+ All Categories
Home > Documents > U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Date post: 06-Jan-2018
Category:
Upload: cory-simpson
View: 220 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Many decisions by multiple experts must go (and have gone) into the application and processing of datasets and layers in WATER to produce accurate, consistent, and scientifically defensible results.
27
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center Potential CHIA application for WATER W ater A vailability T ool for E nvironmental R esources
Transcript
Page 1: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

U.S. Department of the InteriorU.S. Geological Survey

USGS Kentucky Water Science Center

Potential CHIA application for WATER

(Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources)

Page 2: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

The Configuration of the WATER Application

WATERSimple Interface WATER draws from

MANY data layers produced by MANY

scientists

“Any Extension”

Output from “Any Extension”

Data Layers

Delineated area

Decisions! TOPMODEL

Page 3: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Many decisions by multiple experts must go (and have gone) into the application and processing of datasets and layers in WATER to produce

accurate, consistent, and scientifically defensible results.

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

2.03

2.42

2.82

3.22

3.62

4.01

4.41

4.81

5.21

5.60

6.00

6.40

6.79

7.19

7.59

7.99

8.38

8.78

9.18

9.58

9.97

10.3

7

10.7

7

11.1

7

11.5

6

11.9

6

12.3

6

12.7

5

13.1

5

13.5

5

CTI

Frac

tion

of W

ater

shed

Page 4: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Brief discussion on the TOPMODEL extension in WATER

Beven, K.J. and M.J. Kirkby. 1979. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, v. 24, pp. 43-69. Wolock, David M. 1993. Simulating the variable-source-area concept of streamflow generation with the watershed model TOPMODEL. USGS WRI 93-4124.

TOPography-based hydrological MODEL

Developed by Beven and Kirkby, 1979 “Physically-based watershed model that

simulates the variable-source-area concept of streamflow generation.” (Wolock, 1993)

Quasi-distributed approach – breaks the watershed up into landscape components that are identified by the topographic wetness index

Page 5: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Qout

Direct Runoff Infiltration

Precipitation

EvaporationET

Subsurface FlowSaturatedAreas

Wat

er C

ycle

TOPMODEL Water Budget Components

Page 6: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

TOPMODEL topographic wetness index

slopeareangcontributiupslope

TWItan

ln

High values of TWI High potential for saturationLow values of TWI Low potential for saturation

Grid cells with the same TWI are hydrologically similar

Calculations need not be performed on every single grid cell (quasi distributed).

Page 7: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Quasi-distributed Approach

0320796517 km2

03282500171 km2

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

2.02

2.55

3.08

3.62

4.15

4.68

5.21

5.74

6.27

6.80

7.33

7.86

8.39

8.92

9.45

9.98

10.5

1

11.0

4

11.5

7

12.1

0

12.6

3

13.1

6

13.6

9

14.2

2

14.7

5

15.2

8

15.8

1

16.3

4

16.8

7

17.4

0

CTI

Frac

tion

of W

ater

shed

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

2.03

2.42

2.82

3.22

3.62

4.01

4.41

4.81

5.21

5.60

6.00

6.40

6.79

7.19

7.59

7.99

8.38

8.78

9.18

9.58

9.97

10.3

7

10.7

7

11.1

7

11.5

6

11.9

6

12.3

6

12.7

5

13.1

5

13.5

5

CTI

Frac

tion

of W

ater

shed

Page 8: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

From Spatial LayersSite IDArea

Total cellsLake area

Uplake AreaSoil Characteristics

Root ZoneStream cells

LatitudeImpervious areas

WithdrawalsDischarges

Topographic Wetness Index

• Estimated hydrograph

• Time series• Saturated areas• Stream length

Precipitation and Temperature Estimates for Each Basin

Historical Climate and gridded

NEXRAD data

DEM

Streams (synthetic)

Histogram

DATA SOURCES• KY Dam Safety Commission• Soil Survey Geographic Data• TR-55 Impervious Erosion Curve• National Land Cover Data 2001• KY Pollutant Discharge Elimination

System• KY Division of Water• NOAA NWS

WATER Data Library

TOPMODEL Extension

Page 9: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Soil CharacteristicsSSURGO Variables Calculated “m” Hydraulic conductivity (moderately

high or higher) Available Water Capacity Field Capacity Porosity Depth (based on conductivity)

And…..

Scaling Parameter “m” computed from processed SSURGO data

m = readily drained soil porosity/rate of decrease with depth

Conductivity MultiplierKsat-High surface

Ksat-Low depth

Scaling Parameter

m porosity field capacity

f

f ln conductivity multiplier

soil depth

Page 10: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Basic TOPMODEL equation:

xx TWITWImSS S – saturation deficitTWI – topographic wetness indexm –controls range of variability in saturation deficit

as m ↑, variability in S ↑ and water table gradient ↑

due to increased effect of topography -

this attenuates peak flow and steadies base flow

Page 11: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Statistical Validation - How well does it work over all flows?

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8 Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency

30-cm rooting depth, NEXRAD ScenarioNa

sh-S

utcl

iffe

Ef

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9 Correlation Coefficient

30-cm rooting depth, NEXRAD Scenario

Corr

elat

ion

Coef

ficie

nt

Page 12: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Statistical Validation How well does it work by flow regime?

Page 13: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

CHIA specific modifications

How do we get there?

Page 14: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Current upgrades being funded through USGS Midwest Area Mining Initiative.

3 objectives: Full implementation of PEST for improved accuracy

and regionalization (internal use for development of various extensions)

Build foundation for PHREEQC and run pilot basin

Add function to implement EarthWorks output from latest version of SEDCAD to automatically modify DEM - more work is needed beyond this.

Page 15: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Implementation of Parameter Estimation capability (PEST)

PEST (Doherty, 2008) Better accommodate

uncertainties or heterogeneities in basin parameters.

Facilitates scenario testing of hydrologic responses obtained by significant changes in parameters.

Helps Identify Most Sensitive Parameters – Minimizes parameter correlation.

Relative Error Analysis – Estimates variability contributed from individual parameters.

TWI

Ksat

Page 16: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Implementation of PHREEQC A USGS Computer Program for Speciation, Batch-Reaction, One-Dimensional Transport, and Inverse Geochemical Calculations (Parkhurst and Appelo, 1999)

Images of PHREEQC output from Aquachem™ application

Images of similar output from Geochemist ‘s Workbench ™ application

For example, PHREEQC enables: Forward and inverse geochemical

speciation modeling: “What minerals are anticipated to

dissolve?” “What minerals will precipitate?” “What geochemical reactions or

rock/water/soil interactions produced these water-chemistry characteristics?”

Mixing models: “If water with composition A mixes with

water with composition B, what is composition of product (water C)?”

1-Dimensional Reactive Transport modeling:

“How does the water chemistry change as it moves along a stream or through an aquifer?”

Potential graphical outputs

Page 17: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Implementation of commonly used AutoCAD formats into WATER

http://www.carlsonsw.com/PL_CS_Mining.html#pillarcuttinghttp://www.donraymond.com/itiproducts.htm

USGS will be working with Dr. Richard Warner (UK) to incorporate output from latest version of SEDCAD into WATER (EarthWorks Package).

Example output from Carlson Software’s Mining 2010 package and EarthWorks

Page 18: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Use of GIS and WATER to Identify and Delineate of Ephemeral, Intermittent and Perennial Channels in the Cumberland Plateau of Eastern Kentucky –

 

Using GIS and the USGS program WATER, spatial data related to topography, soils, geology, rainfall, and field-collected geomorphic data will be used to develop flow duration curves and point-of-origin delineation criteria. This model will be extrapolated to watersheds located in the University of Kentucky’s Robinson Forest for field verification and assessment.

Funded through UK Precision Resource Management Special Grant

Principal Investigators – UK College of AgricultureCarmen T. Agouridis, Ph.D., P.E.; Richard C. Warner, Ph.D.; Christopher D. Barton, Ph.D.;Teri C. Dowdy, GISP 

CollaboratorTanja N. Williamson Ph.D., Project ChiefUnited States Geological Survey, Kentucky Water Science Center

Page 19: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Tasks and processes that need to be implemented Complete PHREEQC and SEDCAD™ programming

started under USGS program Build fully distributed application Build function to incorporate data from outside

databases Implement MapWindow™ open-source code Process mined vs. unmined basins to test methods –

this is new science!

Page 20: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Incorporate fully distributed approach

Critical for routing and other analyses

Quasi DistributedFully Distributed

Page 21: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Incorporate additional data / databases

For example:Trends Station Data and local / site specific data would be obtained and incorporated into PHREEQC extension.

Page 22: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Implement MapWindow open-source code

MapWindow is an open source "Programmable Geographic Information System" that supports manipulation, analysis, and viewing of geospatial data and associated attribute data in several standard GIS data formats. MapWindow is a mapping tool, a GIS modeling system, and a GIS application programming interface (API) all in one convenient redistributable open source form.

MapWindow was developed to address the need for a GIS programming tool that could be used in engineering research and project software, without requiring end users to purchase a complete GIS system, or become GIS experts.

Page 23: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Previously proposed methods test in Kentucky ----

Apply WATER to unmined watersheds in Eastern Appalachian Coalfield regions

baseline hydrologic response compare various settings

hydrogeologic climatic

Apply WATER to mined watersheds in Eastern Appalachian Coalfield regions

≥ 30% surface disturbance simulate mining impact

Characterize changes in hydrologic response of the test watersheds

statistically evaluate changes in basin hydrology with time

compare responses between unmined and mined watersheds

determine whether relation between percent mining-disturbance and hydrologic change is quantifiable

stormwater-runoff response baseflow or ground-water recharge

Validation of WATER for CHIA applications

Page 24: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Tasks and processes that would improve functionality but are not critical Build function to incorporate NEXRAD / climate data

automatically. Make WATER web based.

Page 25: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Incorporate / automate climate data – Rainfall intensity is critical to any process-based application

• Current WATER platform uses static, gridded climate data (aggregated coop station and NEXRAD).

• NOAA NWS and USGS personnel processed >98,500 hourly .XMRG (NEXRAD) files for WATER (2000 to 2006). This data is available via a database and could be automated; however, this is quite involved and may not be worth the price in computing power / speed.

Page 26: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

Migrate to web-based application

Web-based applications involve maintenance, but guarantee up-to-date products / versions and allow data-intensive programs to run from anywhere.

Page 27: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Kentucky Water Science Center.

QUESTIONS?


Recommended