Using Data for ELL SuccessAllyson Hile, Director of Language ServicesStephanie Easley, ELL Assessment Specialist
DESE Data RequestStudent names and MOSIS AMAO achievement Cohort
MAP Achievement
MAP-ACCESS Correlation
Math ELATotal # of students Cohort 1 Cohort 2
Overall ACCESS score
Advanced Advanced 24 3 21 5.52Proficient Advanced 35 5 30 5.31Advanced Proficient 40 5 35 5.40Advanced Basic 16 2 14 4.58Proficient Proficient 96 14 82 5.01Basic Proficient 104 20 84 5.07Proficient Basic 67 6 61 5Basic Basic 183 23 160 4.64Below Basic Basic 187 14 163 4.45Basic Below Basic 197 43 152 4.09Below Basic Below Basic 479 87 291 3.73
2015 MAP & ACCESS Correlation
Math ELATotal # of students Cohort 1 Cohort 2
Overall ACCESS score
Advanced Advanced 23 6 17 5.5Proficient Advanced 16 4 12 5.46Advanced Proficient 22 3 19 5.67Advanced Basic 23 3 20 5.2Proficient Proficient 92 7 85 5.6Basic Proficient 51 5 46 5.48Proficient Basic 201 29 171 4.95Basic Basic 585 69 516 3.62Below Basic Basic 79 8 71 3.96Basic Below Basic 193 47 146 3.64Below Basic Below Basic 202 54 148 3.09
2014 MAP & ACCESS Correlation
What do you notice about MAP achievement versus language proficiency?
Math ELATotal # of students Cohort 1 Cohort 2
Overall ACCESS score
Advanced Advanced 23 6 17 5.5Proficient Advanced 16 4 12 5.46Advanced Proficient 22 3 19 5.67Advanced Basic 23 3 20 5.2Proficient Proficient 92 7 85 5.6Basic Proficient 51 5 46 5.48Proficient Basic 201 29 171 4.95Basic Basic 585 69 516 3.62Below Basic Basic 79 8 71 3.96Basic Below Basic 193 47 146 3.64Below Basic Below Basic 202 54 148 3.09
2014 MAP & ACCESS Correlation
District Wide Trend
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
Axis
Title
AMAO 2- MET
2015
2014
2013
2012
More Trends
1st-2nd Writing 2nd-3rd Writing
Principal Data “Chats”
Using ACCESS growth reports, identify:
• Promising trends
• Concerning trends
• Next steps, highlighting� Professional development possibilities such as coaching specific
teachers/teams, whole staff professional development, department PD such as SIOP, CLIMBS, co-teaching
� How can Language Services support you?
8th-9th Writing
9th-10th 9th-10th9th-10th Writing Growth
Central Office Data “Chats”
Helps to explain the language load of the MAP/EOC
Justify:
• budget requests (additional ESL staff)
• the need for MAP and other accommodations
Math ELATotal # of students Cohort 1 Cohort 2
Overall ACCESS score
Advanced Advanced 23 6 17 5.5Proficient Advanced 16 4 12 5.46Advanced Proficient 22 3 19 5.67Advanced Basic 23 3 20 5.2Proficient Proficient 92 7 85 5.6Basic Proficient 51 5 46 5.48Proficient Basic 201 29 171 4.95Basic Basic 585 69 516 3.62Below Basic Basic 79 8 71 3.96Basic Below Basic 193 47 146 3.64Below Basic Below Basic 202 54 148 3.09
2014 MAP & ACCESS Correlation
ELLevation Education Software
• Scale Score Comparison Reports
• Score History Report
• Students Needing Attention
• Future use:� Individual Education Plans� Electronic monitoring-MELLs and FLEPs� Progression monitoring-ELLs
Scale Score Comparison
ELP Score History Report
Students Needing Attention
Questions?
Thank you!