+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Use of Biological Pest Control in Scottish Agriculture · 2019-12-19 · 2). Initially most...

Use of Biological Pest Control in Scottish Agriculture · 2019-12-19 · 2). Initially most...

Date post: 29-May-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 4 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
A wide range of species of bio-control agents have been recorded in recent pesticide usage surveys. These include arthropod and nematode predators and parasites of insect pests, bacterial and fungal insecticides, nematode predators of slugs and bacterial and fungal pathogens of plant disease (Figure 2). Initially most biological pesticide use encountered was for the control of insect pests, however, in recent years, there has been increased use of biological control agents for disease control in protected edible and soft fruit crops (Figures 3 & 4). The majority of bio-control use on outdoor vegetable crops is for slug control (Figure 5). The use of bio-pesticides is likely to continue to increase in Scottish agriculture, complementing conventional pesticide use. Both the recently adopted EU Thematic Strategy for Sustainable use of Pesticides and the greening element of the reformed Common Agricultural Policy encourage an integrated pest management approach incorporating alternative sustainable and environmentally sensitive techniques such as biological control. Use of Biological Pest Control in Scottish Agriculture Biological control is the reduction of a pest population using natural mechanisms such as predation, parasitism or disease. SASA conducts surveys of agricultural and horticultural pesticide use and the data show that whilst there has been little change in the proportion of Scottish crops treated with conventional agrochemical pesticides in the last 10 years (>90%), the biological control of pests has become more widespread over time. Biological pest control is most effective, and most often encountered, in crops grown under protective cover; in Scotland its use is almost exclusively recorded in fruit and vegetable crops grown in glasshouses (protected edible crops) and soft fruit crops grown in polytunnels. The percentage of these crops that are estimated to have been treated with a biological pesticide over the last 10 years is presented in Figure 1. In addition to use on protected crops, in recent surveys (2007 and 2011) biological control has been recorded on around 2% of the total field grown vegetable crop area. Phytoseiulus persimilis attacking a spider mite egg. This species is estimated to have been applied to 9% of vegetables grown in glasshouses in 2011. The predatory mirid bug Macrolophus pygmaeus, estimated to have been applied to 33% of the protected tomato crop in 2011. Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita feeding on a decomposing slug. Estimated to have been used on 35% of the 2011 Brussels sprouts field crop. This poster was prepared by the SASA Photography Services Unit. The background photograph and text are SASA © Crown Copyright. The images of Phytoseiulus persimilis, Macrolophus pygmaeus and Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita are all reproduced by kind permission of Frank Lane Picture Agency - © FLPA All rights reserved. Carol Monie, Jackie Hughes, Gillian Reay, Mike Taylor Science and Advice for Scottish Agriculture (SASA), Roddinglaw Road, Edinburgh EH12 9FJ [email protected] 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 1999 2001 2003 2006 2007 2010 2011 2012 Percentage of Crop Treated Survey Year Protected Edible Crops SoFruit Crops (polytunnel and eld) Amblyseius spp . 12% Phytoseiulus persimilis 11% Bacillus thuringiensis 7% Beauveria bassiana 4% Other biological insec cides < 1% Phasmarhabdis hermaphrodita 12% Steinernema spp . 9% Bacillus sublis 41% Ampelomyces quisqualis 2% Trichoderma spp . 2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 1999 2003 2007 2011 Percentage of area rteated Protected Edible Crops Disease control Insect control 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2006 2010 2012 Percentage of area treated SoFruit Crops Disease control Insect control 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2003 2007 2011 Percentage of area treated Outdoor Vegetable Crops Slug control Disease control Insect control Figure 3: Reasons for biological control use on protected edible crops Figure 4: Reasons for biological control use on soft fruit crops Figure 5: Reasons for biological control use on outdoor vegetable crops
Transcript

A wide range of species of bio-control agents have been recorded in recent pesticide usage surveys. These include arthropod and nematode predators and parasites of insect pests, bacterial and fungal insecticides, nematode predators of slugs and bacterial and fungal pathogens of plant disease (Figure 2). Initially most biological pesticide use encountered was for the control of insect pests, however, in recent years, there has been increased use of biological control agents for disease control in protected edible and soft fruit crops (Figures 3 & 4). The majority of bio-control use on outdoor vegetable crops is for slug control (Figure 5).

The use of bio-pesticides is likely to continue to increase in Scottish agriculture, complementing conventional pesticide use. Both the recently adopted EU Thematic Strategy for Sustainable use of Pesticides and the greening element of the reformed Common Agricultural Policy encourage an integrated pest management approach incorporating alternative sustainable and environmentally sensitive techniques such as biological control.

Use of Biological Pest Control in Scottish Agriculture

Biological control is the reduction of a pest population using natural mechanisms such as predation, parasitism or disease. SASA conducts surveys of agricultural and horticultural pesticide use and the data show that whilst there has been little change in the proportion of Scottish crops treated with conventional agrochemical pesticides in the last 10 years (>90%), the biological control of pests has become more widespread over time.

Biological pest control is most effective, and most often encountered, in crops grown under protective cover; in Scotland its use is almost exclusively recorded in fruit and vegetable crops grown in glasshouses (protected edible crops) and soft fruit crops grown in polytunnels. The percentage of these crops that are estimated to have been treated with a biological pesticide over the last 10 years is presented in Figure 1.

In addition to use on protected crops, in recent surveys (2007 and 2011) biological control has been recorded on around 2% of the total field grown vegetable crop area.

Phytoseiulus persimilis attacking a spider mite egg. This species is estimated to have been applied to 9% of vegetables grown in glasshouses in 2011.

The predatory mirid bug Macrolophus pygmaeus, estimated to have been applied to 33% of the protected tomato crop in 2011.

Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita feeding on a decomposing slug. Estimated to have been used on 35% of the 2011 Brussels sprouts field crop.

This poster was prepared by the SASA Photography Services Unit. The background photograph and text are SASA © Crown Copyright. The images of Phytoseiulus persimilis, Macrolophus pygmaeus and Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita are all reproduced by kind permission of Frank Lane Picture Agency - © FLPA All rights reserved.

Carol Monie, Jackie Hughes, Gillian Reay, Mike TaylorScience and Advice for Scottish Agriculture (SASA), Roddinglaw Road, Edinburgh EH12 9FJ [email protected]

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1999 2001 2003 2006 2007 2010 2011 2012

Perc

enta

ge o

f Cro

p Tr

eate

d

Survey Year

Protected Edible Crops

Soft Fruit Crops(polytunnel and field)

Amblyseius spp.12%

Phytoseiulus persimilis

11%

Bacillus thuringiensis

7%

Beauveria bassiana

4%

Other biological insecticides

< 1%

Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita

12%Steinernema spp.9%

Bacillus subtilis41%

Ampelomyces quisqualis

2%

Trichoderma spp.2%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1999 2003 2007 2011

Perc

enta

ge o

f are

a rte

ated

Protected Edible Crops

Disease control Insect control

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2006 2010 2012

Perc

enta

ge o

f are

a tre

ated

Soft Fruit Crops

Disease control Insect control

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2003 2007 2011

Perc

enta

ge o

f are

a tre

ated

Outdoor Vegetable Crops

Slug controlDisease control Insect control

Figure 3: Reasons for biological control use on protected edible crops Figure 4: Reasons for biological control use on soft fruit crops Figure 5: Reasons for biological control use on outdoor vegetable crops

Recommended