+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Using an Environmental Management System for Managing DOE’s Legacy DOE Order 450.1 Workshop 26...

Using an Environmental Management System for Managing DOE’s Legacy DOE Order 450.1 Workshop 26...

Date post: 13-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: marcus-tracy-pope
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
9
Using an Environmental Management System for Managing DOE’s Legacy DOE Order 450.1 Workshop 26 February, 2003
Transcript
Page 1: Using an Environmental Management System for Managing DOE’s Legacy DOE Order 450.1 Workshop 26 February, 2003.

Using an Environmental Management System

for Managing DOE’s Legacy

DOE Order 450.1 Workshop

26 February, 2003

Page 2: Using an Environmental Management System for Managing DOE’s Legacy DOE Order 450.1 Workshop 26 February, 2003.

Better, longer-lived materials for containment.

9

Better means of monitoring and

providing advance warning

of releases

Fewer and

smaller footprints

.

More efficient means of repair.

Better land use controls and means

of monitoring same.

Better means of risk communication.

Better performance assessment models to

know what to look for and where.

More efficient means of data storage and

retrieval.

Chemica

l

Toxicity

Bio

mar

kers

Eco

logic

al

Stu

die

s

Natu

ral

Forc

es o

fC

han

ge

Cata

strophic

Events

Material

Research

HumanIntrusion Vadose Zone

Research

Risk

Assess

ment

Geo

gra

phic

Info

rmat

ion

Sys

tem

s

Ris

kM

an

ag

em

en

t

Risk

Com

munica

tion

LandUse

Human

Factors

ComputerScienceRecords

Archiving

RELATED R&D

Institutional

Controls

-M

anagement System

s

-Social System

s

Infr

astr

uctu

reCom

mercial

Technology

Evolution

Reg

ula

tory

Req

uire

men

tsBasic

Scie

nce

Med

ical

Res

earc

h

Page 3: Using an Environmental Management System for Managing DOE’s Legacy DOE Order 450.1 Workshop 26 February, 2003.

IFD-000402-23-99

4 5

3

2

1

67

820

32

33

139

10

11

12

1415

1617

19 18

21

22 23

2425

26

272829

3130

35

36

37

114

112

113

8990

3839

41

42

53

54

102

103

104

105

106

107108

109110

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

69

7071

73 72

74

116 117

127

118

119

120121

122123

124

125

129

126

128

95

52

101

10098

9799

45

46 51

8385

87

88

96

93

94

115

91

9259

78

68

5534

40

44

4356

57

5860

47

4948 50

8684

80

7675

82

81

7779

111

29 sites where portion(s) of the site are expected to require long-term stewardship by 2006

12 sites w ith geographically distinct portions requiring long-term stew ardship by 2006

17 sites w here surface cleanup is completed by 2006 and w ill require long-term stew ardship but subsurface characterization and remediation activities w ill be on-going after 2006

34 sites where cleanup has been completed and DOE is conducting long-term stewardship activities as of 2000

33 sites where cleanup is expected to be completed and DOE will conduct long-term stewardship activities by 2006

33 sites where DOE may be responsible for long-term stewardship, if long-term stewardship activities are necessary

Map of 129 Sites that May Require LTS

Page 4: Using an Environmental Management System for Managing DOE’s Legacy DOE Order 450.1 Workshop 26 February, 2003.

DOE needs a sustainable, long-term approach

0

50

100

150

1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040

Fiscal Year

No.

Site

s in

Leg

acy

Mgt

.

Simple Site Transfers

• UMTRCA Title I

• Small Reactors

LTS Office formed

Rapid Pace ofSite Transfers

• UMTRCA Title II• FUSRAP sites• Fernald• Mound• National Labs• Rocky Flats• Weldon Spring

Additional Sites Schedule Uncertain

LTSM of Large, Complex Sites

• Hanford• Oak Ridge• Savannah River• Idaho

1996-2000 Need for LTS Established• Recognize LTS issues• Develop initial LTS baseline• Identify specific LTS challenges• Portions of some sites enter LTS

2001-2006Build operations for effective LM• Build LTS into cleanup decisions• Develop site LTS transition plans• Develop LTS S&T Roadmap• Establish Office of Legacy

Management• Resolve site-specific & nat’l LM issues• Additional portions of sites enter LM

2006-LTSM program in full operation• Implement site-specific LM plans• Transfer LM responsibilities • Deploy LM technologies

Page 5: Using an Environmental Management System for Managing DOE’s Legacy DOE Order 450.1 Workshop 26 February, 2003.

Department of Energy Responsibility

EM Program Cleanup

Waste Repositories

(e.g., WIPP)

Legacy Management Responsibilities are Evolving

Sites that Supported Former DOE Missions

Private Sector Sites• FUSRAP• Mining & Milling• Research• Nuclear Fuel Cycle

MOU

UMTRCA Title II

NWPA §151

AEA §161(g)

Hall Amendm

ent

MOUsPermits

PL 105-119 (1998)

Hall Amendm

ent

MOAs

GSA

Third Party Cleanup

Mining and Milling

NRC Licensees

Army COE FUSRAPTransfer Portions to Local Gov’ts

• Los Alamos National Laboratory

Property Transfer/Lease

Lease/Permit Portions to Other Federal Agencies

• Hanford Reach National Monument (DOI/USFWS)

• Savannah River (DOA/USFS)• Rocky Flats Wildlife Refuge

(DOI/USFWS)

Transfer Portions to Private Sector• Pinellas• Miamisburg• East Tennessee Technology Park

Transfer of LM Responsibility

Sale to Private Sector Owner• (e.g., Oxnard)

Continuing DOE Missions• NA (e.g., Los Alamos, NTS)• SC (e.g., LBL, ORNL)• NE (Argonne-West)

Legacy Management

and Long-term

Surveillance & Maintenance

Shared LTSM

(LM Record Keeping)

Page 6: Using an Environmental Management System for Managing DOE’s Legacy DOE Order 450.1 Workshop 26 February, 2003.

Legacy Management

Site surveillanceand maintenance

Application andenforcement ofinstitutionalcontrols

Informationmanagement

Environmentalmonitoring

Deed Restri

ctions

ActiveActive

SiteSite

RemediationRemediation

Apply Site Transition FrameworkApply Site Transition Framework

TransitionFramework

Develop LTS PlanningDevelop LTS Planning

Implement and Optimize LMImplement and Optimize LM

Consensus on “Criteria” by Federal, State and Local governments &

Stakeholders

Consensus on “Criteria” by Federal, State and Local governments &

Stakeholders

EMS will help with the transition EMS will help with the transition from cleanup to stewardshipfrom cleanup to stewardship

Page 7: Using an Environmental Management System for Managing DOE’s Legacy DOE Order 450.1 Workshop 26 February, 2003.

• Environmental Stewardship Policy• Risk-based Budget Prioritization• Organizational Responsibility and Training• Compliance Assurance• Institutional/Project-specific Operational Controls & Maintenance• Monitoring, Surveillance and Reporting• Emergency Preparedness, Response and Contingency Management• Records Management• Performance Reviews, Corrective Action and Improvement• Stakeholder Involvement

BNL Identified LTS-EMS Integration Opportunities

Page 8: Using an Environmental Management System for Managing DOE’s Legacy DOE Order 450.1 Workshop 26 February, 2003.

Capability Enhancements to Sustain Long-Term Environmental Stewardship

Page 9: Using an Environmental Management System for Managing DOE’s Legacy DOE Order 450.1 Workshop 26 February, 2003.

• LTS is a Department-wide responsibility• LTS is a component of all aspects of Departmental decision-making• The Department is a trustee of natural and cultural resources• LTS should be incorporated into relevant Departmental policies,

practices, and systems• An intergenerational approach is needed for LTS• LTS policy must provide a consistent framework and acknowledge sites’

need for flexibility• Involvement of stakeholders and state, local, and tribal governments is

critical to LTS

Principles of Long-Term Stewardship


Recommended