+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Use of Sugar Mill Effluents for Growth of Louisiana Co … · Use of Sugar Mill Effluents for...

Use of Sugar Mill Effluents for Growth of Louisiana Co … · Use of Sugar Mill Effluents for...

Date post: 14-May-2018
Category:
Upload: dinhliem
View: 219 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
15
Use of Sugar Mill Effluents for Growth of Louisiana Co-culture Water Treatment and Added Value Strategy Jacob Foy Louisiana State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Advisors: Dr. M. Teresa Gutierrez-Wing and Dr. Ronald Malone SUBI Annual Meeting 5/28/14 1
Transcript

Use of Sugar Mill Effluents for Growth

of Louisiana Co-culture

Water Treatment and Added Value Strategy

Jacob Foy

Louisiana State University

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

Advisors: Dr. M. Teresa Gutierrez-Wing and Dr. Ronald Malone

SUBI Annual Meeting 5/28/14

1

OBJECTIVES

• Collect and characterize effluent waters from a sugar mill

• Sugar mill acting as surrogate for bioprocessing facility

• Develop water quality model for effluents of a multi-feedstock bioprocessing facility

• Determine suitability of effluents for algal growth

• Algae can add value to process through additional biomass, valuable by-products and additional

water treatment

• Quantify biomass, lipid and pigment production of algae grown in effluents

2

COLLECTION OF EFFLUENTS

• Monthly sampling events at Alma sugar mill in Lakeland, LA

• Dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, ORP and conductivity

• Eight retention ponds and one evaporator water pond

• Duplicate samples from each pond analyzed in Wetland

Biogeochemistry Lab (WBAS) in LSU Oceanography

department

• Extra water from pond #4 and evaporator pond collected

for algal growth experiments

Evaporator

pond

Pond #4

3

Ponds 4 and 5 Pond 6

ALMA PICTURES

4

Evaporator pond after

milling season

Filter mud, ash slurry, bagasse

mixture

View of Alma from bagasse

mounds

5

CHARACTERIZATION OF EFFLUENTS

• Poor water quality

• Extremely large volume of water being discharged

• High levels of nitrogen, phosphorus, and carbon (BOD/COD)

• Current treatment: retention ponds

• Proposed treatment: algal growth in retention ponds

• Deplete N, P, and BOD

• Additional biomass

• Valuable by-products, such as pigments, can offset costs

6

WATER QUALITY

Conductivity Comparison

Pond

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EEO

S

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

During milling

Post milling

D.O. Comparison

Pond

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EEO

mg

-O2/L

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

During milling

Post milling

ORP Comparison

Pond

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EEO

mV

0

100

200

300

400

500

During milling

Post milling

•Highly variable due

to wind

•ORP corrected to EH

EH = ORPmeasured + EC

Temp (°C) EC

10 251

15 247.5

20 244

25 241

30 238

35 235

40 232

45 229

•Range of 7-8.5

•EEO slightly less

pH Comparison

Pond

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EEO

pH

0

2

4

6

8

10

During Milling

Post Milling

•More particulate

matter in water

during milling

7

VOLUME OF EFFLUENTS

Alma water

usage

Wash water: 12.5 mgd

1.05 billion gal/season

Retention

ponds

Evaporation

Evapotranspiration

Infiltration into soil

Evaporator water: 23 mgd

1.9 billion gal/season

Cooled in evaporator

pond

Discharged daily

• 84 day season (10/16/13 – 01/07/14)

• 1.556 million tons of cane processed

• Total effluent waters = 2.95 billion gallons per season 8

RETENTION PONDS: VOLUME ASSESSMENT

• 1.05 billion gal = 3,975,000 m3 flowing into retention ponds

• Data from 10/16/13 to 5/15/14: Ben Hur Research Station in Baton Rouge

• Evaporation: 95,381 m3

• Evapotranspiration: 27,450 m3

• Precipitation: 139,561 m3

• Total retention pond volume at average depth of 1.8 m = 303,000 m3

• Water is infiltrating the soil at alarming rates

𝑉𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑠 = 𝑉𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 + 𝑉𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐 − 𝑉𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑝 − 𝑉𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑟 − 𝑉𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑠𝑒 − 𝑉𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 9

EVAPORATOR WATER

• Average of 23 mgd discharged

• Retention time of < 10 minutes

• Relatively low N and P levels

compared to wash water

• High temperature during milling

• High organic loading

• EPA requirement of BOD < 5 ppm

not being met

• COD on 4/28/14: 34 ppm 10

11

2 NH4+ + 3 O2 → 2 NO2

- + 2 H2O + 4 H+

2 NO2- + O2 → 2 NO3

-

NH3 + O2 → NO2− + 3H+ + 2e−

NO2− + H2O → NO3

− + 2H+ + 2e−

NITROGEN ANALYSIS

PHOSPHORUS ANALYSIS

12

**Note: COD in

pond 4 measured

at 159 ppm on

4/28/14

ALGAL PRODUCTION IN RETENTION PONDS

• Current treatment process is inadequate in removing BOD

• Proposed treatment process will incorporate a mixed co-culture of microalgae and

cyanobacteria (Chlorella vulgaris/Leptolyngbya sp.) in retention ponds

• Robust, native Louisiana co-culture

• Lower N, P, and BOD levels before discharge

• Added value through biomass

• Added value through valuable by-products, specifically pigments

• C-phycocyanin: natural blue pigment

• Applications in pharmaceuticals (anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, anti-cancer)

• Purified form: $1505/gram

• Analytical grade: $4657/gram 13

Design by: Mary Katherine Bledsoe (Graphic Artist)

14

PRECIPITATION

EVAPORATION

EVAPOTRANSPIRATION EVAPOTRANSPIRATION

WASH WATER

INFLOW

OUTFLOW TO

NEXT POND

WHAT’S NEXT?

• Development of water balance model

• Microalgae/cyanobacteria batch experiments in mixture of pond

water and evaporator water

• Quantification of biomass, lipids and pigments

• Determine purity level of pigment

• Measure nutrient uptake

• Additional growth trial in pond #4 at Alma sugar mill beginning in

July 2014 15


Recommended