/94 Carman
701-314-317; 731-552-555
Certain Hot-Rolled Lead and Bismuth CarbonSteel Products from Brazil, France, Germany,and the United Kingdom Negative 5-1 Affirmed
Ranchers-CattlemenAction LegalFoundation v. US 74F.Supp.2d 1353 11/5/99 Carman
701-386;731-812-813(Prelim) Live Cattle from Canada and Mexico Negative 5-1 Affirmed
Indorama Chemicals(Thailand) Ltd. V.USITC Slip Op. 02-1-4 9/4/02 Carman
731-703,705(Review)
Furfuryl Alcohol from the People's Republic ofChina and Thailand Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed
Nucor Corp. v. US 318F.Supp. 2d 1207 2/19/04 Carman
731-965,971-972,979, 981
Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Products fromAustralia, India, Japan, Sweden, and Thailand Negative 4-1 Affirmed
Noviant Oy v. US 451F.Supp.2d 1267 9/12/06 Carman
731-1084-1087
Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland,Mexico, Netherlands, and Sweden Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed
Connecticut SteelCorp. v. US Slip Op.2006-159 10/31/06 Carman
731-1099-1101(Prelim)
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod fromGermany, Turkey, and the People's Republic ofChina Negative 6-0 Affirmed
American Lamb Co. v.US 611 F.Supp. 979 5/31/85 DiCarlo
701-214(Prelim) Lamb meat from New Zealand Negative 4-2 Remanded
Luciano PisoniFabbrica AccessoriInstrumenti Musicali v.US 640 F. Supp. 255 6/12/85 DiCarlo 731-152 Pads for woodwind instrument keys from Italy Affirmative 3-2
Remandedto
CommercePhilipp Brothers, Inc. v.US 640 F.Supp. 1340 7/17/86 DiCarlo 731-161 Titanium Sponge from Japan Affirmative 4-1 Affirmed
Hyundai Pipe Co. v.USTIC 670 F.Supp.357 2/23/87 DiCarlo
731-131-132, 138
Certain welded carbon steel pipes from theRepublic of Korea and Taiwan, Certainrectangular welded carbon steel pipes andtubes from the Republic of Korea Affirmative
4-0, 3-1,3-1, 4-0 Dismissed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
National PorkProducers Council v.US 661 F.Supp. 633 5/28/87 DiCarlo 701-224 Live swine and pork from Canada Negative 2-1 AffirmedAlberta PorkProducers' Mktg. Bd. v.US 669 F.Supp. 445 8/7/87 DiCarlo 701-224 Live swine and pork from Canada Affirmative 2-1 RemandedAlberta PorkProducers' Mktg. Bd. v.US 683 F.Supp. 1398 3/22/88 DiCarlo 701-224 Live swine and pork from Canada Affirmative 2-1 AffirmedMaverick Tube Corp. v.US 687 F. Supp. 1569 5/24/88 DiCarlo
731-375(Prelim) Certain line pipes and tubes from Canada Negative 4-1 Remanded
National Ass'n of MirrorMfrs. v. US 696F.Supp. 642 8/25/88 DiCarlo
731-320-325
Certain unfinished mirrors from Belgium,Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Japan,Portugal, and the United Kingdom Negative 5-0, 4-1 Affirmed
Negev Phosphates v.US DOC and USITC699 F.Supp. 938 11/9/88 DiCarlo
701-286;731-365-366 Industrial phophoric acid from Belgium Affirmative 3-2 Affirmed
Citrosuco Paulista v.US 704 F.Supp. 1075 12/30/88 DiCarlo 731-326 Frozen concentrated orange juice from Brazil Affirmative 5-1 RemandedCitrosuco Paulista v.US 706 F.Supp. 1333 3/13/89 DiCarlo 731-326 Frozen concentrated orange juice from Brazil Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed
Hannibal Industries v.US 710 F.Supp. 332 3/17/89 DiCarlo 731-349
Certain welded carbon steel pipes and tubesfrom Taiwan Negative 3-2 Remanded
LMI-La MetalliIndustriale v. US 712F. Supp 959 4/11/89 DiCarlo
701-270;731-313-314, 316-317
Certain brass sheet and strip from France, Italy,Sweden, and West Germany Affirmative 3-2 Affirmed
Granges MetallverkenAB v. US 716 F. Supp.17 6/7/89 DiCarlo
701-270;731-313-314, 316-317
Certain brass sheet and strip from France, Italy,Sweden, and West Germany Affirmative 3-2 Dismissed
Wieland Werke AG v.US 718 F.Supp. 50 7/10/89 DiCarlo
701-270;731-313-314, 316-317
Certain brass sheet and strip from France, Italy,Sweden, and West Germany Affirmative 3-2 Affirmed
MetallverkenNederland BV v. US728 F. Supp. 730 12/18/89 DiCarlo
731-379-380
Certain brass sheet and strip from Japan andthe Netherlands Affirmative 3-3 Remanded
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
Cambridge LeeIndustries v. US 728F.Supp. 748 12/21/89 DiCarlo
731-379-380
Certain brass sheet and strip from Japan andthe Netherlands Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed
Remandedin part
MetallverkenNederland BV v. US728 F. Supp. 730 7/20/90 DiCarlo
731-379-380
Certain brass sheet and strip from Japan andthe Netherlands Affirmative 4-2 Dismissed
Torrington Co. v. US790 F.Supp. 1161 4/3/92 DiCarlo
701-307;731-498-511(Prelim)
Ball Bearings, Mounted or Unmounted andParts Thereof, from Argentina, Austria, Brazil,Canada, Hong Kong, Hungary, Mexico, thePeople's Republic of China, Poland, theRepublic of Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey, andYugoslavia Negative 3-1 Affirmed
Connecticut SteelCorp. v. US 852F.Supp. 1061 4/22/94 DiCarlo
731-649(Prelim) Steel Wire Rod from Trinidad and Tobago Negative 5-1 Affirmed
Grupo IndustrialCamesa v. U.S. 853 F.Supp. 440 5/18/94 DiCarlo
731-546-547
Steel Wire Rope from the Republic of Koreaand Mexico Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed
Elkem Metals Co. v.US 193 F.Supp.2d1314 2/21/02 Eaton
731-566-570, 641
Ferrosilicon from Brazil, China, Kazakhstan,Russia, Ukraine, and Venezuela Negative 6-0 Remanded
Nippon Steel Corp. v.US Slip Op. 02-153 12/24/02 Eaton
701-355;731-659-660(Review)
Grain Oriented Silicon Electrical Steel from Italyand Japan Affirmative 3-3 Remanded
Committee for FairCoke Trade v. US 27CIT 774 5/20/03 Eaton
731-951-952(Prelim) Blast Furnace Coke from China and Japan Negative 3-2 Remanded
Elkem Metals Co. v.US 276 F.Supp.2d1296 6/18/03 Eaton
731-566-570, 641
Ferrosilicon from Brazil, China, Kazakhstan,Russia, Ukraine, and Venezuela Negative 5-0 Remanded
Nippon Steel Corp. v.US 301 F.Supp.2d1367 12/17/03 Eaton
701-355;731-659-660(Review)
Grain Oriented Silicon Electrical Steel from Italyand Japan Affirmative 2-2 Remanded
Elkem Metals Co. v.US 342 F.Supp.2d1207 5/12/04 Eaton
731-566-570, 641
Ferrosilicon from Brazil, China, Kazakhstan,Russia, Ukraine, and Venezuela Negative 4-0 Remanded
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
Committee for FairCoke Trade v. US SlipOp. 04-68 6/10/04 Eaton
731-951-952(Prelim) Blast Furnace Coke from China and Japan Negative 2-1 Affirmed
American BearingManufacturersAssociation v. US 350F.Supp.2d 1100 9/16/04 Eaton 731-989 Ball Bearings from China Negative 4-0 Affirmed
Nippon Steel Corp. v.US 391 F.Supp.2d1258 6/15/05 Eaton
701-355;731-659-660(Review)
Grain Oriented Silicon Electrical Steel from Italyand Japan Affirmative 2-2
Affirmed inpart
Remandedin part
International ImagingMaterials, Inc. v.USITC Slip Op. 06-11 1/23/06 Eaton
731-1039-1040
Certain Wax and Wax/Resin Thermal TransferRibbons from France and Japan Negative 6-0 Remanded
Nippon Steel Corp. v.US 433 F.Supp.2d1336 5/9/06 Eaton
701-355;731-659-660(Review)
Grain Oriented Silicon Electrical Steel from Italyand Japan Negative 5-1 Affirmed
Elkem Metals Co. v.US 441 F.Supp.2d1292 7/21/06 Eaton
731-566-570, 641
Ferrosilicon from Brazil, China, Kazakhstan,Russia, Ukraine, and Venezuela Negative 4-0 Remanded
Sichuan ChanghongElectric Co. v. US 466F.Supp.2d 1323 11/15/06 Eaton 731-1034 Certain Color Television Receivers from China Affirmative 5-0 Remanded
Navneet Publications(India) Ltd. V. US SlipOp. 08-22 2/26/08 Eaton
701-442-443; 731-1095-1097
Certain Lined Paper School Supplies fromChina, India, and Indonesia Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed
Armco Inc. v. US 570F.Supp. 51 8/22/83 Ford 731-26 Certain Steel Wire Nails from Korea Negative 3-2 AffirmedChr. Bjelland SeafoodsA/S v. US 16 CIT 945 10/23/92 Goldberg
701-302;731-454 Fresh and chilled Atlantic salmon from Norway Affirmative 3-1 Reversed Remanded
Tianjin MachineryImport and ExportCorp. v. US 16 CIT1020 12/1/92 Goldberg 731-457
Heavy Forged Hand Tools from the People'sRepublic of China Affirmative 4-0 Remanded
Hosiden Corp v. US810 F. Supp. 322 12/29/92 Goldberg 731-469
High-Information Content Flat Panel Displaysand Subassemblies Thereof from Japan Affirmative 3-1 Reversed Remanded
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
Mitsubishi MaterialsCorp. v. US 820 F.Supp. 608 4/27/93 Goldberg 731-461
Gray portland cement and cement clinker fromJapan Affirmative 3-1
Affirmed inpart
Remandedin part
Tianjin MachineryImport and ExportCorp. v. US 820F.Supp. 1456 4/27/93 Goldberg 731-457
Heavy Forged Hand Tools from the People'sRepublic of China Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed
Hosiden Corp v. US852 F. Supp. 1050 4/14/94 Goldberg 731-469
High-Information Content Flat Panel Displaysand Subassemblies Thereof from Japan
Affirmative/Negative 3-3, 4-2 Affirmed
Chr. Bjelland SeafoodsA/S v. US 19 CIT 35 1/18/95 Goldberg
701-302;731-454 Fresh Chilled Atlantic Salmon from Norway Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed
Mitsubishi MaterialsCorp. v. US 918 F.Supp. 422 2/29/96 Goldberg 731-461
Gray portland cement and cement clinker fromJapan Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed
Hyundai ElectronicsIndustries Co. v.USITC 20 CIT 805 7/5/96 Goldberg 731-556
Drams of one Megabit and Above from theRepublic of Korea Affirmative 3-3 Remanded
Mukand v. US 937 f.Supp 910 8/2/96 Goldberg 731-638 Stainless Steel Wire Rod from India Affirmative 4-2 AffirmedBIC Corp. v. US 964F.Supp. 391 4/24/97 Goldberg
731-700-701 Disposable Lighters from China and Thailand Negative 4-2 Affirmed
Hyundai ElectronicsIndustries Co. v.USITC CIT Slip Op.97-53 5/2/97 Goldberg 731-556
Drams of one Megabit and Above from theRepublic of Korea Affirmative 3-1 Affirmed
Asociacion deProductores deSalmon y Trucha deChile v. USITC SlipOp. 99-58 7/2/99 Goldberg 731-768 Fresh Atlantic Salmon from Chile Affirmative 2-1 RemandedAsociacion deProductores deSalmon y Trucha deChile v. USITC 24 CIT654 7/27/00 Goldberg 731-768 Fresh Atlantic Salmon from Chile Affirmative 5-1 Remanded
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
Asociacion deProductores deSalmon y Trucha deChile v. USITC 24 CIT969 9/8/00 Goldberg 731-768 Fresh Atlantic Salmon from Chile Affirmative 5-1 RemandedAsociacion deProductores deSalmon y Trucha deChile v. USITC 180F.Supp.2d 1360 1/9/02 Goldberg 731-768 Fresh Atlantic Salmon from Chile Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed
Ugine-Savoie Imphy v.US Slip Op. 02-79 7/31/02 Goldberg
701-178;731-636-638(Review)
Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, France,India, and Spain Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed
United States SteelCorp. v. US 294F.Supp.2d 1359 10/28/03 Goldberg
701-393-396; 731-829-840
Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Products fromArgentina, Brazil, Japan, Russia, South Africa,and Thailand Negative 5-1 Remanded
United States SteelCorp. v. US 350F.Supp.2d 1276 11/18/04 Goldberg
701-393-396; 731-829-840
Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Products fromArgentina, Brazil, Japan, Russia, South Africa,and Thailand Negative 5-1 Affirmed
Nitrogen Solutions FairTrade Committee v.US 358 F.Supp.2d1314 1/31/05 Goldberg
731-1006,1008-1009
Urea Ammonium Nitrate Solutions fromBelarus, Russia, and Ukraine Negative 4-0 Affirmed
Hynix SemiconductorInc. v. US 431F.Supp.2d 1302 4/13/06 Goldberg 701-431 DRAMS and DRAM Modules from Korea Affirmative 3-2 RemandedHynix SemiconductorInc. v. US Slip Op. 06-177 12/7/06 Goldberg 701-431 DRAMS and DRAM Modules from Korea Affirmative 3-2 AffirmedConsolidated Fibers,Inc. v. US 535F.Supp.2d 1345 1/10/08 Gordon
731-825-826(Review)
Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from Korea andTaiwan Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed
Consolidated Fibers,Inc. v. US Slip Op. 08-80 7/22/08 Gordon
731-825-826(Review)
Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from Korea andTaiwan Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed
American Spring WireCorp (and Armco Inc.)v. US 590 F.Supp.1273 7/11/84 Maletz 731-26 Certain Steel Wire Nails from Korea Negative 3-2 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
Sony Corporation ofAmerica v. US 712F.Supp. 978 4/26/89 Musgrave
731-367-370
Color Picture Tubes from Canada, Japan, theRepublic of Korea, and Singapore Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed
Suramericana deAleaciones Laminidas,C.A. v. US 746 F.Supp.139 8/22/90 Musgrave
701-287;731-378
Certain Electrical Conductor Aluminum RedrawRod from Venezuela Affirmative 4-0 Vacated
Remanded[by CAFC]
Camargo CorreaMetais v. US 17 CIT 35 1/22/93 Musgrave 731-471 Silicon Metal From Brazil Affirmative 4-0 AffirmedSuramericana deAleaciones Laminidas,C.A. v. US 818 F.Supp.348 3/15/93 Musgrave
701-287;731-378
Certain Electrical Conductor Aluminum RedrawRod from Venezuela Affirmative 4-0 Remanded
Suramericana deAleaciones Laminidas,C.A. v. US 841 F.Supp.1220 8/4/93 Musgrave
701-287;731-378
Certain Electrical Conductor Aluminum RedrawRod from Venezuela Negative 4-2 Affirmed
Aristech ChemicalCorp. v. US Slip Op.96-51 3/11/96 Musgrave
701-358;731-667(Prelim) Phthalic Anhydride from Mexico Negative 5-1 Affirmed
Sensient TechnologiesCorp v. US Slip Op.04-115 9/10/04 Musgrave
701-433;731-1029(Prelim) Allura Red Coloring from India Negative 4-0 Affirmed
Diamond SawbladesManufacturersCoalition v. US SlipOp. 08-18 2/6/08 Musgrave
731-1092-1093
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof fromChina and Korea Negative 4-2 Remanded
British Steel Corp. v.US 593 F.Supp. 405 8/6/84 Newman 701-196 Stainless Steel Plate from the United Kingdom Affirmative 3-0 DismissedJeannette Sheet GlassCorp v. US 607F.Supp. 123 3/22/85 Newman
731-127-129(Prelim)
Thin sheet glass from Switzerland, Belgium andthe Federal Republic of Germany Negative 3-1 Remanded
Jeannette Sheet GlassCorp v. US 654F.Supp. 179 1/9/87 Newman
731-127-129(Prelim)
Thin sheet glass from Switzerland, Belgium andthe Federal Republic of Germany Negative 5-0 Affirmed
Gerald Metals Inc v.US 937 F. Supp. 930 8/21/96 Pogue
731-696-698 Magnesium from China, Russia, and Ukraine Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
Guangxi Gitric Import &Export Corp v. U.S.955 F.Supp. 1477 1/8/97 Pogue
731-726-727, 729
Polyvinyl Alcohol from China, Japan, andTaiwan Affirmative 3-3 Dismissed
Gerald Metals Inc v.US 8 F. Supp.2d 861 4/28/98 Pogue
731-696-698 Magnesium from China, Russia, and Ukraine Affirmative 3-3
Vacatedprevious Remanded
Goss Graphics SystemInc. v. US 33F.Supp.2d 1082 10/16/98 Pogue
731-736-737
Large Newspaper Printing Presses andComponents Thereof, Whether Assembled orUnassembled, from Germany and Japan Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed
Gerald Metals Inc v.US 27 F.Supp.2d 1351 10/20/98 Pogue
731-696-698 Magnesium from China, Russia, and Ukraine Negative 2-1 Affirmed
NEC Corp. v. US DOCand USITC 36F.Supp.2d 380 12/15/98 Pogue 731-750 Vector Supercomputers from Japan Affirmative 3-0 RemandedTaiwan SemiconductorIndustry Association v.US 59 F.Supp.2d 1324 6/30/99 Pogue
731-761-762
Static Random Access MemorySemiconductors from the Republic of Korea andTaiwan Affirmative 1-1 Remanded
NEC Corp. v. US DOCand USITC 83F.Supp.2d 1339 12/17/99 Pogue 731-750 Vector Supercomputers from Japan Affirmative 3-1 AffirmedTaiwan SemiconductorIndustry Association v.US 93 F.Supp.2d1283/105 F.Supp.2d1363 4/11/00 Pogue
731-761-762
Static Random Access MemorySemiconductors from the Republic of Korea andTaiwan Negative 4-1 Remanded
Taiwan SemiconductorIndustry Association v.US 118 F.Supp.2d1250 8/29/00 Pogue
731-761-762
Static Random Access MemorySemiconductors from the Republic of Korea andTaiwan Negative 4-1 Affirmed
Steel Authority of Indiav. US 146 F.Supp.2d900 5/22/01 Pogue
701-387-391; 731-816-821
Certain Cut to Length Steel Plate from France,India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, and Korea Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed
Chefline Corp. v. US170 F.Supp.2d 1320 9/26/01 Pogue
701-267-268; 731-297-299,304-305(Review)
Certain Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware fromChina, Taiwan, and Mexico and Top-of-the-Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware from Koreaand Taiwan Affirmative 3-3 Remanded
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
Chefline Corp. v. US219 F.Supp.2d 1303 8/5/02 Pogue
701-267-268; 731-297-299,304-305(Review)
Certain Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware fromChina, Taiwan, and Mexico and Top-of-the-Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware from Koreaand Taiwan Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed
Siderca, S.A.I.C. v. US350 F.Supp.2d 1223 10/27/04 Pogue
701-362;731-707-710(Review)
Certain Seamless Carbon and Alloy SteelStandard, Line and Pressure Pipe fromArgentina, Brazil, Germany, and Italy Affirmative 6-0 Remanded
Siderca, S.A.I.C. v. US374 F.Supp.2d 1285 6/9/05 Pogue
701-362;731-707-710(Review)
Certain Seamless Carbon and Alloy SteelStandard, Line and Pressure Pipe fromArgentina, Brazil, Germany, and Italy Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed
Siderca, S.A.I.C. v. US391 F.Supp.2d 1353 8/26/05 Pogue
701-364;731-711,713-716(Review)
Oil Country Tubular Goods from Argentina,Austria, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Spain Affirmative 6-0, 4-2 Affirmed
Asahi Chemical Indus.Co. v. US 692 F.Supp.1376 7/25/88 Rao 731-1, 2 Spun acrylic yarn from Japan and Italy Affirmative 5-0 RemandedRhone Poulenc v. US592 F.Supp. 1318 7/19/84 Restani 731-25 Anhydrous Sodium Metasilicate from France Affirmative 5-0 AffirmedMaine Potato Councilv. US 613 F.Supp.1237 6/27/85 Restani 731-124 Certain Fresh Potatoes from Canada Negative 3-0 RemandedGifford-Hill Cement Co.v. US 615 F.Supp. 577 7/31/85 Restani
731-108-109 Portland Cement from Australia and Japan Negative 4-0 Affirmed
Lone Star Steel v. US650 F.Supp. 183 11/28/86 Restani 731-191
Oil Country Tubular Goods from Argentina,Brazil, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, andSpain Negative 5-0 Affirmed
USX Corporation v.United States 655F.Supp. 487 2/9/87 Restani 731-175
Cold-rolled carbon steel sheet from Argentina,South Africa and Spain Negative 4-0, 3-1 Remanded
BMT Commodity Corp.v. US 667 F.Supp. 880 7/22/87 Restani 731-199 Certain dried salted codfish from Canada Affirmative 4-1 AffirmedUSX Corporation v.United States 682F.Supp. 60 3/15/88 Restani 731-175
Cold-rolled carbon steel plates and sheets fromArgentina Negative 4-1 Remanded
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
Algoma Steel Corp Ltdv. US 688 F.Supp. 639 6/8/88 Restani
731-276-277
Oil Country Tubular goods from Canada andTaiwan Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed
AssociacionColombiana deExportadores de Floresv. US 693 F.Supp.1165 7/14/88 Restani
701-275-278; 731-327-333
Certain fresh cut flowers from Canada, Chile,Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Kenya, andMexico Affirmative 3-2 Remanded
USX Corporation v.United States 698F.Supp. 234 9/16/88 Restani 731-175
Cold-rolled carbon steel plates and sheets fromArgentina Negative 4-1 Affirmed
AssociacionColombiana deExportadores de Floresv. US 704 F.Supp.1068 12/27/88 Restani
701-275-278; 731-327-333
Certain fresh cut flowers from Canada, Chile,Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Kenya, andMexico Negative 5-0 Affirmed
Florex v. US 705 F.Supp. 582 1/6/89 Restani 731-333 Certain fresh cut flowers from Mexico Affirmative 3-2 AffirmedBrother Industries Ltdv. US 787 F.Supp.1454 3/12/92 Restani 731-483 Certain personal word processors from Japan Affirmative 4-0 Dismissed
Encon Industries v. US16 CIT 840 9/24/92 Restani 731-473
Certain Electric Fans From the People'sRepublic of China and Taiwan Affirmative 3-1 Affirmed
Holmes Products Corpv. US 16 CIT 1101 12/30/92 Restani 731-473
Certain Electric Fans From the People'sRepublic of China and Taiwan Affirmative 3-1 Remanded
General Motors Corp.v. USITC 827 F.Supp.774 7/12/93 Restani 731-522 Minivans from Japan Negative 4-2 Affirmed
R-M Industries v. US848 F.Supp. 204 3/18/94 Restani
701-318;731-560-561
Sulfanilic Acid from the Republic of Hungaryand India Negative 4-2 Remanded
R-M Industries v. US18 CIT 577 6/14/94 Restani
701-318;731-560-561
Sulfanilic Acid from the Republic of Hungaryand India
Affirmative/Negative 4-2; 4-2 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
United States SteelGroup v. US 873F.Supp. 673 12/30/94 Restani
701-319-332, 334,336-342,344, 347-353; 731-573-579,581-592,594-597,599-609,612-619
Certain Flat-Rolled Steel Products fromAustralia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada,Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea,Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland,Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UnitedKingdom Negative 5-1; 4-2 Affirmed
Kern-Liebers USAv.US 19 cIT 87 1/27/95 Restani
701-319-332, 334,336-342,344, 347-353; 731-573-579,581-592,594-597,599-609,612-619
Certain Flat-Rolled Steel Products fromAustralia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada,Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea,Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland,Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UnitedKingdom
Affirmative/Negative Various Affirmed
Nippon Steel Corp. v.US 19 CIT 450 4/3/95 Restani
701-319-332, 334,336-342,344, 347-353; 731-573-579,581-592,594-597,599-609,612-619
Certain Flat-Rolled Steel Products fromAustralia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada,Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea,Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland,Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UnitedKingdom Affirmative Various
Affirmed inpart
Remanded inpart
Nippon Steel Corp. v.US 19 CIT 827 6/9/95 Restani
701-319-332, 334,336-342,344, 347-353; 731-573-579,581-592,594-597,599-609,612-619
Certain Flat-Rolled Steel Products fromAustralia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada,Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea,Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland,Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UnitedKingdom Affirmative Various Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
Acciai Speciali Terni v.US 19 CIT 1051 8/7/95 Restani
701-355;731-659-660
Grain Oriented Silicon Electrical Steel from Italyand Japan Affirmative 3-1, 5-0 Affirmed
Companhia Paulista v.US 20 CIT 473 4/15/96 Restani
731-671-674
Silicomanganese from Brazil, the People'sRepublic of China, Ukraine, and Venezuela Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed
Floral Trade Council v.US 20 CIT 595 5/17/96 Restani
731-684-685 Fresh Cut Roses from Colombia and Ecuador Negative 4-2 Affirmed
Ad Hoc Committee ofDomestic UraniumProduers v. US 162F.Supp.2d 649 8/14/01 Restani
731-539-C, E, andF(Review) Uranium from Russia, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan Negative 5-0 Affirmed
Far Eastern Textile Ltdv. USITC slip Op. 01-102 8/14/01 Restani
731-825-826
Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from Korea andTaiwan Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed
ALTX Inc. v. US 167F.Supp.2d 1353 9/19/01 Restani 731-859
Circular Seamless Stainless Steel HollowProducts from Japan Negative 4-2 Remanded
Nippon Steel Corp. v.US 182 F.Supp.2d1330 12/31/01 Restani 731-860
Tin and Chromium Coated Steel Sheet fromJapan Affirmative 4-2 Remanded
Usinor Industeel v. USSlip Op. 02-39 4/29/02 Restani
701-319;731-573(Review) Certain Cut to Length Steel Plate from Belgium Affirmative 6-0 Remanded
ALTX Inc. v. US 26 CIT709 7/12/02 Restani 731-859
Circular Seamless Stainless Steel HollowProducts from Japan Affirmative 3-3 Remanded
Nippon Steel Corp. v.US 223 F.Supp.2d1349 8/9/02 Restani 731-860
Tin and Chromium Coated Steel Sheet fromJapan Affirmative 4-2 Vacated
Usinor Industeel v. US26 CIT 1402 12/20/02 Restani
701-319;731-573(Review) Certain Cut to Length Steel Plate from Belgium Affirmative 4-0 Remanded
ALTX Inc. v. US SlipOp. 02-154 12/31/02 Restani 731-859
Circular Seamless Stainless Steel HollowProducts from Japan Negative 3-2 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
Corus Staal v. USITCSlip Op. 03-32 3/21/03 Restani
701-405-408; 731-899-904,906-908
Hot Rolled Steel Products from China, India,Indonesia, Kazakhstan, the Netherlands,Romania, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, andUkraine Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed
Usinor Industeel v. USSlip Op. 03-118 9/8/03 Restani
701-319;731-573(Review) Certain Cut to Length Steel Plate from Belgium Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed
Nippon Steel Corp. v.US 350 F.Supp.2d1186 10/14/04 Restani 731-860
Tin and Chromium Coated Steel Sheet fromJapan Affirmative 4-2 Remanded
Allied Mineral ProductsInc. v. US Slip Op. 04-139 11/12/04 Restani 731-1022 Refined Brown Aluminum Oxide from China Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed
Nippon Steel Corp. v.US Slip Op. 05-38 3/23/05 Restani 731-860
Tin and Chromium Coated Steel Sheet fromJapan Negative N/A Affirmed
Cogne Acciai Specialiv. US Slip Op. 05-122 9/12/05 Restani
731-770-775(Review)
Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Germany, Italy,Japan, Korea, Spain, Sweden, and Taiwan Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed
Tropicana Products,Inc. v. US 484F.Supp.2d 1330 4/12/07 Restani 731-1089 Certain Orange Juice from Brazil Affirmative 3-3 RemandedTropicana Products,Inc. v. US Slip Op. 07-141 9/19/07 Restani 731-1089 Certain Orange Juice from Brazil Affirmative 4-2 RemandedTropicana Products,Inc. v. US Slip Op. 08-17 2/5/08 Restani 731-1089 Certain Orange Juice from Brazil Affirmative 4-2 AffirmedBabcock & Wilcox Co.v. US 521 F.Supp. 479 8/20/81 Richardson
731-15(Prelim) Pipes and tubes or iron or steel from Japan Negative 4-1 Remanded
Committee for FairlyTraded VenezuelanCement v. US 279F.Supp.2d 1314 7/28/03 Ridgway
731-451,461, 519(Review)
Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinkerfrom Japan, Mexico, and Venezuela Negative 5-0 Affirmed
Celanese ChemicalsLtd. v. US Slip Op. 07-16 1/29/07 Ridgway
731-1088(Prelim) Polyvinyl Alcohol from Taiwan Negative 3-2 Remanded
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
Marsuda-RodgersInternational v. US 719F. Supp. 1092 7/26/89 Tsoucalas
731-341,344, 345
Tapered Roller Bearings from Hungary andRomania Affirmative 3-2 Reversed Remanded
Asahi Chemical Indus.Co. v. US 727 F.Supp.625 12/9/89 Tsoucalas 731-1, 2 Spun acrylic yarn from Japan and Italy Affirmative 5-0 AffirmedMarsuda-RodgersInternational v. US 734F.Supp. 1019 4/3/90 Tsoucalas
731-341,344, 345
Tapered Roller Bearings from Hungary andRomania Negative 6-0 Affirmed
Torrington Co. v. US747 F.Supp. 744 9/11/90 Tsoucalas
731-391-399
Anti-friction bearings (other than tapered rollerbearings) and parts thereof from WestGermany, France, Italy, Japan, Romania,Singapore, Sweden, Thailand, and the UnitedKingdom Affirmative Various Affirmed
Minebea Co. Ltd andNMB Corp. v. US 794F. Supp. 1161 7/6/92 Tsoucalas
731-391-399
Anti-friction bearings (other than tapered rollerbearings) and parts thereof from WestGermany, France, Italy, Japan, Romania,Singapore, Sweden, Thailand, and the UnitedKingdom Affirmative Various Affirmed
Committee of DomesticSteel Wire Rope &Specialty Cable Mfrs.v. US 808 F.Supp. 376 3/30/93 Tsoucalas
701-305;731-478,480-482
Steel Wire Rope from Chile, India, the People'sRepublic of China, Taiwan, and Thailand Negative 4-0 Affirmed
Stalexport v. US 890F.Supp. 1053 5/23/95 Tsoucalas
701-319-332, 334,336-342,344, 347-353; 731-573-579,581-592,594-597,599-609,612-619
Certain Flat-Rolled Carbon Steel Products fromArgentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil,Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Italy,Japan, Korea, Mexico, the Netherlands, NewZealand, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden,and the United Kingdom Negative Various Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
Timken Co. v. US 913F.Supp. 580 1/3/96 Tsoucalas 731-572
Certain Special Quality Carbon and Alloy Hot-Rolled Steel Bars and Rods and SemifinishedProducts Thereof from Brazil Negative 6-0 Affirmed
Timken U.S. Corp. v.US 264 F.Supp.2d1264 4/24/03 Tsoucalas
AA-1921-143; 731-343(Review)
Certain Bearings from China, France, Germany,Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore,Sweden, and the United Kingdom Negative 4-1 Remanded
NMB Singapore Ltd. v.US 288 F.Supp.2d1308 9/3/03 Tsoucalas
AA1921-143; 731-341, 343-345, 391,399(Review)
Certain Bearings from China, France, Germany,Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore,Sweden, and the United Kingdom Affirmative 4-1 Remanded
Timken U.S. Corp. v.US 310 F.Supp.2d1327 1/27/04 Tsoucalas
731-391,394, 397,399
Certain Bearings from China, France, Germany,Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore,Sweden, and the United Kingdom Negative 3-2 Remanded
Timken U.S. Corp. v.US 321 F.Supp.2d1361 2/25/04 Tsoucalas
AA-1921-143; 731-343(Review)
Certain Bearings from China, France, Germany,Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore,Sweden, and the United Kingdom Negative 2-1 Affirmed
Bratsk AluminumSmelter v. US 28 CIT955 6/22/04 Tsoucalas 731-991 Silicon Metal from Russia Affirmative 3-0 Remanded
NMB Singapore Ltd. v.US 341 F.Supp.2d1327 8/5/04 Tsoucalas
AA1921-143; 731-341, 343-345. 391,399(Review)
Certain Bearings from China, France, Germany,Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore,Sweden, and the United Kingdom Affirmative 3-0 Affirmed
Timken U.S. Corp. v.US Slip Op. 04-98 8/9/04 Tsoucalas
731-391,394, 397,399
Certain Bearings from China, France, Germany,Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore,Sweden, and the United Kingdom Affirmative 3-0 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
Committee for FairBeam Imports v. US477 F.Supp.2d 1313 3/8/07 Tsoucalas
701-401;731-853-854(Review) Structural Steel Beams from Japan and Korea Negative 5-1 Affirmed
Bratsk AluminumSmelter v. US 533F.Supp.2d 1348 1/15/08 Tsoucalas 731-991 Silicon Metal from Russia Afirmative 3-2 AffirmedGlobe Metallurgical,Inc. v. US 547F.Supp.2d 1371 3/19/08 Tsoucalas
731-471(SecondReview) Silicon Metal From Brazil Negative 6-0 Affirmed
Nucor Corp. v. US SlipOp. 08-74 7/9/08 Tsoucalas
AA 1921-197; 701-TA-319-320, 325-327, 348,350; 731-TA-573-574, 576,578, 582-587, 612,and 614-618(SecondReview)
Certain Carbon Steel Products From Australia,Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France,Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Poland,Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and theUnited Kingdom Negative 6-0 Affirmed
Dastech InternationalInc. v. USITC 963F.Supp. 1220 5/1/97 Wallach 731-653
Sebacic Acid from the People's Republic ofChina Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed
Coalition for thePreservation ofAmerican Brake Drum& Rotor AftermarketMfrs v. US 15F.Supp.2d 918 7/13/98 Wallach 731-744 Certain Brake Drums and Rotors from China Negative 4-0 Affirmed
Allegheny LudlumCorp. v. US 116F.Supp.2d 1276 8/28/00 Wallach
701-376-377, 379;731-788-793
Certain Stainless Steel Plate from Belgium,Canada, Italy, Korea, South Africa, and Taiwan Negative 4-2 Affirmed
Acciai Speciali Terni v.US 118 F. Supp. 2d1298 10/2/00 Wallach
701-376-379; 731-788-793 Stainless Steel Plate from the United Kingdom Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
Usinor, Beautour v. US26 CIT 767 7/19/02 Wallach
701-319-332; 731-573-579 Flat-rolled Carbon Steel Products Affirmative 4-2 Remanded
Usinor, Beautour v. US342 F. Supp. 2d 1267 6/9/04 Wallach
701-319-332; 731-573-579 Flat-rolled Carbon Steel Products Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed
Allegheny LudlumCorp. v. US 475F.Supp.2d 1370 12/22/06 Wallach
701-381-382; 731-797-804 Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip Negative 4-2 Affirmed
Wieland Werke AG v.US 525 F.Supp.2d1353 11/7/07 Wallach
701-269;731-311-314, 317(SecondReview)
Brass Sheet and Strip from Brazil, Canada,France, Germany, Italy, and Japan Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed
Atlantic Sugar Ltd. v.US 519 F.Supp. 916 7/8/81 Watson 731-3 Sugars and Sirups from Canada Affirmative 4-1 RemandedAtlantic Sugar Ltd. v.US 2 CIT 295 12/28/81 Watson 731-3 Sugars and Sirups from Canada Affirmative 2-1 RemandedAtlantic Sugar Ltd. v.US 553 F.Supp. 1055 12/14/82 Watson 731-3 Sugars and Sirups from Canada Affirmative 4-1 Remanded
Atlantic Sugar Ltd. v.US 573 F.Supp. 1142 10/14/83 Watson 731-3 Sugars and Sirups from Canada Affirmative 4-1 Vacated ITC
Republic Steel Corp. v.US 591 F.Supp. 640 7/11/84 Watson
701-118,126,135, 156,161, 163,172(Prelim)
Carbon Steel Structural Shapes/Hot-rolledCarbon Steel Bar/Cold-formed Carbon SteelBar/ Hot-rolled Carbon Steel Plate/ Negative Various Remanded
American GrapeGrowers v. US 615F.Supp. 603 8/8/85 Watson
701-210-211; 731-167-168(Prelim) Certain table wine from France and Italy Negative 3-0 Remanded
Armstrong Rubber Co.v. US 614 F.Supp.1252 8/8/85 Watson
731-200(Prelim)
Radial-ply tires for passenger cars from theRepublic of Korea Negative 5-0 Reversed Remanded
ICC Industries v. US632 F. Supp. 36 3/19/86 Watson 731-125
Potassium permanganate from the People'sRepublic of China Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed
Case Name at CITDate
DecidedJudgeRuling
ITC Inv.No. Product
ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands
Fundicao Tupy v. US652 F. Supp. 1538 1/13/87 Watson 731-278
Certain malleable cast-iron pipe fittings fromBrazil Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed
Armstrong Rubber Co.v. US 685 F.Supp. 252 3/17/88 Watson
731-200(Prelim)
Radial-ply tires for passenger cars from theRepublic of Korea Negative 5-0 Remanded
American GrapeGrowers v. US 771F.Supp. 363 7/12/91 Watson
701-210-211; 731-167-168(Prelim) Certain table wine from France and Italy Negative 3-2 Remanded
COURT DECISIONS RESULTING IN REMANDSTO THE U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
I. PERCENTAGE OF REMANDS FOR TEN-YEAR TIME PERIODS FORTHE COURT AS A WHOLE
II. PERCENTAGE OF REMANDS FOR INDIVIDUAL JUDGES
III. REMANDS BY INDIVIDUAL JUDGES AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALLREMANDS BY THE COURT TO THE ITC
IV. PERCENTAGE OF REMANDS FOR NEGATIVE v. AFFIRMATIVEAGENCY INJURY DETERMINATIONS
V. ARE REMANDS MORE LIKELY WHEN THE ITC INJURYDETERMINATION IS NOT UNANIMOUS, OR NEARLY SO?
II. Judicial Review of ITC Injury Determinations: Percentage of Opinions byIndividual Judges Directing Remand
* No remands ordered during this period by Judges Gordon and Maletz.
Aqu
ilino
Bar
zila
y
Boe
Car
man
DiC
arlo
Eato
n
Gol
dber
g
Gor
don
*
Mal
etz
*
Mus
grav
e
New
man
Pogu
e
Rao
Res
tani
Rid
gway
Tsou
cala
s
Wal
lach
Wat
son
Judges (1980 - 2008)
0
20
40
60
80
100P
erce
nt
Percent remanded
II A. Judicial Review of ITC Injury Determinations: Pertinent Data
Judge Total Decisions Number of Remands Number of Affirmed Percent RemandedAquilino 18 9 9 50
Barzilay 7 1 6 14
Boe 3 2 1 67
Carman 26 6 20 23
DiCarlo 22 7 15 32
Eaton 14 10 4 71
Goldberg 22 10 12 45
Gordon * 2 0 2 0
Maletz * 1 0 1 0
Musgrave 8 3 5 37
Newman 3 1 2 33
Pogue 16 6 10 37
Rao 1 1 0 100
Restani 43 16 27 37
Ridgway 2 1 1 50
Tsoucalas 19 5 14 26
Wallach 8 1 7 12
Watson 11 9 2 82
Total 226 88 138* No remands ordered during this period by Judges Gordon and Maletz.
III. A. Judicial Review of ITC Injury Determinations: Proportion of Total DecisionsAccounted for by Individual Judges
8.0%
3.1%1.3%
11.5%
9.7%
6.2%
9.7%0.9%
0.4%3.5%
1.3%
7.1%
0.4%
19.0%
0.9%
8.4%
3.5%4.9%
AquilinoBarzilayBoeCarmanDiCarloEatonGoldbergGordonMaletz
MusgraveNewmanPogueRaoRestaniRidgwayTsoucalasWallachWatson
III.B Judicial Review of ITC Injury Determinations: Proportion of the Total Number ofRemands Ordered by Individual Judges
10.2%
1.1%2.3%
6.8%
8.0%
11.4%
11.4%3.4%
1.1%
6.8%
1.1%
18.2%
1.1%
5.7%
1.1%
10.2%
AquilinoBarzilayBoeCarmanDiCarloEatonGoldbergGordonMaletz
MusgraveNewmanPogueRaoRestaniRidgwayTsoucalasWallachWatson
IV. Judicial Review of ITC Injury Determinations: Comparison of the Number of RemandsOccurring in Cases Involving Negative Injury Determinations v. Affirmative InjuryDeterminations